36:, and his predecessors Dais were appointed by valid ‘nass’ but on his death a controversy arose between members of the Dawoodi Bohras community as to whether or not "Badruddin appointed a successor by ‘Nas-e-Jali’ (a sort of declaration). Dispute between the parties to this particular property case arose on the point that a true Dai-ul-Mutlaq can only be a custodian of the property.
342:
150:
39:
The case was filed in 1925, by
Mahomed bhai and Taib ali. They died during course of time and new appellant were applied to attend the case. After years together when the hearing before their Lordships began in Privy Council, the appellant were Hasanali Jaffarji and Tahir bhai. They stated in
106:
to protract the case despite lack of mainstream recognition. On 23 April 2024, the Bombay high court dismissed the suit challenging Syedna
Mufaddal Saifuddin's position as the 53rd Dai-al-Mutlaq of the Dawoodi Bohra Community. The court dismissed Taher Fakhruddin(son of
272:
Waring, Kate (15 August 2014). "UK Charity
Commission's View regarding The Dawat-e-Hadiyah Trust". Herbert Smith Freehills Solicitors and Nabarro Solicitors (Charity Commission).
47:. The council finally came to the conclusion that ‘there is ample evidence upon which the fact of "Nas" can be inferred’ and, therefore, agreed that respondent 51st Dai Syedna
91:
217:
287:
167:
325:
296:
250:
199:
Hassanally, Yusuf
Mamujee (2017). "The 27th Dai al-Mutlaq, Ad-Da'il Ajal Syedna Dawood Burhanuddin bin Qutubshah bin Khwaja bin Ali".
181:
363:
227:
300:
58:
in which position of Dai-ul-mutlaq got further ascertained. In year 1591 AD also, in the court of Mughal emperor
43:
After due deliberations, the main question left to be decided by counsel in the case was whether respondent is a
392:
352:
397:
55:
21:
was filed to resolve the dispute arisen due to right to the use of certain waqf property belonging to
67:
326:"Bombay high court rejects Dawoodi Bohra succession suit, upholds Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin's claim"
222:
283:
258:
108:
95:
63:
33:
103:
59:
99:
48:
386:
154:
44:
22:
218:"The Intricacies of Succession: Two Claimants Emerge for Dawoodi Bohra Leadership"
40:
evidence that they do not regard the defendant as truly appointed Dai-ul-Mutlaq.
185:
26:
341:
135:
70:'s accession. After much deliberation, Akbar eventually issued a royal
90:) in favor of Dai Qutub Shah, instead. In another instance in 2014,
153:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
335:
200:
289:
The Muslim 500: The World's 500 Most
Influential Muslims
111:)'s claim and upheld Syedna Mufaddal as Dai-ul-Mutlaq..
359:
168:"Unique case: From Akbar's court in 1591 to Bombay HC"
366:
to it so that it can be listed with similar articles.
205:. Colombo: Alvazaratus Saifiyah. pp. 110–115.
202:Gems of History: A Brief History of Doat Mutlaqeen
8:
136:"Hasanali vs Mansoorali on 1 December, 1947"
94:was contested by an opposing faction led by
75:
297:The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre
182:"History of Duat Mutlakin's of Ahmedabad"
120:
130:
128:
126:
124:
51:‘must be regarded as Dai-ul-Mutlaq’.
7:
351:needs additional or more specific
216:Mawani, Rizwan (30 January 2014).
54:There was a similar case known as
14:
340:
249:Bhutia, Lhendup G (3 Feb 2020).
148:
92:succession of Mufaddal Saifuddin
32:The 46th Dai-ul-Mutlaq, Syedha
251:"Uncertainty Among the Bohras"
1:
66:challenged 27th Dai Syedna
414:
138:. Bombay High Court. 1947
102:'s son, who moved the
56:Chandabhoy Galla Case
18:Burhanpur Dargah case
230:on 27 September 2018
188:on 10 February 2001.
68:Dawood Bin Qutubshah
255:openthemagazine.com
223:The Huffington Post
109:Khuzaima Qutbuddin
98:, 51st Dai Syedna
96:Khuzaima Qutbuddin
64:Sulayman ibn Hasan
34:Mohammed Badruddin
381:
380:
364:adding categories
104:Bombay High Court
405:
376:
373:
367:
344:
336:
330:
329:
328:. 23 April 2024.
322:
316:
315:
313:
311:
305:
299:. Archived from
294:
280:
274:
273:
269:
263:
262:
261:on 2 March 2020.
257:. Archived from
246:
240:
239:
237:
235:
226:. Archived from
213:
207:
206:
196:
190:
189:
184:. Archived from
178:
172:
171:
164:
158:
152:
151:
147:
145:
143:
132:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
60:Jalaluddin Akbar
413:
412:
408:
407:
406:
404:
403:
402:
393:Indian case law
383:
382:
377:
371:
368:
357:
345:
334:
333:
324:
323:
319:
309:
307:
306:on 12 June 2020
303:
292:
282:
281:
277:
271:
270:
266:
248:
247:
243:
233:
231:
215:
214:
210:
198:
197:
193:
180:
179:
175:
166:
165:
161:
149:
141:
139:
134:
133:
122:
117:
100:Taher Saifuddin
87:
84:
81:
78:
49:Taher Saifuddin
12:
11:
5:
411:
409:
401:
400:
398:Dawoodi Bohras
395:
385:
384:
379:
378:
348:
346:
339:
332:
331:
317:
275:
264:
241:
208:
191:
173:
159:
119:
118:
116:
113:
25:, situated in
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
410:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
388:
375:
365:
361:
355:
354:
349:This article
347:
343:
338:
337:
327:
321:
318:
302:
298:
291:
290:
285:
279:
276:
268:
265:
260:
256:
252:
245:
242:
229:
225:
224:
219:
212:
209:
204:
203:
195:
192:
187:
183:
177:
174:
169:
163:
160:
156:
155:public domain
137:
131:
129:
127:
125:
121:
114:
112:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
52:
50:
46:
45:Dai-ul-Mutlaq
41:
37:
35:
30:
28:
24:
23:Dawoodi Bohra
20:
19:
369:
350:
320:
308:. Retrieved
301:the original
288:
278:
267:
259:the original
254:
244:
232:. Retrieved
228:the original
221:
211:
201:
194:
186:the original
176:
162:
140:. Retrieved
71:
53:
42:
38:
31:
17:
16:
15:
372:August 2024
234:11 February
387:Categories
353:categories
115:References
284:Schleifer
29:, India.
27:Burhanpur
360:help out
358:Please
286:(ed.).
79:
310:12 Jun
85:decree
72:farman
304:(PDF)
293:(PDF)
142:7 May
312:2020
236:2014
144:2024
76:lit.
362:by
62:,
389::
295:.
253:.
220:.
123:^
374:)
370:(
356:.
314:.
238:.
170:.
157:.
146:.
88:'
82:'
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.