Knowledge (XXG)

Eo nomine

Source đź“ť

25: 121:
classification is usually a well-known name or term and includes all items in that class of articles, regardless of form, unless the language of a particular provision limits the scope so as to exclude certain items. For example, it was determined that, as an
334: 126:
designation, “radio receivers” as a class is not limited to entertainment broadcast receivers, but instead includes all forms of radio receivers. Parts are not generally included in an
161: 43: 310: 303: 165: 339: 61: 329: 296: 101:
Justice Souter, for the dissent, wrote that according to natural law a sovereign, like a state, could not be sued in its own
130:
classification unless the relevant HTSUS provision specifies that parts are included. Use does not generally factor into an
218:"Hasbro Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee, 879 F.2d 838 (Fed. Cir. 1989)" 92: 217: 232:"SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, PERSONAL JURISDICTION, VENUE & FORUM NON CONVENIENS STATE BAR OF TEXAS" 144:
is often called "interest as interest" and cannot be pleaded for as damages in a plaintiff's claim.
186: 203: 280: 231: 248: 137:
Use of eo nomine is used extensively by the United States Court of International Trade.
97: 323: 113:
International Trade and the Harmonized Tariff Schedule Classification
162:"Import & Export Compliance: Classification is an Art - Part 2" 276: 102: 80: 105:
based on a right it created, "A state would be subject to a suit
272: 18: 134:
classification though it may be used to establish identity."
284: 39: 34:
may be too technical for most readers to understand
335:United States federal sovereign immunity case law 95:uses it in the context of sovereign immunity. In 304: 8: 187:"AIRFLOW TECHNOLOGY, INC. vs UNITED STATES" 311: 297: 204:"CLARENDON MARKETING INC v. UNITED STATES" 62:Learn how and when to remove this message 46:, without removing the technical details. 153: 109:in its own courts on a federal claim." 44:make it understandable to non-experts 7: 261: 259: 249:Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999) 83:legal term meaning "by that name". 283:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 23: 1: 164:. 2012-08-28. Archived from 93:United States Supreme Court 356: 258: 340:Latin legal phrase stubs 330:Latin legal terminology 292: 291: 87:State Sovereignty 72: 71: 64: 347: 313: 306: 299: 275:article about a 267: 260: 236: 235: 228: 222: 221: 214: 208: 207: 200: 194: 193: 191: 183: 177: 176: 174: 173: 158: 67: 60: 56: 53: 47: 27: 26: 19: 355: 354: 350: 349: 348: 346: 345: 344: 320: 319: 318: 317: 263: 256: 245: 240: 239: 230: 229: 225: 216: 215: 211: 202: 201: 197: 189: 185: 184: 180: 171: 169: 160: 159: 155: 150: 115: 89: 68: 57: 51: 48: 40:help improve it 37: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 353: 351: 343: 342: 337: 332: 322: 321: 316: 315: 308: 301: 293: 290: 289: 268: 252: 251: 244: 243:External links 241: 238: 237: 223: 209: 195: 178: 152: 151: 149: 146: 114: 111: 98:Alden v. Maine 88: 85: 70: 69: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 352: 341: 338: 336: 333: 331: 328: 327: 325: 314: 309: 307: 302: 300: 295: 294: 288: 286: 282: 278: 274: 269: 266: 262: 257: 254: 250: 247: 246: 242: 233: 227: 224: 219: 213: 210: 205: 199: 196: 188: 182: 179: 168:on 2016-08-17 167: 163: 157: 154: 147: 145: 143: 138: 135: 133: 129: 125: 120: 112: 110: 108: 104: 100: 99: 94: 86: 84: 82: 78: 77: 66: 63: 55: 52:November 2021 45: 41: 35: 32:This article 30: 21: 20: 285:expanding it 279:phrase is a 270: 264: 255: 253: 226: 212: 198: 181: 170:. Retrieved 166:the original 156: 141: 139: 136: 131: 127: 123: 118: 116: 106: 96: 90: 75: 74: 73: 58: 49: 33: 324:Categories 172:2016-07-12 148:References 16:Legal term 142:eo nomine 140:Interest 132:eo nomine 128:eo nomine 124:eo nomine 119:eo nomine 107:eo nomine 76:Eo nomine 38:Please 277:Latin 273:legal 271:This 190:(PDF) 103:court 81:Latin 79:is a 281:stub 117:"An 91:The 265:IUS 42:to 326:: 312:e 305:t 298:v 287:. 234:. 220:. 206:. 192:. 175:. 65:) 59:( 54:) 50:( 36:.

Index

help improve it
make it understandable to non-experts
Learn how and when to remove this message
Latin
United States Supreme Court
Alden v. Maine
court
"Import & Export Compliance: Classification is an Art - Part 2"
the original
"AIRFLOW TECHNOLOGY, INC. vs UNITED STATES"
"CLARENDON MARKETING INC v. UNITED STATES"
"Hasbro Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States, Defendant-appellee, 879 F.2d 838 (Fed. Cir. 1989)"
"SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, PERSONAL JURISDICTION, VENUE & FORUM NON CONVENIENS STATE BAR OF TEXAS"
Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)
legal
Latin
stub
expanding it
v
t
e
Categories
Latin legal terminology
United States federal sovereign immunity case law
Latin legal phrase stubs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