221:
usually in return for a periodic payment in money. An agreement having these characteristics creates a relationship of landlord and tenant to which the common law or statute may then attach various incidents. The fact that the parties use language more appropriate to a different kind of agreement, such as a licence, is irrelevant if upon its true construction it has the identifying characteristics of a lease. The meaning of the agreement, for example, as to the extent of the possession which it grants, depend upon the intention of the parties, objectively ascertained by reference to the language and relevant background. The decision of your
Lordships' House in
39:
268:. If it was a breach of a term of the licence from the council, that would have been because it was a tenancy. The licence could not have turned it into something else. Mr. Bruton's agreement is irrelevant because one cannot contract out of the statute. The trust's lack of title is also irrelevant, but I shall consider this point at a later stage. In
263:
do make distinctions between different kinds of landlords, it is not by saying that what would be a tenancy if granted by one landlord will be something else if granted by another. The alleged breach of the Trust's licence is irrelevant because there is no suggestion that the grant of a tenancy would
229:
In this case, it seems to me that the agreement, construed against the relevant background, plainly gave Mr. Bruton a right to exclusive possession. There is nothing to suggest that he was to share possession with the Trust, the council or anyone else. The Trust did not retain such control over the
152:
case that examined the rights of a 'tenant' in a situation where the 'landlord', a charitable housing association had no authority to grant a tenancy, but in which the 'tenant' sought to enforce the duty to repair on the association implied under landlord and tenant statutes. The effect of the case
318:
Traditionally it has been held that an estate interest (interest in land) can only arise out of one of equal or superior status. A licence is not an estate interest, and provides essentially only access to another's estate. However, the implication of the Bruton case "controversially confirms the
220:
A.C. 809 is authority for the proposition that a "lease" or "tenancy" is a contractually binding agreement, not referable to any other relationship between the parties, by which one person gives another the right to exclusive occupation of land for a fixed or renewable period or periods of time,
225:
A.C. 288 is a good example of the importance of background in deciding whether the agreement grants exclusive possession or not. But the classification of the agreement as a lease does not depend upon any intention additional to that expressed in the choice of terms. It is simply a question of
205:
held it did not matter that the landlord did not have a property right in its title. Exclusive possession is the essence of a lease, and irrelevant that the agreement purported to be a licence. The term that Mr Bruton could be told to vacate on reasonable notice was ineffective, as one cannot
251:
A.C. 809. These circumstances were that the Trust was a responsible landlord performing socially valuable functions, it had agreed with the council not to grant tenancies, Mr. Bruton had agreed that he was not to have a tenancy and the Trust had no estate out of which it could grant one.
242:
A.C. 809, 818, such an express reservation "only serves to emphasise the fact that the grantee is entitled to exclusive possession and is a tenant." Nor was there any other relationship between the parties to which Mr. Bruton's exclusive possession could be referable.
179:, Mr Bruton agreed with the trust to pay weekly rent for a flat. There was a provision that the council and LQHT had access to the property at limited times. Then he claimed he was a tenant, and the trust had an obligation to repair the flat under the
284:
A.C. 809 and came to the conclusion that there was not. I respectfully agree. For these reasons I consider that the agreement between the Trust and Mr. Bruton was a lease within the meaning of section 11 of the
Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
295:. But it is the fact that the agreement is a lease which creates the proprietary interest. It is putting the cart before the horse to say that whether the agreement is a lease depends upon whether it creates a proprietary interest...
246:
Mr. Henderson Q.C., who appeared for the Trust, submitted that there were "special circumstances" in this case which enabled one to construe the agreement as a licence despite the presence of all the characteristics identified in
290:
A lease may, and usually does, create a proprietary interest called a leasehold estate or, technically, a “term of years absolute.” This will depend upon whether the landlord had an interest out of which he could grant it.
206:
contract out of statute. LQHT's lack of legal title was also irrelevant because the character of the agreement, not the nature of the landlord, was the key point for deciding whether a lease existed under the LTA 1985.
