397:
Barker's reason was his gambling on
Manning's acquittal (the evidence against Manning not being strong as evidenced by two hung juries and two appellate court reversals), believing that if Manning was acquitted, he would never be tried (which Barker's counsel also conceded at oral argument). The Court further noted that, after Barker's counsel objected to the February 1962 continuance, he did not object to the June or September 1962 continuances; only in March 1963, after Manning's convictions became final, were objections raised to further continuances (this time brought about by the ex-sheriff's illness, which Barker conceded was a justifiable reason).
343:
lesser offense. The Court also noted that persons released on bond had the opportunity to commit further crimes, "the longer an accused is free awaiting trial, the more tempting becomes his opportunity to jump bail and escape", and that "delay between arrest and punishment may have a detrimental effect on rehabilitation." The Court also noted that if the accused cannot make bail, that too can make rehabilitation difficult, that a lengthy pre-trial detention can be costly, and that "society loses wages which might have been earned, and it must often support families of incarcerated breadwinners."
31:
275:
the 15th continuance (March 1963 on the date of Barker's trial; the prosecution sought a continuance due to illness of the former sheriff, the chief investigating officer in the case) as well as the 16th continuance (June 1963, requested for the sheriff's continued illness; while granting the continuance the
Circuit Court ruled that the matter had to come to trial at the next term or would be dismissed for lack of prosecution).
478:
June 1961 (#10), September 1961 (#11), February 1962 (#12), June 1962 (#13), September 1962 (#14), March 1963 (at the beginning of the Court's term in
February 1963, the prosecution moved to set the trial date for March 19 of that year, but when that date arrived the prosecution requested and was granted Continuance #15), and June 1963 (#16).
362:) was to "hold that the Constitution requires a criminal defendant to be offered a trial within a specified time period." The Court rejected this approach, stating that there was "no constitutional basis for holding that the speedy trial right can be quantified into a specified number of days or months."
589:
The Court also stated that some delay to secure
Manning's testimony against Barker would have been permissible, "but more than four years was too long a period, particularly since a good part of that period was attributable to the Commonwealth's failure or inability to try Manning under circumstances
342:
First, the Court noted that "there is a societal interest in providing a speedy trial which exists separate from, and at times in opposition to, the interests of the accused". The Court commented on the backlog of cases, mainly in urban courts, that often enable defendants to negotiate a plea for a
274:
Barker, through his counsel, did not object to any of the first eleven continuances. But on the 12th continuance (February 1962) Barker's counsel filed a motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, which was rejected. Barker's counsel did not object to the 13th or 14th continuances, but objected to
467:
trials before
Manning was convicted of both murders. The first and fourth trials ended in a hung jury. The second trial resulted in a conviction but was overturned on grounds of illegally obtained evidence. The third trial also resulted in a conviction but was overturned on grounds of failure to
365:
The other approach was to "restrict consideration of the right to those cases in which the accused has demanded a speedy trial." In other words, if the defendant did not specifically demand a trial, the defendant waived his/her right to appeal the matter. The Court also rejected this approach, as
346:
Second, the Court noted that "deprivation of the right may work to the accused's advantage." As the time between arrest and trial lengthens, witnesses may become unavailable and/or their memories fade; if the witnesses were for the prosecution the case may be seriously weakened (as the prosecution
317:
affirmed the
District Court's decision in 1971. The Sixth Circuit argued that Barker had waived any speedy trial claims up through February 1963 (which the Sixth Circuit erroneously believed was the first date that Barker's counsel objected to a further continuance) and that the eight-month period
396:
However, the Court also ruled that Barker was not prejudiced by the delay, since none of Barker's witnesses were harmed by the delay. More importantly, the Court determined that Barker did not want a speedy trial (a fact that Barker's counsel conceded at oral argument). The Court speculated that
477:
Continuances were granted in the Barker case in
October 1958 (#1), February 1959 (#2, in an exception to the pattern this continuance was granted for one month only), March 1959 (#3), June 1959 (#4), September 1959 (#5), February 1960 (#6), June 1960 (#7), September 1960 (#8), February 1961 (#9),
270:
The prosecution, however, encountered numerous difficulties in getting a conviction against
Manning; it would not be until December 1962 that Manning would be convicted in the second of the two murders. As the Christian County Circuit Court only held three terms each year (in February, June, and
392:
Taking these factors into consideration, though, Barker's conviction was upheld. The court agreed that the period of time between initial arrest and trial – over five years – was "extraordinary" and that only seven months of the delay was justifiable (the period of the ex-sheriff's
266:
to not incriminate himself), the prosecution chose to try
Manning first, hoping that once convicted, Manning would later voluntarily testify against Barker. At the outset of Manning's trial on October 23, 1958, the prosecution sought and obtained the first of what would be 16 continuances in
278:
The final trial date was set for
October 9, 1963 and on that date, after Barker's counsel made another unsuccessful motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, the trial was finally commenced; with Manning the chief prosecution witness, Barker was convicted and given a life sentence.
