Knowledge (XXG)

Control self-assessment

Source 📝

775: 930:
would have catastrophic consequences if it occurred. These risks should have a high overall risk score (generally calculated as a product of the probability of a risk occurring and the impact if it does occur on a scale of 1 to 5). Individuals performing the control self-assessment are consequently unable to significantly differentiate between risks leading to extreme low probability risks either being excluded from the analysis or grouped together with other more probable (but still unlikely) risks that have a less severe impact.
754:. This report has to include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls and procedures that are related to financial reporting. To meet this requirement organisations increasingly began to perform a control self-assessment using a recognised standard methodology. The organisation's external auditors, who are required to sign-off the internal control report, typically became more deeply involved in the control self-assessment process as it facilitated their later review of the internal control report. 818: 733:'s Central Financial Service developed a control self-assessment process. This first control self-assessment identified several areas for improvement in internal control across the Commission most notably the need to implement a more systematic approach to risk management. The outcome of this first self-assessment was the implementation of the requirement for every 40: 744:. In order to comply with section 404 of the Act the company had to perform a top down risk assessment which necessitated the production of an "internal control report" that affirmed "the responsibility of management for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting." 866:
requirements considered necessary for effective control of each IT process with the organisation. Assessment and evaluation of these components using the Management Guidelines component provides an assessment mechanism that generates a maturity model indicating if the organisation is meeting its control objectives.
716:
in 1992. In section 4, Reporting and Controls, Cadbury made a number of recommendations that led to the increased adoption of control self-assessment in the UK. In particular section 4.5 of the Code of Practice contained within the report required that the directors of a company should report on the
644:
that control self-assessments are performed on IT systems and operational processes on a regular basis. Benefits claimed for control self-assessment include creating a clear line of accountability for controls, reducing the risk of fraud and the creation of an organisation with a lower risk profile.
785:
The first step in control self-assessment is to document the organisation's control processes with the aim of identifying suitable ways of measuring or testing each control. The actual testing of the controls is performed by staff whose day-to-day role is within the area of the organisation that is
933:
The continual focus on risk elimination that a control self-assessment can lead to has also been criticised. The process of continual evaluation of risks and making plans to mitigate and eliminate them may lead to an unbalanced corporate culture where risks are eliminated ignoring the risk-return
929:
Some researchers have criticised control self-assessment as a flawed approach as the way risk is defined and measured is unsophisticated. In particular, control self-assessment may understate risk by not identifying extreme downside risk. An extreme downside risk is a highly improbable event that
648:
In certain circumstances control self-assessment is not always effective. For example, it can be difficult to implement in a decentralised environment, in organisations where there is high employee turnover, where the organisation goes through frequent change or where the senior management of the
857:
focused methodology suitable for assessing system based controls. It provides a cost-effective technique to determine the status of information security controls, identify any weaknesses and, where necessary, define an improvement plan. The methodology uses a questionnaire that contains specific
765:
recognised in its recommendations for the improvement of operational risk management that the assessment of risks through a control self-assessment may be an important means of identifying risks. It also noted that for the assessment to be fully effective it had to be fully integrated into the
865:
methodology can be used for control self-assessment; like the NIST methodology it was designed for IT focused assessments. COBIT's Process Description component provides a reference model of an organisation's processes and their ownership. Its Control Objectives component provides a set of
676:
Over the next ten years Gulf Canada developed a framework to support the analysis and evaluation of control processes by operational staff. This included anonymous voting to ensure there was no impediment to staff expressing their views. The approach was first published in
728:
approved a white paper on reform that led to a major change in the way the Commission was managed. These changes included recommendations for each department to establish an effective internal control system. To support the implementation of the internal controls the
916:
A number of other soft benefits have been claimed for organisations performing control self-assessment. These include a better understanding of business operations (by both management and operational staff); stronger awareness of risk practices; a reinforced
627:
of error. Since its introduction the technique has been widely adopted in the United States, European Union and other countries. There are a number of ways a control self-assessment can be implemented but its key feature is that, in contrast to a traditional
698:
Initially external auditors ignored the benefits of control self-assessment even though it was effective at providing audit evidence around the "soft" areas (such as staff morale) that are critical to the effectiveness of internal control systems.
