540:
for purposes of the
Copyright Act. In other words, Google does not have any "material objects … in which a work is fixed … and from which the work can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated" and thus cannot communicate a copy. Instead of communicating a copy of the image, Google provides HTML instructions that direct a user's browser to a website publisher's computer that stores the full-size photographic image. Providing these HTML instructions is not equivalent to showing a copy. First, the HTML instructions are lines of text, not a photographic image. Second, HTML instructions do not themselves cause infringing images to appear on the user's computer screen. The HTML merely gives the address of the image to the user's browser. The browser then interacts with the computer that stores the infringing image. It is this interaction that causes an infringing image to appear on the user's computer screen. Google may facilitate the user's access to infringing images. However, such assistance raised only contributory liability issues and does not constitute direct infringement of the copyright owner's display rights. … While in-line linking and framing may cause some computer users to believe they are viewing a single Google Web page, the Copyright Act, unlike the Trademark Act, does not protect a copyright holder against acts that cause consumer confusion.
353:
copied some database information, which the court held unprotected under Danish law, and also Ofir's search engine provided deep links to the advertisements for individual properties that home A/S listed, thus by-passing the home page and search engine of home A/S. The court held that the deep linking did not create infringement liability. The Court found that search engines are desirable as well as necessary to the function of the
Internet; that it is usual that search engines provide deep links; and that businesses that offer their services on the Internet must expect that deep links will be provided to their websites. Ofir's site did not use banner advertising and its search engine allowed users, if they so chose, to go to a home page rather than directly to the advertisement of an individual property. The opinion does not appear to distinguish or explain away the difference in result from that of the
409:, Scottish Court of Session (Edinburgh, 24 October 1996). The Shetland Times challenged use by Wills of deep linking to pages of the newspaper on which selected articles of interest appeared. The objection was that defendant Wills thus by-passed the front and intervening pages on which advertising and other material appeared in which the plaintiff had an interest but defendant did not. The Times obtained an interim interdict (Scottish for preliminary injunction) and the case then settled.
286:(published by Sanoma) and hosted on a website known as FileFactory. GeenStijl covered the leak by displaying a thumbnail of one of the images and linking to the remainder of the unauthorized copies. The court ruled in favor of Sanoma, arguing that GeenStijl's authors knowingly reproduced and communicated a copyrighted work to the public without consent of its author, and that GeenStijl had profited from the unauthorized publication.
330:
Newsbooster's service allows users to enter keywords to search for news stories, and then deep links to the stories are provided. The DNPA said that this conduct was "tantamount to theft." The court ruled in favor of the DNPA, not because of the mere act of linking but because
Newsbooster used the links to gain commercial advantage over the DNPA, which was unlawful under the
138:
distributing, and creating routes for the distribution of content (information) that does not come from the proprietors of the Web pages affected by these practices, the proprietors often seek the aid of courts to suppress the conduct, particularly when the effect of the conduct is to disrupt or circumvent the proprietors' mechanisms for receiving financial compensation.
573:, the court laid down a far-reaching precedent in favour of linking and framing, which the court gave a complete pass under copyright. It concluded that "in-line linking and framing may cause some computer users to believe they are viewing a single Google Web page, the Copyright Act . . . does not protect a copyright holder against acts that cause consumer confusion."
498:(5)). He was aware of the difficulties under the reproduction and distribution provisions (17 U.S.C. §§ 106(1) and (3)), which require proof that the accused infringer trafficked in copies of the protected work. The court focused on the fair use defense, however, under which it ruled in Arriba's favour.
1141:
of Kelly's art works. Kelly had wanted to present them in a particular format and setting, but Arriba altered that by deep linking (linking well beyond Kelly's home page) directly to the images and presenting them in a different manner than the one that Kelly had chosen for them. (Arriba both in-line
604:
on rumors that Brady was helping with the
Celtics' recruitment. Several news organizations subsequently published stories embedding the tweets with Goldman's photograph in the stories. Goldman took legal action against nine of these news agencies, claiming they violated his copyright. Judge Katherine
451:
raised a number of defenses explained in detail in its pleadings, including implied license, contributory negligence, and voluntary assumption of the risk. Microsoft also argued that
Ticketmaster had breached an unwritten Internet code, under which any website operator has the right to link to anyone
352:
in
Copenhagen took a somewhat different view in 2005 in a suit that home A/S, a real estate chain, brought against Ofir A-S, an Internet portal (OFiR), which maintains an Internet search engine. home A/S maintains an Internet website that has a searchable database of its current realty listings. Ofir
329:
The
Bailiff's Court of Copenhagen ruled in July 2002 against the Danish Website Newsbooster, holding, in a suit brought by the Danish Newspaper Publishers Association (DNPA), that Newsbooster had violated Danish copyright law by deep linking to newspaper articles on Danish newspapers' Internet sites.