370:
the Court ruled that "resuming waiver from a silent record is impermissible. The record must show, or there must be an allegation and evidence which show, that an accused was offered counsel but intelligently and understandably rejected the offer. Anything less is not
514:
The Court specifically commented that "t must be of little comfort to the residents of Christian County, Kentucky, to know that Barker was at large on bail for over four years while accused of a vicious and brutal murder of which he was ultimately
318:
between February and October 1963 (the period between the objection and the actual trial) was not unduly long. Further, the Sixth Circuit ruled that granting a continuance based on the sheriff's illness was a justifiable reason for a delay.
350:
Finally, the Court noted that the concept is more vague than with other rights, in that the Court "cannot definitely say how long is too long in a system where justice is supposed to be swift but deliberate."
301:
247:. The Court held that determinations of whether or not the right to a speedy trial has been violated must be made on a case-by-case basis, and set forth four factors to be considered in the determination.
338:
The Supreme Court first noted that "he right to a speedy trial is generically different from any of the other rights enshrined in the Constitution for the protection of the accused" for three reasons:
2112:
262:
Believing that the case against Manning was the stronger of the two, and that Manning's testimony was needed to convict Barker (in his own case, Manning exercised his right under the
375:
As a balancing test, the Court adopted four factors to be considered in determining, on a case-by-case basis, whether a defendant has been prejudiced by the lack of a speedy trial:
706:
442:
414:
112:
72:
314:
104:
783:
271:
September), for each term the prosecution would seek a continuance in the Barker case, until the beginning of the following term, while the Manning cases were ongoing.
2034:
405:
Justice White, joined by Justice Brennan, concurred in the verdict, and specifically commented that an overcrowded docket would not be a reasonable basis for a delay.
505:
Counsel for the Commonwealth of Kentucky conceded at oral argument before the Supreme Court that Barker's counsel first objected in February 1962, not February 1963.
354:
The Court then noted that there were two competing approaches as to how to handle the uncertainty regarding "how long is too long"; neither of which it accepted:
2107:
2068:
774:
263:
240:
2122:
2117:
1875:
1167:
1648:
1079:
929:
35:
1834:
614:
1795:
1696:
1509:
129:
Determinations of whether the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial has been violated must be done on a case-by-case basis.
1346:
1311:
1087:
1677:
767:
1533:
1226:
468:
allow a change of venue. The fifth and sixth trials resulted in murder convictions which Manning chose not to appeal.
236:
1103:
1012:
493:
1739:
1052:
1044:
256:
1628:
1421:
1199:
1036:
948:
809:
288:
2014:
1843:
1822:
1525:
1429:
1191:
1175:
1151:
956:
825:
359:
1883:
1603:
1445:
1330:
1303:
1295:
1135:
980:
760:
735:
100:
1787:
1557:
1477:
1143:
1095:
913:
160:
2044:
1899:
1859:
1763:
1119:
988:
710:
446:
116:
64:
996:
1923:
1867:
1755:
1747:
1549:
1402:
1127:
833:
717:
2052:
1955:
1771:
1640:
1501:
1493:
1485:
1234:
972:
921:
797:
666:
188:
2076:
2022:
1947:
1915:
1803:
1656:
1517:
1381:
1266:
1258:
1028:
1020:
875:
683:
631:
322:
152:
259:
were murdered in their home by intruders, later identified as Willie Barker and Silas Manning.
