Knowledge (XXG)

Birkhoff's representation theorem

Source 📝

553: 148: 564:
form a lattice in which the lattice's partial ordering is given by set inclusion, the join operation corresponds to set union, and the meet operation corresponds to set intersection, because unions and intersections preserve the property of being a lower set. Because set unions and intersections obey
1223:
In an infinite distributive lattice, it may not be the case that the lower sets of the join-irreducible elements are in one-to-one correspondence with lattice elements. Indeed, there may be no join-irreducibles at all. This happens, for instance, in the lattice of all natural numbers, ordered with
282:
Birkhoff's theorem states that this relation between the operations ∧ and ∨ of the lattice of divisors and the operations ∩ and ∪ of the associated sets of prime powers is not coincidental, and not dependent on the specific properties of prime numbers and divisibility: the elements of any finite
1306:
showed that Stone's representation theorem could be interpreted as an extension of the idea of representing lattice elements by lower sets of a partial order, using Nachbin's idea of ordered topological spaces. Stone spaces with an additional partial order linked with the topology via
246:
that divide it: thus, 12 is associated with the set {2,3,4}, while 20 is associated with the set {2,4,5}. Then 12 ∧ 20 = 4 is associated with the set {2,3,4} ∩ {2,4,5} = {2,4}, while 12 ∨ 20 = 60 is associated with the set
250:
The prime powers 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 appearing as elements in these sets may themselves be partially ordered by divisibility; in this smaller partial order, 2 ≤ 4 ≤ 8 and there are no order relations between other pairs. The 16 sets that are associated with divisors of 120 are the
330:
is join-irreducible if it is neither the bottom element of the lattice (the join of zero elements) nor the join of any two smaller elements. For instance, in the lattice of divisors of 120, there is no pair of elements whose join is 4, so 4 is join-irreducible. An element
69:. The union and intersection operations, in a family of sets that is closed under these operations, automatically form a distributive lattice, and Birkhoff's representation theorem states that every finite distributive lattice can be formed in this way. It is named after 127:
Many lattices can be defined in such a way that the elements of the lattice are represented by sets, the join operation of the lattice is represented by set union, and the meet operation of the lattice is represented by set intersection. For instance, the
1490: 809:
Birkhoff's theorem, as stated above, is a correspondence between individual partial orders and distributive lattices. However, it can also be extended to a correspondence between order-preserving functions of partial orders and
1327:
topologies on a set to represent an abstract distributive lattice. Thus, Birkhoff's representation theorem extends to the case of infinite (bounded) distributive lattices in at least three different ways, summed up in
1627:
A minor difference between the 2-SAT and initial stable set formulations is that the latter presupposes the choice of a fixed base point from the median graph that corresponds to the empty initial stable
1531:, one on the positive variables of the instance and the other on the negative variables; the transitive closure of the positive component is the underlying partial order of the distributive lattice. 1210:
between, on the one hand, the category of finite partial orders and order-preserving maps, and on the other hand the category of finite distributive lattices and bounded lattice homomorphisms.
437:
There exist lattices in which the join-prime elements form a proper subset of the join-irreducible elements, but in a distributive lattice the two types of elements coincide. For, suppose that
1346: 167:
12 ∨ 20 = 60; both of these numbers are also divisors of 120. These two operations ∨ and ∧ satisfy the distributive law, in either of two equivalent forms: (
1109:(the meet of all elements mapped to 1), which must be join-irreducible (it cannot be the join of any set of elements mapped to 0), so every lattice homomorphism has the form 1340:
Birkhoff's representation theorem may also be generalized to finite structures other than distributive lattices. In a distributive lattice, the self-dual median operation
556:
Distributive example lattice, with join-irreducible elements a,...,g (shadowed nodes). The lower set a node corresponds to by Birkhoff's isomorphism is shown in blue.
1832: 1547:, a family of sets closed under unions but in which closure under intersections has been replaced by the property that each nonempty set has a removable element. 144:
finite distributive lattices can be obtained this way, and later generalizations of Birkhoff's theorem state a similar thing for infinite distributive lattices.
