157:
152:, could not conceivably commit a criminal offence; but he was nevertheless subject to the criminal law, and this fact involved no slur. So, too, in theory the Mullaji Saheb was amenable to the criminal and civil law of this country, though it was unthinkable that he would commit any offence. But the existence of this civil restraint is no more a slur upon an honest trustee, than the existence of criminal restraint is upon an honest citizen. The test of a trust is not whether the alleged trustee can ever commit a breach of trust, which is what the defendants' contention in effect amounts to."
174:"Looking back on the proceedings, I think what impressed me the most, even more than the extravagance of the claims, was the personality of the Mullaji, a frail looking figure possessed nevertheless of an iron will, great determination, and organising capacity. At the time he assumed office the administration must have been extremely slack. Yet he managed in a very few years not only to pull the administration together but to obtain a hold upon his followers greater perhaps than that of any of his predecessors."
247:
to protract the case despite lack of mainstream recognition.On 23 April 2024, the Bombay high court dismissed the suit challenging Syedna
Mufaddal Saifuddin's position as the 53rd Dai-al-Mutlaq of the Dawoodi Bohra Community. The court dismissed Taher Fakhruddin(son of
116:
that the case is remarkable not only for its length, but for the amazing claims put forward on behalf of the 'Mullaji' (Taher
Saifuddin), the like of which have never been put forward in any Court of Law.
19:
set a significant precedent on the issue of a human's claim to being infallible, immaculate, executor of God's will, and trusteeship of God's funds. The case was filed in 1917, during the
519:
Waring, Kate (15 August 2014). "UK Charity
Commission's View regarding The Dawat-e-Hadiyah Trust". Herbert Smith Freehills Solicitors and Nabarro Solicitors (Charity Commission).
200:, contains religious truths known to a very few. And an even higher class of knowledge which is with the Dai al-Mutlaq exclusively that they pass on only to their successors.
148:"...high-ranking people could be trusted not to commit criminal breach of trust; but that did not mean that they were beyond the pale of the law. For example, His Grace the
236:
136:
based his judgement on religious texts to hold that all properties (in respect of which the declaration was sought) were devoted to charitable purposes, and that the
464:
534:
414:
606:
547:
497:
185:
446:
Hassanally, Yusuf
Mamujee (2017). "The 27th Dai al-Mutlaq, Ad-Da'il Ajal Syedna Dawood Burhanuddin bin Qutubshah bin Khwaja bin Ali".
313:
555:
156:
129:
286:
100:, who was revered as a miraculous Saint, was challenged on the plea of improper chain of succession from 47th Dai al-Mutlaq,
428:
474:
561:
375:
28:
397:
626:
352:
149:
631:
125:
101:
401:
371:
212:
24:
607:"Bombay high court rejects Dawoodi Bohra succession suit, upholds Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin's claim"
469:
60:
56:
580:
530:
505:
249:
240:
208:
551:
309:
282:
244:
329:
204:
32:
592:
140:(Taher Saifuddin) was sole trustee thereof, and also that, despite his infallibility, the
40:
178:
During Taher
Saifuddin's testimony, he clarified about existence of knowledge classes of
108:
raised during the case, however; were of greater importance than the trusteeship of the
133:
44:
132:
could be questioned, and by extension, their trusteeship of all religious properties.
620:
179:
65:
36:
121:
465:"The Intricacies of Succession: Two Claimants Emerge for Dawoodi Bohra Leadership"
333:
303:
276:
272:
20:
432:
305:
Modern
History of the Ismailis: Continuity and Change in a Muslim Community
48:
379:
215:'s accession. After much deliberation, Akbar eventually issued a royal
70:
160:
Transcript of testimony by the defendant in the
Chandabhoy Galla Case
543:
393:
The
Advocate General Of Bombay vs Yusufalli Ebrahim on 19 March, 1921
367:
The
Advocate General Of Bombay vs Yusufalli Ebrahim on 19 March, 1921
191:
97:
278:
Mullahs on the
Mainframe: Islam and Modernity Among the Daudi Bohras
155:
52:
235:) in favor of Qutub Shah, instead. In another instance in 2014,
43:. In 1921, Saifuddin won the case on basis of the belief that
447:
203:
A similar case was brought to the court of Mughal emperor,
196:: First two of the three are known to many but the third,
536:
The Muslim 500: The World's 500 Most Influential Muslims
252:)'s claim and upheld Syedna Mufaddal as Dai-ul-Mutlaq..
415:"Unique case: From Akbar's court in 1591 to Bombay HC"
104:'s appointment. Issues pertaining to the office of
452:. Colombo: Alvazaratus Saifiyah. pp. 110–115.
449:Gems of History: A Brief History of Doat Mutlaqeen
112:itself. Sir Thomas Strangman observes in his book
353:"Mullaji Case (Chandabhoy Gulla Case)-19l8-19l9"
35:'s family against the 51st Dai al-Mutlaq of the
170:Upon conclusion of the case, Strangman noted:
8:
281:. University of Chicago Press. p. 236.
239:was contested by an opposing faction led by
220:
81:
76:The trusteeship of the money donated via a
548:The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre
144:remained accountable to the Court of Law:
69:(and hence Saifuddin), in accordance with
429:"History of Duat Mutlakin's of Ahmedabad"
243:, Taher Saifuddin's son, who moved the
347:
345:
264:
588:
578:
96:) kept near the tomb of Chandabhoy in
51:and through him the representative of
496:Bhutia, Lhendup G (3 February 2020).
7:
463:Mawani, Rizwan (30 January 2014).