1939:
1931:
1779:
1723:
1715:
1584:
1461:
1338:
1274:
1250:
1242:
1071:
306:
196:
176:
2060:
1979:
1907:
1851:
1565:
1437:
1183:
675:
623:
144:
1469:
1453:
1286:
1111:
605:
752:
304:. Though the District Court denied the petition, it granted Barker the right to proceed
1995:
1971:
1963:
1731:
1218:
1004:
726:
449:
184:
164:
2101:
1987:
1541:
1159:
964:
296:
1891:
867:
854:
244:
67:
419:
172:
108:
79:
744:
347:
has the burden to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt).
687:
635:
385:
the time and manner in which the defendant has asserted his right, and
679:
627:
388:
the degree of prejudice to the defendant which the delay has caused.
366:
it considered a speedy trial to be a fundamental right, and quoting
302:
United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
97:
1675:
1626:
1400:
1369:
894:
852:
795:
756:
30:
643:
Rudstein, David Stewart (1975). "The Right to a Speedy Trial:
287:
Barker appealed his conviction on speedy trial grounds to the
243:, specifically the right of defendants in criminal cases to a
610:: Reviving a Constitutional Remedy in an Age of Statutes"
2113:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
415:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 407
315:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
2033:
2006:
1833:
1814:
1707:
1688:
1595:
1576:
1413:
1322:
1285:
1210:
1063:
940:
905:
220:
209:
204:
133:
123:
92:
87:
59:
49:
42:
23:
310:and a certificate of probable cause to appeal.
768:
8:
537:
535:
533:
1685:
1672:
1623:
1410:
1397:
1366:
902:
891:
849:
792:
775:
761:
753:
321:The United States Supreme Court granted a
54:Willie Mae Barker v. John W. Wingo, Warden
20:
2069:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
241:Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
431:
255:On July 20, 1958, an elderly couple in
664:: Speedy Trial Gets a Fast Shuffle".
18:1972 United States Supreme Court case
7:
1168:Southern Union Co. v. United States
1649:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
1080:Almendarez-Torres v. United States
930:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
2108:United States Supreme Court cases
1596:Restrictions on cross-examination
713:514 (1972) is available from:
606:"A New Speedy Trial Standard for
590:that comported with due process."
649:University of Illinois Law Forum
615:University of Chicago Law Review
29:
1697:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
358:One approach (supported by the
2123:1972 in United States case law
1510:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
1013:Rosales-Lopez v. United States
1:
784:United States Sixth Amendment
660:Uviller, H. Richard (1972). "
291:, which affirmed it in 1964.
235:, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), was a
2118:Speedy Trial Clause case law
1678:Assistance of Counsel Clause
1227:Rassmussen v. United States
237:United States Supreme Court
2139:
1577:Face-to-face confrontation
1347:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado
1045:McDonnell v. United States
745:Oyez (oral argument audio)
329:The Supreme Court decision
257:Christian County, Kentucky
1684:
1671:
1635:
1629:Compulsory Process Clause
1622:
1422:Reynolds v. United States
1409:
1396:
1376:
1365:
1200:Erlinger v. United States
1053:United States v. Tsarnaev
1037:Skilling v. United States
949:Reynolds v. United States
901:
890:
862:
848:
810:Klopfer v. North Carolina
804:
791:
604:Brooks, Brian P. (1994).
461:It would take a total of
382:the reason for the delay,
289:Kentucky Court of Appeals
138:
128:
28:
2015:Massiah v. United States
1844:Strickland v. Washington
1823:Glasser v. United States
1796:Nichols v. United States
1526:Bullcoming v. New Mexico
1430:Dowdell v. United States
1192:United States v. Haymond
1176:Alleyne v. United States
1152:Cunningham v. California
957:Glasser v. United States
826:Doggett v. United States
360:American Bar Association
224:White, joined by Brennan
1884:Glover v. United States
1604:Chambers v. Mississippi
1446:Bruton v. United States
1414:Out-of-court statements
1331:Tanner v. United States
1323:Impeachment of verdicts
1304:Burton v. United States
1296:United States v. Dawson
1136:United States v. Booker
1104:Harris v. United States
981:Witherspoon v. Illinois
294:In 1970 Barker filed a
2007:Uncounseled statements
1835:Ineffective assistance
1788:Pennsylvania v. Finley
1558:Samia v. United States
1478:Crawford v. Washington
1312:Smith v. United States
1144:Washington v. Recuenco
1096:Apprendi v. New Jersey
1088:Jones v. United States
914:Cheff v. Schnackenberg
647:in the Lower Courts".