1702: 279:. Thus, the partial order on the five prime powers 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 carries enough information to recover the entire original 16-element divisibility lattice. 1806: 386:
In any lattice, a join-prime element must be join-irreducible. Equivalently, an element that is not join-irreducible is not join-prime. For, if an element
565:
the distributive law, this is a distributive lattice. Birkhoff's theorem states that any finite distributive lattice can be constructed in this way.
159:
of some composite number, such as (in the figure) 120, partially ordered by divisibility. Any two divisors of 120, such as 12 and 20, have a unique
1329: 247:{2,3,4} ∪ {2,4,5} = {2,3,4,5}, so the join and meet operations of the lattice correspond to union and intersection of sets. 1519:. For a distributive lattice, the corresponding mixed graph has no undirected edges, and the initial stable sets are just the lower sets of the 26: 1791: 100: 1885: 801:. The ring of sets itself is then the family of lower sets of this preorder, and any preorder gives rise to a ring of sets in this way. 1528: 1746: 781:. If the sets in a ring of sets are ordered by inclusion, they form a distributive lattice. The elements of the sets may be given a 1265: 1779: 1539:
Another result analogous to Birkhoff's representation theorem, but applying to a broader class of lattices, is the theorem of
1644: 1512: 294:-element set, partially ordered by inclusion. Birkhoff's theorem shows this lattice to be produced by the lower sets of the 99:
The name “Birkhoff's representation theorem” has also been applied to two other results of Birkhoff, one from 1935 on the
65:, the "meet" and "join" operations, which must obey certain axioms; it is distributive if these two operations obey the 1556: 821:
denote the partial order on the two-element set {0, 1}, with the order relation 0 < 1, and (following Stanley) let
115:
representing algebras as products of irreducible algebras. Birkhoff's representation theorem has also been called the
1672: 1287: 1207: 295: 112: 58: 544:; Birkhoff's theorem states that the lattice itself can be recovered from the lower sets of this partial order. 884: 133: 93: 1485:{\displaystyle m(x,y,z)=(x\vee y)\wedge (x\vee z)\wedge (y\vee z)=(x\wedge y)\vee (x\wedge z)\vee (y\wedge z)} 814:
of the corresponding distributive lattices. The direction of these maps is reversed in this correspondence.
767: 160: 763: 164: 275:, one can recover the associated divisor by computing the least common multiple of the prime powers in 1734: 1320: 811: 236: 46: 576:
is isomorphic to the lattice of lower sets of the partial order of the join-irreducible elements of
140:, any lattice defined in this way is a distributive lattice. Birkhoff's theorem states that in fact 1758: 1316: 552: 1863: 1520: 54: 136:
has a lattice of sets as its family of open sets. Because set unions and intersections obey the
1787: 1742: 1524: 1503:. Finite median algebras and median graphs have a dual structure as the set of solutions of a 1298:), topological spaces in which the compact open sets are closed under intersection and form a 1280: 766:
under the operations of set unions and set intersections; later, motivated by applications in
132:
defined from the family of all subsets of a finite set has this property. More generally any
1870:, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 49, Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–112 1849: 1841: 1827: 1815: 1801: 1767: 1711: 1693: 1681: 1667: 1653: 1504: 1303: 163:
12 ∧ 20 = 4, the largest number that divides both of them, and a unique
151:
The distributive lattice of divisors of 120, and its representation as sets of prime powers.
137: 70: 66: 62: 1725: 1264:. However, elements in infinite distributive lattices may still be represented as sets via 283:
distributive lattice may be associated with lower sets of a partial order in the same way.
