1000:
of such a series would be the composition of water, which depends on the simultaneous composition of hydrogen and oxygen atoms, which in turn depend on the simultaneous composition of protons, neutrons, and electrons, etc. into deeper levels of the hierarchy of physical reality. This is contrasted with an accidentally ordered or linear series - parents causing their children to begin to exist, who in turn cause their children to begin to exist - in which one member in the series may continue to act even if whatever caused it has ceased to exist, and so there is seemingly no issue if this type of series regresses infinitely; the impossibility of the infinite regress in an essentially ordered causal series would suffice for at least some varieties of cosmological arguments. Further discussion on this point can be found under
401:
impossible. Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause, and the intermediate is the cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several, or only one. Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, nor any intermediate cause. But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false. Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.
584:, explained that, "where the light of the candle is dependent on the candle's continued existence, not only does a candle produce light in a room in the first instance, but its continued presence is necessary if the illumination is to continue. If it is removed, the light ceases. Again, a liquid receives its shape from the vessel in which it is contained; but were the pressure of the containing sides withdrawn, it would not retain its form for an instant." This form of the argument is far more difficult to separate from a purely first cause argument than is the example of the house's maintenance above, because here the first cause is insufficient without the candle's or vessel's continued existence.
976:, the character Demea states that even if the succession of causes is infinite, the whole chain still requires a cause. To explain this, suppose there exists a causal chain of infinite contingent beings. If one asks the question, "Why are there any contingent beings at all?", it does not help to be told that "There are contingent beings because other contingent beings caused them." That answer would just presuppose additional contingent beings. An adequate explanation of why some contingent beings exist would invoke a different sort of being, a necessary being that is
799:, i.e. that it does not solve the problem it was formulated to solve or that it assumes already in disguised form what it was supposed to explain. According to this position, we seek to explain one event in the present by citing an earlier event that caused it. But this explanation is incomplete unless we can come to understand why this earlier event occurred, which is itself explained by its own cause and so on. At each step, the occurrence of an event has to be assumed. So it fails to explain why anything at all occurs, why there is a chain of causes to begin with.
833:
of time, every possible event, including the final end of the universe, would already have occurred. He therefore states his argument in three points: firstly, everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence; secondly, the universe began to exist; so, thirdly, therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence. Craig argues in the
Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology that there cannot be an infinite regress of causes and thus there must be a first uncaused cause, even if one posits a plurality of causes of the universe. He argues
467:. Aquinas observed that, in nature, there were things with contingent existences. Since it is possible for such things not to exist, there must be some time at which these things did not in fact exist. Thus, according to Aquinas, there must have been a time when nothing existed. If this is so, there would exist nothing that could bring anything into existence. Contingent beings, therefore, are insufficient to account for the existence of contingent beings: there must exist a
179:
4263:
5294:
4253:
592:
the optic nerve into your brain. He summarised the purpose of the argument as "that if you don't buy into theistic metaphysics, you're undermining empirical science. The two grew up together historically and are culturally and philosophically inter-dependent ... If you say I just don't buy this causality principle – that's going to be a big big problem for empirical science." This
881:, only things which begin to exist require a cause. On the other hand, something that is without beginning has always existed and therefore does not require a cause. The Kalam and the Thomistic cosmological argument posit that there cannot be an actual infinite regress of causes, therefore there must be an uncaused first cause that is beginningless and does not require a cause.
646:, the influential Medieval Christian theologian, created a metaphysical argument for the existence of God. Though it was inspired by Aquinas' argument from motion, he, like other philosophers and theologians, believed that his statement for God's existence could be considered separate to Aquinas'. His explanation for God's existence is long, and can be summarised as follows:
917:) is devoted to establishing the attributes of this first cause, such as its uniqueness, perfection, and intelligence. Thus defenders of cosmological arguments would reply that while it is true that the cosmological argument only establishes a first cause, this is merely the first step which then allows for the demonstration of the other theistic attributes.
302:" (now understood as the daily rotation of the Earth). According to his theses, immaterial unmoved movers are eternal unchangeable beings that constantly think about thinking, but being immaterial, they are incapable of interacting with the cosmos and have no knowledge of what transpires therein. From an "aspiration or desire", the
367:). He argued that the fact of existence could not be inferred from or accounted for by the essence of existing things, and that form and matter by themselves could not originate and interact with the movement of the Universe or the progressive actualization of existing things. Thus, he reasoned that existence must be due to an
732:: an event occurred because it was caused by another event that occurred before it, which was itself caused by a previous event, and so on. For an infinite regress argument to be successful, it has to demonstrate not just that the theory in question entails an infinite regress but also that this regress is
938:
argues that causal loops are not logically, physically, or epistemically impossible: " the only possibly objectionable feature that all causal loops share is that coincidence is required to explain them". However, Andrew Loke argues that causal loop of the type that is supposed to avoid a first cause
832:
and the question "What is infinity minus infinity?" to illustrate the idea that the infinite is metaphysically, mathematically, and even conceptually impossible. Other reasons include the fact that it is impossible to count down from infinity, and that, had the universe existed for an infinite amount
526:
of all contingent facts. It can be thought about as the sum total of all contingent reality. Premise 3 then concludes that the BCCF has an explanation, as every contingency does (in virtue of the PSR). It follows that this explanation is non-contingent (i.e. necessary); no contingency can explain the
999:
causal series, each member cannot so much as act without the concurrent actualization or causation of more fundamental members of the series; thus an infinite hierarchical series would mean that the entire series is composed of members none of which can act of itself, which is impossible. An example
983:
Severinsen argues that there is an "infinite" and complex causal structure. White tried to introduce an argument "without appeal to the principle of sufficient reason and without denying the possibility of an infinite causal regress". A number of other arguments have been offered to demonstrate that
817:
or otherwise untrue. Critics often press that arguing for the first cause's exemption raises the question of why the first cause is indeed exempt, whereas defenders maintain that this question has been answered by the various arguments, emphasizing that none of the major cosmological arguments rests
591:
has stated a new variant on the cosmological argument. He says that to deny causation is to deny all empirical ideas – for example, if we know our own hand, we know it because of the chain of causes including light being reflected upon one's eyes, stimulating the retina and sending a message through
476:
Aquinas' argument from contingency may also be formulated like this: if each contingently existing being considers himself Bn, then, because he exists contingently, he depends for his existence on a prior being Bn-1. Now, Bn-1 likewise, if it is contingent, depends on Bn-2. Nevertheless, this series
322:
spheres are no different in kind from the prime mover, they merely suffer a dependency of relation to the prime mover. Correspondingly, the motions of the planets are subordinate to the motion inspired by the prime mover in the sphere of fixed stars. Aristotle's natural theology admitted no creation
488:
in 1714. "There can be found no fact that is true or existent, or any true proposition," he wrote, "without there being a sufficient reason for its being so and not otherwise, although we cannot know these reasons in most cases." He formulated the cosmological argument succinctly: "Why is there
400:
The second way is from the nature of the efficient cause. In the world of sense we find there is an order of efficient causes. There is no case known (neither is it, indeed, possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to itself, which is
531:
of the BCCF. Statement 5, which is either seen as a premise or a conclusion, infers that the necessary being which explains the totality of contingent facts is God. Several philosophers of religion, such as Joshua
Rasmussen and T. Ryan Byerly, have argued for the inference from (4) to (5).
1056:
argues that most of the classical philosophers' cosmological arguments for the existence of God do not depend on the Big Bang or whether the universe had a beginning. The question is not about what got things started, or how long they have been going, but rather what keeps them going.
477:
cannot go on until
Infinity. At a certain time, we will arrive at a B1, the First Being in existence, and since there is no "zeroth" Being or B0, B1 exists Necessarily, i.e. is not a contingent being. This was Aquinas' Third Way, under Question 2, Article 3 in the Summa Theologica
876:
is more valuable remains a matter of debate, with the general conclusion being that neither is prominent. Opponents of the argument tend to argue that it is unwise to draw conclusions from an extrapolation of causality beyond experience. Andrew Loke replies that, according to the
984:
an actual infinite regress cannot exist, viz. the argument for the impossibility of concrete actual infinities, the argument for the impossibility of traversing an actual infinite, the argument from the lack of capacity to begin to exist, and various arguments from paradoxes.
929:
arising where traveling backwards in time is deemed a possibility. A sufficiently powerful entity in such a world would have the capacity to travel backwards in time to a point before its own existence, and to then create itself, thereby initiating everything which
521:
stating that all contingently true sentences (i.e. contingent facts) have a sufficient explanation as to why they are the case. Premise 2 refers to what is known as the Big
Conjunctive Contingent Fact (abbreviated BCCF), and the BCCF is generally taken to be the
812:
One objection to the argument asks why a first cause is unique in that it does not require any causes. Proponents argue that the first cause is exempt from having a cause, as this is part of what it is to be the first cause, while opponents argue that this is
396:), and Maimonides to form one of the most influential versions of the cosmological argument. His conception of first cause was the idea that the Universe must be caused by something that is itself uncaused, which he claimed is that which we call God:
2588:
My intention is to show that a cosmological argument for God's existence (not that of a first cause simpliciter) can be constructed without appeal to the principle of sufficient reason and without denying the possibility of an infinite causal
908:
Defenders of the cosmological arguments also reply that theologians of note are aware of the need to additionally prove other attributes of the first cause beyond that one exists. One notable example of this is found in
Aquinas'
1036:. Then, the question "What was there before the Universe?" makes no sense; the concept of "before" becomes meaningless when considering a situation without time. This has been put forward by J. Richard Gott III,
378:, who claims to find a contradiction between the Greek pagan insistence on the eternity of the world and the Aristotelian rejection of the existence of any actual infinite". Referring to the argument as the "'
267:, which he believed lived beyond the sphere of the fixed stars, and explained why motion in the universe (which he believed was eternal) had continued for an infinite period of time. Aristotle argued the
492:
Leibniz's argument from contingency is one of the most popular cosmological arguments in philosophy of religion. It attempts to prove the existence of a necessary being and infer that this being is God.
