Knowledge (XXG)

Dear enemy effect

Source 📝

225:), particular common sequences of syllables (phrases) are produced by all males established in the same location (neighbours), whereas males of different locations (strangers) share only few syllables. Playback experiments provided evidence for neighbour–stranger discrimination consistent with the dear enemy effect, indicating that shared sequences were recognised and identified as markers of the group identity. Studies have shown that the dear enemy effect changes during the breeding season of the skylark. Playbacks of neighbour and stranger songs at three periods of the breeding season show that neighbours are dear enemies in the middle of the season, when territories are stable, but not at the beginning of the breeding season, during settlement and pair formation, nor at the end, when bird density increases due to the presence of young birds becoming independent. In song sparrows, where neighbours are most often the sires of extra-pair offspring, males will alter their aggression toward neighbouring males with their female's fertility status. When presented with simulated stranger and neighbour intruders during their female's pre-fertile and post-fertile periods, males displayed the dear enemy effect. However, when presented with simulated stranger and neighbour intruders during their female's fertile period, males exhibited an equal response to both stimuli, likely in order to protect their paternity. Thus, the dear enemy relationship is not a fixed pattern but a flexible one likely to evolve with social and ecological circumstances. 403:) defend territories that consist of a breeding burrow and a display area where they wave their claw to attract females. Burrow-holding males engage in agonistic contests with both intruding males that attempt burrow take-overs and with other territory-holding neighbours that apparently attempt to limit waving or other surface activities of rivals. Contests consist of one or more behavioural elements that range from no claw contact to use of the claw to push, grip, or flip an opponent. In the field, contests with intruders begin at higher intensities and escalate more rapidly than those with neighbours. However, resident–resident contests increase in intensity when burrows are close, neighbours faced each other when exiting burrows, and neighbours were of similar size. Proximity and orientation determine the ease with which a neighbour may be engaged. 132:. Badgers show heightened behavioural responses towards unfamiliar- compared with self-group scents, but there is no difference in response to neighbour- relative to self-group scents. The relative responses towards unfamiliar-group scents are greatest during the breeding seasons, but there is no seasonal differences in the responses to neighbour-group versus self-group scents. In badger populations, levels of aggression between neighbouring territory-holders are likely to be kept relatively low through neighbour recognition. However, increased levels of aggression will be shown towards dispersing or itinerant (alien) badgers, especially during periods such as the breeding season when the potential threats to the long-term fitness of territory owners are greatest. 148: 390: 234: 487:) groups vocalize more and inspect more scent samples in response to olfactory cues of neighbours than strangers. It has been suggested that increased aggression towards neighbours is more common in social species with intense competition between neighbours, as opposed to reduced aggression towards neighbours typical for most solitary species. Furthermore, animals may respond in this way when encounters with intruders from non-neighbouring colonies are rare and of little consequence. 430: 343:) have been demonstrated in the field. Playbacks of non-resident sounds from a given fish's territory elicit a greater response from its nearest neighbour than playbacks of the resident's sound. Testing also included switching the sounds of the two nearest neighbours relative to each respective male's territory. Results demonstrated that all males in the colony individually recognize the sounds of their two nearest neighbours. 262:), can individually recognize neighbours and will increase aggression towards them as the threat to territorial ownership increases. Resident males treat familiar neighbours that had been moved to the opposite boundary to the shared boundary as equally aggressive as strangers. However, residents responded more aggressively towards strangers than towards neighbours on natural territories and also in neutral arena encounters. 1464: 419: 76:
aggressive individual should enjoy greater benefits than a non-aggressive individual when each is faced with a non-aggressive opponent. This stipulation is plausible, as an aggressive individual might enlarge their territory or steal food or matings from a non-aggressive individual. When cooperation involves a cost, a possible mechanism for achieving stable co-operation is
98: 332:) to examine the dear enemy effect. When faced with a familiar neighbour and an unfamiliar intruder simultaneously, residents preferentially confronted the unfamiliar opponent. That is, the establishment of dear enemy recognition between a resident and a neighbour allowed the resident to direct his aggression to the greater competitive threat, i.e. the intruder. 298:), have a large variability in call characteristics and are able to discriminate between neighbouring and unfamiliar conspecifics. Calling is of the longest duration in response to an unfamiliar acoustic stimulus; in contrast, the response to a familiar conspecific call does not show any difference from solitary vocalisations. Terrestrial red-backed salamanders, 379:. Behavioural tests with workers reveal no alarm behaviour or mortality in pairings of workers from the same colony but a full range from no alarm to overt aggression, with associated death, when individuals were paired from different colonies. The level of mortality increases with differences in the composition of 351:
