302:
ranking of all proteins in a gene cluster in terms of their distance to other proteins. In the simplest case proteins near the center of a cluster are judged to be most informative because their distance to the other proteins in the cluster is relatively small. As a result, functional annotation of a "center" of a cluster is likely to result in the most accurate predictions for the other proteins in the cluster. In evolutionary terms these "cluster centers" are closest to the evolutionary ancestor of all the proteins in the cluster. Active
Learning generalizes this intuition principle to produce recommendations for additional experiments that are likely to either produce accurate predictions or identify proteins that are not annotated correctly.
371:
their validated function results in a large number of new predictions for other genes. At an early stage COMBREX will introduce lists of "high priority" genes, which may be identified as being of significant predictive or biomedical value, and to which COMBREX members may nominate candidates. As a longer-term goal, COMBREX is working towards the use of machine learning techniques such as active learning to optimize the selection of such genes.
315:
experimental effort serves three goals: (1) it brings together directly the scientists who make gene function predictions and those who test them, (2) it evaluates computational methods based on how accurate their predictions are so they can be improved, and (3) it broadens the landscape of experimentally validated genes, improving our overall understanding of biology and of sequence-structure-function relationships.
289:
experimental or computational biologists well acquainted with a particular protein family or biochemical pathway. Thus, predictions made by different methods may be easily compared, contrasted, and examined by experimental biologists. This side-by-side display of function predictions from many sources is the heart of the interaction between computational and experimental communities that COMBREX hopes to foster.
354:
lend themselves to experimental testing, and those that are too specific for the underlying evidence run a high risk of being inaccurate. COMBREX is actively working on developing algorithms for functional prediction that can identify genes with novel or interesting functions, and whose results can sit beside the high-quality predictions received from collaborating computational groups. COMBREX's relatively
333:
method used to make the prediction and the strength of the evidence are rarely stated. COMBREX has taken the first steps toward a more transparent system of annotation by (1) color-coding genes to distinguish observed from predicted functions, and (2) for many functions predicted by sequence similarity, identifying the experimentally validated "source gene" on which the prediction was based.
22:
261:
COMBREX. The database presently consists of genes from over 1000 completely sequenced bacterial and archaeal genomes, supplemented with a number of individual genes whose biochemical function has been experimentally determined. The genes are organized into sequence-similar, and likely isofunctional, groups determined by NCBI, referred to as
Protein Clusters.
268:. By necessity, "predicted functions" may encompass a broad range of specificity, and one of our longer range goals is to quantify this specificity. (For example, the predicted function "valine decarboxylase" is significantly more specific, and more readily verifiable, than "lyase", or even "carboxy-lyase".)
345:
may help overcome the relatively high frequency of unannotated and misannotated genes that results from the static system used in many public databases. Furthermore, it will illuminate those genes whose biochemical functions are truly unknown, as opposed to those that are simply insufficiently annotated.
370:
COMBREX wishes to develop a new, integrative model of research in which experiments are prioritized to close the largest gaps in our overall predictive understanding of gene function. Such a model favors the validation of genes that provide relatively large increases in knowledge, for example because
366:
Through its funding decisions, COMBREX can help broaden as well as deepen our understanding of biochemical gene function by encouraging experimental investigation of specific genes. The choice of which genes to validate is an important one: little overall new knowledge is gained by validating closely
340:
COMBREX is the first database that attempts to "computationally" identify the link to the experimental source of an annotation using homology. Other databases provide two types of evidence, e.g. inferred directly from experiments or inferred computationally. However, the inference cannot be typically
318:
The experimental investigation of the biochemical function of a single gene or small number of genes is often beneath the purview of large funding agencies. COMBREX is set up to issue small grants for exactly this type of work, and such grants are particularly suited for laboratories already familiar
344:
This system of identifying source genes and functions, and evidential links, will enable a dynamic system of annotation that is automatically updated as experimental evidence for new genes is determined, and as new predictive methods are developed. Such a dynamic system of gene functional annotation
305:
In addition to evolutionary analysis and Active
Learning COMBREX also points to other criteria that might be considered in considering experiments. Such criteria include whether there is a structure available, conservation of the bacterial gene in the human genome (e.g. domain sharing), availability
246:
COMBREX is a multifaceted project that aims to bring together the computational and experimental communities of biologists in the interest of improving our understanding of microbial gene function and accelerating the annotation of microbial gene function. The COMBREX project was co-founded by Simon
