Construction grammar - Knowledge (XXG)

967:

multiple-inheritance hierarchy of typed feature structures. The most important type of feature structure in SBCG is the sign, with subtypes word, lexeme and phrase. The inclusion of phrase within the canon of signs marks a major departure from traditional syntactic thinking. In SBCG, phrasal signs are licensed by correspondence to the mother of some licit construct of the grammar. A construct is a local tree with signs at its nodes. Combinatorial constructions define classes of constructs. Lexical class constructions describe combinatoric and other properties common to a group of lexemes. Combinatorial constructions include both inflectional and derivational constructions. SBCG is both formal and generative; while cognitive-functional grammarians have often opposed their standards and practices to those of formal, generative grammarians, there is in fact no incompatibility between a formal, generative approach and a rich, broad-coverage, functionally based grammar. It simply happens that many formal, generative theories are descriptively inadequate grammars. SBCG is generative in a way that prevailing syntax-centered theories are not: its mechanisms are intended to represent all of the patterns of a given language, including idiomatic ones; there is no 'core' grammar in SBCG. SBCG a licensing-based theory, as opposed to one that freely generates syntactic combinations and uses general principles to bar illicit ones: a word, lexeme or phrase is well formed if and only if it is described by a lexeme or construction. Recent SBCG works have expanded on the lexicalist model of idiomatically combining expressions sketched out in Sag 2012.

958:. Immanent within BCG works like Fillmore and Kay 1995 and Michaelis and Ruppenhofer 2001 is the notion that phrasal representations—embedding relations—should not be used to represent combinatoric properties of lexemes or lexeme classes. For example, BCG abandons the traditional practice of using non-branching domination (NP over N' over N) to describe undetermined nominals that function as NPs, instead introducing a determination construction that requires ('asks for') a non-maximal nominal sister and a lexical 'maximality' feature for which plural and mass nouns are unmarked. BCG also offers a unification-based representation of 'argument structure' patterns as abstract verbal lexeme entries ('linking constructions'). These linking constructions include transitive, oblique goal and passive constructions. These constructions describe classes of verbs that combine with phrasal constructions like the VP construction but contain no phrasal information in themselves. 1024:. Radical construction grammar rejects the idea that syntactic categories, roles, and relations are universal and argues that they are not only language-specific, but also construction specific. Thus, there are no universals that make reference to formal categories, since formal categories are language- and construction-specific. The only universals are to be found in the patterns concerning the mapping of meaning onto form. Radical construction grammar rejects the notion of syntactic relations altogether and replaces them with semantic relations. Like Goldbergian/Lakovian construction grammar and cognitive grammar, radical construction grammar is closely related to cognitive linguistics, and like cognitive grammar, radical construction grammar appears to be based on the idea that form is semantically motivated. 1202:

modelled for them in parental speech. Examining the maternal speech addressed to the children, Ninio also found that the pattern of subjects, direct objects and indirect objects in mothers’ speech does not provide the required prototypical semantics for the construction to be established. Adele Goldberg and her associates had previously reported similar negative results concerning the pattern of direct objects in parental speech. These findings are a blow to the CxG theory that relies on a learned association of form and prototypical meaning in order to set up the constructions said to form the basic units of syntax.

466: 569:). Any linguistic pattern is considered to be a construction as long as some aspect of its form or its meaning cannot be predicted from its component parts, or from other constructions that are recognized to exist. In construction grammar, every utterance is understood to be a combination of multiple different constructions, which together specify its precise meaning and form. 1084:. FCG is a fully operational and computationally implemented formalism for construction grammars and proposes a uniform mechanism for parsing and production. Moreover, it has been demonstrated through robotic experiments that FCG grammars can be grounded in embodiment and sensorimotor experiences. FCG integrates many notions from contemporary 816:. The argument goes that words and complex constructions are both pairs of form and meaning and differ only in internal symbolic complexity. Instead of being discrete modules and thus subject to very different processes they form the extremes of a continuum (from regular to idiosyncratic): syntax > 1196:

As the pairing of the syntactic construction and its prototypical meaning are learned in early childhood, children should initially learn the basic constructions with their prototypical semantics, that is, 'agent of action' for the subject in the SV relation, 'affected object of agent's action' for

1187:

Lastly, the most basic syntactic patterns of English, namely the core grammatical relations subject-verb, verb object and verb-indirect object, are counter-evidence for the very concept of constructions as pairings of linguistic patterns with meanings. Instead of the postulated form-meaning pairing,

966:

In the mid-2000s, several of the developers of BCG, including Charles Fillmore, Paul Kay, Ivan Sag and Laura Michaelis, collaborated in an effort to improve the formal rigor of BCG and clarify its representational conventions. The result was Sign Based Construction Grammar (SBCG). SBCG is based on a

928:

This means that construction grammarians argue, for instance, that active and passive versions of the same proposition are not derived from an underlying structure, but are instances of two different constructions. As constructions are pairings of form and meaning, active and passive versions of the

649:

construction was a second classic. These two papers propelled cognitive linguists into the study of CxG. Since the late 1990s there has been a shift towards a general preference for the usage-based model. The shift towards the usage-based approach in construction grammar has inspired the development

791:

In construction grammar, a grammatical construction, regardless of its formal or semantic complexity and make up, is a pairing of form and meaning. Thus words and word classes may be regarded as instances of constructions. Indeed, construction grammarians argue that all pairings of form and meaning

1117:

models. This is largely due to the representational convenience of CxG models and their potential to integrate with current tokenizers as a perceptual layer for further processing in neurally inspired models. Approaches to integrate constructional grammar with existing Natural Language Processing

1092:

and unification-based language processing. Constructions are considered bidirectional and hence usable both for parsing and production. Processing is flexible in the sense that it can even cope with partially ungrammatical or incomplete sentences. FCG is called 'fluid' because it acknowledges the

1192:

lists the multiple semantic roles of subjects and direct objects in English. As these phenomena are well-established, some linguists propose that core grammatical relations be excluded from CxG as they are not constructions, leaving the theory to be a model merely of idioms or infrequently used,

