Knowledge (XXG)

Arsenal Football Club v Reed

Source đź“ť

124:
entitle Arsenal FC to forbid this use. Or if there must be a specific interest by the owner of the registered trade mark. In this point, the ECJ made clear that Article 5 (1) (a) of the trade mark directive requires for its applicability a specific interest. Ensuing, the ECJ pointed out, that a specific interest is constituted by violation of an essential function. The owner of a registered trade mark could only prohibit the use of an identical sign if his interests regarding the essential function of the trade mark violated. The essential function of a registered trade mark is to identify the origin of the goods. So there is no danger of confusion by the customers. A use of an identical sign in a merely describing way would not violate the interest of the owner of the trade mark. The ECJ is convinced that the style of the products sold by Reed could lead to the impression in the course of trade, that there is a relationship between these products and Arsenal FC. Even the disclaimers at the stalls that the products sold by Reed are not official products of Arsenal FC, do not lead to another estimate. Following the opinion of the ECJ, most of all by the time the products left the stalls they can be regarded as official Products of the Arsenal FC by other customers. The interesting point here is that the arguments are identical with those, which lead to the rejection in the claim of passing off. Under this the decision about the claim of passing off maybe has to be reconsidered. But the ECJ did not say anything about this former ruling of the High Court and its arguments. Going back to the case, the ECJ assume to be convinced that the use of a sign which is identical with a registered trade mark is suitable to harm the guarantee of origin and therefore consequently the essential function of a registered trade mark. Consequently, in this particular case, there is a violation of the specific interests of the Arsenal FC by Reed. He used the sign in the meaning of Article 5 (1) of the trade mark directive. Therefore, there is a trade mark infringement by Reed selling products, not official wear by Arsenal FC, but carrying the sign of the Arsenal FC.
98:. The High Court rejected the claim in the terms of passing off. It was mentioned by the High Court that the products sold by Reed were not noticed as an indication of origin by the customers, because of the disclaimer notices at the stalls. Arsenal FC could not prove that the customers were not able to differentiate between the original product and the ones sold by Reed. So there was no use of the marks as badges of origin which were causative for the claim of passing off. Additionally, it was held that the marks were only used as badges of allegiance and loyalty. In terms of the claim of trademark infringement it is relevant to make clear if any respective use of the sign is a trademark infringement or just the use as a mark. It was difficult to interpret whether this legal issue covered by the national law which is influenced by the First Council Directive 89/104 of December 21, 1988, to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks. To sort out that matter, the High Court referred the following questions to the European Court of Justice. 133:
1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, where a third party uses in the course of trade a sign which is identical to a validly registered trade mark on goods which are identical to those for which it is registered, the trade mark proprietor of the mark is entitled, in circumstances such as those in the present case, to rely on Article 5(1)(a) of that directive to prevent that use. It is immaterial that, in the context of that use, the sign is perceived as a badge of support for or loyalty or affiliation to the trade mark proprietor.
142:
interest by the owner of the registered trade mark. And therefore this special interest has to concern an essential function of the trade mark. In this case the ECJ pointed out that the essential function is the guarantee of origin. The consideration that there could be other essential functions is not far to seek obvious. If such interests exist and what they will be was left unanswered by European Court of Justice.
