Knowledge (XXG)

Flat organization

Source 📝

210:, which also has rotating, not permanent, team leaders - which Valve terms "group contributors", in recognition of the fact that contributing individually and leading at Valve form a spectrum, not a binary dichotomy. Generally the term of a group contributor at Valve is at most one project, after which time they (voluntarily) rotate back to being an individual contributor. Valve also allows team members to work on whatever they find interesting. This is known as 214:, and means that employees can switch to another team at any time, no questions asked; all desks are on wheels to make this easy. However, because new ideas may require significant resources, someone with a new idea may need to persuade a number of their coworkers to join them in order to create a new team and reach the necessary "critical mass" for the new idea to come to fruition. 225:, who has studied Valve and other examples of "non-leadership", believes that Valve works because it hires high-calibre people who are a good fit for the leaderless environment, and because it was founded as a flat organization from the outset, so that new hires always knew what they were getting into. However, he warns that the 74:
In flat organizations, the number of people directly supervised by each manager is large, and the number of people in the chain of command above each person is small. A manager in a flat organization possesses more responsibility than a manager in a tall organization because there is a greater number
355:
argues that new power dynamics can emerge that undermine the equality afforded by a non-hierarchical context. When an organization decides to no longer place value on a person's position, Baker suggests that new hierarchies based on personality type, skill set, and communication style can emerge.
186:
procedures. However, due to the fact that significant responsibilities are given to the team members themselves, if a team collectively arrives at the view that the procedures it is following are outdated, or could be improved, it may be able to change them. Such changes may, in some cases, require
124:
Australian researchers Dunford, Bramble and Littler note that delayering in an organisation may also lead to down-sizing: "lthough delayering need not involve down-sizing - because it is possible to redefine the position of existing staff within the new flatter structure - the two often coincide".
158:
An organization with self-managing teams who organize their own work without the need for a middle manager or supervisor above the team may meet or closely approximate this model. While a manager in self-managing teams determines the overall purpose or goal of the team, the team is at liberty to
83:
Empirical evidence from Ghiselli and Johnson suggests that the amount of independence that managers in flat organizations possess as a result of the flat organizational structure satisfies many of their needs in terms of autonomy and self-realization. The idea behind flat organizations is that
54:
and executives. An organizational structure refers to the nature of the distribution of the units and positions within it, and also to the nature of the relationships among those units and positions. Tall and flat organizations differ based on how many levels of management are present in the
100:
This structure is generally possible only in smaller organizations or individual units within larger organizations. Having reached a critical size, organizations can retain a streamlined structure but cannot keep a completely flat manager-to-staff relationship without affecting
359:
Mark Henricks, a business journalist and a critic of flat organization, argues that "when you have too little hierarchy, decisions don't get made or are made wrongly by employees who lack experience, accountability, or motivation to do the work of the missing managers".
289:
involves teams self-managing to a large extent (though agile development is commonly still practiced within a hierarchical organization, which means that certain types of decisions such as hiring, firing, and pay raises remain the prerogative of managers). In
109:
responsibilities may also require a more conventional structure. A company would not have to give a raise or promotion, based on service length but on greater productivity. Also eliminating certain departments from the payroll means saving money.
302:
a management role as such, but is a role that involves helping remove obstacles to progress and ensuring that the basic scrum framework is adhered to by all parties, inside and outside the team - both aspects of the role being more akin to
787:
Baker, Suzanne J. 2015. "Exploration of Equality and Processes of Non-Hierarchical Groups." Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change 12, no. 2: 138-158. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed November 3,
75:
of individuals immediately below them who are dependent on direction, help, and support. Moreover, managers in a flat organization rely less on guidance from superiors because the number of superiors above the manager is limited.
96:
by many layers of management. Delayering plans may aim to secure these benefits, although potential risks include undermining employee's confidence in their managers and putting the remaining managers under greater pressure.
167:, which may not be available within the organization due to its flat structure. However, alternative "horizontal" career paths may be available, such as developing greater expertise in a role or 246:, a Finnish software and design consultancy with 400 employees that has a flat hierarchy and self-managing teams and also shares all the relevant business numbers with all of their employees 487: 356:
If these hierarchies don't get acknowledged, it is much more difficult to address the emergence of a new hierarchy because they remain implicit or undetected.