705:

as they are exposed to them, using general cognitive processes. It is argued that children pay close attention to each utterance they hear, and gradually make generalizations based on the utterances they have heard. Because constructions are learned, they are expected to vary considerably across

628:, in order to analyze idioms and fixed expressions. Lakoff's 1977 paper "Linguistic Gestalts" put forward an early version of CxG, arguing that the meaning of an expression was not simply a function of the meanings of its parts. Instead, he suggested, constructions themselves must have meanings. 1201:

examined the speech of a large sample of young English-speaking children and found that they do not in fact learn the syntactic patterns with the prototypical semantics claimed to be associated with them, or with any single semantics. The major reason is that such pairings are not consistently

996:

framework is described as a type of construction grammar. Cognitive grammar deals mainly with the semantic content of constructions, and its central argument is that conceptual semantics is primary to the degree that form mirrors, or is motivated by, content. Langacker argues that even abstract

888:

According to the default inheritance model, each network has a default central form-meaning pairing from which all instances inherit their features. It thus operates with a fairly high level of generalization, but does also allow for some redundancy in that it recognizes extensions of different

979:

and the structure of constructional networks. In terms of form and function, this type of construction grammar puts psychological plausibility as its highest desideratum. It emphasizes experimental results and parallels with general cognitive psychology. It also draws on certain principles of

1118:

frameworks include hand-built feature sets and templates and used computational models to identify their prevalence in text collections, but some suggestions for more emergent models have been proposed, e.g. in the 2023 Georgetown University Roundtable on Linguistics.

1036:

group at ICSI, UC Berkeley, and the University of Hawaiʻi, particularly including Benjamin Bergen and Nancy Chang, adopts the basic constructionist definition of a grammatical construction, but emphasizes the relation of constructional semantic content to

901:

In the complete inheritance model, information is stored only once at the most superordinate level of the network. Instances at all other levels inherit features from the superordinate item. The complete inheritance does not allow for redundancy in the

686:, which are arbitrary and specific, and grammatical rules, which are completely general. Instead, CxG posits that there are linguistic patterns at every level of generality and specificity: from individual words, to partially filled constructions (e.g. 775:

in which all structural aspects are integrated parts and not distributed over different modules as they are in the componential model. Consequentially, not only constructions that are lexically fixed, like many idioms, but also more abstract ones like

666:

One of the most distinctive features of CxG is its use of multi-word expressions and phrasal patterns as the building blocks of syntactic analysis. One example is the Correlative Conditional construction, found in the proverbial expression

757:, frames, conceptual metaphors, conceptual metonymies, prototypes of various kinds, mental spaces, and bindings across these (called "blends"). Pragmatics just becomes the cognitive semantics of communication—the modern version of the old 945:

Berkeley Construction Grammar (BCG: formerly also called simply Construction Grammar in upper case) focuses on the formal aspects of constructions and makes use of a unification-based framework for description of syntax, not unlike

1188:

core grammatical relations possess a wide variability of semantics, exhibiting a neutralization of semantic distinctions. For instance, in a detailed discussion of the dissociation of grammatical case-roles from semantics,

1133:, William Croft and George Lakoff. According to Itkonen, construction grammarians have appropriated old ideas in linguistics adding some false claims. For example, construction type and conceptual blending correspond to 641:

There-constructions followed from the pragmatic meaning of the construction, and that variations on the central construction could be seen as simple extensions using form-meaning pairs of the central construction.

1020:, and Croft argues that constructions are not derived from their parts, but that the parts are derived from the constructions they appear in. Thus, in radical construction grammar, constructions are linked to 1061:

model of representation. A non-technical introduction to the NTL theory behind embodied construction grammar as well as the theory itself and a variety of applications can be found in Jerome Feldman's

876:, meaning that linguistic knowledge is acquired in a bottom-up manner through use. It allows for redundancy and generalizations, because the language user generalizes over recurring experiences of use. 2180:

p. 600 "So what is supposed to be new? Mainly that "argument structure constructions thus have their own meaning, independent of lexical material" ... But this is not new, this is ancient."

2605:

Symbol Grounding and Beyond: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication, EELC 2006, Rome, Italy, September 30–October 1, 2006

679:). Advocates of CxG argue these kinds of idiosyncratic patterns are more common than is often recognized, and that they are best understood as multi-word, partially filled constructions. 937:

As mentioned above, Construction grammar is a "family" of theories rather than one unified theory. There are a number of formalized Construction grammar frameworks. Some of these are:

2512: 1969:

Sag, Ivan A. (2012) Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis, in H. C. Boas and I. A. Sag, (eds), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications). 69-202

572:

Advocates of construction grammar argue that language and culture are not designed by people, but are 'emergent' or automatically constructed in a process which is comparable to

1305:

Beckner, Clay; Blythe, Richard; Bybee, Joan; Christiansen, Morten H.; Croft, William; Ellis, Nick C.; Holland, John; Ke, Jinyun; Larsen-Freeman, Diane; Schoenemann, Tom (2009).

2600:

De Beule Joachim and Steels Luc (2005). Hierarchy in Fluid Construction Grammar. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNCS/LNAI) 3698 (2005) pages 1–15). Berlin: Springer.

596:

in memetics and other cultural replicator theories. It is argued that construction grammar is not an original model of cultural evolution, but for essential part the same as

1172:, an evolutionary approach which adheres to the Darwinian view of language and culture. Advocates of construction grammar argue that memetics takes the perspective of 860:

In the full-entry model information is stored redundantly at all relevant levels in the taxonomy, which means that it operates, if at all, with minimal generalization.

2112: 1016:

purposes and takes into account cross-linguistic factors. It deals mainly with the internal structure of constructions. Radical construction grammar is totally non-

1942:

Michaelis, L. A., & Ruppenhofer, J. 2001. Beyond alternations: A constructional account of the applicative pattern in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

1113:

frameworks but interest in construction grammar has been shown by more traditional computational linguists as a contrast to the current boom in more opaque

1160:

linguistics, has been considered misleading. German philologist Elisabeth Leiss regards construction grammar as regress, linking it with the 19th century

2503:

Bergen, Benjamin and Nancy Chang. Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding. In press. J.-O. Östman and M. Fried (eds.).

