241:, described the European court's decision as an "important and welcome judgment", saying that it was "common sense" that unions "should not be forced to accept into membership people opposed to the basic principles of trade unionism." He added, "Every union will welcome this clear decision that they can now expel BNP members." The ASLEF General Secretary, Keith Norman, thanked the 18 unions who gave ASLEF financial assistance to allow them to go to the European courts:
178:
the BNP". ASLEF was therefore forced to re-admit Lee as a member, in breach of its own rules. Failure to re-admit would have meant paying compensation of at least €8,600. Even though it re-admitted Lee, ASLEF remained exposed to a claim for compensation of up to €94,200. ASLEF lodged an application with the
218:
Of greater weight was the union's right to choose its members. Trade unions in the UK and Europe were commonly affiliated to political parties or movements, particularly those on the left. They were not "bodies solely devoted to the politically-neutral aspects of the well-being of their members, but
177:
which overturned the earlier decision, finding that a union could expel a member on the ground of his or her conduct, and referred the case to a second
Employment Tribunal. However, the second tribunal upheld Lee's complaint, saying that his expulsion had been "primarily because of his membership of
222:
The UK government argued that UK law would have allowed Lee's expulsion if ASLEF had restricted itself to a complaint solely about Lee's conduct. However, the Court noted that the
Employment Tribunal found that ASLEF's objections were primarily based on his BNP membership, and the Court thought it
210:
The Court held that just as a worker should be free to join or not join a union, so is a trade union equally free to choose its members. Article 11 could not be interpreted as imposing obligations on associations to admit anyone who applied to join. Further, where associations are set up by people
214:
The Court's view was that the United
Kingdom had not struck the right balance between Lee's right and the rights of ASLEF. The Court was persuaded that expulsion did not impinge in any significant way on Lee's freedom of expression or political activity, nor would he suffer any detriment: there
198:
ASLEF's case was that the union had been prevented from expelling a member due to his membership of the BNP, a political party which advocates views inimical to its own, and that this was an infringement of freedom of association. The nature of the argument is that the United
Kingdom's law (i.e.
112:
to assist in the furtherance of the labour movement generally towards a
Socialist society promote and develop and enact positive policies in regard to equality of treatment in our industries and ASLEF regardless of sex, sexual orientation, marital status, religion, creed, colour, race or ethnic
148:
pamphleteers. On 19 April 2002, the
Executive Committee of ASLEF voted unanimously to expel Lee, on the grounds that his membership of the BNP was incompatible with membership of ASLEF, that he was likely to bring the union into disrepute and that he was against the objects of the union.
133:
local elections. On 17 April 2002, an ASLEF officer sent a report on Lee to the union's
General Secretary, including information that Lee was a BNP activist, had distributed anti-Islamic leaflets and that in 1998 he had been a BNP candidate in
512:
219:
were often ideological with strongly held views". There had been no suggestion in the
Employment Tribunal hearings that ASLEF had erred in concluding that Lee's political values and ideals fundamentally clashed with its own.
199:
s.174 of TULRCA 1992) which required ASLEF to take back Lee into union membership or face compensation payments, violates union members' freedom of association. So ASLEF was now suing the UK government (rather than Lee).
70:
Josep
Casadevall (Andorra - President), Nicolas Bratza (UK), Stanislav Pavlocschi (Moldova), Lech Garlicki (Poland), Ljiljana Mijoviċ (Bosnia & Herzegovina), Ján Šikuta (Slovakia), Pâivi Hirvelä (Finland).
323:
542:
502:
170:, which prohibits unions from excluding or expelling persons wholly or to any extent on the ground that the individual is or was a member of a political party. He was successful in his case.
226:
In the absence of any hardship suffered by Lee or any abusive and unreasonable conduct by ASLEF, the Court held that there had been a violation of
Article 11 and found in favour of ASLEF.
167:
194:
Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
274:
105:
89:
117:
In 1978, ASLEF's governing body, the Annual Assembly of Delegates, passed a resolution to campaign against and "expose the obnoxious policies of political parties such as the
477:
414:
522:
527:
242:
211:
who share common values, ideals and goals, it would run counter to the very effectiveness of the freedom at stake if they had no control over their membership.
537:
223:
unreasonable to expect ASLEF to use the pretext of a complaint about conduct, since this was carried out by him in the context of his membership of the BNP.
207:
Finding in ASLEF's favour, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 11 and awarded the union €53,900 for costs and expenses.
262:
246:
517:
250:
507:
282:
448:
376:
187:
532:
298:
270:
547:
294:
179:
108:(ASLEF) is an independent trade union representing mainly train drivers employed on the UK railways. One of ASLEF's aims is,
85:
29:
418:
310:
129:(BNP)—which had grown from the NF—joined ASLEF. In April 2002, Lee stood as a candidate for the BNP in the
331:
174:
144:, the BNP magazine, and a fax from the Bexley Council for Racial Equality stating that Lee had seriously harassed
135:
290:
126:
118:
238:
215:
being no "closed shop", there was no apparent prejudice to him in terms of employment or livelihood.
