Knowledge

Crime displacement

Source 📝

230:. With the increase of barriers by government officials to obtaining precursor and essential chemicals, the question is how criminal organizations respond to a shortage of chemicals. Illegal organizations began by substituting other chemicals for specific precursors, making the drugs more dangerous to those using them. Criminals were initially not displaced, instead adapting to the new regulations. The study of potential adverse effects is a valuable tool in creating situational crime-prevention policies. By evaluating potential effects, a policy can be predicted to have a positive or negative result. Vijlbrief (2012) states in his research that "Some measures can be said to have a waterbed effect: repression of criminal activities in one location may cause an increase in the same criminal activities somewhere else. Displacement is not limited to geographical effects. Perpetrators may also shift their activities to completely different types of crime, or even continue to commit the same crime using different methods or means"( p. 199). Studying the relationship between interventions by law-enforcement bodies and displacement effects proved complex. One conclusion in the study by Vijlbrief (2012) is that "there is limited attention for displacement effects or the diffusion of benefits" (ibid; Kim et al. 2007); "It is difficult to isolate the effect of a given measure because neighboring factors always have an influence" (Shukla and Bartgis 2009, p. 354). Measuring displacement effects for an illegal organization in the synthetic drug market is complex, since the market is multifaceted and extensive. Organized criminals are likely to adapt their methods to changing circumstances, leading to displacement; this assumes that crime organizations have the resources to adapt to policy change. 255:. According to Ratcliffe (2009), "Police departments can respond to a rise in crime with a series of high-visibility, directed, uniform patrol deployment initiatives" (p. 230). Deploying a variety of resources, such as extra officers and heightened surveillance of community crime hotspots, can counteract criminal conduct. Targeted law enforcement has been criticized as a primary reason for crime displacement to other areas. The manipulation of environmental factors to prevent crime has also been supported by scholars, who argue that the targeting of specific crime problems (and areas) in a community can result in the diffusion of benefits. According to Ratcliffe (2009), diffusion of benefits results in " ... crime-reduction benefits of the police operation spill over into areas not directly targeted by the law-enforcement action" (p. 231). rs and Johnson (2003) report that a central rationale behind displacement " ... is that it can only be attributed to crime-prevention activity if crime is reduced in the targeted area considered". If crime relocates for other reasons, it does not constitute crime displacement. Situational crime prevention (SCP), allied with crime displacement and diffusion of benefits, is also a target of criticism. Philips (2011) writes, " ... a major criticism of such physical SCP strategies has been the threat of crime displacement, and the assertion that the foreclosure of one type of criminal opportunity (will) simply shift the incidence of crime to different forms, times and locales" (Repetto, 1976:167). The ability of criminals to adapt to changing law-enforcement policies allows for other types of criminal activity. 219:
diffusion of benefits. Philips conducted the study to " ... discover whether the criminological orthodox 'knowledge' that interventions do not result in 100-percent crime displacement, and may even lead to a 'diffusion of benefits'—defined as ‘the unexpected reduction of crimes not directly targeted by the preventive action" could be proven (Clarke and Weisburd,1994:165). Reviewing a wide variety of published empirical data, Phillips found that displacement is not inevitable, but is very common. Sixty-three percent of the cases studied showed some sort of displacement, and a review of offender studies demonstrated 84.6 percent displacement. These results challenge the orthodox view on crime displacement, raising the question of whether the orthodox view is biased.
132:, but it may occur at other levels and for other reasons. Community-development efforts may be a reason why criminals move to other areas for their criminal activity. The idea behind displacement is that when motivated criminal offenders are deterred, they will commit crimes elsewhere. Geographic police initiatives include assigning police officers to specific districts so they become familiar with residents and their problems, creating a bond between law-enforcement agencies and the community. These initiatives complement crime displacement, and are a form of 264:
also relates changes in this area to those in the target area" (p. 712). Using the WDQ can facilitate the work of researchers seeking to reduce crime in their community while minimizing the negative impact on surrounding areas. If a community is experiencing an increase in car thefts (especially on dimly-lit streets), as a situational crime-prevention strategy the county can invest in brighter street-light bulbs. As a follow-up measure, law-enforcement agencies can advise communities about possible
25: 206:
effects of targeted law enforcement, but the ease with which the system can be used comes from its being a simple series of statistical tests on data. WDQ works as an overall process, and is an effective technique to measure the geographical displacement of crime. In addition to measuring this, the tool can also measure the diffusion of benefit of law-enforcement efforts.