203:
case, Perfect 10 argued that Google's image pages caused viewers to believe they were seeing the images on Google's website. The court brushed this argument aside: "While in-line linking and framing may cause some computer users to believe they are viewing a single Google Web page, the
Copyright Act,
187:
case, held that, when Google provided links to images, Google did not violate the provisions of the copyright law prohibiting unauthorized reproduction and distribution of copies of a work: "Because Google's computers do not store the photographic images, Google does not have a copy of the images for
176:, 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007), the Ninth Circuit held that when Google stored thumbnail versions of Perfect 10's magazine images on its server to communicate them to Google's users, Google prima facie violated Perfect 10's copyright. But the court also held that Google had a valid fair use defense.
137:
concern how courts address two different but related Web technologies. In large part, the legal issues concern use of these technologies to create or facilitate public access to proprietary media content — such as portions of commercial websites. When hyperlinking and framing have the effect of
530:
We conclude that the significantly transformative nature of Google's search engine, particularly in light of its public benefit, outweighs Google's superseding and commercial uses of the thumbnails in this case. … We are also mindful of the
Supreme Court's direction that "the more transformative the
216:
t was the actual display of the full-size images of Kelly’s work stripped from the original context that was not fair use. Merely linking to Kelly's originating home page, on the other hand, without free-standing display of the full-size images, would not run afoul of the fair use limits established
539:
Google does not … display a copy of full-size infringing photographic images for purposes of the
Copyright Act when Google frames in-line linked images that appear on a user's computer screen. Because Google's computers do not store the photographic images, Google does not have a copy of the images
372:
In July 2003 a German Federal Superior Court held that the Paperboy search engine could lawfully deep link to news stories. An appellate court then overturned the ruling, but the German Federal Supreme Court reversed in favor of Paperboy. "A sensible use of the immense wealth of information offered
208:
Using an ordinary (deep) hyperlink to the image at the remote server, so that users must click on a link on the hosting page to jump to the image. The HTML code would be https://www.supremecourt.gov/images/sectionbanner13.png. This has been protested because it bypasses everything at the other site
560:
case stood for the proposition that deep linking and actual reproduction in reduced-size copies (or preparation of reduced-size derivative works) were both excusable as fair use because the defendant's use of the work did not actually or potentially divert trade in the marketplace from the first
481:
Kelly complained, among other things, that Arriba's search engine used thumbnails to deep link to images on his Web page. The court found that Arriba's use was highly transformative, in that it made available to Internet users a functionality not previously available, and that was not otherwise
253:
The embedding in a website of a protected work which is publicly accessible on another website by means of a link using the framing technology … does not by itself constitute communication to the public within the meaning of to the extent that the relevant work is neither communicated to a new
383:
In Germany making content available to the public on a Website by embedding the content with inline links now appears to be copyright infringement. This applies even though a copy has never been taken and kept of an image and even though the image is never "physically" part of the website. The
446:
In April 1997 Ticketmaster sued Microsoft in Los Angeles federal district court for deep linking. Ticketmaster objected to Microsoft's bypassing the home and intermediate pages on Ticketmaster's site, claiming that Microsoft had "pilfered" its content and diluted its value. Microsoft's
305:
In September 2006, Copiepresse, a Belgian association of French-speaking newspaper editors, sued Google and obtained an injunctive order from the Belgian Court of First Instance that Google must stop deep linking to Belgian newspapers without paying royalties, or else pay a fine of
489:
As in other cases, Kelly objected to linking because it caused users to bypass his home page and intervening pages. He was unable, however, to show substantial economic harm. Kelly argued largely that the part of the copyright statute violated was the public display right
565:
case involved similar considerations, but more of a balancing of interests was involved. The conduct was excused because the value to the public of the otherwise unavailable, useful function outweighed the impact on Perfect 10 of Google's possibly superseding use.