1139: 1163: 1175: 1151: 112:(b) the third party has no defence to infringement by virtue of Article 6(1) of the Directive; does the third party have a defence to infringement on the ground that the use complained of does not indicate trade origin (i.e. a connection in the course of trade between the goods and the trade mark proprietor)? 179:
It was clear that the evidence showed that there were instances of confusion, albeit few, and that consumers seeing identical signs to Arsenal's registered marks, complained to Arsenal. If there was no such likelihood of confusion there would be no need for Reed to inform his customers expressly that
123:
At first, the ECJ pointed out that Reed was using a sign in the course of trade which was identical with the trade mark registered by Arsenal FC. In this particular case, there is a trademark infringement. Beyond that the question had to be answered whether any use of the sign of a third party would
183:
Further, the judge's decision on passing off was doubted. Although, Aldous LJ's comments were obiter, the traditional form of passing off was said to be no longer definitive of the ambit of the cause of action which now was approximating to a law of 'unfair trading' or 'unfair competition'. To date
132:
For that reason, the European Court of Justice, in answer to the questions referred to it by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, by order of 4 May 2001, ruled: In a situation which is not covered by Article 6(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December
159:
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, and held that in so far as the ECJ had made findings of fact, the conclusions were not inconsistent with the findings of fact reached by the judge, and were inevitable in the circumstances. The ECJ had considered whether the third party's use affected or was
163:
At no stage had the ECJ suggested that use which was not understood by the public to be a designation of the origin, could not infringe. The judge had found that Reed's use of the marks did not indicate the origin of the goods but had failed to consider whether such use was liable to affect or
150:
When the case was remitted from the ECJ back to Laddie J, it was found that the ECJ had exceeded its jurisdiction and had made findings of fact, and contrary to the English Court's findings in the first judgment. Laddie J applied the ECJ's guidance on the principles of law and disregarding any
141:
This decision has a special relevance for the trade mark law in view of the trade mark directive. It pointed out that the important requirements are the specific interests and as a consequence of that the essential function. For the applicability of the law, there has to be at first a specific
77:
number 1383343, for the Arsenal Cannon device, registered trademark number 1387461, for the Arsenal FC crest device, registered trademark number 1387589 and the words "Arsenal Gunners", registered trademark number 1393203, which were registered in 1989. Matthew Reed had been selling football
164:
jeopardise the guarantee of origin which was the essential feature of Arsenal's marks. Reed's use meant that the goods which did not originate from Arsenal were in free circulation. This affected the ability of Arsenal's marks to guarantee the origin of the goods.
54:
had considered whether the third party use affected, or was likely to affect, the essential function of the mark, and had found the third party use of the registered trademarks was liable to have an effect on the functions of the registered trademark.
1178: 109:(a) a third party uses in the course of trade a sign identical with that trade mark in relation to goods which are identical with those for which the trade mark is registered; and 160:
likely to affect the essential function of the mark, and had found that Reed's use of the registered trade marks was liable to affect one of the functions of the registered mark.
854: 859: 82:
for around 30 years. At the stalls were notices and disclaimers, stating that the products were not official. The few official products he had offered were specially labeled.
907: 115:
2. If so, is the fact that the use in question would be perceived as a badge of support, loyalty or affiliation to the trade mark proprietor a sufficient connection?
63:
Arsenal FC is a well known football club which was founded in 1886. The club generated revenues of ÂŁ381.7 million in the business year which ended 31 May 2010,
46:
bearing the registered trademarks of the Arsenal FC. In January 1999 Arsenal Football Club Plc started proceedings against Matthew Reed. They elected that Reed had
902: 720: 715: 482: 416: 350: 336: 282: 230: 442: 376: 296: 710: 887: 575: 897: 737: 531: 505: 390: 979: 1074: 684: 651: 456: 310: 256: 725: 1089: 952: 644: 871: 630: 184:(April 2007), there is little sign that Aldous LJ's comments have led to a wider tort of unfair competition within the UK. 1058: 938: 602: 1032: 864: 849: 742: 623: 1206: 984: 218: 167:
It was also held that the use of the word 'Arsenal' on a scarf or other item of clothing could have three meanings:
568: 1119: 798: 51: 94:. They alleged that Reed infringed certain of their registered trademarks and had carried out committed acts of 931: 761: 420: 354: 234: 1154: 1027: 1009: 1001: 827: 819: 689: 47: 20: 1201: 1166: 1142: 561: 91: 1094: 1079: 74: 39: 1162: 945: 892: 535: 509: 394: 476: 330: 276: 1053: 924: 785: 151:
conclusions reached on the facts. The case was decided in favour of Reed. Arsenal appealed.