686:
Following Gulf Canada's introduction of control self-assessment many private sector organisations implemented similar techniques. In the United States several states made reviews based on control self-assessment practices mandatory as did the
821:
A heatmap produced from the information captured in a control self-assessment. The cluster of issues in the red and amber sections of the heatmap indicate that this is a high risk area and probably in need of new or changed control
858:
control objectives and techniques against a system or group of systems can be tested and measured. The methodology was designed for United States federal agencies but can also be valuable for private sector organisations.
896:
A number of software packages are available to support the control self-assessment process. These are typically modified versions of software developed originally for internal use by audit and accountancy firms such as
632:, the tests and checks are made by staff whose normal day-to-day responsibilities are within the business unit being assessed. A self-assessment, by identifying the higher risk processes within the organisation, allows 804:
On completion of the assessment each control may be rated based on the responses received to determine the probability of its failure and the impact if a failure occurred. These ratings can be mapped to produce a
619:
is a technique developed in 1987 that is used by a range of organisations including corporations, charities and government departments, to assess the effectiveness of their risk management and control processes.
878: 888:
A number of other methodologies to standardise the control self-assessment have been published. The Institute of Internal Auditors offers a certification in control self-assessment practice.
1256: 673:
requiring the company to report on its internal controls and the difficulties it was facing in estimating its oil and gas reserves using more traditional audit measures.
683:
in December 1990. Gulf Canada discontinued this facilitated meeting approach in 1997 although it continued with control self-assessment using different techniques.
1375: 1405: 850: 1456: 960: 304: 1040: 1011: 289: 1282: 1477: 786:
being examined as they have the greatest knowledge of how the processes operate. The two common techniques for performing the evaluations are:
692: 688: 669:. The decision to fully implement control self-assessment at Gulf Canada was driven by a number of factors. These included the presence of a 294: 603: 454: 158: 55: 1105: 1260: 790:
Workshops, that may be but do not have to be independently facilitated, involving some or all staff from the business unit being tested;
309: 299: 65: 1301: 1147: 1015: 746: 361: 489: 366: 314: 257: 1336: 636:
to plan their work more effectively. A number of governmental organisations require the use of control self-assessment. In the
398: 1481: 1225: 1214: 1155: 964: 913:(by examining data that may flag unusual patterns of transactions) and results in an organisation with a lower risk profile. 870: 779: 730: 351: 1574: 1343: 762: 1193: 774: 1506: 1569: 874: 596: 403: 1579: 1044: 237: 113: 1019: 529: 464: 39: 1510: 854: 661:, Bruce McCuaig was dissatisfied with the standard auditing techniques in use following the impact of the 188: 1309: 658: 514: 252: 118: 60: 1290: 817: 1485: 918: 564: 103: 1534: 734: 725: 589: 554: 549: 524: 519: 459: 388: 346: 328: 281: 262: 193: 98: 23: 990: 909:
Control self-assessment creates a clear line of accountability for controls, reduces the risk of
741: 393: 228: 183: 1564: 1221: 1151: 574: 569: 148: 123: 948: 679: 633: 624: 356: 242: 1322: 444: 408: 198: 178: 163: 108: 93: 50: 710:
to chair an investigation into corporate governance. The committee published its report
1337:"Enhancing frameworks in the standardised approach to operational risk – Guidance note" 943: 758: 711: 707: 703: 670: 449: 417: 128: 1558: 1401: 1347: 718: 637: 559: 422: 341: 336: 173: 853:
control self-assessment methodology is based on customised questionnaires. It is an
750: 494: 233: 1231: 1134: 657:
Control self-assessment was developed by Gulf Canada in 1987 when the company's
380: 1257:"2nd Quality Conference for Public Administration in the EU: Note for the File" 484: 168: 31: 1136:
Professional Practice Pamphlet 98-2 A Perspective on Control Self-Assessment
901:
or by niche vendors specialising in business or financial management tools.