The home ranges of colony living ants often overlap the ranges of other conspecific colonies and colonies of other species. In laboratory experiments, the frequency and severity of agonistic interactions among workers from different colonies increases with the distance between their nests; this has
62:
The ultimate function of the dear enemy effect is to increase the individual fitness of the animal expressing the behaviour. This increase in fitness is achieved by reducing the time, energy or risk of injury unnecessarily incurred by defending a territory or its resources (e.g. mate, food, space)
42:
phenomenon in which two neighbouring territorial animals become less aggressive toward one another once territorial borders are well established. As territory owners become accustomed to their neighbours, they expend less time and energy on defensive behaviors directed toward one another. However,
117:
sniffed both castoreum and anal gland secretion from a stranger longer than from a neighbour. Furthermore, beavers responded aggressively—standing on the mound on their hind feet, pawing, overmarking, or a combination of these—longer to castoreum, but not to anal gland secretion, from a stranger
75:
game. In this view, a territory owner that acts non-aggressively towards a neighbour can be thought of as cooperating, while a territory owner that acts aggressively towards its neighbour can be considered to have defected. A necessary condition for the prisoner’s dilemma game to hold is that an
321:) is dependent on the presence of females. Reduced aggression consistent with dear enemy recognition occurs between conspecific neighbours in the absence of females, but the presence of a female in a male's territory instigates comparably greater aggression between the neighbours. 214:), hoots to defend its territory. Male little owls respond less to their neighbour's hoots played back from the usual location. However, responses to playback of a neighbour from an unusual location are similar to responses to playback of a stranger's hoots from either location. 118:
than from a neighbour. When the mounds containing the scents were allowed to remain overnight and the beavers' responses measured the following morning, the beavers' responses were stronger to both castoreum and anal gland secretion from a stranger than from a neighbour.
46:
The dear enemy effect has been observed in a wide range of animals including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. It can be modulated by factors such as the location of the familiar and unfamiliar animal, the season, and the presence of females.
43:
aggression toward unfamiliar neighbours remains the same. Some authors have suggested the dear enemy effect is territory residents displaying lower levels of aggression toward familiar neighbours compared to unfamiliar individuals who are non-territorial "floaters".
527:) males which live in gangs do not differ in their response behaviour toward neighbouring and stranger males and largely ignore any non-gang member, irrespective of familiarity; that is, they neither show a "dear enemy" nor "nasty neighbour" effect. 849:
Lesbarrèresa, D. and Lodéa, T., (2002). Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution, 14: 287-295.
155:
Audio playback studies are often used to test the dear enemy effect in birds. These studies have demonstrated several bird species respond more aggressively to played back songs of strangers than to songs of neighbours; such species include the
251:), reduced their aggression levels in repeat interactions with familiar rivals and increased their aggression levels towards unfamiliar males. The time taken for interactions to be settled was also lower towards familiar than unfamiliar males. 195:) differ individually in their aggressiveness. Increased aggression by residents towards intruders indicates that residents not only respond to intrinsic aggressiveness of their neighbours, but also to short-term changes in aggression levels. 981:
Brunton, D.H., Evans, B., Cope, T. and Ji, W. (2008). A test of the dear enemy hypothesis in female New Zealand bellbirds (Anthornis melanura): female neighbors as threats. Behavioral Ecology, 19 (4): 791-798. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn027
896:
Hkinzk, J., Foitzik, S., Hippert, A. and Hölldobler, B., (1996). Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology, 102: 510–522. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01143.x
63:
against a familiar animal with its own territory; the territory-holder already knows about the abilities of the neighbour, and also knows that the neighbour is unlikely to try to take over the territory because it already has one.
868:
Leiser, J.K., (2003). When are neighbours ‘dear enemies’ and when are they not? The responses of territorial male variegated pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus, to neighbours, strangers and heterospecifics. Animal Behaviour, 65:
138:
are able to discriminate the odours of familiar neighbours and strangers. It has been suggested that this discrimination may be used by males to avoid unnecessary chases and fights by becoming known to their neighbours.
