Knowledge

Fair trade impact studies

Source 📝

95:
the non-Fairtrade farmers may be harmed by Fairtrade. These problems arise with both case studies and more general surveys, and are particularly intractable when the appropriate control group is in another country. There have been virtually no base period studies, to determine the position before a cooperative joined Fairtrade, so it is seldom possible to claim that the farmers in a cooperative are better off or have more self-esteem because of Fairtrade, rather than because Fairtrade selects efficient cooperatives with educated, efficient, well-off farmers.
127:
Fairtrade product in a country - valuable but different research. Even if twenty or thirty studies which met the impact evaluation criteria could be identified, it would not be possible to generalize from them because it is not claimed that they are typical. The studies are not of randomly selected cooperatives. They are concentrated on better known, more successful and well established ones, and there are few which examine the problems of cooperatives which have recently joined Fairtrade or of the least successful quartile of Fairtrade cooperatives.
677: 70:, start with the premise that any intervention in an economic system has various impacts throughout that system: some significant, many small; some costs, some benefits; some people benefit, others are harmed. Impact evaluations aim to identify costs and benefits throughout the system, then quantify them, so that people do not make unwarranted claims of impact and so that informed decisions can be made. 22: 119:
that this is typical. The conclusion is rather that secretiveness prevents impact analysis of the full Fairtrade system. Few studies analyse how much extra money is received by the cooperatives, what it is spent on, how much is taken by managers of cooperatives and how much reaches the farmers. Few studies discuss the costs identified in the
104:
and even more difficult to measure any effects on non-Fairtrade farmers in other, poorer, countries. The decision on which such measures to include introduces a bias: it may be asked whether there are other non-money costs or benefits that might be included in the studies which would give answers less favourable to Fairtrade.
98:
The possibility that all groups of farmers have increased incomes because of higher world prices, changed exchange rates etc. is difficult to tackle. As most of the extra money paid by consumers is taken by firms in rich countries or is spent on added costs incurred in meeting Fairtrade standards, it
103:
projects. These are difficult to measure, and it is particularly difficult to measure these non-monetary benefits in control groups of local non-Fairtrade farmers, the extent to which non-Fairtrade farmers lose self-esteem, etc. because they are excluded from Fair trade impact studies, for instance,
94:
to ensure that an impact is the result of the intervention being studied, which is often impossible and always difficult with Fairtrade because of the way that Fairtrade is organized, notably because the Fairtrade farmers and cooperatives are selected from the richer and more efficient, and because
118:
One impact, the amount of money going to businesses in rich countries rather than to Third World producers, is addressed in only a handful of studies. These show that in some cases 90% to 99.5% of the extra money paid by consumers is kept as extra profit by firms in rich countries but cannot show
107:
An unpublished consultancy report prepared for Fairtrade found only 33 studies that met their own criteria (not those of the World Bank or Inter-American Bank) for impact studies. These 33 included unpublished undergraduate and masters’ dissertations, unpublished theses, articles by employees or
126:
There are, however, case studies of Fairtrade cooperatives which do not attempt to be impact studies, identifying and quantifying all positive and negative impacts, but are, rather, examinations of how subsections of the system operate, usually single Fairtrade cooperatives and sometimes one
81:
in America have developed guidelines, but analysis is considered particularly difficult with developing country agriculture. Peter Griffiths has examined the additional problems that arise when analysing the impact of Fairtrade interventions, arising from the way it is organized.
115:, and fewer still that attempt to quantify them. There are few mentions in the literature of the biggest financial costs and benefits, the extra price paid by consumers and the extra profit made by companies in rich countries, and fewer attempts to quantify these. 152:
Winters, P., Salazar, L. and Maffioli, A. ‘Designing impact evaluations for agricultural projects’, Impact Evaluation Guidelines, Strategy Development Division, Technical Notes No. IDB-TN-198. (Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 2010). Accessed at
165:
Angelucci, M. and Di Maro, V. Project Evaluation and Spillover Effects. Impact Evaluation Guidelines, Strategy Development Division, Technical Notes No. IDB-TN-136 (Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 2010). Accessed at
142:
Winters, P., Alessandro Maffioli and Lina Salazar, ‘Introduction to the Special Feature: Evaluating the Impact of Agricultural Projects in Developing Countries’ Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2011, 393–402 doi:
234:
Kilian, B., Jones, C., Pratt, L., & Villalobos, A. (2006). “Is Sustainable Agriculture a Viable Strategy to Improve Farm Income in Central America? A Case Study on Coffee”. Journal of Business Research, 59(3),
657: 225:
Valkila, J., Haaparanta, P., & Niemi, N. (2010). “Empowering Coffee Traders? The Coffee Value Chain from Nicaraguan Fair Trade Farmers to Finnish Consumers.” Journal of Business Ethics, 97:257-270
178:
Michael A. Clemens and Gabriel Demombynes, ‘When Does Rigorous Impact Evaluation Make a Difference? The Case of the Millennium Villages’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5477, 2010
194:
Griffiths, P., ‘Ethical objections to Fairtrade’ Journal of Business Ethics: Volume 105, Issue 3 (2012), Page 357-373 (DOI) 10.1007/s10551-011-0972-0 www.springerlink.com Accessed at
465: 470: 99:
is seldom possible to identify direct financial benefit to farmers, and the studies concentrate on non-monetary benefits, like improvement in self-esteem or the creation of
413: 383: 444: 210: 111:
Griffiths suggests that even this is optimistic: there are very few studies that examine any of the costs identified by critics of Fairtrade in the
294: 206:
Nelson, V., & Pound, B.: 2009, The Last Ten Years: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature on the Impact of Fairtrade. Retrieved from
262: 342: 495: 485: 398: 257: 108:
members of Fairtrade cooperatives, several reports on the same cooperatives, and one report cited under two different titles.
393: 611: 388: 565: 706: 449: 480: 429: 287: 626: 434: 322: 647: 555: 490: 475: 352: 207: 590: 408: 317: 100: 67: 32: 631: 570: 701: 680: 616: 575: 560: 280: 195: 78: 530: 337: 120: 112: 59: 36: 545: 540: 500: 268:
The Center for Fair and Alternative Trade: Scholarly Research on Fair Trade and its Impacts
621: 214: 40: 606: 550: 505: 49: 695: 535: 362: 347: 91: 585: 247: 154: 580: 327: 303: 74: 63: 525: 367: 357: 439: 208:
http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/resources/natural_resources_institute.aspx
167: 403: 252: 196:
http://www.griffithsspeaker.com/Fairtrade/why_fair_trade_isn.htm
276: 258:
World Fair Trade Organization-Europe: Fair trade impact studies
15: 272: 267: 263:
Fair Trade Institute: Collection of fair trade publications
90:
Impact studies require study of the counterfactual, using
45: 471:
Fair Trade Association of Australia & New Zealand
253:
European Fair Trade Association: Impact of fair trade
640: 599: 514: 466:
AsociaciĂłn del Sello de Productos de Comercio Justo
458: 422: 376: 310: 414:International Resources for Fairer Trade (IRFT) 384:Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International 288: 8: 248:Fairtrade International: Impact and research 155:http://www.iadb.org/document.cfm?id=35529432 190: 188: 186: 184: 445:International Fairtrade Certification Mark 295: 281: 273: 440:FLO-CERT (inspection & certification) 506:Fair Trade USA (formerly TransFair USA) 135: 7: 14: 496:Max Havelaar-Stiftung Switzerland 676: 675: 343:Alternative trading organization 143:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2011.00296.x 20: 486:Association Max Havelaar France 399:European Fair Trade Association 394:Network of European Worldshops 168:http://www-personal.umich.edu/ 1: 612:List of Fairtrade settlements 389:World Fair Trade Organization 46:help to improve this article 566:Gepa The Fair Trade Company 723: 671: 450:Fair Trade Certified Mark 333:Fair trade impact studies 481:The Fairtrade Foundation 430:Fair trade certification 435:Fairtrade International 328:Fair trade and politics 323:Fairtrade certification 556:Equal Exchange Trading 491:Stichting Max Havelaar 476:Fairtrade Mark Ireland 353:Trade Justice Movement 591:Ten Thousand Villages 409:Fair Trade Federation 