662: 1073: 898: 666: 1143: 826:
Six basic methodologies for control self-assessment have been defined:
806: 798: 267: 247: 153: 1535:"Companies Using Control Self Assessment Don't Really Know their Risk" 1074:"Control self-assessment:Everybody pitching in with internal controls" 883:
International Standards for Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
1106:"Control Self-Assessment:The Future of Store Audits in Retail Stores" 413: 88: 1402:"Security Self-assessment Guide for Information Technology Systems" 910: 862: 816: 773: 717:
effectiveness of the company's system of internal control in each
641: 629: 436: 218: 83: 706:'s publishing empire, the United Kingdom government commissioned 623:
A "control process" is a check or process performed to reduce or
1380:
Journal of the Information Systems Audit and Control Association
1376:"Control Self-assessment for Information and Related Technology" 1255:
Central Financial Service, European Commission (18 March 2002).
223: 793:
Surveys or questionnaires completed independently by the staff.
1457:"A comprehensive risk and control self-assessment methodology" 702:
After a number of financial scandals, notably the collapse of
649:
organisation does not foster a culture of open communication.
1181:(Second ed.). John Wiley & Sons Limited. p. 81. 1427:
Brink's Modern Internal Auditing: A Common Body of Knowledge
991:"The Use of Control Self-Assessment by Independent Auditors" 801:, not the business unit staff, will perform the assessment. 797:
Both approaches are the opposite of formal audits where the
1085: 1083: 885:
and was adopted by a large number of major organisations.
778:
Section 1 of the control self-assessment form used by the
1090:
Spencer Pickett, K.H. & Pickett, Jennifer M. (2010).
1442:
Operational Risk: Practical Approaches to Implementation
737:
to perform a control and risk self-assessment annually.
1094:(3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p. 585. 873:
based its control self-assessment methodology on the
1283:"Improving Internal and External Audit Coordination" 989:Gilbert W. Joseph; Terry J. Engle (December 2005). 921:regime and internal audit efficiency improvements. 766:financial organisation's risk-management process. 1478:"Certification in Control Self Assessment (CCSA)" 1533:Lee, Judy; Wee, Lieng-Seng (28 September 2005). 1455:Gene Álvarez; Phil Gledhill (24 November 2010). 1067: 1065: 1063: 1061: 830:Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ) self-audit 1406:National Institute of Standards and Technology 1129: 1127: 1125: 881:framework. The methodology became part of the 851:National Institute of Standards and Technology 713:The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance 597: 8: 1528: 1526: 1281:Engel, Terry J.; Joseph, Gilbert W. (2007). 984: 982: 980: 305:International Financial Reporting Standards 1194:"Use of control self-assessment in audits" 1012:"Control Self-assessment: An Introduction" 809:showing potential areas of vulnerability. 740:In 2007 the United States implemented the 604: 590: 18: 1215:Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance 16:Technique to assess process effectiveness 1369: 1367: 1179:The Essential Guide to Internal Auditing 1395: 1393: 1072:McNally, J.Stephen (12 November 2007). 976: 877:approaches of the 1990s as well as the 30: 1318: 1307: 770:Performing the control self-assessment 693:Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation 1429:. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Canada. 934:ratio of different business choices. 689:Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 295:Generally-accepted auditing standards 7: 1192:Joseph, Gilbert W (1 August 2001). 