268:
in hotspot areas (making the crime riskier to commit, and dissuading potential thieves). Measures such as these will reduce theft in an area, potentially displacing the crime to a neighboring community. By measuring data with the WDQ system, law-enforcement agents can pinpoint the areas most affected
233:
There is also a large research literature examining the extent to which the introduction of CCTV causes spatial displacement of crime. A systematic review of this literature published in 2009 concluded that CCTV schemes "usually showed evidence of no displacement rather than displacement or diffusion
205:
scholars lacked a systematic approach to measuring crime displacement until the introduction of the weighted displacement quotient (WDQ) by rs and Johnson (2003). Although this tool is not widely recognized, its use has made displacement statistically recordable. WDQ is one part of understanding the
193:
and notifying police of criminal activity. The basis of this theory is that crime can be prevented by altering situations, instead of changing a criminal’s disposition. According to Phillips (2011), "The criminologically-orthodox view of crime displacement is that displacement is not inevitable, is
263:
Crime displacement as crime prevention is contradictory, suggesting further development of the weighted displacement quotient (WDQ). Before the WDQ, investigating the phenomenon was difficult. rs (2003) writes that the " ... WDQ not only measures what occurs in a buffer zone (displacement) but
218:
Division of Criminology reviewed the existing literature and performed a secondary analysis on the published results of empirical data. An orthodox view of displacement is considered throughout the study: crime displacement is considered inevitable, but is less than anticipated and may lead to a
188:
may reduce opportunities for criminals to commit crime, making it more difficult (and riskier) to commit a criminal act and creating doubt in a criminal's mind that they can get away with a crime. Situational crime prevention uses the environment to create barriers to crime, and may be done by
589:
Weisburd, David; Wyckoff, Laura A.; Ready, Justin; Eck, John E.; Hinkle, Joshua C.; Gajewski, Frank (2006-08-01). "Does Crime Just Move Around the Corner? a Controlled Study of Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits*".
194:
often less than anticipated, and that situational crime-prevention initiatives may even lead to a 'diffusion of benefits'" (p. 1). Situational crime prevention plays an important role in deterring crime, but may also displace it.
430:
Bowers, Kate J.; Johnson, Shane D.; Guerette, Rob T.; Summers, Lucia; Poynton, Suzanne (2011-12-01). "Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing initiatives: a meta-analytical review".
250:
Criticism in this field goes beyond targeting the term "displacement", also touching upon the policies cause this phenomenon. One is police-oriented policies which are applied widely in police districts in the
524:
Johnson, Shane D.; Bowers, Kate J.; Young, Chris; Hirschfield, Alex F. G. (2001-10-01). "Uncovering the True Picture: Evaluating Crime Reduction Initiatives Using Disaggregate Crime Data".
468:
Guerette, Rob T.; Bowers, Kate J. (2009-11-01). "Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations*".
189:
homeowners, architects and local officials. For example, making streets and buildings safer can reduce crime. Neighbors may play a role in reducing crime by becoming
269:
and calculate the diffusion of benefits. Sharing data with other agencies will create an information network capable of preventing crime over a broader area.
313:
Bowers, Kate J.; Johnson, Shane D. (2003-09-01). "Measuring the Geographical Displacement and Diffusion of Benefit Effects of Crime Prevention Activity".
520:(2007). "Crime prevention and displacement: Investigating scripts for offender movement". Conference Papers—American Society of Criminology, 1. 252: 560:
Weisburd, David, Green, Lorraine and Weisburd, J. (1995). "Measuring immediate spatial displacement: Methodological issues and problems".