298:
For these reasons I would allow the appeal and declare that Mr. Bruton was a tenant. I should add that I express no view on whether he was a secure tenant or on the rights of the council to recover possession of the
319:
existence in
English Law of the phenomenon of the contractual or non-proprietary lease". It has been suggested by some commentators however, that Bruton was driven by policy as established in
189:(literally meaning "no one gives what he does not have"), so because they had no lease, they could not grant a lease to Mr Bruton, and therefore they had no obligation to repair the property.
255:
In my opinion none of these circumstances can make an agreement to grant exclusive possession something other than a tenancy. The character of the landlord is irrelevant because although the
323:, that individuals enjoying exclusive possession should be protected. There has been little reliance on the “Bruton tenancy” in later cases and it remains controversial.
307:
490:
621:
198:
55:
479:
352:
106:
502:
303:
273:
611:
171:, a charitable association, a licence to use land to accommodate the homeless. For a place at Flat 2, Oval House, Rushcroft Road, in
378:
235:
168:
234:
A.C. 288. The only rights which it reserved were for itself and the council to enter at certain times and for limited purposes. As
201:
held the agreement did create a tenancy and the trust was therefore under an obligation to repair. Giving the leading judgment,
626:
159:
landlord (who does not own a property but houses an occupier in a specific room at a rent) and tenant between the parties.
616:
211:
180:
123:
Lord Slynn of Hadley; Lord
Jauncey of Tullichettle; Lord Hoffmann; Lord Hope of Craighead; Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough
38:
368:
345:
280:
gave careful consideration to whether any exceptional ground existed for making an exception to the principle in
418:
396:
92:
Emergency Powers (Defence) Act 1939; Housing Act 1985; Landlord and Tenant Act 1985; Law of
Property Act 1925
468:
260:
185:
17:
407:
338:
387:
429:
216:
513:
277:
230:
premises as was inconsistent with Mr. Bruton having exclusive possession, as was the case in
543:
524:
440:
265:
149:
214:
or any other legislation which refers to a lease or tenancy? The decision of this House in
451:
605:
202:
145:
457:
226:
characterising the terms which the parties have agreed. This is a question of law.
73:
272:
1 W.L.R. 779, where the facts were very similar to those in the present case, the
183:
section 11. The
Housing Trust argued that under orthodox property law principles,
264:
have been ultra vires either the Trust or the council: see section 32(3) of the
210:
Did this agreement create a "lease" or "tenancy" within the meaning of the
528:
256:
155:
172:
44:
532:
176:
330:
334:
596:
127:
119:
114:
101:
96:
88:
80:
69:
61:
51:
31:
208:
346:
8:
492:Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
18:Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
353:
339:
331:
141:Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
37:
32:Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
28:
554:
480:Prudential Ltd v London Residuary Body
276:construed the "licence" as a tenancy.
