308:
example of re-cutting would be a roadside ditch being re-cut and emptied of silt and detritus as a form of maintenance. Conversely, a roadside ditch that is never re-cut gives a certain impression about the attitude towards the investment in infrastructure the road represents. Re-cuts by their nature are hard to discern because the re-cut can truncate the original cut in part and be completely in the confines of the original fill in other parts. They can even be absent from the record. Cutting is the reason why not all past activity on a site leaves traces of its existence in the
63:
300:
133:
22:
321:
241:
307:
Re-cuts are cuts made within the confines or near confines of other cuts, often to regain the function of the original cut or harvest material from the original fill. Re-cuts are considered quite valuable as a source of information because they can shed insight on function and attitude over time. An
281:
at the time of its creation, as opposed to a positive context, which adds material to the archaeological record. A cut has zero thickness and no material properties of its own and is defined by the limits of other contexts. Cuts are seen in the record by virtue of the difference between the material
290:
removed and we can clearly see a difference between the ground the pit was cut into, and the material originally filling the pit. Sometimes these differences are not clear and an archaeologist must rely on experience and insight to discover cuts.
276:
such as horizontal truncations like terraced ground. A cut context is sometimes referred to as a "negative context", as opposed to a "positive context". The term denotes that a cut has removed material from the archaeological record or
282:
it was cut through and the material that back-fills it. This difference is seen as an "edge" by the archaeologists on site. This is shown in the picture (Fig. 1), where a
92:
143:
272:, such as a ditch or pit. In layman's terms, a cut can be thought of as a hole that was dug in the past, though cut also applies to other parts of the
35:
412:
227:
114:
49:
433:
428:
201:
158:
173:
253:
180:
75:
85:
79:
71:
390:
350:
309:
187:
96:
395:
345:
169:
365:
355:
329:
283:
278:
268:
that represents a moment in time when other archaeological deposits were removed for the creation of some
265:
41:
375:
333:
273:
269:
360:
380:
287:
328:
The third image (Fig. 3) shows how a ditch cut with at least two re-cuts may appear when viewed
408:
370:
194:
332:. It is possible that numerous other re-cuts took place and were truncated out of the
422:
385:
303:
Fig. 2. Photographer takes a record shot of a horse burial in a Roman ditch re-cut.
249:
132:
299:
150:
320:
240:
319:
298:
239:
126:
56:
15:
407:
The MoLAS archaeological site manual MoLAS, London 1994.
154:
324:
Fig. 3. Section of ditch with at least two re-cuts.
336:by one or more of the re-cuts that has survived.
84:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
8:
159:introducing citations to additional sources
316:Hypothetical ditch re-cuts shown in section
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
228:Learn how and when to remove this message
115:Learn how and when to remove this message
149:Relevant discussion may be found on the
7:
14:
244:Fig. 1. Saxon pit half sectioned.
31:This article has multiple issues.
142:relies largely or entirely on a
131:
61:
20:
39:or discuss these issues on the
1:
254:archaeological stratification
286:Saxon pit has had half its
450:
391:Relationship (archaeology)
351:Archaeological association
396:Single context recording
70:This article includes a
434:Archaeological features
346:Alignment (archaeology)
99:more precise citations.
429:Methods in archaeology
366:Archaeological section
356:Archaeological context
325:
304:
245:
170:"Cut" archaeology
376:Feature (archaeology)
334:archaeological record
323:
302:
274:archaeological record
243:
155:improve this article
361:Archaeological plan
381:Fill (archaeology)
326:
305:
246:
72:list of references
415:. Rb 128pp. bl/wh
371:Cut (earthmoving)
238:
237:
230:
220:
219:
205:
125:
124:
117:
54:
441:
233:
226:
215:
212:
206:
204:
163:
135:
127:
120:
113:
109:
106:
100:
95:this article by
86:inline citations
65:
64:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
449:
448:
444:
443:
442:
440:
439:
438:
419:
418:
404:
342:
318:
297:
234:
223:
222:
221:
216:
210:
207:
164:
162:
148:
136:
121:
110:
104:
101:
90:
76:related reading
66:
62:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
447:
445:
437:
436:
431:
421:
420:
417:
416:
403:
400:
399:
398:
393:
388:
383:
378:
373:
368:
363:
358:
353:
348:
341:
338:
317:
314:
296:
293:
284:half sectioned
236:
235:
218:
217:
153:. Please help
139:
137:
130:
123:
122:
80:external links
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
446:
435:
432:
430:
427:
426:
424:
414:
413:0-904818-40-3
410:
406:
405:
401:
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
386:Harris matrix
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
354:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:
339:
337:
335:
331:
322:
315:
313:
311:
301:
294:
292:
289:
285:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
242:
232:
229:
214:
203:
200:
196:
193:
189:
186:
182:
179:
175:
172: –
171:
167:
166:Find sources:
160:
156:
152:
146:
145:
144:single source
140:This article
138:
134:
129:
128:
119:
116:
108:
98:
94:
88:
87:
81:
77:
73:
68:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
327:
306:
261:
257:
247:
224:
211:October 2012
208:
198:
191:
184:
177:
165:
141:
111:
105:October 2012
102:
91:Please help
83:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
250:archaeology
97:introducing
423:Categories
402:References
330:in section
262:truncation
181:newspapers
36:improve it
151:talk page
42:talk page
340:See also
310:sequence
288:backfill
295:Re-cuts
279:natural
270:feature
266:context
195:scholar
93:improve
411:
197:
190:
183:
176:
168:
264:is a
202:JSTOR
188:books
78:, or
409:ISBN
256:, a
252:and
174:news
260:or
258:cut
248:In
157:by
425::
312:.
82:,
74:,
45:.
231:)
225:(
213:)
209:(
199:·
192:·
185:·
178:·
161:.
147:.
118:)
112:(
107:)
103:(
89:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