494:385 S.W.2d 671
489:Barker v. Commonwealth
161:William J. Brennan Jr.
2045:Faretta v. California
1900:Woodford v. Visciotti
1860:Kimmelman v. Morrison
1764:Argersinger v. Hamlin
1120:Blakely v. Washington
989:Ham v. South Carolina
896:Impartial Jury Clause
527:, 407 U.S. at 520-21.
45:Decided June 22, 1972
43:Argued April 11, 1972
1924:Wright v. Van Patten
1868:Lockhart v. Fretwell
1756:Anders v. California
1748:Gideon v. Wainwright
1550:Hemphill v. New York
1534:Williams v. Illinois
1403:Confrontation Clause
1128:Schriro v. Summerlin
834:Betterman v. Montana
496: (Ky. 1964).
379:the length of delay,
334:Opinion of the court
2053:McKaskle v. Wiggins
1956:Padilla v. Kentucky
1772:Gagnon v. Scarpelli
1740:Hamilton v. Alabama
1641:Washington v. Texas
1502:Giles v. California
1494:Whorton v. Bockting
1486:Davis v. Washington
1235:Williams v. Florida
973:Sheppard v. Maxwell
922:Duncan v. Louisiana
798:Speedy Trial Clause
736:Library of Congress
667:Columbia Law Review
239:case involving the
189:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
78:92 S. Ct. 2182; 33
2077:Indiana v. Edwards
2023:Brewer v. Williams
1948:Porter v. McCollum
1916:Holland v. Jackson
1876:Williams v. Taylor
1804:Alabama v. Shelton
1657:Taylor v. Illinois
1518:Michigan v. Bryant
1382:Rabe v. Washington
1371:Information Clause
1267:Ramos v. Louisiana
1259:Burch v. Louisiana
1211:Size and unanimity
1029:Morgan v. Illinois
1021:Wainwright v. Witt
876:Presley v. Georgia
580:, 407 U.S. at 530.
568:, 407 U.S. at 526.
556:, 407 U.S. at 523.
544:, 407 U.S. at 521.
401:Concurring opinion
368:Carnley v. Cochran
323:writ of certiorari
213:Powell, joined by
153:William O. Douglas
149:Associate Justices
2095:
2094:
2091:
2090:
2087:
2086:
1940:Wong v. Belmontes
1932:Bobby v. Van Hook
1780:Scott v. Illinois
1724:Johnson v. Zerbst
1716:Powell v. Alabama
1667:
1666:
1618:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1585:Maryland v. Craig
1462:Illinois v. Allen
1392:
1391:
1361:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1339:Warger v. Shauers
1275:Edwards v. Vannoy
1251:Ballew v. Georgia
1243:Apodaca v. Oregon
1072:Walton v. Arizona
886:
885:
844:
843:
307:in forma pauperis
228:
227:
197:William Rehnquist
177:Thurgood Marshall
2130:
2061:Rock v. Arkansas
1980:Lafler v. Cooper
1908:Wiggins v. Smith
1852:Nix v. Whiteside
1686:
1673:
1624:
1566:Smith v. Arizona
1438:Pointer v. Texas
1411:
1398:
1367:
1184:Hurst v. Florida
997:Ristaino v. Ross
903:
892:
850:
793:
777:
770:
763:
754:
749:
743:
740:
734:
731:
725:
722:
716:
691:
674:(8): 1376–1402.
656:
639:
591:
587:
581:
575:
569:
563:
557:
551:
545:
539:
528:
522:
516:
512:
506:
503:
497:
491:
485:
479:
475:
469:
459:
453:
436:
300:petition in the
267:Barker's trial.
145:Warren E. Burger
134:Court membership
119:1037 (1972).