310:International Standards on Auditing 1302:The Institute of Internal Auditors 1148:The Institute of Internal Auditors 1016:The Institute of Internal Auditors 653:Development and worldwide adoption 14: 1289:(2). CSA Sentinel. Archived from 367:Notes to the financial statements 315:Management Accounting Principles 38: 1041:"FFIEC IT Examination Handbook" 1482:Institute of Internal Auditors 1346:. January 2011. Archived from 1092:The Internal Auditing Handbook 965:Federal Transit Administration 871:Institute of Internal Auditors 780:Federal Transit Administration 731:Directorate-General for Budget 665:affair on the parent company, 1: 1177:K.H. Spencer Pickett (2011). 1111:. Protivit Incorporated. 2006 290:Generally-accepted principles 1344:Financial Services Authority 961:Control self-assessment tool 763:Financial Services Authority 1220:(Report). 1 December 1992. 640:it is a requirement of the 1596: 1507:"Control Self Assessment" 833:Customised questionnaires 159:Constant purchasing power 56:Constant purchasing power 875:Total Quality Management 490:Accounting organizations 478:People and organizations 1425:Robert Moeller (2009). 1043:. FFIEC. Archived from 842:Control model workshops 617:Control self-assessment 238:Amortization (business) 1511:PriceWaterhouseCoopers 1440:Álvarez, Gene (2004). 1317:Cite journal requires 823: 782: 1374:Sunil Bakshi (2004). 845:Interactive workshops 820: 777: 362:Management discussion 1575:Corporate governance 1263:on 27 September 2006 919:corporate governance 839:Interview techniques 667:Gulf Oil Corporation 329:Financial statements 282:Accounting standards 735:Directorate General 726:European Commission 555:Earnings management 525:Positive accounting 399:Double-entry system 389:Bank reconciliation 194:Revenue recognition 1400:Marianne Swanson. 824: 783: 742:Sarbanes-Oxley Act 724:In March 2000 the 625:eliminate the risk 530:Sarbanes–Oxley Act 465:Sarbanes–Oxley Act 394:Debits and credits 229:Cost of goods sold 184:Matching principle 1196:. The CPA Journal 993:. The CPA Journal 634:internal auditors 614: 613: 575:Two sets of books 570:Off-balance-sheet 212:Selected accounts 149:Accounting period 1587: 1549: 1548: 1546: 1545: 1539: 1530: 1521: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1503: 1497: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1484:. Archived from 1474: 1468: 1467: 1465: 1464: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1437: 1431: 1430: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1413: 1412: 1397: 1388: 1387: 1371: 1362: 1361: 1359: 1358: 1352: 1341: 1333: 1327: 1326: 1320: 1315: 1313: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1278: 1272: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1259:. Archived from 1252: 1246: 1245: 1243: 1242: 1236: 1230:. Archived from 1219: 1211: 1205: 1204: 1202: 1201: 1189: 1183: 1182: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1165: 1164: 1141: 1131: 1120: 1119: 1117: 1116: 1110: 1102: 1096: 1095: 1087: 1078: 1077: 1076:. accountingweb. 1069: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1037: 1031: 1030: 1028: 1027: 1018:. Archived from 1008: 1002: 1001: 999: 998: 986: 949:Internal control 753: 680:Internal Auditor 606: 599: 592: 42: 19: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1570:Risk management 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1532: 1531: 1524: 1515: 1513: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1491: 1489: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1462: 1460: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1410: 1408: 1399: 1398: 1391: 1373: 1372: 1365: 1356: 1354: 1350: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1316: 1306: 1296: 1294: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1266: 1264: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1240: 1238: 1234: 