318:History of fair trade 101:community development 68:cost-benefit analysis 632:World Fair Trade Day 571:Handcrafting Justice 459:Labeling initiatives 39:to meet Knowledge's 681:Category:Fair trade 617:Fairtrade fortnight 576:SERRV International 561:Rainforest Alliance 516:Alternative trading 213:2012-01-26 at the 707:Impact assessment 689: 688: 531:Artisans du Monde 338:Fair trade debate 121:Fair trade debate 113:Fair trade debate 60:Impact evaluation 57: 56: 41:quality standards 714: 679: 678: 663: 653: 546:Divine Chocolate 541:Ctm altromercato 501:Fairtrade Canada 297: 290: 283: 274: 236: 232: 226: 223: 217: 204: 198: 192: 179: 176: 170: 163: 157: 150: 144: 140: 35:and may require 24: 23: 16: 722: 721: 717: 716: 715: 713: 712: 711: 692: 691: 690: 685: 667: 661: 659:Brewing Justice 651: 636: 622:Make Trade Fair 595: 519: 517: 510: 454: 418: 372: 306: 301: 244: 239: 233: 229: 224: 220: 215:Wayback Machine 205: 201: 193: 182: 177: 173: 164: 160: 151: 147: 141: 137: 133: 88: 53: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 720: 718: 710: 709: 704: 694: 693: 687: 686: 684: 683: 672: 669: 668: 666: 665: 655: 644: 642: 638: 637: 635: 634: 629: 624: 619: 614: 609: 607:Fairtrade Town 603: 601: 597: 596: 594: 593: 588: 583: 578: 573: 568: 563: 558: 553: 551:Equal Exchange 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 522: 520: 515: 512: 511: 509: 508: 503: 498: 493: 488: 483: 478: 473: 468: 462: 460: 456: 455: 453: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 426: 424: 420: 419: 417: 416: 411: 406: 401: 396: 391: 386: 380: 378: 374: 373: 371: 370: 365: 360: 355: 350: 345: 340: 335: 330: 325: 320: 314: 312: 308: 307: 302: 300: 299: 292: 285: 277: 271: 270: 265: 260: 255: 250: 243: 242:External links 240: 238: 237: 227: 218: 199: 180: 171: 158: 145: 134: 132: 129: 92:control groups 87: 84: 66:systems, like 55: 54: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 719: 708: 705: 703: 700: 699: 697: 682: 674: 673: 670: 664: 660: 656: 654: 650: 646: 645: 643: 639: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 604: 602: 598: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 557: 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 523: 521: 518:organizations 513: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 492: 489: 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 474: 472: 469: 467: 464: 463: 461: 457: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 431: 428: 427: 425: 423:Certification 421: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 385: 382: 381: 379: 375: 369: 366: 364: 363:Body shopping 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 348:Trade justice 346: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 324: 321: 319: 316: 315: 313: 309: 305: 298: 293: 291: 286: 284: 279: 278: 275: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 245: 241: 231: 228: 222: 219: 216: 212: 209: 203: 200: 197: 191: 189: 187: 185: 181: 175: 172: 169: 162: 159: 156: 149: 146: 139: 136: 130: 128: 124: 122: 116: 114: 109: 105: 102: 96: 93: 85: 83: 80: 76: 71: 69: 65: 61: 51: 48:by making it 47: 43: 42: 38: 34: 31:reads like a 29:This article 27: 18: 17: 658: 648: 586:Twin Trading 332: 230: 221: 202: 174: 161: 148: 138: 125: 117: 110: 106: 97: 89: 72: 58: 30: 652:(2006 film) 377:Federations 311:Core topics 702:Fair trade 696:Categories 649:Black Gold 581:Traidcraft 536:CafĂ©direct 358:Sweatshops 304:Fair trade 131:References 79:Inter Bank 75:World Bank 64:fair trade 33:term paper 600:Campaigns 526:Alter Eco 368:Worldshop 44:. Please 627:No Sweat 235:322–330. 211:Archived 52:in tone. 86:Studies 50:neutral 37:cleanup 662:(book) 641:Media 404:FINE 77:and 73:The 62:of 698:: 183:^ 123:. 296:e 289:t 282:v

Index

term paper
cleanup
quality standards
help to improve this article
neutral
Impact evaluation
fair trade
cost-benefit analysis
World Bank
Inter Bank
control groups
community development
Fair trade debate
Fair trade debate
http://www.iadb.org/document.cfm?id=35529432
http://www-personal.umich.edu/




http://www.griffithsspeaker.com/Fairtrade/why_fair_trade_isn.htm
http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/resources/natural_resources_institute.aspx
Archived
Wayback Machine
Fairtrade International: Impact and research
European Fair Trade Association: Impact of fair trade
World Fair Trade Organization-Europe: Fair trade impact studies
Fair Trade Institute: Collection of fair trade publications
The Center for Fair and Alternative Trade: Scholarly Research on Fair Trade and its Impacts
v

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