167:
55:
464:(11 September 2019) (Scotland). "This is not because of the terms of the Claim of Right 1689 or of any speciality of Scots constitutional law, it follows from the application of the common law, informed by applying 'the principles of democracy and the rule of law' (Moohan v Lord Advocate 2015 SC (UKSC) 1, Lord Hodge at para ). The terms of the Claim of Right are not breached simply because Parliament does not sit for a month or so. Parliament has, throughout the year, been allowed to sit."
228:
Later that month, the
Convention adopted the Claim of Right and the Article of Grievances, enumerating what they saw as the contemporary requirements of Scottish constitutional law. It also declared that, because of his actions in violation of these laws, James had forfeited the Scottish throne.
297:
Outer House judge, Lord
Doherty found the claim was non-justiciable, and that if it was justiciable then there was no breach of the Claim of Right. The Inner House allowed the appeal, ruling the issue justiciable and the prorogation unlawful, since its true purpose was to "stymie Parliamentary
281:
The effect of the Claim of Right was to "bolster the position of parliament within the
Scottish constitution at the expense of the royal prerogative". It was affirmed by an Act of the Scottish Parliament of 1703 (Act Ratifieing the turning of the Meeting of the Estates in the year 1689, into a
271:
And they (the People of
Scotland) Doe Claim Demand and insist upon all and sundry the premisses as ther undoubted right and liberties And that no Declarationes Doeings or proceedings to the "PREDJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" in any of the said premisses ought in any wayes to be drawne hereafter in
232:
The
Convention proceeded to offer the crown on the basis of these documents to William and Mary, who accepted it on 11 May 1689, and were proclaimed King and Queen of the Scots as William II and Mary II, though with subsequent controversy over whether the Claim of Right articles against
205:, the Scots found themselves facing a more difficult constitutional problem. As James had not been present in Scotland during the crisis and had not fled from Scottish territory in December, it would be highly dubious to claim that he had
254:
That it is the right and priviledge of the subjects to protest for remeed of law to the King and
Parliament against Sentences pronounced by the lords of Sessione Provydeing the samen Do not stop Execution of these
265:
That for redress of all grievances and for the amending strenthening and preserving of the lawes
Parliaments ought to be frequently called and allowed to sit and the freedom of speech and debate secured to the
272:
Consequence or
Example But that all forefaultors fynes loss of offices Imprisonments Banishments pursuits persecutiones tortures and rigorous Executiones be Considered and the pairties læsed be redressed
509:
579:
502:
166:
625:
221:
met to consider letters received on 16 March 1689 from the two contenders for the Crown. On 4 April they voted to remove James VII from office, drawing on
190:
and
Ireland as James II, attempted to resist the invasion. He then sent representatives to negotiate, and he finally fled England on 23 December 1688.
495:
72:
The
Declaration of the Estates of the Kingdom of Scotland containing the Claim of Right and the offer of the Croune to the King and Queen of England.
635:
630:
323:
260:
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King and that all Imprisonments and prosecutiones for such petitioning are Contrary to law
77:
143:
290:
376:
151:
589:
518:
526:
31:
574:
640:
218:
194:
620:
549:
131:
331:
564:
249:
That all Proclamationes asserting ane ABSOLUTE POWER to Cass annull and Dissable lawes are Contrair to Law
179:
147:
59:
539:
67:
615:
544:
534:
554:
198:
183:
175:
92:
477:
461:
446:
569:
481:
283:
202:
139:
117:
368:
362:
298:
scrutiny of government action". However, it said this was not a consequence of peculiarities of
197:
in England declared that James, as King of England, had abdicated the government, and issued an
392:
327:
416:
372:
113:
289:
In 2019, the Act was cited by MPs seeking a court ruling that Prime Minister Boris Johnson's
294:
234:
584:
222:
187:
282:
Parliament c. 3). The Act was retained by the Parliament of the United Kingdom after the
17:
609:
330:. Due to the repeal of those provisions it is now authorised by section 19(2) of the
594:
487:
182:
invaded England, landing with his Dutch Army in England on 5 November 1688. King
319:
480:
as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from
116:
as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from
344:
299:
155:
106:
150:(or Three Estates), in April 1689. It is one of the key documents of
165:
201:
on 13 February 1689 offering the Crown of England to William and
491:
429:
Revolution: The Great Crisis of the British Monarchy 1685–1720
459:
Joanna Cherry QC MP and Others v The Advocate General
30:"Claim of Right" redirects here. For other uses, see
525:
225:'s argument on the contractual nature of monarchy.
112:
105:
98:
86:
76:
66:
444:Joanna Cherry QC MP and Others for Judicial Review
580:His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936
269:
263:
258:
252:
247:
503:
8:
42:
510:
496:
488:
347:. 8 December 2016 – via www.bbc.com.
170:1989 coin commemorating the Claim of Right
41:
356:
354:
237:were fully accepted by the new monarchy.