596:
version of the argument therefore does not intend to prove God, but only to disprove objections involving science, and the idea that contemporary knowledge disproves the cosmological argument.
693:
is impossible, because it provokes unanswerable questions, like, in modern
English, "What is infinity minus infinity?" The second he states can be answered if the question is rephrased using
787:(albeit the possibility that it existed for eternity before the Big Bang is also not strictly excluded on physics grounds alone). But it can also be based on more abstract principles, like
728:
employs the regress in question to argue in support of a theory by showing that its alternative involves a vicious regress. The regress relevant for the cosmological argument is the
2228:
The
Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, Edited by William Lane Craig and J.P. Moreland, The Kalam Cosmological Argument by William Lane Craig and James D. Sinclair, pp.191-192
689:
Scotus deals immediately with two objections he can see: first, that there cannot be a first, and second, that the argument falls apart when 1) is questioned. He states that
905:. This is why the argument is often expanded to assert that at least some of these attributes are necessarily true, for instance in the modern Kalam argument given above.
736:. Once the viciousness of the regress of causes is established, the cosmological argument can proceed to its positive conclusion by holding that it is necessary to posit a
2516:
Severinsen, Morten (2001). "Principles Behind
Definitions of Diseases – a Criticism of the Principle of Disease Mechanism and the Development of a Pragmatic Alternative".
3179:
2827:
2550:
This implies that there is an "infinite" and complex causal structure behind each disease, and that the disease mechanism would have to encompass the whole structure.
828:, argues that the infinite is impossible, whichever perspective the viewer takes, and so there must always have been one unmoved thing to begin the universe. He uses
489:
something rather than nothing? The sufficient reason ... is found in a substance which ... is a necessary being bearing the reason for its existence within itself."
991:
series) one on the other, cannot regress to infinity, even if it may be possible for causal series which are extended backward through time (accidentally ordered or
5268:
980:
contingent. A response might suppose each individual is contingent but the infinite chain as a whole is not, or the whole infinite causal chain is its own cause.
411:, are not the entirety of Aquinas' demonstration that the Christian God exists. The Five Ways form only the beginning of Aquinas' Treatise on the Divine Nature.
2729:
987:
Other defenders of cosmological arguments such as Ed Feser argue that the type of series in which causes are hierarchically dependent (essentially ordered or
818:
on the premise that everything has a cause, and so the question does not address the actual premises of an argument and rests on a misunderstanding of them.
5316:
298:
intend a theological correspondence between the prime mover and a deity; functionally, however, he provided an explanation for the apparent motion of the "
4226:
4237:
2186:
791:(parsimony), which posits that we should avoid ontological extravagance by not multiplying entities without necessity. A third option is to see the
783:. Such an argument can be based on empirical observation, e.g. that, to the best of our knowledge, our universe had a beginning in the form of the
570:, the process of becoming, is similar to building a house. Once it is built, the builder walks away, and it stands on its own accord; compare the
456:
exist in order for anything else to exist). In other words, even if the
Universe has always existed, it still owes its continuing existence to an
829:
1334:
3220:
889:
According to this objection, the basic cosmological argument merely establishes that a first cause exists, not that it has the attributes of a
371:
that necessitates, imparts, gives, or adds existence to an essence. To do so, the cause must coexist with its effect and be an existing thing.
2484:
333:, a third-century Platonist, taught that the One transcendent absolute caused the universe to exist simply as a consequence of its existence (
1813:
1675:
972:
2305:
2155:
4701:
4676:
2820:
463:
Aquinas's argument from contingency allows for the possibility of a
Universe that has no beginning in time. It is a form of argument from
4996:
2797:
94:
The basic premises of all of these arguments involve the concept of causation. The conclusion of these arguments is that there exists a
4952:
4299:
3112:
2767:
2634:
1386:
1314:
1249:
1048:. However, some cosmologists and physicists attempt to investigate causes for the Big Bang, using such scenarios as the collision of
934:
it. The usual reason given to refute the possibility of a causal loop is that it requires that the loop as a whole be its own cause.
4864:
3639:
2196:
1278:
382:' cosmological argument", Duncan asserts that it "received its fullest articulation at the hands of Muslim and Jewish exponents of
635:
and says that this cause must be uncaused, beginningless, changeless, timeless, spaceless, extraordinarily powerful, and personal.
1618:
Aquinas was an ardent student of Aristotle's works, a significant number of which had only recently been translated into Latin by
5326:
5192:
4516:
3036:
5331:
4922:
4266:
3924:
3837:
2813:
5260:
2685:
1690:
Quoted from The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument, by Alexander R. Pruss, pp.25-6
518:
485:
127:
2382:
473:
being whose non-existence is an impossibility, and from which the existence of all contingent beings is ultimately derived.
1477:
1016:, argue that a challenge to the cosmological argument is the nature of time: "One finds that time just disappears from the
5057:
5052:
4791:
4216:
4049:
3842:
3701:
3552:
448:
exist (contingency), its existence must have a cause – not merely another contingent thing, but something that exists by
77:. Whichever term is employed, there are two basic variants of the argument, each with subtle yet important distinctions:
4991:
4191:
1829:
2604:(Cham: Springer Nature, 2017), chapters 2 and 3; Waters, Ben. 2013. "Methuselah's Diary and the Finitude of the Past".
1017:
5175:
3603:
3560:
3090:
3080:
878:
825:
605:
1569:
2733:
5240:
4511:
3565:
3230:
3195:
2991:
951:
291:
5142:
3784:
3245:
1763:
868:
708:
5273:
5222:
5067:
4706:
3902:
3832:
3653:
3418:
3347:
3342:
3041:
1402:
1166:
433:
5152:
2213:
1843:
122:
during the 9th to 12th centuries, and was re-introduced to medieval Christian theology in the 13th century by
767:. But it is difficult to see where this contradiction lies unless an additional assumption is accepted: that
5207:
5011:
4908:
4427:
4099:
3814:
3754:
3746:
3443:
3438:
3225:
3210:
3075:
2681:
2269:
1037:
311:
255:
147:
220:
was "imparted motion". This required a "self-originated motion" to set it in motion and to maintain it. In
4957:
4292:
3696:
3515:
3132:
3127:
2836:
926:
99:
42:
720:
principle that determines how each entity in the series depends on or is produced by its predecessor. An
5097:
5001:
4771:
4734:
4686:
4574:
4231:
4186:
4124:
4114:
3453:
3317:
3162:
3152:
3137:
1501:
548:
393:
85:
962:
If the existence of every member of a set is explained, the existence of that set is thereby explained.
374:
Steven Duncan writes that it "was first formulated by a Greek-speaking Syriac Christian neo-Platonist,
5117:
4766:
4221:
3864:
3666:
3598:
3541:
3525:
3510:
3490:
3448:
3322:
3167:
3157:
3142:
3107:
3102:
3070:
1734:
1700:
1349:
859:
574:. (It may require occasional maintenance, but that is beyond the scope of the first cause argument.)
392:(c. 1225–1274) adapted and enhanced the argument he found in his reading of Aristotle, Avicenna (the
272:
195:
837:
may be employed to remove unneeded further causes of the universe to leave a single uncaused cause.
5212:
4843:
4781:
4691:
4628:
4538:
4526:
4206:
3907:
3779:
3658:
3327:
3250:
3240:
3117:
3001:
2996:
2698:
2492:
1619:
1075:
1049:
1001:
931:
873:
851:
724:
is an argument against a theory based on the fact that this theory leads to an infinite regress. A
580:(essence) is more akin to the light from a candle or the liquid in a vessel. George Hayward Joyce,
523:
464:
386:("the use of reason by believers to justify the basic metaphysical presuppositions of the faith").
249:
5293:
4252:
1672:
1233:
5321:
5197:
5160:
5127:
5122:
5087:
5044:
4932:
4903:
4823:
4786:
4321:
4196:
4154:
4064:
4029:
3769:
3671:
3613:
3575:
3570:
3406:
3396:
3172:
3122:
2913:
2873:
2703:
2579:
2541:
2465:
2415:
2309:
2163:
2136:
2097:
2053:
2034:
1823:
1294:
1086:
846:
821:
771:
is impossible. But this position is opposed to infinity in general, not just specifically to the
614:
610:
571:
222:
151:
139:
115:
3959:
3912:
3804:
3200:
2218:. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
210:(c. 384–322 BC) both posited first cause arguments, though each had certain notable caveats. In
697:, meaning that the first statement is instead "It is possible that something can be produced."
5250:
4883:
4828:
4818:
4810:
4776:
4661:
4610:
4432:
4285:
4256:
4134:
4119:
3992:
3789:
3759:
3736:
3716:
3618:
3608:
3535:
3364:
3354:
3147:
2935:
2855:
2763:
2630:
2533:
2192:
1809:
1459:
1382:
1310:
1274:
1245:
1229:
1161:
1091:
1068:
788:
481:
319:
303:
226:, Plato posited a "demiurge" of supreme wisdom and intelligence as the creator of the Cosmos.
131:
1044:, who said that asking what occurred before the Big Bang is like asking what is north of the
61:
or some totality of objects. A cosmological argument can also sometimes be referred to as an
5102:
4962:
4914:
4833:
4651:
4159:
4022:
3982:
3977:
3874:
3859:
3505:
3401:
3235:
3055:
3026:
2965:
2903:
2788:
2689:
2571:
2525:
2457:
2407:
2156:"Cosmological Argument: Does the Universe Require a First Cause? | Agnosticism/Atheism"
2128:
2089:
2026:
1984:
1924:
1661:
1041:
967:
834:
814:
733:
690:
581:
407:
264:
119:
38:
2188:
The Creative Retrieval of Saint Thomas Aquinas: Essays in Thomistic Philosophy, New and Old
1203:
178:
5297:
5202:
5132:
4888:
4838:
4656:
4543:
4166:
4149:
4104:
4094:
4039:
4012:
3949:
3944:
3929:
3854:
3590:
3580:
3215:
3205:
3006:
2883:
2792:
2677:
1679:
1573:
1374:
1116:
1106:
1021:
955:
902:
768:
494:
375:
324:
167:
2350:
279:
first cause – an idea he considered a nonsensical flaw in the reasoning of the atomists.
