523:
individual roles can become unclear and confusing. Some individuals act largely in a personal capacity, while others may act on behalf of agencies or organizations. Powerful stakeholder groups may seek to manipulate the process. Stakeholders can also begin to feel 'stakeholder fatigue', a feeling they get when they are repeatedly consulted by different agencies on similar issues. This kind of dynamic can be burdensome and time consuming. Structural issues also affect agendas and outcomes. Open structures with loose leadership and membership allow multiple participants to gain access to a fast expanding agenda. Achieving goals in such a wide agenda becomes more difficult as an increasing number of players struggle to resolve differences and coordinate actions. Furthermore, challenges arise for implementation when representatives are allowed to come and go with no real obligations to other collaborators. Accountability of participating members, unequal or hidden
509:
as a way to identify policy solutions that have greater traction in the community. Additionally, it can contribute new perspectives on issues and policy solutions and thus offer new ways to implement strategies for change. For public officials who work in administration and management, collaborative governance can serve as a way of genuinely allowing a wider array of ideas and suggestions in the policy process. It may also be used to test ideas and analyze responses before implementation. For those who are not involved in formal government, it allows them to better understand the inner workings of government and carry more influence in the decision making process. It also enables them to see beyond government institutions being merely a vehicle for service delivery. They are able to feel ownership and a closer relationship to the system, further
527:, trust between members, power imbalances, and language and cultural barriers are all issues that can arise in collaborative government regimes. Critics argue that collaborative governance does not provide the institutional stability and consistency required, and therefore deters progress. The work of Ansell and Gash (2008) and Emerson, Nabatchi and Balogh (2012) seeks to understand these issues and challenges and identify the social and process conditions required for effective collaborative governance.
453:. Public administrators have blurred the lines between the people, the private sector and the government. Although bureaucracies still remain, public administrators have begun to recognize that more can potentially be achieved by collaboration and networking. Collaboration and partnerships are nothing new in the political realm, however the wider use of this leadership style has gained momentum in recent years. In part, this is a response to
489:'The processes and structures of public policy decision making and management that engage people constructively across the boundaries of public agencies, levels of government, and/or the public, private and civic spheres in order to carry out a public purpose that could not otherwise be accomplished.'.
494:
This framework definition is a broader analytic concept and does not limit collaborative governance to state-initiated arrangements and to engagement between government and non-government sectors. For example, the definition encompasses collaboration between governments at different levels and hybrid
513:
them to be agents within institutional decision making. For both public and private sectors, a commitment to collaboration is likely to drive organizational change and affect resource reallocation. Other advantages include combining relevant skills and capacities, as well as allowing specialization.
508:
and allows these stakeholders to work together and agree on solutions. It can help policy makers identify and target problems and deliver action more effectively. Stakeholders that are involved in developing a solution are more inclined to accept directions given or decisions made. It can thus serve
574:
are seen as inefficient when it comes to engaging citizens and making them a part of the decision making process. Large projects and initiatives require involvement and communication with not only citizens but partnerships with other government and non-government agencies and, in some instances,
522:
The disadvantages of collaborative governance in relation to complex problems are that the process is time consuming, it may not reach agreement on solutions, and the relevant government agencies may not implement the agreed solutions. In a complex structure with many entities working together,
356:
approach of collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an approach to policy making and public management" Collaborative governance covers both the informal and formal relationships in problem solving and decision-making.
618:
These include: three endorsed non-statutory regional plans; two endorsed statutory regional plans; an infrastructure program linked to the State budget; regional sectoral plans for transport, water supply, natural resource management, etc.; new legislation and institutional arrangements for
484:; (4) the forum is formally organized; (5) the forum aims to make decisions by consensus; and (6) the focus of collaboration is on public policy or public management. Emerson, Nabatchi and Balogh (2012) have developed a less normative and less restrictive definition, as follows:
655:. The collaboration between SNEHA, a non-state actor, and ICDS and MCGM, state actors, led to what is considered the only large-scale successful program that implemented community- based approaches to identify, treat, and prevent wasting in urban informal settlements of India.
