571:—issued an order regarding the stay motion. In a 2–1 decision, it partially stayed Judge Kacsmaryk's order by allowing the FDA's original 2000 approval of mifepristone to stand, ruling that too much time had passed to challenge the ruling. However, the order did not stay Kacsmaryk's order insofar as it struck down hold changes to the REMS for mifepristone issued by the FDA in 2016 that had made the drug easier to obtain, including through the mail, and extended the allowed use of the drug from seven to ten weeks of pregnancy. The opinion stated that "it would be difficult for to argue that" the 2016 changes to the REMS "were so critical to the public given that the Nation operated—and mifepristone was administered to millions of women—without them for sixteen years following the" original approval, and thus that that was no reason to put them on hold. Judge Haynes noted that she would grant an administrative stay of Kacsmaryk's order in full.
36:
788:
who suffered complications from using mifepristone were also rejected, as
Kavanaugh wrote "Federal law fully protects doctors against being required to provide abortions or other medical treatment against their consciences — and therefore breaks any chain of causation between FDA’s relaxed regulation of mifepristone and any asserted conscience injuries to the doctors." He also stated that doctors "have never had standing to challenge FDA drug approvals simply on the theory that use of the drug by
300:, the Fifth Circuit partially reverted Kacsmaryk's injunction, allowing the drug's 2000 approval to stand, but putting on hold changes to the FDA's distribution rules on the drug that were put in place in 2016, including distribution by mail. A separate Washington federal district judge also issued on April 7, 2023, a separate injunction forcing the FDA to maintain the distribution of mifepristone in 16 states and the District of Columbia. On April 13, that judge issued
801:. Association standing allows for an association representing members of a class with standing to bring the case to court. Thomas stated that this concept may be unconstitutional that should be reviewed in a more appropriate case. He wrote, "If a single member of an association has suffered an injury, our doctrine permits that association to seek relief for its entire membership - even if the association has tens of millions of other, non-injured members."
772:
Oral arguments were held on March 26, 2024. Court observers found the a majority of the justices appeared to support the FDA's assertion that the
Alliance lacked standing to challenge the law, a view taken by the three more-liberal justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson, joined by Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justices Alito and Thomas were seen to support that there was standing and asked questions related to the rationale for overriding the FDA.
507:
represented some doctors to whom the injured women and girls might turn; that this would harm the doctors who had to care for those patients; and that that harm to the doctors was "sufficiently imminent" and there was a "'substantial risk' that the harm will occur". As the organizations were doctors' groups, he also ruled that they had
680:. Kacsmaryk is a "devout Christian" and reliably conservative judge, who has struck down several Biden administration policies on issues of immigration, LGBT rights, and abortion. AHM filed the case in Amarillo, Texas, which belongs to the Amarillo Division, where Kacsmaryk is the only judge, leading to accusations of "
787:
Justice Brett
Kavanaugh wrote the opinion, stating that while the Alliance may have moral and policy concerns on mifepristone, because they did not prescribe mifepristone, they failed to demonstrate a legally cognizable injury to challenge its use. The Alliance's claims that it might treat patients
771:
Both the FDA and Danco petitioned to the
Supreme Court to challenge the Fifth Circuit's ruling. The court certified both petitions, consolidated under the FDA's challenge, and limited the case to the question of standing, and of the appropriateness of the FDA rule changes in 2016, 2021, and, 2023.
762:
of mifepristone, stated that, should the FDA be forced to remove mifepristone from the market, it would need to go through certain procedural requirements to reverse their prior approval of the drug, or otherwise GenBioPro's product would be mislabeled on the market. Legal experts were unclear how
721:
Kacsmaryk had written that women who went through abortions "often experience shame, regret, anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and suicidal thoughts because of the abortion", but did not cite any studies reporting the opposite. One study highlighting mental issues stemming from abortion, as well as
362:
In March 2016, the FDA loosened safety precautions present in the original approval, allowing medical practitioners to also prescribe the drug, and increased the time into the pregnancy term when the drug could be used. In April 2021, in response to the lack of access to medical care caused by the
506:
to sue—the legal right to bring a case before a judge. He held that because mifepristone can cause serious complications to pregnant women and girls, they might need to go to a doctor for treatment; that abortion providers generally do not treat such cases; that the associations bringing the case
734:
In his ruling, Kacsmaryk cited a
Finnish study that the "overall incidence of adverse events is 'fourfold higher' in chemical abortions when compared to surgical abortions", but one of the study's authors, gynecology professor Oskari Heikinheimo, disagreed with how Kacsmaryk portrayed the study;
730:
for having incomplete data. The
American Psychological Association instead reported: "Large longitudinal and international studies have found that obtaining a wanted abortion does not increase risk for depression, anxiety, or suicidal thoughts." Kacsmaryk did not discuss potential psychological
699:
scientific ways." In describing the action of the pill, he said that mifepristone is used to "to kill the unborn human" and that it "ultimately starves the unborn human until death." Kacsmaryk also referred to doctors who provide abortion pills as "abortionists," and called medication abortion
751:
of the
Eastern District of Washington, ruled in a separate lawsuit that the FDA should refrain from any actions to reduce the availability of the drug in 16 states and the District of Columbia. The Washington lawsuit had been raised due to changes in the REMS for mifepristone in January 2023,
399:
The lead plaintiff, the
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), describes itself as "uphold and promot the fundamental principles of Hippocratic medicine", which "include protecting the vulnerable at the beginning and end of life." AHM was incorporated in August 2022 and is headquartered in
519:—which would normally have started in 2016, when one of the plaintiff's review petitions was rejected—was "reopened" in 2016 and again in 2021, when the FDA increased access to the drug. He finally ruled that the approval of mifepristone was "otherwise not in accordance with law"—citing the
629:, ruled on August 16, 2023, to maintain the ban on mifepristone's availability that had come about from the 2016 FDA rule changes, ruling the FDA did not properly consider health factors in that decision. The ban remained on hold with the federal government appealing the decision to the
367:, the FDA allowed mifepristone to be obtained by mail from certified medical businesses and practitioners, which greatly increased access to the drug. Another REMS change was made in January 2023, allowing pharmacies approved by mifepristone manufacturers to also distribute the drug.
817:, which establishes procedures for the federal courts, established a new rule that challenges to state or federal laws with national impacts filed within federal districts would be randomly assigned to a judge within the entire district, aiming to prevent aggressive judge shopping.
495:. Ahead of an in-person hearing on the case, Kacsmaryk delayed entering the hearing on the court docket, citing concerns about potential protests over the hearing. After this information was leaked, the date was posted and the hearing took place as scheduled, on March 15, 2023.