945:
Kaib1, M., Franke, S., Francke, W. and Brand, R., (2002). Cuticular hydrocarbons in a termite: phenotypes and a neighbour–stranger effect. Physiological Entomology, 27, 189–198. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00292.x
1020:
Maciej, P., Patzelt, A., Ndao, I., Hammerschmidt, K. and Julia Fischer, J., (2013). Social monitoring in a multilevel society: a playback study with male Guinea baboons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 67(1): 61–68. DOI:
479:) are able to recognize a greater proportion of workers from neighbouring colonies as non-colony members. When recognized as non-colony members, more aggression is exhibited toward neighbours than non-neighbours. 80:, where pairs of individuals trade bouts of cooperative behaviour with one another. Dear enemy cooperation could be explained by reciprocal altruism if territorial neighbours use conditional strategies such as 273:), dyads of males behave differently depending on whether the lizards are prior neighbours, with prior neighbours exhibiting less bobbing relative to nodding forms of headbob displays than non-neighbours. 705:
Mollesf, L.E. and Vehrencamp, S.L., (2001). Neighbour recognition by resident males in the banded wren, Thryothorus pleurostictus, a tropical songbird with high song type sharing. Animal Behaviour, 61:
498:) are more aggressive toward the songs of neighbouring females. This is opposite to the dear enemy phenomenon and suggests that neighbouring females pose a greater threat than strangers in this species. 839:
McMann, S. and Paterson, A.V., (2012). Display behavior of resident brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) during close encounters with neighbors and nonneighbors. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 7(1):
639:
VachĂŠ, M., Ferron, J. and Gouat, P., (2001). The ability of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) to discriminate conspecific olfactory signatures. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79: 1296-1300
517:) do not discriminate behaviourally between the calls of neighbours and strangers, and female collared lizards show no difference in their behaviour to neighbouring or unfamiliar females. 302:, defend territories under rocks and logs on the forest floor in the eastern United States. Individuals are more aggressive to unfamiliar salamanders than to familiar individuals. In the 778:
Moser-Purdy, C; MacDougall-Shackleton, E; Mennill, D. J. (2017). "Enemies are not always dear: male song sparrows adjust dear enemy effect expression in response to female fertility".
954:
Pratt, A.E. and McLain, D.K., (2006). How dear is my enemy: Intruder-resident and resident-resident encounters in male sand fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator). Behaviour, 143: 597-617
812:
Briefer, E., Rybak, F. and Aubin, T., (2008). When to be a dear enemy: flexible acoustic relationships of neighbouring skylarks, Alauda arvensis. Animal Behaviour, 76: 1319–1325
878:
Leiser, J.K. and Itzkowitz, M., (1989). The benefits of dear enemy recognition in three-contender convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) contests. Behaviour, 136: 983-1003
411:
A range of studies have found evidence of an effect opposite to the dear enemy effect, i.e. more aggression is shown toward neighbours than strangers. This has been termed the
830:
Husakf, J.F. and Fox, S.F., (2003). Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 65: 391–396
621:
Hyman, J., (2002). Conditional strategies in territorial defense: do Carolina wrens play tit-for-tat? Behavioral Ecology, 13: 664-669. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/13.5.664
1000:
Bard, S., Hau, M., Wikelski, M. and Wingfield, J.C. (2002). Vocal distinctiveness and response to conspecific playback in the spotted antbird. Condor, 104: 387-394
963:
Newey, P.S., Robson, S.K. and Crozier, R.H., (2010). Weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina encounter nasty neighbors rather than dear enemies. Ecology, 91(8):2366-72
370:
have been known to slowly fly into the territory of an adjacent male territory holder in order to test and establish the mutual boundary of their two territories.