57:, explanation, change, motion, contingency, dependency, or finitude with respect to the
5062:
4729:
4553:
4548:
4521:
4390:
4139:
4129:
4069:
4017:
3954:
3849:
3774:
3731:
3711:
3500:
3376:
3337:
3031:
3021:
3016:
2940:
2294:
Andrew Loke, God and Ultimate Origins (Cham: Springer Nature, 2017), p. 189; Chapter 5.
1873:
1302:
1270:
935:
389:
123:
5310:
4972:
4873:
4465:
4370:
4109:
4034:
3917:
3897:
3809:
3764:
2975:
2583:
2469:
2419:
2247:
2038:
1176:
1101:
1013:
764:
457:
441:
425:
234:
163:
135:
2545:
2101:
1644:
1519:
17:
5187:
5092:
5082:
4982:
4947:
4927:
4868:
4796:
4681:
4584:
4531:
4054:
4044:
4007:
3997:
3987:
3879:
3794:
3726:
3623:
3287:
3011:
2960:
2755:
2651:
2622:
1589:
1330:
1146:
1053:
954:
have invoked a similar principle in their criticisms of the cosmological argument.
588:
155:
111:
1669:
1567:
An Examination of Thomas Aquinas' Cosmological Arguments as found in the Five Ways
2093:
5165:
5077:
5006:
4942:
4898:
4716:
4671:
4624:
4558:
4402:
4365:
4074:
4059:
3939:
3934:
3480:
3413:
3332:
3297:
3277:
2945:
1171:
1121:
1111:
995:
series) to regress infinitely. The rationale for this is that in a hierarchical
898:
894:
737:
694:
643:
341:
299:
276:
159:
95:
233:
the idea of a first cause, often confused with the idea of a "prime mover" or "
5230:
5137:
5112:
5072:
4666:
4437:
4422:
4417:
4385:
4360:
4002:
3799:
3721:
3706:
3495:
3465:
3428:
3386:
3381:
3312:
2950:
2529:
2030:
1928:
1717:
1237:
1141:
1126:
1045:
947:
855:
287:
143:
1778:
1463:
1451:
4893:
4724:
4615:
4412:
4397:
4380:
4375:
4355:
4144:
3869:
3691:
3520:
3485:
3470:
3433:
2850:
2448:
Calvert, Brian (1983). "Another problem about Part IX of Hume's Dialogues".
2074:
1156:
1151:
1096:
1025:
939:
suffers from the problem of vicious circularity and thus it would not work.
863:
841:
717:
437:
368:
360:
207:
186:
107:
54:
50:
2537:
705:
Depending on its formulation, the cosmological argument is an example of a
1566:
5245:
4878:
4460:
4407:
4308:
4211:
4201:
3686:
3681:
3676:
3628:
3475:
3391:
3359:
3272:
3264:
2955:
2930:
2898:
2893:
2805:
1081:
890:
784:
344:
330:
212:
58:
2707:
2693:
2332:
5235:
4937:
4848:
4696:
4643:
4579:
4473:
3460:
3371:
3292:
3282:
2925:
2878:
2575:
2461:
2411:
2140:
1136:
613:, who was principally responsible for re-popularizing this argument in
554:
444:. Since the Universe could, under different circumstances, conceivably
429:
352:
338:
268:
190:
78:
337:). His disciple Proclus stated "The One is God". Centuries later, the
5183:
4746:
4333:
3530:
3423:
3302:
2866:
1958:
1844:"Authors/Duns Scotus/Ordinatio/Ordinatio I/D2/Q2B - The Logic Museum"
970:
providing a proper explanation is fallacious. Furthermore, in Hume's
460:, Aquinas further said: "... and this we understand to be God."
283:
217:
2132:
2116:
2014:
1957:
Huemer, Michael (2016). "13. Assessing Infinite Regress Arguments".
1912:
504:
There is a contingent fact that includes all other contingent facts.
2058:
1895:
294:"). In what he called "first philosophy" or metaphysics, Aristotle
4739:
4589:
4480:
4455:
4350:
3307:
2860:
1131:
1029:
405:
Importantly, Aquinas' Five Ways, given the second question of his
379:
348:
203:
182:
177:
2212:
Reichenbach, Bruce (September 24, 2019). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).
1894:
Maurin, Anna-Sofia (2007). "Infinite Regress - Virtue or Vice?".
327:, but maintained a defense against dangerous charges of impiety.
4967:
4750:
4620:
2888:
2351:
No End in Sight: Causal Loops in Philosophy, Physics and Fiction
1033:
469:
449:
5032:
4319:
4281:
2809:
2052:
Veklych, Bogdan (2023). "Is a Quantum Gravity Era Necessary?".
1452:"Review of: Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals"
216:(Book X), Plato posited that all movement in the world and the
5107:
4594:
4494:
2970:
2489:
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
1764:"Online Training | Southern Baptists of Texas Convention"
103:
46:
1578:
Quodlibet Online Journal of Christian Theology and Philosophy
1478:"Author and Citation Information for "Cosmological Argument""
238:
4277:
2562:
White, David E. (1979). "An argument for God's existence".
2398:
White, David E. (1979). "An argument for God's existence".
1645:"SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: The existence of God (Prima Pars, Q. 2)"
1348:(2). University of Illinois Press: 193–211. Archived from
442:
there must be something to explain why the Universe exists
263:
of the idea of several unmoved movers, one powering each
2383:
The Hume-Edwards Principle and the Cosmological Argument
1779:"The Existence of God and the Beginning of the Universe"
2730:"Brane-Storm | Challenges Part of Big Bang Theory"
1545:
Analytic philosophy of religion: its history since 1955
966:
Nevertheless, David White argues that the notion of an
310:
that purely intellectual activity as best they can, by
1808:. UK, Croydon, CR0 4YY: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 194.
621:
Whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence.
126:. The cosmological argument is closely related to the
1433:"Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God", in
1232:(September 1, 2007). "The Cosmological Argument". In
659:
Not by itself, because an effect never causes itself.
627:
Therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence.
45:, is an argument which asserts that the existence of
679:. The ascending series is either infinite or finite.
653:
It is produced by itself, by nothing, or by another.
546:
The difference between the arguments from causation
286:
with no beginning and no end (which in turn follows
271:
assertion of a non-eternal universe would require a
5259:
5221:
5174:
5151:
5043:
4981:
4857:
4809:
4759:
4715:
4642:
4603:
4567:
4504:
4493:
4446:
4341:
4332:
4179:
4083:
3968:
3888:
3823:
3745:
3652:
3637:
3589:
3551:
3263:
3188:
3063:
3054:
2984:
2912:
2843:
1210:(Fall 2006 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) ed.)
824:, who popularized and is notable for defending the
2237:The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, p.192
669:If A is first then we have reached the conclusion.
2610:A New Kalam Argument: Revenge of the Grim Reaper.
1242:The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion
2564:International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
2450:International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
2400:International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
2387:International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
2306:"Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God"
1880:. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
1722:International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
1301:Cosmological Argument". In Craig, William Lane;
716:is an infinite series of entities governed by a
510:This explanation must involve a necessary being.
507:Therefore, there is an explanation of this fact.
138:, itself a modern exposition of the claim that "
1991:. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
1740:, Volume 79, Issue 1, January 2019, pages 10-17
1407:, Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001, pp. 1–5, 13.
1404:The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz
1267:The Cosmological Argument From Plato to Leibniz
960:
854:) reasoning, which is dependent on experience.
656:Not by nothing, because nothing causes nothing.
398:
3095:
1978:
1976:
1974:
1972:
1970:
639:Metaphysical argument for the existence of God
4293:
2821:
1197:
1195:
1193:
617:, presents it in the following general form:
562:is generally translated as "becoming", while
282:Like Plato, Aristotle believed in an eternal
8:
1900:. Department of Philosophy, Lund University.
1804:Craig, William Lane; Moreland, J.P. (2009).
958:has called this the Hume-Edwards principle:
347:(c. 980–1037) inquired into the question of
150:defenders of cosmological arguments include
106:. The history of this argument goes back to
1806:The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology
1735:"From a necessary being to a perfect being"
1307:The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology
840:Secondly, it is argued that the premise of
633:The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology
5040:
5029:
4756:
4501:
4338:
4329:
4316:
4300:
4286:
4278:
3649:
3060:
2918:
2828:
2814:
2806:
2008:
2006:
1867:
1865:
1863:
1861:
1859:
1857:
1297:; Sinclair, James D. (May 18, 2009). "The
1012:Some cosmologists and physicists, such as
701:Cosmological argument and infinite regress
4227:Relationship between religion and science
2369:(Cham: Springer Nature, 2017), chapter 4.
2057:
1952:
1950:
1948:
1946:
1944:
1942:
1940:
1938:
1889:
1887:
1335:"A New Look at the Cosmological Argument"
1024:states that it is the point in which all
566:is generally translated as "in essence".
527:BCCF, because every contingent fact is a
501:Every contingent fact has an explanation.
2672:
2670:
2668:
2485:"Infinite Causal Chains and Explanation"
2377:
2375:
2075:"What Not to Multiply Without Necessity"
672:If A is not first, then we return to 2).
2250:. Socialresearchmethods.net. 2006-10-20
2215:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1989:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1878:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1666:The Monadology: An Edition for Students
1208:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1189:
1028:came into existence, the start of both
199:, both developed first cause arguments.
3153:Proper basis and Reformed epistemology
1821:
1002:essential and accidental causal chains
872:. However, as to whether inductive or
30:{{Philosophy of religion sidebar|God}
2435:Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
2185:Clarke, W. Norris (August 25, 2009).
1309:. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 101–201.
973:Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
7:
2694:"Will the Universe Expand Forever?""
2117:"Vicious Infinite Regress Arguments"
1556:Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas
1435:Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1265:Craig, William Lane (October 2001).
830:Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel
775:. A more promising view is that the
763:, i.e. that it involves an outright
675:From 3) and 4), we produce another-
497:formulates the argument as follows:
351:, in which he distinguished between
323:or capriciousness from the immortal
2798:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2728:Britt, Robert R. (April 18, 2001).
2627:Five Proofs of the Existence of God
1506:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
943:Existence of infinite causal chains
682:An infinite series is not possible.
5317:Arguments for the existence of God
2608:15: 463–469; Koons, Robert. 2014.
2518:Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
2082:Australasian Journal of Philosophy
1701:"On 'a new cosmological argument'"
726:positive infinite regress argument
25:
4865:Attributes of God in Christianity
913:in which much of the first part (
484:made a similar argument with his
63:argument from universal causation
27:Argument for the existence of God
5292:
4262:
4261:
4251:
1342:American Philosophical Quarterly
779:is to be rejected because it is
755:. It is sometimes held that the
743:A regress can be vicious due to
4923:Great Architect of the Universe
1963:. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
1718:"From a Necessary Being to God"
1670:Jonathan Bennett's translation.
1244:. Routledge. pp. 341–350.
885:Not evidence for a theistic God
803:Objections and counterarguments
2333:"Summa Theologiae, Prima Pars"
2304:Cline, Austin (27 July 2015).
1751:Principles of Natural Theology
1524:Encyclopædia Britannica Online
808:"What caused the first cause?"
519:principle of sufficient reason
486:principle of sufficient reason
432:formulated the "argument from
128:principle of sufficient reason
1:
4702:Trinity of the Church Fathers
1749:Joyce, George Hayward (1922)
631:Craig analyses this cause in
110:or earlier, was developed in
4192:Desacralization of knowledge
2308:. About, Inc. Archived from
2094:10.1080/00048402.2014.992447
2015:"Infinite Regress Arguments"
2013:Wieland, Jan Willem (2013).
1913:"Infinite Regress Arguments"
1911:Day, Timothy Joseph (1987).
1874:"Infinite Regress Arguments"
1668:. Uni. of Pittsburgh Press.
624:The universe began to exist.
513:This necessary being is God.
4953:Phenomenological definition
3604:Best of all possible worlds
3561:Eschatological verification
3118:Fine-tuning of the universe
2732:. Space.com. Archived from
2270:"THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT"
2248:"Deduction & Induction"
2162:. About.com. Archived from
2073:Schaffer, Jonathan (2015).
1983:Reichenbach, Bruce (2021).
1753:. New York: Longmans Green.
1547:, Humanities-Ebooks, p.165.
1381:. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
1202:Reichenbach, Bruce (2012).
925:A causal loop is a form of
879:Kalam cosmological argument
826:Kalam cosmological argument
606:Kalam cosmological argument
600:Kalām cosmological argument
558:is a fairly important one.
517:Premise 1 is a form of the
5348:
2121:Philosophical Perspectives
1456:Bryn Mawr Classical Review
745:metaphysical impossibility
650:Something can be produced.
603:
292:nothing comes from nothing
239:
140:nothing comes from nothing
5290:
5039:
5028:
4328:
4315:
4247:
2921:
2201:– via Google Books.
2031:10.1007/s12136-012-0165-1
1929:10.1080/05568648709506273
1590:"Summa Theologica I Q2.3"
1271:Wipf and Stock Publishers
921:Existence of causal loops
761:metaphysically impossible
759:is vicious because it is
722:infinite regress argument
709:infinite regress argument
420:Argument from contingency
290:' famous statement that "
275:– in his terminology, an
67:argument from first cause
4707:Trinitarian universalism
3833:Friedrich Schleiermacher
3419:Theories about religions
3221:Inconsistent revelations
2602:God and Ultimate Origins
2437:. London: Penguin Books.
2367:God and Ultimate Origins
1828:: CS1 maint: location (
1502:"Ibn Sina's Metaphysics"
1167:Timeline of the Big Bang
1040:, David N. Schramm, and
844:has been arrived at via
415:Versions of the argument
5327:Concepts in metaphysics
4909:Godhead in Christianity
2789:"Cosmological Argument"
2762:. St. Augustine Press.
2530:10.1023/A:1011830602137
1985:"Cosmological Argument"
1437:(1967), Vol. 2, p. 233
1204:"Cosmological Argument"
1018:Wheeler–DeWitt equation
968:infinite causal regress
480:The German philosopher
312:uniform circular motion
5332:Philosophy of religion
3697:Gaunilo of Marmoutiers
2837:Philosophy of religion
2191:. Fordham Univ Press.
2115:Clark, Romane (1988).
1872:Cameron, Ross (2018).
964:
927:predestination paradox
740:in order to avoid it.
685:Therefore, God exists.
662:Therefore, by another
403:
259:. Aristotle argued in
240:πρῶτον κινοῦν ἀκίνητον
200:
118:and later in medieval
53:from facts concerning
43:philosophy of religion
4735:Fate of the unlearned
4687:Shield of the Trinity
4232:Faith and rationality
4187:Criticism of religion
4125:Robert Merrihew Adams
4115:Nicholas Wolterstorff
3318:Divine command theory
2760:The Last Superstition
1632:Summa Theologiae, I:
1377:, eds. (March 2003).
394:Proof of the Truthful
314:. The unmoved movers
181:
35:cosmological argument
4222:Religious philosophy
3702:Pico della Mirandola
3667:Anselm of Canterbury
3599:Augustinian theodicy
3511:Religious skepticism
2844:Concepts in religion
2787:Reichenbach, Bruce.
2690:Tinsley, Beatrice M.
2678:Gott III, J. Richard
2652:"Time may not exist"
2433:Hume, David (1779).
2381:Alexander R. Pruss,
1960:Approaching Infinity
1917:Philosophical Papers
1673:Latta's translation.
1607:Summa Theologiae, I:
1379:The Existence of God
860:problem of induction
273:first uncaused cause
206:(c. 427–347 BC) and
196:The School of Athens
75:prime mover argument
18:First cause argument
5269:Slavic Native Faith
4692:Trinitarian formula
4629:Father of Greatness
4512:Abrahamic religions
4207:History of religion
3908:Friedrich Nietzsche
3785:Gottfried W Leibniz
3780:Nicolas Malebranche
3712:King James VI and I
2992:Abrahamic religions
2699:Scientific American
2606:Philosophia Christi
2166:on October 18, 2011
1848:www.logicmuseum.com
1716:Rasmussen, Joshua.
1620:William of Moerbeke
1565:Scott David Foutz,
1295:Craig, William Lane
1076:Ex nihilo nihil fit
874:deductive reasoning
797:explanatory failure
753:explanatory failure
524:logical conjunction
465:universal causation
189:, depicted here in
5231:Abrahamic prophecy
5161:Ayyavazhi theology
4933:Apophatic theology
4322:Conceptions of God
4217:Religious language
4197:Ethics in religion
4155:William Lane Craig
4030:Charles Hartshorne
3770:Desiderius Erasmus
3672:Augustine of Hippo
3614:Inconsistent triad
3576:Apophatic theology
3571:Logical positivism
3553:Religious language
3173:Watchmaker analogy
3138:Necessary existent
2914:Conceptions of God
2874:Intelligent design
2629:. Ignatius Press.
2576:10.1007/BF00143159
2462:10.1007/BF00131845
2412:10.1007/BF00143159
2312:on 18 October 2011
2268:Craig, William L.
1777:Craig, William L.
1678:2015-11-17 at the
1572:2008-05-09 at the
1482:plato.stanford.edu
1373:Gale, Richard M.;
1269:. Eugene, Oregon:
1230:Oderberg, David S.
1087:Biblical cosmology
1008:Big Bang cosmology
822:William Lane Craig
795:as vicious due to
615:Western philosophy
611:William Lane Craig
572:watchmaker analogy
201:
152:William Lane Craig
116:early Christianity
5304:
5303:
5286:
5285:
5282:
5281:
5024:
5023:
5020:
5019:
4915:Latter Day Saints
4884:Divine simplicity
4805:
4804:
4662:Consubstantiality
4638:
4637:
4489:
4488:
4433:Theistic finitism
4275:
4274:
4175:
4174:
4135:Peter van Inwagen
4120:Richard Swinburne
4065:George I Mavrodes
3925:Vladimir Solovyov
3865:Søren Kierkegaard
3790:William Wollaston
3737:William of Ockham
3717:Marcion of Sinope
3619:Irenaean theodicy
3609:Euthyphro dilemma
3536:Transcendentalism
3365:Womanist theology
3355:Feminist theology
3259:
3258:
3050:
3049:
2936:Divine simplicity
2856:Euthyphro dilemma
2686:Schramm, David N.
2612:Noûs 48: 256–267.
2331:Aquinas, Thomas.
1815:978-1-4051-7657-6
1705:Religious Studies
1594:www.newadvent.org
1162:Temporal finitism
1069:Creatio ex nihilo
858:highlighted this
793:regress of causes
777:regress of causes
773:regress of causes
757:regress of causes
730:regress of causes
482:Gottfried Leibniz
440:in claiming that
304:celestial spheres
229:Aristotle argued
132:Gottfried Leibniz
16:(Redirected from
5339:
5296:
5041:
5030:
4917:
4757:
4652:Athanasian Creed
4502:
4339:
4330:
4317:
4302:
4295:
4288:
4279:
4265:
4264:
4255:
4160:Ali Akbar Rashad
4023:Reinhold Niebuhr
3983:Bertrand Russell
3978:George Santayana
3875:Albrecht Ritschl
3860:Ludwig Feuerbach
3650:
3646:(by date active)
3506:Process theology
3251:Russell's teapot
3061:
3056:Existence of God
2966:Process theology
2919:
2904:Theological veto
2867:religious belief
2830:
2823:
2816:
2807:
2802:
2793:Zalta, Edward N.
2774:
2773:
2752:
2746:
2745:
2743:
2741:
2725:
2719:
2718:
2716:
2714:
2674:
2663:
2662:
2660:
2658:
2647:
2641:
2640:
2619:
2613:
2598:
2592:
2591:
2570:(1–3): 101–115.
