109:, the protocol is carefully designed to safeguard the health of the participants as well as answer specific research questions. A protocol describes what types of people may participate in the trial; the schedule of tests, procedures, medications, and dosages; and the length of the study. While in a clinical trial, participants following a protocol are seen regularly by research staff to monitor their health and to determine the safety and effectiveness of their treatment. Since 1996, clinical trials conducted are widely expected to conform to and report the information called for in the
98:(SOP) governing general practices required by the laboratory. A protocol may also reference applicable laws and regulations that are applicable to the procedures described. Formal protocols typically require approval by one or more individuals—including for example a laboratory directory, study director, and/or independent ethics committee—before they are implemented for general use. Clearly defined protocols are also required by research funded by the
58:. In addition to detailed procedures, equipment, and instruments, protocols will also contain study objectives, reasoning for experimental design, reasoning for chosen sample sizes, safety precautions, and how results were calculated and reported, including statistical analysis and any rules for predefining and documenting excluded data to avoid bias.
134:: Procedural information may include not only safety procedures but also procedures for avoiding contamination, calibration of equipment, equipment testing, documentation, and all other relevant issues. These procedural protocols can be used by skeptics to invalidate any claimed results if flaws are found.
140:: Equipment testing and documentation includes all necessary specifications, calibrations, operating ranges, etc. Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, and other factors can often have effects on results. Documenting these factors should be a part of any good procedure.
124:: Safety precautions are a valuable addition to a protocol, and can range from requiring goggles to provisions for containment of microbes, environmental hazards, toxic substances, and volatile solvents. Procedural contingencies in the event of an accident may be included in a protocol or in a referenced
231:
An experimenter may have latitude defining procedures for blinding and controls but may be required to justify those choices if the results are published or submitted to a regulatory agency. When it is known during the experiment which data was negative there are often reasons to rationalize why that
215:
A protocol may require blinding to avoid bias. A blind can be imposed on any participant of an experiment, including subjects, researchers, technicians, data analysts, and evaluators. In some cases, while blinding would be useful, it is impossible or unethical. A good clinical protocol ensures that
85:
Various fields of science, such as environmental science and clinical research, require the coordinated, standardized work of many participants. Additionally, any associated laboratory testing and experiment must be done in a way that is both ethically sound and results can be replicated by others
223:
if they deduce or otherwise obtain information that has been masked to them. Unblinding that occurs before the conclusion of a study is a source of experimental error, as the bias that was eliminated by blinding is re-introduced. Unblinding is common in blind experiments, and must be measured and
76:
Finally, in the field of social science, a protocol may also refer to a "descriptive record" of observed events or a "sequence of behavior" of one or more organisms, recorded during or immediately after an activity (e.g., how an infant reacts to certain stimuli or how gorillas behave in natural
146:: A protocol may specify reporting requirements. Reporting requirements would include all elements of the experiments design and protocols and any environmental factors or mechanical limitations that might affect the validity of the results.
152:: Protocols for methods that produce numerical results generally include detailed formulas for calculation of results. A formula may also be included for preparation of reagents and other solutions required for the work. Methods of
113:
Statement, which provides a framework for designing and reporting protocols. Though tailored to health and medicine, ideas in the CONSORT statement are broadly applicable to other fields where experimental research is used.
206:
Best practice recommends publishing the protocol of the review before initiating it to reduce the risk of unplanned research duplication and to enable transparency, and consistency between methodology and protocol.
77:
habitat) to better identify "consistent patterns and cause-effect relationships." These protocols may take the form of hand-written journals or electronically documented media, including video and audio capture.
54:
of results by others in the same laboratory or by other laboratories. Additionally, and by extension, protocols have the advantage of facilitating the assessment of experimental results through
1029:
Bello, Segun; Moustgaard, Helene; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn (October 2014). "The risk of unblinding was infrequently and incompletely reported in 300 randomized clinical trial publications".
86:
using the same methods and equipment. As such, rigorous and vetted testing and experimental protocols are required. In fact, such predefined protocols are an essential component of
174:
used is representative. For instance political polls are best when restricted to likely voters and this is one of the reasons why web polls cannot be considered scientific. The
178:
is another important concept and can lead to biased data simply due to an unlikely event. A sample size of 10, i.e., polling 10 people, will seldom give valid polling results.