1951:

Boas, H.C. and Sag, I.A. eds., 2012. Sign-based construction grammar (pp. xvi+-391). CSLI Publications/Center for the Study of Language and Information.

2603:

Steels, Luc and De Beule, Joachim (2006). Unify and merge in fluid construction grammars. In: Vogt, P., Sugita, Y., Tuci, E. and Nehaniv, C., editors,

1129:, who defends humanistic linguistics and opposes Darwinian linguistics, questions the originality of the work of Adele Goldberg, Michael Tomasello, 1810:

Kay, Paul and Michaelis, Laura A. (2012). Constructional Meaning and Compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds.),

1057:

and George Lakoff, and so ECG aligns itself with cognitive linguistics. Like construction grammar, embodied construction grammar makes use of a

521:, or learned pairings of linguistic patterns with meanings, are the fundamental building blocks of human language. Constructions include words ( 1632: 1502: 1471: 1289: 493: 1109:

Most of the above approaches to construction grammar have not been implemented as a computational model for large scale practical usage in

947: 383: 2579:

Michaelis, Laura A. and Knud Lambrecht (1996). Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition.

913:

Because construction grammar does not operate with surface derivations from underlying structures, it adheres to functionalist linguist

980:

cognitive linguistics. In the Goldbergian strand, constructions interact with each other in a network via four inheritance relations:

1910: 2347: 2271: 2201: 1661: 1433: 1405: 1256: 633: 2533:

Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay and Catherine O'Connor (1988). Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of

691: 1933:

Fillmore, Charles J. and Paul Kay. 1995. A Construction Grammar Coursebook. Unpublished ms, University of California, Berkeley.

844:

networks of families of constructions, which are based on the same principles as those of the conceptual categories known from

671:. Construction grammarians point out that this is not merely a fixed phrase; the Correlative Conditional is a general pattern ( 343: 31: 975:

The type of construction grammar associated with linguists like Goldberg and Lakoff looks mainly at the external relations of

637:. It argued that the meaning of the whole was not a function of the meanings of the parts, that odd grammatical properties of 121: 2657: 1602: 1272:

Croft, William (2006). "The relevance of an evolutionary model to historical linguistics". In Nedergaard Thomsen, Ole (ed.).

403: 348: 2139: 2483:

Sethuraman, Nitya and Goodman, Judith C. (2004). Children's mastery of the transitive construction. In E. V. Clark (ed),

600:. Construction grammar is associated with concepts from cognitive linguistics that aim to show in various ways how human 378: 69: 1678: 323: 189: 2667: 1110: 589: 443: 149: 1098: 1073: 1346: 2593:

Michaelis, Laura A. (2004). Type Shifting in Construction Grammar: An Integrated Approach to Aspectual Coercion.

1197:

the direct object term in VO, and 'recipient in transfer of possession of object' for the indirect-object in VI.

1085: 922: 812:

Unlike the componential model, construction grammar denies any strict distinction between the two and proposes a

655: 486: 433: 333: 159: 1960:

Michaelis, L.A., 2009. Sign-based construction grammar. The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, pp.155-176.

1618: 1156:

At the same time, the claim made by construction grammarians, that their research represents a continuation of

1054: 976: 821: 735: 719: 338: 281: 96: 1825: 1396:

MacWhinney, Brian (2015). "Introduction – language emergence". In MacWhinney, Brian; O'Grady, William (eds.).

1093:

premise that language users constantly change and update their grammars. The research on FCG is conducted at

929:

same proposition are not synonymous, but display differences in content: in this case the pragmatic content.

1216: 438: 276: 253: 2194:

Analogy as Structure and Process. Approaches in linguistics, cognitive psychology and philosophy of science

1775: 1711: 1211: 1142: 388: 355: 308: 224: 204: 184: 86: 64: 59: 2662: 1157: 845: 731: 554: 514: 164: 1450: 1058: 1046: 1449:

Kirby, Simon (2013). "Transitions: the evolution of linguistic replicators". In Binder; Smith (eds.).

2607:, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS/LNAI) Vol. 4211, Berlin. Springer-Verlag. pp. 197–223. 749:

The semantic meaning of a grammatical construction is made up of conceptual structures postulated in

479: 408: 199: 144: 41: 2388:

Kibrik, Alexander E. (1997). Beyond subject and object: toward a comprehensive relational typology.

1780: 1716: 1042: 1013: 873: 750: 702: 617: 249: 179: 154: 126: 722:

is a pairing of form and content. The formal aspect of a construction is typically described as a

465: 2470:

Taylor, John R. (1998). Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In M. Tomasello, (ed),

2238: 2131: 1988: 1856: 1729: 1535: 1369: 1173: 1146: 1038: 841: 825: 777: 651: 631:

Another early study was "There-Constructions," which appeared as Case Study 3 in George Lakoff's

469: 448: 418: 373: 328: 296: 286: 174: 169: 2288: 851:

Four different models are proposed in relation to how information is stored in the taxonomies:

2652: 2343: 2311: 2267: 2197: 1920: 1909:

Hoffmann, Thomas; Trousdale, Graeme (2013-04-18). Hoffmann, Thomas; Trousdale, Graeme (eds.).

