Knowledge (XXG)

Francovich v Italy

Source 📝

256:
as it imposes burdens on individuals, Community law is also intended to give rise to rights which become part of their legal patrimony. Those rights arise not only where they are expressly granted by the Treaty but also by virtue of obligations which the Treaty imposes in a clearly defined manner both on individuals and on the Member States and the Community institutions (see the judgments in Case 26/62
42: 255:
31 It should be borne in mind at the outset that the EEC Treaty has created its own legal system, which is integrated into the legal systems of the Member States and which their courts are bound to apply. The subjects of that legal system are not only the Member States but also their nationals. Just
233:
for CDN Elettronica SnC, was owed 6 million Lira, and Mrs Bonifaci and 33 of her colleagues were owed 253 million Lira together after their company, Gaia Confezioni Srl, had gone bankrupt. The Directive was meant to be implemented by 1983, but five years later they had been paid nothing, as the
291:
34 The possibility of obtaining redress from the Member State is particularly indispensable where, as in this case, the full effectiveness of Community rules is subject to prior action on the part of the State and where, consequently, in the absence of such action, individuals cannot enforce before
137:
1. The provisions of Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer which determine the rights of employees must be interpreted as meaning that the persons
313:
Outcome cases: the court provides the referring national court ready-made specific solutions that almost provide no room for maneuverability. In these cases, the court will determine the compatibility of a national measure with European Union law or provide “as to how the correct interpretation of
246:
The European Court of Justice held that the Italian government had breached its obligations, and was liable to compensate the workers' loss resulting from the breach. The Court further held that the damages for such breaches should be available before national courts, and that to establish state
126:
Pretura di Bassano del Grappa, Sezione lavoro, ordinanza del 30 December 1989, Pretura di Bassano del Grappa, Sezione lavoro, sentenza del 9 July 1992 3 August 1992 (273/92), Pretura circondariale di Bassano del Grappa, sentenza del 9 December 1993 (162/93), Pretura circondariale di Bassano del
271:
32 Furthermore, it has been consistently held that the national courts whose task it is to apply the provisions of Community law in areas within their jurisdiction must ensure that those rules take full effect and must protect the rights which they confer on individuals (see in particular the
325:
It has also been shown that the principle of state liability has primarily served commercial interests in the Union. There are several obstacles to state liability for other groups of rights (environmental, social, consumer) including the inability to claim an ‘identifiable right’ under the
287:
33 The full effectiveness of Community rules would be impaired and the protection of the rights which they grant would be weakened if individuals were unable to obtain redress when their rights are infringed by a breach of Community law for which a Member State can be held responsible.
127:
Grappa, ordinanza del 21 March 1995 (839 RG 162/93), Pretura di Vicenza, Sezione lavoro, ordinanza del 9 July 1989 10 July 1989 (1186/89), Pretura circondariale di Vicenza, Sezione lavoro, ordinanza del 16 December 1993 (206/93 (1186/89))
317:
Guidance cases: the court provides guidelines and clarifications designed to inform the national court’s interpretation of the compatibility of national law with European Union law. The court does not find the liability for the national
295:
35 It follows that the principle whereby a State must be liable for loss and damage caused to individuals as a result of breaches of Community law for which the State can be held responsible is inherent in the system of the
251:, claimants must prove that the directive conferred specific rights on them, identifiable in its wording, and that there is a causal link between the state's failure to implement the directive and the loss suffered. 258: 225:
80/987/EC, EU Member States were expected to enact provisions in their national law to provide for a minimum level of insurance for employees who had wages unpaid if their employers went
791: 321:
Deference cases:  the court provides an abstract or theoretical ruling, leaving to the national court the determination of seriousness and compatibility. These cases appear less.