623: 240:
Qamcom Research and Technology, a Swedish specialist company with 125 employees active in the area of communication, radar and automotive systems (40% PhDs).
148:
may lack middle managers because there are too few staff to justify hiring middle managers; in this type of organization, the business owner or the
117:
decision-making processes. By elevating the level of responsibility of baseline employees and eliminating layers of middle management, comments and
705: 844: 195:
for corporate clients). If executive management is not involved in the decision, or merely rubber-stamps it, this might be an example of
461:
Ghiselli, Edwin E.; Siegel, Jacob P. (December 1, 1972). "Leadership and Managerial Success in Tall and Flat Organization Structures".
429:
Ghiselli, Edwin E.; Siegel, Jacob P. (December 1, 1972). "Leadership and Managerial Success in Tall and Flat Organization Structures".
812: 545: 258:, which, like Valve, uses open allocation. However, in response to criticism, GitHub introduced a layer of middle management in 2014. 863: 329:, Klint Finley has argued that "bossless" companies like Valve might suffer from problems related to the appropriate handling of 325: 233:
system Valve uses for determining employee remuneration, might become problematic if in the future Valve becomes short of cash.
691:"Work with cutting-edge technology in challenging projects to create lasting value – together with other extraordinary people" 868: 571: 276:(Marc Rich & Co. AG), once the world's largest commodity group. Marc Rich + Co. utilized a flat management structure. 733: 291: 294:, an agile framework, team members assign work to be done among themselves, either by free choice or by consensus. The 873: 407: 504: 633: 182:
An absence of middle managers does not preclude the adoption and retention of mandatory work procedures, including
121:
reach all personnel involved in decisions more quickly. Expected response to customer feedback becomes more rapid.
591: 384: 217:
Valve's co-founder has admitted that it has issues with failing to catch bad decisions early on due to a lack of
196: 155:
However, some organizations do not take on middle managers even as they become larger, remaining extremely flat.
59: 267: 102: 43: 304: 252:, which has rotating, not permanent, team leaders. Some other digital agencies also use rotating team leads. 311:. Agile frameworks such as scrum have also begun being used in non-technology companies and organizations. 352: 222: 817: 738: 402: 346: 261: 200: 330: 841: 822: 567: 286: 243: 207: 188: 183: 47: 470: 438: 218: 203:
at the level of a team - or group of teams, if multiple teams are involved in the decision.
164: 159:
manage the methods by which to achieve that goal. This can cause conflict with people whose
145: 114: 848: 766: 596: 308: 211: 89: 152:
may perform some of the functions performed by middle managers in larger organizations.
474: 442: 191:
management and/or customers (consider, for example, a digital agency producing bespoke
857: 230: 628: 376:
is highly decentralised. Some co-operatives use flat organization, but some do not.
369: 338: 295: 255: 761: 663: 226: 560: 528: 396: 334: 320: 93: 826: 390: 379: 249: 236:
Other examples of companies with self-managing teams include the following:
106: 51: 387:– a highly hierarchical organization is the opposite of a flat organization 17: 668: 273: 192: 118: 176: 168: 85: 529:"Gain and Pain: The Effects of Australian Public Sector Restructuring" 132:, argues that the horizontal structure "delivers value to customers". 710: 342: 160: 88:
will be more productive when they are more directly involved in the
172: 113:
The flat organization model promotes employee involvement through
535:, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Jun., 1998), pp. 388, accessed 1 December 2020 797:
Henricks, M. (2005). Falling Flat?. Entrepreneur, 33(1), 69-70.
206:
The foremost example of a company with self-managing teams is
149: 813:"There's a War on Middle Management and Tesla Just Joined It" 690: 140:
A "strong form" of flat organization is an organization with
55:
organization and how much control managers are endowed with.
