Knowledge

Concept testing

Source đź“ť

536:"Monadic testing is the recommended method for most concept testing. Interaction effects and biases are avoided. Results from one test can be compared to results from previous monadic tests. A normative database can be constructed." However, each has its specific uses and it depends on the research objectives. The decision as to which method to use is best left to experience research professionals to decide, as there are numerous implications in terms of how the results are interpreted. 545:
ratings of old products that consumers are already familiar with; since once consumers become familiar with a product the ratings often drop. Comparing new concept ratings to the ratings for an existing product already on the market would result in an invalid comparison, unless special precautions are taken by researchers to reduce or adjust for this effect quantitatively. Additionally, the concept is usually only compared to norms from the same product category, and the same country.
569:
techniques estimate the importance of product attributes indirectly, by creating alternative products according to an experimental design, and then using consumer responses to these alternatives (usually ratings of purchase likelihood or choices made between alternatives) to estimate importance. The results are often expressed in the form of a 'simulator' tool which allows clients to test alternative product configurations and pricing.
507:
deliberate: examples include brain-storming sessions, problem detection surveys and qualitative research. While qualitative research can provide insights into the range of reactions consumers may have, it cannot provide an indication of the likely success of the new concept; this is better left to quantitative concept-test surveys.
584:
Some models (more properly referred to as 'pre-test market models' or 'simulated test markets') gather additional data from a follow-up product testing survey (especially in the case of consumer packaged goods as repeat purchase rates need to be estimated). They may also include advertisement testing
552:
Perhaps one of the famous concept-test systems is the Nielsen Bases system, which comes in different versions. Other well-known products include Decision Analyst's 'Concept Check', Acupoll's 'Concept Optimizer', Ipsos Innoquest and GFK. Examples of smaller players include Skuuber and Acentric Express
577:
Volumetric concept testing falls somewhere between traditional concept testing and pre-test market models (simulated test market models are similar but emphasize greater realism) in terms of the level of complexity. The aim is to provide 'approximate' sales volume forecasts for the new concept prior
479:
It is important that the instruments (questionnaires) to test the product have a high quality themselves. Otherwise, results from data gathered surveys may be biased by measurement error. That makes the design of the testing procedure more complex. Empirical tests provide insight into the quality of
564:
However, various debates have existed over whether or not consumers could be trusted to directly indicate the level of importance of each product attribute. As a result, correlation analysis and various forms of multiple regression have often been used for identifying importance - as an alternative
510:
In the early stages of concept testing, a large field of alternative concepts might exist, requiring concept-screening surveys. Concept-screening surveys provide a quick means to narrow the field of options; however they provide little depth of insight and cannot be compared to a normative database
568:
A complementary technique to concept testing, is conjoint analysis (also referred to as discrete choice modelling). Various forms of conjoint analysis and discrete choice modelling exist. While academics stress the differences between the two, in practice there is often little difference. These
544:
Traditionally concept-test survey results are compared to 'norms databases'. These are databases of previous new-product concept tests. These must be 'monadic' concept tests, to prevent interaction effects. To be fair, it is important that these databases contain 'new' concept test results, not
506:
Concept testing in the new product development (NPD) process is the concept generation stage. The concept generation stage of concept testing can take on many forms. Sometimes concepts are generated incidentally, as the result of technological advances. At other times concept generation is
471:. It is important not to confuse concept testing with advertising testing, brand testing and packaging testing, as is sometimes done. Concept testing focuses on the basic product idea, without the embellishments and puffery inherent in advertising. 548:
Companies that specialize in this area, tend to have developed their own unique systems, each with its own standards. Keeping to these standards consistently is important to preventing contamination of the results.
