129:
we feel that it is obnoxious to their views and to the views of a great multitude of people. We would like that clause to be put in, or a condition of that kind to be understood.’ If the BBC refused to put in such a condition, or refused to negotiate about it, that might be a trade dispute.... But the matter never reached that stage at all.... It was coercive interference and nothing more. If that is the right view, it means that the trade union and its officers are not exempt from the ordinary rule of law – which is that men must honour their contracts, and must not unlawfully interfere with the performance of them.
128:
To become a trade dispute, there would have to be something of the kind which was discussed in the course of argument before us: ‘We would like you to consider putting a clause in the contract by which our members are not bound to take part in any broadcast which may be viewed in South Africa because
355:
260:
238:
184:
438:
159:
318:
359:
448:
225:
197:
152:
278:
292:
304:
145:
91:
333:
344:
443:
211:
124:
held that the injunction was to be granted, because it was not strictly a dispute over terms and conditions of work.
249:
106:
369:
95:
63:
268:
187:
175:
121:
229:
215:
201:
264:
113:
held that the proposed action was in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute.
432:
392:
381:
59:
308:
99:
409:
324:
282:
137:
67:
110:
87:
83:
98:. ABS objected to transmission unless the BBC agreed to not broadcast to
141:
79:
66:
and the scope of a "trade dispute" under what is now
41:
33:
25:
20:
126:
153:
8:
160:
146:
138:
17:
439:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
320:Young, James and Webster v United Kingdom
226:R (National Union of Journalists) v CAC
198:Fullarton Computer Industries Ltd v CAC
279:CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service
7:
400:1 AC 191 at 227, 233–234, approving
293:Fitzpatrick v British Railways Board
305:Wilson and Palmer v United Kingdom
47:Trade union, collective bargaining
14:
398:Hadmor Productions Ltd v Hamilton
92:Association of Broadcasting Staff
94:from stopping broadcast of the
449:United Kingdom labour case law
1:
334:Employment Relations Act 1999
168:Collective bargaining sources
345:NUGSAT v Albury Brothers Ltd
212:R (Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd) v CAC
465:
378:
366:
353:
341:
331:
315:
301:
289:
275:
258:
246:
236:
222:
208:
194:
182:
173:
46:
250:Gallagher v Post Office
131:
444:Lord Denning cases
388:
387:
370:Luce v Bexley LBC
96:1977 FA Cup Final
64:collective action
62:case, concerning
51:
50:
456:
321:
162:
155:
148:
139:
18:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
429:
428:
423:
418:
389:
384:
374:
362:
349:
337:
327:
319:
311:
297:
285:
271:
254:
242:
232:
218:
204:
190:
178:
176:ECHR article 11
169:
166:
136:
122:Lord Denning MR
119:
76:
29:Court of Appeal
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
452:
451:
446:
441:
431:
430:
427:
426:
422:
419:
417:
414:
413:
412:
407:Re P (a minor)
404:
395:
386:
385:
379:
376:
375:
367:
364:
363:
354:
351:
350:
342:
339:
338:
332:
329:
328:
316:
313:
312:
302:
299:
298:
290:
287:
286:
276:
273:
272:
259:
256:
255:
247:
244:
243:
237:
234:
233:
223:
220:
219:
209:
206:
205:
195:
192:
191:
183:
180:
179:
174:
171:
170:
167:
165:
164:
157:
150:
142:
135:
132:
118:
115:
75:
72:
49:
48:
44:
43:
39:
38:
35:
31:
30:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
436:
434:
425:
424:
420:
415:
411:
408:
405:
403:
399:
396:
394:
393:UK labour law
391:
390:
383:
377:
372:
371:
365:
361:
357:
352:
347:
346:
340:
335:
330:
326:
323:
322:
314:
310:
307:
306:
300:
295:
294:
288:
284:
281:
280:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
252:
251:
245:
240:
235:
231:
230:EWCA Civ 1309
228:
227:
221:
217:
214:
213:
207:
203:
200:
199:
193:
189:
186:
181:
177:
172:
163:
158:
156:
151:
149:
144:
143:
140:
133:
130:
125:
123:
116:
114:
112:
108:
103:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
73:
71:
70:section 244.
69:
65:
61:
60:UK labour law
58:ICR 685 is a
57:
56:
45:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
16:
406:
401:
397:
368:
343:
317:
303:
291:
277:
253:3 All ER 712
248:
224:
216:EWCA Civ 512
210:
196:
127:
120:
104:
100:South Africa
86:to restrain
77:
54:
53:
52:
15:
356:TULRCA 1992
261:TULRCA 1992
239:TULRCA 1992
202:Scot CS 168
185:TULRCA 1992
68:TULRCA 1992
55:BBC v Hearn
21:BBC v Hearn
433:Categories
421:References
107:High Court
84:injunction
82:wanted an
382:UK labour
336:ss 10-15
309:ECHR 552
134:See also
117:Judgment
90:and the
42:Keywords
34:Citation
373:ICR 591
360:168-170
296:ICR 221
265:137-166
105:In the
37:ICR 685
410:UKHL 8
348:ICR 84
325:ECHR 4
283:UKHL 6
188:Sch A1
111:Pain J
416:Notes
402:Hearn
241:s 179
88:Hearn
74:Facts
26:Court
380:see
267:and
78:The
358:ss
269:275
263:ss
80:BBC
435::
109:,
102:.
161:e
154:t
147:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.