271:
In September 2016, the European Court of Justice ruled that knowingly linking to an unauthorized posting of a copyrighted work for commercial gain constituted infringement of the exclusive right to communicate the work to the public. The case surrounded
609:
ruling. Forrest said that as the news agencies had to take specific steps to embed the tweets with the photograph in their stories, wrote the stories to highlight those, and otherwise was not providing an automated service like Google's search engine.
384:
Düsseldorf appeal court overruled the lower Court of First Instance in this case. The Defendant had included links on his blog to two photographs that appeared on the Claimant's website. No prior permission had been sought or obtained.
452:
else's site. A number of articles in the trade press derided Ticketmaster's suit. The case was settled in February 1999, on confidential terms; Microsoft stopped the deep linking and instead used a link to Ticketmaster's home page.
681:
577:
432:), and Reuters sued Total News Inc. for framing their news stories on the Total News Web page. The case was settled in June 1997, on the basis that linking without framing would be used in the future.
263:
482:
readily provided — an improved way to search for images (by using visual cues instead of verbal cues). This factor, combined with the relatively slight economic harm to Kelly, tipped the
561:
work; and also it provided the public with a previously unavailable, very useful function of the kind that copyright law exists to promote (finding desired information on the Web). The
1137:
Kelly's position, as crystallized at the final stages of the appeal, was that an unauthorized public display occurred (or the conduct was not fair use) because Arriba was changing the
1166:
373:
by the World Wide Web is practically impossible without drawing on the search engines and their hyperlink services (especially deep links)," the German court said.
864:
812:
457:
349:
108:
981:
64:
934:
888:
514:
491:
785:
531:
new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use."
477:
526:
case, the court nonetheless found the accused infringer's use fair because it was "highly transformative." The court explained:
1055:
535:
In addition, the court specifically addressed the copyright status of linking, in the first U.S. appellate decision to do so:
1076:
217:
by the Panel. It is striking that nowhere in briefs do they explain why linking could not be constructed in this fashion.
39:
838:
101:
605:
Forrest decided in favour of Goldman and asserting the news sites violated his copyright, rejecting elements of the
780:
209:
but the image. Such protests have been largely ineffective. This argument on Kelly's behalf is articulated in the
246:
405:
134:
59:
1146:
was perhaps best articulated in the brief of Kelly's amicus, the American Society of Media Photographers, Inc.
707:
34:
204:
unlike the Trademark Act, does not protect a copyright holder against acts that cause consumer confusion."
1203:
1171:
865:""Embedding" Images From Third Party Sites In Websites Is Copyright Infringement | cliffordmillerlaw"
331:
94:
1198:
1090:
816:
755:
959:
As to Shetland Times Ltd v Wills, see, in particular, Smith, Internet Law and Regulation, pp liv &
254:
public nor by using a specific technical means different from that used for the original communication.
223:
A more detailed description of the alternatives with implementing HTML code snippets is available at
783:(April 2006). "Clearing the legal barriers – Danish court upholds 'deep linking' in Home v. Ofir".
985:
964:
1208:
1125:
1095:
282:
938:
896:
264:
Courth ruling (C-348/13) of the BestWater International GmbH vs. Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch
1007:
732:
1070:
968:
44:
960:
518:, the Ninth Circuit again considered whether an image search engine's use of thumbnail was a
794:
76:
249:'s binding ruling in 2014 was that embedding a work could not be a violation of copyright:
259:
1167:"Judge Rules News Publishers Violated Copyright by Embedding Tweets of Tom Brady Photo"
589:
1031:
1192:
122:
157:
126:
71:
495:
475:
The first important U.S. decision in this field was that of the Ninth Circuit in
657:
593:
49:
798:
310:
1 million daily. Many newspaper columns were critical of Copiepresse's stance.
