257:. The discussion that followed was short, as the government was more focused on the issues of India. By February 1860, following the EIC’s abolishment and control of the Settlements passing to the India Office, parliament agreed to the transfer of the Settlements to the Crown. Yet the transfer was not immediate, and what would follow would be a seven-year long negotiation process between state departments over issues related to the Settlements’ defence and debts. Finally, the Government of the Straits Settlements Act was passed on 10 August 1866, and on 1 April 1867, the Straits Settlements are formally handed over to the Crown.
250:
also claimed that despite distinct circumstances, the
Settlements were governed as if it was in continental India, and had their concerns consistently overlooked. They also argued that they were failed to be provided with adequate representation and judicial support. They highlighted grievances regarding damaging trade measures, ineffective policies toward the Chinese secret societies, and the use of Singapore as a convict station, ultimately requesting to be made a separate dependency of the Crown.
145:
different settlements had rivalries with each other. However, once the
Settlements were reduced to a residency, a commercial consciousness began to develop, leading to a collective identity that included other European businessmen in the Straits. It was within this European merchant community that early movements for transfer emerged. United in opposition to unpopular policies set by the Calcutta government, they would also rally their allies in
187:, to lead their petition in London. Crawfurd, who had previously led several delegations on behalf of the merchants, encountered strong resistance, resulting in protracted negations. Despite their efforts, the currency bill still passed. However, widespread discontent with this policy and strong pressure from the Settlements ultimately led to the petition that resulted in the transfer with Crawfurd spearheading the movement in London.
308:, the EIC refrained from interfering with local politics, objecting to anything that could add to their responsibilities in Malaya, such as territorial expansion and wars, allowing them to minimise spending. However, following the transfer, adherence to this policy was repealed. The British would increase their interventions in local politics to secure their rule eventually leading to the
132:
significant geographical distance between the
Settlements and Calcutta, meant that the Straits administration struggled to communicate and collaborate effectively with the government. As a result, their ability to govern the settlements was severely limited. These challenges would lay the groundwork for further issues, fuelling frustrations within the European mercantile community.
233:. The weak police forces were were unable to control these large societies, notorious for causing riots and violence. Despite ongoing appeals for the improvement of the police force, little significant action was taken the EIC. This ineffectiveness became a major complaint of merchants’ petition for transfer, expressing concerns about threats to property and safety.
162:
Following the establishment of the settlements, a series of unpopular taxes and monetary policies generated considerable dissent within the merchant community. These directives, initiated by the
Calcutta government, were often formulated with India in mind, lacking consideration for local issues. The
225:
and enacted in
Calcutta; however, they were perceived as unsuitable for the Straits Settlements, as they did not account for local customs and circumstances. Furthermore, the lack of funding and support from the EIC resulted in a small ineffective police force and a broken prison system, leaving the
65:
The demand for transfer was primarily driven by the
European mercantile community in the Settlements who were dissatisfied with the existing administration. Key issues contributing to this discontent were over governance, representation, financial policies, and the use of the Settlements as a penal
131:
As the EIC'S primary interest in the
Straits Settlements was to defend and enhance their monopoly on trade with China, the enactment of this act effectively nullified this interest. This shift, along with the absence of representation for the Straits administration in the Bengal government and the
115:
would remain the same till the 1867 transfer. This government had a reduced staff, compromising only eight personnel as compared to the nineteen during its time as a presidency. The settlements’ chief administrator held the title of governor, however, he lacked real authority due to his relatively
249:
By mid-October 1857, the petition was signed by most of
Singapore’s European community. Addressed to the British parliament, the petition highlighted the community’s disappointment with the limited change brought by the Settlement’s 1851 transition to a direct dependency of Indian government. It
245:
In
September 1857, in response to further unpopular financial policies, a surge of violence involving convicts and Chinese secret societies, and the outbreak of the Indian Mutiny, a public meeting of the European merchant community was convened. The purpose of this meeting was to consider whether
199:
and the fear of Indian convicts. From the establishment of the
Settlements till its transfer, the EIC would continuously ship Indian convicts from India to the Settlements to serve their sentences. The Indian convicts eventually became a crucial part of development of the Straits Settlements by
144:
that settled in the Straits Settlements generated their income from areas such as shipping, banking, plantation investment, and the trade of Malay and Chinese goods. Prior to Penang’s loss of presidency, the merchants saw themselves as separate groups, to the extent that merchant communities in
87:
united the colonies of Penang, Malacca, and Singapore to form the Straits Settlements. This action was an attempt by the EIC to reduce expenses by making the existing presidency of Penang financially self-sufficient. Despite this, in 1830, financial woes let the EIC to remove the Settlements’
241:
In August 1855, the idea of transferring the Straits Settlements to the Colonial Office was raised for the first time at a public meeting of merchant firms in Singapore. This meeting was convened over issues of currency, convicts, and the EIC’s disinterest in Singapore. While the motion was
246:
they would support the petition of Culcatta’s residents to end the EIC and transfer India directly to Crown rule. The consensus was unanimous, they resolved to support the petition and also to petition for the Settlements to be governed by the Crown.