396:
Roberts, Richard J; Chang Yi-Chien; Hu
Zhenjun; Rachlin John N; Anton Brian P; Pokrzywa Revonda M; Choi Han-Pil; Faller Lina L; Guleria Jyotsna; Housman Genevieve; Klitgord Niels; Mazumdar Varun; McGettrick Mark G; Osmani Lais; Swaminathan Rajeswari; Tao Kevin R; Letovsky Stan; Vitkup Dennis; Segrè
379:
COMBREX encourages the development of new technologies and cost-effective assays for gene function determination. The experimental validation effort described above amounts to a massively parallel application of low-throughput experiments via many small-scale grants. High-throughput assays that can
353:
Making gene functional predictions transparent is important, but equally important is making them as accurate as possible. Predictions need to be commensurate with the strength of evidence for them, such that they are as specific as the evidence will allow. Those that are not specific enough do not
314:
One of the missions of COMBREX is to issue small monetary grants for the experimental validation of specific gene predictions. The experimental determination of biochemical function for specific gene products serves to validate (or invalidate) the computational predictions made a priori. Thus, this
284:
The COMBREX database serves as a venue for computational biologists to publicize their most informative gene function predictions. A major effort within the bio-informatics field has been the computational prediction of gene function. There have been significant advances in this field over the last
301:
methodologies to recommend the most informative experiments. These are experiments that are most likely to generate the most informative (in the mathematical sense of maximizing information gain) predictions for the largest number of proteins in the database. The most basic recommendations provide
288:
The COMBREX database, besides drawing information from familiar sources such as NCBI and UniProtKB, also displays gene function predictions submitted by individual laboratories. Such predictions may be generated in large scale using computational algorithms, or may be made for individual genes by
260:
This evolving database consists of experimentally determined and computationally predicted functions for more than three million microbial genes. Searching for a gene or genes of interest may be an end in itself, or it may be a first step toward contributing information to or seeking a grant from
332:
One of the current problems with gene and genome annotation is a lack of transparency with respect to source. It is often difficult to determine which functions have been determined experimentally and which are predicted computationally. Furthermore, for computationally predicted functions, the
336:
COMBREX is working towards a more completely traceable annotation system, in which every stated functional annotation is either experimentally determined, or is a prediction explicitly linked through a chain of evidence to an ultimate source of information. These sources will in many cases be
367:
similar relatives of isofunctional genes, and validating experiments for genes with no specific predicted functions are unlikely to succeed. Furthermore, the landscape of what is already known is uneven, with many validated examples of some functions and few or no examples of others.
285:
decade or so, but many of these efforts have not realized their full potential to advance biological knowledge due to the fact that predictions are rarely experimentally tested, and predicted functions for individual genes made by competing methods are rarely directly compared.
247:
Kasif, Richard
Roberts and Martin Steffen as an international consortium with a headquarters at Boston University and over 100 experimental and computational collaborators. The project was inspired by a call for community action published in PLoS Biology by Richard J. Roberts.
271:
Identification of genes whose products have been experimentally verified is also not a trivial task, and so we have embarked on a project to create a comprehensive, manually curated set of all such genes, which we refer to as the
341:
traced to the experimental source of the annotation. COMBREX cannot guarantee that the "traces" it provides are accurate at this point but it enables biologists to make this determination directly by examining the link.
306:
of computational or experimental evidence of gene function, phenotypical considerations (such as presence in a pathogen or relation to antibiotic resistance, pathogenicity or virulence) and others.
380:
analyze many gene products in parallel may result in the determination of function for many genes simultaneously, and may help make large strides in our overall understanding of gene function.
264:
A color-coding system is used to identify which genes have experimentally determined functions, which have computationally predicted functions, and which have no known or predicted function
32:
337:
experimentally validated genes, but in some cases will be annotations from existing databases whose sources are themselves not immediately apparent.
298:
231:
276:. This curated set is at present unique to the COMBREX database, and genes belonging to it are color-coded with a gold symbol.
119:
47:
571:
90:
62:
69:
76:
576:
58:
227:
134:
178:
581:
548:
479:
428:
188:
168:
538:
528:
469:
459:
418:
410:
163:
474:
447:
423:
398:
543:
516:
565:
293:
Recommendation and prioritization of experiments based on Active
Learning principles.
83:
355:
399:"COMBREX: a project to accelerate the functional annotation of prokaryotic genomes"
397:
Daniel; Salzberg Steven L; Delisi
Charles; Steffen Martin; Kasif Simon (Jan 2011).
533:
464:
265:
21:
235:
151:
138:
273:
552:
483:
432:
192:
414:
226:
is a multifaceted project that includes a database of gene annotations,
146:
118:
319:
with the types of assays required for the intended experiments.
