Knowledge (XXG)

Bootstrap model

Source 📝

66: 317:, the principle that the forces between particles are determined by particle exchange. Once the spectrum of particles is known, the force law is known, and this means that the spectrum is constrained to bound states which form through the action of these forces. The simplest way to solve the consistency condition is to postulate a few elementary particles of spin less than or equal to one, and construct the scattering 361:
alone. This is nowadays known not to be true, since there are many theories which are nonperturbatively consistent, each with their own S-matrix. Without the narrow-resonance approximation, the bootstrap program did not have a clear expansion parameter, and the consistency equations were often complicated and unwieldy, so that the method had limited success. It fell out of favor with the rise of
136: 25: 349:
particles in the first approximation, so that scattering and decays could be thought of as a perturbation. This allowed a bootstrap model with infinitely many particle types to be constructed like a field theory — the lowest order scattering amplitude should show Regge behavior and unitarity would determine the loop corrections order by order. This is how
348:
would determine the self-consistent quantum corrections in a way analogous to including loops. The only fully successful implementation of the program required another assumption to organize the mathematics of unitarity (the narrow resonance approximation). This meant that all the hadrons were stable
360:
Many in the bootstrap community believed that field theory, which was plagued by problems of definition, was fundamentally inconsistent at high energies. Some believed that there is only one consistent theory which requires infinitely many particle species and whose form can be found by consistency
394:
was said to enable new discoveries in the field of quantum theories. Decades after bootstrap seemed to be forgotten, physicists have discovered novel "bootstrap techniques" that appear to solve many problems. The bootstrap approach is said to be "a powerful tool for understanding more symmetric ,
302:" in which the idea that some particles were more elementary than others was discarded. Instead, they sought to derive as much information as possible about the strong interaction from plausible assumptions about the 340:
to formulate a consistent S-matrix for infinitely many particle types. The Regge hypothesis would determine the spectrum, crossing and analyticity would determine the
95: 381:
here refers to 'pulling oneself up by one's bootstraps,' as particles were surmised to be held together by forces consisting of exchanges of the particles themselves.
318: 395:
perfect theories that, according to experts, serve as 'signposts' or 'building blocks' in the space of all possible quantum field theories".
434: 237: 219: 117: 52: 325:, but this method does not allow for composite particles of spin greater than 1 and without the then undiscovered phenomenon of 153: 38: 200: 157: 172: 510: 484: 468:
D. Kaiser (2002). "Nuclear democracy: Political engagement, pedagogical reform, and particle physics in postwar America."
179: 78: 357:, which remains the only theory constructed from general consistency conditions and mild assumptions on the spectrum. 88: 82: 74: 146: 186: 99: 168: 362: 341: 322: 44: 505: 414: 345: 295: 409: 350: 314: 291: 275: 326: 307: 259: 193: 306:, which describes what happens when particles of any sort collide, an approach advocated by 386: 263: 499: 377: 354: 287: 404: 337: 336:
Chew and followers believed that it would be possible to use crossing symmetry and
286:— made it clear to physicists that none of these particles is elementary. 255: 135: 365:, which described mesons and baryons in terms of elementary particles called 303: 370: 366: 330: 283: 262:
from some assumptions on the spectrum of particles. It is a form of
279: 329:, it is naively inconsistent with the observed Regge behavior of 313:
The reason the program had any hope of success was because of
290:
and others went so far as to question the distinction between
