Fair use - Knowledge (XXG)

1220:. Lenz notified YouTube immediately that her video was within the scope of fair use, and she demanded that it be restored. YouTube complied after six weeks, rather than the two weeks required by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Lenz then sued Universal Music in California for her legal costs, claiming the music company had acted in bad faith by ordering removal of a video that represented fair use of the song. On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a copyright owner must affirmatively consider whether the complained of conduct constituted fair use before sending a takedown notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, rather than waiting for the alleged infringer to assert fair use. 801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015). "Even if, as Universal urges, fair use is classified as an 'affirmative defense,' we hold—for the purposes of the DMCA—fair use is uniquely situated in copyright law so as to be treated differently than traditional affirmative defenses. We conclude that because 17 U.S.C. § 107 created a type of non-infringing use, fair use is "authorized by the law" and a copyright holder must consider the existence of fair use before sending a takedown notification under § 512(c)." 1076:

the Android operating system to support the mobile device market. Oracle had sued Google in 2010 over both patent and copyright violations, but after two cycles, the case matter was narrowed down to whether Google's use of the definition and SSO of Oracle's Java APIs (determined to be copyrightable) was within fair use. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against Google, stating that while Google could defend its use in the nature of the copyrighted work, its use was not transformative, and more significantly, it commercially harmed Oracle as they were also seeking entry to the mobile market. However, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed this decision, deciding that Google's actions satisfy all four tests for fair use, and that granting Oracle exclusive rights to use Java APIs on mobile markets "would interfere with, not further, copyright's basic creativity objectives."

1178:

the original artwork was. Second, the photographs had already been published, diminishing the significance of their nature as creative works. Third, although normally making a "full" replication of a copyrighted work may appear to violate copyright, here it was found to be reasonable and necessary in light of the intended use. Lastly, the court found that the market for the original photographs would not be substantially diminished by the creation of the thumbnails. To the contrary, the thumbnail searches could increase the exposure of the originals. In looking at all these factors as a whole, the court found that the thumbnails were fair use and remanded the case to the lower court for trial after issuing a revised opinion on July 7, 2003. The remaining issues were resolved with a

1055:

uses cause few problems. A teacher who prints a few copies of a poem to illustrate a technique will have no problem on all four of the above factors (except possibly on amount and substantiality), but some cases are not so clear. All the factors are considered and balanced in each case: a book reviewer who quotes a paragraph as an example of the author's style will probably fall under fair use even though they may sell their review commercially; but a non-profit educational website that reproduces whole articles from technical magazines will probably be found to infringe if the publisher can demonstrate that the website affects the market for the magazine, even though the website itself is non-commercial.

1741:

eight Australian government inquiries which have considered the question of whether fair use should be adopted in Australia. Six reviews have recommended Australia adopt a "Fair Use" model of copyright exceptions: two enquiries specifically into the Copyright Act (1998, 2014); and four broader reviews (both 2004, 2013, 2016). One review (2000) recommended against the introduction of fair use and another (2005) issued no final report. Two of the recommendations were specifically in response to the stricter copyright rules introduced as part of the

938:, the Supreme Court stated that "when a commercial use amounts to mere duplication of the entirety of the original, it clearly supersedes the object of the original and serves as a market replacement for it, making it likely that cognizable market harm to the original will occur". In one instance, a court ruled that this factor weighed against a defendant who had made unauthorized movie trailers for video retailers, since his trailers acted as direct substitutes for the copyright owner's official trailers. 51: 836:

protect. This is not to claim that unpublished works, or, more specifically, works not intended for publication, do not deserve legal protection, but that any such protection should come from laws about privacy, rather than laws about copyright. The statutory fair use provision was amended in response to these concerns by adding a final sentence: "The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors."

757: 1578:

the pictures constituted fair use, such that he did not need permission to use the pictures or to pay royalties for his use. One of the pieces sold for $ 90,000. With regard to the works presented by Painter, the gallery where the pictures were showcased posted notices that "All images are subject to copyright." Several lawsuits were filed against Painter over the New Portraits exhibit. In 2024, Richard Prince and the galleries were ordered to pay $ 900,000 to the photographers.

524:, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 845: 1098:. With the help of an intellectual property lawyer, the creators of Loose Change successfully argued that a majority of the footage used was for historical purposes and was significantly transformed in the context of the film. They agreed to remove a few shots that were used as B-roll and served no purpose to the greater discussion. The case was settled and a potential multimillion-dollar lawsuit was avoided. 625:" reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism. On the other hand, it is as clear, that if he thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticise, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a 550: 1514:, a case involving mass digitisation of millions of books from research library collections. As part of the ruling that found the book digitisation project was fair use, the judge stated "Google Books is also transformative in the sense that it has transformed book text into data for purposes of substantive research, including data mining and text mining in new areas". 1866:

legislated in the abstract. It is the very foundation of the digital age and a cornerstone of our economy," said Ed Black, President and CEO of CCIA. "Much of the unprecedented economic growth of the past ten years can actually be credited to the doctrine of fair use, as the Internet itself depends on the ability to use content in a limited and unlicensed manner."

4437: 1244:

protection. ... It is undisputed that Hoehn posted the entire work in his comment on the Website. ... wholesale copying does not preclude a finding of fair use. ... there is no genuine issue of material fact that Hoehn's use of the Work was fair and summary judgment is appropriate." On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that

1892:

academia shared stories about the importance of fair use to their community. The first Fair Use Week was so successful that in 2015 ARL teamed up with Courtney and helped organize the Second Annual Fair Use Week, with participation from many more institutions. ARL also launched an official Fair Use Week website, which was transferred from

740:

based on Prince's deposition testimony that he "don't really have a message," and that he was not "trying to create anything with a new meaning or a new message." However, the artist's intended message "is not dispositive." Instead, the focus of the transformative use inquiry is how the artworks will "reasonably be perceived".

827:, the aspect of whether the copied work has been previously published was considered crucial, assuming the right of the original author to control the circumstances of the publication of his work or preference not to publish at all. However, Judge Pierre N. Leval views this importation of certain aspects of France's 1372:

tried to justify his appropriation of Art Rogers' photograph "Puppies" in his sculpture "String of Puppies" with the same parody defense. Koons lost because his work was not presented as a parody of Rogers' photograph in particular, but as a satire of society at large. This was insufficient to render

1269:

was created in 2005, it was nearly impossible to obtain errors and omissions insurance for copyright clearance work that relied in part on fair use. This meant documentarians had either to obtain a license for the material or to cut it from their films. In many cases, it was impossible to license the

1177:

found in favor of the defendant, Arriba Soft. In reaching its decision, the court utilized the statutory four-factor analysis. First, it found the purpose of creating the thumbnail images as previews to be sufficiently transformative, noting that they were not meant to be viewed at high resolution as

1054:

The practical effect of the fair use doctrine is that a number of conventional uses of copyrighted works are not considered infringing. For instance, quoting from a copyrighted work in order to criticize or comment upon it or teach students about it, is considered a fair use. Certain well-established

1046:

use of non-public domain material, even in situations where a fair use defense would likely succeed. The simple reason is that the license terms negotiated with the copyright owner may be much less expensive than defending against a copyright suit, or having the mere possibility of a lawsuit threaten

743:

The transformativeness inquiry is a deceptively simple test to determine whether a new work has a different purpose and character from an original work. However, courts have not been consistent in deciding whether something is transformative. For instance, in Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc., 725 F.3d 1170

1773:

establishes fair dealing in Canada, which allows specific exceptions to copyright protection. In 1985, the Sub-Committee on the Revision of Copyright rejected replacing fair dealing with an open-ended system, and in 1986 the Canadian government agreed that "the present fair dealing provisions should

971:

ideas. One can plagiarize even a work that is not protected by copyright, for example by passing off a line from Shakespeare as one's own. Conversely, attribution prevents accusations of plagiarism, but it does not prevent infringement of copyright. For example, reprinting a copyrighted book without

898:

The fourth factor measures the effect that the allegedly infringing use has had on the copyright owner's ability to exploit his original work. The court not only investigates whether the defendant's specific use of the work has significantly harmed the copyright owner's market, but also whether such

351:. The fair use right is a general exception that applies to all different kinds of uses with all types of works. In the U.S., fair use right/exception is based on a flexible proportionality test that examines the purpose of the use, the amount used, and the impact on the market of the original work. 1740:

While Australian copyright exceptions are based on the Fair Dealing system, since 1998 a series of Australian government inquiries have examined, and in most cases recommended, the introduction of a "flexible and open" Fair Use system into Australian copyright law. From 1998 to 2017 there have been

1683:

Compared to the United States, Polish fair use distinguishes between private and public use. In Poland, when the use is public, its use risks fines. The defendant must also prove that his use was private when accused that it was not, or that other mitigating circumstances apply. Finally, Polish law

1075:

case revolves around the use of application programming interfaces (APIs) used to define functionality of the Java programming language, created by Sun Microsystems and now owned by Oracle Corporation. Google used the APIs' definition and their structure, sequence and organization (SSO) in creating

941:

Second, courts also consider whether potential market harm might exist beyond that of direct substitution, such as in the potential existence of a licensing market. This consideration has weighed against commercial copy shops that make copies of articles in course-packs for college students, when a

1709:

In determining whether art. 35-3(1) above applies to a use of copyrighted work, the following factors must be considered: the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is of a non profit nature; the type or purpose of the copyrighted work; the amount

1577:

in New York, entitled "New Portraits". His exhibit consisted of screenshots of Instagram users' pictures, which were largely unaltered, with Prince's commentary added beneath. Although no Instagram users authorized Prince to use their pictures, Prince argued that the addition of his own commentary

607:

The first factor is "the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes." To justify the use as fair, one must demonstrate how it either advances knowledge or the progress of the arts through the addition of something

354:

The doctrine of "fair use" originated in common law during the 18th and 19th centuries as a way of preventing copyright law from being too rigidly applied and "stifling the very creativity which law is designed to foster." Though originally a common law doctrine, it was enshrined in statutory law

1725:

Fair dealing allows specific exceptions to copyright protections. The open-ended concept of fair use is generally not observed in jurisdictions where fair dealing is in place, although this does vary. Fair dealing is established in legislation in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore, India,

1243:

in a comment as part of an online discussion was unarguably fair use. Judge Pro noted that "Noncommercial, nonprofit use is presumptively fair. ... Hoehn posted the Work as part of an online discussion. ... This purpose is consistent with comment, for which 17 U.S.C. § 107 provides fair use

747:

Conversely, the Second Circuit came to the opposite conclusion in a similar situation in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 11 F.4th 26 (2d. Cir. 2021). In that case, the Warhol Foundation sought a declaratory judgment that Warhol's use of one of Goldsmith's celebrity

739:

shed light on how transformative use is determined. "What is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer, not simply what an artist might say about a particular piece or body of work." The district court's conclusion that Prince's work was not transformative is partly

1891:

in February 2014, with a full week of activities celebrating fair use. The first Fair Use Week included blog posts from national and international fair use experts, live fair use panels, fair use workshops, and a Fair Use Stories Tumblr blog, where people from the world of art, music, film, and

577:

reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism. On the other hand, it is as clear, that if he thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticize, but to

1606:

published a compilation of portions of over 40 nations' laws that explicitly mention fair use or fair dealing, and asserts that some of the fair dealing laws, such as Canada's, have evolved (such as through judicial precedents) to be quite close to those of the United States. This compilation

835:

of the artist) into American copyright law as "bizarre and contradictory" because it sometimes grants greater protection to works that were created for private purposes that have little to do with the public goals of copyright law, than to those works that copyright was initially conceived to

1865:

The study found that fair use dependent industries are directly responsible for more than eighteen percent of US economic growth and nearly eleven million American jobs. "As the United States economy becomes increasingly knowledge-based, the concept of fair use can no longer be discussed and

1634:

passed a new copyright law that included a U.S.-style fair use exception. The law, which took effect in May 2008, permits the fair use of copyrighted works for purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review, news reporting, quotation, or instruction or testing by an educational

1050:

Fair use rights take precedence over the author's interest. Thus the copyright holder cannot use a non-binding disclaimer, or notification, to revoke the right of fair use on works. However, binding agreements such as contracts or licence agreements may take precedence over fair use rights.