448:"The COMBREX project: design, methodology, and initial results"
15:
297:
COMBREX uses simple principles as well as more sophisticated
517:"Identifying protein function--a call for community action"
501:
215:
39:
43:
356:
conservative BLAST-based propagation of gene function
310:
211:
206:
198:
184:
174:
162:
157:
145:
130:
125:
358:represents a simple first step towards this goal.
234:principles associated with millions of genes in
112:COMBREX: COMputational BRidges to EXperiments
8:
111:
48:introducing citations to additional sources
110:
542:
532:
473:
463:
422:
38:Relevant discussion may be found on the
507:
388:
7:
409:(Database issue). England: D11–4.
14:
256:A Database of genes and functions
362:Targeted experimental validation
117:
31:relies largely or entirely on a
20:
446:Anton, B.; et al. (2013).
1:
230:and recommendations based on
534:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020042
465:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001638
349:Improved predictive accuracy
280:Predictions of Gene Function
274:Gold Standard Gene Database
598:
515:Roberts, Richard (2004).
116:
328:Improved gene annotation
228:functional predictions
502:http://combrex.bu.edu
216:http://combrex.bu.edu
135:functional annotation
572:Biological databases
44:improve this article
415:10.1093/nar/gkq1168
236:prokaryotic genomes
139:prokaryotic genomes
113:
403:Nucleic Acids Res
221:
220:
179:Richard J Roberts
169:Boston University
109:
108:
94:
589:
557:
556:
546:
536:
512:
488:
487:
477:
467:
443:
437:
436:
426:
393:
375:New technologies
185:Primary citation
121:
114:
104:
101:
95:
93:
52:
24:
16:
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
562:
561:
560:
514:
513:
509:
498:
491:
458:(8): e1001638.
445:
444:
440:
395:
394:
390:
386:
377:
364:
351:
330:
325:
312:
299:Active Learning
295:
282:
258:
253:
244:
232:Active Learning
164:Research center
105:
99:
96:
53:
51:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
585:
584:
579:
574:
564:
563:
559:
558:
506:
505:
504:
497:
496:External links
494:
490:
489:
438:
387:
385:
382:
376:
373:
363:
360:
350:
347:
329:
326:
324:
321:
311:
308:
294:
291:
281:
278:
257:
254:
252:
249:
243:
240:
219:
218:
213:
209:
208:
204:
203:
200:
196:
195:
186:
182:
181:
176:
172:
171:
166:
160:
159:
155:
154:
149:
143:
142:
132:
128:
127:
123:
122:
107:
106:
42:. Please help
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
569:
567:
554:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
526:
522:
518:
511:
508:
503:
500:
499:
495:
493:
485:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
457:
453:
449:
442:
439:
434:
430:
425:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
392:
389:
383:
381:
374:
372:
368:
361:
359:
357:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
327:
322:
320:
316:
309:
307:
303:
300:
292:
290:
286:
279:
277:
275:
269:
267:
262:
255:
250:
248:
241:
239:
237:
233:
229:
225:
217:
214:
210:
205:
201:
197:
194:
190:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
170:
167:
165:
161:
156:
153:
150:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
129:
124:
120:
115:
103:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
68:
64:
61: –
60:
56:
55:Find sources:
49:
45:
41:
35:
34:
33:single source
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
524:
520:
510:
492:
455:
451:
441:
406:
402:
391:
378:
369:
365:
352:
343:
339:
335:
331:
317:
313:
304:
296:
287:
283:
270:
263:
259:
245:
223:
222:
199:Release date
97:
87:
80:
73:
66:
54:
30:
577:Prokaryotes
152:Prokaryotes
131:Description
566:Categories
527:(3): E42.
384:References
70:newspapers
521:PLOS Biol
452:PLOS Biol
147:Organisms
59:"Combrex"
40:talk page
582:Genomics
553:15024411
484:24013487
433:21097892
193:21097892
100:May 2020
475:3754883
424:3013729
251:Content
224:COMBREX
212:Website
175:Authors
158:Contact
126:Content
84:scholar
551:
544:368155
541:
482:
472:
431:
421:
266:(info)
207:Access
191:
86:
79:
72:
65:
57:
323:Goals
242:About
91:JSTOR
77:books
549:PMID
480:PMID
429:PMID
202:2010
189:PMID
63:news
539:PMC
529:doi
470:PMC
460:doi
419:PMC
411:doi
137:of
46:by
568::
547:.
537:.
523:.
519:.
478:.
468:.
456:11
454:.
450:.
427:.
417:.
407:39
405:.
401:.
238:.
555:.
531::
525:2
486:.
462::
435:.
413::
141:.
102:)
98:(
88:·
81:·
74:·
67:·
50:.
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