76:, 1 AC 406, 3 WLR 150, 3 All ER 481
7:
133:Leases; Licenses; Possession of Land
107:Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council
574:Susan Bright (1998) 114 LQR 345-351
503:European Convention on Human Rights
270:Family Housing Association v Jones
232:Westminster City Council v. Clarke
25:
379:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
223:Westminster City Council v Clarke
169:London and Quadrant Housing Trust
153:is to create the relationship of
622:1999 in United Kingdom case law
597:The London and Quadrant website
586:S Bright (1998) 114 LQR 345-351
1:
212:Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
181:Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
84:Street v Mountford AC 809;
643:
369:Land Registration Act 2002
612:English property case law
521:
510:
500:
487:
476:
465:
448:
437:
426:
415:
404:
394:
385:
376:
366:
132:
36:
419:Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
397:Law of Property Act 1925
261:Landlord and Tenant Acts
505:art 8 and Prot 1, art 1
469:AG Securities v Vaughan
293:Nemo dat quod non habet
186:nemo dat quod non habet
301:
146:[1999] UKHL 26
627:English land case law
408:Errington v Errington
399:ss 1 and 205(1)(xvii)
167:The council gave the
617:House of Lords cases
388:Family Law Act 1996
430:Street v Mountford
321:Street v Mountford
282:Street v Mountford
249:Street v Mountford
240:Street v Mountford
217:Street v Mountford
561:Gray & Gray,
539:
538:
514:Kay v Lambeth LBC
361:Sources on leases
137:
136:
102:Subsequent action
89:Legislation cited
16:(Redirected from
634:
575:
572:
566:
559:
544:English land law
525:English land law
493:
441:Mikeover v Brady
355:
348:
341:
332:
266:Housing Act 1985
150:English land law
115:Court membership
43:Rushcroft Road,
41:
29:
21:
642:
641:
637:
636:
635:
633:
632:
631:
602:
601:
593:
583:
578:
573:
569:
560:
556:
552:
540:
535:
517:
506:
496:
491:
483:
472:
461:
444:
433:
422:
411:
400:
390:
381:
372:
362:
359:
329:
316:
274:Court of Appeal
195:
165:
47:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
640:
638:
630:
629:
624:
619:
614:
604:
603:
600:
599:
592:
591:External links
589:
588:
587:
582:
579:
577:
576:
567:
565:(OUP 2007) 158
553:
551:
548:
547:
546:
537:
536:
522:
519:
518:
511:
508:
507:
501:
498:
497:
488:
485:
484:
477:
474:
473:
466:
463:
462:
452:Aslan v Murphy
449:
446:
445:
438:
435:
434:
427:
424:
423:
416:
413:
412:
405:
402:
401:
395:
392:
391:
386:
383:
382:
377:
374:
373:
367:
364:
363:
360:
358:
357:
350:
343:
335:
328:
325:
315:
312:
236:Lord Templeman
199:House of Lords
194:
191:
164:
161:
135:
134:
130:
129:
125:
124:
121:
120:Judges sitting
117:
116:
112:
111:
103:
99:
98:
94:
93:
90:
86:
85:
82:
78:
77:
71:
67:
66:
63:
59:
58:
56:House of Lords
53:
49:
48:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
639:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
609:
607:
598:
595:
594:
590:
585:
584:
580:
571:
568:
564:
558:
555:
549:
545:
542:
541:
534:
530:
526:
520:
516:
515:
509:
504:
499:
495:
494:
486:
482:
481:
475:
471:
470:
464:
460:
459:
454:
453:
447:
443:
442:
436:
432:
431:
425:
421:
420:
414:
410:
409:
403:
398:
393:
389:
384:
380:
375:
370:
365:
356:
351:
349:
344:
342:
337:
336:
333:
326:
324:
322:
313:
311:
309:
305:
300:
296:
294:
288:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
258:
253:
250:
244:
241:
237:
233:
227:
224:
219:
218:
213:
207:
204:
203:Lord Hoffmann
200:
192:
190:
188:
187:
182:
178:
174:
170:
162:
160:
158:
157:
151:
147:
143:
142:
131:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
72:
68:
64:
60:
57:
54:
50:
46:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
570:
562:
557:
512:
489:
478:
467:
458:Duke v Wynne
456:
450:
439:
428:
417:
406:
320:
317:
314:Significance
308:Lord Jauncey
302:
297:
292:
289:
287:
281:
269:
254:
248:
245:
239:
231:
228:
222:
215:
209:
196:
184:
166:
154:
140:
139:
138:
105:
97:Case history
65:24 June 1999
26:
310:concurred.
81:Cases cited
606:Categories
581:References
304:Lord Slynn
278:Slade L.J.
259:and other
257:Rent Acts
70:Citations
563:Land Law
529:licenses
327:See also
238:said in
193:Judgment
156:de facto
128:Keywords
173:Brixton
110:UKHL 10
74:UKHL 26
62:Decided
45:Brixton
533:leases
177:London
148:is an
550:Notes
371:s 116
299:flat.
163:Facts
144:
52:Court
531:and
523:see
455:and
306:and
197:The
608::
527:,
175:,
354:e
347:t
340:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