2559:
2553:
2552:
2513:
2507:
2506:
2504:
2503:
2497:
2491:. Archived from
2480:
2474:
2473:
2445:
2439:
2438:
2430:
2424:
2423:
2406:(1–3): 101–115.
2395:
2389:
2379:
2370:
2363:
2357:
2349:Richard Hanley,
2347:
2341:
2340:
2328:
2322:
2321:
2319:
2317:
2301:
2295:
2292:
2286:
2285:
2283:
2281:
2265:
2259:
2258:
2256:
2255:
2244:
2238:
2235:
2229:
2226:
2220:
2219:
2209:
2203:
2202:
2182:
2176:
2175:
2173:
2171:
2151:
2145:
2144:
2112:
2106:
2105:
2079:
2070:
2064:
2063:
2061:
2049:
2043:
2042:
2010:
2001:
2000:
1998:
1996:
1980:
1965:
1964:
1954:
1933:
1932:
1908:
1902:
1901:
1897:Hommage À Wlodek
1891:
1882:
1881:
1869:
1852:
1851:
1840:
1834:
1833:
1827:
1819:
1801:
1795:
1794:
1792:
1790:
1774:
1768:
1767:
1760:
1754:
1747:
1741:
1731:
1725:
1714:
1708:
1697:
1691:
1688:
1682:
1664:, trans., 1991.
1662:Nicholas Rescher
1655:
1649:
1648:
1641:
1635:
1629:
1623:
1616:
1610:
1604:
1598:
1597:
1586:
1580:
1563:
1557:
1554:
1548:
1541:
1535:
1534:
1532:
1531:
1516:
1510:
1509:
1498:
1492:
1491:
1489:
1488:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1448:
1442:
1431:
1425:
1414:
1408:
1399:
1393:
1392:
1375:Pruss, Alexander
1370:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1360:
1354:
1339:
1327:
1321:
1320:
1291:
1285:
1284:
1262:
1256:
1255:
1226:
1220:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1199:
1042:Beatrice Tinsley
911:Summa Theologiae
864:causal relations
862:and argued that
815:special pleading
714:infinite regress
691:infinite regress
587:The philosopher
452:(something that
408:Summa Theologica
265:celestial sphere
242:
241:
142:" attributed to
130:as addressed by
120:Islamic theology
39:natural theology
21:
5347:
5346:
5342:
5341:
5340:
5338:
5337:
5336:
5307:
5306:
5305:
5300:
5298:Religion portal
5278:
5255:
5217:
5198:Holy Scriptures
5170:
5147:
5035:
5016:
4977:
4913:
4889:Divine presence
4853:
4801:
4755:
4711:
4657:Comma Johanneum
4634:
4599:
4563:
4497:
4485:
4442:
4324:
4311:
4306:
4276:
4271:
4243:
4171:
4167:Alexander Pruss
4150:Jean-Luc Marion
4105:Alvin Plantinga
4100:Dewi Z Phillips
4087:
4085:
4079:
4050:Walter Kaufmann
4040:Frithjof Schuon
4013:Rudolf Bultmann
3970:
3964:
3960:Joseph Maréchal
3950:Pavel Florensky
3945:Sergei Bulgakov
3930:Ernst Troeltsch
3913:Harald Høffding
3890:
3884:
3855:William Whewell
3843:Georg W F Hegel
3838:Karl C F Krause
3825:
3819:
3815:Johann G Herder
3805:Baron d'Holbach
3755:Augustin Calmet
3741:
3657:
3645:
3644:
3641:
3633:
3591:Problem of evil
3585:
3581:Verificationism
3547:
3255:
3201:Atheist's Wager
3184:
3046:
2980:
2908:
2884:Problem of evil
2839:
2834:
2786:
2783:
2778:
2777:
2770:
2754:
2753:
2749:
2739:
2737:
2727:
2726:
2722:
2712:
2710:
2676:
2675:
2666:
2656:
2654:
2649:
2648:
2644:
2637:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2599:
2595:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2501:
2499:
2495:
2483:Rota, Michael.
2482:
2481:
2477:
2447:
2446:
2442:
2432:
2431:
2427:
2397:
2396:
2392:
2380:
2373:
2364:
2360:
2348:
2344:
2330:
2329:
2325:
2315:
2313:
2303:
2302:
2298:
2293:
2289:
2279:
2277:
2267:
2266:
2262:
2253:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2236:
2232:
2227:
2223:
2211:
2210:
2206:
2199:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2169:
2167:
2160:Learn Religions
2154:Cline, Austin.
2153:
2152:
2148:
2133:10.2307/2214081
2114:
2113:
2109:
2077:
2072:
2071:
2067:
2051:
2050:
2046:
2012:
2011:
2004:
1994:
1992:
1982:
1981:
1968:
1956:
1955:
1936:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1893:
1892:
1885:
1871:
1870:
1855:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1820:
1816:
1803:
1802:
1798:
1788:
1786:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1748:
1744:
1733:Byerly, Ryan T
1732:
1728:
1715:
1711:
1698:
1694:
1689:
1685:
1680:Wayback Machine
1656:
1652:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1630:
1626:
1617:
1613:
1605:
1601:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1574:Wayback Machine
1564:
1560:
1555:
1551:
1542:
1538:
1529:
1527:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1486:
1484:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1432:
1428:
1415:
1411:
1400:
1396:
1389:
1372:
1371:
1367:
1358:
1356:
1352:
1337:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1317:
1303:Moreland, J. P.
1293:
1292:
1288:
1281:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1252:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1213:
1211:
1201:
1200:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1117:First Principle
1107:Dating Creation
1063:
1022:Big Bang theory
1010:
956:William L. Rowe
945:
923:
903:omnibenevolence
887:
810:
805:
769:actual infinity
703:
641:
608:
602:
544:
495:Alexander Pruss
422:
417:
376:John Philoponus
176:
168:Alexander Pruss
98:, subsequently
71:causal argument
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
5345:
5343:
5335:
5334:
5329:
5324:
5319:
5309:
5308:
5302:
5301:
5291:
5288:
5287:
5284:
5283:
5280:
5279:
5277:
5276:
5271:
5265:
5263:
5257:
5256:
5254:
5253:
5248:
5243:
5238:
5233:
5227:
5225:
5219:
5218:
5216:
5215:
5210:
5208:Predestination
5205:
5200:
5195:
5190:
5180:
5178:
5172:
5171:
5169:
5168:
5163:
5157:
5155:
5149:
5148:
5146:
5145:
5140:
5135:
5130:
5125:
5120:
5115:
5110:
5105:
5100:
5095:
5090:
5085:
5080:
5075:
5070:
5065:
5063:Biblical canon
5060:
5055:
5049:
5047:
5037:
5036:
5033:
5026:
5025:
5022:
5021:
5018:
5017:
5015:
5014:
5009:
5004:
4999:
4994:
4988:
4986:
4979:
4978:
4976:
4975:
4970:
4965:
4960:
4955:
4950:
4945:
4940:
4935:
4930:
4925:
4920:
4919:
4918:
4906:
4901:
4896:
4891:
4886:
4881:
4876:
4871:
4861:
4859:
4858:Other concepts
4855:
4854:
4852:
4851:
4846:
4841:
4836:
4831:
4826:
4821:
4815:
4813:
4807:
4806:
4803:
4802:
4800:
4799:
4794:
4789:
4784:
4779:
4774:
4769:
4763:
4761:
4754:
4753:
4744:
4743:
4742:
4732:
4730:Apocalypticism
4727:
4721:
4719:
4713:
4712:
4710:
4709:
4704:
4699:
4694:
4689:
4684:
4679:
4674:
4669:
4664:
4659:
4654:
4648:
4646:
4644:Trinitarianism
4640:
4639:
4636:
4635:
4633:
4632:
4618:
4613:
4607:
4605:
4601:
4600:
4598:
4597:
4592:
4587:
4582:
4577:
4571:
4569:
4565:
4564:
4562:
4561:
4559:Zoroastrianism
4556:
4551:
4546:
4541:
4536:
4535:
4534:
4529:
4524:
4519:
4508:
4506:
4499:
4491:
4490:
4487:
4486:
4484:
4483:
4478:
4477:
4476:
4463:
4458:
4453:
4450:
4448:
4444:
4443:
4441:
4440:
4435:
4430:
4425:
4420:
4415:
4410:
4405:
4400:
4395:
4394:
4393:
4391:Urmonotheismus
4383:
4378:
4373:
4368:
4363:
4358:
4353:
4348:
4345:
4343:
4336:
4326:
4325:
4320:
4313:
4312:
4307:
4305:
4304:
4297:
4290:
4282:
4273:
4272:
4270:
4269:
4259:
4248:
4245:
4244:
4242:
4241:
4234:
4229:
4224:
4219:
4214:
4209:
4204:
4199:
4194:
4189:
4183:
4181:
4180:Related topics
4177:
4176:
4173:
4172:
4170:
4169:
4163:
4162:
4157:
4152:
4147:
4142:
4140:Daniel Dennett
4137:
4132:
4130:Ravi Zacharias
4127:
4122:
4117:
4112:
4107:
4102:
4097:
4095:William L Rowe
4091:
4089:
4081:
4080:
4078:
4077:
4072:
4070:William Alston
4067:
4062:
4057:
4052:
4047:
4042:
4037:
4032:
4026:
4025:
4020:
4018:Gabriel Marcel
4015:
4010:
4005:
4000:
3995:
3990:
3985:
3980:
3974:
3972:
3966:
3965:
3963:
3962:
3957:
3955:Ernst Cassirer
3952:
3947:
3942:
3937:
3932:
3927:
3921:
3920:
3915:
3910:
3905:
3900:
3894:
3892:
3886:
3885:
3883:
3882:
3877:
3872:
3867:
3862:
3857:
3852:
3850:Thomas Carlyle
3846:
3845:
3840:
3835:
3829:
3827:
3821:
3820:
3818:
3817:
3812:
3807:
3802:
3797:
3792:
3787:
3782:
3777:
3775:Baruch Spinoza
3772:
3767:
3762:
3760:René Descartes
3757:
3751:
3749:
3743:
3742:
3740:
3739:
3734:
3732:Thomas Aquinas
3729:
3724:
3719:
3714:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3674:
3669:
3663:
3661:
3647:
3638:
3635:
3634:
3632:
3631:
3626:
3621:
3616:
3611:
3606:
3601:
3595:
3593:
3587:
3586:
3584:
3583:
3578:
3573:
3568:
3563:
3557:
3555:
3549:
3548:
3546:
3545:
3538:
3533:
3528:
3523:
3518:
3513:
3508:
3503:
3501:Possibilianism
3498:
3493:
3488:
3483:
3478:
3473:
3468:
3463:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3404:
3399:
3389:
3384:
3379:
3377:Fundamentalism
3374:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3362:
3352:
3351:
3350:
3345:
3338:Existentialism
3335:
3330:
3325:
3320:
3315:
3310:
3305:
3300:
3295:
3290:
3285:
3280:
3275:
3269:
3267:
3261:
3260:
3257:
3256:
3254:
3253:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3231:Noncognitivism
3228:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3208:
3203:
3198:
3192:
3190:
3186:
3185:
3183:
3182:
3180:Transcendental
3177:
3176:
3175:
3170:
3160:
3155:
3150:
3148:Pascal's wager
3145:
3140:
3135:
3130:
3125:
3120:
3115:
3110:
3105:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3093:
3083:
3078:
3076:Christological
3073:
3067:
3065:
3058:
3052:
3051:
3048:
3047:
3045:
3044:
3039:
3034:
3029:
3024:
3019:
3014:
3009:
3004:
2999:
2994:
2988:
2986:
2982:
2981:
2979:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2922:
2916:
2910:
2909:
2907:
2906:
2901:
2896:
2891:
2886:
2881:
2876:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2858:
2853:
2847:
2845:
2841:
2840:
2835:
2833:
2832:
2825:
2818:
2810:
2804:
2803:
2782:
2781:External links
2779:
2776:
2775:
2769:978-1587314520
2768:
2747:
2736:on 11 May 2008
2720:
2702:. p. 65.