324:Statute Law Revision (Scotland) Act 1964
291:September 2019 prorogation of Parliament
311:
449:(4 September 2019) (Scotland). Para 30
107:Text of statute as originally enacted
7:
439:
437:
478:Text of the Claim of Right Act 1689
626:Acts of the Parliament of Scotland
219:Convention of the Scottish Estates
25:
318:The citation of this Act by this
152:United Kingdom constitutional law
590:Succession to the Crown Act 2013
519:Succession to the British throne
53:
636:Succession to the British crown
631:Constitutional laws of Scotland
245:The Act includes the passages:
114:Text of the Claim of Right 1689
32:Claim of Right (disambiguation)
27:Kingdom of Scotland legislation
575:Accession Declaration Act 1910
1:
431:Allen Lane (2006) pp. 401–402
156:Scottish constitutional law
100:Status: Current legislation
657:
39:United Kingdom legislation
29:
417:Wikisource:Claim of Right
393:"Claim of Right Act 1689"
144:Convention of the Estates
52:
47:
550:Coronation Oath Act 1688
88:Territorial extent
18:Claim of Rights Act 1689
364:Scotland: A New History
361:Lynch, Michael (1992).
332:Interpretation Act 1978
302:or the Claim of Right.
146:, a sister body to the
565:Act of Settlement 1701
462:[2019] CSIH 49
447:[2019 CSOH 70]
322:was authorised by the
274:
268:
262:
257:
251:
199:English Bill of Rights
171:
148:Parliament of Scotland
135:
60:Parliament of Scotland
241:Provisions of the Act
195:Convention Parliament
184:James VII of Scotland
169:
585:Perth Agreement 2011
641:Glorious Revolution
560:Claim of Right 1689
555:Bill of Rights 1689
545:Succession Act 1543
540:Succession Act 1536
535:Succession Act 1533
367:. Pimlico. p.
176:Glorious Revolution
93:Kingdom of Scotland
44:
482:legislation.gov.uk
397:legislation.gov.uk
293:was unlawful. The
284:Acts of Union 1707
209:the Scots throne.
172:
118:legislation.gov.uk
603:
602:
570:Act of Union 1706
180:William of Orange
124:
123:
48:Act of Parliament
16:(Redirected from
648:
621:1689 in Scotland
512:
505:
498:
489:
465:
456:
450:
441:
432:
425:
419:
414:
408:
407:
405:
403:
389:
383:
382:
358:
349:
348:
341:
335:
326:, section 2 and
316:
295:Court of Session
136:Tagradh na Còire
89:
57:
56:
45:
21:
656:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
646:
645:
606:
605:
604:
599:
521:
516:
474:
469:
468:
457:
453:
442:
435:
426:
422:
415:
411:
401:
399:
391:
390:
386:
379:
360:
359:
352:
343:
342:
338:
317:
313:
308:
279:
243:
223:George Buchanan
215:
188:King of England
186:, who was also
164:
132:Scottish Gaelic
101:
87:
62:
54:
40:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
654:
652:
644:
643:
638:
633:
628:
623:
618:
608:
607:
601:
600:
598:
597:
592:
587:
582:
577:
572:
567:
562:
557:
552:
547:
542:
537:
531:
529:
523:
522:
517:
515:
514:
507:
500:
492:
486:
485:
473:
472:External links
470:
467:
466:
451:
433:
420:
409:
384:
377:
350:
345:"Sean agus ùr"
336:
310:
309:
307:
304:
278:
275:
242:
239:
214:
211:
208:
163:
160:
142:passed by the
128:Claim of Right
122:
121:
110:
109:
103:
102:
99:
96:
95:
90:
84:
83:
80:
74:
73:
70:
64:
63:
58:
50:
49:
43:Claim of Right
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
653:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
614:
613:
611:
596:
593:
591:
588:
586:
583:
581:
578:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
532:
530:
528:
524:
520:
513:
508:
506:
501:
499:
494:
493:
490:
483:
479:
476:
475:
471:
463:
460:
455:
452:
448:
445:
440:
438:
434:
430:
424:
421:
418:
413:
410:
398:
394:
388:
385:
380:
378:0-7126-9893-0
374:
370:
366:
365:
357:
355:
351:
346:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
315:
312:
305:
303:
301:
296:
292:
287:
285:
276:
273:
267:
261:
256:
250:
246:
240:
238:
236:
230:
226:
224:
220:
217:Therefore, a
212:
210:
206:
204:
200:
196:
191:
189:
185:
181:
177:
168:
161:
159:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
119:
115:
111:
108:
104:
97:
94:
91:
85:
81:
79:
75:
71:
69:
65:
61:
51:
46:
37:
33:
19:
595:Regency Acts
559:
458:
454:
443:
428:
427:Harris, Tim
423:
412:
400:. Retrieved
396:
387:
363:
339:
314:
288:
280:
277:Significance
270:
264:
259:
253:
248:
244:
231:
227:
216:
192:
173:
127:
125:
36:
616:1689 in law
527:Legislation
320:short title
193:Whilst the
610:Categories
402:19 October
328:Schedule 2
306:References
235:Episcopacy
162:Background
82:1689 c. 28
68:Long title
300:Scots law
255:sentences
207:abdicated
138:) is an
130:(c. 28;
78:Citation
266:members
213:Process
174:In the
375:
404:2022
373:ISBN
203:Mary
154:and
126:The
369:302
140:Act
612::
436:^
395:.
371:.
353:^
286:.
178:,
158:.
134::
511:e
504:t
497:v
484:.
406:.
381:.
334:.
120:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
