Knowledge

Garcia v. Google, Inc.

Source đź“ť

42: 270:("EFF") has criticized the court's decision for several reasons. First, "the Copyright Office expressly rejected effort to register a copyright," suggesting that her claim is "doubtful at best." Second, the EFF argues that the court's decision amounts to a "prior restraint of speech, something that should never happen when the claim is 'doubtful.'" Even worse, the EFF argues, the decision may signal that any party who has added "anything even remotely creative to a work" may have the right to receive a share in the profits of that work, and he or she may have the power to remove that work from circulation. 203:
likelihood that irreparable harm will result if the court does not grant the injunction, and the balance of the equity to the parties and the public interest in granting or denying relief. The court denied the application "because Garcia had delayed in bringing the action, had failed to demonstrate 'that the requested preliminary relief would prevent any alleged harm' and was unlikely to succeed on the merits because she'd granted Youssef an implied license to use her performance in the film."
1801: 1065: 141:. A casting call described the film as "an HD 24P historical Arabian Desert adventure film," and Garcia was ultimately cast to play a minor role, that of a mother of a young woman who had been promised in marriage to the movie's protagonist. Garcia participated in three and one-half days of shooting and was paid $ 500 for her work. 178:. While the protests began at the diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, unrest quickly spread to several other countries with significant Muslim populations, including Yemen, Greece, Sudan, Tunisia, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan. Garcia herself received death threats due to her involvement with the film. 277:, reiterates some of the EFF's concerns. He suggests that the Ninth Circuit's decision could lead to censorship, wherein a small contributor to a creative work can effectively close off public access to the work. He also argues that the decision undercuts the utilitarian purpose of copyright law. 235:
Additionally, the court determined that Garcia was not an "employee" for purposes of transferring her ownership interest in her performance under the Copyright Act. The court pointed out that the term "employee" refers "to a hired party in a conventional employer relationship." According to the
206:
In a declaration given by David Hardy, president of DMCA Solutions, YouTube's typical notice-and-counter-notice process is described. Hardy then shares his conversations with YouTube over the Innocence of Muslims video and characterizes YouTube's responses as purposeful delay tactics and feigning
243:. As part of that order, the court vacated its prior opinion, meaning that it can no longer be cited and is not binding on lower courts. The order has no effect on the injunction, meaning that Google still may not post the allegedly infringing portions of the film, at least for the time being. 227:
The Ninth Circuit held that Garcia was entitled to a preliminary injunction because she was likely to succeed on the merits of her copyright claim. The court determined that Garcia likely owned an independent, copyrightable interest in her own performance in the film. Specifically, the court
202:
The district court treated Garcia's application for a temporary restraining order as an application for a preliminary injunction. To succeed on a claim for preliminary injunction, Garcia had to show four factors: a likelihood that she would succeed on the merits of the copyright claim, the
236:
court, because "Youssef hired Garcia for a specific task, she only worked for three days and she claims she received no health or other traditional employment benefits" suggests that she was not an "employee" under the statute. Garcia never transferred her interest in writing, either.
974: 162:. He added the anti-Islamic content to the film by dubbing over the actors' lines without their knowledge. In particular, Youssef had partially dubbed one of Garcia's lines in order to have her character ask, "Is your Mohammed a child molester?" 166:
screened at the Vine Theater in Los Angeles, California and was uploaded to YouTube on July 1, 2012. By September, Youssef had translated the film into Arabic and drew the attention of the Arabic-speaking world.
2002: 228:
explained that Garcia's performance was "fixed" and that her "body language, facial expression and reactions to other actors and elements of a scene" constituted sufficient originality, both requirements of the
851: 401: 1837: 813: 263:
Prior to its reversal in an en banc opinion, the Ninth Circuit's decision sparked criticism from the legal community, as well as those who produce, distribute, or host copyrighted content.
195:. After Google declined, Garcia sued the company on September 26, 2012, in federal district court in California. She claimed that the film's continued existence on YouTube violated her 1865: 663: 1502: 836: 52: 1860: 1929: 1414: 1409: 997: 432: 112:, but, on appeal, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision, ordered YouTube to take down all copies of 539: 1830: 1364: 1570: 1424: 409: 744: 1823: 1533: 895: 1419: 1243: 1101: 1992: 1987: 843: 232:. Further, the court concluded that Garcia never intended to be a "joint author," so Youssef had no co-ownership of her performance in the film. 1739: 215:
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's decision denying Garcia a preliminary injunction, forcing Google to take down all copies of
199:
interest in her performance in the film. She applied to the court for a temporary restraining order to force Google to take down the film.