1398: 887:
Myrberg, A.A. and Riggio, R.J., (1985). Acoustically mediated individual recognition by a coral reef fish (Pomacentrus partitus). Animal Behaviour, 33: 411–416
1009:
Husak, J.F. and Fox, S.F., (2003). Spatial organisation and the dear enemy phenomenon in adult female collared lizards., Journal of Herpetology, 37, 211-215
306:, there is variability in the nature of the call and the frog presents a more aggressive call to strangers in comparison to the response to its neighbors. 448: 1403: 630:
Palphramand1, K.L. and White, P.C.L., (2007). Badgers, Meles meles, discriminate between neighbour, alien and self scent. Animal Behaviour, 74: 429–436
728:
Briefer, E., Aubin, T., Lehongre, K. and Rybak, F., (2008). How to identify dear enemies: the group signature in the complex song of the skylark
687:
Falls, J.B. and McNicholl, M.K., (1979). Neighbor-stranger discrimination by song in male blue grouse. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57: 457-462
919:
Frankie, Gordon W.; Vinson, S. B.; Lewis, Alcinda (1979-04-01). "Territorial Behavior in Male Xylocopa micans (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae)".
566: 696:
Brindley, E.L., (1991). Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbor recognition and overlapping. Animal Behaviour, 41: 503-512
447: 972:
Müller, C.A. and Manser, M.B., (2007). ‘Nasty neighbours’ rather than ‘dear enemies’ in a social carnivore. Proc. R. Soc. B., 274: 959-965
1010: 612:
Akçay, C. et al., (2009). Good neighbour, bad neighbour: song sparrows retaliate against aggressive rivals. Animal Behaviour, 78: 97–102
1049: 985: 282:) has been observed to be less aggressive towards conspecifics. It also exhibits headbob activity similar to that of the brown anole. 84:. In the tit-for-tat strategy, a subject will cooperate when its partner (neighbour) cooperates and defect when the partner defects. 859:
Jaeger, R. G., (1981). Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. American Naturalist 117: 964-972.
1498: 905:
Langen, T.A., Tripet, F. and Nonacs, P., (2000). The red and the black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert
501:
A range of studies have found no evidence of the dear enemy effect showing the effect is not universal. Territorial males of the
600:
Rosell, F. and Bjørkøyli, T. (2002). A test of the dear enemy phenomenon in the Eurasian beaver. Animal Behaviour, 63: 1073–1078
1107: 821:
Osborne, L., (2005). Rival recognition in the territorial tawny dragon (Ctenophorus decresii). Acta Ethologica, 8: 45-50
439: 1441: 1137: 1488: 1219: 502: 389: 1420: 1312: 1169: 114: 1164: 1434: 1117: 147: 715:
Hardouin, L.A., Tabel, P. and Bretagnolle, V., (2006). Neighbour–stranger discrimination in the little owl,
1092: 1251: 1214: 1204: 1149: 1097: 1042: 650: 255: 51: 674:
Lovell, S.F. (2004). Neighbor-stranger discrimination by song in a suboscine bird, the alder flycatcher,
1503: 354: 303: 54:, in which some species are more aggressive towards their neighbours than towards unfamiliar strangers. 72: 233: 1367: 1357: 1122: 1082: 1077: 491: 1448: 1229: 278: 77: 1362: 1154: 1132: 1112: 983: 928: 795: 101:
Eurasian badgers respond less aggressively to the scent of familiar conspecifics than unfamiliar
1493: 1467: 1174: 1142: 1035: 562: 1427: 1372: 1239: 1072: 787: 755: 157: 202:
birds, it has seldom been investigated in territorial non-passerine species. The nocturnal
1382: 1322: 1307: 1292: 1277: 1246: 1199: 584:
Bee, M.A., (2003). A test of the "dear enemy effect" in the strawberry dart-poison frog (
510: 480: 374: 366: 325: 128:) can discriminate between self-, neighbour- and unfamiliar- group faeces near their main 121: 106: 1347: 1302: 1297: 1179: 1087: 169: 17: 1482: 1352: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1261: 1194: 1102: 989: 520: 399: 135: 799: 1377: 1327: 1287: 1256: 1209: 418: 383: 203: 188: 791: 373:
The dear enemy effect has been reported in colonies of the fungus-growing termite