890:
PRISMA-P Group; Moher, David; Shamseer, Larissa; Clarke, Mike; Ghersi, Davina; Liberati, Alessandro; Petticrew, Mark; Shekelle, Paul; Stewart, Lesley A (1 January 2015).
166:
is common to all measurements. These errors can be absolute errors from limitations of the equipment or propagation errors from approximate numbers used in calculations.
61:
Similarly, a protocol may refer to the procedural methods of health organizations, commercial laboratories, manufacturing plants, etc. to ensure their activities (e.g.,
225:
110:
766:. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). 9 November 2016. pp. 34–37
316:
974:
668:
461:
1078:
631:
597:
563:
427:
388:
170:
is the most common and sometimes the hardest bias to quantify. Statisticians often go to great lengths to ensure that the
99:
66:
125:
95:
43:
311:
500:
1093:
522:
87:
70:
287:
242:
1083:
799:
NCCIH requires that study investigators submit a final protocol document for all funded clinical projects.
346:
228:
recommend that all studies assess and report unblinding. In practice, very few studies assess unblinding.
91:
950:
692:
50:. Protocols are written whenever it is desirable to standardize a laboratory method to ensure successful
252:
247:
892:"Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement"
731:
73:
gears at a facility) are consistent to a specific standard, encouraging safe use and accurate results.
301:
292:
321:
282:
171:
163:
94:(GCP) regulations. Protocols written for use by a specific laboratory may incorporate or reference
756:
341:
336:
179:
1088:
1054:
1046:
1006:
970:
931:
913:
872:
664:
627:
593:
587:
559:
457:
451:
423:
384:
277:
267:
691:
UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special
Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (2001).
658:
621:
453:
Ethics and
Experiments: Problems and Solutions for Social Scientists and Policy Professionals
417:
378:
1038:
962:
921:
903:
862:
852:
553:
356:
31:
351:
297:
272:
51:
811:
162:: Many protocols include provisions for avoiding bias in the interpretation of results.
926:
891:
867:
840:
478:
331:
191:
106:
35:
841:"Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording"
1072:
199:
195:
1042:
306:
857:
732:"Handbook for good clinical research practice (GCP): Guidance for implementation"
17:
757:"Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2)"
326:
232:
data shouldn't be included. Positive data are rarely rationalized the same way.
187:
175:
167:
55:
998:
966:
262:
220:
216:
blinding is as effective as possible within ethical and practical constrains.
153:
62:
47:
1050:
917:
1058:
1010:
935:
876:
908:
785:
National center for
Complementary and Integrative Health (24 July 2018).
183:
786:
380:
Design and
Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design
257:
198:
often require the blinding of patients and researchers as well as a
27:
Procedural method for the design and implementation of an experiment
652:
650:
186:
are concepts used to quantify the likely relevance of a given
839:
Holman, L.; Head, M.L.; Lanfear, R.; Jennions, M.D. (2015).
660:
Consumer
Behaviour: Perspectives, Findings and Explanations
623:
Metatheory in Social
Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities
219:
During the course of an experiment, a participant becomes
547:
545:
543:
419:
592:. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors. p. 164.
501:"Recommended practices for calibration laboratories"
411:
409:
407:
156:
may be included to guide interpretation of the data.
834:
832:
702:. World Health Organization. pp. 16–18, 29–33
558:. Educational Technology Publications. p. 3.
383:. Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons. p. 11.
69:at a calibration laboratory, and manufacturing of
725:
723:
721:
719:
717:
1005:, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing,
626:. University of Chicago Press. pp. 61–62.
693:"Chapter 2: Good Laboratory Practice Training"
499:National Research Council Canada (June 2003).
8:
686:
684:
682:
680:
997:David, Sharoon; Khandhar, Paras B. (2021),
477:American Society for Microbiology (2016).
925:
907:
866:
856:
700:Handbook: Good laboratory practice (GLP)
377:Hinkelmann, K.; Kempthorne, O. (1994).
369:
46:in the design and implementation of an
523:"Automotive Protocols & Standards"
663:. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 71–2.
7:
317:Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism
730:World Health Organization (2005).