274: 359: 435: 473: 138:
concerned cannot enforce those rights against the State before the national courts where no implementing measures are adopted within the prescribed period;
305:
The court stipulated that national procedures should determine how each Member State's liability was to be enforced. In an analysis of 35 cases following
378: 330:
struggling to sue as the losses are spread over many claimants, and an inability to prove the loss for an individual (environmental pollution).
640: 352: 461: 449: 504: 309:
Takis Tridimas has shown that the European Court of Justice takes one of three approaches to resolving disputes of state liability:
345: 159: 390: 238:, arguing that it must pay damages to compensate for their losses instead, on account of a failure to implement the Directive. 222: 490: 141:
2. A Member State is required to make good loss and damage caused to individuals by failure to transpose Directive 80/987/EEC.
381: 567: 194: 537: 393: 417: 248: 202: 408: 197:
could be liable to pay compensation to individuals who suffered a loss by reason of the Member State's failure to
806: 796: 578: 509: 480: 190: 146: 46: 773: 92: 801: 618: 205:
into national law. This principle is sometimes known as the principle of state liability or "the rule in
741: 687: 82: 660:"Constitutional review of member state action: The virtues and vices of an incomplete jurisdiction" 583: 518: 198: 729: 679: 421: 210: 234:
company liquidators had informed them that no money was left. They brought a claim against the
593: 235: 725: 717: 671: 549: 522: 167: 154: 756: 702: 598: 526: 733: 553: 425: 785: 588: 563: 61: 264: 17: 314:
the EU requires the dispute to be resolved” thereby demonstrating the liability.
172: 280: 718:"Francovich Enforcement Analysed and Illustrated by German (and English) Law" 226: 41: 337: 675: 639:
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions,
630:
Francovich and Bonifaci v Republic of Italy (C-6, 9/90) I-5357, para. 40
722:
The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States' Compliance
230: 659: 292:
the national courts the rights conferred upon them by Community law.
66:
Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic.
680:
https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/9/3-4/737/657639#11379100
341: 375: 734:
https://academic.oup.com/book/26766/chapter/195669199#
275:
Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Simmenthal
247:
liability on the basis of the failure to implement a
643:, published 11 March 2007, accessed 15 November 2022 145: 131: 122: 114: 106: 98: 88: 78: 70: 60: 53: 34: 792:Court of Justice of the European Union case law 253: 437:McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment 353: 8: 775:Francovich and Bonifaci v Republic of Italy 664:International Journal of Constitutional Law 475:Regeling v Bedrijfsverg de Metaalnijverheid 360: 346: 338: 730:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746560.003.0008 278:ECR 629, paragraph 16, and Case C-213/89 27:Decision of the European Court of Justice 492:Mann v Secretary of State for Employment 610: 751: 750: 739: 697: 696: 685: 31: 379:Employer's Insolvency Convention 1992 7: 653: 651: 649: 619:European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 462:SS for Trade and Industry v Bottrill 189:(1991) C-6/90 was a decision of the 229:. Mr Francovich, who had worked in 658:Tridimas, Takis (1 October 2011). 450:Buchan v SS for Trade and Industry 102:Reference for a preliminary ruling 25: 621:, Schedule 1 accessed 8 July 2018 505:Robins v SS for Work and Pensions 778:(Cases C-6 and 9/90) ECR I-5375 538:Re Allders Department Stores Ltd 40: 391:Insolvency Protection Directive 223:Insolvency Protection Directive 1: 160:Gil Carlos RodrĂ­guez Iglesias 195:European Union Member States 284:ECR I-2433, paragraph 19). 823: 418:Employment Rights Act 1996 307:Francovich v Italy (1991), 579:United Kingdom labour law 560: 546: 534: 516: 501: 487: 470: 458: 446: 432: 415: 400: 388: 373: 272:judgments in Case 106/77 191:European Court of Justice 178: 165: 152: 136: 47:European Court of Justice 39: 368:Employees and insolvency 56:Decided 19 November 1991 54:Submitted 8 January 1990 716:Reich, Norbert (2017). 