1848: 1793: 1657: 1628: 1598: 1498: 1467: 1429: 1401: 1347:"Complex Adaptive Systems and the Origins of Adaptive Structure: What Experiments Can Tell Us" 1285: 1252: 1165: 1130: 1089: 993: 817: 698: 573: 562: 313: 291: 234: 2218: 1875: 2303: 2230: 2123: 1916: 1840: 1785: 1721: 1569: 1527: 1459: 1361: 1321: 1277: 1161: 1009: 772: 765: 413: 244: 239: 214: 209: 194: 2588:

Beyond Alternations: A Construction-Based Account of the Applicative Construction in German

2164: 1306: 1181: 1150: 951: 914: 2472:

The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure

1980: 1276:. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Vol. 279. John Benjamins. pp. 91–132. 998: 258: 1844: 832:(these are the traditional terms; construction grammars use a different terminology). 2646: 2362:

Andrews, Avery D. (1985). The major functions of the noun phrase. In T. Shopen (ed),

2242: 2135: 1650: 1595:

Philosophy in the Flesh : the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought

1539: 1365: 1325: 1114: 625: 2485:

Online proceedings of the 32nd session of the Stanford Child Language Research Forum

1860: 1733: 1373: 17: 1050: 1017: 781: 758: 754: 683: 301: 91: 2085: 1045:

experiences. A central claim is that the content of all linguistic signs involves

1622: 1246: 2427:

Givón, Talmy (1997). Grammatical relations: an introduction. In T. Givón (ed),

1766:

Michaelis, Laura A. (1994-01-01). "A Case of Constructional Polysemy in Latin".

1463: 1189: 1126: 701:

for all languages, construction grammar holds that speakers learn constructions

601: 585: 453: 428: 49: 2127: 784:

schema is said to express semantic content X CAUSES Y TO RECEIVE Z, just like

780:

schemata, are pairings of form and conventionalized meaning. For instance, the

2307: 1573: 1198: 1077: 743: 682:

Construction grammar rejects the idea that there is a sharp dichotomy between

605: 423: 106: 1797: 1221: 1177: 848:, such as inheritance, prototypicality, extensions, and multiple parenting. 739: 727: 715: 398: 393: 229: 219: 111: 101: 2315: 1852: 1281: 1001:

classes are semantically motivated and involve certain conceptualizations.

616:

Construction grammar was first developed in the 1980s by linguists such as

2234: 1789: 1725: 1495:

Competition in Language Change: the Rise of the English Dative Alternation

1021: 2513:

Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective

1624:

Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective

1531: 1169: 981: 955: 801: 726:

template, but the form covers more than just syntax, as it also involves

675:) with "slots" that can be filled by almost any comparative phrase (e.g. 621: 597: 530: 2567:

Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind

1652:

Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind

1168:. There is a dispute between the advocates of construction grammar and 984:

link, subpart link, metaphorical extension, and finally instance link.

829: 764:

The form and content are symbolically linked in the sense advocated by

638: 577: 2617: 2364:

Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1: Clause structure

1032:

Embodied construction grammar (ECG), which is being developed by the

723: 116: 2546:

Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure

1896:

Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure

1033: 2637: 2055: 1557: 793: 542: 2455:

Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language.

1518:

Peschek, Ilka (2010). "Die Konstruktion als kulturelle Einheit".

840:

In construction grammar, the grammar of a language is made up of

2505:

Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-Language Dimensions

1812:

Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning

1747:

Fillmore, Charles (1986). "Varieties of Conditional Sentences".

950:. Its proponents/developers include Charles Fillmore, Paul Kay, 797: 593: 581: 2553:

Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language

1248:

Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language

1176:

to cultural evolution while construction grammar rejects human

654:-based methodologies of constructional analysis (for example, 2056:"High-dimensional distributed semantic spaces for utterances" 27:

Family of theories within the field of cognitive linguistics

1274:

Competing Models of Linguistic Change: Evolution and Beyond

2622: 694:). All of these patterns are recognized as constructions. 2632: 1081: 1458:. The Frontiers Collection. Springer. pp. 121–138. 1184:, this makes construction grammar the same as memetics. 2528:

From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language

2453:

Ariel, Mira (2008). A review of A. E. Goldberg (2006).

1826:"Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language" 1345:

Cornish, Hannah; Tamariz, Monica; Kirby, Simon (2009).

1307:"Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper" 1180:

in language construction; but, according to memetician

2627: 2474:(pp. 177-202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (p. 187) 1702:

Sag, Ivan (2010). "English Filler-Gap Constructions".

1063:

From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language

30:

For the TV show also sometimes abbreviated "CXG", see

1094: 2440:

Jackendoff, Ray S. (1997). Twistin' the night away.

2414:

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy (1997).

2366:(pp. 62 154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2219:"Saussurean structuralism and cognitive linguistics" 2090:

Georgetown University 2023 Roundtable on Linguistics

1251:. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 5–10. 677:

The more you think about it, the less you understand

2560:

Construction Grammar and its Application to English

1873:Dufter, Andreas, and Stark, Elisabeth (eds., 2017) 1426:

The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity

2586:Michaelis, Laura A. and Josef Ruppenhofer (2001). 2429:Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective 2026:Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar 1649: 580:or the formation of natural constructions such as 1627:. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 15. 1551: 1549: 1391: 1389: 2431:(pp. 1 84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (pp. 2-3) 1012:'s radical construction grammar is designed for 792:are constructions, including phrase structures, 761:-Lakoff performative hypothesis from the 1960s. 2487:(pp. 60-67). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 2405:Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p. 439) 1889: 1887: 1885: 1080:and his collaborators for doing experiments on 2576:. 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2287:Christiansen, Morten H.; Chater, Nick (2008). 1898:. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 1240: 1238: 1236: 645:Fillmore et al.'s (1988) paper on the English 553:), and abstract grammatical rules such as the 513:) is a family of theories within the field of 2488: 2011:Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar 1679:"Introducing Sign Based Construction Grammar" 697:In contrast to theories that posit an innate 487: 8: 2519:Croft, William A. and D. Alan Cruse (2004). 2333: 2331: 2340:Syntactic development, its input and output 1419: 1417: 1677:Boas, Hans, Ivan Sag and Paul Kay (2012). 669:The bigger they come, the harder they fall 494: 480: 36: 2377:The theory of functional grammar, Part 1. 2054:Karlgren, Jussi; Kanerva, Pentti (2019). 2039:Steels, Luc; Hild, Manfred, eds. (2012). 1876:Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax 1779: 1715: 1520:Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 971:Goldbergian/Lakovian construction grammar 2562:. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2523:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2416:Syntax: structure, meaning and function. 2403:Introduction to theoretical linguistics. 1981:"Trees, Assemblies, Chains, and Windows" 1749:Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1656:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 836:Grammar as an inventory of constructions 608:behaviour is automatic and not planned. 2548:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1921:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0001 1814:. Vol. 3. Berlin: de Gruyter. 2271-2296 1232: 714:In construction grammar, as in general 48: 2628:VUB Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 2418:Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1593:Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark (1999). 771:Thus a construction is treated like a 1082:the origins and evolution of language 1049:and is ultimately dependent on basic 7: 1879:, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG 948:head-driven phrase structure grammar 384:Conservative and innovative language 2342:. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2555:. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2516:. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2165:"Konstruktiokielioppi ja analogia" 872:The usage-based model is based on 25: 2457:Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2289:"Language as shaped by the brain" 690:), to fully abstract rules (e.g. 634:Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things 2574:Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 2572:Langacker, Ronald (1987, 1991). 2223:Histoire épistemologique langage 1979:Langacker, Ronald (2016-10-05). 1558:"Memes shape brains shape memes" 1366:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00540.x 1326:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x 1141:, respectively, in the works of 1105:Implemented construction grammar 464: 1991:from the original on 2021-12-12 1034:Neural Theory of Language (NTL) 962:Sign Based Construction Grammar 32:Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (TV series) 2590:. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 1398:Handbook of Language Emergence 992:Sometimes, Ronald Langacker's 588:. Constructions correspond to 1: 2530:. Cambridge : MIT Press. 2296:Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1845:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 1562:Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1028:Embodied construction grammar 941:Berkeley Construction Grammar 2060:Natural Language Engineering 2041:Language Grounding in Robots 2013:. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1833:Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1005:Radical construction grammar 324:Functional discourse grammar 190:Ethnography of communication 2526:Feldman, Jerome A. (2006). 1824:Goldberg, Adele E. (2003). 1464:10.1007/978-3-642-36086-2_6 1111:Natural Language Processing 692:subject–auxiliary inversion 444:Second-language acquisition 2684: 2623:Fluid Construction Grammar 2510:Croft, William A. (2001). 2379:Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 2128:10.55245/energeia.2011.001 1099:Vrije Universiteit Brussel 1074:Fluid construction grammar 1069:Fluid construction grammar 954:, and to a certain extent 933:Some construction grammars 897:Complete inheritance model 122:Syntax–semantics interface 29: 2308:10.1017/S0140525X08004998 2262:Leiss, Elisabeth (2009). 2024:Steels, Luc, ed. (2012). 2009:Steels, Luc, ed. (2011). 1574:10.1017/S0140525X08005037 1556:Blackmore, Susan (2008). 1086:computational linguistics 1053:of the kind advocated by 884:Default inheritance model 788:means X CAUSES Y TO DIE. 656:collostructional analysis 541:), fixed expressions and 434:Philosophy of linguistics 334:Interactional linguistics 2558:Hilpert, Martin (2014). 2551:Goldberg, Adele (2006). 2544:Goldberg, Adele. (1995) 2390:Linguistic Typology, 13, 2171:(in Finnish) (4): 81–117 1894:Goldberg, Adele (1995). 