322:
419:
causation, this is a subjective test. Causation is a legal conclusion. The reason why a person acted as he did is a question of fact... Employers, acting honestly and reasonably, ought to be able to take steps to preserve their position in pending discrimination proceedings without laying themselves open to a charge of victimisation. This accords with the spirit and purpose of the Act.’ So this was less favourable treatment, compared to someone who had not complained, but not ‘by reason that’ Khan had complained.
188:
74:
33:
418:
Lord
Nicholls remarked that it was not a standard and sometimes ‘slippery’ causation analysis exercise here. ‘The phrases ‘on racial grounds’ and ‘by reason that’ denote a different exercise: why did the alleged discriminator act as he did? What, consciously or unconsciously, was his reason? Unlike
387:
Sergeant Raham Noor Khan was not hired for another job, after he had left the first with a race discrimination claim pending. The reason for not hiring was apparently his communication and leadership skills. No reference was given by the force which was ‘unable to comment any further for fear of
422:
Lord
Hoffmann, ‘They are not only employer and employee but also adversaries in litigation. The existence of that adversarial relationship may reasonably cause the employer to behave in a way which treats the employee less favourably than someone who had not commenced such proceedings.’
209:
46:
52:
379:
case concerning the test for victimisation and the legitimate steps an employer can take after dismissed a person who is bringing a discrimination claim against them.
452:
260:
150:
232:
122:
239:
129:
606:
596:
246:
136:
98:
of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be
321:
228:
118:
400:
519:
445:
297:
279:
169:
60:
95:
533:
253:
213:
143:
415:
overturned the victimisation claim, holding the police had a legitimate interest in withholding the reference from Mr Khan.
479:
601:
91:
507:
493:
438:
107:
198:
567:
551:
396:
217:
202:
84:
17:
103:
388:
prejudicing his own case before the tribunal’. Recent staff appraisal records were refused as well.
99:
392:
403:
all upheld the victimisation claim, though the
Tribunal dismissed the race discrimination claim.
468:
412:
590:
562:
547:
376:
537:
523:
497:
483:
372:
187:
430:
90:
Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing
434:
181:
67:
26:
355:
347:
339:
331:
314:
229:"Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan"
119:"Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan"
369:Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan
315:Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan
446:
8:
216:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
61:Learn how and when to remove these messages
453:
439:
431:
320:
311:
18:Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police v Khan
298:Learn how and when to remove this message
280:Learn how and when to remove this message
170:Learn how and when to remove this message
480:Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
7:
214:adding citations to reliable sources
520:Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary
326:West Yorkshire Police Headquarters.
25:
42:This article has multiple issues.
186:
72:
31:
607:2001 in United Kingdom case law
83:may not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s
50:or discuss these issues on the
597:United Kingdom labour case law
1:
361:Discrimination, victimisation
508:Waters v Metropolitan Police
494:West Yorkshire Police v Khan
85:general notability guideline
623:
568:UK employment equality law
552:UK employment equality law
534:St Helen’s BC v Derbyshire
92:reliable secondary sources
81:The topic of this article
544:
530:
516:
504:
490:
476:
466:
360:
319:
602:House of Lords cases
210:improve this article
461:Victimisation cases
393:Employment Tribunal
351:UKHL 48, ICR 1065
87:
558:
557:
469:Equality Act 2010
365:
364:
308:
307:
300:
290:
289:
282:
264:
180:
179:
172:
154:
82:
65:
16:(Redirected from
614:
455:
448:
441:
432:
324:
312:
303:
296:
285:
278:
274:
271:
265:
263:
222:
190:
182:
175:
168:
164:
161:
155:
153:
112:
76:
75:
68:
57:
35:
34:
27:
21:
622:
621:
617:
616:
615:
613:
612:
611:
587:
586:
581:
576:
559:
554:
540:
526:
512:
500:
486:
472:
462:
459:
429:
409:
401:Court of Appeal
385:
343:11 October 2001
327:
304:
293:
292:
291:
286:
275:
269:
266:
223:
221:
207:
191:
176:
165:
159:
156:
113:
111:
89:
77:
73:
36:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
620:
618:
610:
609:
604:
599:
589:
588:
585:
584:
580:
577:
575:
572:
571:
570:
565:
556:
555:
545:
542:
541:
531:
528:
527:
517:
514:
513:
505:
502:
501:
491:
488:
487:
477:
474:
473:
467:
464:
463:
460:
458:
457:
450:
443:
435:
428:
425:
413:House of Lords
408:
405:
384:
381:
363:
362:
358:
357:
353:
352:
349:
345:
344:
341:
337:
336:
335:House of Lords
333:
329:
328:
325:
317:
316:
306:
305:
288:
287:
194:
192:
185:
178:
177:
80:
78:
71:
66:
40:
39:
37:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
619:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
594:
592:
583:
582:
578:
573:
569:
566:
564:
563:UK labour law
561:
560:
553:
549:
543:
539:
536:
535:
529:
525:
522:
521:
515:
510:
509:
503:
499:
496:
495:
489:
485:
482:
481:
475:
470:
465:
456:
451:
449:
444:
442:
437:
436:
433:
426:
424:
420:
416:
414:
406:
404:
402:
398:
394:
389:
382:
380:
378:
377:UK labour law
374:
371:
370:
359:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
323:
318:
313:
310:
302:
299:
284:
281:
273:
262:
259:
255:
252:
248:
245:
241:
238:
234:
231: –
230:
226:
225:Find sources:
219:
215:
211:
205:
204:
200:
195:This article
193:
189:
184:
183:
174:
171:
163:
152:
149:
145:
142:
138:
135:
131:
128:
124:
121: –
120:
116:
115:Find sources:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
86:
79:
70:
69:
64:
62:
55:
54:
49:
48:
43:
38:
29:
28:
19:
532:
518:
506:
492:
478:
421:
417:
410:
390:
386:
368:
367:
366:
309:
294:
276:
267:
257:
250:
243:
236:
224:
208:Please help
196:
166:
157:
147:
140:
133:
126:
114:
58:
51:
45:
44:Please help
41:
96:independent
591:Categories
579:References
240:newspapers
130:newspapers
104:redirected
47:improve it
548:UK labour
270:July 2024
197:does not
160:July 2024
94:that are
53:talk page
511:ICR 1073
427:See also
407:Judgment
356:Keywords
348:Citation
538:UKHL 16
524:UKHL 11
498:UKHL 48
484:UKHL 36
373:UKHL 48
340:Decided
254:scholar
218:removed
203:sources
144:scholar
108:deleted
256:
249:
242:
235:
227:
146:
139:
132:
125:
117:
100:merged
574:Notes
383:Facts
375:is a
332:Court
261:JSTOR
247:books
151:JSTOR
137:books
106:, or
550:and
546:See
471:s 27
411:The
399:and
391:The
233:news
201:any
199:cite
123:news
397:EAT
212:by
593::
395:,
102:,
56:.
454:e
447:t
440:v
301:)
295:(
283:)
277:(
272:)
268:(
258:·
251:·
244:·
237:·
220:.
206:.
173:)
167:(
162:)
158:(
148:·
141:·
134:·
127:·
110:.
88:.
63:)
59:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