359:(REMS) to identify the benefits and risks of any approved drug and give the FDA more control over adjusting their approvals of drugs. By the time the FDA completed the REMS for mifepristone in 2011, it kept the same limits on access at hospitals and other medical facilities.
538:
that claimed there was potential harm to the woman when taking milepristone. Sage retracted these two papers in
February 2024 over two issues. First, they stated that their primary author, James Studnicki of the Charlotte Lozier Institute, itself the research branch of the
608:
or significant record), stating: "I did not agree with these criticisms at the time, but if they were warranted in the cases in which they were made, they are emphatically true here" in this lawsuit. Alito added that his dissent did not analyze the merits of the lawsuit.
600:, in which he argued that, even if the Supreme Court restricted access to mifepristone, the FDA could refuse to enforce that decision and continue allowing access to mifepristone while the lawsuit continued. Alito also referred to previous lawsuits' criticisms of the '
346:
Under the 2000 approval, mifepristone was approved by the FDA under
Congressional regulations granted to them by Subpart H of the FDA's mandate. This included restricted distribution of mifepristone through hospitals and other medical facilities. With passage of the
301:
718:, and also "cites research based on anonymous blog posts, cherry picks statistics that exaggerate the negative physical and psychological effects of mifepristone, and ignores hundreds of scientific studies attesting to the medication's safety."
543:
organization, did not properly cite his potential conflict of interest in performing the studies. Second, Sage found from a second independent review of the works that there were "fundamental problems" with the studies' approach.
412:—in addition to four doctors. The plaintiffs argued that the FDA did not properly consider all evidence at the time of the 2000 approval of mifepristone, and sought relief by having the court revoke the FDA's approval.
752:
restricting the previously open access of the drug. The states argued that not only was the January 2023 REMS change too restrictive, but other parts of the current REMS were unnecessary and should be lifted.
583:
enacted a temporary administrative stay on the District Court's decision while the Supreme Court considered the case. Alito originally set the stay to last until April 19, then later extended it to April 21.
2789:
587:
On April 21, 2023, a majority of the Supreme Court, without comment, voted to stay the lower court decisions that would restrict access to mifepristone, pending the decision of the Fifth Circuit on the
488:
386:
and held that there was no constitutional right to abortion, which enabled states to ban abortion. In order to restrict abortions, several states also passed laws to prevent the sale of mifepristone.
669:(D–WA), cautioned that the government should allow the appeals process to proceed before taking any action to avoid risking the judicial process. Some Republicans praised the decision, like Senator
755:
Following the Fifth Circuit's April 12 ruling, Judge Rice declared in a new order that the Fifth Circuit's stay decision does not override his order for D.C. and the 16 state-parties in his case.
319:
to bring a case, since neither AHM nor the groups it represented had shown injury. The decision reversed the lower court decisions, restoring mifepristone's availability under current FDA rules.
273:
procedures. The plaintiffs, led by the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), argued that the FDA did not properly approve the use of the drug mifepristone for pregnancy termination under
1063:
897:
case are Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, D.C., Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania.
795:
Thomas wrote a concurring option that agreed that the Alliance did not have standing, but also challenged the concept of association standing that was argued, based on the 1977 case
797:
726:, an anti-abortion website run by the Institute of Reproductive Grief Care. Another study that was cited by Kacsmaryk regarding suicide after abortion had been criticized by the
91:
553:
460:
348:
2071:
579:
Both the Justice Department and Danco Laboratories appealed the restrictions on mifepristone to the Supreme Court on April 14, 2023. Later that day, Supreme Court Justice
2111:
527:—and ordered the FDA to suspend the drug's approval until a later date. He then stayed his own order for seven days to allow the government time to appeal his decision.
2233:
1784:
919:
758:
A separate lawsuit was filed by GenBioPro against the FDA shortly after the FDA had sought a stay on the Fifth Circuit's decision. GenBioPro, the manufacturers of the
2794:
376:
316:
279:
2819:
2804:
2337:
735:
Heikinheimo stated that the same study showed that serious complications were remarkably low for both types of abortions, while most of the "adverse events" were
1610:
2601:
2575:
1023:
1157:
512:
289:
and asserted there was no constitutional right to abortion at the federal level, leading conservative states and groups to further restrict abortion access.
277:
regulations and asked for an injunction to withdraw the drug's approval, thus removing it from the market. AHM's suit followed the Supreme Court's ruling in
1843:
781:
327:
Medication abortion, in which prescription medications are used to induce abortion of the embryo, typically occurs with a mixture of two different drugs—
2389:
1652:
1431:
1136:
1082:
1582:
1561:
1408:
1986:
813:, filed within a specific division of the district as to have the case likely assigned to a specific judge from that division. On March 12, 2024, the
409:
404:. Other plaintiffs include three out-of-state anti-abortion groups—the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), the
356:
1196:
Kortsmith, Katherine; Nguyen, Antoinette T.; Mandel, Michele G.; Clark, Elizabeth; Hollier, Lisa M.; Rodenhizer, Jessica; Whiteman, Maura K. (2022).
1044:
2799:
2504:
1515:
1387:
814:
617:
The case was put on an accelerated schedule, with the Fifth Circuit holding oral arguments on May 17. The Fifth Circuit panel, consisting of judges
2142:
2814:
2809:
1957:
456:
448:
2476:
708:
wrote that Kacsmaryk's ruling "strays from offering accurate health information from some of the largest medical organizations in the nation".
2273:
1817:
1366:
1326:
2784:
2676:
2562:
2092:
1202:
2207:
352:
274:
2309:
2009:
1452:
661:(D–NY), called for the Biden administration to ignore the ruling and continue to distribute mifepristone, while others, such as Senators
2663:
Grossi, Peter, O'Connor, D. (2023) "FDA preemption of conflicting state drug regulation and the looming battle over abortion medications
1727:
1633:
727:
308:
40:
941:
861:
540:
405:
2450:
2243:
784:
standing to challenge the FDA's approval or rule making. The decision reversed the Fifth Circuit ruling and lifted the injunction.