33:
32:
21:
2138:
2137:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2083:
2029:
2002:
1829:
1810:
1703:
1680:
1663:
1631:
1610:
1591:
1572:
1470:Ohio v. Roberts
1454:Frazier v. Cupp
1405:
1388:
1372:
1353:
1318:
1287:Vicinage Clause
1281:
1206:
1112:Ring v. Arizona
1059:
936:
897:
882:
858:
840:
818:Barker v. Wingo
800:
787:
781:
747:
741:
738:
732:
729:
723:
720:
714:
703:Barker v. Wingo
698:
680:10.2307/1121490
662:Barker v. Wingo
659:
645:Barker v. Wingo
642:
628:10.2307/1600046
603:
600:
598:Further reading
595:
594:
588:
584:
576:
572:
564:
560:
552:
548:
540:
531:
523:
519:
513:
509:
504:
500:
487:
486:
482:
476:
472:
460:
456:
439:Barker v. Wingo
437:
433:
428:
411:
403:
336:
331:
285:
264:Fifth Amendment
253:
251:Facts and trial
232:Barker v. Wingo
187:
175:
163:
83:
44:
38:
24:Barker v. Wingo
19:
12:
11:
5:
2136:
2134:
2126:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2100:
2099:
2093:
2092:
2089:
2088:
2085:
2084:
2082:
2081:
2073:
2065:
2057:
2049:
2040:
2038:
2037:representation
2031:
2030:
2028:
2027:
2019:
2010:
2008:
2004:
2003:
2001:
2000:
1996:Garza v. Idaho
1992:
1984:
1976:
1972:Premo v. Moore
1968:
1964:Sears v. Upton
1960:
1952:
1944:
1936:
1928:
1920:
1912:
1904:
1896:
1888:
1880:
1872:
1864:
1856:
1848:
1839:
1837:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1827:
1818:
1816:
1812:
1811:
1809:
1808:
1800:
1792:
1784:
1776:
1768:
1760:
1752:
1744:
1736:
1732:Betts v. Brady
1728:
1720:
1711:
1709:
1705:
1704:
1702:
1701:
1692:
1690:
1682:
1681:
1676:
1669:
1668:
1665:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1653:
1645:
1636:
1633:
1632:
1627:
1620:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1611:
1609:
1608:
1599:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1590:
1589:
1580:
1578:
1574:
1573:
1571:
1570:
1562:
1554:
1546:
1538:
1530:
1522:
1514:
1506:
1498:
1490:
1482:
1474:
1466:
1458:
1450:
1442:
1434:
1426:
1417:
1415:
1407:
1406:
1401:
1394:
1393:
1390:
1389:
1387:
1386:
1377:
1374:
1373:
1370:
1363:
1362:
1359:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1352:
1351:
1343:
1335:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1317:
1316:
1308:
1300:
1291:
1289:
1283:
1282:
1280:
1279:
1271:
1263:
1255:
1247:
1239:
1231:
1223:
1219:Maxwell v. Dow
1214:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1205:
1204:
1196:
1188:
1180:
1172:
1164:
1156:
1148:
1140:
1132:
1124:
1116:
1108:
1100:
1092:
1084:
1076:
1067:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1057:
1049:
1041:
1033:
1025:
1017:
1009:
1005:Adams v. Texas
1001:
993:
985:
977:
969:
961:
953:
944:
942:
938:
937:
935:
934:
926:
918:
909:
907:
899:
898:
895:
888:
887:
884:
883:
881:
880:
872:
863:
860:
859:
853:
846:
845:
842:
841:
839:
838:
830:
822:
814:
805:
802:
801:
796:
789:
788:
782:
780:
779:
772:
765:
757:
751:
750:
718:Google Scholar
697:
696:External links
694:
693:
692:
657:
640:
622:(2): 587–611.