42: 108: 356:
Welsh, Brandon; Farrington, David (2009). "Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
242:
assessing the effects of CCTV concluded that the "evidence on the prevalence of displacement and diffusion of benefit was mixed".
89: 61: 46: 222:
The second study was conducted by Matthijs F. J. Vijlbrief for the National Crime Squad of the Netherlands Police Agency in
226:, the Netherlands. Using the Dutch synthetic market as a case study, Vijlbrief (2012) assessed the role of displacement in 68: 235: 215: 75: 499:"An Application of the Dynamic Pattern Analysis Framework to the Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Crime Relationships" 498: 283: 129: 293: 288: 57: 391:
Alexandrie, Gustav (2017). "Surveillance cameras and crime: a review of randomized and natural experiments".
35: 137: 628: 185: 128:(or criminals) as a result of police crime-prevention efforts. Crime displacement has been linked to 239: 549: 456: 408: 373: 338: 190: 141: 82: 607: 541: 485: 448: 330: 599: 533: 477: 440: 400: 365: 322: 202: 133: 265: 227: 278: 162: 160:, which, according to Bowers and Johnson (2003), is "where offenders adopt a different 622: 603: 567:
Barnes, Geoffrey C. and Weisburd, J. (1995). "Defining and optimizing displacement".
553: 481: 460: 412: 377: 342: 537: 404: 156:, which involves criminal activity at different times of the day. The second is 24: 152:
Six types of crime displacement have been identified and defined. The first is
444: 369: 326: 223: 611: 545: 489: 452: 334: 497:
Leong, Kelvin; Li, Junco; Chi-fai Chan, Stephen; T. Y. Ng, Vincent (2009).
174:
is the fourth type, involving offenders choosing a new crime to commit.
393:
Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention
125: 136:. Experts in the area of crime displacement include Kate Bowers, 516:
Lab, S., Sidebottom, A., Bouhana, N., Bowers, K., Johnson, S.
18: 182:
is the replacement of apprehended criminals by new ones.
574:
Eck, John E. (1993). "The threat of crime displacement".
170:, in which criminals select different types of targets. 49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 178:is when offenders commit crimes in new locations. 234:of benefits". Similarly, a more recent review of 583:Crime displacement: The other side of prevention 8: 16:Relocation of crime following police efforts 109:Learn how and when to remove this message 305: 214:A study by Catherine Phillips for the 526:Crime Prevention and Community Safety 506:Journal of Universal Computer Science 7: 47:adding citations to reliable sources 433:Journal of Experimental Criminology 315:Journal of Quantitative Criminology 166:" (p. 276). The third type is 14: 604:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00057.x 482:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00177.x 23: 34:needs additional citations for 1: 538:10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140102 405:10.1080/14043858.2017.1387410 259:Crime-prevention implications 581:McNamara, Robert P. (1994). 236:randomized controlled trials 186:Situational crime prevention 216:Nottingham Trent University 645: 576:Criminal Justice Abstracts 172:Type of crime displacement 445:10.1007/s11292-011-9134-8 370:10.1080/07418820802506206 284:Displacement (psychology) 130:problem-oriented policing 294:Trans-cultural diffusion 289:Regulatory crime control 180:Perpetrator displacement 327:10.1023/A:1024909009240 158:tactical displacement 154:temporal displacement 124:is the relocation of 176:Spatial displacement 58:"Crime displacement" 43:improve this article 240:natural experiments 168:target displacement 122:Crime displacement 578:, 25(3), 527-546. 358:Justice Quarterly 210:Empirical support 119: 118: 111: 93: 636: 615: 557: 513: 503: 493: 476:(4): 1331–1368. 