418:

for teaching and library archiving in the U.S. are located in a different section of the statute. A similar-sounding principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions but in fact it is more similar in principle to the enumerated exceptions found under civil law systems.

1256:

In addition to considering the four fair use factors, courts deciding fair use cases also look to the standards and practices of the professional community where the case comes from. Among the communities are documentarians, librarians, makers of Open Courseware, visual art educators, and

1106:

also relied on fair use to feature several clips from copyrighted Hollywood productions. The director had originally planned to license these clips from their studio owners but discovered that studio licensing agreements would have prohibited him from using this material to criticize the

598:

has written, the statute does not "define or explain contours or objectives." While it "leav open the possibility that other factors may bear on the question, the statute identifies none." That is, courts are entitled to consider other factors in addition to the four statutory factors.

338:

material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder. Fair use is one of the limitations to copyright intended to balance the interests of copyright holders with the public interest in the wider distribution and use of creative works by allowing as a defense to

1816:

Within the United Kingdom, fair dealing is a legal doctrine that provides an exception to the nation's copyright law in cases where the copyright infringement is for the purposes of non-commercial research or study, criticism or review, or for the reporting of current events.

1398:" in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew's version as a ridiculing commentary on the earlier work, and ruled that when the parody was itself the product rather than mere advertising, commercial nature did not bar the defense. The 1874:

Fair Use Week is an international event that celebrates fair use and fair dealing. Fair Use Week was first proposed on a Fair Use Allies listserv, which was an outgrowth of the Library Code of Best Practices Capstone Event, celebrating the development and promulgation of

1710:

and importance of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; the effect of the use of the copyrighted work upon the current market or the current value of the copyrighted work or on the potential market or the potential value of the copyrighted work.

1342:

of a copyrighted work have been sued for infringement by the targets of their ridicule, even though such use may be protected as fair use. These fair use cases distinguish between parodies, which use a work in order to poke fun at or comment on the work itself, and

774:

Although the Supreme Court has ruled that the availability of copyright protection should not depend on the artistic quality or merit of a work, fair use analyses consider certain aspects of the work to be relevant, such as whether it is fictional or non-fictional.

1406:, which they described as a broader social critique not intrinsically tied to ridicule of a specific work and so not deserving of the same use exceptions as parody because the satirist's ideas are capable of expression without the use of the other particular work. 918:

the case regarding President Ford's memoirs, the Supreme Court labeled the fourth factor "the single most important element of fair use" and it has enjoyed some level of primacy in fair use analyses ever since. Yet the Supreme Court's more recent announcement in

581:

In short, we must often ... look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.

966:

and copyright infringement are related matters, they are not identical. Plagiarism (using someone's words, ideas, images, etc. without acknowledgment) is a matter of professional ethics, while copyright is a matter of law, and protects exact expression,

1260:

Such codes of best practices have permitted communities of practice to make more informed risk assessments in employing fair use in their daily practice. For instance, broadcasters, cablecasters, and distributors typically require filmmakers to obtain

573:, in which the defendant had copied 353 pages from the plaintiff's 12-volume biography of George Washington in order to produce a separate two-volume work of his own. The court rejected the defendant's fair use defense with the following explanation: 744:(9th Cir. 2013), the court found that Green Day's use of Seltzer's copyrighted Scream Icon was transformative. The court held that Green Day's modifications to the original Scream Icon conveyed new information and aesthetics from the original piece. 1825:

A balanced copyright law provides an economic benefit to many high-tech businesses such as search engines and software developers. Fair use is also crucial to non-technology industries such as insurance, legal services, and newspaper publishers.

4724: 1853:

and other high-tech companies, released a study that found that fair use exceptions to US copyright laws were responsible for more than $ 4.5 trillion in annual revenue for the United States economy representing one-sixth of the total US

1586:

While U.S. fair use law has been influential in some countries, some countries have fair use criteria drastically different from those in the U.S., and some countries do not have a fair use framework at all. Some countries have the concept of

4311: 4894: 1347:, which comments on something else. Courts have been more willing to grant fair use protections to parodies than to satires, but the ultimate outcome in either circumstance will turn on the application of the four fair use factors. 4407: 950:

Courts recognize that certain kinds of market harm do not negate fair use, such as when a parody or negative review impairs the market of the original work. Copyright considerations may not shield a work against adverse criticism.

492:

granted to the author of a creative work by copyright law: "Fair use is therefore distinct from affirmative defenses where a use infringes a copyright, but there is no liability due to a valid excuse, e.g., misuse of a copyright."

667:

in a collage painting. Koons appropriated a central portion of an advertisement she had been commissioned to shoot for a magazine. Koons prevailed in part because his use was found transformative under the first fair use factor.

4181:

The Scope of Fair Use: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, January 28,

3707: 1642:

that fair use is a user right. The court also ruled that streaming of live soccer games on the Internet is fair use. In doing so, the court analyzed the four fair use factors adopted in 2007 and cited U.S. case law, including

4916: 4650: 879:

However, even the use of a small percentage of a work can make the third factor unfavorable to the defendant, because the "substantiality" of the portion used is considered in addition to the amount used. For instance, in

1663:

An amendment in 2012 to the section 13(2)(a) of the Copyright Act 1987 created an exception called 'fair dealing' which is not restricted in its purpose. The four factors for fair use as specified in US law are included.

782:—only their particular expression or fixation merits such protection. On the other hand, the social usefulness of freely available information can weigh against the appropriateness of copyright for certain fixations. The 1270:

material because the filmmaker sought to use it in a critical way. Soon after the best practices statement was released, all errors and omissions insurers in the U.S. shifted to begin offering routine fair use coverage.

488:(2015) (the "dancing baby" case), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that fair use was not merely a defense to an infringement claim, but was an expressly authorized right, and an exception to the 3475: 899:

uses in general, if widespread, would harm the potential market of the original. The burden of proof here rests on the copyright owner, who must demonstrate the impact of the infringement on commercial use of the work.

4882: 4596: 3531: 1774:

not be replaced by the substantially wider 'fair use' concept". Since then, the Canadian fair dealing exception has broadened. It is now similar in effect to U.S. fair use, even though the frameworks are different.

1199:

that copyright holders cannot order a deletion of an online file without determining whether that posting reflected "fair use" of the copyrighted material. The case involved Stephanie Lenz, a writer and editor from

426:

In response to perceived over-expansion of copyrights, several electronic civil liberties and free expression organizations began in the 1990s to add fair use cases to their dockets and concerns. These include the

1190: 390:

established the doctrine of "fair abridgement", which permitted unauthorized abridgement of copyrighted works under certain circumstances. Over time, this doctrine evolved into the modern concepts of fair use and

1041:

Although fair use ostensibly permits certain uses without liability, many content creators and publishers try to avoid a potential court battle by seeking a legally unnecessary license from copyright owners for

4805: 4633: 1029:

Some copyright owners claim infringement even in circumstances where the fair use defense would likely succeed, in hopes that the user will refrain from the use rather than spending resources in their defense.

852:

The third factor assesses the amount and substantiality of the copyrighted work that has been used. In general, the less that is used in relation to the whole, the more likely the use will be considered fair.

1692:

Section 35 of the Singaporean Copyright Act 1987 has been amended in 2004 to allow a 'fair dealing' exception for any purpose. The four fair use factors similar to US law are included in the new section 35.

4817: 890:'s 200,000-word memoir was sufficient to make the third fair use factor weigh against the defendants, because the portion taken was the "heart of the work". This use was ultimately found not to be fair. 748:

photographs was fair use. The court held that Warhol's use was not transformative because Warhol merely imposed his own style on Goldsmith's photograph and retained the photograph's essential elements.

685:, the court clarified that this is not a "hard evidentiary presumption" and that even the tendency that commercial purpose will "weigh against a finding of fair use ... will vary with the context." The 3827: 1016:

case of infringement, and the defendant need not even raise the fair use defense. In addition, fair use is only one of many limitations, exceptions, and defenses to copyright infringement. Thus, a

3012: 1358:

dolls for his photography project "Food Chain Barbie" (depicting several copies of the doll naked and disheveled and about to be baked in an oven, blended in a food mixer, and the like),

1527:, in finding that the defendant's uses were transformative, stated that 'the search capabilities of the have already given rise to new methods of academic inquiry such as text mining." 729:

Another factor is whether the use fulfills any of the preamble purposes, also mentioned in the legislation above, as these have been interpreted as "illustrative" of transformative use.

1470: 3697: 471:, news reporting, research, and scholarship. Fair use provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor 3891: 2419: 1458: 1428: 1228: 3094: 1298: 1107:

entertainment industry. This prompted him to invoke the fair use doctrine, which permits limited use of copyrighted material to provide analysis and criticism of published works.

4306: 2607: 2602: 2582: 2289: 1410: 697:" was fair use, even though the parody was sold for profit. Thus, having a commercial purpose does not preclude a use from being found fair, even though it makes it less likely. 677: 1302:

changed practices and opinions overnight. Samples now had to be licensed, as long as they rose "to a level of legally cognizable appropriation." This left the door open for the

1058:

Fair use is decided on a case-by-case basis, on the entirety of circumstances. The same act done by different means or for a different purpose can gain or lose fair use status.

732:

In determining that Prince's appropriation art could constitute fair use and that many of his works were transformative fair uses of Cariou's photographs, the Second Circuit in

1618:(IIPA), a lobby group of U.S. copyright industry bodies, has objected to international adoption of U.S.-style fair use exceptions, alleging that such laws have a dependency on 1420: 1174: 869: 115: 3501: 675:

case also addressed the subfactor mentioned in the quotation above, "whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes." In an earlier case,

2799: 1684:

treats all cases in which private material was made public as a potential copyright infringement, where fair use can apply, but has to be proven by reasonable circumstances.

3759: 3535: 2851: 4268: 1265:

before the distributor will take on the film. Such insurance protects against errors and omissions made during the copyright clearance of material in the film. Before the

962:

One such factor is acknowledgement of the copyrighted source. Giving the name of the photographer or author may help, but it does not automatically make a use fair. While

1742: 5049: 1830: 1778: 310: 3794: 2393: 1607:

includes fair use provisions from Bangladesh, Israel, South Korea, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Uganda, and the United States. However, Paul Geller's 2009

1031: 998:

that the use was fair and not an infringement. Thus, fair use need not even be raised as a defense unless the plaintiff first shows (or the defendant concedes) a

2979: 2713: 3729: 1615: 923:

that "all are to be explored, and the results weighed together, in light of the purposes of copyright" has helped modulate this emphasis in interpretation.

