460:
It must be apparent to the judge that the record was made in the regular course of business, i.e., that it was customary practice to make such an entry and that the entrant had a duty to record it (either by law or by the terms of his employment). The record must have been made at or near the time
542:, directories, and other published compilations are considered generally admissible if they are generally used and relied upon by the public or by persons in particular occupations. Such information is considered admissible separate and apart from privately made business records described above.
442:
The basic rationale for the exception is that employees are under a duty to be accurate in observing, reporting, and recording business facts. The underlying belief is that special reliability is provided by the regularity with which the records are made and kept, as well as the incentive of
517:
by the victim was inadmissible, because it was not prepared in the regular course of business. Railroad travel, and not litigation, was the primary business of the railroad, and therefore the report was not considered sufficiently reliable to be admitted into evidence.
461:
of the act, event, or transaction at issue. Furthermore, the record must consist of matters either within the personal knowledge of the entrant or within the personal knowledge of someone with a duty to transmit the information to the entrant.
468:, 253 N.Y. 124, 170 N.E. 517 (1930), which held that a business record is admissible only when it is made by an employee about information, obtained by him, from an informant who himself was under a business duty to impart that information.
447:
or other penalty). The exception functions to allow the record to substitute for the in-court testimony of the employees, but it can only substitute for what the employee could testify about. The availability of the
128:
495:
530:
to prove that a transaction or occurrence had not taken place, if it was the regular practice of the business to record such events if they had actually occurred.
476:, and set a limitation on the use of such reports in court. Even though the police officer was under a duty to properly record the statements of an
480:, the informant himself was under no duty to report the events correctly, and therefore the informant's statement was still inadmissible hearsay.
405:
506:
627:
607:
572:
423:
313:
278:
181:
637:
632:
398:
452:(the employee whose testimony is being replaced by the record) is immaterial for the purposes of this exception.
444:
427:
191:
80:
318:
273:
133:
95:
75:
499:
391:
244:
148:
118:
113:
490:
254:
551:
229:
214:
157:
70:
65:
50:
234:
370:
219:
176:
138:
603:
526:
FRE 803(7) states the negative counterpart of the business records exception: the use of the
335:
298:
293:
239:
224:
123:
622:
330:
308:
283:
209:
186:
166:
60:
539:
303:
171:
104:
90:
576:
502:
249:
143:
22:
616:
473:
85:
55:
379:
365:
345:
324:
477:
449:
374:
45:
510:
355:
514:
263:
200:
573:"Federal Rules of Evidence -- 2010 | Federal Evidence Review"
360:
484:
Limitation on admissibility of records prepared for litigation
30:
595:
BarBri
Evidence Review outline, 2006, pp. 76–79.
554:, on Fourth Amendment protection for business records
443:
employees to keep accurate records (under threat of
513:company which was prepared in anticipation of a
602:. pp. 484–491. Foundation Press, 2002.
472:dealt specifically with the admissibility of
464:This last point was contested in the case of
399:
8:
430:(FRE). It is sometimes referred to as the
509:ruled that an accident report created by a
456:Reliability of the statements in the record
406:
392:
18:
564:
343:
262:
199:
156:
103:
37:
21:
538:Under FRE 803(17), market reports and
7:
507:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
534:Other types of business records
426:is based on Rule 803(6) of the
1:
314:Declaration against interest
182:Self-authenticating document
654:
522:Lack of record as evidence
420:business records exception
428:Federal Rules of Evidence
192:Hague Evidence Convention
81:Eyewitness identification
628:Law of the United States
319:Present sense impression
129:Public policy exclusions
96:Consciousness of guilt
245:Recorded recollection
552:Third-party doctrine
279:in United States law
432:business entry rule
119:Laying a foundation
638:Records management
633:Business documents
375:trusts and estates
255:Dead Man's Statute
220:Direct examination
177:Best evidence rule
598:Fisher, George.
505: (1943), the
491:Palmer v. Hoffman
424:U.S. hearsay rule
416:
415:
336:Implied assertion
299:Dying declaration
294:Excited utterance
240:Proffer agreement
225:Cross-examination
38:Types of evidence
645:
588:
587:
585:
584:
575:. Archived from
569:
528:lack of a record
408:
401:
394:
331:Learned treatise
309:Ancient document
289:Business records
187:Ancient document
167:Chain of custody
19:
16:U.S hearsay rule
653:
652:
648:
647:
646:
644:
643:
642:
613:
612:
592:
591:
582:
580:
571:
570:
566:
561:
548:
536:
524:
488:In the case of
486:
466:Johnson v. Lutz
458:
440:
412:
304:Party admission
172:Judicial notice
114:Burden of proof
56:Real (physical)
17:
12:
11:
5:
651:
649:
641:
640:
635:
630:
625:
615:
614:
611:
610:
596:
590:
589:
563:
562:
560:
557:
556:
555:
547:
544:
535:
532:
523:
520:
485:
482:
474:police reports
457:
454:
439:
436:
414:
413:
411:
410:
403:
396:
388:
385:
384:
383:
382:
377:
368:
363:
358:
350:
349:
341:
340:
339:
338:
333:
328:
321:
316:
311:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
276:
274:in English law
268:
267:
266:and exceptions
260:
259:
258:
257:
252:
250:Expert witness
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
204:
203:
197:
196:
195:
194:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
161:
160:
158:Authentication
154:
153:
152:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
108:
107:
101:
100:
99:
98:
93:
88:
83:
78:
73:
68:
63:
58:
53:
48:
40:
39:
35:
34:
26:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
650:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
621:
620:
618:
609:
608:1-58778-176-X
605:
601:
597:
594:
593:
579:on 2010-08-19
578:
574:
568:
565:
558:
553:
550:
549:
545:
543:
541:
533:
531:
529:
521:
519:
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
497:
493:
492:
483:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
462:
455:
453:
451:
446:
437:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
409:
404:
402:
397:
395:
390:
389:
387:
386:
381:
378:
376:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
347:
342:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
326:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
193:
190:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
164:
163:
162:
159:
155:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
111:
110:
109:
106:
102:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
86:Genetic (DNA)
84:
82:
79:
77:
76:Demonstrative
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
47:
44:
43:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:
24:
20:
599:
581:. Retrieved
577:the original
567:
537:
527:
525:
489:
487:
469:
465:
463:
459:
441:
431:
419:
417:
380:Criminal law
323:
288:
149:Similar fact
29:Part of the
445:termination
284:Confessions
235:Impeachment
124:Materiality
71:Inculpatory
66:Exculpatory
51:Documentary
617:Categories
583:2008-09-24
559:References
540:quotations
346:common law
325:Res gestae
210:Competence
134:Spoliation
478:informant
450:declarant
438:Rationale
215:Privilege
201:Witnesses
139:Character
105:Relevance
46:Testimony
600:Evidence
546:See also
511:railroad
366:Property
356:Contract
230:Redirect
23:Evidence
623:Hearsay
515:lawsuit
470:Johnson
422:to the
264:Hearsay
61:Digital
606:
344:Other
33:series
498:
371:Wills
348:areas
144:Habit
604:ISBN
500:U.S.
418:The
361:Tort
91:Lies
503:109
496:318
31:law
619::
494:,
434:.
373:,
586:.
407:e
400:t
393:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.