193:which established that 298: 115:Nationality of parties 641:Francovich principle 262:ECR 1 and Case 6/64 676:10.1093/icon/mor052 584:European labour law 519:Insolvency Act 1986 18:Francovich v. Italy 404:Francovich v Italy 211:European Union law 186:Francovich v Italy 123:Procedural history 93:ECLI:EU:C:1991:428 35:Francovich v Italy 749:External link in 695:External link in 594:Incidental effect 574: 573: 568:UK insolvency law 182: 181: 147:Court composition 16:(Redirected from 814: 807:Italian case law 797:1991 in case law 761: 760: 754: 753: 747: 745: 737: 713: 707: 706: 700: 699: 693: 691: 683: 670:(3–4): 737–756. 655: 644: 637: 631: 628: 622: 617:UK Legislation, 615: 550:Krasner v McMath 493: 476: 438: 362: 355: 348: 339: 259:Van Gend en Loos 168:Advocate General 155:Judge-Rapporteur 44: 32: 21: 822: 821: 817: 816: 815: 813: 812: 811: 782: 781: 770: 765: 764: 748: 738: 715: 714: 710: 694: 684: 657: 656: 647: 638: 634: 629: 625: 616: 612: 607: 599:Indirect effect 575: 570: 556: 542: 530: 512: 497: 491: 483: 474: 466: 454: 442: 436: 428: 411: 396: 384: 369: 366: 336: 303: 244: 219: 171: 158: 140: 139: 55: 49: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 820: 818: 810: 809: 804: 799: 794: 784: 783: 780: 779: 769: 768:External links 766: 763: 762: 708: 645: 632: 623: 609: 608: 606: 603: 602: 601: 596: 591: 586: 581: 572: 571: 561: 558: 557: 547: 544: 543: 535: 532: 531: 517: 514: 513: 502: 499: 498: 488: 485: 484: 471: 468: 467: 459: 456: 455: 447: 444: 443: 433: 430: 429: 416: 413: 412: 401: 398: 397: 389: 386: 385: 374: 371: 370: 367: 365: 364: 357: 350: 342: 335: 332: 323: 322: 319: 315: 302: 299: 243: 240: 218: 215: 180: 179: 176: 175: 163: 162: 150: 149: 143: 142: 134: 133: 129: 128: 124: 120: 119: 116: 112: 111: 108: 104: 103: 100: 96: 95: 90: 86: 85: 80: 76: 75: 72: 68: 67: 64: 62:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 819: 808: 805: 803: 802:1991 in Italy 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 789: 787: 777: 776: 772: 771: 767: 758: 743: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 712: 709: 704: 689: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 654: 652: 650: 646: 642: 636: 633: 627: 624: 620: 614: 611: 604: 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 589:Direct effect 587: 585: 582: 580: 577: 576: 569: 565: 564:UK labour law 559: 555: 554:EWCA Civ 1072 552: 551: 545: 540: 539: 533: 528: 524: 520: 515: 511: 507: 506: 500: 495: 494: 486: 482: 478: 477: 469: 464: 463: 457: 452: 451: 445: 440: 439: 431: 427: 423: 419: 414: 410: 406: 405: 399: 395: 392: 387: 383: 380: 377: 372: 363: 358: 356: 351: 349: 344: 343: 340: 333: 331: 329: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310: 308: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 283: 282: 277: 276: 269: 267: 266: 261: 260: 252: 250: 241: 239: 237: 236:Italian state 232: 228: 224: 216: 214: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 187: 177: 174: 170: 169: 164: 161: 157: 156: 151: 148: 144: 135: 130: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 94: 91: 87: 84: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 63: 59: 52: 48: 43: 38: 33: 30: 19: 774: 742:cite journal 732:– via 721: 711: 688:cite journal 678:– via 667: 663: 635: 626: 613: 548: 536: 503: 489: 472: 465:EWCA Civ 781 460: 448: 434: 403: 402: 327: 324: 306: 304: 294: 290: 286: 279: 273: 270: 265:Costa v ENEL 263: 257: 254: 245: 220: 206: 185: 184: 183: 166: 153: 29: 301:Enforcement 173:Jean Mischo 83:61990CJ0006 786:Categories 752:|via= 698:|via= 394:2008/94/EC 318:authority. 281:Factortame 268:ECR 585). 221:Under the 207:Francovich 110:Full court 529:, para 99 249:directive 227:insolvent 203:directive 199:transpose 99:Case type 510:C-278/05 496:IRLR 566 481:C-125/97 334:See also 326:judgment 242:Judgment 541:BCC 289 508:(2007) 479:(1999) 453:IRLR 80 441:ICR 549 426:182-190 422:166-170 407:(1990) 296:Treaty. 231:Vicenza 107:Chamber 79:CelexID 527:Sch B1 409:C-6/90 201:an EU 132:Ruling 74:C-6/90 605:Notes 523:176ZA 382:C 173 217:Facts 209:" in 118:Italy 757:help 703:help 566:and 562:see 525:and 424:and 89:ECLI 71:Case 726:doi 672:doi 420:ss 376:ILO 788:: 746:: 744:}} 740:{{ 724:. 720:. 692:: 690:}} 686:{{ 666:. 662:. 648:^ 521:s 213:. 759:) 755:( 736:. 728:: 705:) 701:( 682:. 674:: 668:9 361:e 354:t 347:v 328:, 20:)

Index

Francovich v. Italy

European Court of Justice
Full case name
61990CJ0006
ECLI:EU:C:1991:428
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
Gil Carlos RodrĂ­guez Iglesias
Advocate General
Jean Mischo
European Court of Justice
European Union Member States
transpose
directive
European Union law
Insolvency Protection Directive
insolvent
Vicenza
Italian state
directive
Van Gend en Loos
Costa v ENEL
Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Simmenthal
Factortame
v
t
e
ILO
Employer's Insolvency Convention 1992

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