40:
475:) limits physician-assisted suicides to "a competent adult person who clearly consents to the termination of life and has a grievous and irremediable medical condition, including an illness, disease or disability, that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition". The ruling was suspended for 12 months to allow the Canadian parliament to draft a new, constitutional law to replace the existing one.
502:
apparent that the elected House of
Commons would not accept the amendment, a final vote was held on 17 June 2016. At that time, a majority agreed with the restrictive wording provided by the House of Commons indicating that "only patients suffering from incurable illness whose natural death is 'reasonably foreseeable' are eligible for a medically assisted death," as summarized by the
323:
It is a crime in Canada to assist another person in ending her own life. As a result, people who are grievously and irremediably ill cannot seek a physician's assistance in dying and may be condemned to a life of severe and intolerable suffering. A person facing this prospect has two options: she can
332:
had a permissible object, identified as "not, broadly, to preserve life whatever the circumstances, but more specifically to protect vulnerable persons from being induced to commit suicide at a time of weakness." According to the Court, however, the relevant sections were overbroad in catching cases
485:
Specifically the
Supreme Court held that the current legislation was overbroad in that it prohibits "physician‑assisted death for a competent adult person who (1) clearly consents to the termination of life and (2) has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or
412:
could not prevent the federal government from enacting the legislation, since the proposed core of the provincial health powers was overly vague. The Court reaffirmed that health is an area of concurrent jurisdiction, allowing both the federal and provincial legislatures to legislate in the area.
512:
decision was broader, including desperately ill individuals and not only those who are terminally ill or near death. The House of
Commons did accept a few Senate amendments, such as requiring that patients be counselled about alternatives, including palliative care and barring beneficiaries from
253:
The court suspended its ruling for 12 months, with the decision taking effect in 2016, to give the federal government enough time to amend its laws. In
January 2016, the court granted an additional four-month extension to its ruling suspension to allow time for the newly elected federal Liberal
501:
After a lengthy delay, the House of
Commons passed a Bill (C-14) in mid-June 2016 that would allow for doctor-assisted suicide in the case of a terminal illness. The bill was then debated in the Senate. Initially, the Senate amended the bill, expanding the right to die. However, when it became
373:
by ruling trial judges may reconsider the decisions of higher courts if there is a new legal issue at bar, and if circumstances or evidence have "fundamentally shift the parameters of the debate". The Court found that the section 7 legal issues raised in the case at bar differed from those in
492:
The court decision includes a requirement that there must be stringent limits that are "scrupulously monitored." This will require the death certificate to be completed by an independent medical examiner, not the treating physician, to ensure the accuracy of reporting the cause of death.
270:
provided that everyone who aids or abets a person in committing suicide commits an indictable offence, and section 14 stated that no person may consent to death being inflicted on them. The
Supreme Court denied a right to assisted suicide in their 1993 ruling
378:, noting in particular the development of the overbreadth and gross disproportionality principles since 1993. The court also determined that the trial judge was entitled to consider the different "matrix of legislative and social facts" that had arisen since
482:("CMA") reported that not all doctors were willing to help a patient die. However, the belief in late 2015 was that no physician would be forced to do so but the CMA was offering educational sessions to members as to the process that would be used.
254:
government to consult with
Canadians on drafting a law to comply with the ruling. As an interim measure, it also ruled that provincial courts could approve applications for euthanasia until the new law passed.
425:
by others. The BCCLA, appellants at the
Supreme Court, were "overjoyed" by the ruling, holding that "physician-assisted dying will now be recognized for what it is—a medical service". The day of the decision,
243:, thereby giving Canadian adults who are mentally competent and suffering intolerably and enduringly the right to a doctor's assistance in dying. This ruling overturned the Supreme Court's 1993 ruling in
293:
289:
803:
845:
342:
334:
537:
489:
The government subsequently requested a six-month extension for implementation; the arguments for this request were scheduled to be heard by the
Supreme Court in January 2016.
175:
1111:
824:
528:
for an opinion; this tactic would help to move the process along and would preclude the need for individuals to proceed with a very expensive appeal process.
400:
395:
281:
552:
657:
632:
405:
1036:
1116:
1086:
217:
982:
934:
1091:
1009:
436:
column that the Court was being eerily complacent about ramifications of its decision. He also argued that the decision signaled the death of
324:
take her own life prematurely, often by violent or dangerous means, or she can suffer until she dies from natural causes. The choice is cruel.
754:
308:
83:
866:
311:, which overturned the ruling in a 2–1 decision in October 2013. The BCCLA then filed a leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
1096:
871:
525:
445:
357:
304:
273:
245:
142:
955:
1052:
Senator wants to test whether it's constitutional to exclude
Canadians suffering intolerably from non-terminal medical conditions
444:
was particularly critical of the Court, saying, "f you want to write laws, you should run for office." In an op-ed published on
486:
disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition."
