Knowledge (XXG)

Bowley's law

Source 📝

114:. Due to the necessity of aggregating wage data from different sources, many early studies on the growth or decline of the wage share, including Bowley's and Kalecki's research in the 1930s, were fraught with measurement and comparability issues. As national accounting in Great Britain and the United States improved, studies such as 169:
Only in the early 2000s did academic interest in Bowley's law begin to resurface. Since then a substantial body of economic research has cast strong doubts on whether Bowley's law holds in post-1960 data. More specifically, recent research strongly suggests that in most major economies, including the
90:) evidence for his speculation in a comparison between the UK's wage shares in 1911 and 1924, Bowley became the first to clearly assert the constancy of the wage share in his 1937 book 134:(1959). Even though academic interest in Bowley's law waned from the 1960s on, its impact on economic theory was profound. Through its influence on the macroeconomic research of 122:(1954) found wage shares to be constant. As a consequence, the constancy of the wage share was widely accepted as stylized fact among economists, e.g. becoming part of 150:
who developed macroeconomic theories able to account for the existence of a constant wage share. Analogously, Bowley's law is reflected in the development of
52:. Research conducted near the start of the 21st century, however, found wage share to have declined since the 1980s in most major economies. 796: 110:
Since its beginnings in the 1920s, empirical research on the distribution of factor shares has been intimately tied to the development of
346: 159: 801: 424:
Kuznets, S. (1959). "Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: IV. Distribution of National Income by Factor Shares".
166:, which neoclassical macroeconomics seek to explain, implies that it considerably shaped the development of modern economic theory. 309: 307:
Phelps Brown, E. H.; Weber, B. (1953). "Accumulation, Productivity, and Distribution in the British Economy, 1870–1938".
533: 766:
Wages in the United Kingdom in the Nineteenth Century: Notes for the Use of Students of Social and Economic Questions
39: 469: 143: 674: 699: 731: 151: 86:. Having already speculated in 1920 that the wage share might be constant and having found (together with 35: 126:
on modern economic growth. This consensus met strong empirical challenges in the late 1950s, e.g. from
496:
Krämer, H. M. (2011). "Bowley's Law: The Diffusion of an Empirical Supposition into Economic Theory".
272:
Krämer, H. M. (2011). "Bowley's Law: The Diffusion of an Empirical Supposition into Economic Theory".
187:
Krämer, H. M. (2011). "Bowley's Law: The Diffusion of an Empirical Supposition into Economic Theory".
387: 70: 736: 139: 111: 95: 569: 704: 614: 550: 513: 478: 449: 441: 406: 363: 326: 289: 254: 204: 115: 42:
for their work (usually in the form of wages), remains constant over time. It is named after the
344:
Johnson, D. G. (1954). "The Functional Distribution of Income in the United States, 1850–1952".
655: 163: 135: 123: 659: 237:
Carter, S. (2007). "Real wage productivity elasticity across advanced economies, 1963–1996".
741: 694: 686: 645: 604: 596: 542: 505: 433: 396: 355: 318: 281: 246: 196: 119: 764: 776: 102:
who perceived the factor shares of land, capital, and labor to be inherently flexible.
83: 65: 790: 708: 618: 453: 258: 147: 127: 99: 79: 75: 49: 27: 554: 467:
Solow, R. M. (1958). "A Skeptical Note on the Constancy of Relative Factor Shares".
170:
U.S., the wage share has substantially and significantly declined since the 1980s.
131: 87: 587:
Bentolila, S.; Saint-Paul, G. (2003). "Explaining Movements in the Labor Share".
162:
