47:, and his predecessors Dais were appointed by valid ‘nass’ but on his death a controversy arose between members of the Dawoodi Bohras community as to whether or not "Badruddin appointed a successor by ‘Nas-e-Jali’ (a sort of declaration). Dispute between the parties to this particular property case arose on the point that a true Dai-ul-Mutlaq can only be a custodian of the property.
353:
161:
50:
The case was filed in 1925, by
Mahomed bhai and Taib ali. They died during course of time and new appellant were applied to attend the case. After years together when the hearing before their Lordships began in Privy Council, the appellant were Hasanali Jaffarji and Tahir bhai. They stated in
117:
to protract the case despite lack of mainstream recognition. On 23 April 2024, the Bombay high court dismissed the suit challenging Syedna
Mufaddal Saifuddin's position as the 53rd Dai-al-Mutlaq of the Dawoodi Bohra Community. The court dismissed Taher Fakhruddin(son of
283:
Waring, Kate (15 August 2014). "UK Charity
Commission's View regarding The Dawat-e-Hadiyah Trust". Herbert Smith Freehills Solicitors and Nabarro Solicitors (Charity Commission).
58:. The council finally came to the conclusion that ‘there is ample evidence upon which the fact of "Nas" can be inferred’ and, therefore, agreed that respondent 51st Dai Syedna
102:
228:
298:
178:
336:
307:
261:
210:
Hassanally, Yusuf
Mamujee (2017). "The 27th Dai al-Mutlaq, Ad-Da'il Ajal Syedna Dawood Burhanuddin bin Qutubshah bin Khwaja bin Ali".
192:
374:
238:
311:
69:
in which position of Dai-ul-mutlaq got further ascertained. In year 1591 AD also, in the court of Mughal emperor
54:
After due deliberations, the main question left to be decided by counsel in the case was whether respondent is a
403:
363:
408:
66:
32:
was filed to resolve the dispute arisen due to right to the use of certain waqf property belonging to
78:
337:"Bombay high court rejects Dawoodi Bohra succession suit, upholds Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin's claim"
233:
294:
269:
119:
106:
74:
44:
114:
70:
110:
59:
397:
165:
55:
33:
17:
229:"The Intricacies of Succession: Two Claimants Emerge for Dawoodi Bohra Leadership"
51:
evidence that they do not regard the defendant as truly appointed Dai-ul-Mutlaq.
196:
37:
352:
146:
81:'s accession. After much deliberation, Akbar eventually issued a royal
101:) in favor of Dai Qutub Shah, instead. In another instance in 2014,
164:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
346:
211:
300:
The Muslim 500: The World's 500 Most
Influential Muslims
122:)'s claim and upheld Syedna Mufaddal as Dai-ul-Mutlaq..
370:
179:"Unique case: From Akbar's court in 1591 to Bombay HC"
377:
to it so that it can be listed with similar articles.
216:. Colombo: Alvazaratus Saifiyah. pp. 110–115.
213:Gems of History: A Brief History of Doat Mutlaqeen
8:
147:"Hasanali vs Mansoorali on 1 December, 1947"
105:was contested by an opposing faction led by
86:
308:The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre
193:"History of Duat Mutlakin's of Ahmedabad"
131:
141:
139:
137:
135:
62:‘must be regarded as Dai-ul-Mutlaq’.
7:
362:needs additional or more specific
227:Mawani, Rizwan (30 January 2014).
65:There was a similar case known as
25:
351:
260:Bhutia, Lhendup G (3 Feb 2020).
159:
103:succession of Mufaddal Saifuddin
43:The 46th Dai-ul-Mutlaq, Syedha
262:"Uncertainty Among the Bohras"
1:
77:challenged 27th Dai Syedna
425:
149:. Bombay High Court. 1947
113:'s son, who moved the
67:Chandabhoy Galla Case
29:Burhanpur Dargah case
18:Burhanpur Dargah Case
241:on 27 September 2018
199:on 10 February 2001.
79:Dawood Bin Qutubshah
266:openthemagazine.com
234:The Huffington Post
120:Khuzaima Qutbuddin
109:, 51st Dai Syedna
107:Khuzaima Qutbuddin
75:Sulayman ibn Hasan
45:Mohammed Badruddin
392:
391:
375:adding categories
115:Bombay High Court
16:(Redirected from
416:
387:
384:
378:
355:
347:
341:
340:
339:. 23 April 2024.
333:
327:
326:
324:
322:
316:
310:. Archived from
305:
291:
285:
284:
280:
274:
273:
272:on 2 March 2020.
268:. Archived from
257:
251:
250:
248:
246:
237:. Archived from
224:
218:
217:
207:
201:
200:
195:. Archived from
189:
183:
182:
175:
169:
163:
162:
158:
156:
154:
143:
100:
97:
94:
91:
88:
71:Jalaluddin Akbar
21:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
404:Indian case law
394:
393:
388:
382:
379:
368:
356:
345:
344:
335:
334:
330:
320:
318:
317:on 12 June 2020
314:
303:
293:
292:
288:
282:
281:
277:
259:
258:
254:
244:
242:
226:
225:
221:
209:
208:
204:
191:
190:
186:
177:
176:
172:
160:
152:
150:
145:
144:
133:
128:
111:Taher Saifuddin
98:
95:
92:
89:
60:Taher Saifuddin
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
412:
411:
409:Dawoodi Bohras
406:
396:
395:
390:
389:
359:
357:
350:
343:
342:
328:
286:
275:
252:
219:
202:
184:
170:
130:
129:
127:
124:
36:, situated in
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
410:
407:
405:
402:
401:
399:
386:
376:
372:
366:
365:
360:This article
358:
354:
349:
348:
338:
332:
329:
313:
309:
302:
301:
296:
290:
287:
279:
276:
271:
267:
263:
256:
253:
240:
236:
235:
230:
223:
220:
215:
214:
206:
203:
198:
194:
188:
185:
180:
174:
171:
167:
166:public domain
148:
142:
140:
138:
136:
132:
125:
123:
121:
116:
112:
108:
104:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
63:
61:
57:
56:Dai-ul-Mutlaq
52:
48:
46:
41:
39:
35:
34:Dawoodi Bohra
31:
30:
19:
380:
361:
331:
319:. Retrieved
312:the original
299:
289:
278:
270:the original
265:
255:
243:. Retrieved
239:the original
232:
222:
212:
205:
197:the original
187:
173:
151:. Retrieved
82:
64:
53:
49:
42:
28:
27:
26:
383:August 2024
245:11 February
398:Categories
364:categories
126:References
295:Schleifer
40:, India.
38:Burhanpur
371:help out
369:Please
297:(ed.).
90:
321:12 Jun
96:decree
83:farman
315:(PDF)
304:(PDF)
153:7 May
323:2020
247:2014
155:2024
87:lit.
373:by
73:,
400::
306:.
264:.
231:.
134:^
385:)
381:(
367:.
325:.
249:.
181:.
168:.
157:.
99:'
93:'
85:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.