14:
61:entrust someone to represent them
57:having withdrawn from public life
237:succession of Mufaddal Saifuddin
124:not upheld by the court in the
498:"Uncertainty Among the Bohras"
1:
338:– via books.google.com.
318:– via books.google.com.
302:Daftary, Farhad, ed. (2010).
291:– via books.google.com.
161:
128:, validity of the subsequent
335:Indian Courts and Characters
120:Had Abdul Qadir Najmuddin's
114:Indian Courts and Characters
47:, as representative of the
648:
29:Advocate General of Bombay
17:The Chandabhoy Galla Case
150:Archbishop of Canterbury
167:
531:Schleifer, S Abdallah
398:52 Justice Marten
159:
126:Burhanpur Dargah Case
102:Abdul Qadir Najmuddin
21:British rule of India
477:on 27 September 2018
435:on 10 February 2001.
402:High Court of Bombay
378:, archived from
372:High Court of Bombay
213:Dawood Bin Qutubshah
25:Sir Thomas Strangman
502:openthemagazine.com
470:The Huffington Post
31:, at the behest of
250:Khuzaima Qutbuddin
241:Khuzaima Qutbuddin
209:Sulayman ibn Hasan
168:
73:religious belief.
330:Strangman, Thomas
245:Bombay High Court
130:Duat al-Mutlaqeen
639:
611:
610:
609:. 23 April 2024.
603:
597:
596:
590:
586:
584:
576:
574:
572:
566:
560:. Archived from
541:
527:
521:
520:
516:
510:
509:
508:on 2 March 2020.
504:. Archived from
493:
487:
486:
484:
482:
473:. Archived from
460:
454:
453:
443:
437:
436:
431:. Archived from
425:
419:
418:
411:
405:
395:
389:
383:
374: 1922),
369:
363:
357:
356:
349:
340:
339:
326:
320:
319:
299:
293:
292:
269:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
205:Jalaluddin Akbar
166:
163:
95:
92:
89:
86:
83:
33:Adamjee Peerbhoy
647:
646:
642:
641:
640:
638:
637:
636:
627:Indian case law
617:
616:
615:
614:
605:
604:
600:
587:
577:
570:
568:
567:on 12 June 2020
564:
558:
539:
529:
528:
524:
518:
517:
513:
495:
494:
490:
480:
478:
462:
461:
457:
445:
444:
440:
427:
426:
422:
413:
412:
408:
400:, 280-284 (
391:
390:
386:
365:
364:
360:
351:
350:
343:
328:
327:
323:
316:
301:
300:
296:
289:
271:
270:
266:
261:
255:
232:
229:
226:
223:
164:
93:
90:
87:
84:
41:Taher Saifuddin
12:
11:
5:
645:
643:
635:
634:
632:Dawoodi Bohras
629:
619:
618:
613:
612:
598:
589:|website=
556:
533:, ed. (2019).
522:
511:
488:
455:
438:
420:
406:
384:
358:
341:
321:
315:978-0857735263
314:
308:. Bloomsbury.
294:
287:
263:
262:
260:
257:
207:, in 1591, as
176:
175:
154:
153:
134:Justice Marten
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
644:
633:
630:
628:
625:
624:
622:
608:
602:
599:
594:
582:
563:
559:
557:9789957635459
553:
549:
545:
538:
537:
532:
526:
523:
515:
512:
507:
503:
499:
492:
489:
476:
472:
471:
466:
459:
456:
451:
450:
442:
439:
434:
430:
424:
421:
416:
410:
407:
403:
399:
394:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
362:
359:
354:
348:
346:
342:
337:
336:
331:
325:
322:
317:
311:
307:
306:
298:
295:
290:
284:
280:
279:
274:
268:
265:
258:
256:
253:
251:
246:
242:
238:
218:
214:
210:
206:
201:
199:
195:
194:
189:
188:
183:
182:
173:
172:
171:
158:
151:
147:
146:
145:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
115:
111:
107:
106:Dai al-Mutlaq
103:
99:
79:
74:
72:
68:
67:
66:Dai al-Mutlaq
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:Dawoodi Bohra
34:
30:
26:
22:
18:
601:
569:. Retrieved
562:the original
535:
525:
514:
506:the original
501:
491:
479:. Retrieved
475:the original
468:
458:
448:
441:
433:the original
423:
409:
392:
387:
380:the original
366:
361:
334:
324:
304:
297:
277:
273:Blank, Jonah
267:
254:
216:
202:
197:
192:
186:
180:
177:
169:
141:
137:
119:
113:
109:
105:
91:donation box
77:
75:
64:
16:
15:
481:11 February
404: 1922).
211:challenged
165: 1920
122:appointment
621:Categories
288:0226056767
259:References
591:ignored (
581:cite book
332:(1931).
275:(2001).
571:12 June
355:. 1919.
224:
198:Haqiqat
193:Haqiqat
142:Mullaji
138:Mullaji
85:
71:Tayyibi
59:, must
49:Prophet
554:
544:Jordan
396:,
370: (
312:
285:
230:decree
217:farman
190:, and
98:Bombay
27:, the
565:(PDF)
540:(PDF)
187:Tawil
181:Zahir
110:Galla
78:Galla
23:, by
593:help
573:2020
552:ISBN
483:2014
376:Text
310:ISBN
283:ISBN
221:lit.
82:lit.
63:the
45:Imam
53:God
623::
585::
583:}}
579:{{
550:.
546::
542:.
500:.
467:.
344:^
184:,
162:c.
55:,
39:,
595:)
575:.
485:.
417:.
382:.
233:'
227:'
219:(
94:'
88:'
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.