129: 59: 18: 254:" is used for a class of theories that use very general 160:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 274:In the 1960s and '70s, the ever-growing list of 87:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 435:"Physicists Uncover Geometric 'Theory Space'" 8: 53:Learn how and when to remove these messages 238:Learn how and when to remove this message 220:Learn how and when to remove this message 118:Learn how and when to remove this message 485:"Why the Laws of Physics Are Inevitable" 433:Wolchover, Natalie (23 February 2017). 425: 483:Wolchover, Natalie (9 December 2019). 463:S-Matrix theory of strong interactions 7: 258:criteria to determine the form of a 158:adding citations to reliable sources 14: 34:This article has multiple issues. 134: 64: 23: 145:needs additional citations for 42:or discuss these issues on the 390:published an article in which 1: 353:and many others constructed 16:Class of theories in physics 529: 465:. New York: W.A. Benjamin. 73:This article includes a 102:more precise citations. 363:quantum chromodynamics 310:two decades earlier. 511:Quantum field theory 344:(the forces), while 342:scattering amplitude 296:elementary particles 276:strongly interacting 154:improve this article 415:Conformal bootstrap 410:Stanley Mandelstam 351:Gabriele Veneziano 278:particles — 75:list of references 308:Werner Heisenberg 300:nuclear democracy 248: 247: 240: 230: 229: 222: 204: 169:"Bootstrap model" 128: 127: 120: 57: 518: 492: 461:G. Chew (1962). 450: 449: 447: 445: 430: 298:, advocating a " 243: 236: 225: 218: 214: 211: 205: 203: 162: 138: 130: 123: 116: 112: 109: 103: 98:this article by 89:inline citations 68: 67: 60: 49: 27: 26: 19: 528: 527: 521: 520: 519: 517: 516: 515: 496: 495: 489:Quanta Magazine 482: 479: 477:Further reading 458: 453: 443: 441: 439:Quanta magazine 432: 431: 427: 423: 401: 387:Quanta Magazine 272: 264:S-matrix theory 252:bootstrap model 244: 233: 232: 231: 226: 215: 209: 206: 163: 161: 151: 139: 124: 113: 107: 104: 93: 79:related reading 69: 65: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 526: 525: 522: 514: 513: 508: 498: 497: 494: 493: 478: 475: 474: 473: 472:, 93, 229–268. 466: 457: 454: 452: 451: 424: 422: 419: 418: 417: 412: 407: 400: 397: 338:Regge behavior 319:perturbatively 271: 268: 260:quantum theory 246: 245: 228: 227: 142: 140: 133: 126: 125: 83:external links 72: 70: 63: 58: 32: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 524: 523: 512: 509: 507: 504: 503: 501: 490: 486: 481: 480: 476: 471: 467: 464: 460: 459: 455: 440: 436: 429: 426: 420: 416: 413: 411: 408: 406: 403: 402: 398: 396: 393: 389: 388: 382: 380: 379: 378:Bootstrapping 374: 372: 368: 364: 358: 356: 355:string theory 352: 347: 343: 339: 334: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 311: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288:Geoffrey Chew 285: 281: 277: 269: 267: 265: 261: 257: 253: 242: 239: 224: 221: 213: 202: 199: 195: 192: 188: 185: 181: 178: 174: 171: –  170: 166: 165:Find sources: 159: 155: 149: 148: 143:This article 141: 137: 132: 131: 122: 119: 111: 101: 97: 91: 90: 84: 80: 76: 71: 62: 61: 56: 54: 47: 46: 41: 40: 35: 30: 21: 20: 488: 469: 462: 442:. Retrieved 438: 428: 405:Tullio Regge 391: 385: 383: 376: 375: 359: 335: 323:field theory 312: 299: 273: 251: 249: 234: 216: 207: 197: 190: 183: 176: 164: 152:Please help 147:verification 144: 114: 105: 94:Please help 86: 50: 43: 37: 36:Please help 33: 327:confinement 256:consistency 100:introducing 506:Scattering 500:Categories 456:References 250:The term " 180:newspapers 39:improve it 444:1 October 392:bootstrap 346:unitarity 292:composite 210:June 2015 108:June 2015 45:talk page 399:See also 384:In 2017 321:through 315:crossing 304:S-matrix 270:Overview 331:hadrons 284:baryons 194:scholar 96:improve 371:gluons 367:quarks 280:mesons 196:  189:  182:  175:  167:  421:Notes 201:JSTOR 187:books 81:, or 470:Isis 446:2021 369:and 294:and 282:and 173:news 373:. 156:by 502:: 487:. 437:. 333:. 266:. 85:, 77:, 48:. 491:. 448:. 241:) 235:( 223:) 217:( 212:) 208:( 198:· 191:· 184:· 177:· 150:. 121:) 115:( 110:) 106:( 92:. 55:) 51:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Bootstrap model"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Learn how and when to remove this message
consistency
quantum theory
S-matrix theory
strongly interacting
mesons
baryons
Geoffrey Chew
composite

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.