Knowledge (XXG)

Browne–Fitzpatrick privilege case, 1955

Source 📝

267:. In a 1996 paper, he wrote "The two men were convicted and imprisoned by Parliament for contempt of Parliament without being given an opportunity to address Parliament on the question of their guilt or innocence. They were convicted in absentia, in the absence of any specification in the warrant of commitment of the nature of the breach of privilege of which they were convicted, and after they were denied representation by counsel who was to appear on their behalf in the Committee of Privileges and in the House. As counsel who was refused leave to appear, my sense of outrage over Parliament's denial of due process and natural justice remains undimmed after a lapse of 40 years". 22: 211:
at the time) appeared before the committee and were questioned by its members. The Committee report, presented to the House of Representatives on 8 June 1955, concluded that a breach of privilege had occurred and recommended that the House take appropriate action.
194:
businessman and political rival of Morgan. Morgan ended his speech by moving that the newspaper article be referred to the House of Representatives Standing Committee of Privileges (the "Privileges Committee") for investigation. The House approved the motion.
220:
The House determined that Browne and Fitzpatrick be required to appear before the Bar of the Chamber on 10 June 1955 to answer the charges brought against them. Having heard statements from both men, the House, on a motion from
39: 170:
In an article headed "MHR and Immigration Racket", it was alleged that Morgan, a lawyer before entering Parliament, had engaged in corrupt schemes involving refugee migration from
275:
From 1944 until 1987, all meetings of the Privileges Committee were held behind closed doors, and none of the evidence or other material it considered was made public.
86: 58: 454: 65: 72: 434: 247:
It was the first time anyone had ever been called to the Bar of the lower house, and it was the only time the Parliament has ever jailed anyone.
233: 439: 319: 144: 54: 444: 152: 346:
Anthony Mason, 'A New Perspective on Separation of Powers', Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, No. 82, December 1996, 1 at 5
105: 424: 356: 429: 203:
Over the ensuing weeks, the Privileges Committee met on a number of occasions to deal with the matter. Morgan, Fitzpatrick and
79: 279: 43: 278:
In December 2000, the Parliament voted to publish the evidence from the Browne-Fitzpatrick case, and it is now held in the
291: 241: 222: 191: 232:
considered an appeal on 22 and 24 June 1955, but the matter was dismissed. Browne and Fitzpatrick applied to the
32: 449: 204: 236:
for leave to appeal against the High Court's judgment, but leave was refused. The sentences were served in the
124: 264: 229: 167:
for 28 April 1955 had impugned his personal honour and challenged his fitness to be a Member of Parliament.
132: 128: 148: 260: 385: 357:"National Archives of Australia, The Browne–Fitzpatrick privilege case, 1955 – Fact sheet 204" 403: 156: 394:
Moore, Andrew (2012). "The Apostasy of Allan Fraser: The ALP and Civil Liberties in 1955".
360: 160: 225: 418: 407: 248: 179: 323:, 6th ed, Chapter 19: "Parliamentary privilege", pp. 733, 734, 754, 761, 762, 771 21: 190:
that included the Reid electorate, was owned by Raymond Edward Fitzpatrick, a
175: 237: 228:, voted that Browne and Fitzpatrick be committed to 90 days in gaol. The 251:
has described it as the House using its new mace to swat two blowflies.