1126:
1121:
234:
1106:
479:
409:
887:
1101:
465:
520:
Senators such as Serge Joyal who disagree with the restrictive wording believe that one of the provinces should
367:
is "not a straitjacket that condemns the law to stasis". The Court expanded on their discussion of the issue in
1067:
804:"Crossing the Rubicon, Supreme Court seems eerily complacent about ramifications of assisted suicide ruling"
230:
208:
150:
45:
575:
461:
239:
154:
404:, the Court dismissed the appellants' argument that section 241(b) lay within the core of the provincial
369:
775:
846:"Assisted-suicide ruling part of 'activist' Supreme Court's stance against social conservative values"
39:
547:
307:, which ruled in favour of the BCCLA in June 2012. The federal government appealed the ruling to the
1071:
907:
605:
542:
17:
521:
437:
237:("ALS"). In a unanimous decision on February 6, 2015, the Court struck down the provision in the
138:
120:
700:
682:
225:") by several parties, including the family of Kay Carter, a woman suffering from degenerative
422:
158:
776:"What you need to know about Carter v. Canada: the death with dignity decision in 900 words"
449:
277:, upholding the constitutionality of the prohibitions based upon a thin evidentiary record.
212:
146:
592:
355:
The Court found that the trial judge was not bound by the Supreme Court's 1993 decision in
226:
134:
1080:
892:
850:
829:
808:
686:
441:
432:
363:
61:
514:
504:
457:
427:
130:
658:"Supreme court gives Parliament 4-month extension on doctor-assisted dying law"
288:(law that prohibits aiding a person to commit suicide), claiming they violated
1037:"Serge Joyal urges provinces to test constitutionality of assisted dying law"
333:
that fell outside of the object. Thus, the sections unjustifiably infringed
284:("BCCLA") filed a lawsuit challenging both section 14 and section 241(b) of
759:
825:"Supreme Court euthanasia ruling marks the death of judicial restraint"
981:
Guichon, Alakija; Doig, Mitchell & Thibeault (December 28, 2015).
935:"Supreme Court rules Canadians have right to doctor-assisted suicide"
755:"Reactions to the SCC's historic ruling on doctor-assisted suicide"
780:
557:
1010:"Assisted dying to become law after Senate backs Liberals' bill"
292:(the right to "life, liberty, and security of the person) and
867:"Assisted-suicide ruling response requires nationwide debate"
633:"Canadians Have A Right To Assisted Suicide, High Court Says"
421:
The decision was well received by many, but characterized as
341:; furthermore, this violation was not saved by operation of
956:"Canadian doctors express mixed opinions on assisted dying"
679:
328:
The Court found that section 241(b) and section 14 of the
448:'s website, he called for a nationwide debate concerning
538:
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court)
266:
provision prohibiting suicide. However, 241(b) of the
103:
Criminal prohibition of assisted suicide violates the
983:"Assisted dying: Four problems, one simple solution"
962:. Bell Media. The Canadian Press. December 27, 2015
182:
170:
165:
126:
116:
111:
97:
89:
78:
70:
60:
53:
32:
680:Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
321:
595:, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association
390:The Court affirmed that section 241(b) of the
262:In 1972, the Canadian government repealed the
250:which had denied a right to assisted suicide.
593:Carter v. Canada: The Death with Dignity Case
513:acting in the euthanasia. The bill was given
471:The February 2015 Supreme Court decision in
8:
950:
948:
401:Canada (AG) v PHS Community Services Society
282:British Columbia Civil Liberties Association
712:
710:
553:2015 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
417:Public reaction and planned implementation
508:. Critics of the Bill indicate that the
319:The Court framed the issue at bar thus:
588:
586:
584:
568:
218:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
189:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
27:Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada
1112:Canadian federal government litigation
29:
576:SCC Case Information - Docket S112688
460:argued politicians should invoke the
394:fell within the federal government's
7:
1035:The Canadian Press (June 18, 2016).
464:to send a message to the court that
309:Court of Appeal for British Columbia
84:Court of Appeal for British Columbia
865:Day, Stockwell (14 February 2015).
1008:McCharles, Tonda (June 17, 2016).
886:Black, Conrad (14 February 2015).
823:Coyne, Andrew (13 February 2015).
774:Pastine, Grace (6 February 2015).
215:was challenged as contrary to the
211:decision where the prohibition of
33:Carter v Canada (Attorney General)
25:
18:Carter v Canada (Attorney General)
872:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
802:Coyne, Andrew (6 February 2015).
446:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
396:section 91(27) criminal law power
358:Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG)
305:Supreme Court of British Columbia
274:Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG)
246:Rodriguez v British Columbia (AG)
38:
933:Fine, Sean (February 6, 2015).
844:Gerson, Jen (8 February 2015).
1117:Healthcare in British Columbia
1087:Section Seven Charter case law
497:Subsequent legislative history
1:
1092:Supreme Court of Canada cases
440:in Canada. Former politician
235:amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
888:"Supreme Court on the loose"
753:CTV News (6 February 2015).
480:Canadian Medical Association
452:legislation. In response to
410:Interjurisdictional immunity
398:. Echoing their decision in
914:. SCC/CSC. February 6, 2015
612:. SCC/CSC. February 6, 2015
207:, 2015 SCC 5 is a landmark
1143:
303:The case was heard at the
56:Judgment: February 6, 2015
54:Hearing: October 15, 2014
1097:2015 in Canadian case law
908:"Supreme Court Judgments"
606:"Supreme Court Judgments"
233:, a woman suffering from
187:
102:
37:
1068:Supreme Court of Canada
912:Supreme Court of Canada
734:2011 SCC 44 at para 51.
610:Supreme Court of Canada
578:Supreme Court of Canada
361:, instead holding that
209:Supreme Court of Canada
151:Andromache Karakatsanis
46:Supreme Court of Canada
462:notwithstanding clause
326:
466:Parliament is supreme
370:Canada (AG) v Bedford
1127:Health law in Canada
1122:Euthanasia in Canada
701:Carter v Canada (AG)
548:Euthanasia in Canada
315:Reasons of the Court
204:Carter v Canada (AG)
171:Unanimous reasons by
1107:Euthanasia case law
543:Suicide legislation
473:Carter v Canada (AG
280:In April 2011, the
82:On appeal from the
939:The Globe and Mail
660:. January 15, 2016
438:judicial restraint
386:Division of powers
139:Marshall Rothstein
121:Beverley McLachlin
1016:. Toronto, Canada
989:. Toronto, Canada
524:the issue to its
423:judicial activism
200:
199:
16:(Redirected from
1134:
1102:Assisted suicide
1055:
1054:
1049:
1047:
1032:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1021:
1005:
999:
998:
996:
994:
978:
972:
971:
969:
967:
952:
943:
942:
930:
924:
923:
921:
919:
904:
898:
897:
883:
877:
876:
862:
856:
855:
841:
835:
834:
820:
814:
813:
799:
793:
792:
790:
788:
771:
765:
764:
750:
744:
741:
735:
732:
726:
723:
717:
714:
705:
697:
691:
676:
670:
669:
667:
665:
654:
648:
647:
645:
643:
631:Chappell, Bill.
628:
622:
621:
619:
617:
602:
596:
590:
579:
573:
450:assisted-suicide
213:assisted suicide
147:Michael Moldaver
112:Court membership
42:
30:
21:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1077:
1076:
1063:
1058:
1045:
1043:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1019:
1017:
1007:
1006:
1002:
992:
990:
980:
979:
975:
965:
963:
954:
953:
946:
932:
931:
927:
917:
915:
906:
905:
901:
885:
884:
880:
864:
863:
859:
843:
842:
838:
822:
821:
817:
801:
800:
796:
786:
784:
773:
772:
768:
752:
751:
747:
743:SCC, para 50–53
742:
738:
733:
729:
724:
720:
715:
708:
698:
694:
677:
673:
663:
661:
656:
655:
651:
641:
639:
630:
629:
625:
615:
613:
604:
603:
599:
591:
582:
574:
570:
566:
534:
526:Court of Appeal
499:
419:
388:
353:
317:
260:
227:spinal stenosis
196:, ss 14, 241(b)
192:
143:Thomas Cromwell
127:Puisne Justices
55:
49:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1140:
1138:
1130:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1062:
1061:External links
1059:
1057:
1056:
1027:
1000:
987:Glove and Mail
973:
944:
925:
899:
878:
857:
836:
815:
794:
766:
745:
736:
727:
718:
706:
692:
685:2013-06-28 at
671:
649:
623:
597:
580:
567:
565:
562:
561:
560:
555:
550:
545:
540:
533:
530:
517:the same day.