446: 1317: 1282: 266: 246: 177: 165: 81: 39: 472: 463: 336: 316: 291: 207: 547:(Huxley, J., Hardy, A. and Ford, E., eds). London, Allen and Unwin. pp. 71-83 760: 743: 199: 151:
The little owl hoots less intensively at familiar neighbours than unfamiliar
97: 1189: 1184: 1159: 1058: 360: 932: 732:. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211: 317-326. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.013359 1224: 380: 218: 71:
The interaction between two neighbours can be modelled as an iterated
238: 198:
Although neighbour–stranger discrimination has been reported in many
1127: 744:"Extra-pair paternity, song, and genetic quality in song sparrows" 417: 388: 232: 146: 96: 1234: 129: 1031: 335:
Individual recognition of noises produced males of the bicolor
678:. Behavioral Ecology, 15: 799-804 DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh082 324:
Some researchers have staged three-way contests between male
428: 1027: 909:
ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48: 285-292
596: 594: 543:
Fisher, J., {1954}. Evolution and bird sociality. In:
1412: 1391: 1270: 1065: 588:). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54: 601-610 314:The dear enemy effect in male variegated pupfish ( 244:Males of a territorial lizard, the tawny dragon ( 393:Male sand fiddler crabs attract mates by waving 773: 771: 1399:Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour 1043: 8: 364:ants. In the wild, male bees of the species 921:Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 1404:International Society for Applied Ethology 1050: 1036: 1028: 759: 440:Listen to the strawberry dart-poison frog 561:. Sinauer Associates. pp. 281–282. 608: 606: 536: 461: 580: 578: 7: 407:Nasty neighbour effect or no effect 290:Males of the territorial breeding 237:A brown anole displaying with its 217:During the breeding season of the 50:The effect is the converse of the 25: 850:DOI:10.1080/08927014.2002.9522731 1463: 1462: 462:Problems playing this file? See 444: 254:Another territorial lizard, the 719:. Animal Behaviour, 72: 105–112 27:Territorial behavior in animals 1108:Bee learning and communication 1: 792:10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.01.009 503:strawberry poison-dart frog 422:Strawberry dart-poison frog 113:) presented with a two-way 1520: 1458: 1165:Evolutionary neuroscience 1021:10.1007/s00265-012-1425-1 397:Male sand fiddler crabs ( 330:Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum 276:The Iberian wall lizard ( 182:Thryothorus pleurostictus 1118:Behavioral endocrinology 1499:Evolutionary psychology 1313:Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1093:Animal sexual behaviour 653:Tamiasciurus hudsonicus 651:"Animal Diversity Web - 559:Animal Behavior, 9th Ed 454:Male advertisement call 1252:Tool use by non-humans 1205:Philosophical ethology 1150:Comparative psychology 1098:Animal welfare science 545:Evolution As a Process 433: 423: 413:nasty neighbour effect 394: 256:common collared lizard 241: 152: 102: 52:nasty neighbour effect 36:dear enemy recognition 18:Dear enemy recognition 761:10.1093/beheco/arq171 557:Alcock, John (2009). 515:Hylophylax naevioides 492:New Zealand bellbirds 477:Oecophylla smaragdina 432: 421: 392: 355:Leptothorax nylanderi 236: 150: 100: 1358:William Homan Thorpe 1123:Behavioural genetics 1083:Animal consciousness 1078:Animal communication 376:Macrotermes falciger 341:Pomacentrus partitus 260:Crotaphytus collaris 1113:Behavioural ecology 586:Dendrobates pumilio 507:Dendrobates pumilio 279:Podarcis hispanicus 78:reciprocal altruism 1489:Behavioral ecology 1442:Behavioral Ecology 1363:Nikolaas Tinbergen 1155:Emotion in animals 1133:Cognitive ethology 748:Behavioral Ecology 649:Rubin, C. (2012). 496:Anthornis melanura 434: 424: 395: 386:between colonies. 