1228: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1199: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1162: 1160: 1158: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1123: 1114: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1089: 1088: 1081: 1071: 1070: 1059: 1050: 1048: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1025: 1023: 1010: 1009: 1005: 996: 994: 988: 987: 978: 973: 957: 940: 927: 907: 894: 815: 772: 745: 659:General Auditor 655: 610: 581: 580: 579: 544: 536: 535: 534: 509: 501: 500: 499: 479: 471: 470: 469: 439: 429: 428: 427: 383: 373: 372: 371: 331: 321: 320: 319: 284: 274: 273: 272: 213: 205: 204: 203: 199:Unit of account 179:Historical cost 164:Economic entity 143: 135: 134: 133: 78: 70: 51:Historical cost 17: 12: 11: 5: 1593: 1591: 1583: 1582: 1580:Internal audit 1577: 1572: 1567: 1557: 1556: 1551: 1550: 1522: 1498: 1469: 1447: 1432: 1417: 1389: 1363: 1328: 1319:|journal= 1273: 1247: 1226: 1206: 1184: 1169: 1156: 1121: 1097: 1079: 1057: 1032: 1003: 975: 974: 972: 969: 968: 967: 956: 955:External links 953: 952: 951: 946: 944:Internal audit 939: 936: 926: 923: 906: 903: 893: 892:Software tools 890: 847: 846: 843: 840: 837: 836:Control guides 834: 831: 814: 811: 795: 794: 791: 771: 768: 759:United Kingdom 751:§ 7262(a) 708:Adrian Cadbury 704:Robert Maxwell 671:consent decree 654: 651: 612: 611: 609: 608: 601: 594: 586: 583: 582: 578: 577: 572: 567: 562: 557: 552: 546: 545: 542: 541: 538: 537: 533: 532: 527: 522: 517: 511: 510: 507: 506: 503: 502: 498: 497: 492: 487: 481: 480: 477: 476: 473: 472: 468: 467: 462: 457: 452: 447: 441: 440: 435: 434: 431: 430: 426: 425: 420: 418:General ledger 411: 406: 401: 396: 391: 385: 384: 379: 378: 375: 374: 370: 369: 364: 359: 354: 349: 344: 339: 333: 332: 327: 326: 323: 322: 318: 317: 312: 307: 302: 297: 292: 286: 285: 280: 279: 276: 275: 271: 270: 265: 260: 255: 250: 245: 240: 231: 226: 221: 215: 214: 211: 210: 207: 206: 202: 201: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 171: 166: 161: 156: 151: 145: 144: 141: 140: 137: 136: 132: 131: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 80: 79: 76: 75: 72: 71: 69: 68: 63: 58: 53: 47: 44: 43: 35: 34: 28: 27: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1592: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1536: 1529: 1527: 1523: 1512: 1508: 1502: 1499: 1488:on 2012-04-02 1487: 1483: 1479: 1473: 1470: 1458: 1451: 1448: 1443: 1436: 1433: 1428: 1421: 1418: 1407: 1403: 1396: 1394: 1390: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1353:on 2018-10-03 1349: 1345: 1338: 1332: 1329: 1324: 1311: 1303: 1293:on 2014-03-20 1292: 1288: 1284: 1277: 1274: 1262: 1258: 1251: 1248: 1237:on 2012-05-12 1233: 1229: 1223: 1216: 1210: 1207: 1195: 1188: 1185: 1180: 1173: 1170: 1159: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1138: 1137: 1130: 1128: 1126: 1122: 1107: 1101: 1098: 1093: 1086: 1084: 1080: 1075: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1062: 1058: 1047:on 2012-02-27 1046: 1042: 1036: 1033: 1022:on 2010-08-23 1021: 1017: 1013: 1007: 1004: 992: 985: 983: 981: 977: 970: 966: 962: 959: 958: 954: 950: 947: 945: 942: 941: 937: 935: 931: 924: 922: 920: 914: 912: 904: 902: 900: 891: 889: 886: 884: 880: 876: 872: 867: 864: 859: 856: 852: 844: 841: 838: 835: 832: 829: 828: 827: 819: 813:Methodologies 812: 810: 808: 802: 800: 792: 789: 788: 787: 781: 776: 769: 767: 764: 760: 755: 752: 748: 743: 738: 736: 732: 727: 722: 720: 719:annual report 715: 714: 709: 705: 700: 696: 694: 690: 684: 682: 681: 674: 672: 668: 664: 660: 652: 650: 646: 643: 639: 638:United States 635: 631: 626: 621: 618: 607: 602: 600: 595: 593: 588: 587: 585: 584: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 560:Error account 558: 556: 553: 551: 548: 547: 540: 539: 531: 528: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 512: 505: 504: 496: 493: 491: 488: 486: 