Knowledge (XXG)

Cross-functional team

Source đź“ť

186:, but often is led by a manager/coach/team leader. Leadership can be a significant challenge with cross-functional teams. Leaders are charged with the task of directing team members of various disciplines. They must transform different variations of input into one cohesive final output. Cross-functional teams can be likened to the board of directors of a company. A group of individuals of various backgrounds and disciplines are assembled to collaborate in an efficient manner in order to better the organization or solve a problem. 168:
perspective to the problem and potential solution to the task. In business today, innovation is a leading competitive advantage and cross-functional teams promote innovation through a creative collaboration process. Members of a cross-functional team need not be well versed in multi-tasking per se, but must be prepared to help out in different aspects of building an actual product as they are collectively responsible for their cross-functional team duties as well as their normal day-to-day work tasks.
226:(SBU) objectives, and these in turn, drove functional level objectives. Today, organizations have flatter structures, companies diversify less, and functional departments have started to become less well-defined. The rise of self-directed teams reflects these trends. Intra-team dynamics tend to become multi-directional rather than hierarchical. Interactive processes encourage consensus within teams. Also the directives given to the team tend to become more general and less prescribed. 244:
will need information traditionally used in strategic, tactical, and operational decisions. For example, new product development traditionally ranks as a tactical procedure. It gets strategic direction from top management, and uses operational departments like engineering and marketing to perform its task. But a new product development team would consist of people from the operational departments and often someone from top management.
235:
accessible through a single interface. An inherent benefit of a cross-functional team is the breadth of knowledge brought to the group by each member. Each team member is a representative of a department and therefore can leverage their familiarity with accessing and providing knowledge of that department for the team. This increases the efficiency of a cross-functional team by reducing time spent gathering information.
293:, business decision making has become more goal-oriented. Managers have come to view decision-making generally, and strategic thinking in particular, as a multi-stage process that starts with an assessment of the current situation, defining objectives, then determining how to reach these objectives. Management by objectives took this basic scheme and applied it to virtually all significant decisions. 36: 328:
It becomes important for the organizations to build a culture among its employees, a sense of entitlement with each of the stakeholders to push them to give an extra effort and collaborate with other teams to achieve company goals. This is critical to proactive collaboration, beyond just at a time of
234:
Cross-functional teams require a wide range of information to reach their decisions. They need to draw on information from all parts of an organization's information base. This includes information from all functional departments. System integration becomes important because it makes all information
167:
often function as self-directed teams assigned to a specific task which calls for the input and expertise of numerous departments. Assigning a task to a team composed of multi-disciplinary individuals increases the level of creativity and establishes common opinion. Each member offers an alternative
247:
In many cases, the team would make unstructured strategic decisions—such as what markets to compete in, what new production technologies to invest in, and what return on investment to require; tactical decisions like whether to build a prototype, whether to concept-test, whether to test-market, and
243:
Cross-functional teams require information from all levels of management. The teams may have their origins in the perceived need to make primarily strategic decisions, tactical decisions, or operational decisions, but they will require all three types of information. Almost all self-directed teams
264:
Cross-functional teams consist of people from different parts of an organization. Information must be made understandable to all users. Not only engineers use technical data, and not only accountants use financial data, and not only human resources personnel use HR data. Modern organizations lack
321:
Many teams in large organizations face challenges around creating a collaborative atmosphere when dealing with cross-functional dependencies and peers from other functions. The structure of the organizations in general do not support cross-functional collaboration among the teams.
296:
Today many firms have started to opt for a less structured, more interactive approach. One way of implementing this involves using self-directed cross-functional teams. Proponents hope that these teams will develop strategies that will re-define industries and create new
265:
middle managers to combine, sort, and prioritize the data. Technical, financial, marketing, and all other types of information must come in a form that all members of a cross-functional team can understand. This involves reducing the amount of specialized
304:
Cross-functional teams, using unstructured techniques and searching for revolutionary competitive advantages, allegedly require information systems featuring increased interactivity, more flexibility, and the capability of dealing with
171:
Some researchers have viewed cross-functional interactions as cooperative or competitive in nature, while others have argued that organization's functional areas are often forced to compete and cooperate simultaneously with one another
201:
The growth of self-directed cross-functional teams has influenced decision-making processes and organizational structures. Although management theory likes to propound that every type of organizational structure needs to make
160:
departments. Typically, it includes employees from all levels of an organization. Members may also come from outside an organization (in particular, from suppliers, key customers, or consultants).