762:"Why Workers Can Suffer in Bossless Companies Like GitHub" 221:, due to its lack of managers. Prof. Cliff Oswick from 664:"Valve: How going boss-free empowered the games-maker" 527:Richard Dunford, Tom Bramble and Craig R. Littler, 618: 616: 614: 559: 505:"The Advantages of Flat Organizational Structure" 734:"Harassment claims make startup GitHub grow up" 706:"The Fourth Qualification For Future Companies" 424: 422: 8: 657: 655: 653: 651: 456: 454: 452: 562:Making the team : a guide for managers 533:Public Productivity & Management Review 333:, the formation of informal cliques, the " 418: 62:into a flat organization is known as 7: 585: 583: 270:, which has no supervising managers 704:Appelo, Jurgen (29 October 2015). 624:"Why There Are No Bosses at Valve" 475:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1972.tb02304.x 443:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1972.tb02304.x 264:, which also uses open allocation. 175:, and/or receiving pay raises for 25: 662:Leo Kelion (23 September 2013). 326:The Tyranny of Structurelessness 842:Flatten the pyramid (about.com) 760:Finley, Klint (20 March 2014). 632:. 27 April 2012. Archived from 732:Evelyn, Rusli (17 July 2014). 494:, CIPS Procurement Topic, n.d. 1: 811:Walker, Sam (May 18, 2018). 492:Flat/Horizontal Organisation 163:path expectations include a 92:process rather than closely 590:Fried, Jason (April 2011). 546:The Horizontal Organisation 142:no middle management at all 130:The Horizontal Organisation 890: 592:"Why I Run a Flat Company" 548:, accessed 9 December 2020 509:Small Business - Chron.com 372:, in which organizational 337:" of popular employees, un 385:Hierarchical organization 281:Related business concepts 197:consensus decision-making 60:hierarchical organization 46:with few or no levels of 864:Organizational structure 558:Thompson, Leigh (2000). 408:Workers' self-management 268:The Morning Star Company 70:Organizational structure 44:organizational structure 27:Organizational structure 345:attitudes, and lack of 36:horizontal organization 58:Transforming a highly 869:Types of organization 544:Ostroff, F. (1999), 463:Personnel Psychology 431:Personnel Psychology 399:(dynamic governance) 223:Cass Business School 818:Wall Street Journal 739:Wall Street Journal 403:Workplace democracy 347:workplace diversity 201:workplace democracy 136:Self-managing teams 874:Employee relations 847:2008-09-21 at the 128:Frank Ostroff, in 636:on April 30, 2012 323:'s famous essay 307:than to top-down 298:role in scrum is 287:agile development 219:internal controls 184:quality assurance 48:middle management 32:flat organization 16:(Redirected from 881: 830: 798: 795: 789: 785: 779: 778: 776: 774: 757: 751: 750: 748: 746: 729: 723: 722: 720: 718: 701: 695: 694: 687: 681: 680: 678: 676: 659: 646: 645: 643: 641: 620: 609: 608: 606: 604: 587: 578: 577: 565: 555: 549: 542: 536: 525: 519: 518: 516: 515: 501: 495: 485: 479: 478: 458: 447: 446: 426: 353:Suzanne J. Baker 187:the approval of 146:small businesses 21: 889: 888: 884: 883: 882: 880: 879: 878: 854: 853: 849:Wayback Machine 838: 833: 810: 806: 804:Further reading 801: 796: 792: 786: 782: 772: 770: 759: 758: 754: 744: 742: 731: 730: 726: 716: 714: 703: 702: 698: 689: 688: 684: 674: 672: 661: 660: 649: 639: 637: 622: 621: 612: 602: 600: 589: 588: 581: 574: 557: 556: 552: 543: 539: 526: 522: 513: 511: 503: 502: 498: 486: 482: 460: 459: 450: 428: 427: 420: 416: 366: 317: 309:micromanagement 285:In technology, 283: 274:Marc Rich + Co. 212:open allocation 138: 90:decision-making 81: 72: 34:(also known as 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 887: 885: 877: 876: 871: 