474:'A governing arrangement where one or more public agencies directly engage non-state stakeholders in a collective decision-making process that is formal, consensus-oriented, and deliberative and that aims to make or implement public policy or manage public programs or assets'.
603:
Governing and managing large and growing metropolitan urban areas, covering numerous local governments and various levels of State and
National governments, provides many governance challenges and opportunities. Abbott has reviewed metropolitan planning in South East
503:
The intent of collaborative governance is to improve the overall practice and effectiveness of public administration. The advantages of effective collaborative governance are that it enables a better and shared understanding of complex problems involving many
351:
communicating with each other and working together to achieve more than any one sector could achieve on its own. Ansell and Gash (2008) have explored the conditions required for effective collaborative governance. They say "The ultimate goal is to develop a
391:
build consensus on actions to address specific public policy problems; Community visioning is a process where members of a community build consensus on a descriptions of the community’s desired future and on actions to help make goals for the future a
357:
Conventional government policy processes can be embedded in wider policy processes by facilitating collaboration between the public, private and community sectors. Collaborative
Governance requires three things, namely: support;
575:
international cooperation with foreign governments and organizations. For example, managing the growing number of official and non-official crossings of the US-Mexico border has required input from all levels of US and
599:
successfully enacted the terms of the 2006 memorandum of understanding, creating inter-agency forums, increasing field coordination and joint operations, and constructing fences and other tactical infrastructure.
479:
This definition involves six criteria: (1) the forum is initiated by public agencies; (2) participants in the forum include non-state actors; (3) participants engage in decision making and are not merely
608:(SEQ), Australia where collaborative governance arrangements, between State and local governments and the regional community, have evolved over a 20-year period leading to positive outputs and outcomes.
514:
Overall, collaborative governance can lead to mutual learning and shared experiences, while also providing direction for institutional capacity building inside and outside agencies and organizations.
889:
Murray, Jessica, et al. "Enhancing
Participatory Governance and Fostering Active Citizenship: An Overview of Local and International Best Practices." Politikon, vol. 37, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 45–66.
652:
591:, and other non-federal agencies for social affairs. All of these parties had to communicate and collaborate to address issues of border security and protecting natural resources. As a result, the
735:
Bradley, Quintin. "A 'Performative' Social
Movement: The Emergence of Collective Contentions within Collaborative Governance" Space and Polity. 16.2. (2012): 215-232. EBSCO. Web. 14 Oct. 2015.
613:
The positive outputs and outcomes of collaborative governance and metropolitan planning in SEQ have been extensive and broad and extend well beyond statutory regional land use planning.
335:
is a broader concept than government and also includes the roles played by the community sector and the private sector in managing and planning countries, regions and cities.
408:; integration of human service delivery; and interconnected strategies for relationship building, learning processes, and measurement and modeling among the participants."
953:
Newman, Janet; Barnes, Marian; Sullivan, Helen and Knops, Andrew (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33(2), pp. 203–223.
566:, governments have attempted to shift the focus towards various forms of co-production with other agencies and sectors and with citizens themselves in order to increase
873:
283:
437:
has emerged as a response to the failures of government policy implementation and to the high cost and politicization of regulation and as an alternative to
1022:
274:
774:
714:
632:
192:
319:
745:
648:
1099:
910:
243:
73:
963:
Emerson, Kirk; and
Nabatchi, Tina (2015). "Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix".
400:– "This system is meant to accomplish more alignment among community needs, strategies of service agencies, priority outcomes, and
786:
Morse, Ricardo; Stephens, John (Summer 2012). "Teaching
Collaborative Governance: Phases, Competencies, and Case-Based Learning".