910:
682:"Europe's Court of Justice rules that hyperlinking can infringe on copyright"
428:
In February 1997 the Washington Post, CNN, the Los Angeles Times, Dow Jones (
280:; in 2011, photos were leaked from an upcoming issue of the Dutch version of
839:"German ruling sanctions deep linking | Managing Intellectual Property"
585:
273:
597:
584:, Justin Goldman, a photographer, posted his on-the-street photograph of
519:
483:
81:
658:"Chapter 6B2 - I.P. Protection of Digital Rights in the New Millennium"
601:
213:
brief supporting Kelly by the American Society of Media Photographers:
191:
This expedient has been challenged as copyright infringement. See the
277:
24:
307:
911:"Shetland News v. Shetland Times - 24 October 1996 - Deep Links"
378:
Decision I-20 U 42/11 Dusseldorf Court of Appeal 8 October 2011
813:"German Court: Deep Linking is Legal | paidContent:UK"
183:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the
522:. Although the facts were somewhat closer than in the
580:
created a new challenge to the established cases. In
578:
District Court for the Southern District of New York
461:(2000), yielded a ruling in favour of deep linking.
1091:"Ticketmaster and Microsoft Settle Linking Dispute"
600:, which became popular over social media such as
1058:. Archived from the original on January 30, 2000
889:"Cases | Shetland Times v. Jonathan Wills"
251:
403:The first suit of prominence in the field was
102:
8:
963:; Scott on Multimedia Law, 2013 Supplement,
334:. The court enjoined Newsbooster's service.
1142:linked and deep linked.) The position that
967:and Murray, Information Technology Law, pp
708:"Irish business, finance news on economics"
576:A February 2018 summary judgement from the
643:Kelly unsuccessfully argued this point in
109:
95:
15:
1144:changing context = copyright infringement
236:History of copyright litigation in field
618:
486:balance decisively in Arriba's favour.
458:Ticketmaster Corp. v. Tickets.com, Inc.
320:Danish Newspaper Publishers Association
23:
1068:
1008:"Ticketmaster Complaint v. Microsoft"
7:
1032:"Microsoft's Answer to Ticketmaster"
647:, 336 F.3d 811, 816 (9th Cir. 2003).
515:Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
1165:Gardner, Eriq (February 16, 2018).
863:cliffordmiller (27 January 2012).
786:Computer Law & Security Report
225:Is Linking Copyright Infringement?
14:
756:"Deep Link Foes Get Another Win"
733:"A Reality Check for Newspapers"
188:purposes of the Copyright Act."
174:Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
869:Cliffordmillerlaw.wordpress.com
754:Michelle Delio (8 July 2002).
1:
1155:487 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2007).
1115:336 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003).
350:Maritime and Commercial Court
895:. 1996-10-24. Archived from
1056:"SALON | Media Circus"
1225:
799:10.1016/j.clsr.2006.05.007
781:Sylvia Mercado-Kierkegaard
731:Fry, Jason (May 7, 2007).
645:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
478:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
406:Shetland Times Ltd v Wills
25:Legal aspects of computing
1075:: CS1 maint: unfit URL (
935:"Shetland Times v. Wills"
247:European Court of Justice
545:State of U.S. law after
60:Regulation of algorithms
55:Hyperlinking and framing
367:Holtzbrinck v. Paperboy
35:Information privacy law
1172:The Hollywood Reporter
542:
533:
269:
219:
199:cases (below). In the
125:, the legal status of
735:. Wall Street Journal
537:
528:
266:(ECLI:EU:C:2014:2315)
214:
819:on November 19, 2008
582:Goldman v. Breitbart
332:Danish Marketing Act
988:on October 13, 2008
688:. 11 September 2016
430:Wall Street Journal
19:Part of a series on
1126:Transformativeness
1096:The New York Times
982:"Court TV Library"
394:Shetland Times Ltd
168:Hierarchy of links
893:Netlitigation.com
634:508 F.3d at 1161.
625:508 F.3d at 1160.
