85:, the president of the assembly. Except one dissenting opinion, the majority of the court supported the dismissal on grounds of the doctrine of necessity. The verdict was considered a blow to democratic norms, which had ramifications in modern-day
163:
and hence not a fully independent country. It gave the decision based on technical grounds that the section of
Government of India Act of 1935 in question was not applied to this case because the governor general had not assent to it.
243:
151:
Muhammad Munir ruled in support of the
Governor General. The court suspended the decision of the High Court and held the Governor General, and not the Constituent Assembly, to be the
354:
121:
who enjoyed the confidence of the constituent assembly. Maulvi
Tamizuddin Khan, the President of the Constituent Assembly and a representative from
196:. But the Federal Court's verdict stripped Pakistan's parliamentary supremacy, even though Pakistan itself was an independent realm headed by the
344:
303:
264:
349:
106:
227:
94:
78:
189:
136:
74:
237:
204:. The doctrine of necessity was applied by successive Pakistani and Bangladeshi courts to validate the actions of
339:
148:
70:
232:
200:. The verdict paved way for the future judiciary to support unconstitutional and undemocratic actions, such as
185:
173:
82:
52:
114:
66:
222:
319:
118:
275:
299:
197:
126:
40:
333:
201:
117:
dissolved the
Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. Earlier, he dismissed Prime Minister
156:
48:
293:
188:
in
Pakistan, whereas Pakistan was already an independent dominion created by the
205:
152:
131:
122:
176:
who argued
Pakistan was indeed an independent country within the Commonwealth.
217:
90:
105:
160:
86:
139:. The federal government appealed in the country's apex Federal Court.
192:. The British parliament enjoyed parliamentary supremacy in its own
193:
159:
can only be given by the
Governor General as Pakistan was still a
104:
244:
Bangladesh
Italian Marble Works Ltd. v. Government of Bangladesh
109:
Maulvi
Tamizuddin Khan challenged the Governor General's actions
184:
Some believe, the verdict dealt a blow to the notion of
125:, challenged the Governor General's actions in the
36:
31:
23:
18:
295:Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan
93:, and led to the dismissal being described as a
62:Federation of Pakistan v. Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan
19:Federation of Pakistan v. Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan
172:A lone dissenting opinion was given by Justice
8:
81:. The dismissal was legally challenged by
15:
69:. The Federal Court of Pakistan (now the
298:. Oxford University Press. p. 86.
256:
129:, where the dissolution was ruled as
7:
228:1953 Pakistani constitutional coup
147:In 1955, the Federal Court led by
14:
79:Constituent Assembly of Pakistan
355:Supreme Court of Pakistan cases
65:(1955) was a court case of the
1:
320:"Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan Case"
345:Pakistani constitutional law
190:Indian Independence Act 1947
75:Governor General of Pakistan
371:
350:Constitution of Bangladesh
238:Constitution of Bangladesh
113:In 1954, Governor General
71:Supreme Court of Pakistan
27:Federal Court of Pakistan
265:"Constitutional History"
233:Constitution of Pakistan
155:. The court opined that
77:'s dismissal of the 1st
73:) ruled in favor of the
272:Punjab Judicial Academy
186:parliamentary supremacy
174:Alvin Robert Cornelius
110:
83:Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan
53:Alvin Robert Cornelius
108:
67:Dominion of Pakistan
292:Hamid Khan (2005).
223:Constitutional Coup
153:sovereign authority
95:constitutional coup
137:George Constantine
119:Khawaja Nazimuddin
111:
305:978-0-19-597975-6
281:on 29 March 2018.
198:Queen of Pakistan
135:by Chief Justice
58:
57:
362:
340:1955 in case law
324:
323:
316:
310:
309:
289:
283:
282:
280:
274:. Archived from
269:
261:
127:Sindh High Court
32:Court membership
16:
370:
369:
365:
364:
363:
361:
360:
359:
330:
329:
328:
327:
318:
317:
313:
306:
291:
290:
286:
278:
267:
263:
262:
258:
253:
214:
182:
170:
145:
115:Ghulam Muhammad
103:
51:
47:
45:
44:Mohammad Sharif
43:
12:
11:
5:
368:
366:
358:
357:
352:
347:
342:
332:
331:
326:
325:
311:
304:
284:
255:
254:
252:
249:
248:
247:
240:
235:
230:
225:
220:
213:
210:
202:military coups
181:
178:
169:
166:
144:
141:
102:
99:
56:
55:
41:Muhammad Munir
38:
37:Judges sitting
34:
33:
29:
28:
25:
21:
20:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
367:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
337:
335:
321:
315:
312:
307:
301:
297:
296:
288:
285:
277:
273:
266:
260:
257:
250:
246:
245:
241:
239:
236:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
219:
216:
215:
211:
209:
208:authorities.
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
179:
177:
175:
167:
165:
162:
158:
154:
150:
149:Chief Justice
142:
140:
138:
134:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
107:
100:
98:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
54:
50:
42:
39:
35:
30:
26:
22:
17:
314:
294:
287:
276:the original
271:
259:
242:
183:
180:Significance
171:
157:royal assent
146:
130:
112:
61:
60:
59:
49:A.S.M. Akram
46:S. A. Rehman
206:martial law
132:ultra vires
123:East Bengal
334:Categories
251:References
218:Dosso case
91:Bangladesh
143:Judgement
212:See also
161:dominion
87:Pakistan
168:Dissent
302:
279:(PDF)
268:(PDF)
194:realm
101:Facts
24:Court
300:ISBN
89:and
336::
270:.
97:.
322:.
308:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