635:
program in 1975 to ensure appropriate growth and development of all children but this implementation was weak. To improve, in the
1024:
Collaborative
Governance and Metropolitan Planning in South East Queensland - 1990 to 2010: From a voluntary to a Statutory Model
417:
Over the past two decades new collaborative approaches to governing and managing have developed in a range of fields, including:
248:
643:
Society for
Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), to build a child nutrition program for care and prevention of acute
167:
365:
gathers the sectors into a forum. Then, the members of the forum collaborate to develop policies, solutions and answers.
715:"'Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice' Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543-571"
596:
580:
576:
1038:
Chanani, Sheila; Waingankar, Anagha; More, Neena Shah; Pantvaidya, Shanti; Fernandez, Armida; Jayaraman, Anuja (2019).
592:
584:
430:
291:
773:
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative
Governance in Theory and Practice. Retrieved October 16, 2015, from
187:
680:
370:
675:
571:
312:
268:
217:
162:
548:
505:
48:
1115:
670:
640:
238:
172:
78:
867:
442:
426:
395:
376:
212:
202:
157:
142:
1120:
628:
567:
401:
388:
305:
147:
137:
23:
988:
803:
353:
177:
132:
83:
1040:"Effectiveness of NGO-government partnership to prevent and treat child wasting in urban India"
1079:
1061:
980:
906:
422:
110:
1069:
1051:
972:
853:
821:
Ansell, Chris &, Alison Gash (2008). "Collaborative
Governance in Theory and Practice".
795:
524:
182:
105:
753:
588:
450:
207:
197:
152:
68:
535:
Collaborative governance has been used to address many complex social, environmental and
1074:
1039:
563:
555:
536:
418:
405:
348:
53:
1109:
807:
559:
454:
438:
992:
799:
644:
63:
976:
900:
929:
Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2:3, 337-358
544:
510:
458:
446:
651:
to team up with their Nutritional Rehabilitation and Research Centre (NRRC) at
665:
605:
362:
358:
340:
332:
31:
1065:
984:
858:
841:
540:
344:
1083:
619:
metropolitan governance; and capital works such as the SEQ busway network.
539:
issues, including: flood crisis management and urban growth management in
361:; and a forum. The support identifies the policy problem to be fixed. The
1027:. Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government (ACELG), Sydney.
1056:
368:
There are many different forms of collaborative governance as such as
941:
The Power of Co: The Smart Leader's Guide to Collaborative Governance
636:
902:
Collaborative Governance: A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?
469:
Ansell and Gash (2008) define collaborative governance as follows:
495:
partnerships initiated by the private or community sectors.
925:
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000).
701:
Metropolitan Governance without Metropolitan Government? As
1008:
Metropolitan Governance without Metropolitan Government?
775:
http://sites.duke.edu/niou/files/2011/05/Ansell-and-Gash
842:"An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance"
840:
Emerson, Kirk, Tina Nabatchi, Stephen Balogh (2012).
846:
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
823:
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
570:. The classic forms of hierarchical governance and
547:; and public participation in the redesign of the
449:to that of collaboration in the context of the
649:Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM)
752:. Policy Consensus Initiative. Archived from
313:
8:
872:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
633:Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)
965:Public Performance & Management Review
927:The Challenge of Collaborative Governance.
320:
306:
18:
1073:
1055:
857:
713:Ansell, Chris &, Alison Gash (2008).
653:Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital
441:and adversarial approaches. The field of
404:. It's also meant to accomplish building
692:
30:
885:
883:
865:
731:
729:
727:
543:; community visioning and planning in
647:. This partnership also included the
579:, multiple government agencies (like
457:with its focus on the primacy of the
7:
1102:on the website of the Metagovernment
1010:. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, UK.
788:Journal of Public Affairs Education
746:"What is Collaborative Governance?"
16:Collaborative governing arrangement
943:. Twyfords, Wollongong, Australia.
14:
244:Sustainable Governance Indicators
433:; and environmental management.
249:Bertelsmann Transformation Index
703:hgate Publishing, Aldershot UK.
