Knowledge (XXG)

Filing (law)

Source 📝

199:
copies returned to the filer as "file-conformed" or "conformed copy" rather than "filed". These stamps mean the duplicate copy appears to conform to the appearance of the original document, and in turn, a copy bearing such a stamp can be submitted with later filings as evidence of the earlier act of filing. But the "filed" stamp is reserved for the original document that goes into the court file, and will be seen outside that file only if one obtains a certified copy photocopied directly from the original document on file.
233:. This is convenient in that many courts can now accept filings at all hours, rather than only during regular business hours. Where e-filing is in effect, the filer is normally required to lodge a "courtesy copy" (that is, a conventional paper copy) at the chambers of the assigned judge by the next business day. The courtesy copy of the filing is merely used to decide the motion at issue and is discarded when no longer needed, since the electronic file is now the court's master copy of the case file. 156:
case for trial (that is, put the case on a list of cases awaiting the setting or "fixture" of trial dates) and lodge two copies of the pleadings with the court (along with other documents relevant to the planned trial). Even after they had been lodged (i.e., temporarily deposited) with the court, the pleadings were not filed immediately. Rather, one copy was for the personal use of the judge, while the other copy would be officially filed
22: 198:
Next, the court clerk then stamps both copies with a large stamp that indicates the name of the court and the date the document was filed, then keeps one copy for the court's files and returns one copy to the filer for the filer's own records. In certain jurisdictions, the clerk will stamp duplicate
95:
and the acceptance of the document by the clerk for placement into the official record. If a document is delivered to the clerk and is temporarily placed or deposited with the court (but is not accepted for filing), it is said to have been lodged with or received by the court (but not filed). Courts
190:
Filing traditionally has been performed by visiting a clerk at a filing window, paying a filing fee by cash, cheque, or credit card, and submitting the document to be filed in duplicate or even triplicate. For each document filed, the court clerk inspects the document to ensure compliance with the
155:
normally did not maintain comprehensive pretrial case files (beyond recording the issuance of a writ to initiate a legal proceeding). Instead, after service of a writ, the parties merely served their pleadings on each other, then at some point in time, one party would ask the court to set down the
202:
In courts that require triplicate submissions, the third copy is then taken (either by the clerk or by the filer) to the chambers or courtroom of the judge assigned to the case. The clerk then adds the document to the
478:
Professor Siegel points out that under this system, "it is possible ... for a case to come and go — such as by settlement — without the court having any record of the case at all."
320: 516:
In explaining the relative paucity of product liability litigation outside of the United States, Professor Reimann notes: "In the United States, it is cheap to file a lawsuit."
32: 542: 547: 128:
documents of legal importance exchanged between the parties must also be concurrently filed with the court, while in a permissive filing system,
488:
Reimann, Mathias (2003). "Liability for Defective Products at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century: Emergence of a Worldwide Standard".
160:
the trial together with the judgment to establish the court's permanent record of the issues that had been formally adjudicated at trial.
282:'s total assets, with the result that just to initiate a meritorious case, an already severely injured or damaged plaintiff may have to go 552: 532: 490: 132:
needs to be filed until the case reaches a point where direct judicial management is absolutely necessary (such as the brink of trial).
471: 410: 385: 66: 358: 435: 296: 136: 152: 48: 537: 218: 278:
Even when one seeks a waiver for grossly unfair fees, courts tend to waive only the amount in excess of the
191:
court's rules on how legal documents should be formatted, verifies that the filer has not been declared a
171:, which was modified in 1992 but still largely operates in its traditional form in certain lower courts. 324: 148: 244:
Generally, filing fees are controversial because some individuals believe that they impede access to
192: 144: 340: 507: 291: 467: 431: 406: 381: 286:. What some consider to be the inherent unfairness of this system as actually implemented in 179: 44: 463: 499: 168: 451: 261: 175: 140: 121: 204: 97: 147:
during the late 1400s to the late 1990s (that is, before the 1998 promulgation of the
526: 327: 252:
complain about fees all the time (for example, it costs $ 435 to file a complaint in
214:), the court clerk also assigns a new case number and opens a new file for the case. 163:
In the United States, a permissive filing system has persisted to the present in the
124:
systems, filing rules can be mandatory or permissive. In a mandatory filing system,
456: 139:
operate on a mandatory filing system (with minor exceptions for the most routine
354: 253: 109: 101: 88: 230: 164: 279: 257: 211: 283: 249: 217:
A newer phenomenon is electronic filing, in which lawyers simply upload
195:, and confirms that the case number and caption are for a valid case. 511: 287: 272: 245: 222: 226: 503: 430:(8th ed.). London: Pearson Professional Limited. p. 114. 210:
If the document is the first pleading filed in a case (usually the
92: 380:(24th ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. pp. 146–150. 405:(6th ed.). London: Blackstone Press Limited. p. 233. 105: 80: 15: 267:
Many legal systems have filing fees for complaints that are
104:
is filed before the appropriate deadline. Usually a filing
225:
maintained either by the court (for example, the U.S. has
207:
for the case as well as any related deadlines or events.
40: 455: 256:), the American system is considered to be quite 341:Overstock.Com, Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 462:(3rd ed.). St. Paul: West Group. pp.  29:The examples and perspective in this article 8: 271:to the amount sought. Thus, the greater the 143:exchanges). In contrast, from the reign of 371: 369: 367: 229:) or by a private commercial service like 174:Filing may also refer to submission of a 67:Learn how and when to remove this message 344:, 231 Cal. App. 4th 471, 487 n.8 (2014). 491:The American Journal of Comparative Law 309: 182:, with or without an accompanying fee. 426:O'Hare, John; Hill, Robert N. (1997). 87:is the delivery of a document to the 7: 275:sought, the higher the fee to file. 100:unless an appropriate memorandum or 14: 543:Civil procedure legal terminology 221:electronic documents to a secure 359:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 20: 548:Criminal law legal terminology 297:Republic of Austria v. Altmann 1: 378:Odgers on Civil Court Actions 137:United States federal courts 153:courts of England and Wales 43:, discuss the issue on the 569: 553:American legal terminology 533:Judicial legal terminology 108:is paid which is part of 376:Goulding, Simon (1996). 260:-friendly by experts on 219:Portable Document Format 401:Osborne, Craig (1998). 248:. Although American 149:Civil Procedure Rules 49:create a new article 41:improve this article 31:may not represent a 292:U.S. Supreme Court 193:vexatious litigant 96:will not consider 458:New York Practice 180:government agency 135:For example, the 77: 76: 69: 51:, as appropriate. 560: 517: 515: 485: 479: 477: 461: 452:Siegel, David D. 448: 442: 441: 428:Civil Litigation 423: 417: 416: 403:Civil Litigation 398: 392: 391: 373: 362: 351: 345: 337: 331: 317:Artuz v. Bennett 314: 72: 65: 61: 58: 52: 24: 23: 16: 568: 567: 563: 562: 561: 559: 558: 557: 538:Legal procedure 523: 522: 521: 520: 504:10.2307/3649130 487: 486: 482: 474: 450: 449: 445: 438: 425: 424: 420: 413: 400: 399: 395: 388: 375: 374: 365: 352: 348: 338: 334: 315: 311: 306: 262:comparative law 242: 236: 188: 122:civil procedure 118: 73: 62: 56: 53: 38: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 566: 564: 556: 555: 550: 545: 540: 535: 525: 524: 519: 518: 498:(4): 751–838. 480: 472: 443: 436: 418: 411: 393: 386: 363: 346: 332: 308: 307: 305: 302: 290:resulted in a 241: 238: 187: 186:Filing methods 184: 117: 116:Filing systems 114: 75: 74: 35:of the subject 33:worldwide view 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 565: 554: 551: 549: 546: 544: 541: 539: 536: 534: 531: 530: 528: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 492: 484: 481: 475: 473:9780314239334 469: 465: 460: 459: 453: 447: 444: 439: 433: 429: 422: 419: 414: 412:1-85431-784-9 408: 404: 397: 394: 389: 387:9780421513907 383: 379: 372: 370: 368: 364: 360: 356: 350: 347: 343: 342: 336: 333: 329: 326: 322: 318: 313: 310: 303: 301: 299: 298: 293: 289: 285: 281: 276: 274: 270: 265: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 239: 237: 234: 232: 228: 224: 220: 215: 213: 208: 206: 200: 196: 194: 185: 183: 181: 177: 172: 170: 166: 161: 159: 154: 151:), the trial 150: 146: 142: 138: 133: 131: 127: 123: 115: 113: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 71: 68: 60: 57:December 2010 50: 46: 42: 36: 34: 27: 18: 17: 495: 489: 483: 457: 446: 427: 421: 402: 396: 377: 355:Rule 5(d)(1) 349: 339: 335: 330: (2000). 316: 312: 295: 277: 269:proportional 268: 266: 243: 235: 216: 209: 201: 197: 189: 173: 162: 157: 134: 129: 125: 119: 84: 78: 63: 54: 30: 437:0752-000152 254:Los Angeles 240:Filing fees 110:court costs 527:Categories 304:References 294:decision, 231:LexisNexis 280:plaintiff 258:plaintiff 250:litigants 212:complaint 145:Edward IV 141:discovery 45:talk page 454:(1999). 300:(2004). 284:bankrupt 169:New York 39:You may 512:3649130 464:118-120 357:of the 288:Austria 273:damages 246:justice 223:website 130:nothing 98:motions 510:  470:  434:  409:  384:  227:CM/ECF 205:docket 85:filing 508:JSTOR 323: 178:to a 165:state 158:after 102:brief 93:court 91:of a 89:clerk 47:, or 468:ISBN 432:ISBN 407:ISBN 382:ISBN 353:See 325:U.S. 264:. 176:form 500:doi 321:531 167:of 126:all 120:In 106:fee 81:law 79:In 529:: 506:. 496:51 494:. 466:. 366:^ 319:, 112:. 83:, 514:. 502:: 476:. 440:. 415:. 390:. 361:. 328:4 70:) 64:( 59:) 55:( 37:.

Index

worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
law
clerk
court
motions
brief
fee
court costs
civil procedure
United States federal courts
discovery
Edward IV
Civil Procedure Rules
courts of England and Wales
state
New York
form
government agency
vexatious litigant
docket
complaint
Portable Document Format
website
CM/ECF
LexisNexis
justice

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.