700:

Likewise, the noncommercial purpose of a use makes it more likely to be found a fair use, but it does not make it a fair use automatically. For instance, in

3401: 2515: 1611:

says that while some other countries recognize similar exceptions to copyright, only the United States and Israel fully recognize the concept of fair use.

100: 3241: 3190: 2953: 1735: 2632: 1288:

in certain genres of music was accepted practice and the copyright considerations were viewed as largely irrelevant. The strict decision against rapper

645:, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when the purpose of the use is transformative, this makes the first factor more likely to favor fair use. Before the 876:

in online search results did not even weigh against fair use, "if the secondary user only copies as much as is necessary for his or her intended use".

3110: 2315: 1318: 1859: 1802:

for providing photocopy services to researchers. The Court unanimously held that the Law Society's practice fell within the bounds of fair dealing.

1322:

case, holding that artists must "get a license or do not sample". The Court later clarified that its opinion did not apply to fair use, but between

1116: 710:

content by the Free Republic website was not fair use, since it allowed the public to obtain material at no cost that they would otherwise pay for.

4395: 856:

Using most or all of a work does not bar a finding of fair use. It simply makes the third factor less favorable to the defendant. For instance, in

545:

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

376:

The 1710 Statute of Anne, an act of the Parliament of Great Britain, created copyright law to replace a system of private ordering enforced by the

5039: 4938: 2773: 1592: 1279: 415: 218: 4296: 3020: 2747: 1034:(SLAPP) cases that allege copyright infringement, patent infringement, defamation, or libel may come into conflict with the defendant's right to 2088: 363:

has issued several major decisions clarifying and reaffirming the fair use doctrine since the 1980s, the most recent being in the 2021 decision

4712: 4261: 4082: 1762: 3077: 2577: 2258: 1978: 1705:

was amended to include a fair use provision, Article 35–3, in 2012. The law outlines a four-factor test similar to that used under U.S. law:

1433: 1415: 882: 436: 176: 3895: 2931: 5044: 4194: 3042: 1651: 233: 135: 343:

claims certain limited uses that might otherwise be considered infringement. The U.S. "fair use doctrine" is generally broader than the "

4965: 4743: 4481: 4371: 3476:"US Government Threatening To Kill Free Trade With South Africa After Hollywood Complained It Was Adopting American Fair Use Principles" 1510: 400: 303: 1095: 722:

that despite the fact that it is a non-profit and did not sell the work, the service profited from its unauthorized publication of the

4518: 2451: 2284: 1915: 1811: 986: 787: 723: 587: 517: 509: 498: 404: 365: 860:

copying entire television programs for private viewing was upheld as fair use, at least when the copying is done for the purposes of

5003: 4933: 4254: 3509: 3301: 3221: 1876: 1635:

institution. The law sets up four factors, similar to the U.S. fair use factors (see above), for determining whether a use is fair.

1504:

has led many to form the view that such uses would be protected under fair use. This view was substantiated by the rulings of Judge

1038:, and that possibility has prompted some jurisdictions to pass anti-SLAPP legislation that raises the plaintiff's burdens and risk. 530:

the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

2803: 1362:

lost its copyright infringement lawsuit against him because his work effectively parodies Barbie and the values she represents. In

4130: 3771: 1308:

doctrine, for short or unrecognizable samples; such uses would not rise to the level of copyright infringement, because under the

4836: 4677: 4551: 4301: 3767: 1746: 1378: 1262: 1217: 641: 265: 90: 3154: 2457: 2437: 2429: 213: 1896:, who attended the Library Code of Best Practices Capstone Event and had originally purchased the domain name fairuseweek.org. 1026:

establishes that it is legal, using certain technologies, to make copies of audio recordings for non-commercial personal use.

2539: 2180: 1595:. Many countries have some reference to an exemption for educational use, though the extent of this exemption varies widely. 1167: 649:

decision, federal Judge Pierre Leval argued that transformativeness is central to the fair use analysis in his 1990 article,

432: 428: 296: 2826: 4707: 3656: 3360: 3331: 4682: 4426: 4383: 3262: 3134: 1935: 1312:

doctrine, "the law does not care about trifles." However, three years later, the Sixth Circuit effectively eliminated the

1195: 1091: 484: 20: 4419: 3892:"Computer and Communications Industry Association. "Fair Use Economy Represents One-Sixth of US GDP". September 12, 2007" 31: 4990: 4950: 4623: 4618: 4498: 3801: 3671: 1702: 926:

In evaluating the fourth factor, courts often consider two kinds of harm to the potential market for the original work.

832: 578:

supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy ...

440: 5034: 4906: 4697: 4613: 4561: 4556: 3733: 2899: 1795: 1519: 1135:, announced a similar defense. However, the Court in the case at bar rejected the idea that file-sharing is fair use. 702: 464: 2986: 4052: 3828:"Book Publishers Whine To USTR That It's Just Not Fair That Canada Recognizes Fair Dealing For Educational Purposes" 3402:"Richard Prince ordered to pay damages to photographers in copyright infringement lawsuits over Instagram portraits" 3168: 1949:, an additional law for educational and governmental institutions that provides some additional copyright exceptions 4985: 4768: 4687: 4581: 4571: 4535: 4451: 4291: 3383: 1645: 1453: 1145: 1102: 681:, the Supreme Court had stated that "every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively ... unfair." In 650: 4339: 3737: 447:" archive was established in 2002 as a coalition of several law school clinics and the EFF to document the use of 4702: 4672: 4640: 4503: 4351: 3945: 3702: 2106: 1006:

case of copyright infringement. If the work was not copyrightable, the term had expired, or the defendant's work

120: 4756: 1166:

was found not to be fair use. That decision was appealed and contested by Internet rights activists such as the

4923: 4901: 4872: 4846: 4790: 4780: 4657: 4528: 4491: 4461: 4414: 4346: 4318: 2717: 1239: 1023: 819: 766: 420: 331: 4751: 4366: 3198: 2957: 1182:

after Arriba Soft had experienced significant financial problems and failed to reach a negotiated settlement.

1094:

over the film's use of their footage, specifically footage of the firefighters discussing the collapse of the

4911: 4824: 4719: 4402: 4378: 4234: 3421: 455:" (FUP) to help artists, particularly filmmakers, fight lawsuits brought against them by large corporations. 5029: 4955: 4945: 4928: 4856: 4841: 4812: 4785: 4775: 4608: 4508: 4471: 4466: 4334: 3923: 2663:

Snow, Ned (2010). "Judges playing jury: constitutional conflicts in deciding fair use on summary judgment".

1787: 1769: 1750: 1201: 125: 95: 85: 4645: 4131:"Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the 'Betamax' Case and Its Predecessors" 3974: 2330: 4889: 4877: 4851: 4795: 4763: 4692: 4662: 4628: 4603: 4576: 4566: 4523: 4486: 4476: 4390: 4361: 4356: 4286: 4097: 1799: 1791: 779: 377: 340: 196: 4829: 4800: 4591: 3611: 1409:

A number of appellate decisions have recognized that a parody may be a protected fair use, including the

1233: 1162:, Arriba Soft's use of thumbnail pictures and inline linking from Kelly's website in Arriba Soft's image 4667: 4513: 3447: 2733: 2611: 2586: 2293: 1910: 995: 380:. The Statute of Anne did not provide for legal unauthorized use of material protected by copyright. In 356: 42: 1293: 50: 3442:

Geller, Paul. "International Copyright Law and Practice" (2009 ed.). Matthew Bender & Co Inc.

3046: 586:

The statutory fair use factors quoted above come from the Copyright Act of 1976, which is codified at

4960: 4456: 2092: 1940: 1783: 1677: 726:

because of "the attention, recognition, and contributions" it received in association with the work.

635: 536:

the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

4218: 2139: 1457:

but told the events from the point of view of the enslaved people rather than the slaveholders. The

4115: 4102: 3558: 1599: 1542: 1536: 981: 959:

As explained by Judge Leval, courts are permitted to include additional factors in their analysis.

717: 479: 186: 4026: 1598:

Sources differ on whether fair use is fully recognized by countries other than the United States.

1248:

did not even have the standing needed to sue Hoehn for copyright infringement in the first place.

972:

permission, while citing the original author, would be copyright infringement but not plagiarism.

4168: 4160: 2239: 2222: 1888: 1884: 1842: 1447: 594:. They were intended by Congress to restate, but not replace, the prior judge-made law. As Judge 360: 270: 4208: 1893: 80: 60: 5024: 4586: 3073: 2699: 2695: 2683: 2650: 2378:

Aufderheide, Patricia; Jaszi, Peter (2011). "Appendix D: Myths and Realities About Fair Use".

1974: 1550: 1546: 1442: 1205: 1163: 1035: 907: 387: 24: 2545: 1382:

the U.S. Supreme Court recognized parody as a potential fair use, even when done for profit.

4150: 4142: 4107: 3274: 2264: 2231: 1925: 1846: 1574: 1554: 1395: 1387: 1285: 1179: 1159: 733: 694: 452: 448: 181: 3583: 2876: 2614: 886:, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a news article's quotation of fewer than 400 words from 3460: 3148: 2362: 2356: 2082: 1930: 1524: 1364: 1213: 931: 848:

The Ninth Circuit has held that the use of thumbnails in image search engines is fair use.

805: 756: 655: 613: 595: 569: 555: 489: 444: 191: 3795:"Why Canada Should Not Adopt Fair Use: A Joint Submission to the Copyright Consultations" 3559:"Israeli Judge Permits Unlicensed Sports Event Streaming—FAPL v. Ploni (Guest Blog Post)" 1216:, the owner of the copyright to the song, ordered YouTube to remove the video under the 2589: 2296: 2031: 2001: 1570: 1155: 1124: 1120: 814: 778:

To prevent the private ownership of work that rightfully belongs in the public domain,

761: 382: 327: 238: 201: 130: 75: 4111: 3852: 5018: 4172: 3227: 1132: 861: 794:

magazine. Yet its copyright was not upheld, in the name of the public interest, when

783: 711: 664: 563:

The four factors of analysis for fair use set forth above derive from the opinion of

539:

the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

260: 155: 3918: 3116: 1123:

argued that file-sharing qualifies as fair use in his defense of alleged filesharer

764:'s letters was a key issue in the court's analysis of the second fair use factor in 4126: 1720: 1588: 1558: 1351: 1186: 1086: 1047:

the publication of a work in which a publisher has invested significant resources.

659:

is another example of a fair use case that focused on transformativeness. In 2006,

618: 564: 392: 344: 286: 255: 250: 223: 145: 105: 2037: 521: 2153: 1968: 591: 513: 502: 408: 1905: 1501: 1493: 1391: 1383: 1204:, who made a home video of her thirteen-month-old son dancing to Prince's song " 1128: 1001: 887: 844: 690: 245: 171: 140: 4213: 3431:. American University Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property. 2473: 1673: 1619: 1505: 1497: 1369: 1304: 1289: 1245: 1224: 1151: 1007: 991: 963: 914:

had either reduced their viewership or negatively impacted their business. In

660: 633:

A key consideration in later fair use cases is the extent to which the use is

472: 348: 3242:"The Authors Guild Loses (Again), and HathiTrust Wins–But What Does It Mean?" 2394:"If you publish Georgia's state laws, you'll get sued for copyright and lose" 802:

the reproduction of stills from the film in a history book on the subject in

3013:"Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Scholarly Research in Communication" 1946: 1920: 1838: 1622:

and long-term legal precedent that may not exist outside the United States.