1721: 1312: 1308: 1299: 1284: 1188: 777: 303: 129: 85: 1496: 1295: 1291: 759: 22: 1830:(1972), "Ordered topological spaces and the representation of distributive lattices", 1311:
can also be used to represent bounded distributive lattices. Such spaces are known as
1879: 1756:
Edelman, Paul H. (1980), "Meet-distributive lattices and the anti-exchange closure",
1658: 1273: 1269: 541: 81: 1804:(1970), "Representation of distributive lattices by means of ordered Stone spaces", 1716: 1642:
Barthélemy, J.-P.; Constantin, J. (1993), "Median graphs, parallelism and posets",
1500: 1261: 584:
That is, there is a one-to-one order-preserving correspondence between elements of
1697: 1685: 731:
is the join of two or more join-irreducible items then they must again belong to
1544: 1516: 1196: 243: 103:
as families of sets closed under union, intersection, and complement (so-called
35: 1845: 588:
and lower sets of the partial order. The lower set corresponding to an element
1854: 50: 43: 561: 252: 77: 1819: 1093:
to 1 and all other lower sets to 0. And, for any lattice homomorphism from
1066:
themselves correspond one-for-one with bounded lattice homomorphisms from
841:. For, if ƒ is such a function, ƒ(0) forms a lower set, and conversely if 1276: 782: 743:. Therefore, the correspondence is one-to-one and the theorem is proved. 635:
be the lower set of the join-irreducible elements less than or equal to
89: 1132:
one may use composition of functions to define an order-preserving map
825:
denote the distributive lattice of lower sets of a finite partial order
659:
must (by join-primality) be less than or equal to one of the members of
540:
The lattice ordering on the subset of join-irreducible elements forms a
493:
is join-irreducible, at least one of the two terms in this join must be
147: 1771: 156: 287: 1543:
that any finite join-distributive lattice may be represented as an
551: 146: 326:
is not the join of a finite set of other elements. Equivalently,
1283:. This generalized representation theorem can be expressed as a 255:
of this smaller partial order, subsets of elements such that if
1511:
formulate this structure equivalently as the family of initial
833:
correspond one-for-one to the order-preserving functions from
1527:
of the 2-satisfiability instance can be partitioned into two
991:
if and only if belongs both to the set of elements mapped to
1523:
of the graph. Equivalently, for a distributive lattice, the
845:
is a lower set one may define an order-preserving function ƒ
302:
generators, the number of elements of which is given by the
1294:(sometimes called coherent spaces, but not the same as the 61:
of sets. Here, a lattice is an abstract structure with two
111:
used by Birkhoff to represent distributive lattices), and
53:, in such a way that the lattice operations correspond to 42:
for distributive lattices states that the elements of any
655:, and any join-irreducible element less than or equal to 1105:
that are mapped to 1 must have a unique minimal element
683:
be the join-irreducible elements less than or equal to
453:. This inequality is equivalent to the statement that 1559:, also representing every finite distributive lattice 1349: 367:. In the same lattice, 4 is join-prime: whenever lcm( 339:
if it differs from the bottom element, and whenever
16:
Equivalence of distributive lattices and set families
1508: 1323:, generalize Stone's original approach by utilizing 117:
fundamental theorem for finite distributive lattices
