Knowledge (XXG)

Claimants union

Source 📝

147:
broadening the decision-making process. The example we consider is the Montreal Participative Budget ( PB). We focus on the impact of decentralization, more specifically on the form this took as the Montreal PB was being elaborated. We examine how much decentralization circumscribes the PB process. The Montreal Participative Budget provides an illustration of the emergence of a participative level in a political context that is, on the whole, hostile to participatory decision making. We suggest that the PB in this context benefits from a new window of opportunity. The chosen example has a dual significance: it underlines the role of temporal contingencies and scales of the process of decentralization in the participative structures at the local level, and it enables us to gain a better grasp of the problem of institutional architectures in implementing participatory democracy by emphasizing the political and social realities underlying new loci for decision making.
88:. This perspective particularly affected the growing radical students movement, who were to provide an important impetus to the emergence of the claimants unions. Hilary Rose argues that in these circumstances, students who wished to engage with working class activism looked for new emergent forms rather than linking with the Labour Party whose credentials as being a voice for the working class were being increasingly questioned. While this often meant they were drawn to 116:
the poor like CPAG. Likewise an individual advisor-client relationship was rejected in favour of discussing each case in the whole meeting, which provided an important organisational lesson: by working together people could do things for themselves. This approach was also reflected in the article
146:
The intent of this article is to reflect on the notion of empowered participatory governance in order to gain a better understanding of the institutional contexts and parameters that encourage a more participative democracy, and thereby bring to light the political mechanisms that contribute to
59:
Cross party support led to the introduction of a welfare state in the UK by the late 1940s. Whilst this led to a somewhat self-congratulatory viewpoint that poverty had been largely eliminated, this perspective was increasingly being criticised by the 1950s. The research of
247:
Patsias, Caroline; Latendresse, Anne; Bherer, Laurence (November 2013). "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of 'Empowered Participatory Governance': The Montreal participatory budget".
72:, published in 1965, argued that poverty had increased from 1953 to 1960 and that a significant factor in this was a gap between formal entitlement to benefits and the amount people actually claimed. Abel-Smith and Townsend founded the 92:, the perceived failings of the welfare state encouraged such students to get involved with claimants unions. Thus it was five working-class students in Birmingham who founded the first claimants union in 41:. A claimant, in the context of insurance, is a policyholder who files a claim or formal request for payment from their insurer to cover a specific loss. 281: 126: 121:
in 1969. Despite starting from an original format based on generic trade union structures, the BCU soon developed an approach much more based on
108:, the Birmingham Claimants Union (BCU) started to develop their own approach to organising around welfare rights: they were more an organisation 85: 38: 118: 125:. They challenged the way the Supplementary benefit appeal tribunals were run, arguing that with staff appointed from within the 81: 65: 73: 286: 122: 130: 77: 80:, while Townsend was to play a critical and oppositional role with the second director of the CPAG, 192: 89: 257: 61: 30: 167: 34: 275: 261: 33:
to make successful claims for that benefit. They were particularly prevalent in the
29:
organisation based on self-help and mutual support to enable those entitled to
26: 105: 93: 232:
Rose, Hilary (1973). "Up Against the Welfare State: Claimants Unions".
76:(CPAG). However Abel-Smith was to work closely with the 193:"1945-51: Labour and the creation of the welfare state" 250:
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
117:"Democracy for the Poorest", written for the 8: 129:, the very organisation which implemented 133:, the tribunals were hardly independent. 127:Department of Health and Social Security 159: 227: 225: 223: 221: 219: 217: 215: 213: 112:the poor rather than an organisation 7: 84:, particularly in the run up to the 37:following the establishment of the 18:Type of United Kingdom organisation 14: 282:Welfare and service organizations 262:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01171.x 45:Claimants unions by jurisdiction 119:Institute for Workers' Control 1: 303: 100:Birmingham Claimants Union 74:Child Poverty Action Group 70:The Poor and the Poorest 142:Participatory democracy 123:participatory democracy 131:Supplementary Benefit 86:1966 general election 78:Wilson administration 39:British welfare state 234:Socialist Register 90:community politics 96:in January 1969. 294: 287:Social movements 266: 265: 256:(6): 2214–2230. 244: 238: 237: 229: 208: 207: 205: 203: 188: 182: 181: 179: 178: 164: 62:Brian Abel-Smith 31:welfare benefits 302: 301: 297: 296: 295: 293: 292: 291: 272: 271: 270: 269: 246: 245: 241: 231: 230: 211: 201: 199: 190: 189: 185: 176: 174: 172:Insuranceopedia 166: 165: 161: 156: 150: 144: 139: 102: 57: 52: 47: 23:claimants union 19: 12: 11: 5: 300: 298: 290: 289: 284: 274: 273: 268: 267: 239: 209: 191:Brown, Derek. 183: 158: 157: 155: 152: 143: 140: 138: 137:Current status 135: 104:Starting from 101: 98: 66:Peter Townsend 56: 53: 51: 50:United Kingdom 48: 46: 43: 35:United Kingdom 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 299: 288: 285: 283: 280: 279: 277: 263: 259: 255: 251: 243: 240: 235: 228: 226: 224: 222: 220: 218: 216: 214: 210: 198: 194: 187: 184: 173: 169: 163: 160: 153: 151: 148: 141: 136: 134: 132: 128: 124: 120: 115: 111: 107: 99: 97: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 54: 49: 44: 42: 40: 36: 32: 28: 24: 16: 253: 249: 242: 233: 200:. Retrieved 197:The Guardian 196: 186: 175:. Retrieved 171: 162: 149: 145: 113: 109: 103: 69: 58: 22: 20: 15: 82:Frank Field 276:Categories 177:2024-02-14 168:"Claimant" 154:References 27:grassroots 106:Sparkhill 94:Sparkhill 202:24 March 55:Origins 25:is a 204:2016 64:and 258:doi 114:for 278:: 254:37 252:. 212:^ 195:. 170:. 110:of 68:, 21:A 264:. 260:: 236:. 206:. 180:.

Index

grassroots
welfare benefits
United Kingdom
British welfare state
Brian Abel-Smith
Peter Townsend
Child Poverty Action Group
Wilson administration
Frank Field
1966 general election
community politics
Sparkhill
Sparkhill
Institute for Workers' Control
participatory democracy
Department of Health and Social Security
Supplementary Benefit
"Claimant"
"1945-51: Labour and the creation of the welfare state"








doi
10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01171.x
Categories

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.