1400:. Wiley. pp. 1–31. 1245:Goldberg, Adele (2006). 925:elaborates in her book. 919:principle of no synonymy 909:Principle of no synonymy 814:syntax–lexicon continuum 808:Syntax–lexicon continuum 720:grammatical construction 710:Grammatical construction 559:The cat was hit by a car 2565:Lakoff, George (1987). 2092:. Georgetown University 2086:"Workshop on CxG + NLP" 2028:. Heidelberg: Springer. 1648:Lakoff, George (1987). 1493:Zehentner, Eva (2019). 1452:The Language Phenomenon 1217:Construction Morphology 997:grammatical units like 818:subcategorization frame 567:Mary gave Alex the ball 2491:csli.stanford.edu/pubs 2375:Dik, Simon C. (1997). 1282:10.1075/cilt.279.08cro 1212:Anankastic conditional 1143:William Dwight Whitney 1097:and the AI Lab at the 1076:(FCG) was designed by 271:Theoretical frameworks 225:Philosophy of language 205:History of linguistics 2658:Cognitive linguistics 2595:Cognitive Linguistics 2521:Cognitive Linguistics 2235:10.3406/hel.2012.3235 2217:Elffers, Els (2012). 2192:Itkonen, Esa (2005). 2163:Itkonen, Esa (2011). 2113:"On Coseriu's legacy" 2111:Itkonen, Esa (2011). 2043:. New York: Springer. 1790:10.1075/sl.18.1.04mic 1726:10.1353/lan.2010.0002 1497:. De Gruyter Mouton. 846:cognitive linguistics 738:. The content covers 706:different languages. 515:cognitive linguistics 165:Conversation analysis 2618:Construction Grammar 2401:Lyons, John (1968). 2338:Ninio, Anat (2011). 1912:Construction Grammar 1532:10.1515/ZGL.2010.031 1424:Dahl, Östen (2004). 507:Construction grammar 409:Internet linguistics 319:Construction grammar 18:Construction Grammar 1987:. FrameNet Brazil. 1768:Studies in Language 1065:(MIT Press, 2006). 751:cognitive semantics 509:(often abbreviated 344:Systemic functional 139:Applied linguistics 81:General linguistics 2668:Grammar frameworks 2507:. Johns Benjamins. 2196:. John Benjamins. 1428:. John Benjamins. 1193:minor patterns. 1174:intelligent design 1147:Leonard Bloomfield 1090:feature structures 1047:mental simulations 874:inductive learning 826:syntactic category 778:argument structure 449:Theory of language 419:Origin of language 374:Autonomy of syntax 329:Grammaticalization 175:Discourse analysis 170:Corpus linguistics 2264:Sprachphilosophie 1634:978-0-19-829954-7 1504:978-3-11-063385-6 1473:978-3-642-36085-5 1354:Language Learning 1314:Language Learning 1291:978-90-272-4794-0 1166:August Schleicher 1131:Gilles Fauconnier 1059:unification-based 994:cognitive grammar 988:Cognitive grammar 868:Usage-based model 730:aspects, such as 699:universal grammar 574:natural selection 517:which posit that 504: 503: 292:Distributionalism 235:Psycholinguistics 16:(Redirected from 2675: 2569:. Chicago: CSLI. 2492: 2481: 2475: 2468: 2462: 2451: 2445: 2438: 2432: 2425: 2419: 2412: 2406: 2399: 2393: 2386: 2380: 2373: 2367: 2360: 2354: 2353: 2335: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2322: 2293: 2284: 2278: 2277: 2259: 2253: 2252: 2250: 2249: 2214: 2208: 2207: 2189: 2183: 2182: 2177: 2176: 2160: 2154: 2153: 2151: 2150: 2144: 2138:. Archived from 2117: 2108: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2097: 2082: 2076: 2075: 2073: 2071: 2051: 2045: 2044: 2036: 2030: 2029: 2021: 2015: 2014: 2006: 2000: 1999: 1997: 1996: 1976: 1970: 1967: 1961: 1958: 1952: 1949: 1943: 1940: 1934: 1931: 1925: 1924: 1906: 1900: 1899: 1891: 1880: 1871: 1865: 1864: 1830: 1821: 1815: 1808: 1802: 1801: 1783: 1763: 1757: 1756: 1744: 1738: 1737: 1719: 1699: 1693: 1692: 1690: 1689: 1683: 1674: 1668: 1667: 1655: 1645: 1639: 1638: 1615: 1609: 1608: 1590: 1584: 1583: 1581: 1580: 1553: 1544: 1543: 1515: 1509: 1508: 1490: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1480: 1457: 1446: 1440: 1439: 1421: 1412: 1411: 1393: 1384: 1383: 1381: 1380: 1351: 1342: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1311: 1302: 1296: 1295: 1269: 1263: 1262: 1242: 1162:social darwinism 1010:William A. Croft 856:Full-entry model 820:> idiom > 673:The Xer, the Yer 618:Charles Fillmore 496: 489: 482: 468: 414:LGBT linguistics 404:Internationalism 379:Compositionality 240:Sociolinguistics 215:Neurolinguistics 210:Interlinguistics 195:Ethnomethodology 37: 21: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2643: 2642: 2614: 2500: 2498:Further reading 2495: 2482: 2478: 2469: 2465: 2452: 2448: 2439: 2435: 2426: 2422: 2413: 2409: 2400: 2396: 2387: 2383: 2374: 2370: 2361: 2357: 2350: 2337: 2336: 2329: 2320: 2318: 2291: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2274: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2247: 2245: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2204: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2174: 2172: 2162: 2161: 2157: 2148: 2146: 2142: 2115: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2095: 2093: 2084: 2083: 2079: 2069: 2067: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1994: 1992: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1950: 1946: 1941: 1937: 1932: 1928: 1915:. Vol. 1. 1908: 1907: 1903: 1893: 1892: 1883: 1872: 1868: 1828: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1809: 1805: 1781:10.1.1.353.1125 1765: 1764: 1760: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1717:10.1.1.138.2274 1701: 1700: 1696: 1687: 1685: 1681: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1664: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1635: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1605: 1597:. Basic Books. 