129:
why they thought they had the right person. He got arrested with this stuff and later was found guilty of the crimes. The photos in this article is definitely needed. There is again no way words alone would show what the pictures tell. Please leave the photo so it is usuable in the article. This is what 'fair use' is about. We can't find this photo just anywhere you know, it's really specific to his crimes. Thanks, --
110:. This image is of historical significance. There is no "Serial Killers Museum" where a person could go to take a free image of this kit. Arguing that it "could be adequately covered with text alone" is the weakest of all arguments for deletion of photos that carry historical significance. Following that reasoning, we could reasonably delete
128:
I have to agree with my other fellow editors about this. The photo is necessary for historical reasons. It is all of this gear that Bundy had in his possession that got him arrested to begin with. There is no way words alone can show why these items were damning to him. It shows his history of
91:
You're wrong. The image is clearly valuable, as it is a visual illustration of the reason for his initial arrest, the reason he was linked to the DaRonch and Kent cases, and his modus operandi. It is clearly irreplaceable--not "difficult", as you state, but impossible to find a free equivalent.
149:
I think this discussion above was either complete or needs completion. The image should not have been deleted with editors explaining why it's needed and one editor explaining why it should be deleted. Please discuss or return the image for use, thanks,
207:, having previously attempted to remove this photo only to have a discussion consensus form to keep it and an admin review to concur, proceeded without asking any other opinions to dramatically shrink the version posted to the
184:
This is a smaller, re-sized version of a prior image, Ted Bundy murder tools police photo.jpg. I assume that the larger image, now an orphaned fair use photo now that this smaller image has been substituted, will be deleted.
92:
And all I can say as to the contention that text is adequate is that if one takes that position then no images are necessary, ever, because anything can be described with text.
226:
I agree, please leave the image as it is now with Vidor's last revert, which is the consensus version. It looks good in the article now. Thank you, --
24:
User
Rockfang contends that this image is replaceable by a free equivalent. This is simply false. No free equivalent to this image exists.
18:
70:. Indeed, it may be difficult to find a free image that conveys the same information, but the second part of the deletion template
211:
article. The version she shrank, that of Jan. 27, 2010, was already reduced significantly from the prior, original version.
119:
51:
115:
79:
239:
163:
142:
55:
241:
220:
194:
165:
144:
123:
101:
83:
59:
33:
216:
190:
97:
29:
204:
75:
227:
151:
130:
212:
186:
107:
93:
25:
208:
67:
114:
photos in place on
Knowledge (XXG), free or fair use aside.
66:
A number of the items in the picture are already listed in
50:
example of an image where no free-use can be created.
19:File talk:Ted Bundy murder tools police photo.jpg
72:"could be adequately covered with text alone"
46:mistaken case of image tagging, as this is a
8:
17:Discussion about replaceability (from
7:
180:Re-sized version of previous image
14:
1:
195:03:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
166:15:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
145:12:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
124:00:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
102:00:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
84:20:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
60:13:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
34:12:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
258:
242:16:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
221:16:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
200:Yet more about this photo
42:- I feel this is a
74:I think applies.--
249:
237:
232:
161:
156:
140:
135:
257:
256:
252:
251:
250:
248:
247:
246:
233:
228:
202:
182:
157:
152:
136:
131:
22:
12:
11:
5:
255:
253:
245:
244:
201:
198:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
63:
62:
44:wasteful abuse
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
254:
243:
240:
238:
236:
231:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:User:Rockfang
199:
197:
196:
192:
188:
179:
167:
164:
162:
160:
155:
148:
147:
146:
143:
141:
139:
134:
127:
126:
125:
121:
117:
116:Wildhartlivie
113:
109:
106:I agree with
105:
104:
103:
99:
95:
90:
87:
86:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
64:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
38:
37:
36:
35:
31:
27:
20:
16:
234:
229:
203:
183:
158:
153:
137:
132:
111:
88:
71:
68:this section
47:
43:
39:
23:
209:Ted Bundy
76:Rockfang
230:Crohnie
154:Crohnie
133:Crohnie
52:Doc9871
213:Vidor
187:Vidor
108:Vidor
94:Vidor
89:Keep.
48:clear
26:Vidor
217:talk
191:talk
120:talk
98:talk
80:talk
56:talk
40:Keep
30:talk
235:Gal
159:Gal
138:Gal
112:all
219:)
193:)
150:--
122:)
100:)
82:)
58:)
32:)
215:(
189:(
118:(
96:(
78:(
54:(
28:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.