608:Barker v Wingo
599:
596:
593:
592:
582:
570:
558:
546:
529:
517:
507:
498:
480:
470:
454:
430:
429:
427:
424:
423:
422:
417:
410:
407:
402:
399:
390:
389:
386:
383:
380:
373:
372:
363:
352:
351:
348:
344:
335:
332:
330:
327:
284:
281:
252:
249:
226:
225:
222:
218:
217:
211:
207:
206:
202:
201:
200:
199:
185:Harry Blackmun
165:Potter Stewart
150:
147:
142:
136:
135:
131:
130:
126:
125:
121:
120:
94:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2135:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2106:
2105:
2103:
2079:
2078:
2074:
2071:
2070:
2066:
2063:
2062:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2047:
2046:
2042:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2032:
2025:
2024:
2020:
2017:
2016:
2012:
2011:
2009:
2005:
1998:
1997:
1993:
1990:
1989:
1988:Buck v. Davis
1985:
1982:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1966:
1965:
1961:
1958:
1957:
1953:
1950:
1949:
1945:
1942:
1941:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1926:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1917:
1913:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1902:
1901:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1878:
1877:
1873:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1841:
1840:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1819:
1817:
1815:Conflict-free
1813:
1806:
1805:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1774:
1773:
1769:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1710:
1706:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1693:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1674:
1670:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1646:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1625:
1621:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1594:
1587:
1586:
1582:
1581:
1579:
1575:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1544:
1543:
1542:Ohio v. Clark
1539:
1536:
1535:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1384:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1375:
1368:
1364:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1341:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1325:
1321:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1288:
1284:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1232:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1213:
1209:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1160:Oregon v. Ice
1157:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1062:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1002:
999:
998:
994:
991:
990:
986:
983:
982:
978:
975:
974:
970:
967:
966:
965:Irvin v. Dowd
962:
959:
958:
954:
951:
950:
946:
945:
943:
939:
932:
931:
927:
924:
923:
919:
916:
915:
911:
910:
908:
904:
900:
893:
889:
878:
877:
873:
870:
869:
865:
864:
861:
856:
851:
847:
836:
835:
831:
828:
827:
823:
820:
819:
815:
812:
811:
807:
806:
803:
799:
794:
790:
785:
778:
773:
771:
766:
764:
759:
758:
755:
746:
737:
728:
719:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
695:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
663:
658:
654:
650:
646:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
611:
609:
602:
601:
597:
586:
583:
579:
574:
571:
567:
562:
559:
555:
550:
547:
543:
538:
536:
534:
530:
526:
521:
518:
511:
508:
502:
499:
495:
490:
484:
481:
474:
471:
466:
465:
458:
455:
451:
448:
444:
440:
435:
432:
425:
421:
418:
416:
413:
412:
408:
406:
400:
398:
394:
387:
384:
381:
378:
377:
376:
369:
364:
361:
357:
356:
355:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
333:
328:
326:
324:
319:
316:
311:
309:
308:
303:
299:
298:
297:habeas corpus
292:
290:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
260:
258:
250:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
223:
219:
216:
212:
208:
205:Case opinions
203:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:Chief Justice
140:
139:
137:
132:
127:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
99:
95:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
2075:
2067:
2059:
2051:
2043:
2021:
2013:
1994:
1986:
1978:
1970:
1962:
1954:
1946:
1938:
1930:
1922:
1914:
1906:
1898:
1892:Bell v. Cone
1890:
1882:
1874:
1866:
1858:
1850:
1842:
1821:
1802:
1794:
1786:
1778:
1770:
1762:
1754:
1746:
1738:
1730:
1722:
1714:
1695:
1655:
1647:
1639:
1602:
1583:
1564:
1556:
1548:
1540:
1532:
1524:
1516:
1508:
1500:
1492:
1484:
1476:
1468:
1460:
1452:
1444:
1436:
1428:
1420:
1380:
1345:
1337:
1329:
1310:
1307:(1905, 1906)
1302:
1294:
1273:
1265:
1257:
1249:
1241:
1233:
1225:
1217:
1198:
1190:
1182:
1174:
1166:
1158:
1150:
1142:
1134:
1126:
1118:
1110:
1102:
1094:
1086:
1078:
1070:
1051:
1043:
1035:
1027:
1019:
1011:
1003:
995:
987:
979:
971:
963:
955:
947:
941:Impartiality
928:
920:
912:
906:Availability
874:
868:In re Oliver
866:
855:Public Trial
832:
824:
817:
816:
808:
702:
671:
665:
661:
652:
648:
644:
619:
613:
607:
585:
577:
573:
565:
561:
553:
549:
541:
524:
520:
510:
501:
488:
483:
473:
463:
462:
457:
452: (1972).