1044:Maternal & Child Nutrition
800:10.1080/15236803.2012.12001700
1:
977:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
562:and countries across much of
549:Ground Zero site in New York
699:Phares, Donald (ed) (2004)
639:, they partnered up with a
445:has changed its focus from
431:natural resource management
292:Market governance mechanism
275:Governance, risk management
1137:
899:Wanna, John (2008-01-01).
284:Environmental, social, and
681:Collaborative e-democracy
1100:Collaborative governance
676:Collaborative leadership
572:representative democracy
461:and the private sector.
435:Collaborative governance
337:Collaborative governance
269:Chief governance officer
1006:Phares, Donald (2004).
671:Open source governance
616:
492:
477:
239:World Governance Index
1021:Abbott, John (2012).
859:10.1093/jopart/mur011
610:
486:
471:
443:public administration
427:public administration
397:Collaborative Network
377:Collaborative Network
581:U.S. Forest Services
286:corporate governance
629:Government of India
577:Mexican governments
568:civic participation
531:Social applications
459:free-market economy
402:resource allocation
387:– "A process where
593:U.S. Border Patrol
585:U.S. Border Patrol
385:Consensus Building
371:Consensus Building
1057:10.1111/mcn.12706
939:Twyfords (2012).
423:regional planning
330:
329:
1128:
1088:
1087:
1077:
1059:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1018:
1012:
1011:
1003:
997:
996:
960:
954:
951:
945:
944:
936:
930:
923:
917:
916:
896:
890:
887:
878:
877:
871:
863:
861:
837:
831:
830:
818:
812:
811:
783:
777:
771:
765:
764:
762:
761:
742:
736:
733:
722:
721:
719:
710:
704:
697:
322:
315:
308:
168:Higher education
74:Multistakeholder
19:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1106:
1105:
1096:
1091:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1005:
1004:
1000:
962:
961:
957:
952:
948:
938:
937:
933:
924:
920:
913:
905:. ANU E Press.
898:
897:
893:
888:
881:
864:
839:
838:
834:
820:
819:
815:
785:
784:
780:
772:
768:
759:
757:
744:
743:
739:
734:
725:
717:
712:
711:
707:
698:
694:
690:
685:
661:
597:Forest Services
589:land management
533:
520:
501:
467:
451:network society
415:
349:private sectors
326:
297:
296:
288:
285:
279:
276:
264:
263:
254:
253:
234:
233:
224:
223:
222:
193:Security sector
188:Political party
127:
126:
117:
116:
115:
100:
99:
90:
89:
88:
43:
42:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1134:
1132:
1124:
1123:
1118:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1095:
1094:External links
1092:
1090:
1089:
1050:(S1): e12706.
1030:
1013:
998:
971:(4): 717–747.