269:
in Singapore. The island’s town declared a holiday, and the European and Asian communities gathered for the formal inauguration of the colony at the Singapore Town Hall. As the Settlements were now a Crown Colony, they were given a Crown Colony
289:, would find himself in contention with the European community that had expected more influence than the Crown Colony constitution provided. He would also face issues over administration, taxes, and official relationships with the Malay states,
178:
long before British settlement. The merchants feared that this new currency would not be accepted by Malay and Chinese traders, and thus believed that the change would negatively impact their profits. In response, the merchants enlisted
203:
Initially, the merchant community had no fear of the convicts; their only resentment came from the cost associated with keeping the convicts under guard. While there were instances of violence from the convicts, fears only rose when the
208:
began in May of 1857. Concern over the rising number of convicts, including some mutineers being transferred to the Settlements, fuelled fears of potential violence and thus influence the merchants to back the transfer petition.
593:
Abraham, Andrew (2002). "The Transfer Of The Straits Settlements: A Revisionist Approach To The Study Of Colonial Law And Administration". Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 42: 9–11 – via
828:
ABRAHAM, ANDREW (2002). "The Transfer Of The Straits Settlements: A Revisionist Approach To The Study Of Colonial Law And Administration". Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 42: 8– via
128:
but also consolidated legislative and administrative powers within the government of Bengal. Consequently, all significant matters and policy decisions had to be relayed to Calcutta for resolution.
510:
Webster, Anthony (July 2011). "The Development of British Commercial and Political Networks in the Straits Settlements 1800 to 1868: The Rise of a Colonial and Regional Economic Identity?".
484:
Webster, Anthony (July 2011). "The Development of British Commercial and Political Networks in the Straits Settlements 1800 to 1868: The Rise of a Colonial and Regional Economic Identity?".
466:
Webster, Anthony (July 2011). "The Development of British Commercial and Political Networks in the Straits Settlements 1800 to 1868: The Rise of a Colonial and Regional Economic Identity?".
944:
Webster, Anthony. “The Development of British Commercial and Political Networks in the Straits Settlements 1800 to 1868: The Rise of a Colonial and Regional Economic Identity?”
167:
and sending group delegations to the British parliament for negotiations. The success of these efforts varied, sometimes they were successful, while other times they were not.
163:
merchant community perceived these policies as detrimental to their commercial interests, prompting them to take action against their implementation. They often resorted to
749:
Mills, L.A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867". Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 3 (2): 272 -242 – via JSTOR.
304:. Prior to the transfer, the EIC had adopted a non-intervention stance and neglected the cultivation of positive relationships with local rulers. Influenced by
758:
Mills, L.A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867". Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 3 (2): 272-275 – via JSTOR.
89:
961:
230:
497:
Abraham, Andrew (2002). "The Transfer Of The Straits Settlements: A Revisionist Approach To The Study Of Colonial Law And Administration".
439:
Abraham, Andrew (2002). "The Transfer Of The Straits Settlements: A Revisionist Approach To The Study Of Colonial Law And Administration".
66:
colony. The transfer would have lasting impacts, establishing the new administration of the Straits Settlements and paving the way for the
768:
Turnbull, Mary (1 January 1972). Straits Settlements, 1826-67: Indian Presidency to Crown Colony. London: Athlone Press. pp. 381–382.
656:
Mary, Turnbull (March 1970). "Internal Security in the Straits Settlements, 1826-1867". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 1 (1): 51.
867:
Abraham, Andrew. “The Transfer of the Straits Settlements: A Revisionist Approach to the Study of Colonial Law and Administration.”
417:
Turnbull, Mary (1 January 1972). Straits Settlements, 1826-67: Indian Presidency to Crown Colony. London: Athlone Press. pp. 58–59.
400:
Turnbull, Mary (1 January 1972). Straits Settlements, 1826-67: Indian Presidency to Crown Colony. London: Athlone Press. pp. 54–58.