498:
495:
418:
415:
387:
384:
352:
347:
316:
313:
259:
256:
198:
197:
185:
184:
180:
179:
172:
168:
167:
163:
162:
159:Clément Gascon
155:Richard Wagner
135:Rosalie Abella
128:
124:
123:
118:
114:
113:
109:
108:
100:
99:
95:
94:
93:Appeal allowed
91:
87:
86:
80:
76:
75:
72:
68:
67:
64:
58:
57:
51:
50:
43:
35:
34:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1139:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1082:
1073:
1069:
1066:Full text of
1065:
1064:
1060:
1053:
1042:
1038:
1031:
1028:
1015:
1011:
1004:
1001:
988:
984:
977:
974:
961:
957:
951:
949:
945:
940:
936:
929:
926:
913:
909:
903:
900:
895:
894:
893:National Post
889:
882:
879:
874:
873:
868:
861:
858:
853:
852:
851:National Post
847:
840:
837:
832:
831:
830:National Post
826:
819:
816:
811:
810:
809:National Post
805:
798:
795:
783:
782:
777:
770:
767:
762:
761:
756:
749:
746:
740:
737:
731:
728:
722:
719:
713:
711:
707:
703:
702:
696:
693:
690:, 3 SCR 519.
689:
688:
687:archive.today
684:
681:
675:
672:
659:
653:
650:
638:
634:
627:
624:
611:
607:
601:
598:
594:
589:
587:
585:
581:
577:
572:
569:
563:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
535:
531:
529:
527:
523:
518:
516:
511:
507:
506:
496:
494:
490:
487:
483:
481:
476:
474:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:Stockwell Day
439:
435:
434:
433:National Post
430:wrote in his
429:
424:
416:
414:
411:
407:
403:
402:
397:
393:
392:Criminal Code
385:
383:
381:
377:
372:
371:
366:
365:
364:stare decisis
360:
359:
351:
350:Stare decisis
348:
346:
344:
340:
336:
331:
330:Criminal Code
325:
320:
314:
312:
310:
306:
301:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:Criminal Code
283:
278:
276:
275:
269:
268:Criminal Code
265:
264:Criminal Code
257:
255:
251:
249:
247:
242:
241:
240:Criminal Code
236:
232:
231:Gloria Taylor
228:
224:
220:
219:
214:
210:
206:
205:
195:
194:Criminal Code
190:
186:
181:
178:
177:
173:
169:
166:Reasons given
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
125:
122:
119:
117:Chief Justice
115:
110:
106:
101:
96:
92:
88:
85:
81:
79:Prior history
77:
73:
69:
65:
63:
59:
52:
48:
47:
41:
36:
31:
19:
1070:decision at
1051:
1044:. Retrieved
1040:
1030:
1018:. Retrieved
1014:Toronto Star
1013:
1003:
991:. Retrieved
986:
976:
964:. Retrieved
959:
938:
928:
916:. Retrieved
911:
902:
891:
881:
870:
860:
849:
839:
828:
818:
807:
797:
785:. Retrieved
779:
769:
758:
748:
739:
730:
725:SCC, par. 47
721:
716:SCC, par. 44
704:, 2015 SCC 5
699:
695:
678:
674:
662:. Retrieved
652:
640:. Retrieved
636:
626:
614:. Retrieved
609:
600:
571:
519:
515:Royal assent
509:
505:Toronto Star
503:
500:
491:
488:
484:
477:
472:
470:
458:Conrad Black
453:
431:
428:Andrew Coyne
420:
399:
391:
389:
379:
375:
368:
362:
356:
354:
349:
338:
329:
327:
322:
318:
302:
300:(equality).
297:
285:
279:
272:
267:
263:
261:
252:
244:
238:
222:
216:
203:
202:
201:
193:
188:
183:Laws applied
174:
104:
44:
787:25 February
664:28 February
131:Louis LeBel
1081:Categories
993:January 2,
966:January 2,
918:January 2,
642:9 February
616:January 2,
564:References
406:section 92
290:sections 7
258:Background
71:Docket No.
66:2015 SCC 5
380:Rodriguez
376:Rodriguez
343:section 1
335:section 7
176:The Court
62:Citations
1046:June 18,
1041:Macleans
1020:June 18,
960:CTV News
760:CTV News
683:Archived
532:See also
408:powers.
74:S112688
339:Charter
337:of the
298:Charter
296:of the
223:Charter
105:Charter
98:Holding
510:Carter
454:Carter
229:, and
191:, s 7
90:Ruling
1072:LexUM
781:BCCLA
558:Death
522:refer
294:15(1)
1048:2016
1022:2016
995:2016
968:2016
920:2016
789:2015
666:2016
644:2015
618:2016
478:The
637:NPR
1083::
1050:.
1039:.
1012:.
985:.
958:.
947:^
937:.
910:.
890:.
869:.
848:.
827:.
806:.
778:.
757:.
709:^
635:.
608:.
583:^
468:.
456:,
382:.
345:.
221:("
157:,
153:,
149:,
145:,
141:,
137:,
133:,
1024:.
997:.
970:.
941:.
922:.
896:.
875:.
854:.
833:.
812:.
791:.
763:.
668:.
646:.
620:.
248:,
161:.
107:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