269:, sorting information based on importance, hiding complex statistical procedures from the users, giving interpretations of results, and providing clear explanations of difficult. 353: 325:
Smooth communication is the base of the cross-functional teams. Team must schedule all meetings, and prepare the agenda for each. Team must know of what is to be discussed.
435:
Luo, Xueming; Slotegraaf, Rebecca J.; Xing, Pan (April 2006). "Cross-Functional "Coopetition":The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition Within Firms".
256:. In other cases, the team would confine itself to tactical and operational decisions. In either case it would need information associated with all three levels. 403: 189:
Some organizations are built around cross-functional workflows by having reporting lines to multiple managers. This type of management is called
53: 478:
Leybourn, E. (2013). Directing the Agile Organisation: A Lean Approach to Business Management. London: IT Governance Publishing: 71–79.
514: 373: 119: 100: 425:
Krajewski, L. J. and L. P. Ritzman. 2005. Operations Management: Processes and Value Chains. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River.
72: 79: 57: 86: 144:, is a group of people with different functional expertise working toward a common goal. It may include people from 68: 46: 338: 183: 157: 368: 348: 290: 310: 253: 223: 176:”) and it is critical to understand how these complex relationships interplay and affect firm performance. 153: 149: 145: 343: 93: 270: 452: 210:, and operational decisions, new procedures have started to emerge that work best with teams. 190: 392: 444: 207: 179: 519: 248:
how much to produce; and structured operational decisions like production scheduling,
508: 298: 282: 17: 488: 414: 306: 219: 173: 35: 363: 358: 469:
Parcon, P. (2006) Develop Your Team Building Skills, Lotus Press, Jan 1, 2006
456: 249: 448: 203: 266: 218:
Up until recently, decision making flowed in one direction. Overall
193:, and such organizations are often called matrix organizations. 164: 29: 301:”. They think that incremental improvements do not suffice. 273:
systems can present complex results in an intuitive manner.
374:
United States Army Futures Command § Cross-functional teams
27:
Group of people with different expertise on the same team
393:
What is a Cross-functional Team? Definition and meaning
354:
Secretary of Defense-Empowered Cross-Functional Teams
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 489:"How We Built A Cross-Functional Team At Uptech" 8: 443:(2). American Marketing Association: 67–80. 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 385: 317:Collaboration in cross-functional teams 313:may one day be useful in this aspect. 7: 58:adding citations to reliable sources 25: 34: 45:needs additional citations for 1: 415:A leadership blog named XFN. 239:Greater depth of information 230:Greater scope of information 182:within a team may depend on 404:Use of XFN as abbreviation 536: 287:The Practice of Management 515:Human resource management 339:Ambidextrous organization 369:Total quality management 349:Organizational structure 291:management by objectives 222:-level objectives drove 311:Artificial intelligence 289:published his views on 224:strategic business unit 136:(XFN), also known as a 69:"Cross-functional team" 260:Greater range of users 142:interdisciplinary team 138:multidisciplinary team 449:10.1509/jmkg.70.2.067 252:purchases, and media 134:cross-functional team 18:Cross-Functional Team 437:Journal of Marketing 54:improve this article 344:Organization design 277:Less goal dominated 214:Less unidirectional 271:Data visualization 191:matrix management 163:Cross-functional 130: 129: 122: 104: 16:(Redirected from 527: 499: 498: 496: 495: 485: 479: 476: 470: 467: 461: 460: 432: 426: 423: 417: 412: 406: 401: 395: 390: 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 103: 62: 38: 30: 21: 535: 534: 530: 529: 528: 526: 525: 524: 505: 504: 503: 502: 493: 491: 487: 486: 482: 477: 473: 468: 464: 434: 433: 429: 424: 420: 413: 409: 402: 398: 391: 387: 382: 335: 319: 279: 262: 241: 232: 216: 199: 180:Decision making 158:human resources 126: 115: 109: 106: 63: 61: 51: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 533: 531: 523: 522: 517: 507: 506: 501: 500: 480: 471: 462: 427: 418: 407: 396: 384: 383: 381: 378: 377: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 351: 346: 341: 334: 331: 318: 315: 278: 275: 261: 258: 240: 237: 231: 228: 215: 212: 198: 195: 128: 127: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 532: 521: 518: 516: 513: 512: 510: 490: 484: 481: 475: 472: 466: 463: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 431: 428: 422: 419: 416: 411: 408: 405: 400: 397: 394: 389: 386: 379: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 336: 332: 330: 326: 323: 316: 314: 312: 308: 302: 300: 299:best practice 294: 292: 288: 285:in 1954 book 284: 283:Peter Drucker 276: 274: 272: 268: 259: 257: 255: 251: 245: 238: 236: 229: 227: 225: 221: 213: 211: 209: 205: 196: 194: 192: 187: 185: 181: 177: 175: 169: 166: 161: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 124: 121: 113: 110:December 2011 102: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: â€“  70: 66: 65:Find sources: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 37: 32: 31: 19: 492:. Retrieved 483: 474: 465: 440: 436: 430: 421: 410: 399: 388: 327: 324: 320: 303: 295: 286: 280: 263: 246: 242: 233: 217: 200: 188: 178: 170: 162: 141: 137: 133: 131: 116: 107: 97: 90: 83: 76: 64: 52:Please help 47:verification 44: 307:fuzzy logic 174:coopetition 509:Categories 494:2020-10-26 380:References 364:Tiger team 359:Task force 254:flightings 154:operations 80:newspapers 457:1547-7185 250:inventory 220:corporate 204:strategic 184:consensus 150:marketing 333:See also 329:crisis. 208:tactical 197:Effects 146:finance 94:scholar 455:  281:Since 267:jargon 156:, and 96:  89:  82:  75:  67:  520:Teams 165:teams 101:JSTOR 87:books 453:ISSN 73:news 445:doi 140:or 56:by 511:: 451:. 441:70 439:. 309:. 206:, 172:(“ 152:, 148:, 132:A 497:. 459:. 447:: 297:“ 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 98:· 91:· 84:· 77:· 50:. 20:)

Index

Cross-Functional Team

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Cross-functional team"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
finance
marketing
operations
human resources
teams
coopetition
Decision making
consensus
matrix management
strategic
tactical
corporate
strategic business unit
inventory
flightings
jargon
Data visualization
Peter Drucker

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