1499:, and the covering relation of the lattice forms a 1224:the reverse of the usual divisibility ordering (so 703:. For, as a join of elements less than or equal to 271:must also belong to the subset. From any lower set 1484: 596:is simply the set of join-irreducible elements of 1082:, one may define a bounded lattice homomorphism 1272:in which each lattice element corresponds to a 1120:. Again, from any bounded lattice homomorphism 771: 242:One may associate each divisor with the set of 1833:Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 1786:, Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–69, 1698:"A ternary operation in distributive lattices" 1535:Finite join-distributive lattices and matroids 76:The theorem can be interpreted as providing a 1703:Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 855:to 0 and that maps the remaining elements of 663:, and therefore must (by the assumption that 390:is not join-irreducible, there exist smaller 8: 1615: 612:of join-irreducible elements is the join of 286:As another example, consider the lattice of 1807:Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 1853: 1715: 1657: 1603: 1587: 1585: 1348: 1059:* is a homomorphism of bounded lattices. 25:. For other similarly named results, see 1576: 1330:duality theory for distributive lattices 1244:can be expressed as the join of numbers 1031:(the function that maps all elements of 913:and therefore corresponds to an element 751: 235:. Therefore, the divisors form a finite 1591: 1569: 1540: 1027:). Additionally, the bottom element of 793:whenever some set in the ring contains 73:, who published a proof of it in 1937. 863:is any order-preserving function from 310:The partial order of join-irreducibles 1268:for distributive lattices, a form of 1172:for any bounded lattice homomorphism 434:, showing that it is not join-prime. 375:) is divisible by 4, at least one of 7: 1089:that maps all lower sets containing 671:itself. Conversely, for any element 426:is not less than or equal to either 1868:Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume I 27:Birkhoff's theorem (disambiguation) 1509:Barthélemy & Constantin (1993) 1336:Median algebras and related graphs 1290:between distributive lattices and 995:and the set of elements mapped to 623:of join-irreducible elements, let 572:. Any finite distributive lattice 101:representation of Boolean algebras 80:between distributive lattices and 14: 1782:(1982), "II.3 Coherent locales", 40:Birkhoff's representation theorem 1717:10.1090/S0002-9904-1947-08864-9 1296:coherent spaces in linear logic 905:. This composite function maps 600:that are less than or equal to 469:), and by the distributive law 383:must itself be divisible by 4. 1479: 1467: 1461: 1449: 1443: 1431: 1425: 1413: 1407: 1395: 1389: 1377: 1371: 1353: 1266:Stone's representation theorem 1219:Infinite distributive lattices 441:is join-irreducible, and that 86:quasi-ordinal knowledge spaces 1: 1686:10.1215/S0012-7094-37-00334-X 1152:for any order-preserving map 772:Doignon & Falmagne (1999) 608:corresponding to a lower set 1659:10.1016/0012-365X(93)90140-O 871:, one may define a function 774:called the same structure a 497:itself, showing that either 267:belongs to the subset, then 1557:Lattice of stable matchings 1039:* to the bottom element of 747:Rings of sets and preorders 1902: 1886:Theorems in lattice theory 1616:Birkhoff & Kiss (1947) 1309:Priestley separation axiom 1144:. It may be verified that 667:is a lower set) belong to 560:In any partial order, the 1673:Duke Mathematical Journal 1670:(1937), "Rings of sets", 1197:contravariant hom-functor 1062:However, the elements of 1043:, and the top element of 719:is join-irreducible then 314:In a lattice, an element 296:free distributive lattice 107:, closely related to the 94:finite topological spaces 78:one-to-one correspondence 1846:10.1112/plms/s3-24.3.507 1051:* to the top element of 885:composition of functions 647:. For, every element of 134:finite topological space 829:. Then the elements of 768:mathematical psychology 711:can be no greater than 547: 123:Background and examples 1696:; Kiss, S. A. (1947), 1486: 557: 161:greatest common factor 152: 113:Birkhoff's HSP theorem 49:can be represented