491:
carrying out a small pretest of the questionnaire, using a small subset of target respondents. Results can inform a researcher of errors such as missing questions, or logical and procedural errors.
561:
The simplest approach to determining attribute importance is to ask direct open-ended questions. Alternatively checklists or ratings of the importance of each product attribute may be used.
488:. By asking a faction of potential-respondents about their interpretation of the questions and use of the questionnaire, a researcher can verify the viability of the cognitive interviewing. 511:
due to interactions between concepts. For greater insight and to reach decisions on whether or not pursue further product development, monadic concept-testing surveys must be conducted.
519:
Frequently concept testing surveys are described as either monadic, sequential monadic, comparative, or proto-monadic. The terms mainly refer to how the concepts are displayed:
689:
Andrews, F. M. (1984). Construct validity and error components of survey measures: a structural modelling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409-442.
494:
estimating the measurement quality of the questions. This can be done for instance using test-retest, quasi-simplex, or mutlitrait-multimethod models.
872: 698:
Saris, W. E. and Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Design, evaluation and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Second Edition. Hoboken, Wiley.
831: 631: 439: 656: 585:
component that aims to assess advertising quality. Some such as Decision Analyst, include discrete choice models / conjoint analysis.
578:
to launch. They incorporate other variables beyond just input from the concept test survey itself, such as the distribution strategy.
680:
Heise, D. R.(1969). Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review, 34, 93-101.
464: 862: 497:
predicting the measurement quality of the question. This can be done using the software Survey Quality Predictor (SQP).
762: 463:
which may be used at a later stage of product development research) is the process of using surveys (and sometimes
363: 581:
Examples of volumetric forecasting methodologies include 'Acupoll Foresight' and Decision Analyst's 'Conceptor'.
877: 867: 87: 432: 378: 358: 343: 157: 132: 107: 47: 167: 353: 205: 117: 102: 467:) to evaluate consumer acceptance of a new product idea prior to the introduction of a product to the 485: 368: 298: 260: 172: 152: 67: 31: 318: 308: 245: 122: 62: 594: 468: 425: 401: 338: 328: 323: 275: 127: 92: 671:
Lord, F. and Novick, M. R.(1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison – Wesley.
852: 827: 736: 709: 652: 627: 411: 280: 255: 250: 225: 142: 137: 599: 406: 303: 240: 230: 210: 195: 162: 147: 112: 97: 77: 857: 396: 270: 72: 526:
Sequential monadic. Multiple concepts are evaluated in sequence (often randomized order).
792: 820: 620: 313: 846: 348: 235: 16:
Surveys to judge the success of a new product before its introduction to the market
532:
Proto-monadic. Concepts are first shown in sequence, and then next to each other.
215: 190: 82: 373: 333: 265: 22: 770: 52: 649:
Concept Testing: How to Test New Product Ideas Before You Go to Market
57: 557:
Determining the importance of concept attributes as purchase drivers
220: 200: 529:
Comparative. Concepts are shown next to each other.
819: 619: 651:(1st ed.). American Management Association. 737:"Concept Testing (And The "Uniqueness" Paradox)" 710:"Concept Testing (And The "Uniqueness" Paradox)" 822:NEW-PRODUCT FORECASTING MODELS AND APPLICATIONS 622:NEW-PRODUCT FORECASTING MODELS AND APPLICATIONS 523:Monadic. The concept is evaluated in isolation. 433: 8: 440: 426: 18: 763:"ForeSIGHT™ Going-Year Volume Estimates" 480:the questionnaire. This can be done by: 610: 21: 7: 793:"Conceptor® Volumetric Forecasting" 14: 873:Science and technology studies 540:Evaluating concept-test scores 1: 735:Thomas, Jerry (2016-01-11). 708:Thomas, Jerry (2016-01-11). 894: 573:Volumetric concept testing 455:(to be distinguished from 364:Promotional representative 647:Schwartz, David (1987). 359:Promotional merchandise 344:Out-of-home advertising 133:Account-based marketing 486:cognitive interviewing 168:Horizontal integration 565:to direct questions. 354:Product demonstration 206:Corporate anniversary 863:Innovation economics 818:Wind, Yoram (1984). 618:Wind, Yoram (1984). 369:Visual merchandising 299:Behavioral targeting 173:Vertical integration 153:Influencer marketing 826:. Lexington Books. 626:. Lexington Books. 