943: 873: 396: 335: 206: 150: 70: 4246: 4237:, a compilation of national statutes that refer to fair use or fair dealing 1523:, a case derived from the same digitization project mentioned above. Judge 930:

First, courts consider whether the use in question acts as a direct market

414:

The term "fair use" originated in the United States. Although related, the

549: 4240: 2561: 1753:(PC) were with reference to strengthening Australia's "digital economy". 1492:

The transformative nature of computer based analytical processes such as

282: 65: 3384:"Artist Richard Prince Sells Instagram Photos That Aren't His For $ 90K" 4164: 2980:"Statement on the Fair Use of Images for Teaching, Research, and Study" 2243: 2054:

Iowa State Research Foundation, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies

1631: 1209: 911: 4243:, a repository of copyright educational resources for higher education 4155: 3949: 1881:

Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries

478:

The U.S. Supreme Court has traditionally characterized fair use as an

4180: 2774:"Lawyer: RIAA must pay back all "$ 100M+" it has allegedly collected" 2154:"17 U.S. Code § 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use" 1850: 1834: 1403: 1359: 1355: 1344: 1339: 1330:, practice had effectively shifted to eliminate unlicensed sampling. 799: 626: 468: 451:

letters. In 2006 Stanford University began an initiative called "The

110: 4146: 2235: 1883:. While the idea was not taken up nationally, Copyright Advisor at 1022:

case can be defeated without relying on fair use. For instance, the

3946:"Computer and Communications Industry Association. "CCIA Members."" 4228: 4004: 3633: 3532:"The Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. Ploni and others" 843: 755: 548: 423:

jurisdictions have other limitations and exceptions to copyright.

3361:"Copyright Case Over Richard Prince Instagram Show to Go Forward" 2932:"Documentary Filmmakers' Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use" 1158:, and fair use. In the lower District Court case on a motion for 3982: 4250: 4083:"Fair Use and Copyright Protection: A Price Theory Explanation" 3698:"Our copyright laws are holding us back, and there's a way out" 1858:. The study was conducted using a methodology developed by the 1267:

Documentary Filmmakers' Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use

395:. Fair use was a common-law (i.e. created by judges as a legal 1855: 1445:

estate unsuccessfully brought suit to halt the publication of

443:, numerous clinical programs at law schools, and others. The " 3302:"The story of Richard Prince and his $ 100,000 Instagram art" 2748:"Harvard prof tells judge that P2P filesharing is "fair use"" 3169:"A Closer Look at the Google Books Library Project Decision" 2474:"Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694 | Casetext Search + Citator" 1476:

Cases in which a satirical use was found to be fair include

1916:

1638:

On September 2, 2009, the Tel Aviv District court ruled in

1591:

instead of fair use, while others use different systems of

910:, failed to provide any empirical evidence that the use of 4179:

United States. Congress. House of Representatives (2014).

2091:, No. 4901 (C.C.D. Mass. 1841), archived from 1451:, which reused many of the characters and situations from 399:) doctrine in the U.S. until it was incorporated into the 30:

For fair use of copyrighted works on Knowledge (XXG), see

3730:"Productivity Commission Draft IP Report – the breakdown" 3070:

Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright

2380:

Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright

1970:

Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright

1237:

that the posting of an entire editorial article from the

2646:

Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services

2498: 2496: 2494: 347:" rights known in most countries that inherited English 3099:, 780 F. Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 1991). 2802:. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Archived from 2420:

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

2220:

Leval, Pierre N. (1990). "Toward a Fair Use Standard".

3095:

Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc.

1541:

There is a substantial body of fair use law regarding

1517:

Text and data mining was subject to further review in

1299:

Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc.

4231:, a database of fair use cases in U.S. federal courts 3859:. Government of the United Kingdom. November 18, 2014 3332:"Richard Prince defends reuse of others' photographs" 2603:

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

2418:

Judge Story's decision was reversed on appeal by the

1640:

The Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. Ploni

1010:, for instance, then the plaintiff cannot make out a 858:

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

678:

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

23:. For the broadband bandwidth management policy, see 1790:

case that establishes the bounds of fair dealing in

4978: 4865: 4742: 4735: 4544: 4444: 4327: 2956:. Association of Research Libraries. Archived from 2800:"Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al. v. Tannenbaum" 2422:, which did not consider the question of fair use. 1726:South Africa and the United Kingdom, among others. 994:on copyright infringement, the defendant bears the 663:used a photograph taken by commercial photographer 3917:McBride, Sarah; Thompson, Adam (August 1, 2007). 3894:. Ccianet.org. September 12, 2007. Archived from 2572: 2570: 2558:New Era Publications Int'l v. Henry Holt & Co 2425:Code Revision Comm'n v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 1833:(CCIA), a group representing companies including 825:New Era Publications Int'l v. Henry Holt & Co 716:Code Revision Commission and State of Georgia v. 3275:"Coders' Rights Project Reverse Engineering FAQ" 2852:"Righthaven v. Hoehn (District Court of Nevada)" 1831:Computer and Communications Industry Association 980:The U.S. Supreme Court described fair use as an 790:, for example, was purchased and copyrighted by 706:, the court found that the noncommercial use of 2468: 2466: 1973:. University of Chicago Press. pp. 10–11. 1779:CCH Canadian Ltd v. Law Society of Upper Canada 1707: 1150:provides and develops the relationship between 623: 575: 495: 467:include commentary, search engines, criticism, 3657:"Copyright Law In Singapore: A Brief Overview" 3354: 3352: 2985:. Visual Resources Association. Archived from 2730:Wall Data v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Dept 1032:Strategic lawsuit against public participation 872:held that copying an entire photo to use as a 780:facts and ideas are not protected by copyright 4262: 3011:The International Communication Association. 2373: 2371: 2309: 2307: 2305: 2279: 2277: 2275: 2273: 304: 8: 3068:Aufderheide, Patricia; Jaszi, Peter (2011). 2827:"Woman can sue over YouTube clip de-posting" 2040: (Court of Chancery (England) 1740). 1967:Aufderheide, Patricia; Jaszi, Peter (2011). 1745:(AUSFTA), while the most recent two, by the 1743:Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement 1616:International Intellectual Property Alliance 3919:"Google, Others Contest Copyright Warnings" 3886: 3884: 3882: 3880: 3878: 3876: 3874: 3415: 3413: 3411: 2516:Warner Bros. and J. K. Rowling v. RDR Books 1887:, launched the first ever Fair Use Week at 1115:In 2009, fair use appeared as a defense in 1017: 1011: 999: 508:Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 101:Integrated circuit layout design protection 4739: 4269: 4255: 4247: 4081:Depoorter, Ben; Parisi, Francesco (2002). 3672:"How will South Korea Implement fair use?" 3557:Lichtenstein, Yoram (September 21, 2009). 3325: 3323: 3130:Mattel Inc v. Walking Mountain Productions 1736:History of Fair Use proposals in Australia 1573:released an exhibit of photographs at the 311: 297: 38: 4154: 4101: 4090:International Review of Law and Economics 3111:Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films 3045:. Center for Social Media. Archived from 3043:"Success of Fair Use Consensus Documents" 2900:"A Pattern-Oriented Approach to Fair Use" 1482:Williams v. Columbia Broadcasting Systems 1319:Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films 3634:"Kiedy możemy korzystać z prawa cytatu?" 3591:World Intellectual Property Organization 3502:"Israel now has the right copyright law" 3072:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2215: 2213: 2211: 2209: 2076: 2074: 1860:World Intellectual Property Organization 1609:International Copyright Law and Practice 5050:United States intellectual property law 4025:Courtney, Kyle K. (February 24, 2014). 3793:Magazines Canada (September 15, 2009). 3760:"Reviews that have considered fair use" 2382:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2025: 2023: 2008:. Harvard Office of the General Counsel 1959: 1593:limitations and exceptions to copyright 1402:court also distinguished parodies from 1280:Legal issues surrounding music sampling 416:limitations and exceptions to copyright 219:Limitations and exceptions to copyright 163: 41: 3969: 3967: 3710:from the original on December 14, 2016 3456: 3445: 3167:Rosati, Eleonora (November 17, 2013). 3137: (9th Cir. December 29, 2003). 2934:. Center for Media & Social Impact 2635: (3d Cir. September 19, 2000). 2578:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises 2259:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises 2143:, 801 F.3d 1126, 1133 (9th Cir. 2015). 1763:Fair dealing in Canadian copyright law 1425:Mattel v. Walking Mountain Productions 883:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises 16:Concept in United States copyright law 3230: (S.D.N.Y. October 10, 2012). 2519:, 575 F. Supp. 2d 513 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 1434:Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co. 1416:Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 1090:series were served with a lawsuit by 1084:In April 2006, the filmmakers of the 437:National Coalition Against Censorship 177:Artificial intelligence and copyright 7: 4229:U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index 3422:"The Fair Use/Fair Dealing Handbook" 2954:"Code of Best Practices in Fair Use" 2505:, 714 F.3d 694, 707 (2d. Cir. 2013). 2365: (2d Cir. October 26, 2006). 2188:Journal of Intellectual Property Law 1652:Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. 1473:injunction against its publication. 1394:in 1989 for their use of Orbison's " 1073:Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc. 136:Supplementary protection certificate 3696:Martin, Peter (December 15, 2016). 3584:"Copyright (Amendment) Act of 2012" 3330:Gilbert, Laura (October 10, 2018). 3263:b:Reverse Engineering/Legal Aspects 2877:"Righthaven v. Hoehn (9th Circuit)" 2179:Patterson, L. Ray (April 1, 1998). 1537:Reverse engineering § Legality 1511:Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. 1170:, who argued that it was fair use. 904:Sony Corp v. Universal City Studios 603:1. Purpose and character of the use 533:the nature of the copyrighted work; 4051:Clobridge, Abby (March 10, 2015). 3655:George Hwang (December 19, 2017). 3474:Masnick, Mike (November 4, 2019). 3420:Band, Jonathan; Gerafi, Jonathan. 3017:Center for Media and Social Impact 2452:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 2432:, 1233 (11th Cir. 2018)., 2285:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 1812:Fair dealing in United Kingdom law 987:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 788:assassination of President Kennedy 724:Official Code of Georgia Annotated 553:Joseph Story wrote the opinion in 366:Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 355:when the U.S. Congress passed the 14: 5004:Category:Copyright law by country 3563:Technology and Marketing Law Blog 3500:Band, Jonathan (March 26, 2008). 3359:Chow, Andrew R. (July 20, 2017). 3222:Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust 3157: (2d Cir. April 2, 1992). 752:2. Nature of the copyrighted work 4435: 4302:International copyright treaties 3768:Australian Law Reform Commission 3300:Plaugic, Lizzie (May 30, 2015). 3240:Anderson, Rick (July 21, 2014). 2798:Engle, Eric (October 17, 2009). 2528:293 F. Supp. 130 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) 2181:"Folsom v. Marsh and Its Legacy" 2105:Netanei, Neil Weinstock (2011). 1747:Australian Law Reform Commission 1379:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc 1218:Digital Millennium Copyright Act 921:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc 866:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation 642:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc 266:Outline of intellectual property 91:Indigenous intellectual property 49: 32:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 19:For fair use trademark law, see 3736:. June 16, 2016. Archived from 3612:"Dz.U.2016.666 t.j. – prawo.pl" 2825:Egelko, Bob (August 21, 2008). 2772:Anderson, Nate (May 22, 2009). 2746:Anderson, Nate (May 18, 2009). 2160:. Cornell University Law School 1191:Northern District of California 1131:, defending alleged filesharer 942:market already existed for the 5040:Legal doctrines and principles 3826:Masnick, Mike (May 28, 2015). 3770:. June 4, 2013. Archived from 3279:Electronic Frontier Foundation 3119:, 398 (6th Cir. 2004). 2540:Salinger v. Random House, Inc. 2267: (2d Cir. 1985-05-20). 1630:In November 2007, the Israeli 1263:errors and omissions insurance 1175:Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 1168:Electronic Frontier Foundation 737:, 714 F.3d 694 (2d. Cir. 2013) 689:court held that hip-hop group 433:American Civil Liberties Union 429:Electronic Frontier Foundation 1: 4292:Copyright case law by country 4112:10.1016/S0144-8188(01)00071-0 4053:"Every Week Is Fair Use Week" 3948:. Ccianet.org. Archived from 3636:(in Polish). December 1, 2013 2628:Video Pipeline v. Buena Vista 2140:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 2056:, 621 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1980). 1936:Fair use (U.S. trademark law) 1469:was fair use and vacated the 1196:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 1143:A U.S. court case from 2003, 996:burden of raising and proving 485:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 21:Fair use (U.S. trademark law) 4297:Copyright lengths by country 4219:Resources in other libraries 4031:Copyright at Harvard Library 3382:Sola, Katie (May 27, 2015). 2898:Madison, Michael J. (2004). 2114:Lewis & Clark Law Review 1561:and access control systems. 1441:case, Suntrust Bank and the 1117:lawsuits against filesharing 1062:Fair use in particular areas 1008:borrowed only a small amount 840:3. Amount and substantiality 441:American Library Association 334:that permits limited use of 5045:United States copyright law 3734:Australian Digital Alliance 3191:"Google's Fair Use Victory" 2907:William and Mary Law Review 2158:Legal Information Institute 2038:3 Atk 143;26 ER 489 1829:On September 12, 2007, the 1796:Law Society of Upper Canada 1520:Authors Guild v. HathiTrust 1257:communications professors. 894:4. Effect upon work's value 703:L.A. Times v. Free Republic 611:In the 1841 copyright case 465:United States copyright law 214:Idea–expression distinction 5066: 4235:The Fair Use/Fair Handbook 2314:Samuelson, Pamela (2009). 2107:"Making Sense of Fair Use" 1809: 1760: 1733: 1718: 1646:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. 1534: 1277: 1208:" and posted the video on 1146:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. 1103:This Film Is Not Yet Rated 934:for the original work. In 760:The unpublished nature of 651:Toward a Fair Use Standard 29: 18: 4999: 4433: 4287:Copyright acts by country 4282: 4214:Resources in your library 3853:"Exceptions to copyright" 3703:The Sydney Morning Herald 3670:Ben (February 23, 2013). 3228:902 F.Supp.2d 445 2732:(9th Cir. May 17, 2006) ( 2688:Michigan State Law Review 2653: (6th Cir. 1996). 1582:Influence internationally 1338:Producers or creators of 4319:Rule of the shorter term 4277:Copyright law by country 2718:Audio Home Recording Act 2548: (2d Cir. 1987). 