2370:
1473:
1349:
1877:
498:
On April 7, 2023, Kacsmaryk issued his opinion finding primarily in favor of the plaintiffs, and issued an order granting AHM's
971:
2121:
1256:
846:
2347:
1181:
1108:
436:
340:
296:
issued a preliminary injunction suspending the approval of mifepristone on April 7, 2023; on appeal by the government to the
928:
1905:
1701:
1931:
646:
2052:
1675:
1536:
1494:
336:
262:
59:
2030:
2530:
1851:
630:
371:
1618:
1388:"The FDA's power to approve drugs faces sweeping challenge in lawsuit seeking to pull abortion pill from U.S. market"
876:
Intervenor Danco Laboratories and the federal defendants filed separate appeals to the Supreme Court. The cases are
714:
described Kacsmaryk's ruling as repeatedly citing data collected from researchers affiliated with the anti-abortion
715:
641:
The Texas lower court decision has been widely criticized by Democratic politicians, such as House minority leader
416:
2412:
1277:
552:
On April 10, 2023, the Department of Justice and Danco Laboratories filed an emergency motion for a stay with the
592:
of the lawsuit, and a potential appeal of that decision. How every justice voted was not detailed, but Justices
1282:
658:
2431:
2208:"Judge's abortion pill decision embraces extreme language and ideology of anti-abortion movement, experts say"
722:
women receiving "insufficient information" on abortion, had its data collected from anonymous blog posts from
2397:
1660:
1090:
2768:
2764:
2760:
1416:
688:
1994:
122:
2563:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-courts-thomas-questions-ability-groups-challenge-us-laws-2024-06-13/
2543:
516:
499:
75:
71:
2283:
596:
and Alito publicly dissented, wanting to approve the restrictions. Alito was the only justice to write a
155:
Plaintiffs lack Article III standing to challenge FDA’s actions regarding the regulation of mifepristone.
2176:
1541:
622:
222:
86:
1367:"In Texas lawsuit seeking to reverse FDA approval of abortion pills, state attorneys general weigh in"
1882:
1587:
508:
492:
293:
2451:"Generic abortion pill maker GenBioPro sues FDA over its response to orders halting drug's approval"
2630:
2278:
2238:
1753:
1336:
710:
424:
2701:
2643:
1785:"Supreme Court says abortion pill mifepristone will remain broadly available during legal battle"
1457:
1004:
923:
687:
Media outlets noted that Kacsmaryk's opinion contained several instances of language employed by
597:
564:
471:
467:
452:
304:, purporting to force FDA to maintain approval regardless of the Texas or Fifth Circuit ruling.
1932:"Appeals court imposes restrictions on abortion pill, but drug will stay on the market for now"
2744:
2693:
2656:
2652:
1545:
1237:
1219:
1109:"The Supreme Court will decide the future of the abortion pill. A timeline of how we got here"
996:
988:
364:
214:
2093:"Meet the federal judge set to rule in a case that could disrupt access to the abortion pill"
2734:
2726:
2685:
2342:
1566:
1520:
1227:
1211:
980:
736:
676:
Attention was drawn to Judge Kacsmaryk, who was nominated to the bench in 2017 by President
670:
560:
530:
Kacsmaryk's opinion relied heavily on two scientific studies that had been published in the
270:
1516:"The Lawless Ruling Against the Abortion Pill Has Already Prompted a Constitutional Crisis"
1176:
2633:
76 (forthcoming 2024), University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-12,
2181:
780:
The court issued its unanimous decision on June 13, 2024, ruling that the Alliance lacked
704:
695:", stating: "Jurists often use the word 'fetus' to inaccurately identify unborn humans in
642:
593:
531:
401:
210:
190:
178:
1702:"Supreme Court asked to block ruling that threatens access to abortion pill mifepristone"
833:
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine was consolidated with the simultaneous petition
809:
The original case, filed on the Northern District of Texas, was considered an example of
502:, suspending the FDA's approval of the drug. He first concluded that the plaintiffs have
2072:"How an obscure Christian right activist became one of the most powerful men in America"
691:. He deliberately chose to use the terms "unborn human" and "unborn child" in place of "
2739:
2714:
2477:"Supreme Court seems likely to preserve access to the abortion medication mifepristone"
1754:"Supreme Court extends order preserving access to abortion pill mifepristone to Friday"
1232:
810:
748:
681:
650:
626:
503:
463:
444:
312:
137:
Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge FDA's 2016 and 2021 actions.
1197:
2778:
2705:
2076:
1331:
1257:"A federal judge could soon block access to an abortion pill. Here's what that means"
1141:
1008:
662:
605:
601:
568:
524:
440:
297:
2432:"Federal court rules 17 states, D.C. are not impacted by Texas abortion pill ruling"
1474:"What to know about the lawsuit aiming to ban medication abortion drug mifepristone"
261:, 602 U.S. 367 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case to challenge the U.S.
2531:
https://www.courthousenews.com/supreme-court-throws-out-challenge-to-abortion-pill/
2272:
Weber, Lauren; McGinley, Laurie; Ovalle, David; Sellers, Frances (April 13, 2023).
2116:
1499:
1158:"How the judge who could ban the abortion pill won confirmation in the U.S. Senate"
759:
677:
666:
580:
520:
328:
266:
202:
186:
170:
1878:"Supreme Court pauses abortion pill restrictions from taking effect during appeal"
1653:"Court Says Abortion Pill Can Remain Available but Imposes Temporary Restrictions"
684:", where plaintiffs select legal venues most likely to deliver favorable rulings.
2576:"Federal courts make it harder to 'judge-shop' as was done in abortion pill case"
1676:"Appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules"
1728:"Supreme Court Justice Alito issues administrative stay of abortion pill ruling"
1409:"12 States Sue F.D.A., Seeking Removal of Special Restrictions on Abortion Pill"
618:
589:
382:
332:
285:
198:
2629:
Cohen, David S., Donley, Greer, and Rebouché, Rachel (2023). "Abortion Pills".
1495:"Access to abortion pill in the balance as Texas judge hears mifepristone case"
958:
559:
Late on April 12, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit—consisting of
2413:"With Dueling Rulings, Abortion Pill Cases Appear Headed to the Supreme Court"
1432:"Reversing abortion drug's approval would harm public interest, U.S. FDA says"
1297:
311:
ruled unanimously on June 13, 2024 that the Alliance did not have association
2602:"Republicans will no longer get to handpick their judges when they sue Biden"
2010:"Ignore the courts? Some Democrats say Texas abortion pill ruling demands it"
1223:
992:
1327:"The Shadow Medical Community Behind the Attempt to Ban Medication Abortion"
1064:"Medical Groups Ask FDA To Ease Access To Abortion Pill During The Pandemic"
654:
2748:
2697:
1241:
1215:
1000:
339:(FDA) in September 2000. Medication abortion accounts for over half of all
2730:
1844:"Here's what the Supreme Court abortion pill ruling means and what's next"
2509:
2371:"Rival rulings on medication abortion hypercharge the post-Roe legal war"
2014:
1758:
1371:
1261:
984:
103:
2689:
2481:
1961:
1583:"Journal publisher retracts abortion pill studies cited by Texas judge"
1560:
Weber, Paul J.; Perrone, Matthew; Lindsay, Whitehurst (April 8, 2023).