465:qualitative methods 319:In-game advertising 309:Display advertising 185:Promotional content 743:. Decision Analyst 716:. Decision Analyst 595:marketing research 515:Presentation modes 402:Marketing research 339:Online advertising 329:Native advertising 324:Mobile advertising 276:Sex in advertising 93:Consumer behaviour 833:978-0-669-04102-6 633:978-0-669-04102-6 450: 449: 412:Consumer research 293:Promotional media 281:Underwriting spot 256:Product placement 236:On-hold messaging 226:Loyalty marketing 143:Product marketing 138:Digital marketing 885: 838: 837: 825: 815: 809: 808: 806: 804: 797:Decision Analyst 789: 783: 782: 780: 778: 773:on 31 March 2017 769:. Archived from 759: 753: 752: 750: 748: 741:Decision Analyst 732: 726: 725: 723: 721: 714:Decision Analyst 705: 699: 696: 690: 687: 681: 678: 672: 669: 663: 662: 644: 638: 637: 625: 615: 600:proof of concept 457:pre-test markets 442: 435: 428: 407:Mystery shopping 304:Brand ambassador 241:Personal selling 231:Mobile marketing 211:Direct marketing 196:Ambush marketing 163:Annoyance factor 148:Social marketing 98:Consumer culture 78:Brand management 19: 893: 892: 888: 887: 886: 884: 883: 882: 878:Market research 868:Product testing 843: 842: 841: 834: 817: 816: 812: 802: 800: 791: 790: 786: 776: 774: 761: 760: 756: 746: 744: 734: 733: 729: 719: 717: 707: 706: 702: 697: 693: 688: 684: 679: 675: 670: 666: 659: 646: 645: 641: 634: 617: 616: 612: 608: 591: 559: 542: 517: 504: 502:Concept testing 477: 453:Concept testing 446: 417: 416: 397:Market research 392: 384: 383: 294: 286: 285: 271:Sales promotion 186: 178: 177: 73:Brand licensing 43: 17: 12: 11: 5: 891: 889: 881: 880: 875: 870: 865: 860: 855: 845: 844: 840: 839: 832: 810: 784: 754: 727: 700: 691: 682: 673: 664: 658:978-0814459058 657: 639: 632: 609: 607: 604: 603: 602: 597: 590: 587: 558: 555: 541: 538: 534: 533: 530: 527: 524: 516: 513: 503: 500: 499: 498: 495: 492: 489: 476: 475:Questionnaires 473: 448: 447: 445: 444: 437: 430: 422: 419: 418: 415: 414: 409: 404: 399: 393: 390: 389: 386: 385: 382: 381: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 326: 321: 316: 314:Drip marketing 311: 306: 301: 295: 292: 291: 288: 287: 284: 283: 278: 273: 268: 263: 258: 253: 248: 243: 238: 233: 228: 223: 218: 213: 208: 203: 198: 193: 187: 184: 183: 180: 179: 176: 175: 170: 165: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 88:Communications 85: 80: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 44: 41: 40: 37: 36: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 890: 879: 876: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 854: 851: 850: 848: 835: 829: 824: 823: 814: 811: 798: 794: 788: 785: 772: 768: 764: 758: 755: 742: 738: 731: 728: 715: 711: 704: 701: 695: 692: 686: 683: 677: 674: 668: 665: 660: 654: 650: 643: 640: 635: 629: 624: 623: 614: 611: 605: 601: 598: 596: 593: 592: 588: 586: 582: 579: 575: 574: 570: 566: 562: 556: 554: 550: 546: 539: 537: 531: 528: 525: 522: 521: 520: 514: 512: 508: 501: 496: 493: 490: 487: 483: 482: 481: 474: 472: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 443: 438: 436: 431: 429: 424: 423: 421: 420: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 394: 388: 387: 380: 379:Word-of-mouth 377: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 349:Point of sale 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 310: 307: 305: 302: 300: 297: 296: 290: 289: 282: 279: 277: 274: 272: 269: 267: 264: 262: 259: 257: 254: 252: 249: 247: 244: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 202: 199: 197: 194: 192: 189: 188: 182: 181: 174: 171: 169: 166: 164: 161: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 131: 129: 126: 124: 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109: 108:Effectiveness 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 64: 61: 59: 56: 54: 51: 49: 46: 45: 39: 38: 33: 30: 29: 28: 27: 24: 20: 821: 813: 801:. Retrieved 799:. 2015-12-28 796: 787: 775:. Retrieved 771:the original 766: 757: 745:. Retrieved 740: 730: 718:. Retrieved 713: 703: 694: 685: 676: 667: 648: 642: 621: 613: 583: 580: 576: 572: 571: 567: 563: 560: 551: 547: 543: 535: 518: 509: 505: 478: 461:test markets 460: 456: 452: 451: 123:Segmentation 48:Distribution 42:Key concepts 484:conducting 216:Franchising 191:Advertising 158:Attribution 83:Co-creation 847:Categories 606:References 374:Web banner 261:Propaganda 68:Activation 32:Management 334:New media 266:Publicity 118:Promotion 103:Dominance 23:Marketing 853:Aptitude 803:21 April 777:21 April 747:21 April 720:21 April 589:See also 391:Research 246:Premiums 201:Branding 128:Strategy 767:Acupoll 63:Service 53:Pricing 858:Design 830:  655:  630:  553:Test. 469:market 251:Prizes 113:Ethics 58:Retail 221:Label 828:ISBN 805:2017 779:2017 749:2017 722:2017 653:ISBN 628:ISBN 459:and 849:: 795:. 765:. 739:. 712:. 836:. 807:. 781:. 751:. 724:. 661:. 636:. 441:e 434:t 427:v

Index

Marketing
Management
Distribution
Pricing
Retail
Service
Activation
Brand licensing
Brand management
Co-creation
Communications
Consumer behaviour
Consumer culture
Dominance
Effectiveness
Ethics
Promotion
Segmentation
Strategy
Account-based marketing
Digital marketing
Product marketing
Social marketing
Influencer marketing
Attribution
Annoyance factor
Horizontal integration
Vertical integration
Advertising
Ambush marketing

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