270:. This can occur under conditions of pressures of limited time, money, exhaustion and exhortations to settle from lawyers. Another person is generally authorised to give consent if an individual is unable to. These cases sometimes result in a party refusing to comply with the terms of the contract; however, they are rarely successful as a defense to an enforcement action. Judges usually take the view that a client advised by a lawyer is strongly presumed both to have a basic understanding of legal principle, and to have given consent (Informed Consent 2007). This was the case in
63:
229:
aesthetic, and political) are relative to the individual within a culture. Types of relativism include moral (where ethics depend on the social assembly), situational (where right or wrong is dependent on the situation), and cognitive (where truth itself has no objective standard). The legislative system is having a harder time defining laws with the diminishing set of standards, and our court system is having a harder time interpreting them (Cultural
Relativism – Illogical Standard 2006).
188:, a negotiator is not only doing so to reach an agreement between two or more parties, but to create an agreement that is durable; whereby parties of the contract are legally bound and committed to its promises (Wade and Honeyman 2005, 7). A legally binding contract is defined as an exchange of promises or an agreement between parties that the law will enforce, and there is an underlying presumption for commercial agreements that parties
125:
250:
party to hold a
Japanese party to the contract when it is known that the Japanese party would not have intended to be legally bound? Or is it unethical or immoral of the Japanese to sign such an agreement, even though they mean well when signing it, knowing the Western party intended to be legally bound by the contract but themselves see the contract as more of a flexible agreement?
22:
274:(1990) FLC 92–137, where a husband settled for 10% of assets against his probable entitlement to 40%, and it was held that there was no miscarriage of justice as the husband acted freely and was advised to seek legal advice. In cases where an individual is provided limited facts, serious ethical issues may arise.
245:
In some cultural groups such as Japan, the creation of a contract symbolises the formation of a working relationship, and not a legally binding agreement. Some groups will regard the contract as being flexible in terms that if any problems or issues arise, the parties will reassess the obligations of
209:
Wade and
Honeyman (2007, 7) describe a ‘durable’ contract as one in which all parties substantially perform without abandonment and without resorting to legal proceedings. With only anecdotal evidence, it is difficult to know what percentages of contracts are in fact breached. It is probable that the
286:
If the chance of success and money is opportune to a wealthy person, their capacity and willingness can give rise to alleging various legal justifications for breach. A few years of legal expenses may only be a small proportion of their empire, and the resulting attrition and disparate investment in
249:
In relation to the ethical issue of cultural relativism, a business is obliged to operate in a manner acceptable to the host country, both legally and morally (Grace and Cohen 2005, 19). But what if the contract is not necessarily subject to having a ‘host country’? Is it morally wrong for a
Western
302:
is an equitable doctrine that involves one person taking advantage of a position of power over another. The law presumes that in certain classes of relationship there will be a special risk of one party unduly influencing their conduct and motives for contracting (Undue
Influence 2007). Because the
236:
Following are reasons for breaches in contracts and the way in which these ethical considerations may impact upon them. In most of these situations, the law may not agree with moral or cultural relativism and award in favour of what people generally view as being ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. It is therefore
310:
CA Ct of App 54 Ca Rpt 533 . The plaintiff was under contract as a teacher. He was arrested, and the next day he allegedly was pressured by his superiors to sign and deliver his resignation. He was cleared of the criminal charges, and then he sought to be reinstated by the school district. They
290:
In terms of moral relativism, most people would agree that it is ethically wrong to use wealth to control a situation and to ‘force’ people into renegotiating clauses in contracts if they are unable to afford the legal bill accompanying a dispute. However, as moral relativism is subject to a one's
237:
imperative that contracts are created to be as durable as possible so parties are unable to find legal ‘loopholes’ and use their power, wealth, ignorance or cultural differences in setting contracts aside. Following these descriptions is a list of ways on which contracts can be made more durable.
314:
When a party has placed their confidence and trust in another and this relationship is broken, the view of moral relativism will generally see this situation as being wrong. Undue influence is usually an act of dishonesty and/or deceit in a situation where one party realizes their power over the
233:
acknowledged as the chief moral philosophy of modern society (Moral
Relativism – Neutral Thinking?. 2006). However, these "Judeo-Christian" standards continue to be the foundation for civil law, as most people believe that right and wrong are not absolutes, but are determined by the individual.