140:
122:
467:
443:
398:
55:
306:
163:
400:
Case of Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers & Firemen (ASLEF) v. The United Kingdom
472:
372:
145:
482:
234:
487:
496:
338:
81:
93:
183:
302:
373:"Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms"
78:
Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen v United Kingdom
286:
278:
258:
130:
266:
254:
513:
European Court of Human Rights cases involving the United Kingdom
324:
Wilson and the National Union of Journalists v the United Kingdom
186:) on 24 March 2005. The complaint relied on Article 11 of the
449:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
168:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
543:
Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
106:
Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
503:
Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights
190:(freedom of assembly and association), which states,
473:
Full text of the European Convention on Human Rights
166:to contest his expulsion, under section 174 of the
66:
61:
51:
43:
35:
25:
20:
415:"TUC congratulates ASLEF on European Court win"
192:
110:
138:. Attached was an article written by Lee for
8:
468:European Court of Human Rights full judgment
17:
444:European Court judgment 27 February 2007
350:
523:United Kingdom constitutional case law
488:BBC News report: Lee's election result
528:History of the British National Party
371:Council of Europe (4 November 1950).
7:
96:, to be able to choose its members.
538:United Kingdom trade union case law
188:European Convention of Human Rights
14:
379:from the original on 6 March 2007
397:European Court of Human Rights:
518:2007 in United Kingdom case law
84:was a landmark case before the
483:BBC News report: Court verdict
203:European Court of Human Rights
180:European Court of Human Rights
86:European Court of Human Rights
30:European Court of Human Rights
1:
508:British trade unions history
237:, general secretary of the
564:
402:(Application no. 11002/05)
332:Demir and Baykara v Turkey
175:Employment Appeal Tribunal
162:Jay Lee took ASLEF to the
121:" (NF). In February 2002,
533:European Union labour law
478:ASLEF website on the case
455:A Casebook on Labour Law
359:A Casebook on Labour Law
88:and upheld the right of
548:2007 in labor relations
417:. ASLEF. Archived from
413:ASLEF (1 March 2007).
196:
173:ASLEF appealed to the
127:British National Party
115:
21:ASLEF v United Kingdom
457:(Hart 2018) ch 8, 351
375:. Council of Europe.
361:(Hart 2018) ch 8, 351
239:Trades Union Congress
56:Full text of judgment
421:on 29 September 2007
164:Employment Tribunal
125:, a member of the
335:(2009) 48 EHRR 54
74:
73:
555:
431:
430:
428:
426:
410:
404:
395:
389:
388:
386:
384:
368:
362:
355:
158:Domestic appeals
146:Anti-Nazi League
62:Court membership
39:27 February 2007
18:
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
493:
492:
464:
440:
435:
434:
424:
422:
412:
411:
407:
396:
392:
382:
380:
370:
369:
365:
356:
352:
347:
319:
232:
205:
160:
155:
102:
12:
11:
5:
561:
559:
551:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
515:
510:
505:
495:
494:
491:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
463:
462:External links
460:
459:
458:
451:
446:
439:
436:
433:
432:
405:
390:
363:
349:
348:
346:
343:
342:
341:
336:
328:
318:
315:
235:Brendan Barber
231:
228:
204:
201:
159:
156:
154:
151:
119:National Front
101:
98:
72:
71:
68:
67:Judges sitting
64:
63:
59:
58:
53:
49:
48:
45:
41:
40:
37:
33:
32:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
500:
498:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
465:
461:
456:
453:E McGaughey,
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
437:
420:
416:
409:
406:
403:
401:
394:
391:
378:
374:
367:
364:
360:
357:E McGaughey,
354:
351:
344:
340:
339:UK labour law
337:
334:
333:
329:
326:
325:
321:
320:
316:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
229:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
202:
200:
195:
191:
189:
185:
181:
176:
171:
169:
165:
157:
152:
150:
147:
143:
142:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
114:
109:
107:
99:
97:
95:
91:
87:
83:
80:
79:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
454:
423:. Retrieved
419:the original
408:
399:
393:
381:. Retrieved
366:
358:
353:
330:
322:
233:
230:Significance
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
197:
193:
172:
161:
139:
116:
111:
103:
92:, a British
77:
76:
75:
15:
94:trade union
497:Categories
438:References
184:Strasbourg
182:(ECHR, in
52:Transcript
291:Community
141:Spearhead
425:25 March
383:11 March
377:Archived
327:IRLR 568
317:See also
153:Judgment
82:ECHR 184
47:IRLR 361
44:Citation
123:Jay Lee
113:origin.
36:Decided
287:NUMAST
279:UNISON
259:NATFHE
136:Newham
131:Bexley
345:Notes
267:USDAW
255:UCATT
100:Facts
90:ASLEF
26:Court
427:2019
385:2007
309:and
263:NAPO
247:CYWU
104:The
311:NUJ
307:FBU
303:GMB
299:CSP
295:CWU
283:PCS
275:RMT
271:EIS
251:PFA
243:NUM
499::
313:.
305:,
301:,
297:,
293:,
289:,
285:,
281:,
277:,
273:,
269:,
265:,
261:,
257:,
253:,
249:,
245:,
429:.
387:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.