in the 1930s. Perhaps most importantly, the inclusion of Bowley's law as one of
250: 650: 633: 155: 31: 722:
Karabournis, L.; Neiman, B. (2014). "The Global Decline of the Labor Share".
82:, who pioneered the collection and statistical analysis of wage data in the 46: 600: 690: 78:
of a constant wage share. Thereby, Samuelson meant to honor the economist
745: 509: 285: 200: 517: 293: 208: 482: 445: 410: 367: 330: 43: 609: 401: 382: 359: 322: 546: 437: 634:"Effects of Globalization on Labor's Share in National Income" 68:
in 1964 in the sixth American edition of his classic textbook
94:. This finding was remarkably at odds with the teachings of 498:
Cahiers d'Économie Politique/Papers in Political Economy
274:
Cahiers d'Économie Politique/Papers in Political Economy
189:
Cahiers d'Économie Politique/Papers in Political Economy
775: 531:Gollin, D. (2002). "Getting Income Shares Right". 778:Wages and Income in the United Kingdom Since 1860 700:20.500.11820/33fb6813-7bf1-4c77-a9c9-885a07b7fae4 92:Wages and Income in the United Kingdom since 1860 34:of a country, i.e., the share of a country's 8: 769:. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 572:. In Durlauf, S. B.; Blume, L. E. (eds.). 735: 698: 649: 608: 400: 782:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 574:The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 426:Economic Development and Cultural Change 179: 679:Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 675:"The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share" 673:Elsby, M. W. L.; et al. (2013). 226:. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 736. 7: 239:Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 224:Economics: An Introductory Textbook 30:of economics which states that the 347:Review of Economics and Statistics 14: 589:Contributions to Macroeconomics 724:Quarterly Journal of Economics 310:Quarterly Journal of Economics 38:that is given to employees as 24:law of the constant wage share 1: 534:Journal of Political Economy 383:"A Model of Economic Growth" 797:Eponymous laws of economics 818: 570:"Labour's share of income" 251:10.2753/PKE0160-3477290403 16:Stylized fact of economics 651:10.5089/9781451865547.001 144:Post-Keynesian economists 802:1937 in economic history 470:American Economic Review 774:Bowley, A. L. (1937). 763:Bowley, A. L. (1900). 601:10.2202/1534-6005.1103 222:Samuelson, P. (1964). 691:10.1353/eca.2013.0016 632:Guscina, A. (2006). 510:10.3917/cep.061.0019 388:The Economic Journal 286:10.3917/cep.061.0019 201:10.3917/cep.061.0019 118:and Weber (1953) or 96:classical economists 22:, also known as the 568:Gollin, D. (2008). 432:(3 Part 2): 1–100. 381:Kaldor, N. (1957). 112:national accounting 746:10.1093/qje/qjt032 74:as a name for the 64:was first used by 809: 783: 781: 770: 750: 749: 739: 719: 713: 712: 702: 670: 664: 663: 653: 638:IMF Staff Papers 629: 623: 622: 612: 584: 578: 577: 565: 559: 558: 528: 522: 521: 493: 487: 486: 464: 458: 457: 421: 415: 414: 404: 378: 372: 371: 341: 335: 334: 317:(250): 263–288. 304: 298: 297: 269: 263: 262: 234: 228: 227: 219: 213: 212: 184: 142:, it influenced 817: 816: 812: 811: 810: 808: 807: 806: 787: 786: 773: 762: 759: 754: 753: 721: 720: 716: 672: 671: 667: 631: 630: 626: 586: 585: 581: 576:(2nd ed.). 567: 566: 562: 530: 529: 525: 495: 494: 490: 466: 465: 461: 423: 422: 418: 402:10.2307/2227704 395:(67): 591–624. 380: 379: 375: 360:10.2307/1924668 343: 342: 338: 323:10.2307/2227124 306: 305: 301: 271: 270: 266: 245:(4): 573–600 . 236: 235: 231: 221: 220: 216: 186: 185: 181: 176: 154:wage theory by 108: 58: 36:economic output 17: 12: 11: 5: 815: 813: 805: 804: 799: 789: 788: 785: 784: 771: 758: 755: 752: 751: 737:10.1.1.649.273 714: 665: 624: 579: 560: 547:10.1086/338747 541:(2): 458–474. 