1436:
957:
Zettler, Patricia J.; Adashi, Eli Y.; Cohen, I. Glenn (March 9, 2023).
2668:
2274:"Unpacking the flawed science cited in the Texas abortion pill ruling"
1958:"Biden administration takes abortion-pill dispute to US Supreme Court"
1906:"Appeals court appears likely to restrict access to key abortion pill"
863:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
848:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
16:
Court case challenging the legality of medication abortion in the U.S.
2390:"Judge Invalidates F.D.A. Approval of the Abortion Pill Mifepristone"
415:
The plaintiffs are represented by the Christian legal advocacy group
2634:
2310:"'Unborn human': the anti-abortion rhetoric of Texas judge's ruling"
2143:"'Unborn human': the anti-abortion rhetoric of Texas judge's ruling"
920:"Where Restrictions on Abortion Pills Could Matter Most in the U.S."
1987:"Reaction to Texas Abortion Pill Ruling: Outrage, and Muted Praise"
1634:"DOJ asks appeals court for emergency stay of abortion pill ruling"
1045:"Legal Challenges to the FDA Approval of Medication Abortion Pills"
1904:
Marimow, Ann E; Kitchener, Caroline; Stein, Perry (May 17, 2023).
1137:"Abortion Providers Gear Up for Judge's Ruling Over Pill Approval"
1043:
Sobel, Laurie; Salganicoff, Alina; Felix, Mabel (March 13, 2023).
692:
140:
Whether FDA's 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious.
2112:"The Legal Decision That Could Rewrite the Abortion Battle—Again"
882:
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
258:
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
2544:"Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion pill accessibility"
1392:
2505:"Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill"
1842:
Stein, Perry; Amber, Phillips; Ovalle, David (April 21, 2023).
1350:
Franchise Tax Account Status, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
835:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
489:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
143:
Whether the district court properly granted preliminary relief.
35:
29:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
2759:. Legal analysis of the Texas District Court initial opinion (
2548:
2314:
1478:
1113:
1083:"F.D.A. Will Allow Abortion Pills by Mail During the Pandemic"
1028:
1024:"A Drug That Eases Miscarriages Is Difficult For Women To Get"
731:
effects for women who wanted an abortion and were denied one.
2234:"Texas judge delivers on the hopes of his antiabortion world"
763:
GenBioPro's lawsuit would interact with the two other suits.
2755:
Unikowsky, Adam (2023). "Mifepristone and the rule of law".
2641:
Donley, Greer (2022). "Medication Abortion Exceptionalism".
1453:"The Far Right Is Funding Evangelical Super Bowl Sunday Ads"
878:
Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
1278:"Medication abortions are under fire: Here's how they work"
2051:
Kitchener, Caroline; Marimow, Ann E. (February 25, 2023).
1562:"Access to abortion pill in limbo after competing rulings"
470:, the manufacturer of brand-name mifepristone (Mifeprex),
1818:"Supreme Court preserves access to abortion pill for now"
918:
McCann, Allison; Walker, Amy Schoenfeld (March 2, 2023).
2715:"Mifepristone, preemption, and public health federalism"
2031:"Dueling Decisions Leave Abortion Pill's Fate Uncertain"
967:
s Collateral Consequences for Pharmaceutical Regulation"
119:
All. for Hippocratic Med. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin.
2674:
Rebouché, Rachel (2022). "Remote Reproductive Rights".
2053:"The Texas judge who could take down the abortion pill"
1876:
Schnonfield, Zach; Weixel, Nathaniel (April 21, 2023).
1177:"Medication Abortion: New Litigation May Affect Access"
556:, asking the court to stay the district court's order.
2790:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
2338:"Texas judge's rationale on abortion misses the truth"
62:, et al.; v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.
1352:. Texas Office of the Comptroller. December 22, 2022.
1135:
Castronuovo, Celine; Lopez, Ian (February 10, 2023).
798:
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
1611:"Here's What Happens Next in the Abortion Pill Case"
1276:
Tanner, Lindsey; Perrone, Matthew (March 15, 2023).
554:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
536:
Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology
2046:
2044:
1632:Mallin, Alexander; Cathey, Libby (April 10, 2023).
1537:"Two (Wrong) Mifepristone Court Rulings in One Day"
942:
FDA Approval Memorandum re: Mifeprex (mifepristone)
673:(R–MS), although there were not as many responses.
349:
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
246:
235:
230:
159:
149:
129:
114:
109:
99:
81:
67:
54:
47:
26:
2763:) and the Fifth Circuit's emergency stay opinion (
1320:
1318:
1022:Gordon, Mara; McCammon, Sarah (January 10, 2019).
2411:VanSickle, Abbie; Belluck, Pam (April 8, 2023).
2206:Atkins, Chloe; Arkin, Daniel (April 11, 2023).
1985:Astor, Maggie; Chen, David W. (April 7, 2023).
1674:Weber, Paul; Gresko, Jessica (April 13, 2023).
1102:
1100:
1609:Belluck, Pam; Liptak, Adam (April 12, 2023).
1198:"Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2020"
880:, No. 22A901 (U.S. filed April 14, 2023) and
8:
1980:
1978:
747:Within an hour of Kacsmaryk's ruling, Judge
377:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
280:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
419:(ADF). The ADF drafted the law at issue in
2713:Zettler, Patricia J.; et al. (2022).
1811:
1809:
1807:
1805:
1778:
1776:
23:
2738:
2267:
2265:
2263:
2261:
2137:
2135:
2133:
2131:
2029:Brown, Elizabeth Nolan (April 10, 2023).
2008:Ollstein, Alice Maranda (April 8, 2023).
1871:
1869:
1360:
1358:
1231:
1175:Staman, Jennifer A. (February 14, 2023).
884:, No. 22A902 (U.S. filed April 14, 2023).
523:'s prohibition on interstate shipment of
410:Christian Medical and Dental Associations
357:Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies
2303:
2301:
2201:
2199:
961:Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
815:Judicial Conference of the United States
27:FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
2170:
2168:
2166:
2164:
952:
950:
910:
826:
457:Department of Health and Human Services
449:Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
2795:Political history of the United States
2677:American Journal of Law & Medicine
2177:"Ruling echoes anti-abortion rhetoric"
1581:Weixel, Nathanial (February 6, 2024).