119:
118:
77:Software licenses
45:Computer trespass
1216:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1179:
1162:
1156:
1153:
1147:
1135:
1129:
1122:
1116:
1113:
1107:
1106:
1104:
1103:
1087:
1081:
1080:
1074:
1066:
1064:
1063:
1052:
1046:
1045:
1043:
1042:
1036:Docs.law.gwu.edu
1028:
1022:
1021:
1019:
1018:
1012:Docs.law.gwu.edu
1004:
998:
997:
995:
993:
984:. Archived from
978:
972:
957:
951:
950:
948:
946:
941:on April 1, 2011
937:. Archived from
931:
925:
924:
922:
921:
907:
901:
900:
885:
879:
878:
876:
875:
860:
854:
853:
851:
850:
835:
829:
828:
826:
824:
815:. Archived from
809:
803:
802:
777:
771:
770:
768:
766:
751:
745:
744:
742:
740:
728:
722:
721:
719:
718:
704:
698:
697:
695:
693:
678:
672:
671:
669:
668:
662:Docs.law.gwu.edu
654:
648:
641:
635:
632:
626:
623:
267:
260:EDRI translation
111:
104:
97:
65:Regulation of AI
16:
1224:
1223:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1177:
1175:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1136:
1132:
1124:See article on
1123:
1119:
1114:
1110:
1101:
1099:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1067:
1061:
1059:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1040:
1038:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1016:
1014:
1006:
1005:
1001:
991:
989:
980:
979:
975:
958:
954:
944:
942:
933:
932:
928:
919:
917:
915:Linksandlaw.com
909:
908:
904:
887:
886:
882:
873:
871:
862:
861:
857:
848:
846:
837:
836:
832:
822:
820:
811:
810:
806:
779:
778:
774:
764:
762:
753:
752:
748:
738:
736:
730:
729:
725:
716:
714:
706:
705:
701:
691:
689:
680:
679:
675:
666:
664:
656:
655:
651:
642:
638:
633:
629:
624:
620:
616:
554:
510:
473:
444:
426:
419:Washington Post
415:
401:
390:
381:
370:
363:
346:
327:
316:
303:
292:
268:
258:
243:
238:
233:
170:
165:
154:
149:
144:
133:") and that of
115:
86:
12:
11:
5:
1222:
1220:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1157:
1148:
1130:
1117:
1108:
1082:
1047:
1023:
999:
973:
952:
926:
902:
899:on 2019-01-18.
880:
855:
843:Managingip.com
830:
804:
793:(4): 326–332.
772:
746:
723:
699:
673:
649:
636:
627:
617:
615:
612:
596:and others to
590:Boston Celtics
553:
543:
509:
500:
492:17 U.S.C.
472:
463:
455:A later case,
443:
434:
425:
416:
414:
411:
400:
391:
389:
386:
380:
375:
369:
364:
362:
359:
345:
336:
326:
317:
315:
312:
302:
293:
291:
288:
256:
242:
241:European Union
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
221:
220:
180:. at 1163-64.
169:
166:
164:
161:
153:
150:
148:
145:
143:
140:
129:(also termed "
117:
116:
114:
113:
106:
99:
91:
88:
87:
85:
84:
79:
74:
69:
68:
67:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
31:
28:
27:
21:
20:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1221:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1204:Copyright law
1202:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1194:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1161:
1158:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1134:
1131:
1127:
1121:
1118:
1112:
1109:
1098:
1097:
1092:
1086:
1083:
1078:
1072:
1057:
1051:
1048:
1037:
1033:
1027:
1024:
1013:
1009:
1003:
1000:
987:
983:
977:
974:
970:
966:
962:
956:
953:
940:
936:
930:
927:
916:
912:
906:
903:
898:
894:
890:
884:
881:
870:
866:
859:
856:
844:
840:
834:
831:
818:
814:
808:
805:
800:
796:
792:
788:
787:
782:
776:
773:
761:
757:
750:
747:
734:
727:
724:
713:
709:
703:
700:
687:
683:
677:
674:
663:
659:
653:
650:
646:
640:
637:
631:
628:
622:
619:
613:
611:
608:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
572:
569:Moreover, in
567:
564:
559:
552:
548:
544:
541:
536:
532:
527:
525:
521:
517:
516:
508:
504:
501:
499:
497:
493:
487:
485:
480:
479:
471:
467:
464:
462:
460:
459:
453:
450:
442:
438:
435:
433:
431:
424:
420:
417:
413:United States
412:
410:
408:
407:
399:
395:
392:
387:
385:
379:
376:
374:
368:
365:
360:
358:
356:
351:
344:
340:
337:
335:
333:
325:
321:
318:
313:
311:
309:
301:
297:
294:
289:
287:
285:
284:
279:
275:
265:
261:
255:
250:
248:
240:
235:
230:
228:
226:
218:
212:
211:amicus curiae
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
194:
189:
186:
181:
179:
175:
167:
162:
160:
159:
151:
147:Ordinary link
146:
141:
139:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:copyright law
112:
107:
105:
100:
98:
93:
92:
90:
89:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
66:
63:
62:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
32:
30:
29:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1199:Computer law
1178:February 16,
1176:. Retrieved
1170:
1160:
1151:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1120:
1111:
1100:. Retrieved
1094:
1085:
1060:. Retrieved
1050:
1039:. Retrieved
1035:
1026:
1015:. Retrieved
1011:
1002:
992:November 26,
990:. Retrieved
986:the original
976:
955:
945:November 22,
943:. Retrieved
939:the original
929:
918:. Retrieved
914:
905:
897:the original
892:
883:
872:. Retrieved
868:
858:
847:. Retrieved
845:. 2003-07-27
842:
833:
823:November 27,
821:. Retrieved
817:the original
807:
790:
784:
775:
765:25 September
763:. Retrieved
759:
749:
737:. Retrieved
726:
715:. Retrieved
712:Finfacts.com
711:
702:
692:12 September
690:. Retrieved
685:
676:
665:. Retrieved
661:
652:
644:
639:
630:
621:
606:
581:
575:
570:
568:
562:
557:
555:
550:
546:
538:
534:
529:
523:
513:
511:
506:
502:
488:
476:
474:
469:
465:
456:
454:
448:
445:
440:
437:Ticketmaster
436:
429:
427:
422:
418:
404:
402:
397:
393:
382:
377:
371:
366:
354:
347:
342:
338:
328:
323:
319:
304:
299:
295:
281:
270:
262:of original
252:
244:
224:
222:
215:
210:
200:
196:
192:
190:
184:
182:
177:
173:
171:
158:Deep linking
155:
130:
127:hyperlinking
120:
72:Software law
54:
40:File sharing
594:Danny Ainge
558:Arriba Soft
547:Arriba Soft
524:Arriba Soft
470:Arriba Soft
355:Newsbooster
324:Newsbooster
296:Copiepresse
193:Arriba Soft
163:Inline link
50:Data mining
1193:Categories
1102:2016-04-03
1062:2016-04-03
1041:2016-04-03
1017:2016-04-03
971:& 255.
920:2016-04-03
874:2016-04-03
849:2016-04-03
717:2016-04-03
667:2016-04-03
614:References
607:Perfect 10
571:Perfect 10
563:Perfect 10
551:Perfect 10
503:Perfect 10
496:§ 106
423:Total News
201:Perfect 10
197:Perfect 10
185:Perfect 10
1209:Hypertext
686:The Verge
586:Tom Brady
441:Microsoft
274:GeenStijl
152:Deep link
1071:cite web
598:Snapchat
520:fair use
484:fair use
388:Scotland
343:Ofir A-S
339:home A/S
257:—
82:Spamming
1139:context
965:p 4-152
602:Twitter
361:Germany
314:Denmark
290:Belgium
283:Playboy
231:Framing
142:Linking
135:framing
131:linking
739:May 7,
507:Amazon
494:
449:Answer
357:case.
300:Google
278:Sanoma
760:Wired
588:with
466:Kelly
398:Wills
1180:2018
1077:link
994:2008
947:2008
825:2008
767:2012
741:2007
694:2016
556:The
549:and
348:The
276:and
245:The
195:and
156:See
969:254
795:doi
592:GM
512:In
505:v.
468:v.
439:v.
421:v.
341:v.
322:v.
298:v.
172:In
121:In
1195::
1169:.
1093:.
1073:}}
1069:{{
1034:.
1010:.
961:63
913:.
891:.
867:.
841:.
791:22
789:.
758:.
710:.
684:.
660:.
396:v
227:.
178:Id
1182:.
1128:.
1105:.
1079:)
1065:.
1044:.
1020:.
996:.
949:.
923:.
877:.
852:.
827:.
801:.
797::
769:.
743:.
720:.
696:.
670:.
490:(
308:€
110:e
103:t
96:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.