438:
434:
404:
395:
391:
374:
367:
353:
337:
320:
312:
305:
295:
293:
286:
277:
273:
269:
261:
254:
245:speedy trial
231:
230:
229:
214:
192:
180:
168:
156:
88:Case history
71:
53:
15:
1708:Appointment
1064:Facts found
655:(1): 11–58.
515:convicted."
420:Continuance
221:Concurrence
173:Byron White
111:. granted,
2102:Categories
426:References
393:illness).
325:in 1972.
215:unanimous
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
786:case law
701:Text of
409:See also
371:waiver."
210:Majority
105:6th Cir.
688:1121490
636:1600046
283:Appeals
124:Holding
107:1971);
2080:(2008)
2072:(2000)
2064:(1987)
2056:(1984)
2048:(1975)
2035:Pro se
2026:(1977)
2018:(1963)
1999:(2019)
1991:(2017)
1983:(2012)
1975:(2011)
1967:(2010)
1959:(2010)
1951:(2009)
1943:(2009)
1935:(2009)
1927:(2008)
1919:(2004)
1911:(2003)
1903:(2002)
1895:(2002)
1887:(2001)
1879:(2000)
1871:(1993)
1863:(1986)
1855:(1986)
1847:(1984)
1826:(1942)
1807:(2002)
1799:(1994)
1791:(1987)
1783:(1979)
1775:(1973)
1767:(1972)
1759:(1967)
1751:(1963)
1743:(1961)
1735:(1942)
1727:(1938)
1719:(1932)
1700:(2006)
1689:Choice
1660:(1988)
1652:(1982)
1644:(1967)
1607:(1973)
1588:(1990)
1569:(2024)
1561:(2023)
1553:(2022)
1545:(2015)
1537:(2012)
1529:(2011)
1521:(2011)
1513:(2009)
1505:(2008)
1497:(2007)
1489:(2006)
1481:(2004)
1473:(1980)
1465:(1970)
1457:(1969)
1449:(1968)
1441:(1965)
1433:(1911)
1425:(1878)
1385:(1972)
1350:(2017)
1342:(2014)
1334:(1987)
1315:(2023)
1299:(1853)
1278:(2021)
1270:(2020)
1262:(1979)
1254:(1978)
1246:(1972)
1238:(1970)
1230:(1905)
1222:(1900)
1203:(2024)
1195:(2019)
1187:(2016)
1179:(2013)
1171:(2012)
1163:(2009)
1155:(2007)
1147:(2006)
1139:(2005)
1131:(2004)
1123:(2004)
1115:(2002)
1107:(2002)
1099:(2000)
1091:(1999)
1083:(1998)
1075:(1990)
1056:(2022)
1048:(2016)
1040:(2010)
1032:(1992)
1024:(1985)
1016:(1981)
1008:(1980)
1000:(1976)
992:(1973)
984:(1968)
976:(1966)
968:(1961)
960:(1942)
952:(1878)
933:(1989)
925:(1968)
917:(1966)
879:(2010)
871:(1948)
857:Clause
837:(2016)
829:(1992)
821:(1972)
813:(1967)
748:
742:
739:
733:
730:
727:Justia
724:
721:
715:
686:
634:
578:Barker
566:Barker
554:Barker
542:Barker
525:Barker
492:,
441:,
195:
193:·
191:
183:
181:·
179:
171:
169:·
167:
159:
157:·
155:
709:
684:JSTOR
632:JSTOR
445:
115:
93:Prior
711:U.S.
653:1975
447:U.S.
313:The
117:U.S.
109:cert
101:1141
98:F.2d
96:442
73:more
65:U.S.
63:407
707:407
676:doi
624:doi
464:six
450:514
443:407
113:404
82:101
68:514
2104::
705:,
682:.
672:72
670:.
651:.
630:.
620:61
618:.
612:.
532:^
776:e
769:t
762:v
690:.
678::
638:.
626::
103:(
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.