2002:"Copyright and Fair Use" 1252:Professional communities 1240:Las Vegas Review-Journal 1024:Audio Home Recording Act 820:Salinger v. Random House 813:In the decisions of the 767:Salinger v. Random House 463:Examples of fair use in 3924:The Wall Street Journal 3244:. the scholarly kitchen 2831:San Francisco Chronicle 2438:139 S. Ct. 2746 1788:Supreme Court of Canada 1770:Copyright Act of Canada 1751:Productivity Commission 1202:Gallitzin, Pennsylvania 1092:Jules and Gédéon Naudet 906:, the copyright owner, 693:'s parody of the song " 639:. In the 1994 decision 126:Plant genetic resources 96:Industrial design right 86:Geographical indication 4121:on September 14, 2006. 3455:Cite journal requires 2316:"Unbundling Fair Uses" 1800:copyright infringement 1792:Canadian copyright law 1712: 1676:and is covered by the 1292:'s appropriation of a 1185:In August 2008, Judge 1018: 1012: 1000: 976:Procedure and practice 946:of course-pack copies. 849: 771: 631: 584: 560: 547: 341:copyright infringement 197:Criticism of copyright 121:Plant breeders' rights 4027:"About Fair Use Week" 2682:Reid, Amanda (2019). 2665:U.C. Davis Law Review 2560:, 695 F. Supp. 1493 ( 2430:906 F.3d 1229 2089:9 F. Cas. 342 1911:Berne three-step test 1278:Further information: 1212:. Four months later, 893: 847: 829:droit moral d'artiste 759: 552: 459:U.S. fair use factors 401:Copyright Act of 1976 357:Copyright Act of 1976 43:Intellectual property 4708:United Arab Emirates 4005:"Fair Use Week 2015" 3985:on November 20, 2015 3774:on December 21, 2016 3740:on February 20, 2017 3201:on November 17, 2015 3155:960 F.2d 301 3135:353 F.3d 792 3117:383 F.3d 390 3023:on November 16, 2015 2960:on November 17, 2015 2714:USC October 17, 1008 2651:99 F.3d 1381 2633:342 F.3d 191 2458:510 U.S. 569 2363:467 F.3d 244 2265:723 F.2d 195 1703:Korean Copyright Act 1678:Polish copyright law 1569:In May 2015, artist 1488:Text and data mining 1223:In June 2011, Judge 1139:Internet publication 619:Justice Joseph Story 4135:Columbia Law Review 3659:. Asia Law Network. 3538:on January 14, 2010 3512:on January 28, 2012 3404:. January 26, 2024. 3388:The Huffington Post 2992:on January 17, 2016 2684:"Deciding Fair Use" 2546:811 F.2d 90 2336:on January 19, 2013 2066:Nimmer on Copyright 2050:Nimmer on Copyright 1680:articles 23 to 35. 1672:Fair use exists in 1600:American University 1543:reverse engineering 1531:Reverse engineering 1234:Righthaven v. Hoehn 990:This means that in 982:affirmative defense 718:Public.Resource.Org 714:similarly ruled in 480:affirmative defense 378:Stationers' Company 187:Copyright abolition 5035:Equitable defenses 4939:Russian Federation 4482:Dominican Republic 3506:The Jerusalem Post 2736:at Ninth Circuit). 2323:Fordham Law Review 2223:Harvard Law Review 1889:Harvard University 1885:Harvard University 1843:Oracle Corporation 1467:The Wind Done Gone 1454:Gone with the Wind 1448:The Wind Done Gone 1350:For example, when 1294:Gilbert O'Sullivan 1229:District of Nevada 1096:World Trade Center 955:Additional factors 850: 772: 561: 361:U.S. Supreme Court 279:Higher categories: 271:Outline of patents 5012: 5011: 4974: 4973: 4195:Library resources 4057:Information Today 3952:on March 31, 2008 3898:on April 15, 2008 3336:The Art Newspaper 3079:978-0-226-03228-3 3049:on April 14, 2013 2716:, amended by the 2460:, 584 (1994). 2052:§ 13.05, quoting 1980:978-0-226-03228-3 1555:network protocols 1547:computer software 1443:Margaret Mitchell 1296:song in the case 1080:Documentary films 1036:freedom of speech 916:Harper & Row, 708:Los Angeles Times 388:Court of Chancery 332:United States law 321: 320: 25:Fair Usage Policy 5057: 4920: 4898: 4886: 4833: 4821: 4809: 4772: 4760: 4740: 4728: 4716: 4654: 4637: 4600: 4532: 4495: 4439: 4438: 4423: 4411: 4399: 4387: 4375: 4343: 4271: 4264: 4257: 4248: 4176: 4158: 4141:(8): 1600–1657. 4127:Gordon, Wendy J. 4122: 4120: 4114:. Archived from 4105: 4087: 4068: 4067: 4065: 4063: 4048: 4042: 4041: 4039: 4037: 4022: 4016: 4015: 4013: 4011: 4001: 3995: 3994: 3992: 3990: 3981:. Archived from 3971: 3962: 3961: 3959: 3957: 3942: 3936: 3935: 3933: 3931: 3914: 3908: 3907: 3905: 3903: 3888: 3869: 3868: 3866: 3864: 3849: 3843: 3842: 3840: 3838: 3823: 3817: 3816: 3814: 3812: 3807:on April 3, 2016 3806: 3800:. Archived from 3799: 3790: 3784: 3783: 3781: 3779: 3756: 3750: 3749: 3747: 3745: 3726: 3720: 3719: 3717: 3715: 3693: 3687: 3686: 3684: 3682: 3667: 3661: 3660: 3652: 3646: 3645: 3643: 3641: 3630: 3624: 3623: 3621: 3619: 3608: 3602: 3601: 3599: 3597: 3588: 3580: 3574: 3573: 3571: 3569: 3554: 3548: 3547: 3545: 3543: 3534:. Archived from 3528: 3522: 3521: 3519: 3517: 3508:. Archived from 3497: 3491: 3490: 3488: 3486: 3471: 3465: 3464: 3458: 3453: 3451: 3443: 3439: 3433: 3432: 3426: 3417: 3406: 3405: 3398: 3392: 3391: 3379: 3373: 3372: 3370: 3368: 3363:. New York Times 3356: 3347: 3346: 3344: 3342: 3327: 3318: 3317: 3315: 3313: 3308:. Vox Media, Inc 3297: 3291: 3290: 3288: 3286: 3281:. August 6, 2008 3271: 3265: 3260: 3254: 3253: 3251: 3249: 3237: 3231: 3225: 3217: 3211: 3210: 3208: 3206: 3197:. Archived from 3187: 3181: 3180: 3178: 3176: 3164: 3158: 3152: 3144: 3138: 3132: 3126: 3120: 3114: 3106: 3100: 3098: 3090: 3084: 3083: 3065: 3059: 3058: 3056: 3054: 3039: 3033: 3032: 3030: 3028: 3019:. Archived from 3008: 3002: 3001: 2999: 2997: 2991: 2984: 2976: 2970: 2969: 2967: 2965: 2950: 2944: 2943: 2941: 2939: 2928: 2922: 2921: 2919: 2917: 2904: 2895: 2889: 2888: 2886: 2884: 2873: 2867: 2866: 2864: 2862: 2856: 2848: 2842: 2841: 2839: 2837: 2822: 2816: 2815: 2813: 2811: 2795: 2789: 2788: 2786: 2784: 2769: 2763: 2762: 2760: 2758: 2743: 2737: 2727: 2721: 2710: 2704: 2703: 2679: 2673: 2672: 2660: 2654: 2648: 2642: 2636: 2630: 2624: 2618: 2599: 2593: 2574: 2565: 2555: 2549: 2543: 2535: 2529: 2526: 2520: 2512: 2506: 2503:Cariou v. Prince 2500: 2489: 2488: 2486: 2484: 2470: 2461: 2455: 2447: 2441: 2427: 2416: 2410: 2409: 2407: 2405: 2400:. March 30, 2017 2390: 2384: 2383: 2375: 2366: 2360: 2352: 2346: 2345: 2343: 2341: 2335: 2329:. Archived from 2320: 2311: 2300: 2281: 2268: 2262: 2254: 2248: 2247: 2230:(5): 1105–1136. 2217: 2204: 2203: 2201: 2199: 2185: 2176: 2170: 2169: 2167: 2165: 2150: 2144: 2136: 2130: 2129: 2127: 2125: 2111: 2102: 2096: 2086: 2078: 2069: 2063: 2057: 2047: 2041: 2035: 2027: 2018: 2017: 2015: 2013: 1998: 1992: 1991: 1989: 1987: 1964: 1926:Creative Commons 1847:Sun Microsystems 1821:Policy arguments 1575:Gagosian Gallery 1471:district court's 1459:Eleventh Circuit 1396:Oh, Pretty Woman 1388:Acuff-Rose Music 1316:doctrine in the 1180:default judgment 1160:summary judgment 1021: 1015: 1005: 902:For example, in 735:Cariou v. Prince 695:Oh, Pretty Woman 490:exclusive rights 453:Fair Use Project 449:cease and desist 445:Chilling Effects 313: 306: 299: 182:Brand protection 116:Peasants' rights 53: 39: 5065: 5064: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5008: 4995: 4970: 4914: 4892: 4880: 4866:Other countries 4861: 4827: 4815: 4803: 4766: 4754: 4731: 4722: 4710: 4648: 4631: 4594: 4540: 4526: 4489: 4440: 4436: 4431: 4417: 4405: 4393: 4381: 4369: 4337: 4323: 4278: 4275: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4203: 4202: 4198: 4191: 4147:10.2307/1122296 4125: 4118: 4085: 4080: 4077: 4075:Further reading 4072: 4071: 4061: 4059: 4050: 4049: 4045: 4035: 4033: 4024: 4023: 4019: 4009: 4007: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3988: 3986: 3973: 3972: 3965: 3955: 3953: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3929: 3927: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3901: 3899: 3890: 3889: 3872: 3862: 3860: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3836: 3834: 3825: 3824: 3820: 3810: 3808: 3804: 3797: 3792: 3791: 3787: 3777: 3775: 3764:www.alrc.gov.au 3758: 3757: 3753: 3743: 3741: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3713: 3711: 3695: 3694: 3690: 3680: 3678: 3669: 3668: 3664: 3654: 3653: 3649: 3639: 3637: 3632: 3631: 3627: 3617: 3615: 3610: 3609: 3605: 3595: 3593: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3577: 3567: 3565: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3541: 3539: 3530: 3529: 3525: 3515: 3513: 3499: 3498: 3494: 3484: 3482: 3473: 3472: 3468: 3454: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3436: 3429:infojustice.org 3424: 3419: 3418: 3409: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3366: 3364: 3358: 3357: 3350: 3340: 3338: 3329: 3328: 3321: 3311: 3309: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3284: 3282: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3261: 3257: 3247: 3245: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3204: 3202: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3174: 3172: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3149:Rogers v. Koons 3146: 3145: 3141: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3108: 3107: 3103: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3080: 3067: 3066: 3062: 3052: 3050: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3026: 3024: 3010: 3009: 3005: 2995: 2993: 2989: 2982: 2978: 2977: 2973: 2963: 2961: 2952: 2951: 2947: 2937: 2935: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2915: 2913: 2902: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2882: 2880: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2860: 2858: 2857:. June 20, 2011 2854: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2835: 2833: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2809: 2807: 2806:on July 8, 2010 2797: 2796: 2792: 2782: 2780: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2756: 2754: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2728: 2724: 2711: 2707: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2662: 2661: 2657: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2600: 2596: 2575: 2568: 2556: 2552: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2527: 2523: 2513: 2509: 2501: 2492: 2482: 2480: 2472: 2471: 2464: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2423: 2417: 2413: 2403: 2401: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2377: 2376: 2369: 2357:Blanch v. Koons 2354: 2353: 2349: 2339: 2337: 2333: 2318: 2313: 2312: 2303: 2282: 2271: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2236:10.2307/1341457 2219: 2218: 2207: 2197: 2195: 2183: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2163: 2161: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2137: 2133: 2123: 2121: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2083:Folsom v. Marsh 2080: 2079: 2072: 2064: 2060: 2048: 2044: 2029: 2028: 2021: 2011: 2009: 2006:ogc.harvard.edu 2000: 1999: 1995: 1985: 1983: 1981: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1956: 1931:Derivative work 1902: 1872: 1823: 1814: 1808: 1765: 1759: 1749:(ALRC) and the 1738: 1732: 1723: 1717: 1699: 1690: 1670: 1661: 1628: 1604:infojustice.org 1584: 1567: 1539: 1533: 1490: 1478:Blanch v. Koons 1437:). In the 2001 1365:Rogers v. Koons 1336: 1282: 1276: 1254: 1214:Universal Music 1173:On appeal, the 1141: 1113: 1082: 1069: 1064: 978: 957: 896: 842: 754: 656:Blanch v. Koons 614:Folsom v. Marsh 605: 596:Pierre N. Leval 570:Folsom v. Marsh 556:Folsom v. Marsh 461: 374: 317: 281: 277: 192:Copyright troll 81:Farmers' rights 61:Authors' rights 35: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 5063: 5061: 5053: 5052: 5047: 5042: 5037: 5032: 5030:Digital rights 5027: 5017: 5016: 5010: 5009: 5007: 5006: 5000: 4997: 4996: 4994: 4993: 4988: 4982: 4980: 4976: 4975: 4972: 4971: 4969: 4968: 4966:United Kingdom 4963: 4958: 4953: 4948: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4936: 4926: 4921: 4909: 4904: 4899: 4887: 4875: 4869: 4867: 4863: 4862: 4860: 4859: 4854: 4849: 4844: 4839: 4834: 4822: 4810: 4798: 4793: 4788: 4783: 4778: 4773: 4761: 4748: 4746: 4744:European Union 4737: 4733: 4732: 4730: 4729: 4717: 4705: 4700: 4695: 4690: 4685: 4680: 4675: 4670: 4665: 4660: 4655: 4643: 4638: 4626: 4621: 4616: 4611: 4606: 4601: 4589: 4584: 4579: 4574: 4569: 4564: 4559: 4554: 4548: 4546: 4542: 4541: 4539: 4538: 4533: 4521: 4516: 4511: 4506: 4501: 4496: 4484: 4479: 4474: 4469: 4464: 4459: 4454: 4448: 4446: 4442: 4441: 4434: 4432: 4430: 4429: 4424: 4412: 4400: 4388: 4376: 4364: 4359: 4354: 4349: 4344: 4331: 4329: 4325: 4324: 4322: 4321: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4312:related rights 4309: 4299: 4294: 4289: 4283: 4280: 4279: 4276: 4274: 4273: 4266: 4259: 4251: 4245: 4244: 4238: 4232: 4222: 4221: 4216: 4211: 4205: 4204: 4193: 4192: 4190: 4189:External links 4187: 4186: 4185: 4177: 4123: 4103:10.1.1.196.423 4096:(4): 453–473. 