1592: 1591: 1587: 1578: 1576: 1555: 1554: 1547: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1505: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1478: 1476: 1474: 1455: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1436: 1423: 1422: 1415: 1408: 1395: 1394: 1387: 1378: 1376: 1349: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1330: 1328: 1309: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1292: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1259: 1244: 1243: 1234: 1230: 1208: 1182:Susan Blackmore 1151:Charles Hockett 1124: 1107: 1071: 1030: 1007: 990: 973: 964: 952:Laura Michaelis 943: 935: 915:Dwight Bolinger 911: 838: 810: 712: 664: 614: 500: 459: 458: 369: 361: 360: 272: 264: 263: 259:Writing systems 150:Anthropological 140: 132: 131: 82: 74: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2681: 2679: 2671: 2670: 2665: 2660: 2655: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2635: 2633:Sony CSL Paris 2630: 2625: 2620: 2613: 2612:External links 2610: 2609: 2608: 2601: 2598: 2591: 2584: 2577: 2570: 2563: 2556: 2549: 2542: 2531: 2524: 2517: 2508: 2499: 2496: 2494: 2493: 2476: 2463: 2446: 2433: 2420: 2407: 2394: 2381: 2368: 2355: 2348: 2327: 2302:(5): 489–558. 2279: 2272: 2266:. De Gruyter. 2254: 2209: 2202: 2184: 2155: 2103: 2077: 2046: 2031: 2016: 2001: 1971: 1962: 1953: 1944: 1935: 1926: 1901: 1881: 1866: 1839:(5): 219–224. 1816: 1803: 1758: 1739: 1710:(3): 486–545. 1694: 1669: 1662: 1640: 1633: 1619:Croft, William 1610: 1603: 1585: 1545: 1526:(3): 451–457. 1510: 1503: 1485: 1472: 1441: 1434: 1413: 1406: 1385: 1360:(1): 187–205. 1337: 1297: 1290: 1264: 1257: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1207: 1204: 1153:, and others. 1123: 1120: 1106: 1103: 1095:Sony CSL Paris 1070: 1067: 1029: 1026: 1006: 1003: 999:part-of-speech 989: 986: 972: 969: 963: 960: 942: 939: 934: 931: 923:Adele Goldberg 910: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 894: 893: 892: 890: 881: 880: 879: 877: 865: 864: 863: 861: 837: 834: 809: 806: 711: 708: 663: 660: 613: 610: 586:social insects 551:jog X's memory 502: 501: 499: 498: 491: 484: 476: 473: 472: 461: 460: 457: 456: 451: 446: 441: 439:Prescriptivism 436: 431: 426: 421: 416: 411: 406: 401: 396: 391: 386: 381: 376: 370: 367: 366: 363: 362: 359: 358: 353: 352: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 326: 321: 316: 306: 305: 304: 299: 294: 289: 284: 273: 270: 269: 266: 265: 262: 261: 256: 247: 242: 237: 232: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 177: 172: 167: 162: 157: 152: 147: 141: 138: 137: 134: 133: 130: 129: 124: 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 83: 80: 79: 76: 75: 73: 72: 67: 62: 56: 53: 52: 46: 45: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2680: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2648: 2639: 2636: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2621: 2619: 2616: 2615: 2611: 2606: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2592: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2578: 2575: 2571: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2557: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2522: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2490: 2486: 2480: 2477: 2473: 2467: 2464: 2460: 2459:Language, 84, 2456: 2450: 2447: 2443: 2442:Language, 73, 2437: 2434: 2430: 2424: 2421: 2417: 2411: 2408: 2404: 2398: 2395: 2391: 2385: 2382: 2378: 2372: 2369: 2365: 2359: 2356: 2351: 2349:9780199565962 2345: 2341: 2334: 2332: 2328: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2290: 2283: 2280: 2275: 2273:9783110217001 2269: 2265: 2258: 2255: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2213: 2210: 2205: 2203:9789027294012 2199: 2195: 2188: 2185: 2181: 2170: 2166: 2159: 2156: 2145:on 2020-01-14 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2122:(III): 1–29. 2121: 2114: 2107: 2104: 2091: 2087: 2081: 2078: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2050: 2047: 2042: 2035: 2032: 2027: 2020: 2017: 2012: 2005: 2002: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1975: 1972: 1966: 1963: 1957: 1954: 1948: 1945: 1939: 1936: 1930: 1927: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1905: 1902: 1897: 1890: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1870: 1867: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1827: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1807: 1804: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1762: 1759: 1754: 1750: 1743: 1740: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1718: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1698: 1695: 1680: 1673: 1670: 1665: 1663:9780226468037 1659: 1654: 1653: 1644: 1641: 1636: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1620: 1614: 1611: 1606: 1600: 1596: 1589: 1586: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1514: 1511: 1506: 1500: 1496: 1489: 1486: 1475: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1454: 1453: 1445: 1442: 1437: 1435:9781588115546 1431: 1427: 1420: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1407:9781118346136 1403: 1399: 1392: 1390: 1386: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1348: 1341: 1338: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1308: 1301: 1298: 1293: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1268: 1265: 1260: 1258:0-19-9-268525 1254: 1250: 1249: 1241: 1239: 1237: 1233: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1194: 1191: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1154: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1115:deep learning 1112: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051:image schemas 1048: 1044: 1040: 1035: 1027: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1004: 1002: 1000: 995: 987: 985: 983: 978: 977:constructions 970: 968: 961: 959: 957: 953: 949: 940: 938: 932: 930: 926: 924: 920: 916: 908: 900: 899: 898: 895: 891: 887: 886: 885: 882: 878: 875: 871: 870: 869: 866: 862: 859: 858: 857: 854: 853: 852: 849: 847: 843: 835: 833: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 807: 805: 803: 799: 795: 789: 787: 783: 779: 774: 769: 767: 762: 760: 756: 755:image-schemas 752: 747: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 709: 707: 704: 700: 695: 693: 689: 688:drive X crazy 685: 684:lexical items 680: 678: 674: 670: 661: 659: 657: 653: 648: 643: 640: 636: 635: 629: 627: 626:George Lakoff 623: 619: 611: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 570: 568: 564: 560: 556: 555:passive voice 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 