483: 482: 475: 474: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 442: 438: 433: 432: 424: 423:Trial balance 421: 419: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 404:FIFO and LIFO 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 386: 382: 377: 376: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 355: 353: 350: 348: 345: 343: 342:Balance sheet 340: 338: 337:Annual report 335: 334: 330: 325: 324: 316: 313: 311: 308: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 287: 283: 278: 277: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 244: 241: 239: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 216: 209: 208: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 174:Going concern 172: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 155: 152: 150: 147: 146: 139: 138: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 74: 73: 67: 64: 62: 59: 57: 54: 52: 49: 48: 46: 45: 41: 37: 36: 33: 29: 25: 21: 20: 1542:. Retrieved 1514:. Retrieved 1501: 1490:. Retrieved 1486:the original 1472: 1461:. Retrieved 1450: 1441: 1435: 1426: 1420: 1409:. Retrieved 1383: 1379: 1355:. Retrieved 1348:the original 1331: 1310:cite journal 1300:– via 1295:. Retrieved 1291:the original 1286: 1276: 1265:. Retrieved 1261:the original 1250: 1239:. Retrieved 1232:the original 1209: 1198:. Retrieved 1187: 1178: 1172: 1161:. Retrieved 1135: 1113:. Retrieved 1100: 1091: 1049:. Retrieved 1045:the original 1035: 1024:. Retrieved 1020:the original 1006: 995:. Retrieved 963:used by the 932: 928: 915: 908: 895: 887: 882: 868: 860: 848: 825: 803: 796: 784: 761:in 2011 the 756: 739: 723: 712: 701: 697: 685: 678: 675: 656: 647: 622: 616: 615: 495:Luca Pacioli 416: / 236: / 234:Depreciation 142:Key concepts 114:Governmental 1540:. Dragonfly 508:Development 485:Accountants 381:Bookkeeping 300:Convergence 258:Liabilities 189:Materiality 77:Major types 1559:Categories 1544:2012-03-14 1516:2012-03-10 1492:2012-10-03 1463:2012-03-10 1459:. Risk.net 1411:2012-04-04 1357:2012-03-11 1297:2012-04-02 1267:2012-03-12 1241:2012-03-12 1227:0852589131 1200:2012-03-12 1163:2012-03-31 1157:089413406X 1115:2012-03-30 1051:2012-03-10 1026:2012-03-10 997:2012-03-10 971:References 822:processes. 543:Misconduct 169:Fair value 119:Management 61:Management 32:Accounting 925:Criticism 747:15 U.S.C. 663:Watergate 565:Hollywood 445:Financial 347:Cash-flow 104:Financial 1565:Auditing 1150:. 1998. 938:See also 905:Benefits 899:Deloitte 799:auditors 691:and the 550:Creative 520:Research 450:Internal 437:Auditing 253:Goodwill 248:Expenses 99:Forensic 24:a series 22:Part of 1144:Florida 807:heatmap 757:In the 515:History 409:Journal 268:Revenue 154:Accrual 1224:  1154:  879:COSO's 749:  460:Report 414:Ledger 357:Income 352:Equity 263:Profit 243:Equity 219:Assets 124:Social 89:Budget 1538:(PDF) 1351:(PDF) 1340:(PDF) 1235:(PDF) 1218:(PDF) 1140:(PDF) 1109:(PDF) 911:fraud 863:COBIT 642:FFIEC 630:audit 455:Firms 84:Audit 1386:: 4. 1323:help 1222:ISBN 1152:ISBN 869:The 861:The 849:The 224:Cash 109:Fund 94:Cost 129:Tax 66:Tax 1561:: 1525:^ 1509:. 1480:. 1404:. 1392:^ 1382:. 1378:. 1366:^ 1342:. 1314:: 1312:}} 1308:{{ 1287:11 1285:. 1146:: 1142:. 1124:^ 1082:^ 1060:^ 1014:. 979:^ 855:IT 721:. 695:. 26:on 1547:. 1519:. 1495:. 1466:. 1444:. 1414:. 1384:1 1360:. 1325:) 1321:( 1304:. 1270:. 1244:. 1203:. 1166:. 1118:. 1054:. 1029:. 1000:. 605:e 598:t 591:v

Index

a series
Accounting
Early 19th-century German ledger
Historical cost
Constant purchasing power
Management
Tax
Audit
Budget
Cost
Forensic
Financial
Fund
Governmental
Management
Social
Tax
Accounting period
Accrual
Constant purchasing power
Economic entity
Fair value
Going concern
Historical cost
Matching principle
Materiality
Revenue recognition
Unit of account
Assets
Cash

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