4076: 4073: 4070: 4069: 4043: 4017: 3996: 3963: 3937: 3909: 3870: 3844: 3818: 3785: 3751: 3721: 3688: 3662: 3647: 3625: 3603: 3575: 3549: 3523: 3492: 3466: 3457:|journal= 3434: 3407: 3393: 3374: 3348: 3319: 3292: 3266: 3255: 3232: 3212: 3195:Law Down Under 3182: 3159: 3139: 3121: 3101: 3085: 3078: 3060: 3034: 3003: 2971: 2945: 2923: 2890: 2868: 2843: 2817: 2790: 2764: 2738: 2722: 2705: 2674: 2655: 2637: 2619: 2594: 2566: 2550: 2530: 2521: 2507: 2490: 2462: 2442: 2411: 2385: 2367: 2347: 2301: 2269: 2249: 2205: 2171: 2145: 2131: 2097: 2070: 2058: 2042: 2032:Gyles v Wilcox 2019: 1993: 1979: 1958: 1957: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1944: 1941:Scènes à faire 1938: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1913: 1908: 1901: 1898: 1871: 1868: 1822: 1819: 1810:Main article: 1807: 1806:United Kingdom 1804: 1786:is a landmark 1761:Main article: 1758: 1755: 1734:Main article: 1731: 1728: 1719:Main article: 1716: 1713: 1698: 1695: 1689: 1686: 1669: 1666: 1660: 1657: 1627: 1624: 1583: 1580: 1571:Richard Prince 1566: 1563: 1535:Main article: 1532: 1529: 1489: 1486: 1373:the use fair. 1335: 1332: 1275: 1274:Music sampling 1272: 1253: 1250: 1206:Let's Go Crazy 1156:inline linking 1140: 1137: 1125:Joel Tenenbaum 1121:Charles Nesson 1112: 1109: 1081: 1078: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 977: 974: 956: 953: 948: 947: 939: 895: 892: 888:President Ford 841: 838: 815:Second Circuit 762:J. D. Salinger 753: 750: 636:transformative 604: 601: 588:17 U.S.C. 543: 542: 541: 540: 537: 534: 531: 518:17 U.S.C. 510:17 U.S.C. 506: 505: 499:17 U.S.C. 460: 457: 405:17 U.S.C. 383:Gyles v Wilcox 373: 370: 319: 318: 316: 315: 308: 301: 293: 290: 289: 276: 275: 274: 273: 263: 258: 253: 248: 243: 242: 241: 239:Right to quote 236: 231: 226: 216: 211: 210: 209: 202:Bioprospecting 199: 194: 189: 184: 179: 174: 166: 165: 164:Related topics 161: 160: 159: 158: 153: 148: 143: 138: 133: 131:Related rights 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 76:Database right 73: 68: 63: 55: 54: 46: 45: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5062: 5051: 5048: 5046: 5043: 5041: 5038: 5036: 5033: 5031: 5028: 5026: 5023: 5022: 5020: 5005: 5002: 5001: 4998: 4992: 4989: 4987: 4984: 4983: 4981: 4977: 4967: 4964: 4962: 4959: 4957: 4954: 4952: 4949: 4947: 4944: 4940: 4937: 4935: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4927: 4925: 4922: 4918: 4913: 4910: 4908: 4905: 4903: 4900: 4896: 4891: 4888: 4884: 4879: 4876: 4874: 4871: 4870: 4868: 4864: 4858: 4855: 4853: 4850: 4848: 4845: 4843: 4840: 4838: 4835: 4831: 4826: 4823: 4819: 4814: 4811: 4807: 4802: 4799: 4797: 4794: 4792: 4789: 4787: 4784: 4782: 4779: 4777: 4774: 4770: 4765: 4762: 4758: 4753: 4750: 4749: 4747: 4745: 4741: 4738: 4734: 4726: 4721: 4718: 4714: 4709: 4706: 4704: 4701: 4699: 4696: 4694: 4691: 4689: 4686: 4684: 4681: 4679: 4676: 4674: 4671: 4669: 4666: 4664: 4661: 4659: 4656: 4652: 4647: 4644: 4642: 4639: 4635: 4630: 4627: 4625: 4622: 4620: 4617: 4615: 4612: 4610: 4607: 4605: 4602: 4598: 4593: 4590: 4588: 4585: 4583: 4580: 4578: 4575: 4573: 4570: 4568: 4565: 4563: 4560: 4558: 4555: 4553: 4550: 4549: 4547: 4543: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4525: 4522: 4520: 4519:United States 4517: 4515: 4512: 4510: 4507: 4505: 4502: 4500: 4497: 4493: 4488: 4485: 4483: 4480: 4478: 4475: 4473: 4470: 4468: 4465: 4463: 4460: 4458: 4455: 4453: 4450: 4449: 4447: 4443: 4428: 4425: 4421: 4416: 4413: 4409: 4404: 4401: 4397: 4392: 4389: 4385: 4380: 4377: 4373: 4368: 4365: 4363: 4360: 4358: 4355: 4353: 4350: 4348: 4345: 4341: 4336: 4333: 4332: 4330: 4326: 4320: 4317: 4313: 4310: 4308: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4300: 4298: 4295: 4293: 4290: 4288: 4285: 4284: 4281: 4272: 4267: 4265: 4260: 4258: 4253: 4252: 4249: 4242: 4239: 4236: 4233: 4230: 4227: 4226: 4220: 4217: 4215: 4212: 4210: 4207: 4206: 4201: 4196: 4188: 4183: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4157: 4152: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4128: 4124: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4104: 4099: 4095: 4091: 4084: 4079: 4078: 4074: 4058: 4054: 4047: 4044: 4032: 4028: 4021: 4018: 4006: 4000: 3997: 3984: 3980: 3979:Fair Use Week 3976: 3970: 3968: 3964: 3951: 3947: 3941: 3938: 3926: 3925: 3920: 3913: 3910: 3897: 3893: 3887: 3885: 3883: 3881: 3879: 3877: 3875: 3871: 3858: 3854: 3848: 3845: 3833: 3829: 3822: 3819: 3803: 3796: 3789: 3786: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3755: 3752: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3725: 3722: 3709: 3705: 3704: 3699: 3692: 3689: 3677: 3676:The 1709 Blog 3673: 3666: 3663: 3658: 3651: 3648: 3635: 3629: 3626: 3613: 3607: 3604: 3592: 3585: 3579: 3576: 3564: 3560: 3553: 3550: 3537: 3533: 3527: 3524: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3496: 3493: 3481: 3477: 3470: 3467: 3462: 3449: 3438: 3435: 3430: 3423: 3416: 3414: 3412: 3408: 3403: 3397: 3394: 3389: 3385: 3378: 3375: 3362: 3355: 3353: 3349: 3337: 3333: 3326: 3324: 3320: 3307: 3303: 3296: 3293: 3280: 3276: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3259: 3256: 3243: 3236: 3233: 3229: 3224: 3223: 3216: 3213: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3186: 3183: 3170: 3163: 3160: 3156: 3151: 3150: 3143: 3140: 3136: 3131: 3125: 3122: 3118: 3113: 3112: 3105: 3102: 3097: 3096: 3089: 3086: 3081: 3075: 3071: 3064: 3061: 3048: 3044: 3038: 3035: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3007: 3004: 2988: 2981: 2975: 2972: 2959: 2955: 2949: 2946: 2933: 2927: 2924: 2912: 2908: 2901: 2894: 2891: 2879:. May 9, 2013 2878: 2872: 2869: 2853: 2847: 2844: 2832: 2828: 2821: 2818: 2805: 2801: 2794: 2791: 2779: 2775: 2768: 2765: 2753: 2749: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2726: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2709: 2706: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2678: 2675: 2670: 2666: 2659: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2641: 2638: 2634: 2629: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2579: 2573: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2554: 2551: 2547: 2542: 2541: 2534: 2531: 2525: 2522: 2518: 2517: 2511: 2508: 2504: 2499: 2497: 2495: 2491: 2479: 2475: 2469: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2454: 2453: 2446: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2434:cert. granted 2431: 2426: 2421: 2415: 2412: 2399: 2395: 2389: 2386: 2381: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2351: 2348: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2317: 2310: 2308: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2280: 2278: 2276: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2261: 2260: 2253: 2250: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2216: 2214: 2212: 2210: 2206: 2193: 2189: 2182: 2175: 2172: 2159: 2155: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2135: 2132: 2119: 2115: 2108: 2101: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2084: 2077: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2033: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2007: 2003: 1997: 1994: 1982: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1963: 1960: 1953: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1939: 1937: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1897: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1870:Fair Use Week 1869: 1867: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1827: 1820: 1818: 1813: 1805: 1803: 1801: 1798:was sued for 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1782:1 S.C.R. 339, 1781: 1780: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1764: 1756: 1754: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1737: 1729: 1727: 1722: 1714: 1711: 1706: 1704: 1696: 1694: 1687: 1685: 1681: 1679: 1675: 1667: 1665: 1658: 1656: 1654: 1653: 1648: 1647: 1641: 1636: 1633: 1625: 1623: 1621: 1617: 1612: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1596: 1594: 1590: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1564: 1562: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1538: 1530: 1528: 1526: 1522: 1521: 1515: 1513: 1512: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1487: 1485: 1483: 1479: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1465:, found that 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1439:Suntrust Bank 1436: 1435: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1361: 1357: 1354:appropriated 1353: 1348: 1346: 1341: 1333: 1331: 1329: 1325: 1324:Grand Upright 1321: 1320: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1284:Before 1991, 1281: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1258: 1251: 1249: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1226: 1221: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1197: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1169: 1165: 1164:search engine 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1147: 1138: 1136: 1134: 1133:Jammie Thomas 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1088: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1067:Computer code 1066: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1039: 1037: 1033: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1014: 1009: 1004: 1003: 997: 993: 989: 988: 983: 975: 973: 970: 965: 960: 954: 952: 945: 940: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 924: 922: 917: 913: 909: 905: 900: 891: 889: 885: 884: 877: 875: 871: 870:Ninth Circuit 867: 863: 862:time-shifting 859: 854: 846: 839: 837: 834: 830: 826: 822: 821: 816: 811: 809: 807: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784:Zapruder film 781: 776: 769: 768: 763: 758: 751: 749: 745: 741: 738: 736: 730: 727: 725: 721: 719: 713: 712:Richard Story 709: 705: 704: 698: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 679: 674: 669: 666: 665:Andrea Blanch 662: 658: 657: 652: 648: 644: 643: 638: 637: 630: 628: 622: 620: 616: 615: 609: 602: 600: 597: 593: 589: 583: 579: 574: 572: 571: 566: 558: 557: 551: 546: 538: 535: 532: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 523: 519: 515: 511: 504: 500: 497: 496: 494: 491: 487: 486: 481: 476: 474: 470: 