955:
946:
931:
918:
911:
891:
879:
832:
813:
778:
766:
737:
723:
705:
691:
689:
686:
684:
683:
678:
673:
668:
662:
660:
657:
637:city of Mumbai
564:Western Europe
537:urban planning
532:
529:
519:
516:
500:
497:
466:
463:
414:
411:
410:
409:
406:social capital
393:
328:
327:
325:
324:
317:
310:
302:
299:
298:
295:
294:
289:
282:
280:
277:and compliance
273:
271:
265:
262:Related topics
261:
260:
259:
256:
255:
252:
251:
246:
241:
235:
231:
230:
229:
226:
225:
221:
220:
215:
210:
205:
200:
195:
190:
185:
180:
175:
170:
165:
160:
158:Ecclesiastical
155:
150:
145:
140:
135:
129:
128:
124:
123:
122:
119:
118:
114:
113:
108:
102:
101:
97:
96:
95:
92:
91:
87:
86:
81:
76:
71:
66:
61:
56:
51:
45:
44:
40:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1133:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1116:Collaboration
1114:
1113:
1111:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1034:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1017:
1014:
1009:
1002:
999:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
959:
956:
950:
947:
942:
935:
932:
928:
922:
919:
914:
912:9781921536410
908:
904:
903:
895:
892:
886:
884:
880:
875:
869:
860:
855:
851:
847:
843:
836:
833:
828:
824:
817:
814:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
782:
779:
776:
770:
767:
756:on 2015-04-20
755:
751:
747:
741:
738:
732:
730:
728:
724:
716:
709:
706:
702:
696:
693:
687:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
663:
658:
656:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
631:launched the
630:
625:
624:
620:
615:
614:
609:
607:
601:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
552:
550:
546:
542:
538:
530:
528:
526:
518:Disadvantages
517:
515:
512:
507:
498:
496:
491:
490:
485:
483:
476:
475:
470:
464:
462:
460:
456:
455:neoliberalism
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:managerialism
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
412:
407:
403:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
382:
381:
380:
378:
373:
372:
366:
364:
360:
355:
350:
346:
342:
339:involves the
338:
334:
323:
318:
316:
311:
309:
304:
303:
301:
300:
293:
290:
287:
281:
278:
272:
270:
267:
266:
258:
257:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
236:
228:
227:
219:
218:Transnational
216:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
163:Environmental
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
149:
146:
144:
141:
139:
136:
134:
131:
130:
121:
120:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
94:
93:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
70:
67:
65:
62:
60:
59:Collaborative
57:
55:
52:
50:
47:
46:
37:
36:
33:
29:
25:
21:
20:
1047:
1043:
1033:
1023:
1016:
1007:
1001:
968:
964:
958:
949:
940:
934:
926:
921:
901:
894:
868:cite journal
849:
845:
835:
826:
822:
816:
791:
787:
781:
769:
758:. Retrieved
754:the original
749:
740:
708:
700:
695:
645:malnutrition
626:
622:
621:
617:
612:
611:
602:
553:
534:
521:
506:stakeholders
502:
493:
488:
487:
481:
478:
473:
472:
468:
434:
416:
396:
389:stakeholders
384:
375:
369:
367:
336:
331:
58:
852:(1): 1–29.
545:New Zealand
465:Definitions
447:bureaucracy
354:contingency
173:Information
79:Open-source
49:Algorithmic
1121:Governance
1110:Categories
794:(3): 565.
760:2015-05-05
688:References
666:Governance
641:non-profit
606:Queensland
511:empowering
499:Advantages
363:leadership
359:leadership
341:government
333:Governance
213:Technology
203:Simulation
64:Electronic
32:Governance
1066:1740-8709
985:1530-9576
829:(4): 544.
808:169341744
541:Australia
482:consulted
429:and law;
392:reality."
345:community
143:Corporate
1084:30748121
993:53642688
659:See also
232:Measures
148:Cultural
138:Clinical
125:By field
98:By level
24:a series
22:Part of
1075:7198940
554:In the
525:agendas
413:History
178:Network
133:Climate
84:Private
1082:
1072:
1064:
991:
983:
909:
806:
558:, the
374:and a
111:Global
41:Models
989:S2CID
804:S2CID
718:(PDF)
623:India
419:urban
183:Ocean
106:Local
1080:PMID
1062:ISSN
981:ISSN
907:ISBN
874:link
750:NPCC
627:The
595:and
583:and
421:and
347:and
208:Soil
198:Self
153:Data
69:Good
1070:PMC
1052:doi
973:doi
854:doi
796:doi
587:),
560:USA
54:Bad
1112::
1078:.
1068:.
1060:.
1048:15
1046:.
1042:.
987:.
979:.
969:38
967:.
882:^
870:}}
866:{{
850:22
848:.
844:.
827:18
825:.
802:.
792:18
790:.
748:.
726:^
556:UK
551:.
425:;
343:,
26:on
1086:.
1054::
995:.
975::
915:.
876:)
862:.
856::
810:.
798::
763:.
720:.
379::
321:e
314:t
307:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.