277:
Is it ethical to hold someone to a contract when they clearly had no awareness of exactly what they were signing and committing themselves to, due to ignorance or not? Is it ethical for a lawyer to encourage the signing of a document if they are clearly not fully understanding of the document?
228:
Grace and Cohen (2005, 200) describe cultural relativism as the extent to which different societies and cultures have different values and ethical standards in the fields of business and organisational life. Those who embrace cultural relativism believe that all beliefs (religious, ethical,
232:
Moral relativism views ethical standards, morality, and positions of right or wrong as being culturally based. This therefore subjects these views as being an individual's choice. While modern society was previously governed by a "Judeo-Christian" standard, this view has increasingly been
257:
This then highlights the issue of different legal rules existing in different countries which enable contracts to be set aside. The list of exceptions to finality of contracts varies from one jurisdiction to another, and this is often placed under the label ‘frustration of contracts’.
253:
Honeyman and Wade (2007) state that differences in cultural expectations can predictably lead to the more economically powerful party attempting to negotiate that all breaches will be dealt with ultimately by courts from their own culture, applying their own cultural and legal rules.
291:
own beliefs on what is right and wrong, some may not view using wealth as a means to control as being the wrong thing to do. In situations such as these, the ‘little man’ usually loses out and will ultimately succumb to the power of the other party or parties.
379:
Publicize the deal by mutual agreement. A wider audience will then place expectations on all parties to perform, or risk losing face and credibility in future arrangements. Most people have a strong desire to act consistently with their own clear
303:
court can vitiate such a contract if there is a special relationship, when no special relationship exists, the general rule is whether there was a relationship of such trust and confidence that it should give rise to such a presumption.
333:
Clarifying whether ‘yes’ means ‘maybe’ or ‘no’ and whether signed and detailed contracts are considered to be binding, morally, legally and/or in reputation, or just amount to the declaration that a working relationship now
311:
refused, so he sued to rescind his resignation. He claimed that his resignation should not be enforced because, among other things, he signed it under the "undue influence" of his superiors.
450:
Honeyman, C. and Prof. J. H. Wade. 2005. Negotiating Beyond
Agreement and Commitment: Why contracts are breached and how to make them more durable (20): 7–17. Bond University.
399:
35:
323:
As
Honeyman and Wade (2005, 15) point out, to increase the chances of ‘performance’ of a contract (and therefore reduce chances of a breach), a party should enhance:
246:
the agreement and negotiate ways to preserve the relationship (Honeyman and Wade 2007, 8). However, this is not generally the ‘Western’ view on contracts.
330:
Avoiding making contracts with cultural groups that view contracts as the ‘beginning of a relationship’, rather than a legally binding agreement
146:
41:
202:
Something of value must be exchanged for something else of value. This can include goods, cash, services, or a pledge to exchange these items.
327:
Entering into contracts with parties where there is already a longstanding relationship – therefore raising incentives to perform promises
84:
206:
In addition, certain contracts are required by state law to be in writing (real estate transactions, for example), while others are not.
210:
statistics vary greatly over differing class, culture, wealth and type of transaction (Wade and
Honeyman 2005, 7). The reasons for a
171:
106:
49:
407:
340:
Attempting to agree that final determination of any future problems with performance will be in a court or arbitration venue
353:
Attempting to enter into an agreement which recognizes procedural, emotional and substantive needs of all parties involved
137:
287:
the conflict may eventually encourage other parties to renegotiate the disputed clauses (Honeyman and Wade 2005, 15).
315:
other and takes advantage of this. Deception and deceit are not viewed as being ethical values inherent in a person.
77:
71:
88:
488:
438:
337:
Including clauses and a discussion regarding how any future misunderstandings and problems will be addressed
483:
421:
364:, vague terminology or illegality and this will give other parties the opportunity to claim a loophole
218:
211:
447:
Grace, D., and S. Cohen. 2005. Business Ethics. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford
University Press.
267:
222:
426:
347:
299:
430:
217:
Some ethical considerations which may become apparent in the durability of contracts are
124:
477:
195:
In order to be a legally binding contract, most contracts must contain two elements:
199:
All parties must agree about an offer made by one party and accepted by the other.
185:
458:
361:
357:
214:
are also varying, and ethical issues can emerge in some situations.