2692:(March 1976).
2682:Gunn, James E.
2664:
2642:
2636:978-1621641339
2635:
2614:
2593:
2554:
2524:(4): 319–336.
2508:
2475:
2440:
2425:
2390:
2371:
2358:
2342:
2323:
2296:
2287:
2260:
2239:
2230:
2221:
2204:
2197:
2177:
2146:
2107:
2088:(4): 644–664.
2065:
2044:
2019:Acta Analytica
2002:
1966:
1934:
1923:(2): 155–164.
1903:
1883:
1853:
1835:
1814:
1796:
1769:
1755:
1742:
1726:
1709:
1699:Oppy, Graham.
1692:
1683:
1650:
1636:
1624:
1611:
1599:
1581:
1558:
1549:
1536:
1511:
1493:
1469:
1443:
1426:
1409:
1394:
1388:978-0754620518
1387:
1365:
1322:
1316:978-1405176576
1315:
1286:
1279:
1257:
1251:978-0415380386
1250:
1221:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1084:
1079:
1072:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1052:. Philosopher
1009:
1006:
944:
941:
936:Richard Hanley
922:
919:
886:
883:
866:were not true
809:
806:
804:
801:
789:Ockham's razor
749:implausibility
702:
699:
687:
686:
683:
680:
673:
670:
667:
660:
657:
654:
651:
640:
637:
629:
628:
625:
622:
604:Main article:
601:
598:
543:
534:
515:
514:
511:
508:
505:
502:
458:uncaused cause
421:
418:
416:
413:
390:Thomas Aquinas
335:creatio ex deo
175:
172:
124:Thomas Aquinas
82:(essentiality)
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5344:
5333:
5330:
5328:
5325:
5323:
5320:
5318:
5315:
5314:
5312:
5299:
5295:
5289:
5275:
5272:
5270:
5267:
5266:
5264:
5262:
5258:
5252:
5249:
5247:
5244:
5242:
5241:Denominations
5239:
5237:
5234:
5232:
5229:
5228:
5226:
5224:
5220:
5214:
5213:Last Judgment
5211:
5209:
5206:
5204:
5201:
5199:
5196:
5194:
5191:
5189:
5185:
5182:
5181:
5179:
5177:
5173:
5167:
5164:
5162:
5159:
5158:
5156:
5154:
5150:
5144:
5141:
5139:
5136:
5134:
5131:
5129:
5126:
5124:
5121:
5119:
5116:
5114:
5111:
5109:
5106:
5104:
5101:
5099:
5096:
5094:
5091:
5089:
5086:
5084:
5081:
5079:
5076:
5074:
5071:
5069:
5066:
5064:
5061:
5059:
5056:
5054:
5051:
5050:
5048:
5046:
5042:
5038:
5031:
5027:
5013:
5010:
5008:
5005:
5003:
5000:
4998:
4995:
4993:
4990:
4989:
4987:
4984:
4980:
4974:
4973:Unmoved mover
4971:
4969:
4966:
4964:
4961:
4959:
4956:
4954:
4951:
4949:
4946:
4944:
4941:
4939:
4936:
4934:
4931:
4929:
4926:
4924:
4921:
4916:
4912:
4911:
4910:
4907:
4905:
4902:
4900:
4897:
4895:
4892:
4890:
4887:
4885:
4882:
4880:
4877:
4875:
4874:Binitarianism
4872:
4870:
4866:
4863:
4862:
4860:
4856:
4850:
4847:
4845:
4842:
4840:
4837:
4835:
4832:
4830:
4827:
4825:
4822:
4820:
4817:
4816:
4814:
4812:
4808:
4798:
4795:
4793:
4790:
4788:
4785:
4783:
4780:
4778:
4775:
4773:
4770:
4768:
4765:
4764:
4762:
4758:
4752:
4748:
4745:
4741:
4738:
4737:
4736:
4733:
4731:
4728:
4726:
4723:
4722:
4720:
4718:
4714:
4708:
4705:
4703:
4700:
4698:
4695:
4693:
4690:
4688:
4685:
4683:
4680:
4678:
4675:
4673:
4670:
4668:
4665:
4663:
4660:
4658:
4655:
4653:
4650:
4649:
4647:
4645:
4641:
4630:
4626:
4622:
4619:
4617:
4614:
4612:
4609:
4608:
4606:
4602:
4596:
4595:Supreme Being
4593:
4591:
4588:
4586:
4583:
4581:
4578:
4576:
4573:
4572:
4570:
4566:
4560:
4557:
4555:
4552:
4550:
4547:
4545:
4542:
4540:
4537:
4533:
4530:
4528:
4525:
4523:
4520:
4518:
4515:
4514:
4513:
4510:
4509:
4507:
4503:
4500:
4496:
4492:
4482:
4479:
4475:
4472:
4471:
4470:
4467:
4466:Gender of God
4464:
4462:
4459:
4457:
4454:
4452:
4451:
4449:
4445:
4439:
4436:
4434:
4431:
4429:
4426:
4424:
4421:
4419:
4416:
4414:
4411:
4409:
4406:
4404:
4401:
4399:
4396:
4392:
4389:
4388:
4387:
4384:
4382:
4379:
4377:
4374:
4372:
4371:Kathenotheism
4369:
4367:
4364:
4362:
4359:
4357:
4354:
4352:
4349:
4347:
4346:
4344:
4340:
4337:
4335:
4331:
4327:
4323:
4318:
4314:
4310:
4303:
4298:
4296:
4291:
4289:
4284:
4283:
4280:
4268:
4260:
4258:
4254:
4250:
4249:
4246:
4240:
4239:
4235:
4233:
4230:
4228:
4225:
4223:
4220:
4218:
4215:
4213:
4210:
4208:
4205:
4203:
4200:
4198:
4195:
4193:
4190:
4188:
4185:
4184:
4182:
4178:
4168:
4165:
4164:
4161:
4158:
4156:
4153:
4151:
4148:
4146:
4143:
4141:
4138:
4136:
4133:
4131:
4128:
4126:
4123:
4121:
4118:
4116:
4113:
4111:
4110:Anthony Kenny
4108:
4106:
4103:
4101:
4098:
4096:
4093:
4092:
4090:
4082:
4076:
4073:
4071:
4068:
4066:
4063:
4061:
4058:
4056:
4053:
4051:
4048:
4046:
4043:
4041:
4038:
4036:
4035:Mircea Eliade
4033:
4031:
4028:
4027:
4024:
4021:
4019:
4016:
4014:
4011:
4009:
4006:
4004:
4001:
3999:
3996:
3994:
3991:
3989:
3986:
3984:
3981:
3979:
3976:
3975:
3973:
3967:
3961:
3958:
3956:
3953:
3951:
3948:
3946:
3943:
3941:
3938:
3936:
3933:
3931:
3928:
3926:
3923:
3922:
3919:
3918:William James
3916:
3914:
3911:
3909:
3906:
3904:
3901:
3899:
3898:Ernst Haeckel
3896:
3895:
3893:
3887:
3881:
3878:
3876:
3873:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3853:
3851:
3848:
3847:
3844:
3841:
3839:
3836:
3834:
3831:
3830:
3828:
3822:
3816:
3813:
3811:
3810:Immanuel Kant
3808:
3806:
3803:
3801:
3798:
3796:
3793:
3791:
3788:
3786:
3783:
3781:
3778:
3776:
3773:
3771:
3768:
3766:
3765:Blaise Pascal
3763:
3761:
3758:
3756:
3753:
3752:
3750:
3748:
3744:
3738:
3735:
3733:
3730:
3728:
3725:
3723:
3720:
3718:
3715:
3713:
3710:
3708:
3705:
3703:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3665:
3664:
3662:
3660:
3655:
3651:
3648:
3643:
3636:
3630:
3627:
3625:
3622:
3620:
3617:
3615:
3612:
3610:
3607:
3605:
3602:
3600:
3597:
3596:
3594:
3592:
3588:
3582:
3579:
3577:
3574:
3572:
3569:
3567:
3566:Language game
3564:
3562:
3559:
3558:
3556:
3554:
3550:
3544:
3543:
3539:
3537:
3534:
3532:
3529:
3527:
3524:
3522:
3519:
3517:
3514:
3512:
3509:
3507:
3504:
3502:
3499:
3497:
3494:
3492:
3489:
3487:
3484:
3482:
3479:
3477:
3474:
3472:
3469:
3467:
3464:
3462:
3459:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3408:
3405:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3378:
3375:
3373:
3370:
3366:
3363:
3361:
3358:
3357:
3356:
3353:
3349:
3346:
3344:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3336:
3334:
3331:
3329:
3326:
3324:
3321:
3319:
3316:
3314:
3311:
3309:
3306:
3304:
3301:
3299:
3296:
3294:
3291:
3289:
3286:
3284:
3281:
3279:
3276:
3274:
3271:
3270:
3268:
3266:
3262:
3252:
3249:
3247:
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3236:Occam's razor
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3209:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3197:
3194:
3193:
3191:
3187:
3181:
3178:
3174:
3171:
3169:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3161:
3159:
3156:
3154:
3151:
3149:
3146:
3144:
3141:
3139:
3136:
3134:
3131:
3129:
3126:
3124:
3121:
3119:
3116:
3114:
3111:
3109:
3106:
3104:
3101:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3081:Consciousness
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3068:
3066:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3053:
3043:
3040:
3038:
3035:
3033:
3030:
3028:
3025:
3023:
3020:
3018:
3015:
3013:
3010:
3008:
3005:
3003:
3000:
2998:
2995:
2993:
2990:
2989:
2987:
2983:
2977:
2976:Unmoved mover
2974:
2972:
2971:Supreme Being
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2917:
2915:
2911:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2897:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2882:
2880:
2877:
2875:
2872:
2868:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2848:
2846:
2842:
2838:
2831:
2826:
2824:
2819:
2817:
2812:
2811:
2808:
2800:
2799:
2794:
2790:
2785:
2784:
2780:
2771:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2756:Feser, Edward
2751:
2748:
2735:
2731:
2724:
2721:
2709:
2705:
2701:
2700:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2673:
2671:
2669:
2665:
2653:
2650:Folger, Tim.