866: 856: 855: 852: 851: 837: 836:External links 834: 832: 831: 807: 805: 802: 800: 799: 790: 780: 752: 724: 696: 682: 647: 610: 579: 572: 550: 537: 520: 496: 480: 448: 417: 415: 412: 411: 410: 405: 400: 394: 388: 382: 377: 365: 362: 316: 313: 282: 279: 278: 277: 271: 265: 259: 253: 247: 241: 137: 134: 80: 77: 71: 68: 40:flat hierarchy 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 886: 875: 872: 870: 867: 865: 862: 861: 859: 850: 846: 843: 840: 839: 835: 828: 824: 820: 819: 814: 809: 808: 803: 794: 791: 784: 781: 769: 768: 763: 756: 753: 741: 740: 735: 728: 725: 713: 712: 707: 700: 697: 692: 686: 683: 671: 670: 665: 658: 656: 654: 652: 648: 635: 631: 630: 625: 619: 617: 615: 611: 599: 598: 593: 586: 584: 580: 575: 569: 564: 563: 554: 551: 547: 541: 538: 534: 530: 524: 521: 510: 506: 500: 497: 493: 489: 484: 481: 476: 472: 468: 464: 457: 455: 453: 449: 444: 440: 436: 432: 425: 423: 419: 413: 409: 406: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 383: 381: 378: 375: 371: 368: 367: 363: 361: 357: 354: 350: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 327: 322: 314: 312: 310: 306: 301: 297: 293: 288: 280: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 238: 237: 234: 232: 231:stack ranking 228: 224: 220: 215: 213: 209: 204: 202: 198: 194: 190: 185: 180: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 156: 153: 151: 147: 143: 135: 133: 131: 126: 122: 120: 116: 115:decentralized 111: 108: 104: 98: 95: 91: 87: 84:well-trained 78: 76: 69: 67: 65: 61: 56: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 816: 793: 783: 771:. Retrieved 765: 755: 743:. Retrieved 737: 727: 717:13 September 715:. Retrieved 709: 699: 685: 673:. Retrieved 667: 638:. Retrieved 634:the original 629:BusinessWeek 627: 595: 561: 553: 540: 532: 523: 512:. Retrieved 508: 499: 491: 483: 466: 462: 434: 430: 373: 370:Co-operative 358: 351: 339:professional 324: 318: 305:facilitation 299: 296:scrum master 284: 235: 216: 205: 181: 157: 154: 141: 139: 129: 127: 123: 112: 103:productivity 99: 82: 73: 63: 57: 39: 35: 31: 29: 640:1 September 319:Drawing on 256:GitHub Inc. 227:peer-review 858:Categories 601:Retrieved 573:0130143634 514:2015-11-22 469:(4): 618. 437:(4): 617. 414:References 397:Sociocracy 335:soft power 331:grievances 321:Jo Freeman 315:Criticisms 105:. Certain 94:supervised 64:delayering 18:Delayering 827:0099-9660 675:1 October 391:Open plan 380:Holacracy 374:ownership 262:Treehouse 250:37Signals 189:executive 165:promotion 107:financial 845:Archived 669:BBC News 364:See also 193:websites 119:feedback 79:Benefits 50:between 42:) is an 773:13 July 745:18 July 393:offices 244:Reaktor 229:-based 177:loyalty 169:mastery 144:. Very 86:workers 825:  788:2015). 711:Forbes 570:  343:sexist 161:career 767:Wired 603:1 Sep 292:scrum 208:Valve 173:craft 171:of a 52:staff 823:ISSN 775:2014 747:2014 719:2016 677:2013 642:2013 605:2013 597:Inc. 568:ISBN 488:CIPS 341:and 471:doi 439:doi 300:not 199:or 150:CEO 38:or 860:: 821:. 815:. 764:. 736:. 708:. 666:. 650:^ 626:. 613:^ 594:. 582:^ 566:. 531:, 507:. 490:, 467:25 465:. 451:^ 435:25 433:. 421:^ 349:. 179:. 66:. 30:A 829:. 777:. 749:. 721:. 693:. 679:. 644:. 607:. 576:. 517:. 477:. 473:: 445:. 441:: 20:)

Index

Delayering
organizational structure
middle management
staff
hierarchical organization
workers
decision-making
supervised
productivity
financial
decentralized
feedback
small businesses
CEO
career
promotion
mastery
craft
loyalty
quality assurance
executive
websites
consensus decision-making
workplace democracy
Valve
open allocation
internal controls
Cass Business School
peer-review
stack ranking

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.