1099: 777: 460: 314: 260: 79: 1104: 769: 732: 676: 609: 1195: 90:
Arsenal FC started proceedings in first instance against Reed in January 1999 at the
70: 27: 180:
the goods were not official. It was clear that the trademarks did designate origin.
1114: 1109: 1084: 671: 584: 24: 50:
certain of the registered trademarks and had carried out acts of passing off. The
219:
http://www.arsenal/the-club/corporate-info/arsenal-holdings-financial-results.com
1037: 996: 95: 969: 65: 73:
products. Arsenal FC owns UK trademark registrations for the word "Arsenal",
43: 553: 532:"Intellectual Property Office - Arsenal Football Club v Matthew Reed" 506:"Intellectual Property Office - Arsenal Football Club v Matthew Reed" 391:"Intellectual Property Office - Arsenal Football Club v Matthew Reed" 78:
merchandise articles with the Arsenal FC marks from stalls near the
557: 201: 1067: 1046: 1020: 962: 916: 880: 839: 812: 751: 700: 664: 417:"Arsenal Football Club PLC v Reed [CAEW]" 351:"Arsenal Football Club PLC v Reed [CAEW]" 231:"Arsenal Football Club PLC v Reed [CAEW]" 106:1. Where a trade mark is validly registered and 569: 8: 576: 562: 554: 38:Arsenal FC is a football club, which owns 170:a) the owner was a supporter of Arsenal 193: 23:case concerning the sale of unlicensed 481:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 474: 335:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 328: 281:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 274: 17:Arsenal Football Club vs. Matthew Reed 7: 1150: 1174: 176:c) a combination of the above two. 1090:Kroenke Sports & Entertainment 14: 1173: 1161: 1149: 1138: 1137: 953:The Angel (North London Forever) 173:b) the goods came from Arsenal 1: 1059:Royal Ordnance Factories F.C. 975:The Arsenal Stadium Mystery 765:(1888–1890 & 1893–1913) 1223: 1133: 1120:2000 UEFA Cup final riots 1033:Arsenal Supporters' Trust 908:Manchester United rivalry 888:League record by opponent 593: 52:European Court of Justice 932:Shouting for the Gunners 721:Records & statistics 42:. Matthew Reed had sold 1010:All or Nothing: Arsenal 903:Manchester City rivalry 146:Rejection of ECJ Ruling 21:trademark infringement 948:" / "Our Goal" (2000) 586:Arsenal Football Club 92:High Court of Justice 86:High Court of Justice 40:registered trademarks 25:Arsenal Football Club 1095:Arsenal tube station 1080:Bank of England club 865:Player of the Season 795:Women & Academy 75:registered trademark 538:on 14 November 2011 512:on 14 November 2011 397:on 14 November 2011 128:Ruling of the court 1207:Trademark case law 946:Arsenal Number One 893:North London derby 443:"EU law - EUR-Lex" 377:"EU law - EUR-Lex" 297:"EU law - EUR-Lex" 119:Reason of decision 102:Referred Questions 1189: 1188: 1013:(2022 docuseries) 855:25–99 appearances 832: 824: 803: 790: 782: 774: 766: 495:see 1 All ER 137 1214: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1169: 1165: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1068:Related articles 1054:Dial Square F.C. 925:Good Old Arsenal 860:1–24 appearances 850:100+ appearances 830: 822: 813:Training grounds 801: 788: 786:Emirates Stadium 780: 772: 764: 654: 647: 641: 633: 626: 620: 612: 605: 599: 587: 578: 571: 564: 555: 548: 547: 545: 543: 534:. Archived from 528: 522: 521: 519: 517: 508:. Archived from 502: 496: 493: 487: 486: 480: 472: 470: 468: 459:. Archived from 453: 447: 446: 439: 433: 432: 430: 428: 423:on 22 March 