352:been reported for 304:golden rocket frog 300:Plethodon cinereus 242: 187:Neighbouring male 174:Erithacus rubecula 153: 103: 73:prisoner's dilemma 1476: 1475: 1368:Jakob von UexkĂźll 1138:Comfort behaviour 676:Empidonax alnorum 568:978-0-87893-225-2 449: 193:Melodia melospiza 162:Empidonax alnorum 32:dear enemy effect 16:(Redirected from 1511: 1466: 1465: 1428:Animal Cognition 1421:Animal Behaviour 1373:Wolfgang Wickler 1073:Animal cognition 1052: 1045: 1038: 1029: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1007: 1001: 998: 992: 979: 973: 970: 964: 961: 955: 952: 946: 943: 937: 936: 916: 910: 903: 897: 894: 888: 885: 879: 876: 870: 866: 860: 857: 851: 847: 841: 837: 831: 828: 822: 819: 813: 810: 804: 803: 780:Animal Behaviour 775: 766: 765: 763: 742:Hill, C (2011). 739: 733: 726: 720: 713: 707: 703: 697: 694: 688: 685: 679: 672: 666: 665: 663: 661: 646: 640: 637: 631: 628: 622: 619: 613: 610: 601: 598: 589: 582: 573: 572: 554: 548: 541: 471:Colonies of the 451: 450: 431: 347:In invertebrates 326:convict cichlids 158:alder flycatcher 122:Eurasian badgers 107:Eurasian beavers 21: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1472: 1454: 1408: 1387: 1383:Solly Zuckerman 1323:Karl von Frisch 1308:Richard Dawkins 1293:John B. Calhoun 1278:Patrick Bateson 1266: 1200:Pain in animals 1061: 1056: 1026: 1025: 1019: 1015: 1008: 1004: 999: 995: 980: 976: 971: 967: 962: 958: 953: 949: 944: 940: 918: 917: 913: 904: 900: 895: 891: 886: 882: 877: 873: 867: 863: 858: 854: 848: 844: 838: 834: 829: 825: 820: 816: 811: 807: 777: 776: 769: 741: 740: 736: 730:Alauda arvensis 727: 723: 714: 710: 704: 700: 695: 691: 686: 682: 673: 669: 659: 657: 648: 647: 643: 638: 634: 629: 625: 620: 616: 611: 604: 599: 592: 583: 576: 569: 556: 555: 551: 542: 538: 533: 511:spotted antbird 481:Banded mongoose 469: 468: 460: 458: 457: 456: 455: 452: 445: 442: 435: 429: 409: 367:Xylocopa micans 349: 312: 288: 231: 223:Alauda arvensis 145: 95: 90: 69: 60: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1517: 1515: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1471: 1470: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1438: 1435:Animal Welfare 1431: 1424: 1416: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1407: 1406: 1401: 1395: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1348:Desmond Morris 1345: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1303:Marian Dawkins 1300: 1298:Charles Darwin 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1274: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1265: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1180:Human ethology 1177: 1172: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1088:Animal culture 1085: 1080: 1075: 1069: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1057: 1055: 1054: 1047: 1040: 1032: 1024: 1023: 1013: 1002: 993: 988:2013-06-17 at 974: 965: 956: 947: 938: 927:(2): 313–323. 911: 898: 889: 880: 871: 861: 852: 842: 832: 823: 814: 805: 767: 734: 721: 708: 698: 689: 680: 667: 641: 632: 623: 614: 602: 590: 574: 567: 549: 535: 534: 532: 529: 459: 453: 443: 438: 437: 436: 427: 426: 425: 408: 405: 348: 345: 311: 308: 296:Rana dalmatina 287: 284: 230: 227: 170:European robin 144: 141: 94: 91: 89: 86: 68: 65: 59: 56: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1516: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1484: 1469: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1353:Thomas Sebeok 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1343:Konrad Lorenz 1341: 1339: 1338:Julian Huxley 1336: 1334: 1333:Heini Hediger 1331: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1273: 1269: 1263: 1262:Zoomusicology 1260: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1228: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1195:Neuroethology 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1103:Anthrozoology 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1053: 1048: 1046: 1041: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1006: 