109:, plaintiff Ross brought an action against a charitable trust which had been established for a home for fatherless boys, contending that he had been excluded from the home even though he was fatherless and otherwise qualified for the charitable benefits. By the time his case was determined, Ross was too old for admission, and the question was whether he was entitled to damages from the trust funds. The House of Lords held that he was not. In the
22:
136:
A blanket waiver from suit for charities did not exist anywhere at common law until it was adopted in
England in 1861. Moreover, the concept of immunity had no sooner crept into English law than it was decisively repudiated. By 1866, the dictum of
121:, pronounced that an award of damages out of a trust fund "would not be to apply it to those objects which the author of the fund had in view, but would be to divert it to a completely different purpose".
168:
Under the charitable immunity doctrine, it was still possible to sue employees or volunteers of charitable institutions, so the doctrine's existence encouraged other legal arguments, such as the "
82:. Between the 1940s and 1992, almost every state in the United States had abrogated or limited the charitable immunity doctrine. The doctrine has also been abandoned in Britain and Canada.
133:, 6 Cl. & Fin. 894 (1839), which decided, unremarkably, that highway trustees, under a public road act, were not liable for the negligence of independent contractors.
302:
184 D.L.R. (4th) 445, Ontario Court of Appeal, Court File No. C29290, Doherty, Abella and
Feldman JJ.A., Heard: April 14, 1999, Judgment rendered: April 10, 2000
43:
30:
398:
114:
207:
259:
Bradley C. Canon, Dean Jaros (Summer 1979). "The Impact of
Changes in Judicial Doctrine: The Abrogation of Charitable Immunity".
230:
125:
was not a tort claim and did not address the issue whether a charity is liable to those whom it has wrongfully injured.
169:
35:
95:
408:
71:
403:
162:
276:
158:
102:; it only protected segregated funds held in a recognized equitable trust for the organization.
297:
374:
215:
366:
268:
172:" argument that a surgeon is responsible for everything that happens in an operating room.
242:
231:"Liability of Not-for-profit organizations and Insurance Coverage for Related Liability"
194:"How the Push for Religious Accommodation Can Go Too Far: Two Important Recent Examples"
357:
Murphy EK (October 2001). ""Captain of the ship" doctrine continues to take on water".
110:
67:
370:
193:
392:
79:
378:
157:
The doctrine has especially been relevant, or discussed, in the context of
21:
280:
99:
91:
272:
75:
347:, 130 F.2d 810, 816-17 (1942) (discussing history of doctrine).
208:"Christian Brothers of Ireland in Canada - Charitable Immunity"
298:"Re Winding-up of the Christian Brothers of Ireland in Canada"
15:
129:repeated an earlier dictum from Lord Cottenham in
235:The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law
229:Jerold Oshinsky and Gheiza M. Dias (May 2002).
8:
292:
290:
187:
185:
316:Callopy v. Newark Eye & Ear Infirmary
90:The early form of charitable immunity in
46:of all important aspects of the article.
331:, 142 Eng Rep 769 (1861) (discussed in
254:
252:
181:
314:, 8 Eng Rep 1508 (1846) (discussed in
149:, LR 1 HL 93, 11 Eng Rep 1500 (1866).
42:Please consider expanding the lead to
7:
192:Marci Hamilton (November 29, 2007).
78:law. It originated in 19th-century
329:Holliday v. St. Leonard, Shoreditch
312:Feoffees of Heriot’s Hosp. V. Ross
14:
20:
34:may be too short to adequately
147:Mersey Docks Trustees v. Gibbs
44:provide an accessible overview
1:
399:Charity in the United Kingdom
371:10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61686-4
345:Georgetown College v. Hughes
141:(and by implication that of
425:
261:Law & Society Review
72:charitable organization
241:(2/3). Archived from
74:is not liable under
318:, 141 A.2d at 278).
170:captain of the ship
163:medical malpractice
145:) was overruled by
139:Duncan v. Findlater
131:Duncan v. Findlater
70:which holds that a
64:Charitable immunity
159:child sexual abuse
143:Heriot's Hospital
127:Heriot's Hospital
123:Heriot's Hospital
107:Heriot's Hospital
61:
60:
416:
383:
382:
354:
348:
342:
336:
325:
319:
309:
303:
301:
294:
285:
284:
256:
247:
246:
226:
220:
219:
214:. Archived from
204:
198:
197:
189:
94:did not provide
56:
53:
47:
24:
16:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
389:
388:
387:
386:
356:
355:
351:
343:
339:
326:
322:
310:
306:
296:
295:
288:
273:10.2307/3053152
258:
257:
250:
228:
227:
223:
206:
205:
201:
191:
190:
183:
178:
155:
88:
57:
51:
48:
41:
29:This article's
25:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
412:
411:
409:Legal immunity
406:
401:
391:
390:
385:
384:
349:
337:
320:
304:
286:
267:(4): 969–986.
248:
245:on 2008-05-15.
221:
218:on 2006-06-25.
199:
180:
179:
177:
174:
154:
151:
115:Lord Cottenham
111:House of Lords
87:
84:
68:legal doctrine
59:
58:
38:the key points
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
410:
407:
405:
402:
400:
397:
396:
394:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
353:
350:
346:
341:
338:
334:
330:
324:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
299:
293:
291:
287:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
255:
253:
249:
244:
240:
236:
232:
225:
222:
217:
213:
209:
203:
200:
195:
188:
186:
182:
175:
173:
171:
166:
164:
160:
152:
150:
148:
144:
140:
134:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
101:
97:
93:
85:
83:
81:
80:Great Britain
77:
73:
69:
65:
55:
52:December 2021
45:
39:
37:
32:
27:
23:
18:
17:
365:(4): 525–8.
362:
358:
352:
344:
340:
332:
328:
323:
315:
311:
307:
264:
260:
243:the original
238:
234:
224:
216:the original
211:
202:
167:
156:
146:
142:
138:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
106:
104:
89:
63:
62:
49:
33:
31:lead section
404:Charity law
393:Categories
212:carters.ca
176:References
153:Variations
119:in dictum
36:summarize
379:11665386
96:immunity
333:Callopy
281:3053152
92:England
86:History
377:
359:AORN J
279:
327:See,
277:JSTOR
98:from
66:is a
375:PMID
161:and
100:suit
76:tort
367:doi
269:doi
105:In
395::
373:.
363:74
361:.
335:).
289:^
275:.
265:13
263:.
251:^
237:.
233:.
210:.
184:^
165:.
117:,
113:,
381:.
369::
300:.
283:.
271::
239:4
196:.
54:)
50:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