349:
Turnbull, Mary (1 January 1972). Straits Settlements, 1826-67: Indian Presidency to Crown Colony. London: Athlone Press. pp. 58–59.
274:. A new administration was established which would largely remain the same till the Japanese occupation in 1942, featuring an
772:
612:
421:
404:
386:
121:
112:
229:
A significant factor contributing to the movement for transfer was the administration’s ineffective control over the
217:
The dissatisfaction of the merchant community with the EIC also stemmed from frustrations regarding an ineffective
101:
205:
170:
The most prominent instance was in 1854 when the EIC proposed a new copper currency based on fractions of the
100:. In 1851, the Straits Settlements were converted to a direct dependency and supervision was given to the
195:
Another of the EIC’s initiatives that fuelled merchant dissatisfaction was the use of the Settlements as
17:
184:
305:
279:
55:
84:
769:
608:
418:
401:
382:
275:
93:
811:
639:
254:
301:
51:
630:
Mary, Turnbull (March 1970). "Internal Security in the Straits Settlements, 1826-1867".
309:
294:
242:
ultimately rejected by the attendees, this idea of transfer started gaining traction.
175:
67:
54:
on 1 April 1867. This transfer was initiated with the passing of the Government of the
174:
as legal tender. However, Spanish and Mexican dollars that had been used for trade in
955:
180:
117:
271:
196:
171:
105:
59:
47:
149:, advocating for policy changes and ultimately seeking a shift in administration.
120:. The authority of the governor and his administration was further reduced by the
226:
Straits administration unable to effectively enforce laws or protect residents.
222:
881:
Chiang, Hai Ding. “The Origins of the Malaysian Currency System (1867—1906).”
815:
643:
524:
Chiang, Hai Ding (July 1966). "The Origins of the Malaysian Currency System".
104:. After the EIC was dissolved in 1858, control was finally handed over to the
930:
Turnbull, Mary. “Internal Security in the Straits Settlements, 1826 – 1867.”
286:
266:
218:
39:
331:
Mills, L. A.; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
111:
The government structure put in place during the Settlements’ demotion to
717:
Mills, L. A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
704:
Mills, L. A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
684:
Mills, L. A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
668:
Mills, L. A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
359:
Mills, L. A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
290:
164:
141:
731:
Mills, L.A; Blagden, C. O. (November 1925). "British Malaya 1824-1867".
577:
Turnbull, Mary (1970). "Convicts in the Straits Settlements 1826-1867".
559:
Turnbull, Mary (1970). "Convicts in the Straits Settlements 1826-1867".
545:
Turnbull, Mary (1970). "Convicts in the Straits Settlements 1826-1867".
221:
and the weak administration of laws. The laws in question were based on
904:
The British as Rulers : Governing Multiracial Singapore, 1867-1914
787:
The British as rulers : governing multiracial Singapore, 1867-1914
97:
43:
253:
In April 1858, the parliamentary debate on the petition began in the
146:
35:
802:
Legge, John (March 1998). "The Colonial Office and Governor Ord".
125:
92:
status, reestablishing it as a residency under the control of the
923:
Turnbull, Mary. “Convicts in the Straits Settlements 1826-1867.”
27:
Establishment of Penang, Singapore and Malacca as a Crown Colony
605:
Straits Settlements, 1826-67: Indian Presidency to Crown Colony
379:
Straits Settlements, 1826-67: Indian Presidency to Crown Colony
300:
The Transfer would have wide reaching effects for the whole of
124:. This act not only abolished the EIC's monopoly on trade with
265:
The handover of the Settlements was met with celebration and
925:
Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
883:
Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
869:
Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
579:
Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
561:
Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
547:
Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
499:
Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
441:
Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
916:
Mills, L.A., and C.O. Blagden. “British Malaya 1824-1867.”
918:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
876:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
733:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
719:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
706:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
686:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
670:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
361:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
333:
Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
789:. Singapore: Singapore University Press. pp. xv–xvi.
909:
Legge, John. “The Colonial Office and Governor Ord.”
58:
Act in 1866, thus assigning the Straits Settlements
890:
Malaysia : A Study in Direct and Indirect Rule
140:Since the establishment of Penang, the British
906:. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1991.
874:Blagden, C O. “British Malaya, 1824–1867. B.”
853:Malaysia. A Study in Direct and Indirect Rule
526:Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society
136:Merchant community in the Straits Settlements
34:was the official handover of the colonies of
8:
855:. The Macmillan Company. pp. 117–134.
