105:
to the said street, and cause another key to be hung up in the watch-house in or near to the said street. By sect. 87, pipes were to be eighteen inches beneath the surface of the soil. By the 89th section, the mains were at all times to be kept charged with water. The defendants derived no profit from the maintenance of the plugs distinct from the general profits of the whole business, but such maintenance was one of the conditions under which they were permitted to exercise the privileges given by the Act. The main-pipe opposite the house of the plaintiff was more than eighteen inches below the surface. The fire-plug was constructed according to the best known system, and the materials of it were at the time of the accident sound and in good order.
104:
the company should, upon the laying down of any main-pipe or other pipe in any street, fix, at the time of laying down such pipe, a proper and sufficient fire-plug in each such street, and should deliver the key or keys of such fire-plug to the persons having the care of the engine-house in or near
126:
Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. The defendants might have been liable for negligence, if,
109:
The defendant had installed a fireplug into the hydrant near Mr Blyth's house. That winter, during a severe frost, the plug failed causing a flood and damage to Mr Blyth's house. Blyth sued the
Waterworks for negligence.
135:
would do in the circumstances. Birmingham had not seen such cold in such a long time, and it would be unreasonable for the Water Works to anticipate such a rare occurrence.
131:
The court found that the severe frost could not have been in the contemplation of the Water Works. They could only have been negligent if they had failed to do what a
127:
unintentionally, they omitted to do that which a reasonable person would have done, or did that which a person taking reasonable precautions would not have done.
176:
258:
186:
253:
243:
138:
B. Martin offered a concurring opinion, stating that "hold otherwise would be to make the company responsible as insurers."
248:
238:
100:. They had been incorporated by statute for the purpose of supplying Birmingham with water. The statute provided that:
89:
233:
119:
93:
80:. It is famous for its classic statement of what negligence is and the standard of care to be met.
182:
132:
218:
202:
161:
53:
145:
delivered a dissenting judgment on the law, but reached the same result on the facts.
227:
142:
97:
77:
203:"BLYTH v. THE COMPANY OF PROPRIETORS OF THE BIRMINGHAM WATERWORKS"
162:"BLYTH v. THE COMPANY OF PROPRIETORS OF THE BIRMINGHAM WATERWORKS"
122:, made what has become a famous definition of negligence:
76:(1856) 11 Ex Ch 781 concerns reasonableness in the law of
59:
49:
41:
33:
25:
20:
124:
65:Negligence, nuisance, reasonable foreseeability
8:
178:Examples and Explanations for the Tort Laws
17:
153:
118:In establishing the basis of the case,
175:Glannon, Joseph W. (30 January 2015).
73:Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company
21:Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company
7:
14:
219:Full text of decision from Bailii
259:Court of Exchequer Chamber cases
45:(1856) 11 Ex Ch 781, 156 ER 1047
1:
90:Birmingham Waterworks Company
275:
64:
254:English nuisance cases
129:
107:
244:English tort case law
102:
54:Full text of judgment
249:Baron Bramwell cases
239:1856 in British law
133:reasonable person
69:
68:
266:
234:1856 in case law
207:
206:
199:
193:
192:
172:
166:
165:
158:
18:
274:
273:
269:
268:
267:
265:
264:
263:
224:
223:
215:
210:
201:
200:
196:
189:
174:
173:
169:
160:
159:
155:
151:
116:
101:
86:
37:6 February 1856
29:Exchequer Court
12:
11:
5:
272:
270:
262:
261:
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
226:
225:
222:
221:
214:
213:External links
211:
209:
208:
194:
187:
167:
152:
150:
147:
120:Baron Alderson
115:
112:
87:
85:
82:
67:
66:
62:
61:
57:
56:
51:
47:
46:
43:
39:
38:
35:
31:
30:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
271:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
231:
229:
220:
217:
216:
212:
204:
198:
195:
190:
188:9781454860631
184:
180:
179:
171:
168:
163:
157:
154:
148:
146:
144:
139:
136:
134:
128:
123:
121:
113:
111:
106:
99:
95:
91:
83:
81:
79:
75:
74:
63:
58:
55:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
16:
197:
177:
170:
156:
140:
137:
130:
125:
117:
108:
103:
88:defendants,
72:
71:
70:
15:
94:water works
92:, were the
228:Categories
149:References
98:Birmingham
78:negligence
50:Transcript
143:Bramwell
114:Judgment
60:Keywords
42:Citation
34:Decided
185:
84:Facts
26:Court
183:ISBN
96:for
141:B.
230::
181:.
205:.
191:.
164:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.