792:may cause more visits to the doctor."
483:Texas District Court opinion and order
2820:Alliance Defending Freedom litigation
2805:United States administrative case law
2232:Kitchener, Caroline (April 8, 2023).
1430:Pierson, Brendan (January 17, 2023).
1386:Kimball, Spencer (January 24, 2023).
1203:Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
435:The original defendants are the FDA,
21:2024 United States Supreme Court case
7:
2336:Bartlett, Jessica (April 11, 2023).
2070:Millhiser, Ian (December 17, 2022).
1930:Kimball, Spencer (August 16, 2023).
1535:Adler, Jonathan H. (April 8, 2023).
1514:Stern, Mark Joseph (April 7, 2023).
1255:Luthra, Shefali (February 7, 2023).
850:, No. 2:22-cv-00223, ECF No. 1, at 1
443:, Principal Deputy Commissioner Dr.
353:Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
275:Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
2669:https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad005
2574:Hurley, Lawrence (March 12, 2024).
2430:Gonzalez, Oriana (April 13, 2023).
2308:de Vogue, Ariane (April 12, 2023).
2110:Fattal, Isabel (February 8, 2023).
1956:Chung, Andrew (September 8, 2023).
1783:Kimball, Spencer (April 21, 2023).
1700:Kimball, Spencer (April 14, 2023).
1365:Atkins, Chloe (February 10, 2023).
1325:Smith, Jordan (February 28, 2023).
1298:"Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine"
575:Supreme Court emergency stay ruling
548:Fifth Circuit emergency stay ruling
335:. Mifepristone was approved by the
2719:Journal of Law and the Biosciences
2665:Journal of Law and the Biosciences
2503:Hurley, Lawrence (June 13, 2024).
1493:Nowell, Cecilia (March 15, 2023).
1451:Perez, Andrew (February 6, 2023).
1407:Belluck, Pam (February 24, 2023).
728:American Psychological Association
355:was amended to require the use of
309:Supreme Court of the United States
41:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
2600:Millhiser, Ian (March 12, 2024).
2542:Totenberg, Nina (June 13, 2024).
2449:Snead, Tierney (April 19, 2023).
1752:Quinn, Melissa (April 19, 2022).
1302:Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
1156:Shutt, Jennifer (March 1, 2023).
541:Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America
406:American College of Pediatricians
2475:Sherman, Mark (March 26, 2024).
2369:Sneed, Tierney (April 8, 2023).
2091:Quinn, Melissa (March 2, 2023).
1816:Sherman, Mark (April 22, 2023).
1107:Choi, Annette (March 25, 2024).
1062:McCammon, Sarah (May 27, 2020).
511:. Kacsmaryk then ruled that the
34:
2800:United States abortion case law
1726:Dwyer, Devin (April 15, 2023).
1651:Belluck, Pam (April 13, 2023).
1081:Belluck, Pam (April 13, 2021).
972:New England Journal of Medicine
2815:2024 in United States case law
2810:2023 in United States case law
2388:Belluck, Pam (April 7, 2023).
1472:Cole, Devan (March 13, 2023).
1182:Congressional Research Service
437:Commissioner of Food and Drugs
341:abortions in the United States
1:
2175:Reed, Tina (April 10, 2023).
647:Democratic National Committee
604:' (emergency rulings with no
2785:Food and Drug Administration
513:Administrative Procedure Act
337:Food and Drug Administration
269:, a drug frequently used in
263:Food and Drug Administration
60:Food and Drug Administration
852:(N.D. Texas April 7, 2023).
631:United States Supreme Court
466:. Later on in the lawsuit,
372:United States Supreme Court
2836:
1049:KFF: Women's Health Policy
944:. FDA. September 28, 2000.
867:(5th Cir. April 10, 2023).
865:, No. 23-10362, ECF No. 20
716:Charlotte Lozier Institute
653:. Some, including Senator
487:The case was filed in the
417:Alliance Defending Freedom
893:The state parties in the
657:(D–OR) and Congresswoman
164:
154:
134:
33:
659:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
283:in 2022, which reversed
689:anti-abortion movements
509:organizational standing
1216:10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1
724:abortionchangesyou.com
517:statute of limitations
500:preliminary injunction
1542:The Volokh Conspiracy
1419:on February 25, 2023.
1339:on February 28, 2023.
700:"chemical abortion."
623:Jennifer Walker Elrod
613:Fifth Circuit hearing
239:Kavanaugh, joined by
223:Ketanji Brown Jackson
50:Decided June 13, 2024
48:Argued March 26, 2024
2124:on February 9, 2023.
985:10.1056/NEJMp2301813
493:Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
294:Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
265:(FDA)'s approval of
2731:10.1093/jlb/lsac037
2690:10.1017/amj.2022.29
2631:Stanford Law Review
2279:The Washington Post
2239:The Washington Post
2057:The Washington Post
1910:The Washington Post
1848:The Washington Post
711:The Washington Post
491:and heard by Judge
425:Gestational Age Act
130:Questions presented
2644:Cornell Law Review
2417:The New York Times
2394:The New York Times
1991:The New York Times
1663:on April 13, 2023.
1657:The New York Times
1621:on April 12, 2023.
1615:The New York Times
1413:The New York Times
1162:Wisconsin Examiner
1093:on April 14, 2021.
1087:The New York Times
924:The New York Times
598:dissenting opinion
565:Kurt D. Engelhardt
468:Danco Laboratories
453:Patrizia Cavazzoni
447:, Director of the
380:, which overruled
370:In June 2022, the
175:Associate Justices
2400:on April 7, 2023.
2350:on April 11, 2023
2286:on April 13, 2023
1997:on April 8, 2023.
1854:on April 22, 2023
931:on March 2, 2023.
365:COVID-19 pandemic
254:
253:
215:Amy Coney Barrett
2827:
2752:
2742:
2709:
2684:(2–3): 244–255.
