84:, reintroduced measures of indefinite and arbitrary detentions, and trials by tribunal without jury and without right of appeal. The ordinance was enacted into law in 1925 and remained in force for 5 years. Almost One hundred and fifty people were detained under the law, including among the notable detainees
74:, leading to the mistaken killing of another European. In response, following a number of requests from the Governor of Bengal, the ordinance was enacted extending the extraordinary powers of the
66:
and re-engaged in nationalist independence movements against the Raj. A string of violence through 1923 saw murders of police witnesses and informers, culminating in the attempt to assassinate
147:
75:
167:
127:
101:
89:
152:
124:
Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of
Legality. By Victor V. Ramraj, Arun K. Thiruvengadam. p199-200
157:
162:
85:
63:
59:
43:
132:
49:
88:, later Congress leader. The act was re-enacted in 1930, and later formed a basis for the
67:
141:
80:
71:
29:
106:
32:. The law was implemented to stem the rise in revolutionary nationalism by the
55:
118:
History of the
Freedom Movement in India (1857-1947). By S. N. Sen.p 245.
34:
39:
25:
121:
The
History of British India: A Chronology. By John F. Riddick. p106
24:
in 1925, was a criminal law ordinance enacted in
October 1924 in
133:
South Asia
Archive records of Bengal Criminal Law Ordinance
128:
Hansard record of House of Lords debate on Bengal
Ordinance
42:
in Bengal after 1922. Following the collapse of the
47:
8:
18:Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance
7:
14:
54:reformed under the leadership of
22:Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act
48:
1:
20:of 1924, enacted into law as
148:Legislation in British India
90:Burma Criminal Law Amendment
184:
102:Defence of India act, 1915
78:. It removed rights of
76:Regulation III of 1818
46:, the remnants of the
168:1925 in British law
86:Subhas Chandra Bose
64:Bhupendranath Dutta
60:Hem Chandra Kanungo
44:Nonviolent movement
175:
153:Anushilan Samiti
53:
52:
50:Anushilan Samiti
183:
182:
178:
177:
176:
174:
173:
172:
138:
137:
115:
98:
38:group against
12:
11:
5:
181:
179:
171:
170:
165:
160:
155:
150:
140:
139:
136:
135:
130:
125:
122:
119:
114:
111:
110:
109:
104:
97:
94:
68:Charles Tegart
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
180:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
158:1925 in India
156:
154:
151:
149:
146:
145:
143:
134:
131:
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
99:
95:
93:
91:
87:
83:
82:
81:Habeas corpus
77:
73:
72:Gopinath Saha
69:
65:
61:
57:
51:
45:
41:
37:
36:
31:
30:British India
27:
23:
19:
79:
33:
21:
17:
15:
163:1925 in law
107:Rowlatt Act
142:Categories
113:References
92:in 1931.
56:Surya Sen
96:See also
35:Jugantar
40:The Raj
26:Bengal
28:, in
62:and
16:The
70:by
144::
58:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.