25:
787:"NCCIH Clinical Research Toolbox"
589:Dictionary of the Social Sciences
1031:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
959:Encyclopedia of Research Design
1043:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.007
117:Protocols will often address:
42:is most commonly a predefined
1:
422:. CRC Press. pp. 12–13.
100:National Institutes of Health
96:standard operating procedures
81:Experiment and study protocol
67:certified reference materials
858:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002190
456:. Routledge. p. PT382.
949:Salkind, N.J., ed. (2010).
312:Randomized controlled trial
150:calculations and statistics
1110:
967:10.4135/9781412961288.n471
657:O'Shaughnessy, J. (2012).
65:at a hospital, testing of
552:Thiagarajan, S. (1980).
88:Good Laboratory Practice
288:Paradigm (experimental)
243:Adaptive clinical trial
586:Reading, H.F. (1996).
521:Nash, T. (July 2005).
479:"Laboratory Protocols"
450:Desposato, S. (2015).
347:Statistical population
92:Good Clinical Practice
1079:Design of experiments
909:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
737:. WHO. pp. 27–34
416:Selwyn, M.R. (1996).
253:Design of experiments
248:Blocking (statistics)
999:"Double-Blind Study"
951:"Triple-Blind Study"
620:Fiske, D.W. (1986).
302:Nucleic acid methods
293:Propagation of error
226:Reporting guidelines
154:statistical analysis
322:Sample (statistics)
283:Observational error
164:Approximation error
955:Trible-Blind Study
896:Systematic Reviews
342:Standard deviation
337:Scientific control
180:Standard deviation
1094:Scientific method
1037:(10): 1059–1069.
555:Protocol Packages
278:Medical guideline
268:Estimation theory
211:Blinded protocols
44:procedural method
18:Clinical protocol
16:(Redirected from
1101:
1063:
1062:
1026:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
994:
988:
987:
985:
983:
946:
940:
939:
929:
911:
887:
881:
880:
870:
860:
836:
827:
826:
824:
822:
808:
802:
801:
796:
794:
782:
776:
775:
773:
771:
761:
753:
747:
746:
744:
742:
736:
727:
712:
711:
709:
707:
697:
688:
675:
674:
654:
645:
644:
642:
640:
617:
611:
610:
608:
606:
583:
577:
576:
574:
572:
549:
538:
537:
535:
533:
518:
512:
511:
509:
507:
496:
490:
489:
487:
485:
474:
468:
467:
447:
441:
440:
438:
436:
413:
402:
401:
399:
397:
374:
357:Systematic error
21:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1015:
1013:
996:
995:
991:
981:
979:
977:
948:
947:
943:
889:
888:
884:
851:(7): e1002190.
838:
837:
830:
820:
818:
810:
809:
805:
792:
790:
784:
783:
779:
769:
767:
759:
755:
754:
750:
740:
738:
734:
729:
728:
715:
705:
703:
695:
690:
689:
678:
671:
656:
655:
648:
638:
636:
634:
619:
618:
614:
604:
602:
600:
585:
584:
580:
570:
568:
566:
551:
550:
541:
531:
529:
520:
519:
515:
505:
503:
498:
497:
493:
483:
481:
476:
475:
471:
464:
449:
448:
444:
434:
432:
430:
415:
414:
405:
395:
393:
391:
376:
375:
371:
366:
361:
352:Survey sampling
298:Protein methods
273:Margin of error
238:
213:
83:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1107:
1105:
1097:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1071:
1070:
1065:
1064:
1021:
989:
975:
941:
882:
828:
803:
777:
748:
713:
676:
669:
646:
632:
612:
598:
578:
564:
539:
513:
491:
469:
462:
442:
428:
403:
389:
368:
367:
365:
362:
360:
359:
354:
349:
344:
339:
334:
332:Sampling error
329:
324:
319:
314:
309:
304:
295:
290:
285:
280:
275:
270:
265:
260:
255:
250:
245:
239:
237:
234:
212:
209:
204:
203:
192:placebo effect
157:
147:
141:
138:equipment used
135:
129:
107:clinical trial
82:
79:
36:social science
