Knowledge

Otok (administrative unit)

Source 📝

66:), which means "camp" or "department" in Mongolian. Soviet scientists have confirmed that this word originally came from the Sogdian "otak", which originally meant "land" and "region". The researcher of Inner Mongolia Hu Alateng Ula believes that this word, including the Sogdian "otak", comes from the Hunnic "Ou Tu", which was originally the first level of the organization of the social management of the 79:, the otok already existed, and they included about 10,000 villages. It is important to understand that the otok is not a union of blood relatives, but the people who were at the head were not tribal elders. Otok was only a nomadic 193: 72: 275: 253:Самаев Г. П. «ГОРНЫЙ АЛТАЙ В XVII — СЕРЕДИНЕ XIX В.: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ИСТОРИИ И ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЯ К РОССИИ». Page 171. 242:Самаев Г. П. «ГОРНЫЙ АЛТАЙ В XVII — СЕРЕДИНЕ XIX В.: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ИСТОРИИ И ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЯ К РОССИИ». Page 198. 280: 155: 131: 129: 102:, similar to the concept of "volost", during the transition from Dzungarian influence to Russian citizenship. 52:. In feudal dependence on otok there were people from various clans connected by the unity of the territory. 230: 270: 117: 115: 86:
In the Manchurian period, the Otoks were replaced by the Hoshuns. In the XVIII and XIX centuries, the
75:
assumed that the "otok" of the Mongols appeared a long time ago. For example, during the reign of
197: 34: 17: 185: 220:Бакаева Э.П. Проблемы этногенеза и этнической культуры тюрко-монгольских народов, Page 169. 177: 91: 264: 147: 76: 252: 241: 219: 136:Златкин И. Я., История Джунгарского ханства (1635-1758), М., 1964, Page 79-81. 135: 121: 189: 87: 99: 49: 46: 122:Владимирцов Б. Я., Обществ. строй монголов, Л., 1934, Page 132, 139-140. 67: 94:
in power. Later these lands became part of Russia and became known as
95: 42: 90:
had only two otoks, which had limited sovereignty. These Otoks had
80: 210:И.Я. Златкин, С.К. Рощин "Общественные науки в МНР", Page 51. 98:. An administrative unit of self-government among the 60:"Otok" is a translation of the Mongolian "otog" ( 83:. In some cases, otok was like a principality. 61: 8: 231:Narody Azii i Afriki. Issue 2–6, Page 89. 111: 7: 25: 18:Draft:Otok (administrative unit) 184:(3). Translated by 高玉虎: 81–86. 158:from the original on 2022-08-31 1: 276:Mongolian words and phrases 297: 73:Shagdarzhavyn Natsagdorzh 62: 38: 281:Subdivisions of Mongolia 27:Administrative unit 16:(Redirected from 288: 255: 250: 244: 239: 233: 228: 222: 217: 211: 208: 202: 201: 176:胡·阿拉腾乌拉 (1990). 173: 167: 166: 164: 163: 144: 138: 133: 124: 119: 65: 64: 40: 21: 296: 295: 291: 290: 289: 287: 286: 285: 261: 260: 259: 258: 251: 247: 240: 236: 229: 225: 218: 214: 209: 205: 182:内蒙古民族大学学报:社会科学版 175: 174: 170: 161: 159: 146: 145: 141: 134: 127: 120: 113: 108: 58: 45:inheritance in 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 294: 292: 284: 283: 278: 273: 263: 262: 257: 256: 245: 234: 223: 212: 203: 178:"简论"瓯脱"的起源与发展" 168: 154:. 2022-07-06. 139: 125: 110: 109: 107: 104: 57: 54: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 293: 282: 279: 277: 274: 272: 271:Mongol Empire 269: 268: 266: 254: 249: 246: 243: 238: 235: 232: 227: 224: 221: 216: 213: 207: 204: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 172: 169: 157: 153: 149: 143: 140: 137: 132: 130: 126: 123: 118: 116: 112: 105: 103: 101: 97: 93: 89: 84: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 55: 53: 51: 48: 44: 36: 32: 19: 248: 237: 226: 215: 206: 181: 171: 160:. Retrieved 151: 142: 85: 71: 59: 30: 29: 77:Kublai Khan 56:Description 265:Categories 198:1002881836 162:2022-08-31 106:References 33:(or Otog, 190:1671-0215 152:鄂尔多斯市人民政府 88:Telengits 35:Mongolian 156:Archived 100:Altaians 50:Mongolia 47:medieval 148:"鄂托克前旗" 96:volosts 92:zaisans 68:Xiongnu 41:) is a 196:  188:  43:feudal 194:NSSD 186:ISSN 81:fief 63:ᠣᠲᠣᠭ 39:отог 31:Otok 267:: 192:. 180:. 150:. 128:^ 114:^ 37:: 200:. 165:. 20:)

Index

Draft:Otok (administrative unit)
Mongolian
feudal
medieval
Mongolia
Xiongnu
Shagdarzhavyn Natsagdorzh
Kublai Khan
fief
Telengits
zaisans
volosts
Altaians


Владимирцов Б. Я., Обществ. строй монголов, Л., 1934, Page 132, 139-140.


Златкин И. Я., История Джунгарского ханства (1635-1758), М., 1964, Page 79-81.
"鄂托克前旗"
Archived
"简论"瓯脱"的起源与发展"
ISSN
1671-0215
NSSD
1002881836
Бакаева Э.П. Проблемы этногенеза и этнической культуры тюрко-монгольских народов, Page 169.
Narody Azii i Afriki. Issue 2–6, Page 89.
Самаев Г. П. «ГОРНЫЙ АЛТАЙ В XVII — СЕРЕДИНЕ XIX В.: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ИСТОРИИ И ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЯ К РОССИИ». Page 198.
Самаев Г. П. «ГОРНЫЙ АЛТАЙ В XVII — СЕРЕДИНЕ XIX В.: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ИСТОРИИ И ПРИСОЕДИНЕНИЯ К РОССИИ». Page 171.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.