466: 458: 456: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 431:("EFF"), the 430: 424: 422: 417: 412: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 389: 385: 384: 379: 371: 369: 368: 367: 362: 358: 352: 350: 346: 342: 337: 333: 329: 325: 314: 309: 307: 302: 300: 295: 294: 292: 291: 288: 284: 280: 272: 269: 268: 267: 264: 262: 261:Public domain 259: 257: 254: 252: 249: 247: 244: 240: 237: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 221: 220: 217: 215: 212: 208: 205: 204: 203: 200: 198: 195: 193: 190: 188: 185: 183: 180: 178: 175: 173: 170: 169: 168: 167: 162: 157: 156:Utility model 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 57: 56: 52: 48: 47: 44: 40: 37: 33: 26: 22: 4683:Saudi Arabia 4427:South Africa 4209:Online books 4199: 4138: 4134: 4116:the original 4093: 4089: 4062:December 29, 4060:. Retrieved 4056: 4046: 4036:November 18, 4034:. Retrieved 4030: 4020: 4010:November 16, 4008:. Retrieved 3999: 3989:November 18, 3987:. Retrieved 3983:the original 3978: 3954:. Retrieved 3950:the original 3940: 3930:November 16, 3928:. Retrieved 3922: 3912: 3900:. Retrieved 3896:the original 3861:. Retrieved 3856: 3847: 3837:November 16, 3835:. Retrieved 3831: 3821: 3811:November 16, 3809:. Retrieved 3802:the original 3788: 3776:. Retrieved 3772:the original 3763: 3754: 3742:. Retrieved 3738:the original 3724: 3712:. Retrieved 3701: 3691: 3681:November 18, 3679:. Retrieved 3675: 3665: 3650: 3640:December 30, 3638:. Retrieved 3628: 3618:December 30, 3616:. Retrieved 3606: 3594:. Retrieved 3590: 3578: 3568:November 16, 3566:. Retrieved 3562: 3552: 3542:November 16, 3540:. Retrieved 3536:the original 3526: 3516:November 16, 3514:. Retrieved 3510:the original 3505: 3495: 3483:. Retrieved 3479: 3469: 3448:cite journal 3437: 3428: 3396: 3387: 3377: 3365:. Retrieved 3339:. Retrieved 3335: 3310:. Retrieved 3305: 3295: 3285:November 16, 3283:. Retrieved 3278: 3269: 3258: 3248:November 15, 3246:. Retrieved 3235: 3220: 3215: 3205:November 16, 3203:. Retrieved 3199:the original 3194: 3185: 3175:November 15, 3173:. Retrieved 3162: 3147: 3142: 3129: 3124: 3109: 3104: 3093: 3088: 3069: 3063: 3053:September 2, 3051:. Retrieved 3047:the original 3037: 3027:November 16, 3025:. Retrieved 3021:the original 3016: 3006: 2996:November 18, 2994:. Retrieved 2987:the original 2974: 2964:November 18, 2962:. Retrieved 2958:the original 2948: 2938:November 18, 2936:. Retrieved 2926: 2916:November 16, 2914:. Retrieved 2910: 2906: 2893: 2881:. Retrieved 2871: 2859:. Retrieved 2846: 2836:November 16, 2834:. Retrieved 2830: 2820: 2808:. Retrieved 2804:the original 2793: 2781:. Retrieved 2778:Ars Technica 2777: 2767: 2755:. Retrieved 2752:Ars Technica 2751: 2741: 2729: 2725: 2708: 2691: 2687: 2677: 2668: 2664: 2658: 2645: 2640: 2627: 2622: 2601: 2597: 2576: 2557: 2553: 2538: 2533: 2524: 2514: 2510: 2502: 2481:. Retrieved 2478:casetext.com 2477: 2450: 2445: 2440: (2019). 2433: 2424: 2414: 2402:. Retrieved 2398:Ars Technica 2397: 2388: 2379: 2355: 2350: 2340:November 18, 2338:. Retrieved 2331:the original 2326: 2322: 2283: 2257: 2252: 2227: 2221: 2196:. Retrieved 2194:(2): 431–452 2191: 2187: 2174: 2164:November 16, 2162:. Retrieved 2157: 2148: 2138: 2134: 2122:. Retrieved 2117: 2113: 2100: 2093:the original 2081: 2065: 2061: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2030: 2010:. Retrieved 2005: 1996: 1984:. Retrieved 1969: 1962: 1880: 1873: 1864: 1828: 1824: 1815: 1777: 1776: 1768: 1766: 1739: 1724: 1721:Fair dealing 1715:Fair dealing 1708: 1700: 1691: 1682: 1671: 1662: 1650: 1644: 1639: 1637: 1629: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1597: 1589:fair dealing 1585: 1568: 1565:Social media 1540: 1518: 1516: 1509: 1491: 1481: 1477: 1475: 1466: 1462: 1452: 1446: 1438: 1432: 1424: 1414: 1408: 1399: 1377: 1375: 1363: 1352:Tom Forsythe 1349: 1337: 1327: 1323: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1303: 1297: 1283: 1266: 1259: 1255: 1238: 1232: 1222: 1194: 1187:Jeremy Fogel 1184: 1172: 1144: 1142: 1114: 1111:File sharing 1101: 1100: 1087:Loose Change 1085: 1083: 1072: 1070: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1040: 1028: 985: 979: 968: 961: 958: 949: 935: 925: 920: 915: 903: 901: 897: 881: 878: 865: 857: 855: 851: 833:moral rights 828: 824: 818: 812: 806:Bernard Geis 804:Time Inc v. 803: 795: 791: 777: 773: 765: 746: 742: 734: 731: 728: 715: 707: 701: 699: 686: 682: 676: 672: 670: 654: 646: 640: 634: 632: 624: 612: 610: 606: 585: 580: 576: 568: 565:Joseph Story 562: 554: 544: 507: 483: 477: 462: 425: 413: 393:fair dealing 381: 375: 364: 353: 345:fair dealing 323: 322: 287:Property law 278: 256:Pirate Party 251:Patent troll 234:Paraphrasing 228: 224:Fair dealing 146:Trade secret 106:Moral rights 36: 4991:New Zealand 4951:Switzerland 4915: [ 4893: [ 4881: [ 4837:Netherlands 4828: [ 4816: [ 4804: [ 4767: [ 4755: [ 4723: [ 4711: [ 4678:Philippines 4649: [ 4632: [ 4624:South Korea 4619:North Korea 4595: [ 4552:Afghanistan 4527: [ 4499:El Salvador 4490: [ 4418: [ 4406: [ 4394: [ 4382: [ 4370: [ 4367:Ivory Coast 4338: [ 3714:February 6, 3614:(in Polish) 3596:October 21, 3485:November 4, 3171:. The IPKAT 2694:: 601–649. 2617: (1984) 2592: (1985) 2483:October 27, 2299: (1994) 1906:Abandonware 1784:2004 SCC 13 1697:South Korea 1525:Harold Baer 1502:data mining 1494:text mining 1461:, applying 1427:); and the 1392:2 Live Crew 1390:, had sued 1384:Roy Orbison 1129:Kiwi Camara 1019:prima facie 1013:prima facie 1002:prima facie 691:2 Live Crew 522:§ 106A 336:copyrighted 246:Orphan work 172:Abandonware 141:Trade dress 5019:Categories 4912:Kyrgyzstan 4907:Kazakhstan 4825:Luxembourg 4720:Uzbekistan 4698:Tajikistan 4614:Kazakhstan 4562:Bangladesh 4557:Azerbaijan 4403:Mozambique 4379:Madagascar 4307:by country 4156:2144/22971 2012:August 23, 1954:References 1894:Pia Hunter 1674:Polish law 1620:common law 1559:encryption 1506:Denny Chin 1498:web mining 1431:Circuits ( 1370:Jeff Koons 1328:Bridgeport 1314:de minimis 1310:de minimis 1305:de minimis 1290:Biz Markie 1246:Righthaven 1225:Philip Pro 1152:thumbnails 992:litigation 964:plagiarism 932:substitute 808:Associates 661:Jeff Koons 592:§ 107 514:§ 106 503:§ 107 409:§ 107 349:Common Law 4986:Australia 4813:Lithuania 4688:Sri Lanka 4582:Indonesia 4572:Hong Kong 4536:Venezuela 4452:Argentina 4173:151080880 4098:CiteSeerX 3863:April 16, 3832:Tech Dirt 3367:August 5, 3341:August 5, 3312:August 5, 3306:The Verge 2404:March 30, 2124:April 16, 1986:April 16, 1947:TEACH Act 1921:Copyfraud 1839:Microsoft 1730:Australia 1688:Singapore 1231:ruled in 1193:ruled in 944:licensing 908:Universal 874:thumbnail 798:tried to 482:, but in 421:Civil law 397:precedent 207:Biopiracy 151:Trademark 71:Copyright 5025:Fair use 4703:Thailand 4673:Pakistan 4646:Mongolia 4641:Malaysia 4504:Honduras 4445:Americas 4352:Cameroon 4200:Fair use 4129:(1982). 3956:June 16, 3902:June 16, 3778:March 8, 3744:March 7, 3708:Archived 3480:Techdirt 2883:April 2, 2861:April 2, 2810:June 16, 2783:June 16, 2757:June 16, 2615:417, 451 2562:S.D.N.Y. 2198:March 6, 2120:(3): 715 2068:§ 13.05. 1943:doctrine 1900:See also 1659:Malaysia 1551:hardware 1463:Campbell 1429:Eleventh 1400:Campbell 1340:parodies 1286:sampling 936:Campbell 687:Campbell 683:Campbell 673:Campbell 647:Campbell 328:doctrine 324:Fair use 283:Property 229:Fair use 66:Copyleft 4979:Oceania 4961:Ukraine 4924:Moldova 4902:Georgia 4890:Belarus 4878:Armenia 4873:Albania 4847:Romania 4791:Ireland 4781:Germany 4764:Belgium 4752:Austria 4658:Myanmar 4629:Lebanon 4524:Uruguay 4487:Ecuador 4462:Bolivia 4457:Bermuda 4415:Senegal 4391:Morocco 4347:Burundi 4165:1122296 3975:"About" 2700:3498352 2244:1341457 1632:Knesset 1419:); the 1227:of the 1210:YouTube 1189:of the 912:Betamax 823:and in 786:of the 621:wrote: 372:History 4956:Turkey 4946:Serbia 4929:Russia 4857:Sweden 4842:Poland 4801:Latvia 4786:Greece 4776:France 4736:Europe 4609:Jordan 4592:Israel 4509:Panama 4472:Canada 4467:Brazil 4328:Africa 4197:about 4171: 4163: 4100: 3857:Gov.UK 3226:, 3153:, 3133:, 3115:, 3076: 2698: 2671:: 483. 2649:, 2631:, 2606:, 2581:, 2544:, 2456:, 2428:, 2361:, 2288:, 2263:, 2242: 2087:, 2036:, 1977: 1851:Yahoo! 1841:Inc., 1837:Inc., 1835:Google 1794:. The 1757:Canada 1668:Poland 1626:Israel 1411:Second 1404:satire 1360:Mattel 1356:Barbie 1345:satire 1334:Parody 868:, the 800:enjoin 720:, Inc. 627:piracy 590: 520: 512: 501: 469:parody 439:, the 435:, the 407: 386:, the 359:. The 111:Patent 4919:] 4897:] 4885:] 4852:Spain 4832:] 4820:] 4808:] 4796:Italy 4771:] 4759:] 4727:] 4715:] 4693:Syria 4663:Nepal 4653:] 4636:] 4604:Japan 4599:] 4577:India 4567:China 4531:] 4494:] 4477:Chile 4422:] 4410:] 4398:] 4386:] 4374:] 4362:Egypt 4357:Ghana 4342:] 4335:Benin 4241:CHEER 4169:S2CID 4161:JSTOR 4119:(PDF) 4086:(PDF) 3805:(PDF) 3798:(PDF) 3587:(PDF) 3425:(PDF) 2990:(PDF) 2983:(PDF) 2903:(PDF) 2855:(PDF) 2610: 2585: 2564:1988) 2334:(PDF) 2319:(PDF) 2292: 2240:JSTOR 2184:(PDF) 2110:(PDF) 1421:Ninth 864:. In 608:new. 326:is a 4934:USSR 4668:Oman 4587:Iran 4545:Asia 4514:Peru 4182:2014 4064:2016 4038:2015 4012:2015 3991:2015 3958:2009 3932:2015 3904:2009 3865:2018 3839:2015 3813:2015 3780:2017 3746:2017 3716:2017 3683:2015 3642:2016 3620:2016 3598:2018 3570:2015 3544:2015 3518:2015 3487:2019 3461:help 3369:2019 3343:2019 3314:2019 3287:2015 3250:2014 3207:2015 3177:2014 3074:ISBN 3055:2013 3029:2015 2998:2015 2966:2015 2940:2015 2918:2015 2885:2016 2863:2016 2838:2015 2812:2009 2785:2009 2759:2009 2712:See 2696:SSRN 2692:2019 2612:U.S. 2587:U.S. 2485:2022 2406:2017 2342:2015 2294:U.S. 2200:2011 2166:2015 2126:2018 2014:2024 1988:2018 1975:ISBN 1767:The 1701:The 1649:and 1614:The 1500:and 1480:and 1386:'s, 1326:and 1071:The 796:Time 792:Time 671:The 516:and 473:test 285:and 4151:hdl 4143:doi 4108:doi 2734:PDF 2608:464 2590:539 2583:471 2297:569 2290:510 2232:doi 2228:103 1879:'s 1877:ARL 1856:GDP 1602:'s 1545:of 1508:in 1376:In 1044:any 984:in 969:not 817:in 567:in 330:in 5021:: 4917:ru 4895:ru 4883:ru 4830:de 4818:ru 4806:ru 4769:fr 4757:de 4725:ru 4713:de 4651:ru 4634:ru 4597:ru 4529:es 4492:es 4420:fr 4408:ru 4396:fr 4384:fr 4372:fr 4340:fr 4167:. 4159:. 4149:. 4139:82 4137:. 4133:. 4106:. 4094:21 4092:. 4088:. 4055:. 4029:. 3977:. 3966:^ 3921:. 3873:^ 3855:. 3830:. 3766:. 3762:. 3732:. 3706:. 3700:. 3674:. 3589:. 3561:. 3504:. 3478:. 3452:: 3450:}} 3446:{{ 3427:. 3410:^ 3386:. 3351:^ 3334:. 3322:^ 3304:. 3277:. 3193:. 3015:. 2911:45 2909:. 2905:. 2829:. 2776:. 2750:. 2690:. 2686:. 2669:44 2667:. 2569:^ 2493:^ 2476:. 2465:^ 2436:, 2396:. 2370:^ 2327:77 2325:. 2321:. 2304:^ 2272:^ 2238:. 2226:. 2208:^ 2190:. 2186:. 2156:. 2118:15 2116:. 2112:. 2073:^ 2022:^ 2004:. 1862:. 1849:, 1845:, 1655:. 1557:, 1553:, 1549:, 1496:, 1484:. 1368:, 1154:, 1127:. 1119:. 810:. 653:. 629:." 617:, 475:. 411:. 403:, 4270:e 4263:t 4256:v 4184:. 4175:. 4153:: 4145:: 4110:: 4066:. 4040:. 4014:. 3993:. 3960:. 3934:. 3906:. 3867:. 3841:. 3815:. 3782:. 3748:. 3718:. 3685:. 3644:. 3622:. 3600:. 3572:. 3546:. 3520:. 3489:. 3463:) 3459:( 3390:. 3371:. 3345:. 3316:. 3289:. 3252:. 3209:. 3179:. 3082:. 3057:. 3031:. 3000:. 2968:. 2942:. 2920:. 2887:. 2865:. 2840:. 2814:. 2787:. 2761:. 2720:. 2702:. 2487:. 2408:. 2344:. 2246:. 2234:: 2202:. 2192:5 2168:. 2128:. 2095:. 2016:. 1990:. 1423:( 1413:( 1148:, 831:( 770:. 559:. 312:e 305:t 298:v 34:. 27:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.