2011 419:. Archived from 413: 407: 406: 404: 402: 393:. Archived from 387: 381: 380: 373: 367: 366: 364: 362: 357:on 22 March 2011 353:. Archived from 347: 341: 340: 334: 326: 324: 322: 313:. Archived from 307: 301: 300: 293: 287: 286: 280: 272: 270: 268: 259:. Archived from 253: 247: 246: 244: 242: 237:on 22 March 2011 233:. Archived from 227: 221: 216: 210: 209: 198: 80:Highbury Stadium 1222: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1185: 1179: 1167: 1155: 1143: 1129: 1100:Highbury Square 1075:The Invincibles 1063: 1042: 1016: 958: 912: 898:Chelsea rivalry 876: 835: 808: 747: 696: 660: 652: 645: 639: 631: 624: 618: 610: 603: 597: 589: 585: 582: 552: 551: 541: 539: 530: 529: 525: 515: 513: 504: 503: 499: 494: 490: 473: 466: 464: 463:on 8 April 2008 457:"Archived copy" 455: 454: 450: 441: 440: 436: 426: 424: 415: 414: 410: 400: 398: 389: 388: 384: 375: 374: 370: 360: 358: 349: 348: 344: 327: 320: 318: 317:on 8 April 2008 311:"Archived copy" 309: 308: 304: 295: 294: 290: 273: 266: 264: 263:on 8 April 2008 257:"Archived copy" 255: 254: 250: 240: 238: 229: 228: 224: 217: 213: 200: 199: 195: 190: 157: 148: 139: 137:Legal relevance 130: 121: 104: 88: 61: 36: 12: 11: 5: 1220: 1218: 1210: 1209: 1204: 1194: 1193: 1187: 1186: 1184: 1183: 1171: 1159: 1147: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1125:Arsenal v Reed 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1105:Gillespie Road 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1071: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1056: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1024: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1014: 1006: 1005: 1004: 999: 989: 988: 987: 982: 972: 966: 964: 960: 959: 957: 956: 949: 942: 935: 928: 920: 918: 914: 913: 911: 910: 905: 900: 895: 890: 884: 882: 878: 877: 875: 874: 869: 868: 867: 862: 857: 852: 843: 841: 837: 836: 834: 833: 831:(1999–present) 825: 816: 814: 810: 809: 807: 806: 805: 804: 802:(1987–present) 793: 792: 791: 789:(2006–present) 783: 775: 770:Invicta Ground 767: 755: 753: 749: 748: 746: 745: 740: 735: 730: 729: 728: 723: 718: 713: 704: 702: 698: 697: 695: 694: 693: 692: 687: 679: 677:Arsenal W.F.C. 674: 668: 666: 662: 661: 659: 658: 657: 656: 649: 640:Current season 637: 636: 635: 628: 616: 615: 614: 607: 594: 591: 590: 583: 581: 580: 573: 566: 558: 550: 549: 523: 497: 488: 448: 434: 408: 382: 368: 342: 302: 288: 248: 222: 211: 192: 191: 189: 186: 156: 153: 147: 144: 138: 135: 129: 126: 120: 117: 103: 100: 87: 84: 60: 57: 35: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1219: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1197: 1182: 1172: 1170: 1164: 1160: 1158: 1148: 1146: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1070: 1066: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1049: 1047:Related clubs 1045: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 994: 993: 990: 986: 983: 981: 978: 977: 976: 973: 971: 968: 967: 965: 961: 954: 950: 947: 943: 940: 936: 933: 929: 926: 922: 921: 919: 915: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 885: 883: 879: 873: 870: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 848: 847: 845: 844: 842: 838: 829: 828:London Colney 826: 821: 818: 817: 815: 811: 800: 797: 796: 794: 787: 784: 779: 776: 771: 768: 763: 760: 759: 757: 756: 754: 752:Home stadiums 750: 744: 741: 739: 736: 734: 731: 727: 724: 722: 719: 717: 714: 712: 709: 708: 