519:constructions 516: 512: 508: 497: 492: 490: 485: 483: 478: 477: 475: 474: 471: 467: 463: 462: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 435: 432: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 389:Descriptivism 387: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 371: 365: 364: 357: 356:Structuralism 354: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 339:Prague circle 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 311: 310: 307: 303: 300: 298: 295: 293: 290: 288: 285: 283: 280: 279: 278: 275: 274: 268: 267: 260: 257: 255: 251: 248: 246: 243: 241: 238: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 188: 186: 185:Documentation 183: 181: 178: 176: 173: 171: 168: 166: 163: 161: 160:Computational 158: 156: 153: 151: 148: 146: 143: 142: 136: 135: 128: 125: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 78: 77: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 43: 39: 38: 33: 19: 2663:Sociobiology 2604: 2594: 2587: 2583:72: 215–247. 2580: 2573: 2566: 2559: 2552: 2545: 2538: 2534: 2527: 2520: 2511: 2504: 2484: 2479: 2471: 2466: 2458: 2454: 2449: 2441: 2436: 2428: 2423: 2415: 2410: 2402: 2397: 2389: 2384: 2376: 2371: 2363: 2358: 2339: 2319:. Retrieved 2299: 2295: 2282: 2263: 2257: 2246:. Retrieved 2229:(1): 19–40. 2226: 2222: 2212: 2193: 2187: 2179: 2173:. Retrieved 2168: 2158: 2147:. Retrieved 2140:the original 2119: 2106: 2096:28 September 2094:. Retrieved 2089: 2080: 2070:28 September 2068:. Retrieved 2063: 2059: 2049: 2040: 2034: 2025: 2019: 2010: 2004: 1993:. Retrieved 1984: 1974: 1965: 1956: 1947: 1938: 1929: 1911: 1904: 1895: 1874: 1869: 1836: 1832: 1819: 1811: 1806: 1774:(1): 45–70. 1771: 1767: 1761: 1752: 1748: 1742: 1707: 1703: 1697: 1686:. Retrieved 1684:. p. 19 1672: 1651: 1643: 1623: 1613: 1594: 1588: 1577:. Retrieved 1565: 1561: 1523: 1519: 1513: 1494: 1488: 1477:. Retrieved 1451: 1444: 1425: 1397: 1377:. Retrieved 1357: 1353: 1340: 1329:. Retrieved 1317: 1313: 1300: 1273: 1267: 1247: 1195: 1186: 1155: 1138: 1134: 1125: 1108: 1072: 1062: 1055:Mark Johnson 1043:sensorimotor 1031: 1018:reductionist 1008: 991: 974: 965: 944: 936: 927: 918: 912: 896: 883: 867: 855: 850: 839: 813: 811: 790: 785: 782:ditransitive 770: 763: 748: 728:phonological 713: 696: 687: 681: 676: 672: 668: 665: 646: 644: 632: 630: 615: 571: 566: 563:ditransitive 558: 550: 547:by and large 546: 538: 534: 526: 522: 518: 510: 506: 505: 318: 302:Glossematics 282:Constituency 254:interpreting 92:Lexicography 2638:NTL Project 2541:64: 501–38. 1320:(1): 1–26. 1190:Talmy Givon 1127:Esa Itkonen 1014:typological 921:, on which 742:as well as 703:inductively 650:of several 590:replicators 454:Terminology 429:Orthography 349:Usage-based 250:Translating 145:Acquisition 50:Linguistics 2647:Categories 2489:http://www 2321:2020-12-22 2248:2020-06-29 2175:2020-06-29 2149:2020-01-14 1995:2021-05-07 1755:: 163–182. 1688:2019-09-14 1604:0465056733 1579:2020-12-22 1568:(5): 513. 1479:2020-03-04 1379:2020-06-30 1331:2020-03-04 1228:References 1199:Anat Ninio 1158:Saussurean 1078:Luc Steels 1039:embodiment 828:> word/ 822:morphology 736:intonation 424:Orismology 309:Functional 297:Generative 287:Dependency 107:Pragmatics 97:Morphology 87:Diachronic 2597:15: 1–67. 2535:let alone 2243:170602847 2169:Virittäjä 2136:247142924 1798:0378-4177 1776:CiteSeerX 1712:CiteSeerX 1540:143951283 1222:Snowclone 1178:free will 1122:Criticism 902:networks. 842:taxonomic 802:morphemes 800:and even 766:Langacker 746:meaning. 744:pragmatic 724:syntactic 716:semiotics 647:let alone 561:) or the 531:morphemes 399:Iconicity 394:Etymology 314:Cognitive 277:Formalist 230:Phonetics 220:Philology 112:Semantics 102:Phonology 2653:Memetics 2581:Language 2539:Language 2461:632 636. 2444:534 559. 2392:279 346. 2316:18826669 2120:Energeia 1989:Archived 1861:12393863 1853:12757824 1734:14934876 1704:Language 1621:(2001). 1374:56199987 1206:See also 1170:memetics 1088:such as 1022:Gestalts 982:polysemy 956:Ivan Sag 740:semantic 662:Concepts 622:Paul Kay 606:creative 602:rational 598:memetics 584:made by 523:aardvark 200:Forensic 180:Distance 127:Typology 42:a series 40:Part of 1985:YouTube 1135:analogy 830:lexicon 732:prosody 639:Deictic 612:History 578:species 527:avocado 155:Applied 65:History 60:Outline 2346: 2314: 2270: 2241: 2200: 2134: 1859: 1851: 1796: 1778: 1732: 1714: 1660: 1631: 1601: 1538: 1501: 1470: 1432: 1404: 1372: 1288: 1255: 889:types. 824:> 794:idioms 718:, the 652:corpus 624:, and 543:idioms 470:Portal 368:Topics 117:Syntax 2292:(PDF) 2239:S2CID 2143:(PDF) 2132:S2CID 2116:(PDF) 1857:S2CID 1829:(PDF) 1730:S2CID 1682:(PDF) 1536:S2CID 1456:(PDF) 1370:S2CID 1350:(PDF) 1310:(PDF) 1139:blend 798:words 594:memes 582:nests 535:anti- 70:Index 2344:ISBN 2312:PMID 2268:ISBN 2198:ISBN 2098:2023 2072:2023 1849:PMID 1794:ISSN 1658:ISBN 1629:ISBN 1599:ISBN 1499:ISBN 1468:ISBN 1430:ISBN 1402:ISBN 1286:ISBN 1253:ISBN 1137:and 1041:and 786:kill 773:sign 759:Ross 734:and 604:and 539:-ing 252:and 245:Text 2304:doi 2231:doi 2124:doi 2066:(4) 1917:doi 1841:doi 1786:doi 1722:doi 1570:doi 1528:doi 1460:doi 1362:doi 1322:doi 1278:doi 1164:of 917:'s 658:). 592:or 576:in 529:), 511:CxG 2649:: 2537:. 2330:^ 2310:. 2300:31 2298:. 2294:. 2237:. 2227:34 2225:. 2221:. 2178:. 2167:. 2130:. 2118:. 2088:. 2064:25 2062:. 2058:. 1983:. 1884:^ 1855:. 1847:. 1835:. 1831:. 1792:. 1784:. 1772:18 1770:. 1751:. 1728:. 1720:. 1708:86 1706:. 1566:31 1564:. 1560:. 1548:^ 1534:. 1524:38 1522:. 1466:. 1416:^ 1388:^ 1368:. 1358:59 1356:. 1352:. 1318:59 1316:. 1312:. 1284:. 1235:^ 1149:, 1145:, 1101:. 804:. 796:, 768:. 753:: 620:, 549:, 537:, 525:, 44:on 2352:. 2324:. 2306:: 2276:. 2251:. 2233:: 2206:. 2152:. 2126:: 2100:. 2074:. 1998:. 1923:. 1919:: 1863:. 1843:: 1837:7 1800:. 1788:: 1753:3 1736:. 1724:: 1691:. 1666:. 1637:. 1607:. 1582:. 1572:: 1542:. 1530:: 1507:. 1482:. 1462:: 1438:. 1410:. 1382:. 1364:: 1334:. 1324:: 1294:. 1280:: 1261:. 565:( 557:( 545:( 533:( 495:e 488:t 481:v 34:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.