464: 417: 416: 388: 382: 381: 353: 347: 346: 310: 266:sting operations 203:Criminal justice 138:Rob T. Guerette, 134:crime prevention 114: 107: 103: 100: 94: 92: 51: 27: 19: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 634: 633: 619: 618: 588: 569:Crime and Place 562:Crime and Place 523: 512:(9): 1852–1870. 501: 496: 467: 429: 426: 424:Further reading 421: 420: 390: 389: 385: 355: 354: 350: 312: 311: 307: 302: 275: 261: 248: 228:organized crime 212: 200: 150: 115: 104: 98: 95: 52: 50: 40: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 642: 640: 632: 631: 621: 620: 617: 616: 598:(3): 549–592. 586: 579: 572: 565: 558: 521: 514: 494: 465: 439:(4): 347–374. 425: 422: 419: 418: 399:(2): 210–222. 383: 348: 321:(3): 275–301. 304: 303: 301: 298: 297: 296: 291: 286: 281: 279:Crime hotspots 274: 271: 260: 257: 247: 244: 211: 208: 199: 196: 163:modus operandi 149: 146: 117: 116: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 641: 630: 627: 626: 624: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 587: 584: 580: 577: 573: 570: 566: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 522: 519: 515: 511: 507: 500: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 428: 427: 423: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 387: 384: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 352: 349: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 309: 306: 299: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 282: 280: 277: 276: 272: 270: 267: 258: 256: 254: 253:United States 245: 243: 241: 237: 231: 229: 225: 220: 217: 209: 207: 204: 197: 195: 192: 187: 183: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 159: 155: 147: 145: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 113: 110: 102: 91: 88: 84: 81: 77: 74: 70: 67: 63: 60: –  59: 55: 54:Find sources: 48: 44: 38: 37: 32:This article 30: 26: 21: 20: 595: 591: 582: 575: 568: 561: 529: 525: 517: 509: 505: 473: 469: 436: 432: 396: 392: 386: 361: 357: 351: 318: 314: 308: 262: 249: 232: 221: 213: 201: 198:Developments 184: 179: 175: 171: 167: 161: 157: 153: 151: 148:Key concepts 121: 120: 105: 96: 86: 79: 72: 65: 53: 41:Please help 36:verification 33: 629:Criminology 592:Criminology 532:(4): 7–24. 470:Criminology 142:John E. Eck 564:, 349-363. 364:(4): 716. 300:References 224:Driebergen 69:newspapers 612:1745-9125 571:, 95-114. 554:144073359 546:1460-3780 490:1745-9125 461:143799229 453:1573-3750 413:149144413 378:143289935 343:132992283 335:0748-4518 246:Criticism 623:Category 273:See also 191:watchmen 99:May 2015 83:scholar 610:  552:  544:  518:et al. 488:  459:  451:  411:  376:  341:  333:  85:  78:  71:  64:  56:  550:S2CID 502:(PDF) 457:S2CID 409:S2CID 374:S2CID 339:S2CID 126:crime 90:JSTOR 76:books 608:ISSN 542:ISSN 486:ISSN 449:ISSN 331:ISSN 238:and 140:and 62:news 600:doi 534:doi 478:doi 441:doi 401:doi 366:doi 323:doi 45:by 625:: 606:. 596:44 594:. 548:. 540:. 528:. 510:15 508:. 504:. 484:. 474:47 472:. 455:. 447:. 435:. 407:. 397:18 395:. 372:. 362:26 360:. 337:. 329:. 319:19 317:. 144:. 614:. 602:: 585:. 556:. 536:: 530:3 492:. 480:: 463:. 443:: 437:7 415:. 403:: 380:. 368:: 345:. 325:: 112:) 106:( 101:) 97:( 87:· 80:· 73:· 66:· 39:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Crime displacement"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
crime
problem-oriented policing
crime prevention
Rob T. Guerette,
John E. Eck
modus operandi
Situational crime prevention
watchmen
Criminal justice
Nottingham Trent University
Driebergen
organized crime
randomized controlled trials
natural experiments
United States
sting operations
Crime hotspots
Displacement (psychology)
Regulatory crime control

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.