as 1487: 1321:pairwise Stone spaces 1208:duality of categories 812:bounded homomorphisms 604:, and the element of 555: 165:least common multiple 150: 1820:10.1112/blms/2.2.186 1645:Discrete Mathematics 1529:connected components 1347: 1317:bitopological spaces 999:) and symmetrically 237:distributive lattice 47:distributive lattice 1759:Algebra Universalis 1741:, Springer-Verlag, 1315:. Further, certain 1202: = Hom(—, 1035:to 0) is mapped by 935:. Further, for any 887:to map any element 651:clearly belongs to 1855:10338.dmlcz/134149 1772:10.1007/BF02482912 1521:transitive closure 1482: 1302:for the topology. 1285:category-theoretic 1189:category theoretic 1101:, the elements of 1078:is any element of 619:For any lower set 558: 548:Birkhoff's theorem 153: 1793:978-0-521-33779-3 1694:Birkhoff, Garrett 1668:Birkhoff, Garrett 1525:implication graph 1281:topological space 1206:) that defines a 983:to the lower set 975:) (an element of 63:binary operations 1893: 1871: 1858: 1857: 1828:Priestley, H. A. 1822: 1802:Priestley, H. A. 1796: 1780:Johnstone, Peter 1774: 1751: 1739:Knowledge Spaces 1735:Falmagne, J.-Cl. 1733:Doignon, J.-P.; 1728: 1719: 1688: 1662: 1661: 1629: 1625: 1619: 1613: 1607: 1604:Johnstone (1982) 1601: 1595: 1589: 1580: 1574: 1505:2-satisfiability 1495:gives rise to a 1491: 1489: 1488: 1483: 1313:Priestley spaces 1304:Hilary Priestley 921:) = (ƒ 320:join-irreducible 304:Dedekind numbers 138:distributive law 71:Garrett Birkhoff 67:distributive law 1901: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1876: 1875: 1862: 1826: 1800: 1794: 1778: 1755: 1749: 1732: 1692: 1666: 1641: 1638: 1633: 1632: 1626: 1622: 1614: 1610: 1602: 1598: 1590: 1583: 1577:Birkhoff (1937) 1575: 1571: 1566: 1553: 1537: 1345: 1344: 1338: 1292:spectral spaces 1221: 1216: 1214:Generalizations 1168:** =  1148:** =  1114: 1087: 926: 900: 850: 807: 778:knowledge space 752:Birkhoff (1937) 749: 715:itself, but if 691:be the join of 627:be the join of 550: 481:) ∨ ( 312: 215:) ∨ ( 187:) ∧ ( 130:Boolean lattice 125: 96:and preorders. 17: 12: 11: 5: 1899: 1897: 1889: 1888: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1864:Stanley, R. P. 1860: 1840:(3): 507–530, 1824: 1814:(2): 186–190, 1798: 1792: 1776: 1766:(1): 290–299, 1753: 1747: 1730: 1710:(1): 749–752, 1690: 1680:(3): 443–454, 1664: 1652:(1–3): 49–63, 1637: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1620: 1608: 1596: 1592:Stanley (1997) 1581: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1552: 1549: 1541:Edelman (1980) 1536: 1533: 1497:median algebra 1493: 1492: 1481: 1478: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1337: 1334: 1240:): any number 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1112: 1085: 1019:) ∨  1011:) =  967:) ∧  959:) =  922: 896: 883:that uses the 846: 806: 803: 776:quasi-ordinal 760:family of sets 748: 745: 582: 581: 549: 546: 529:(equivalently 509:(equivalently 473: = ( 461: ∧ ( 311: 308: 207: = ( 203:) ∧  179: = ( 175:) ∨  124: 121: 105:fields of sets 82:partial orders 32: 31: 23:lattice theory 21:This is about 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1898: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1881: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1856: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1754: 1750: 1748:3-540-64501-2 1744: 1740: 1736: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1718: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1600: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1570: 1563: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1534: 1532: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1464: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1446: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1428: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1392: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1374: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1350: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1335: 