706: 705: 703: 699: 691: 688: 686: 683: 682: 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 669: 667: 663: 655: 650: 648: 643: 642: 638: 634: 629: 627: 622: 621: 617: 613: 608: 606: 601: 600: 596: 595: 592: 588: 579: 574: 572: 567: 565: 560: 559: 556: 537: 533: 527: 524: 511: 507: 501: 498: 492: 489: 484: 478: 462: 458: 452: 449: 444: 438: 435: 422: 418: 412: 409: 396: 392: 386: 383: 378: 372: 369: 356: 352: 346: 343: 338: 332: 316: 312: 306: 303: 298: 292: 289: 284: 278: 262: 258: 252: 249: 236: 232: 226: 223: 220: 215: 212: 207: 203: 197: 194: 187: 185: 181: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 161: 154: 152: 145: 143: 136: 134: 127: 125: 118: 116: 113: 110: 107: 101: 99: 97: 93: 85: 83: 81: 76: 72: 71:merchandising 68: 67: 58: 56: 53: 49: 45: 41: 33: 31: 29: 26: 22: 18: 1202:Arsenal F.C. 1124: 1115:Arsenal firm 1110:Tuesday Club 1085:Emirates Cup 1008: 991: 974: 823:(until 1999) 762:Manor Ground 716:1966–present 672:Arsenal F.C. 540:. Retrieved 536:the original 526: 514:. Retrieved 510:the original 500: 491: 465:. Retrieved 461:the original 451: 437: 425:. Retrieved 421:the original 411: 399:. Retrieved 395:the original 385: 371: 359:. Retrieved 355:the original 345: 319:. Retrieved 315:the original 305: 291: 265:. Retrieved 261:the original 251: 239:. Retrieved 235:the original 225: 214: 205: 196: 182: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 162: 158: 149: 140: 131: 122: 114: 111: 108: 105: 89: 64: 62: 37: 16: 15: 1180:WikiProject 1038:Gay Gooners 992:Fever Pitch 799:Meadow Park 781:(1913–2006) 206:arsenal.com 96:passing off 69:by selling 59:Legal issue 28:merchandise 1196:Categories 1028:Supporters 1021:Supporters 970:Arsenal TV 820:UCL Ground 188:References 66:inter alia 1002:1997 film 997:1992 book 985:1939 film 980:1939 book 939:Hot Stuff 881:Rivalries 773:(1890–93) 738:Ownership 711:1886–1966 467:11 August 321:11 August 267:11 August 48:infringed 44:souvenirs 1168:Wikinews 1144:Category 955:" (2022) 941:" (1998) 934:" (1993) 927:" (1971) 778:Highbury 681:Academy 598:Managers 477:cite web 331:cite web 277:cite web 1156:Commons 840:Players 701:History 619:Seasons 542:20 June 516:20 June 427:20 June 401:20 June 361:20 June 241:20 June 34:Summary 743:Museum 726:Europe 202:"Home" 155:Appeal 963:Media 917:Songs 872:Women 733:Women 690:Women 665:Teams 653:Women 632:Women 611:Women 19:is a 846:Men 758:Men 707:Men 544:2011 518:2011 483:link 469:2008 429:2011 403:2011 363:2011 337:link 323:2008 283:link 269:2008 243:2011 685:Men 646:Men 625:Men 604:Men 1198:: 479:}} 475:{{ 333:}} 329:{{ 279:}} 275:{{ 204:. 30:. 951:" 944:" 937:" 930:" 923:" 577:e 570:t 563:v 546:. 520:. 485:) 471:. 445:. 431:. 405:. 379:. 365:. 339:) 325:. 299:. 285:) 271:. 245:. 208:.

Index

trademark infringement
Arsenal Football Club
merchandise
registered trademarks
souvenirs
infringed
European Court of Justice
inter alia
merchandising
registered trademark
Highbury Stadium
High Court of Justice
passing off
"Home"
http://www.arsenal/the-club/corporate-info/arsenal-holdings-financial-results.com
"Arsenal Football Club PLC v Reed [CAEW]"
the original
"Archived copy"
the original
cite web
link
"EU law - EUR-Lex"
"Archived copy"
the original
cite web
link
"Arsenal Football Club PLC v Reed [CAEW]"
the original
"EU law - EUR-Lex"
"Intellectual Property Office - Arsenal Football Club v Matthew Reed"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