2646:
2643:
2638:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2623:Feser, Edward
2618:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2600:Andrew Loke,
2597:
2594:
2590:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2558:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2519:
2512:
2509:
2498:on 2016-03-28
2494:
2490:
2486:
2479:
2476:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2451:
2444:
2441:
2436:
2429:
2426:
2421:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2394:
2391:
2388:
2384:
2378:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2365:Andrew Loke,
2362:
2359:
2356:
2352:
2346:
2343:
2338:
2334:
2327:
2324:
2311:
2307:
2300:
2297:
2291:
2288:
2275:
2271:
2264:
2261:
2249:
2243:
2240:
2234:
2231:
2225:
2222:
2217:
2216:
2208:
2205:
2200:
2198:9780823229307
2194:
2190:
2189:
2181:
2178:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2150:
2147:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2111:
2108:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2076:
2069:
2066:
2060:
2055:
2048:
2045:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2025:(1): 95–109.
2024:
2020:
2016:
2009:
2007:
2003:
1990:
1986:
1979:
1977:
1975:
1973:
1971:
1967:
1962:
1961:
1953:
1951:
1949:
1947:
1945:
1943:
1941:
1939:
1935:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1907:
1904:
1899:
1898:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1879:
1875:
1868:
1866:
1864:
1862:
1860:
1858:
1854:
1849:
1845:
1839:
1836:
1831:
1825:
1817:
1811:
1807:
1800:
1797:
1785:. Leaderu.com
1784:
1783:Truth Journal
1780:
1773:
1770:
1765:
1759:
1756:
1752:
1746:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1696:
1693:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1654:
1651:
1646:
1640:
1637:
1633:
1628:
1625:
1621:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1603:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1585:
1582:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1568:
1562:
1559:
1553:
1550:
1546:
1540:
1537:
1525:
1521:
1515:
1512:
1507:
1503:
1497:
1494:
1483:
1479:
1473:
1470:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1447:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1398:
1395:
1390:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1369:
1366:
1355:on 2003-03-14
1351:
1347:
1343:
1336:
1332:
1331:Koons, Robert
1326:
1323:
1318:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1290:
1287:
1282:
1280:1-57910-787-7
1276:
1273:. p. x.
1272:
1268:
1261:
1258:
1253:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:Meister, Chad
1231:
1225:
1222:
1209:
1205:
1198:
1196:
1194:
1190:
1183:
1178:
1177:Unmoved mover
1175:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1145:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1102:Creation myth
1100:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:James E. Gunn
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1014:Carlo Rovelli
1007:
1005:
1003:
998:
994:
990:
985:
981:
979:
975:
974:
969:
963:
959:
957:
953:
949:
942:
940:
937:
933:
928:
920:
918:
916:
912:
906:
904:
900:
896:
893:god, such as
892:
884:
882:
880:
875:
871:
870:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
843:
838:
836:
835:Occam's razor
831:
827:
823:
819:
816:
807:
802:
800:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:contradiction
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
741:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
700:
698:
696:
692:
684:
681:
678:
674:
671:
668:
665:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
648:
647:
645:
638:
636:
634:
626:
623:
620:
619:
618:
616:
612:
607:
599:
597:
595:
590:
585:
583:
579:
575:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
556:
551:
550:
542:
538:
535:
533:
530:
525:
520:
512:
509:
506:
503:
500:
499:
498:
496:
490:
487:
483:
478:
474:
472:
471:
466:
461:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:", following
435:
431:
427:
419:
414:
412:
410:
409:
402:
397:
395:
391:
387:
385:
381:
377:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
326:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
252:
251:
246:
236:
235:unmoved mover
232:
227:
225:
224:
219:
215:
214:
209:
205:
198:
197:
192:
188:
184:
180:
173:
171:
169:
165:
164:Stephen Meyer
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
136:Samuel Clarke
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
90:
88:
83:
81:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
31:
19:
5108:Hamartiology
5093:Ecclesiology
5083:Pneumatology
4992:Christianity
4983:Names of God
4958:Philo's view
4948:Personal god
4928:Great Spirit
4867: /
4824:Christianity
4682:Perichoresis
4585:Emanationism
4527:Christianity
4517:Baháʼí Faith
4495:Singular god
4468:
4428:Spiritualism
4236:
4055:Martin Lings
4008:Emil Brunner
3998:Paul Tillich
3988:Martin Buber
3903:W K Clifford
3880:Afrikan Spir
3795:Thomas Chubb
3747:Early modern
3727:Adi Shankara
3640:Philosophers
3624:Natural evil
3540:
3516:Spiritualism
3491:Perennialism
3444:Metaphysical
3288:Antireligion
3163:Teleological
3086:Cosmological
3085:
3037:Baháʼí Faith
3002:Christianity
2961:Personal god
2796:
2759:
2750:
2738:. Retrieved
2734:the original
2723:
2713:December 10,
2711:. Retrieved
2697:
2655:. Retrieved
2645:
2626:
2617:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2596:
2587:
2567:
2563:
2557:
2549:
2521:
2517:
2511:
2500:. Retrieved
2493:the original
2488:
2478:
2456:(2): 65–70.
2453:
2449:
2443:
2434:
2428:
2403:
2399:
2393:
2386:
2366:
2361:
2354:
2345:
2336:
2326:
2314:. Retrieved
2310:the original
2299:
2290:
2278:. Retrieved
2273:
2263:
2252:. Retrieved
2242:
2233:
2224:
2214:
2207:
2187:
2180:
2168:. Retrieved
2164:the original
2159:
2149:
2124:
2120:
2110:
2085:
2081:
2068:
2047:
2022:
2018:
1993:. Retrieved
1988:
1959:
1920:
1916:
1906:
1896:
1877:
1847:
1838:
1805:
1799:
1787:. Retrieved
1782:
1772:
1758:
1750:
1745:
1737:
1729:
1721:
1712:
1704:
1695:
1686:
1665:
1657:
1653:
1639:
1631:
1627:
1614:
1606:
1602:
1593:
1584:
1577:
1561:
1552:
1544:
1543:Duncan, S.,
1539:
1528:. Retrieved
1523:
1514:
1505:
1496:
1485:. Retrieved
1481:
1472:
1455:
1446:
1438:
1434:
1429:
1421:
1417:
1412:
1403:
1401:Craig, WL.,
1397:
1378:
1368:
1357:. Retrieved
1350:the original
1345:
1341:
1325:
1306:
1298:
1289:
1266:
1260:
1241:
1224:
1212:. Retrieved
1207:
1147:Quinque viae
1074:
1067:
1054:Edward Feser
1011:
996:
993:per accidens
992:
988:
986:
982:
977:
971:
965:
961:
952:Paul Edwards
946:
932:follows from
924:
914:
910:
907:
888:
867:
847:a posteriori
845:
839:
820:
811:
796:
792:
780:
776:
772:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
742:
729:
725:
721:
713:
706:
704:
688:
676:
663:
642:
632:
630:
609:
593:
589:Robert Koons
586:
577:
576:
567:
563:
559:
553:
547:
545:
540:
536:
528:
516:
491:
479:
475:
468:
462:
453:
445:
423:
406:
404:
399:
388:
383:
373:
364:
356:
334:
329:
315:
307:
295:
281:
260:
254:
248:
245:primus motor
244:
230:
228:
221:
211:
202:
194:
156:Robert Koons
148:Contemporary
112:Neoplatonism
93:
86:
79:
74:
70:
66:
62:
34:
32:
29:
5166:Krishnology
5143:Soteriology
5098:Eschatology
5078:Christology
4943:Open theism
4899:Exotheology
4797:Zoroastrian
4760:By religion
4717:Eschatology
4672:Homoiousian
4625:Ahura Mazda
4403:Panentheism
4366:Hermeticism
4075:Antony Flew
4060:Peter Geach
3993:René Guénon
3940:Lev Shestov
3935:Rudolf Otto
3642:of religion
3481:Panentheism
3414:Inclusivism
3333:Exclusivism
3328:Esotericism
3298:Creationism
3278:Agnosticism
3246:Poor design
3241:Omnipotence
3168:Natural law
3143:Ontological
3096:Contingency
2946:Holy Spirit
2274:leaderu.com
2127:: 369–380.