1333: 1331: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1282: 1279:in a certain 1278: 1275: 1271: 1270:Stone duality 1267: 1263: 1262:prime numbers 1260:are distinct 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1228: ≤  1227: 1218: 1213: 1211: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1194: 1191:terminology, 1190: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1164:and that and 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1047:is mapped by 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1007: ∨  1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 987: ∩  986: 982: 979:is mapped by 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 955: ∧  954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 927: ∘  925: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 901: ∘  899: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 854: 849: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 815: 813: 805:Functoriality 804: 802: 800: 796: 792: 789: ≤  788: 784: 780: 779: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 746: 744: 742: 739: ≥  738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 699: =  698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 643: =  642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 617: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 579: 575: 571: 568: 567: 566: 563: 554: 545: 543: 542:partial order 538: 536: 533: ≤  532: 528: 525: ∧  524: 521: =  520: 516: 513: ≤  512: 508: 505: ∧  504: 501: =  500: 496: 492: 489:). But since 488: 485: ∧  484: 480: 477: ∧  476: 472: 468: 465: ∨  464: 460: 457: =  456: 452: 449: ∨  448: 445: ≤  444: 440: 435: 433: 429: 425: 421: 418: ∨  417: 414: ≤  413: 409: 406: ∨  405: 402: =  401: 397: 393: 389: 384: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 363: ≤  362: 358: 355: ≤  354: 350: 347: ∨  346: 343: ≤  342: 338: 334: 329: 325: 321: 317: 309: 307: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 284: 280: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 248: 245: 240: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 219: ∧  218: 214: 211: ∧  210: 206: 202: 199: ∨  198: 194: 191: ∨  190: 186: 183: ∨  182: 178: 174: 171: ∧  170: 166: 162: 158: 155:Consider the 149: 145: 143: 139: 135: 131: 122: 120: 118: 114: 110: 109:rings of sets 106: 102: 97: 95: 92:, or between 91: 87: 83: 79: 74: 72: 68: 64: 60: 59:intersections 56: 52: 48: 45: 41: 37: 30: 28: 24: 19: 18: 1867: 1837: 1831: 1811: 1805: 1784:Stone Spaces 1783: 1763: 1757: 1738: 1707: 1701: 1677: 1671: 1649: 1643: 1623: 1611: 1599: 1572: 1538: 1501:median graph 1494: 1339: 1324: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1203: 1199: 1192: 1186: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1061: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 923: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 897: 892: 888: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 847: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 816: 808: 798: 794: 790: 786: 775: 756:ring of sets 755: 750: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 618: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 583: 577: 573: 569: 559: 539: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 436: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 385: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 327: 323: 319: 315: 313: 299: 291: 285: 281: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 249: 244:prime powers 241: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 154: 141: 126: 116: 108: 104: 98: 75: 39: 33: 20: 1545:antimatroid 1517:mixed graph 1513:stable sets 1055:. That is, 723:belongs to 410:. But then 223:), for all 51:finite sets 36:mathematics 