2660:
2617:
2616:
2614:
2612:
2597:
2591:
2590:
2588:
2586:
2571:
2565:
2560:
2554:
2553:
2539:
2533:
2528:
2522:
2521:
2519:
2517:
2500:
2494:
2493:
2491:
2489:
2472:
2466:
2465:
2463:
2461:
2446:
2440:
2439:
2427:
2421:
2420:
2408:
2402:
2401:
2396:. Archived from
2385:
2379:
2378:
2366:
2360:
2359:
2357:
2355:
2346:. Archived from
2343:The Boston Globe
2333:
2327:
2326:
2324:
2322:
2305:
2296:
2295:
2293:
2291:
2282:. Archived from
2269:
2256:
2255:
2253:
2251:
2246:on April 8, 2023
2242:. Archived from
2229:
2223:
2222:
2220:
2218:
2203:
2194:
2193:
2191:
2189:
2172:
2159:
2158:
2156:
2154:
2139:
2126:
2125:
2120:. Archived from
2107:
2101:
2100:
2088:
2082:
2081:
2067:
2061:
2060:
2048:
2039:
2038:
2026:
2020:
2019:
2005:
1999:
1998:
1993:. Archived from
1982:
1973:
1972:
1970:
1968:
1953:
1947:
1946:
1944:
1942:
1927:
1921:
1920:
1918:
1916:
1901:
1895:
1894:
1892:
1890:
1873:
1864:
1863:
1861:
1859:
1850:. Archived from
1839:
1833:
1832:
1830:
1828:
1822:Associated Press
1813:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1795:
1780:
1771:
1770:
1768:
1766:
1749:
1743:
1742:
1740:
1738:
1723:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1712:
1697:
1691:
1690:
1688:
1686:
1680:Associated Press
1671:
1665:
1664:
1659:. Archived from
1648:
1642:
1641:
1629:
1623:
1622:
1617:. Archived from
1606:
1600:
1599:
1597:
1595:
1578:
1572:
1571:
1567:Associated Press
1557:
1551:
1550:
1532:
1526:
1525:
1511:
1505:
1504:
1490:
1484:
1483:
1469:
1463:
1462:
1448:
1442:
1441:
1427:
1421:
1420:
1415:. Archived from
1404:
1398:
1397:
1383:
1377:
1376:
1362:
1353:
1347:
1341:
1340:
1335:. Archived from
1322:
1313:
1312:
1310:
1308:
1294:
1288:
1287:
1273:
1267:
1266:
1252:
1246:
1245:
1235:
1193:
1187:
1186:
1172:
1166:
1165:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1132:
1126:
1125:
1123:
1121:
1104:
1095:
1094:
1089:. Archived from
1078:
1072:
1071:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1019:
1013:
1012:
954:
945:
939:
933:
932:
927:. Archived from
915:
898:
891:
885:
874:
868:
859:
853:
844:
838:
837:, Docket 23-236.
831:
737:uterine bleeding
671:Cindy Hyde-Smith
561:Catharina Haynes
423:, Mississippi's
271:medical abortion
160:Court membership
38:
37:
24:
2835:
2834:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2775:
2774:
2712:
2673:
2640:
2626:
2624:Further reading
2621:
2620:
2610:
2608:
2599:
2598:
2594:
2584:
2582:
2573:
2572:
2568:
2561:
2557:
2541:
2540:
2536:
2529:
2525:
2515:
2513:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2487:
2485:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2459:
2457:
2448:
2447:
2443:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2410:
2409:
2405:
2387:
2386:
2382:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2353:
2351:
2335:
2334:
2330:
2320:
2318:
2307:
2306:
2299:
2289:
2287:
2271:
2270:
2259:
2249:
2247:
2231:
2230:
2226:
2216:
2214:
2205:
2204:
2197:
2187:
2185:
2174:
2173:
2162:
2152:
2150:
2149:. April 8, 2023
2141:
2140:
2129:
2109:
2108:
2104:
2090:
2089:
2085:
2069:
2068:
2064:
2050:
2049:
2042:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1984:
1983:
1976:
1966:
1964:
1955:
1954:
1950:
1940:
1938:
1929:
1928:
1924:
1914:
1912:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1888:
1886:
1875:
1874:
1867:
1857:
1855:
1841:
1840:
1836:
1826:
1824:
1815:
1814:
1803:
1793:
1791:
1782:
1781:
1774:
1764:
1762:
1751:
1750:
1746:
1736:
1734:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1710:
1708:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1684:
1682:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1631:
1630:
1626:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1593:
1591:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1364:
1363:
1356:
1348:
1344:
1324:
1323:
1316:
1306:
1304:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1119:
1117:
1106:
1105:
1098:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1021:
1020:
1016:
956:
955:
948:
940:
936:
917:
916:
912:
907:
902:
901:
892:
888:
875:
871:
860:
856:
845:
841:
832:
828:
823:
807:
778:
769:
760:generic version
745:
643:Hakeem Jeffries
639:
615:
594:Clarence Thomas
577:
550:
532:Sage Publishing
485:
480:
433:
402:Amarillo, Texas
397:
392:
325:
292:District Judge
213:
211:Brett Kavanaugh
201:
191:Sonia Sotomayor
189:
179:Clarence Thomas
74:
49:
43:
28:
22:
17:
12:
11:
5:
2833:
2831:
2823:
2822:
2817:
2812:
2807:
2802:
2797:
2792:
2787:
2777:
2776:
2773:
2772:
2753:
2725:(2). lsac037.
2710:
2671:
2661:
2651:(3): 627–704.
