39:
149:... a proper reading of para 35 means that a collective bargaining agreement can be brought into force voluntarily between an employer and a union even where the union has no significant support in the bargaining unit. Where that has happened there is nothing in Schedule A1 of the 1992 Act that allows the CAC to require the employer to enter into another recognition agreement with a union that does have majority support.
128:. It signed an agreement for the Sports Division of the Mirror in 2003, shutting out the NUJ. They only had one member in the Sports Division. A majority of people in the bargaining unit were in favour of statutory recognition of the NUJ. The NUJ argued an agreement should not be considered ‘already in force’ for the purpose of paragraph 35, and in any case the CAC decision breached
180:
It is clear to me, as I believe it to have been clear to the constitution of this court that gave permission for this appeal, that the right to be recognised for the purposes of collective bargaining does not fall within the rights guaranteed by
Article
166:
held that the smaller collective agreement prevented another one supervening. ‘Already in force’ should take its natural meaning, and it did not matter that collective agreements were not binding.
417:
322:
300:
246:
113:
129:
503:
221:
380:
508:
421:
498:
287:
259:
214:
154:
Were the BAJ a non-independent trade union, which it is not, its recognition by the
Company could be challenged under Part VI of the Schedule.
340:
38:
354:
176:. Just because one union had an agreement ahead of another did not mean the first suffered discrimination, so art 14 did not apply either.
49:
116:, Schedule A1, paragraph 35. This prescribes that where a collective agreement is ‘already in force’ the procedure cannot take place. The
366:
207:
395:
117:
103:
406:
121:
273:
124:. The BAJ formed in the early 1990s as a breakaway from the NUJ, but is independent and not affiliated to the
311:
120:
had decided this was the situation since the Mirror News Group already had a recognition agreement with the
163:
125:
91:
17:
431:
472:
330:
249:
237:
173:
83:
291:
59:
277:
263:
326:
492:
454:
443:
189:
87:
370:
185:
386:
344:
199:
168:
108:
172:
was considered, but the right to recognition did not fall within the scope of
145:
Hodge J held there was no need to recognise the NUJ. He said the following.
79:
R (National Union of
Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee
32:
R (National Union of
Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee
203:
114:
Trade Union and Labour
Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
106:
contended that its application for recognition at the
130:
Article 11 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
65:
55:
45:
31:
178:
147:
215:
8:
222:
208:
200:
37:
28:
504:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
382:Young, James and Webster v United Kingdom
112:newspaper was not inadmissible under the
465:
288:R (National Union of Journalists) v CAC
260:Fullarton Computer Industries Ltd v CAC
18:R (National Union of Journalists) v CAC
341:CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service
7:
355:Fitzpatrick v British Railways Board
50:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
367:Wilson and Palmer v United Kingdom
122:British Association of Journalists
71:Trade union, collective bargaining
25:
509:2005 in United Kingdom case law
499:United Kingdom labour case law
1:
396:Employment Relations Act 1999
230:Collective bargaining sources
118:Central Arbitration Committee
407:NUGSAT v Albury Brothers Ltd
84:[2005] EWCA Civ 1309
274:R (Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd) v CAC
525:
440:
428:
415:
403:
393:
377:
363:
351:
337:
320:
308:
298:
284:
270:
256:
244:
235:
70:
36:
312:Gallagher v Post Office
183:
156:
126:Trades Union Congress
92:collective bargaining
473:EWHC 2612 (Admin)
450:
449:
432:Luce v Bexley LBC
90:case, concerning
75:
74:
16:(Redirected from
516:
475:
470:
383:
224:
217:
210:
201:
132:and Article 14.
41:
29:
21:
524:
523:
519:
518:
517:
515:
514:
513:
489:
488:
483:
478:
471:
467:
463:
451:
446:
436:
424:
411:
399:
389:
381:
373:
359:
347:
333:
316:
304:
294:
280:
266:
252:
240:
238:ECHR article 11
231:
228:
198:
174:ECHR article 11
161:
159:Court of Appeal
143:
138:
100:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
522:
520:
512:
511:
506:
501:
491:
490:
487:
486:
482:
479:
477:
476:
464:
462:
459:
458:
457:
448:
447:
441:
438:
437:
429:
426:
425:
416:
413:
412:
404:
401:
400:
394:
391:
390:
378:
375:
374:
364:
361:
360:
352:
349:
348:
338:
335:
334:
321:
318:
317:
309:
306:
305:
299:
296:
295:
285:
282:
281:
271:
268:
267:
257:
254:
253:
245:
242:
241:
236:
233:
232:
229:
227:
226:
219:
212:
204:
197:
194:
160:
157:
142:
139:
137:
134:
99:
96:
73:
72:
68:
67:
63:
62:
57:
53:
52:
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
521:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
496:
494:
485:
484:
480:
474:
469:
466:
460:
456:
455:UK labour law
453:
452:
445:
439:
434:
433:
427:
423:
419:
414:
409:
408:
402:
397:
392:
388:
385:
384:
376:
372:
369:
368:
362:
357:
356:
350:
346:
343:
342:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
314:
313:
307:
302:
297:
293:
292:EWCA Civ 1309
290:
289:
283:
279:
276:
275:
269:
265:
262:
261:
255:
251:
248:
243:
239:
234:
225:
220:
218:
213:
211:
206:
205:
202:
195:
193:
191:
187:
182:
177:
175:
171:
170:
165:
158:
155:
152:
150:
146:
140:
135:
133:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
105:
97:
95:
93:
89:
88:UK labour law
85:
81:
80:
69:
64:
61:
60:EWCA Civ 1309
58:
54:
51:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
468:
430:
405:
379:
365:
353:
339:
315:3 All ER 712
310:
286:
278:EWCA Civ 512
272:
258:
184:
179:
167:
162:
153:
151:
148:
144:
107:
101:
78:
77:
76:
26:
418:TULRCA 1992
323:TULRCA 1992
301:TULRCA 1992
264:Scot CS 168
247:TULRCA 1992
169:Wilson v UK
109:Racing Post
493:Categories
481:References
141:High Court
444:UK labour
190:Nourse LJ
186:Latham LJ
164:Buxton LJ
398:ss 10-15
371:ECHR 552
196:See also
192:agreed.
136:Judgment
66:Keywords
56:Citation
435:ICR 591
422:168-170
358:ICR 221
327:137-166
410:ICR 84
387:ECHR 4
345:UKHL 6
250:Sch A1
461:Notes
303:s 179
98:Facts
86:is a
82:
46:Court
442:see
329:and
188:and
102:The
420:ss
331:275
325:ss
181:11.
104:NUJ
495::
94:.
223:e
216:t
209:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