1636:References 1507:instance; 1074:. For, if 851:that maps 754:defined a 687:, and let 631:, and let 562:lower sets 398:such that 337:join-prime 253:lower sets 84:, between 1474:∧ 1465:∨ 1456:∧ 1447:∨ 1438:∧ 1420:∨ 1411:∧ 1402:∨ 1393:∧ 1384:∨ 1319:, namely 1116:for some 859:to 1. If 785:in which 727:while if 351:, either 90:preorders 1880:Category 1866:(1997), 1737:(1999), 1551:See also 1277:open set 1236:divides 931:)(0) of 797:but not 783:preorder 762:that is 758:to be a 157:divisors 1726:0021540 1288:duality 1274:compact 1136:* from 875:* from 695:. Then 639:. Then 570:Theorem 288:subsets 195:) and ( 1790:  1745:  1724:  1252:where 764:closed 679:, let 422:, and 290:of an 231:, and 55:unions 44:finite 1564:Notes 1515:in a 1232:when 1195:is a 1176:from 1156:from 1124:from 895:to ƒ 735:, so 517:) or 1788:ISBN 1743:ISBN 1628:set. 1300:base 1256:and 1248:and 1182:J(Q) 1178:J(P) 1130:J(Q) 1126:J(P) 1103:J(P) 1095:J(P) 1068:J(P) 1053:J(Q) 1045:J(P) 1041:J(Q) 1029:J(P) 945:J(P) 939:and 933:J(Q) 893:J(P) 881:J(Q) 877:J(P) 831:J(P) 823:J(P) 817:Let 394:and 379:and 263:and 88:and 57:and 1850:hdl 1842:doi 1816:doi 1768:doi 1712:doi 1682:doi 1654:doi 1650:111 1325:two 1187:In 1180:to 1160:to 1140:to 1128:to 1097:to 1070:to 943:in 909:to 891:of 879:to 867:to 837:to 675:of 592:of 537:). 430:or 359:or 335:is 322:if 318:is 298:on 142:all 34:In 1882:: 1848:, 1838:24 1836:, 1810:, 1764:10 1762:, 1722:MR 1720:, 1708:53 1706:, 1700:, 1676:, 1648:, 1584:^ 1332:. 1250:xq 1246:xp 1184:. 1023:*( 1015:*( 1003:*( 971:*( 963:*( 951:*( 947:, 917:*( 770:, 707:, 616:. 306:. 259:≤ 239:. 227:, 119:. 38:, 1872:. 1859:. 1852:: 1844:: 1823:. 1818:: 1812:2 1797:. 1775:. 1770:: 1752:. 1729:. 1714:: 1689:. 1684:: 1678:3 1663:. 1656:: 1618:. 1606:. 1594:. 1579:. 1480:) 1477:z 1471:y 1468:( 1462:) 1459:z 1453:x 1450:( 1444:) 1441:y 1435:x 1432:( 1429:= 1426:) 1423:z 1417:y 1414:( 1408:) 1405:z 1399:x 1396:( 1390:) 1387:y 1381:x 1378:( 1375:= 1372:) 1369:z 1366:, 1363:y 1360:, 1357:x 1354:( 1351:m 1258:q 1254:p 1242:x 1238:x 1234:y 1230:y 1226:x 1204:2 1200:J 1193:J 1174:h 1170:h 1166:h 1162:P 1158:Q 1154:g 1150:g 1146:g 1142:P 1138:Q 1134:h 1122:h 1118:x 1113:x 1111:j 1107:x 1099:2 1091:x 1086:x 1084:j 1080:P 1076:x 1072:2 1064:P 1057:g 1049:g 1037:g 1033:P 1025:y 1021:g 1017:x 1013:g 1009:y 1005:x 1001:g 997:y 993:x 989:y 985:x 981:g 977:Q 973:y 969:g 965:x 961:g 957:y 953:x 949:g 941:y 937:x 929:g 924:L 919:L 915:g 911:2 907:Q 903:g 898:L 889:L 873:g 869:P 865:Q 861:g 857:P 853:L 848:L 843:L 839:2 835:P 827:P 819:2 799:y 795:x 791:y 787:x 741:x 737:y 733:S 729:x 725:S 721:x 717:x 713:x 709:y 705:x 701:y 697:x 693:S 689:y 685:x 681:S 677:L 673:x 669:S 665:S 661:S 657:x 653:T 649:S 645:T 641:S 637:x 633:T 629:S 625:x 621:S 614:S 610:S 606:L 602:x 598:L 594:L 590:x 586:L 580:. 578:L 574:L 535:z 531:x 527:z 523:x 519:x 515:y 511:x 507:y 503:x 499:x 495:x 491:x 487:z 483:x 479:y 475:x 471:x 467:z 463:y 459:x 455:x 451:z 447:y 443:x 439:x 432:z 428:y 424:x 420:z 416:y 412:x 408:z 404:y 400:x 396:z 392:y 388:x 381:z 377:y 373:z 371:, 369:y 365:z 361:x 357:y 353:x 349:z 345:y 341:x 333:x 328:x 324:x 316:x 300:n 292:n 277:L 273:L 269:x 265:y 261:y 257:x 233:z 229:y 225:x 221:z 217:y 213:z 209:x 205:z 201:y 197:x 193:z 189:y 185:z 181:x 177:z 173:y 169:x 29:.

Index

lattice theory
Birkhoff's theorem (disambiguation)
mathematics
finite
distributive lattice
finite sets
unions
intersections
binary operations
distributive law
Garrett Birkhoff
one-to-one correspondence
partial orders
quasi-ordinal knowledge spaces
preorders
finite topological spaces
representation of Boolean algebras
Birkhoff's HSP theorem
Boolean lattice
finite topological space
distributive law

divisors
greatest common factor
least common multiple
distributive lattice
prime powers
lower sets
subsets
free distributive lattice

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.