2638:
2625:
2622:
2619:
2618:
2592:
2566:
2555:
2534:
2523:
2495:
2467:
2441:
2422:
2403:
2380:
2361:
2328:
2297:
2257:
2224:
2195:
2160:
2127:
2102:
2083:
2062:
2040:
2021:
2000:
1974:
1948:
1922:
1896:
1865:
1834:
1801:
1772:
1744:
1718:
1692:
1666:
1643:
1624:
1601:
1573:
1552:
1527:
1506:
1485:
1464:
1443:
1422:
1399:
1378:
1354:
1342:
1314:
1289:
1268:
1247:
1188:
1167:
1148:
1127:
1096:
1073:
1054:
1035:
1014:
946:
934:
909:
908:
906:
903:
900:
899:
886:
869:
854:
839:
825:
824:
822:
819:
811:judge shopping
806:
803:
777:
774:
768:
765:
749:Thomas O. Rice
744:
741:
682:forum shopping
651:Jaime Harrison
638:
635:
627:Cory T. Wilson
614:
611:
576:
573:
549:
546:
525:abortifacients
484:
481:
479:
476:
464:Xavier Becerra
445:Janet Woodcock
432:
429:
396:
393:
391:
388:
324:
321:
252:
251:
248:
244:
243:
237:
233:
232:
228:
227:
226:
225:
176:
173:
168:
162:
161:
157:
156:
152:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
138:
132:
131:
127:
126:
116:
112:
111:
107:
106:
101:
97:
96:
83:
79:
78:
69:
65:
64:
56:
55:Full case name
52:
51:
45:
44:
39:
31:
30:
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2832:
2821:
2818:
2816:
2813:
2811:
2808:
2806:
2803:
2801:
2798:
2796:
2793:
2791:
2788:
2786:
2783:
2782:
2780:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2741:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2678:
2672:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2639:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2627:
2623:
2607:
2603:
2596:
2593:
2581:
2577:
2570:
2567:
2564:
2559:
2556:
2551:
2550:
2545:
2538:
2535:
2532:
2527:
2524:
2512:
2511:
2506:
2499:
2496:
2484:
2483:
2478:
2471:
2468:
2456:
2452:
2445:
2442:
2437:
2433:
2426:
2423:
2418:
2414:
2407:
2404:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2384:
2381:
2376:
2372:
2365:
2362:
2349:
2345:
2344:
2339:
2332:
2329:
2317:
2316:
2311:
2304:
2302:
2298:
2285:
2281:
2280:
2275:
2268:
2266:
2264:
2262:
2258:
2245:
2241:
2240:
2235:
2228:
2225:
2213:
2209:
2202:
2200:
2196:
2184:
2183:
2178:
2171:
2169:
2167:
2165:
2161:
2148:
2144:
2138:
2136:
2134:
2132:
2128:
2123:
2119:
2118:
2113:
2106:
2103:
2098:
2094:
2087:
2084:
2079:
2078:
2073:
2066:
2063:
2058:
2054:
2047:
2045:
2041:
2036:
2032:
2025:
2022:
2017:
2016:
2011:
2004:
2001:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1981:
1979:
1975:
1967:September 10,
1963:
1959:
1952:
1949:
1937:
1933:
1926:
1923:
1911:
1907:
1900:
1897:
1885:
1884:
1879:
1872:
1870:
1866:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1838:
1835:
1823:
1819:
1812:
1810:
1808:
1806:
1802:
1790:
1786:
1779:
1777:
1773:
1761:
1760:
1755:
1748:
1745:
1733:
1729:
1722:
1719:
1707:
1703:
1696:
1693:
1681:
1677:
1670:
1667:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1647:
1644:
1639:
1635:
1628:
1625:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1605:
1602:
1590:
1589:
1584:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1568:
1563:
1556:
1553:
1548:
1547:
1543:
1538:
1531:
1528:
1523:
1522:
1517:
1510:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1496:
1489:
1486:
1481:
1480:
1475:
1468:
1465:
1460:
1459:
1454:
1447:
1444:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1426:
1423:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1403:
1400:
1395:
1394:
1389:
1382:
1379:
1374:
1373:
1368:
1361:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1343:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1332:The Intercept
1328:
1321:
1319:
1315:
1303:
1299:
1293:
1290:
1285:
1284:
1279:
1272:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1258:
1251:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1199:
1192:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1178:
1171:
1168:
1163:
1159:
1152:
1149:
1144:
1143:
1142:Bloomberg Law
1138:
1131:
1128:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1103:
1101:
1097:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1077:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1058:
1055:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1025:
1018:
1015:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:
968:
966:
962:
953:
951:
947:
943:
938:
935:
930:
926:
925:
921:
914:
911:
904:
896:
890:
887:
883:
879:
873:
870:
866:
864:
858:
855:
851:
849:
843:
840:
836:
830:
827:
820:
818:
816:
812:
804:
802:
800:
799:
793:
791:
785:
783:
775:
773:
767:Supreme Court
766:
764:
761:
756:
753:
750:
743:Related cases
742:
740:
738:
732:
729:
725:
719:
717:
713:
712:
707:
706:
701:
698:
694:
690:
685:
683:
679:
674:
672:
668:
664:
663:Chuck Schumer
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
636:
634:
632:
628:
624:
620:
612:
610:
607:
606:oral argument
603:
602:shadow docket
599:
595:
591:
585:
582:
574:
572:
570:
569:Andrew Oldham
566:
562:
557:
555:
547:
545:
542:
537:
533:
528:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
501:
496:
494:
490:
482:
477:
475:
474:in the case.
473:
469:
465:
462:
461:HHS Secretary
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:Robert Califf
438:
430:
428:
426:
422:
418:
413:
411:
407:
403:
394:
389:
387:
385:
384:
379:
378:
373:
368:
366:
360:
358:
354:
350:
344:
342:
338:
334:
330:
322:
320:
318:
314:
310:
305:
303:
302:another order
299:
298:Fifth Circuit
295:
290:
288:
287:
282:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
249:
245:
242:
238:
234:
231:Case opinions
229:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:Chief Justice
166:
165:
163:
158:
153:
148:
142:
139:
136:
135:
133:
128:
124:
120:
117:
113:
108:
105:
104:Oral argument
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
84:
80:
77:
73:
70:
66:
63:
61:
57:
53:
46:
42:
32:
25:
19:
2756:
2722:
2718:
2681:
2675:
2664:
2648:
2642:
2635:SSRN 4335735
2609:. Retrieved
2605:
2595:
2583:. Retrieved
2579:
2569:
2558:
2547:
2537:
2526:
2514:. Retrieved
2508:
2498:
2486:. Retrieved
2480:
2470:
2458:. Retrieved
2454:
2444:
2435:
2425:
2416:
2406:
2398:the original
2393:
2383:
2374:
2364:
2352:. Retrieved
2348:the original
2341:
2331:
2319:. Retrieved
2313:
2288:. Retrieved
2284:the original
2277:
2248:. Retrieved
2244:the original
2237:
2227:
2215:. Retrieved
2211:
2186:. Retrieved
2180:
2151:. Retrieved
2147:The Guardian
2146:
2122:the original
2117:The Atlantic
2115:
2105:
2096:
2086:
2075:
2065:
2056:
2034:
2024:
2013:
2003:
1995:the original
1990:
1965:. Retrieved
1951:
1939:. Retrieved
1935:
1925:
1913:. Retrieved
1909:
1899:
1887:. Retrieved
1881:
1856:. Retrieved
1852:the original
1847:
1837:
1825:. Retrieved
1821:
1792:. Retrieved
1788:
1763:. Retrieved
1757:
1747:
1735:. Retrieved
1731:
1721:
1709:. Retrieved
1705:
1695:
1683:. Retrieved
1679:
1669:
1661:the original
1656:
1646:
1637:
1627:
1619:the original
1614:
1604:
1592:. Retrieved
1586:
1576:
1565:
1555:
1540:
1530:
1519:
1509:
1500:The Guardian
1498:
1488:
1477:
1467:
1456:
1446:
1435:
1425:
1417:the original
1412:
1402:
1391:
1381:
1370:
1345:
1337:the original
1330:
1305:. Retrieved
1301:
1292:
1281:
1271:
1260:
1250:
1210:(10): 1–27.