607:. London: Athlone Press. pp. 86–101.
18:Draft:Transfer of the Straits Settlements
514:. 45 (4): 922 - 940 – via JSTOR.
488:. 45 (4): 923 - 924 – via JSTOR.
320:
688:. 3 (2): 348 – 349 – via JSTOR.
541:
539:
797:
795:
700:
698:
696:
694:
680:
678:
664:
662:
625:
623:
589:
587:
470:. 45 (4): 907–910 – via JSTOR.
79:Governance of the Straits Settlements
7:
721:. 3 (2): 351–352 – via JSTOR.
708:. 3 (2): 349-350 – via JSTOR.
672:. 3 (2): 335-336 – via JSTOR.
480:
478:
476:
462:
460:
458:
456:
454:
434:
432:
430:
381:. London: Athlone Pres. p. 56.
326:
324:
213:Judiciary and administration of laws
581:. 43 (1): 89–91 – via JSTOR.
549:. 43 (1): 95–97 – via JSTOR.
310:colonisation of the whole of Malaya
237:Transfer of the Straits Settlements
200:serving as source of cheap labour.
32:Transfer of the Straits Settlements
932:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
911:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
851:Emerson, Rupert (1 January 1937).
804:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
632:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
25:
603:Turnbull, Mary (1 January 1972).
377:Turnbull, Mary (1 January 1872).
939:The Straits Settlements, 1826-67
920:3, no. 2 (November 1925): 1–339.
878:3, no. 2 (November 1925): 1–339.
842:. London: Macmillan. p. 444
962:1867 in the Straits Settlements
948:45, no. 4 (July 2011): 899–929.
941:. London: Athlone Press, 1972.
897:Historians of South East Asia.
892:. The Macmillan Company, 1979.
68:British colonisation of Malaya
1:
934:1, no. 1 (March 1970): 37–53.
567:(1): 87–88 – via JSTOR.
501:. 42: 3–6 – via JSTOR.
367:(2): 82–83 – via JSTOR.
913:29, no. 1 (March 1998): 1–7.
739:(2): 272 – via JSTOR.
285:However, the new governor,
978:
840:History of South East Asia
339:(2): 82 – via JSTOR.
282:, both led by a governor.
116:low rank within the EIC's
85:British East India Company
927:43, no. 1 (1970): 87–103.
816:10.1017/S0022463400021445
644:10.1017/S0022463400000060
102:Governor General of India
899:London: Macmillan, 1955.
447:: 3–5 – via JSTOR.
306:Pitt’s India Act of 1784
231:Chinese secret societies
885:39, no. 1 (1966): 1–18.
158:Tax and monetary policy
52:British Colonial Office
185:Resident of Singapore
946:Modern Asian Studies
838:Hall, D.G.E (1955).
512:Modern Asian Studies
486:Modern Asian Studies
468:Modern Asian Studies
48:British India Office
785:Lee, Edwin (1991).
280:legislative council
122:Charter Act of 1833
96:, headquartered in
56:Straits Settlements
818:– via JSTOR.
153:Motivating factors
888:Emerson, Rupert.
276:executive council
94:Bengal Presidency
16:(Redirected from
969:
937:Turnbull, Mary.
871:42 (2002): 1–33.
856:
849:
843:
836:
830:
826:
820:
819:
799:
790:
783:
777:
765:
759:
756:
750:
747:
741:
740:
728:
722:
715:
709:
702:
689:
682:
673:
666:
657:
654:
648:
647:
627:
618:
601:
595:
591:
582:
575:
569:
568:
556:
550:
543:
534:
533:
521:
515:
508:
502:
495:
489:
482:
471:
464:
449:
448:
436:
425:
414:
408:
397:
391:
375:
369:
368:
356:
350:
347:
341:
340:
328:
255:House of Commons
21:
977:
976:
972:
971:
970:
968:
967:
966:
952:
951:
864:
859:
850:
846:
837:
833:
827:
823:
801:
800:
793:
784:
780:
766:
762:
757:
753:
748:
744:
730:
729:
725:
716:
712:
703:
692:
683:
676:
667:
660:
655:
651:
629:
628:
621:
615:
602:
598:
592:
585:
576:
572:
558:
557:
553:
544:
537:
523:
522:
518:
509:
505:
496:
492:
483:
474:
465:
452:
438:
437:
428:
415:
411:
398:
394:
389:
376:
372:
358:
357:
353:
348:
344:
330:
329:
322:
318:
263:
239:
215:
193:
191:Indian convicts
160:
155:
138:
81:
76:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
975:
973:
965:
964:
954:
953:
950:
949:
942:
935:
928:
921:
914:
907:
900:
893:
886:
879:
872:
863:
860:
858:
857:
844:
831:
821:
791:
778:
760:
751:
742:
723:
710:
690:
674:
658:
649:
619:
613:
596:
583:
570:
551:
535:
516:
503:
490:
472:
450:
426:
409:
392:
387:
370:
351:
342:
319:
317:
314:
262:
259:
238:
235:
214:
211:
197:penal colonies
192:
189:
176:Southeast Asia
159:
156:
154:
151:
137:
134:
80:
77:
75:
72:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
974:
963:
960:
959:
957:
947:
943:
940:
936:
933:
929:
926:
922:
919:
915:
912:
908:
905:
901:
898:
895:Hall, D.G.E.