465:
400:"Contract Law – How to Create a Legally Binding Contract | SBA.gov"
343:
Only going into contract with parties that are stable and reliable
356:
Not walking close to the line on any of the legal rules such as
118:
56:
15:
451:
370:
Making congratulatory speeches about the agreement's benefits
266:
Some acts cannot legally take place because of a lack of
142:
350:
insurance for non-performance or currency fluctuations
457:Cultural Relativism – Illogical Standard. 2006.
432:
454:(accessed October 15, 2007). Contracts. 2007.
8:
464:Moral Relativism – Neutral Thinking?. 2006.
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
172:Learn how and when to remove this message
107:Learn how and when to remove this message
367:Attempting to reduce buyer's remorse by
70:This article includes a list of general
391:
376:Adding post-agreement gifts and bonuses
319:Increasing the Durability of Contracts
308:Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School District
192:to be legally bound (Contracts 2007).
373:Never agreeing quickly to any clauses
7:
241:Cultural Expectations of Flexibility
459:http://www.cultural-relativism.com/
76:it lacks sufficient corresponding
14:
136:to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s
31:This article has multiple issues.
466:http://www.moral-relativism.com/
123:
61:
20:
39:or discuss these issues on the
1:
306:An example of such a case is
471:(accessed October 15, 2007)
468:(accessed October 15, 2007)
461:(accessed October 15, 2007)
505:
452:http://www.bond.edu.au/law
262:Lack of Informed Consent
149:may contain suggestions.
134:may need to be rewritten
437: (17 August 1936),
91:more precise citations.
427:[1936] HCA 41
272:Gerbert and Gerbert
219:cultural relativism
422:Johnson v Buttress
212:breach of contract
182:
181:
174:
164:
163:
138:quality standards
117:
116:
109:
54:
496:
442:
434:
418:
412:
411:
406:. Archived from
396:
268:informed consent
223:moral relativism
184:When creating a
177:
170:
159:
156:
150:
127:
119:
112:
105:
101:
98:
92:
87:this article by
78:inline citations
65:
64:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
495:
494:
493:
489:Business ethics
474:
473:
445:
419:
415:
398:
397:
393:
389:
348:risk management
321:
300:Undue influence
297:
295:Undue Influence
284:
264:
243:
178:
167:
166:
165:
160:
154:
151:
141:
128:
113:
102:
96:
93:
83:Please help to
82:
66:
62:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
502:
500:
492:
491:
486:
476:
475:
444:
443:
413:
410:on 2013-01-05.
390:
388:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
374:
371:
365:
354:
351:
344:
341:
338:
335:
331:
328:
320:
317:
296:
293:
283:
280:
263:
260:
242:
239:
204:
203:
200:
180:
179:
162:
161:
131:
129:
122:
115:
114:
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
501:
490:
487:
485:
482:
481:
479:
472:
469:
467:
462:
460:
455:
453:
448:
440:
436:
428:
424:
423:
417:
414:
409:
405:
401:
395:
392:
386:
378:
375:
372:
369:
368:
366:
363:
359:
355:
352:
349:
345:
342:
339:
336:
332:
329:
326:
325:
324:
318:
316:
312:
309:
304:
301:
294:
292:
288:
281:
279:
275:
273:
269:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
224:
220:
215:
213:
207:
201:
198:
197:
196:
193:
191:
187:
176:
173:
158:
148:
144:
139:
135:
132:This article
130:
126:
121:
120:
111:
108:
100:
90:
86:
80:
79:
73:
68:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
484:Contract law
470:
463:
456:
449:
446:
441:(Australia).
420:
416:
408:the original
403:
394:
322:
313:
307:
305:
298:
289:
285:
276:
271:
265:
256:
252:
248:
244:
235:
231:
227:
216:
208:
205:
194:
189:
183:
168:
152:
143:You can help
133:
103:
97:October 2007
94:
75:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
404:www.sba.gov
346:Taking out
89:introducing
478:Categories
439:High Court
431:(1936) 56
387:References
380:commitment
72:references
36:improve it
147:talk page
42:talk page
186:contract
155:May 2018
85:improve
362:deceit
358:duress
334:exists
282:Wealth
190:intend
145:. The
74:, but
425:
221:and
435:113
433:CLR
480::
429:,
402:.
360:,
225:.
45:.
175:)
169:(
157:)
153:(
140:.
110:)
104:(
99:)
95:(
81:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