1658:Monadologie
1422:Metaphysics
1420:VIII, 4–6;
1416:Aristotle,
1238:Copan, Paul
1172:Transtheism
1122:First cause
1112:Determinism
899:omnipotence
895:omniscience
781:implausible
738:first cause
695:modal logic
644:Duns Scotus
434:contingency
369:agent cause
342:philosopher
300:fixed stars
256:Metaphysics
160:John Lennox
96:first cause
5311:Categories
5251:Philosophy
5138:Sophiology
5118:Philosophy
5113:Messianism
5073:Paterology
4677:Hypostasis
4667:Homoousian
4498:theologies
4438:Theopanism
4423:Polytheism
4386:Monotheism
4361:Henotheism
4045:J L Mackie
4003:Karl Barth
3800:David Hume
3722:Maimonides
3707:Heraclitus
3496:Polytheism
3466:Nondualism
3454:Humanistic
3439:Naturalism
3429:Monotheism
3387:Henotheism
3382:Gnosticism
3313:Demonology
3196:747 gambit
3113:Experience
2951:Misotheism
2657:August 17,
2502:2010-06-01
2337:New Advent
2254:2012-09-02
2059:2310.02338
1530:2007-11-27
1487:2023-05-19
1359:2015-03-27
1184:References
1142:Psychology
1127:Infinitism
1046:North Pole
1026:dimensions
950:and later
948:David Hume
915:Prima Pars
856:David Hume
426:scholastic
288:Parmenides
144:Parmenides
89:(becoming)
5322:Causality
5128:Practical
5123:Political
5088:Cosmology
5045:Christian
4904:Holocaust
4894:Egotheism
4849:Goddesses
4844:Mormonism
4772:Christian
4725:Afterlife
4611:Sustainer
4418:Polydeism
4413:Pantheism
4398:Mysticism
4381:Monolatry
4376:Nontheism
4356:Dystheism
4145:Loyal Rue
3870:Karl Marx
3692:Gaudapada
3521:Shamanism
3486:Pantheism
3471:Nontheism
3449:Religious
3434:Mysticism
3407:Christian
3397:Religious
3348:Atheistic
3343:Christian
3226:Nonbelief
3211:Free will
3027:Mormonism
2851:Afterlife
2584:171007306
2470:189828318
2420:171007306
2276:. LeaderU
2039:170181468
1824:cite book
1464:1055-7660
1424:XII, 1–6.
1157:Semiotics
1152:Semantics
1097:Cosmogony
1050:membranes
852:inductive
842:causality
718:recursive
707:positive
470:necessary
450:necessity
438:Aristotle
361:existence
320:planetary
316:inspiring
277:efficient
269:atomist's
247:) in his
208:Aristotle
187:Aristotle
108:Aristotle
73:, or the
55:causation
5246:Kabbalah
5193:Prophets
5068:Glossary
5034:By faith
4997:Hinduism
4879:Demiurge
4869:in Islam
4829:Hinduism
4819:Buddhism
4811:Feminist
4767:Buddhist
4575:Absolute
4568:Concepts
4544:Hinduism
4539:Buddhism
4505:By faith
4469:and gods
4461:Divinity
4447:Concepts
4408:Pandeism
4309:Theology
4267:Category
4212:Religion
4202:Exegesis
3687:Boethius
3682:Averroes
3677:Avicenna
3659:medieval
3629:Theodicy
3476:Pandeism
3392:Humanism
3360:Thealogy
3303:Dharmism
3273:Acosmism
3265:Theology
3133:Morality
3128:Miracles
3007:Hinduism
2997:Buddhism
2956:Pandeism
2931:Demiurge
2899:Theodicy
2758:(2008).
2740:June 21,
2708:24950306
2625:(2017).
2589:regress.
2546:25953826
2538:11680525
2355:Synthese
2316:3 August
2280:1 August
2170:June 20,
2102:16923735
1995:11 March
1738:Analysis
1676:Archived
1660:(1714).
1570:Archived
1333:(1997).
1305:(eds.).
1240:(eds.).
1214:4 August
1082:Argument
1061:See also
891:theistic
869:a priori
785:Big Bang
594:in fieri
568:In fieri
560:In fieri
549:in fieri
541:in fieri
345:Avicenna
331:Plotinus
325:pantheon
213:The Laws
100:analysed
87:in fieri
59:universe
51:inferred
41:and the
5236:Aggadah
5184:Oneness
5176:Islamic
5058:Outline
5053:History
5012:Judaism
5007:Jainism
4963:Process
4938:Olelbis
4839:Judaism
4782:Islamic
4697:Trinity
4580:Brahman
4554:Sikhism
4549:Jainism
4522:Judaism
4474:Goddess
4238:more...
3971:postwar
3654:Ancient
3542:more...
3461:New Age
3402:Secular
3372:Fideism
3323:Dualism
3293:Atheism
3283:Animism
3189:Against
3032:Sikhism
3022:Judaism
3017:Jainism
2926:Brahman
2879:Miracle
2795:(ed.).
2141:2214081
1789:22 June
1520:"Islam"
1508:. 2021.
1418:Physics
1137:Present
1020:." The
734:vicious
578:In esse
564:in esse
555:in esse
537:In esse
430:Aquinas
424:In the
357:māhiyya
353:essence
339:Islamic
308:imitate
250:Physics
231:against
223:Timaeus
191:Raphael
174:History
80:in esse
49:can be
5274:Wiccan
5223:Jewish
5203:Angels
5133:Public
5103:Ethics
4792:Taoist
4787:Jewish
4747:Heaven
4604:God as
4334:Theism
4257:Portal
3531:Theism
3424:Monism
3158:Reason
3108:Desire
3103:Degree
3071:Beauty
2985:God in
2941:Egoism
2894:Spirit
2766:
2706:
2633:
2582:
2544:
2536:
2468:
2418:
2195:
2139:
2100:
2037:
1812:
1526:. 2007
1462:
1385:
1313:
1277:
1248:
997:per se
989:per se
901:, and
359:) and
284:cosmos
218:Cosmos
166:, and
102:to be
84:, and
69:, the
5261:Pagan
5153:Hindu
5002:Islam
4834:Islam
4777:Hindu
4740:Fitra
4590:Logos
4532:Islam
4481:Numen
4456:Deity
4351:Deism
4342:Forms
3526:Taoic
3308:Deism
3091:Kalam
3042:Wicca
3012:Islam
2861:Faith
2791:. In
2704:JSTOR
2580:S2CID
2542:S2CID
2496:(DOC)
2466:S2CID
2416:S2CID
2137:JSTOR
2098:S2CID
2078:(PDF)
2054:arXiv
2035:S2CID
1353:(PDF)
1338:(PDF)
1299:Kalam
1132:Logos
1092:Chaos
1030:space
712:. An
428:era,
384:Kalam
380:Kalam
365:wuǧūd
349:being
261:favor
204:Plato
183:Plato
65:, an
37:, in
4968:Tian
4751:Hell
4621:Good
4616:Time
4088:2010
4086:1990
4084:1970
3969:1920
3891:1900
3889:1880
3826:1850
3824:1800
3216:Hell
3206:Evil
3123:Love
2889:Soul
2764:ISBN
2742:2008
2715:2023
2659:2012
2631:ISBN
2534:PMID
2318:2016
2282:2021
2193:ISBN
2172:2008
1997:2021
1830:link
1810:ISBN
1791:2008
1609:2, 3
1460:ISSN
1383:ISBN
1311:ISBN
1275:ISBN
1246:ISBN
1216:2016
1034:time
1032:and
552:and
539:and
529:part
454:must
318:the
253:and
185:and
134:and
114:and
5188:God
5186:of
3656:and
3064:For
2865:or
2572:doi
2526:doi
2458:doi
2408:doi
2129:doi
2090:doi
2027:doi
1925:doi
1634:2,3
978:not
751:or
446:not
296:did
243:or
237:" (
193:'s
104:God
47:God
5313::
4985:in
4749:/
4627:,
2696:.
2688:;
2684:;
2680:;
2667:^
2586:.
2578:.
2568:10
2566:.
2548:.
2540:.
2532:.
2522:22
2520:.
2487:.
2464:.
2454:14
2452:.
2414:.
2404:10
2402:.
2385:,
2374:^
2353:,
2335:.
2272:.
2158:.
2135:.
2123:.
2119:.
2096:.
2086:93
2084:.
2080:.
2033:.
2023:28
2021:.
2017:.
2005:^
1987:.
1969:^
1937:^
1921:16
1919:.
1915:.
1886:^
1876:.
1856:^
1846:.
1826:}}
1822:{{
1781:.
1720:.
1703:.
1592:.
1576:,
1522:.
1504:.
1480:.
1458:.
1454:.
1439:ff
1346:34
1344:.
1340:.
1236:;
1206:.
1192:^
1004:.
897:,
747:,
582:SJ
306:,
170:.
162:,
158:,
154:,
146:.
91:.
33:A
4631:)
4623:(
4301:e
4294:t
4287:v
2829:e
2822:t
2815:v
2801:.
2772:.
2744:.
2717:.
2661:.
2639:.
2574::
2528::
2505:.
2472:.
2460::
2422:.
2410::
2339:.
2320:.
2284:.
2257:.
2174:.
2143:.
2131::
2125:2
2104:.
2092::
2062:.
2056::
2041:.
2029::
1999:.
1931:.
1927::
1850:.
1832:)
1818:.
1793:.
1766:.
1724:.
1707:.
1647:.
1622:.
1596:.
1533:.
1490:.
1466:.
1441:.
1391:.
1362:.
1319:.
1283:.
1254:.
1218:.
850:(
677:B
666:.
664:A
363:(
355:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.