894:
891:
887:
884:
880:
877:
873:
870:
866:
865:
861:
854:
848:
845:
841:
835:
832:
825:
822:
817:
813:
809:
805:
798:
796:
792:
788:
782:
779:
776:
774:
771:
764:
761:
755:
752:
746:
743:
738:
734:
727:
724:
720:
714:
711:
707:
701:
699:
697:
695:
691:
687:
681:
679:
675:
671:
665:
663:
659:
653:
650:
645:
641:
637:
633:
626:
624:
620:
616:
610:
606:
600:
597:
590:
588:
584:
580:
574:
571:
566:
562:
555:
552:
548:
542:
540:
536:
531:
527:
520:
517:
513:
507:
504:
500:
494:
491:
487:
481:
479:
477:
473:
469:
463:
461:
459:
457:
455:
451:
446:
442:
435:
433:
431:
427:
424:
423:
420:
413:
410:
407:
406:
403:
396:
393:
390:
384:
380:
374:
371:
366:
362:
355:
352:
346:
343:
338:
334:
327:
325:
321:
315:
313:
311:
307:
303:
298:
296:
292:
288:
287:Sir Harry Ord
283:
281:
277:
273:
268:
260:
258:
256:
251:
247:
243:
236:
234:
232:
227:
224:
220:
212:
210:
207:
206:Indian Mutiny
201:
198:
190:
188:
186:
182:
181:John Crawfurd
177:
173:
168:
166:
157:
152:
150:
148:
143:
135:
133:
129:
127:
123:
119:
118:civil service
114:
109:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
86:
83:In 1826, the
78:
73:
71:
69:
63:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
945:
938:
931:
924:
917:
910:
903:
902:Lee, Edwin.
896:
889:
882:
875:
868:
852:
847:
839:
834:
824:
807:
803:
786:
781:
767:
763:
754:
745:
736:
732:
726:
718:
713:
705:
685:
669:
652:
638:(1): 37–53.
635:
631:
604:
599:
578:
573:
564:
560:
554:
546:
529:
525:
519:
511:
506:
498:
493:
485:
467:
444:
440:
416:
412:
399:
395:
378:
373:
364:
360:
354:
345:
336:
332:
299:
284:
272:constitution
264:
252:
248:
244:
240:
228:
216:
202:
194:
172:Indian rupee
169:
161:
139:
130:
110:
106:India Office
82:
64:
60:crown colony
50:over to the
31:
29:
223:English law
183:, a former
862:References
810:(1): 1–7.
773:0485131323
614:0485131323
422:0485131323
405:0485131323
388:0485131323
293:, and the
90:presidency
74:Background
267:fireworks
261:Aftermath
219:judiciary
165:petitions
142:merchants
113:residency
46:from the
40:Singapore
956:Category
98:Calcutta
62:status.
532:(1): 3.
44:Malacca
829:JSTOR.
611:
594:JSTOR.
385:
302:Malaya
278:and a
147:London
42:, and
36:Penang
316:Notes
295:Dutch
126:China
770:ISBN
609:ISBN
419:ISBN
402:ISBN
383:ISBN
291:Siam
30:The
812:doi
640:doi
108:.
958::
808:29
806:.
794:^
735:.
693:^
677:^
661:^
634:.
622:^
586:^
565:43
563:.
538:^
530:39
528:.
475:^
453:^
445:42
443:.
429:^
363:.
335:.
323:^
312:.
297:.
70:.
38:,
814::
775:.
737:3
646:.
642::
636:1
617:.
365:3
337:3
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.