187: 171: 186:, a free weekly newspaper distributed throughout areas of suburban 263:, junior counsel for Fitzpatrick and later Chief Justice of the 15: 163:, informed Parliament that an article appearing in the 46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 240:police lock-up (while appeals were pending) and 120:R v Richards; Ex parte Fitzpatrick and Browne 8: 259:The case left an "indelible impression" on 106:Learn how and when to remove this message 55:"Browne–Fitzpatrick privilege case, 1955" 303: 315: 313: 311: 309: 307: 127:157, was a legal case concerning the 7: 386:Australian Dictionary of Biography, 44:adding citations to reliable sources 455:Australian House of Representatives 216:Called before the Bar of the House 14: 321:House of Representatives Practice 20: 31:needs additional citations for 435:Political history of Australia 408:10.5263/labourhistory.103.0187 280:National Archives of Australia 1: 440:Australian constitutional law 292:Imprisonment of John Drayton 471: 445:Legal history of Australia 153:House of Representatives 425:Parliament of Australia 388:Brown, Francis Courtney 265:High Court of Australia 230:High Court of Australia 430:1955 in Australian law 133:Australian Parliament 199:Privileges Committee 40:improve this article 255:Impact on observers 207:(the editor of the 335:Acts of Parliament 271:Documents released 209:Bankstown Observer 184:Bankstown Observer 165:Bankstown Observer 129:right of privilege 116: 115: 108: 90: 462: 450:1955 in case law 411: 402:(103): 187–202. 373: 372: 370: 368: 359:. Archived from 353: 347: 344: 338: 331: 325: 317: 157:Division of Reid 111: 104: 100: 97: 91: 89: 48: 24: 16: 470: 469: 465: 464: 463: 461: 460: 459: 415: 414: 393: 382: 377: 376: 366: 364: 363:on 5 April 2013 355: 354: 350: 345: 341: 332: 328: 318: 305: 300: 288: 273: 257: 218: 201: 161:New South Wales 143:On 3 May 1955, 141: 112: 101: 95: 92: 49: 47: 37: 25: 12: 11: 5: 468: 466: 458: 457: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 427: 417: 416: 413: 412: 396:Labour History 391: 381: 378: 375: 374: 348: 339: 333:Gavin Souter, 326: 302: 301: 299: 296: 295: 294: 287: 284: 272: 269: 256: 253: 226:Robert Menzies 223:Prime Minister 217: 214: 200: 197: 151:member of the 145:Charles Morgan 140: 137: 114: 113: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 467: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 431: 428: 426: 423: 422: 420: 409: 405: 401: 397: 392: 390: 389: 384: 383: 379: 362: 358: 352: 349: 343: 340: 337:, pp. 431-433 336: 330: 327: 324: 322: 316: 314: 312: 310: 308: 304: 297: 293: 290: 289: 285: 283: 281: 276: 270: 268: 266: 262: 261:Anthony Mason 254: 252: 250: 245: 243: 242:Goulburn Gaol 239: 235: 234:Privy Council 231: 227: 224: 215: 213: 210: 206: 198: 196: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 138: 136: 134: 130: 126: 122: 121: 110: 107: 99: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: 67: 64: 60: 57: –  56: 52: 51:Find sources: 45: 41: 35: 34: 29:This article 27: 23: 18: 17: 399: 395: 387: 365:. Retrieved 361:the original 351: 342: 334: 329: 320: 277: 274: 258: 249:Gavin Souter 246: 219: 208: 205:Frank Browne 202: 183: 180:World War II 169: 164: 142: 119: 118: 117: 102: 93: 83: 76: 69: 62: 50: 38:Please help 33:verification 30: 419:Categories 298:References 139:Background 123:(1955) 92 96:April 2013 66:newspapers 192:Bankstown 176:Australia 367:30 March 286:See also 238:Canberra 155:for the 380:Sources 178:before 131:of the 80:scholar 188:Sydney 182:. The 172:Europe 82:  75:  68:  61:  53:  149:Labor 87:JSTOR 73:books 369:2013 59:news 404:doi 400:103 174:to 159:in 125:CLR 42:by 421:: 398:. 306:^ 282:. 244:. 147:, 135:. 410:. 406:: 371:. 109:) 103:( 98:) 94:( 84:· 77:· 70:· 63:· 36:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Browne–Fitzpatrick privilege case, 1955"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
CLR
right of privilege
Australian Parliament
Charles Morgan
Labor
House of Representatives
Division of Reid
New South Wales
Europe
Australia
World War II
Sydney
Bankstown
Frank Browne
Prime Minister
Robert Menzies
High Court of Australia
Privy Council
Canberra

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.