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1106:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1084:Good practice
1082:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1025:
1022:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
993:
990:
978:
976:9781412961271
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
945:
942:
937:
933:
928:
923:
919:
915:
910:
905:
901:
897:
893:
886:
883:
878:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
850:
846:
842:
835:
833:
829:
817:
813:
807:
804:
800:
788:
781:
778:
765:
758:
752:
749:
733:
726:
724:
722:
720:
718:
714:
701:
694:
687:
685:
683:
681:
677:
672:
670:9781137003768
666:
662:
661:
653:
651:
647:
635:
629:
625:
624:
616:
613:
601:
595:
591:
590:
582:
579:
567:
561:
557:
556:
548:
546:
544:
540:
528:
524:
517:
514:
502:
495:
492:
480:
473:
470:
465:
463:9781317438663
459:
455:
454:
446:
443:
431:
425:
421:
420:
412:
410:
408:
404:
392:
386:
382:
381:
373:
370:
363:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
303:
299:
296:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
240:
235:
233:
229:
227:
222:
217:
210:
208:
201:
200:control group
197:
196:observer bias
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
115:
112:
108:
103:
101:
97:
93:
89:
80:
78:
74:
72:
68:
64:
63:blood testing
59:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1034:
1030:
1024:
1014:, retrieved
1002:
992:
980:. Retrieved
958:
954:
944:
899:
895:
885:
848:
845:PLOS Biology
844:
819:. Retrieved
815:
806:
798:
791:. Retrieved
780:
768:. Retrieved
763:
751:
739:. Retrieved
704:. Retrieved
699:
659:
637:. Retrieved
622:
615:
603:. Retrieved
588:
581:
569:. Retrieved
554:
530:. Retrieved
526:
516:
504:. Retrieved
494:
482:. Retrieved
472:
452:
445:
433:. Retrieved
418:
394:. Retrieved
379:
372:
307:Random error
230:
218:
214:
205:
159:
149:
143:
137:
131:
121:
116:
104:
84:
75:
71:transmission
60:
39:
38:research, a
29:
327:Sample size
188:sample size
176:sample size
168:Sample bias
56:peer review
52:replication
1073:Categories
1016:2021-08-10
1003:StatPearls
633:0226251926
599:8171566057
565:0877781516
429:0849394619
390:0471551783
364:References
263:Estimation
224:reported.
132:procedures
90:(GLP) and
48:experiment
1051:1878-5921
918:2046-4053
812:"History"
770:6 October
741:6 October
706:6 October
221:unblinded
144:reporting
1089:Research
1059:24973822
1011:31536248
982:23 March
961:. Sage.
936:25554246
902:(1): 1.
877:26154287
821:23 March
793:23 March
639:22 March
605:23 March
571:22 March
532:22 March
506:22 March
484:22 March
435:22 March
396:22 March
236:See also
184:variance
40:protocol
927:4320440
868:4496034
816:CONSORT
764:ich.org
111:CONSORT
32:natural
1057:
1049:
1009:
973:
934:
924:
916:
875:
865:
667:
630:
596:
562:
460:
426:
387:
258:DRAKON
190:. The
172:sample
122:safety
789:. NIH
760:(PDF)
735:(PDF)
696:(PDF)
527:Motor
105:In a
1055:PMID
1047:ISSN
1007:PMID
984:2019
971:ISBN
932:PMID
914:ISSN
873:PMID
823:2019
795:2019
772:2023
743:2023
708:2023
665:ISBN
641:2019
628:ISBN
607:2019
594:ISBN
573:2019
560:ISBN
534:2019
508:2019
486:2019
458:ISBN
437:2019
424:ISBN
398:2019
385:ISBN
300:and
194:and
182:and
160:bias
34:and
1039:doi
963:doi
922:PMC
904:doi
863:PMC
853:doi
126:SOP
30:In
1075::
1053:.
1045:.
1035:67
1033:.
1001:,
969:.
957:.
953:.
930:.
920:.
912:.
898:.
894:.
871:.
861:.
849:13
847:.
843:.
831:^
814:.
797:.
762:.
716:^
698:.
679:^
649:^
542:^
525:.
406:^
102:.
1061:.
1041::
986:.
965::
938:.
906::
900:4
879:.
855::
825:.
774:.
745:.
710:.
673:.
643:.
609:.
575:.
536:.
510:.
488:.
466:.
439:.
400:.
202:.
128:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.