1003: 997: 994: 991: 990:archive.today 987: 984: 978: 975: 969: 966: 960: 957: 951: 948: 942: 939: 934: 930: 926: 922: 915: 912: 908: 902: 899: 893: 890: 884: 881: 875: 872: 865: 862: 856: 853: 846: 843: 836: 833: 827: 824: 818: 815: 809: 806: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 774: 772: 768: 762: 757: 753: 749: 745: 738: 735: 731: 725: 722: 718: 717:Athene noctua 712: 709: 702: 699: 693: 690: 684: 681: 677: 671: 668: 656: 655:red squirrel" 654: 645: 642: 636: 633: 627: 624: 618: 615: 609: 607: 603: 597: 595: 591: 587: 581: 579: 575: 570: 564: 560: 553: 550: 546: 540: 537: 530: 528: 526: 522: 521:Guinea baboon 518: 516: 512: 508: 504: 499: 497: 493: 488: 486: 482: 478: 474: 467: 465: 441: 420: 416: 414: 406: 404: 402: 401: 400:Uca pugilator 391: 387: 385: 382: 378: 377: 371: 369: 368: 363: 362: 357: 356: 346: 344: 342: 338: 333: 331: 327: 322: 320: 318: 309: 307: 305: 301: 297: 293: 286:In amphibians 285: 283: 281: 280: 274: 272: 271:Anolis sagrei 268: 263: 261: 257: 252: 250: 248: 240: 235: 228: 226: 224: 220: 215: 213: 212:Athene noctua 209: 205: 201: 196: 194: 190: 189:song sparrows 185: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 149: 142: 140: 137: 136:Red squirrels 133: 131: 127: 123: 119: 116: 112: 108: 99: 92: 87: 85: 83: 79: 74: 66: 64: 57: 55: 53: 48: 44: 41: 37: 33: 19: 1504:Sociobiology 1447: 1440: 1433: 1426: 1419: 1378:E. O. Wilson 1328:Jane Goodall 1288:Donald Broom 1257:Zoosemiotics 1210:Sociobiology 1016: 1005: 996: 977: 968: 959: 950: 941: 924: 920: 914: 906: 901: 892: 883: 874: 864: 855: 845: 835: 826: 817: 808: 783: 779: 751: 747: 737: 729: 724: 716: 711: 701: 692: 683: 675: 670: 658:. Retrieved 652: 644: 635: 626: 617: 585: 558: 552: 544: 539: 524: 519: 514: 506: 500: 495: 489: 485:Mungos mungo 484: 476: 470: 412: 410: 398: 396: 384:hydrocarbons 375: 372: 365: 359: 353: 350: 340: 334: 329: 323: 315: 313: 299: 295: 289: 277: 275: 270: 264: 259: 253: 245: 243: 222: 216: 211: 197: 192: 186: 181: 176:), and male 173: 161: 154: 134: 125: 120: 111:Castor fiber 110: 105:Territorial 104: 70: 61: 49: 45: 35: 31: 29: 1318:Dian Fossey 1283:Marc Bekoff 1271:Ethologists 525:Papio papio 267:brown anole 247:Ctenophorus 229:In reptiles 178:banded wren 166:blue grouse 126:Meles meles 82:tit for tat 40:ethological 1483:Categories 1220:Structures 1215:Stereotypy 531:References 509:) and the 473:weaver ant 464:media help 337:damselfish 319:variegatus 317:Cyprinodon 292:agile frog 208:little owl 93:In mammals 88:Occurrence 1449:Behaviour 1392:Societies 1230:Honeycomb 786:: 17–22. 754:: 73–81. 381:cuticular 200:passerine 67:Mechanism 1494:Ethology 1468:Category 1413:Journals 1240:Instinct 1190:Learning 1185:Instinct 1160:Ethogram 1143:Grooming 1066:Branches 1059:Ethology 986:Archived 933:25083909 907:Pheidole 800:53273443 660:June 15, 361:Pheidole 269:lizard ( 249:decresii 164:), male 143:In birds 58:Function 1170:Feeding 869:453–462 706:119–127 490:Female 310:In fish 265:In the 219:skylark 931:  798:  565:  239:dewlap 206:, the 204:raptor 115:choice 38:is an 1247:Swarm 1175:Hover 1128:Breed 929:JSTOR 840:27−37 796:S2CID 1235:Nest 1225:Hive 662:2013 563:ISBN 358:and 130:sett 30:The 788:doi 784:126 756:doi 184:). 34:or 1485:: 925:52 923:. 794:. 782:. 770:^ 752:22 750:. 746:. 605:^ 593:^ 577:^ 415:. 168:, 1051:e 1044:t 1037:v 935:. 802:. 790:: 764:. 758:: 664:. 571:. 523:( 513:( 505:( 494:( 483:( 475:( 466:. 339:( 328:( 294:( 258:( 221:( 210:( 191:( 180:( 172:( 160:( 124:( 109:( 20:)

Index

Dear enemy recognition
ethological
nasty neighbour effect
prisoner's dilemma
reciprocal altruism
tit for tat

Eurasian beavers
choice
Eurasian badgers
sett
Red squirrels

alder flycatcher
blue grouse
European robin
banded wren
song sparrows
passerine
raptor
little owl
skylark

dewlap
Ctenophorus
common collared lizard
brown anole
Podarcis hispanicus
agile frog
golden rocket frog

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