1207:
1201:
1191:
1180:
1170:
1161:
1151:
1140:
1130:
1118:. Retrieved
1112:
1091:the original
1086:
1076:
1067:
1057:
1048:
1038:
1027:
1017:
976:
970:
964:
960:
937:
929:the original
922:
913:
894:
889:
881:
877:
872:
862:
857:
847:
842:
834:
829:
808:
796:
794:
789:
786:
779:
770:
757:
754:
746:
733:
723:
720:
709:
703:
702:
696:
686:
678:Donald Trump
675:
667:Patty Murray
640:
616:
586:
581:Samuel Alito
578:
558:
551:
535:
529:
521:Comstock Act
515:'s six-year
497:
486:
434:
420:
414:
398:
381:
375:
369:
361:
345:
329:mifepristone
326:
306:
291:
284:
278:
267:mifepristone
257:
256:
255:
240:
218:
206:
203:Neil Gorsuch
194:
187:Samuel Alito
182:
171:John Roberts
118:
110:Case history
90:
58:
18:
1594:February 6,
979:(10): e29.
782:Article III
665:(D–NY) and
645:(D–NY) and
619:James C. Ho
383:Roe v. Wade
333:misoprostol
317:Article III
286:Roe v. Wade
247:Concurrence
199:Elena Kagan
121:, 78 F.4th
68:Docket nos.
2779:Categories
1941:August 17,
905:References
895:Washington
472:intervened
431:Defendants
395:Plaintiffs
323:Background
2706:256359216
2488:March 27,
2460:April 21,
2354:April 22,
2321:April 22,
2290:April 22,
2250:April 22,
2217:April 22,
2188:April 22,
2153:April 22,
1889:April 22,
1858:April 22,
1827:April 22,
1794:April 22,
1765:April 22,
1737:April 22,
1711:April 22,
1685:April 13,
1224:1546-0738
1120:March 27,
1009:257099568
993:0028-4793
655:Ron Wyden
637:Reactions
241:unanimous
82:Citations
2765:part III
2757:Substack
2749:36568649
2698:36715252
2611:April 7,
2585:April 7,
2580:NBC News
2516:June 13,
2510:NBC News
2212:NBC News
2097:CBS News
2015:Politico
1883:The Hill
1759:CBS News
1732:ABC News
1638:ABC News
1588:The Hill
1372:NBC News
1307:March 3,
1283:ABC News
1262:The 19th
1242:36417304
1001:36812454
776:Decision
534:journal
504:standing
374:decided
313:standing
236:Majority
100:Argument
2769:part IV
2761:part II
2740:9774452
2667:10(1)
2657:3795414
2482:AP News
1962:Reuters
1915:May 22,
1458:Jacobin
1437:Reuters
1233:9707346
478:Rulings
390:Lawsuit
150:Holding
2747:
2737:
2704:
2696:
2655:
2035:Reason
1546:Reason
1240:
1230:
1222:
1007:
999:
991:
965:Dobbs'
805:Impact
790:others
649:Chair
625:, and
590:merits
567:, and
459:, and
455:, the
408:, and
351:, the
315:under
250:Thomas
221:
219:·
217:
209:
207:·
205:
197:
195:·
193:
185:
183:·
181:
76:23-236
72:23-235
2702:S2CID
2436:Axios
2182:Axios
1521:Slate
1005:S2CID
821:Notes
705:Axios
693:fetus
421:Dobbs
115:Prior
89:367 (
2767:and
2745:PMID
2694:PMID
2653:SSRN
2613:2024
2587:2024
2518:2024
2490:2024
2462:2023
2356:2023
2323:2023
2292:2023
2252:2023
2219:2023
2190:2023
2155:2023
1969:2023
1943:2023
1936:CNBC
1917:2023
1891:2023
1860:2023
1829:2023
1796:2023
1789:CNBC
1767:2023
1739:2023
1713:2022
1706:CNBC
1687:2023
1596:2024
1393:CNBC
1309:2023
1238:PMID
1220:ISSN
1122:2024
997:PMID
989:ISSN
451:Dr.
439:Dr.
331:and
307:The
92:more
87:U.S.
85:602
2735:PMC
2727:doi
2686:doi
2649:107
2606:Vox
2549:NPR
2455:CNN
2375:CNN
2315:CNN
2077:Vox
1544:at
1479:CNN
1228:PMC
1212:doi
1114:CNN
1068:NPR
1029:NPR
981:doi
977:388
123:210
2781::
2771:).
2743:.
2733:.
2721:.
2717:.
2700:.
2692:.
2682:48
2680:.
2647:.
2604:.
2578:.
2546:.
2507:.
2479:.
2453:.
2434:.
2415:.
2392:.
2373:.
2340:.
2312:.
2300:^
2276:.
2260:^
2236:.
2210:.
2198:^
2179:.
2163:^
2145:.
2130:^
2114:.
2095:.
2074:.
2055:.
2043:^
2033:.
2012:.
1989:.
1977:^
1960:.
1934:.
1908:.
1880:.
1868:^
1846:.
1820:.
1804:^
1787:.
1775:^
1756:.
1730:.
1704:.
1678:.
1655:.
1636:.
1613:.
1585:.
1564:.
1539:.
1518:.
1497:.
1476:.
1455:.
1434:.
1411:.
1390:.
1369:.
1357:^
1329:.
1317:^
1300:.
1280:.
1259:.
1236:.
1226:.
1218:.
1208:71
1206:.
1200:.
1179:.
1160:.
1139:.
1111:.
1099:^
1085:.
1066:.
1047:.
1026:.
1003:.
995:.
987:.
975:.
969:.
963:—
949:^
739:.
697:un
633:.
621:,
563:,
427:.
343:.
2751:.
2729::
2723:9
2708:.
2688::
2659:.
2637:.
2615:.
2589:.
2552:.
2520:.
2492:.
2464:.
2438:.
2419:.
2377:.
2358:.
2325:.
2294:.
2254:.
2221:.
2192:.
2157:.
2099:.
2080:.
2059:.
2037:.
2018:.
1971:.
1945:.
1919:.
1893:.
1862:.
1831:.
1798:.
1769:.
1741:.
1715:.
1689:.
1640:.
1598:.
1570:.
1549:.
1524:.
1503:.
1482:.
1461:.
1440:.
1396:.
1375:.
1311:.
1286:.
1265:.
1244:.
1214::
1185:.
1164:.
1145:.
1124:.
1070:.
1051:.
1032:.
1011:.
983::
959:"
125:.
95:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.