523: 488: 477:(4): 618–631. 459: 438:10.1086/449811 416: 373: 354:(2): 175–182. 336: 299: 264: 229: 214: 178: 177: 175: 172: 164:Kaldor's facts 124:Kaldor's facts 107: 104: 66:Paul Samuelson 57: 54: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 814: 803: 800: 798: 795: 794: 792: 780: 779: 772: 768: 767: 761: 760: 756: 747: 743: 738: 733: 730:(1): 61–103. 729: 725: 718: 715: 710: 706: 701: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 669: 666: 661: 657: 652: 647: 643: 639: 635: 628: 625: 620: 616: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 583: 580: 575: 571: 564: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 535: 527: 524: 519: 515: 511: 507: 504:(2): 19–49 . 503: 499: 492: 489: 484: 480: 476: 472: 471: 463: 460: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 420: 417: 412: 408: 403: 398: 394: 390: 389: 384: 377: 374: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 348: 340: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 311: 303: 300: 295: 291: 287: 283: 280:(2): 19–49 . 279: 275: 268: 265: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 233: 230: 225: 218: 215: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195:(2): 19–49 . 194: 190: 183: 180: 173: 171: 167: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 148:Joan Robinson 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 103: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 80:Arthur Bowley 77: 76:stylized fact 73: 72: 67: 63: 55: 53: 51: 50:Arthur Bowley 48: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 28:stylized fact 25: 21: 777: 765: 727: 723: 717: 682: 678: 668: 641: 637: 627: 592: 588: 582: 573: 563: 538: 532: 526: 501: 497: 491: 474: 468: 462: 429: 425: 419: 392: 386: 376: 351: 345: 339: 314: 308: 302: 277: 273: 267: 242: 238: 232: 223: 217: 192: 188: 182: 168: 160:Paul Douglas 152:neoclassical 116:Phelps-Brown 109: 91: 88:Josiah Stamp 69: 62:Bowley's law 61: 59: 40:compensation 23: 20:Bowley's law 19: 18: 685:(2): 1–63. 595:(1): 1–31. 791:Categories 644:(294): 1. 174:References 156:John Hicks 130:(1959) or 32:wage share 732:CiteSeerX 709:154352931 619:155054474 610:10230/343 454:154604869 259:154904142 71:Economics 60:The term 47:economist 555:55836142 518:43107795 294:43107795 209:43107795 106:Research 757:Sources 483:1808271 446:1151715 411:2227704 368:1924668 331:2227124 136:Kalecki 128:Kuznets 120:Johnson 100:Ricardo 56:Origins 44:English 26:, is a 734:  707:  660:956758 658:  617:  553:  516:  481:  452:  444:  409:  366:  329:  292:  257:  207:  140:Keynes 705:S2CID 615:S2CID 551:S2CID 514:JSTOR 479:JSTOR 450:S2CID 442:JSTOR 407:JSTOR 364:JSTOR 327:JSTOR 290:JSTOR 255:S2CID 205:JSTOR 146:like 132:Solow 98:like 656:SSRN 158:and 138:and 742:doi 728:129 695:hdl 687:doi 646:doi 605:hdl 597:doi 543:doi 539:110 506:doi 434:doi 397:doi 393:268 356:doi 319:doi 282:doi 247:doi 197:doi 793:: 740:. 726:. 703:. 693:. 683:47 681:. 677:. 654:. 642:06 640:. 636:. 613:. 603:. 591:. 549:. 537:. 512:. 502:61 500:. 475:48 473:. 448:. 440:. 428:. 405:. 391:. 385:. 362:. 352:36 350:. 325:. 315:63 313:. 288:. 278:61 276:. 253:. 243:29 241:. 203:. 193:61 191:. 84:UK 748:. 744:: 711:. 697:: 689:: 662:. 648:: 621:. 607:: 599:: 593:3 557:. 545:: 520:. 508:: 485:. 456:. 436:: 430:7 413:. 399:: 370:. 358:: 333:. 321:: 296:. 284:: 261:. 249:: 211:. 199::

Index

stylized fact
wage share
economic output
compensation
English
economist
Arthur Bowley
Paul Samuelson
Economics
stylized fact
Arthur Bowley
UK
Josiah Stamp
classical economists
Ricardo
national accounting
Phelps-Brown
Johnson
Kaldor's facts
Kuznets
Solow
Kalecki
Keynes
Post-Keynesian economists
Joan Robinson
neoclassical
John Hicks
Paul Douglas
Kaldor's facts
doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.