133:
360:
shown that the price on the date of purchase was inflated because of the misrepresentation." 339 F. 3d, at 938 (emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted). It added that "the injury occurs at the time of the transaction." Ibid. Since the complaint pleaded "that the price at the time of purchase was overstated," and it sufficiently identified the cause, its allegations were legally sufficient. Ibid.
24:
359:
The Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. In the portion of the court's decision now before us—the portion that concerns the spray device claim—the Circuit held that the complaint adequately alleged "loss causation." The Circuit wrote that "plaintiffs establish loss causation if they have
355:
The
District Court dismissed the complaint. In respect to the plaintiffs' drug-profitability claim, it held that the complaint failed adequately to allege an appropriate state of mind, i.e., that defendants had acted knowingly, or the like. In respect to the plaintiffs' spray device claim, it held
461:
377:
174:
41:
363:
Because the Ninth
Circuit's views about loss causation differ from those of other Circuits that have considered this issue, we granted Dura's petition for certiorari.
328:, holding that an inflated purchase price will not by itself constitute or proximately cause the relevant economic loss needed to allege and prove "loss causation."
466:
451:
347:
Respondents are individuals who bought stock in Dura
Pharmaceuticals, on the public securities market between April 15, 1997, and February 24, 1998.
219:
An inflated purchase price will not by itself constitute or proximately cause the relevant economic loss needed to allege and prove "loss causation."
88:
60:
456:
67:
74:
325:
137:
107:
56:
45:
81:
397:
34:
206:
250:
381:
166:
406:
278:
242:
234:
274:
262:
388:
415:
286:
254:
445:
266:
169:
337:
23:
185:
181:
424:
433:
356:
that the complaint failed adequately to allege "loss causation."
203:
132:
17:
324:, 544 U.S. 336 (2005), is a securities fraud decision by the
462:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
307:
299:
294:
223:
213:
198:
193:
161:
156:
151:
144:
125:
48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
8:
122:
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
57:"Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo"
313:109 Stat. 747, 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(b)(4)
120:2005 United States Supreme Court case
7:
374:Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo
321:Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo
126:Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo
46:adding citations to reliable sources
326:Supreme Court of the United States
138:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
467:United States securities case law
452:United States Supreme Court cases
384:336 (2005) is available from:
131:
22:
33:needs additional citations for
457:2005 in United States case law
1:
303:Breyer, joined by unanimous
483:
434:Oyez (oral argument audio)
335:
312:
228:
218:
130:
145:Argued January 12, 2005
147:Decided April 19, 2005
180:125 S. Ct. 1627; 161
42:improve this article
279:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
251:Sandra Day O'Connor
351:Procedural history
239:Associate Justices
317:
316:
235:William Rehnquist
118:
117:
110:
92:
474:
438:
432:
429:
423:
420:
414:
411:
405:
402:
396:
393:
387:
224:Court membership
135:
134:
123:
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
91:
50:
26:
18:
482:
481:
477:
476:
475:
473:
472:
471:
442:
441:
436:
430:
427:
421:
418:
412:
409:
403:
400:
394:
391:
385:
369:
353:
345:
340:
334:
277:
275:Clarence Thomas
265:
263:Anthony Kennedy
253:
243:John P. Stevens
209:(9th Cir. 2003)
189:
146:
140:
121:
114:
103:
97:
94:
51:
49:
39:
27:
12:
11:
5:
480:
478:
470:
469:
464:
459:
454:
444:
443:
440:
439:
407:Google Scholar
368:
367:External links
365:
352:
349:
344:
341:
336:Main article:
333:
330:
315:
314:
310:
309:
305:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
291:
290:
289:
287:Stephen Breyer
255:Antonin Scalia
240:
237:
232:
226:
225:
221:
220:
216:
215:
211:
210:
200:
196:
195:
191:
190:
179:
163:
159:
158:
153:
152:Full case name
149:
148:
142:
141:
136:
128:
127:
119:
116:
115:
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
479:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
449:
447:
435:
426:
417:
408:
399:
398:CourtListener
390:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
366:
364:
361:
357:
350:
348:
342:
339:
331:
329:
327:
323:
322:
311:
306:
302:
298:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:Chief Justice
230:
229:
227:
222:
217:
212:
208:
205:
201:
197:
192:
187:
183:
177:
176:
171:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
150:
143:
139:
129:
124:
112:
109:
101:
98:February 2010
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59: –
58:
54:
53:Find sources:
47:
43:
37:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
373:
362:
358:
354:
346:
320:
319:
318:
308:Laws applied
295:Case opinion
282:
270:
267:David Souter
258:
246:
194:Case history
173:
155:
104:
95:
85:
78:
71:
64:
52:
40:Please help
35:verification
32:
15:
338:Strike suit
446:Categories
425:OpenJurist
332:Background
186:U.S. LEXIS
184:577; 2005
68:newspapers
182:L. Ed. 2d
162:Citations
372:Text of
300:Majority
389:Cornell
214:Holding
82:scholar
437:
431:
428:
422:
419:
416:Justia
413:
410:
404:
401:
395:
392:
386:
285:
283:·
281:
273:
271:·
269:
261:
259:·
257:
249:
247:·
245:
84:
77:
70:
63:
55:
380:
343:Facts
199:Prior
89:JSTOR
75:books
382:U.S.
204:F.3d
202:339
188:3478
175:more
167:U.S.
165:544
61:news
378:544
207:933
170:336
44:by
448::
376:,
178:)
172:(
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
86:·
79:·
72:·
65:·
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
