42:
132:
The reason why the employers are liable in such cases is not because they can control the way in which the work is done - they often have not sufficient knowledge to do so - but because they employ the staff and have chosen them for the task and have in their hands the ultimate sanction for good
113:
Mr
Cassidy went to hospital for a routine operation on his hand, but came away with stiff fingers because of the negligence of one of the doctors. He attempted to sue the Ministry of Health in its capacity as employer. The Ministry argued it could not be held responsible and had no vicarious
128:
The Court of Appeal held that the doctor was indeed a servant of the hospital and the
Ministry was vicariously liable, because the doctor was integrated into the health organisation. Denning LJ said,
572:
294:
280:
567:
254:
469:
402:
360:
320:
183:
308:
166:
416:
198:
388:
332:
587:
444:
374:
582:
268:
41:
212:
577:
116:
226:
137:
He also noted, that where a patient selects the doctor, then the doctor will not be employed by a hospital.
159:
80:
430:
203:
216:
102:
484:
240:
152:
503:
94:
17:
378:
420:
406:
448:
434:
364:
350:
346:
188:
561:
474:
458:
98:
479:
392:
258:
244:
230:
336:
120:
where it had been suggested that a surgeon was not the 'servant' of his employer.
144:
148:
504:"Cassidy v Ministry of Health; CA 1951 - swarb.co.uk"
74:
64:
56:
48:
34:
296:Market Invest Ltd v Minister for Social Security
130:
160:
8:
282:Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v SS for Pensions
167:
153:
145:
40:
31:
573:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
255:Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof
495:
27:English tort law and UK labour law case
470:Contract of employment in English law
7:
403:Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd
361:Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd
321:Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner
184:Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttenberg
25:
417:Muscat v Cable & Wireless Plc
199:Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
133:conduct, the power of dismissal.
389:Carmichael v National Power plc
333:Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung
568:United Kingdom labour case law
309:O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
1:
445:Muschett v H M Prison Service
375:McMeechan v SS for Employment
114:liability, relying partly on
101:case concerning the scope of
269:Cassidy v Minister of Health
90:Cassidy v Ministry of Health
35:Cassidy v Ministry of Health
18:Cassidy v Minister of Health
604:
213:Employment Rights Act 1996
175:Workplace protection cases
455:
441:
427:
413:
399:
385:
371:
357:
343:
329:
317:
305:
291:
277:
265:
251:
237:
223:
210:
195:
180:
79:
69:
39:
227:Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
117:Collins v Hertfordshire
60:2 KB 343, 1 All ER 574
135:
81:Contract of employment
588:English tort case law
431:James v Greenwich LBC
583:1951 in British law
103:vicarious liability
485:German labour law
465:
464:
241:Jivraj v Hashwani
86:
85:
16:(Redirected from
595:
578:1951 in case law
544:
541:
535:
532:
526:
520:
519:
517:
515:
500:
297:
283:
169:
162:
155:
146:
95:English tort law
44:
32:
21:
603:
602:
598:
597:
596:
594:
593:
592:
558:
557:
552:
547:
542:
538:
533:
529:
523:
513:
511:
502:
501:
497:
493:
466:
461:
451:
437:
423:
409:
395:
381:
367:
353:
339:
325:
313:
301:
295:
287:
281:
273:
261:
247:
233:
219:
206:
191:
176:
173:
143:
126:
111:
93:2 KB 343 is an
52:Court of Appeal
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
601:
599:
591:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
560:
559:
556:
555:
551:
548:
546:
545:
536:
527:
521:
494:
492:
489:
488:
487:
482:
477:
472:
463:
462:
456:
453:
452:
442:
439:
438:
428:
425:
424:
414:
411:
410:
400:
397:
396:
386:
383:
382:
372:
369:
368:
358:
355:
354:
347:Hall v Lorimer
344:
341:
340:
330:
327:
326:
318:
315:
314:
306:
303:
302:
292:
289:
288:
278:
275:
274:
266:
263:
262:
252:
249:
248:
238:
235:
234:
224:
221:
220:
211:
208:
207:
196:
193:
192:
181:
178:
177:
174:
172:
171:
164:
157:
149:
142:
139:
125:
122:
110:
107:
84:
83:
77:
76:
72:
71:
67:
66:
62:
61:
58:
54:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
36:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
600:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
565:
563:
554:
553:
549:
543:2 KB 343, 362
540:
537:
534:2 KB 343, 361
531:
528:
525:
522:
510:. 7 July 2015
509:
505:
499:
496:
490:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
475:EU labour law
473:
471:
468:
467:
460:
459:UK labour law
454:
450:
447:
446:
440:
436:
433:
432:
426:
422:
419:
418:
412:
408:
405:
404:
398:
394:
391:
390:
384:
380:
379:EWCA Civ 1166
377:
376:
370:
366:
363:
362:
356:
352:
349:
348:
342:
338:
335:
334:
328:
323:
322:
316:
311:
310:
304:
299:
298:
290:
285:
284:
276:
271:
270:
264:
260:
257:
256:
250:
246:
243:
242:
236:
232:
229:
228:
222:
218:
214:
209:
205:
201:
200:
194:
190:
186:
185:
179:
170:
165:
163:
158:
156:
151:
150:
147:
140:
138:
134:
129:
123:
121:
119:
118:
108:
106:
104:
100:
99:UK labour law
96:
92:
91:
82:
78:
73:
68:
65:Case opinions
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
38:
33:
30:
19:
539:
530:
524:
512:. Retrieved
507:
498:
480:US labor law
443:
429:
421:EWCA Civ 220
415:
407:EWCA Civ 217
401:
387:
373:
359:
345:
331:
319:
307:
293:
279:
267:
253:
239:
225:
197:
182:
136:
131:
127:
115:
112:
89:
88:
87:
29:
508:swarb.co.uk
449:EWCA Civ 25
435:EWCA Civ 35
365:EWCA Civ 37
351:EWCA Civ 25
562:Categories
550:References
514:2 December
70:Denning LJ
300:2 QB 173
286:2 QB 497
272:2 KB 343
204:C-397/01
141:See also
124:Judgment
75:Keywords
57:Citation
393:UKHL 47
324:ICR 612
312:ICR 730
259:UKSC 32
245:UKSC 40
231:UKSC 41
202:(2005)
189:C-66/85
187:(1986)
337:UKPC 1
491:Notes
109:Facts
49:Court
516:2016
457:see
97:and
217:230
564::
506:.
215:s
105:.
518:.
168:e
161:t
154:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