1982: 1436: 1248: 886: 174:, condemning all involved with the film to death. On September 11, 2012, a series of protests began in response to a YouTube trailer for 1369: 1268: 951: 911: 671: 1404: 927: 867: 859: 805: 524: 280:
Stefan M. Mentzer, a partner at White & Case, LLP, argues that the court misinterpreted certain provisions of the Copyright Act.
1846: 1771: 1519: 1431: 41: 565: 375: 1897: 1613: 192: 1913: 1527: 737: 1257: 789: 267: 1756: 1508: 903: 1485: 1094: 967: 590: 485: 345: 1997: 1692: 1068: 730: 1655: 1650: 292:, sued Google in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging copyright infringement. 323: 1876: 1704: 1497: 1473: 1463: 1132: 274: 219:
from YouTube. The Ninth Circuit also remanded the case for retrial on the merits of Garcia's copyright claim.
250:
opinion, the Ninth Circuit reversed the panel's decision, vacating the order for the preliminary injunction.
120:
opinion, the Ninth Circuit reversed the panel's decision, vacating the order for the preliminary injunction.
1698: 1087: 959: 797: 781: 635: 1310: 1048: 934: 109: 844:
United States v. Adobe Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corporation, Intuit, Inc., and Pixar
1734: 1633: 1458: 1332: 1253: 1032: 981: 919: 229: 134: 1961: 1871: 1761: 1645: 1550: 1450: 1040: 989: 402:"'It Makes Me Sick': Actress in Muhammed Movie Says She Was Deceived, Had No Idea It Was About Islam" 158: 104: 1746: 1672: 1618: 1514: 764: 510: 1677: 1127: 698: 433:"'Innocence of Muslims' producer's identity in question; actors say they were duped, overdubbed" 1687: 1628: 1381: 1263: 753: 1945: 1804: 94:, 786 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2015), is an ongoing dispute that arose when Cindy Lee Garcia sued 1786: 1776: 1565: 1295: 1207: 191:
Garcia asked Google to take down the film from YouTube on eight occasions pursuant to the
1751: 1682: 1608: 1582: 1577: 1358: 1195: 1189: 116:, and remanded the case to the district court for reconsideration. In May 2015, in an 1976: 1781: 1667: 1623: 1560: 1326: 1320: 1290: 1005: 1815: 108:, taken down from the site. A California district court denied Garcia's motion for 1880: 1640: 1555: 1352: 1315: 1212: 975:
Judgement of the German Federal Court of Justice on Google's autocomplete function
346:"The Garcia v. Google controversy and what it means for content owners and users" 1347: 1201: 1183: 680: 608: 462: 17: 1662: 1592: 1587: 1468: 1337: 1218: 1177: 1161: 1155: 710: 1342: 1305: 820: 196: 1480: 1376: 1300: 540:"Google Wins Copyright And Speech Case Over 'Innocence Of Muslims' Video" 1713: 1110: 566:"Controversial 'Innocence of Muslims' Ruling Reversed By Appeals Court" 247: 240: 117: 99: 486:"Does an actress own the copyright in her 5-second movie performance?" 239:
On November 12, 2014, the full Ninth Circuit voted to rehear the case
1718: 1388: 1223: 1121: 95: 722: 664:"Innocence of Muslims actor sues Google to block controversial film" 636:"Second actor sues Google over 'Innocence of Muslims' movie trailer" 328:, no. 12-57302 (9th Cir. Feb. 26, 2014). Accessed November 3, 2014. 171: 133:
In July 2011, Garcia auditioned for a film by writer and producer
852:
Umar Javeed, Sukarma Thapar, Aaqib Javeed vs. Google LLC and Ors.
137:, also known as Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, with the working title 1766: 1819: 1083: 726: 288:
In September 2014, Gaylor Flynn, another actor who appeared in
814:
Google, Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.
2003:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases
1079: 376:"Ex Post Incentives and IP in Garcia v. Google and Beyond" 679:
Willon, Phil; Keegan, Rebecca (September 13, 2012).
53:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1954: 1938: 1922: 1906: 1890: 1727: 1601: 1543: 1449: 1397: 1277: 1236: 1170: 1148: 1141: 1016: 943: 878: 829: 773: 79: 71: 66: 58: 48: 34: 1930:September 2012 southern Israel cross-border attack 528:, no. 12-57302 (9th Cir. Nov. 12, 2014)(order). 156:to create the controversial anti-Islamic film, 998:Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González 1831: 1095: 738: 273:Clark D. Asay, associate professor of law at 8: 703:, 12-57302; Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 211:U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 83:U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1838: 1824: 1816: 1534:Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. 1283: 1145: 1102: 1088: 1080: 896:Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. 745: 731: 723: 369: 367: 365: 363: 152:Ultimately, Youssef used the footage from 40: 31: 1503:Korean backdoor advertisement controversy 128: 594:, no. 12-57302 (9th Cir. May 18, 2015)( 511:"Declaration of David Hardy | PDF" 301: 493:Bar Association of Erie County Library 457: 455: 453: 340: 338: 336: 334: 319: 317: 315: 313: 311: 309: 307: 305: 7: 887:Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. 670:. September 15, 2014. Archived from 634:Chung, Andrew (September 15, 2014). 952:Rocky Mountain Bank v. Google, Inc. 912:Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. 928:Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 806:Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc. 374:Asay, Clark D. (August 20, 2014). 129:Garcia's participation in the film 102:, to have the controversial film, 25: 1898:September 2012 Camp Bastion raid 1800: 1799: 1614:CNN/YouTube presidential debates 1064: 1063: 193:Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1914:Sydney anti-Islam film protests 889:and A9.com Inc. and Google Inc. 681:"'Innocence of Muslims' unrest" 538:Chappell, Bill (May 18, 2015). 499:(6): 1 – via HEIN Online. 463:"'Innocence of Muslims' unrest" 98:and its video-sharing website, 1993:2015 in United States case law 1988:2014 in United States case law 790:Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc. 613:Electronic Frontier Foundation 564:Gardner, Eriq (May 18, 2015). 484:Downey, Anne (February 2015). 348:. Lexology.com. March 20, 2014 268:Electronic Frontier Foundation 1: 1528:Slovenian government incident 1509:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 904:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 719:oral argument (Dec. 15, 2014) 1486:Fantastic Adventures scandal 968:United States v. Google Inc. 170:An Egyptian cleric issued a 1983:2010s YouTube controversies 868:United States v. Google LLC 860:United States v. Google LLC 207:ignorance on copyright law 2019: 145:International reaction to 1856: 1795: 1286: 1117: 1059: 760: 39: 1877:Nakoula Basseley Nakoula 1244:Most-subscribed channels 275:Brigham Young University 1699:Internet Symphony No. 1 960:Hibnick v. Google, Inc. 798:Goddard v. Google, Inc. 782:Feldman v. Google, Inc. 609:"Garcia v. Google, Inc" 465:. Timelines.latimes.com 1492:Garcia v. Google, Inc. 1049:Gonzalez v. Google LLC 1025:Garcia v. Google, Inc. 935:Smartphone patent wars 570:The Hollywood Reporter 110:preliminary injunction 91:Garcia v. Google, Inc. 35:Garcia v. Google, Inc. 1757:Headquarters shooting 1735:Censorship of YouTube 1333:PewDiePie vs T-Series 1254:Multi-channel network 1033:Google LLC v Defteros 982:Joffe v. Google, Inc. 920:Field v. Google, Inc. 879:Intellectual property 715:, 12-57302; video of 230:Copyright Act of 1976 223:Ninth Circuit opinion 135:Mark Basseley Youssef 1962:2012 Benghazi attack 1872:Innocence of Muslims 1866:Response to protests 1849:Innocence of Muslims 1571:original programming 1522:Innocence of Muslims 1437:Most-disliked videos 1249:Most-viewed channels 1041:Epic Games v. Google 990:Mosley v SARL Google 687:. Los Angeles Times. 290:Innocence of Muslims 217:Innocence of Muslims 176:Innocence of Muslims 164:Innocence of Muslims 159:Innocence of Muslims 147:Innocence of Muslims 114:Innocence of Muslims 105:Innocence of Muslims 1772:YouTube downloaders 1747:Channel suspensions 1673:Project for Awesome 1498:Kohistan video case 1415:French music videos 1410:Arabic music videos 1186:(founder & CEO) 765:Criticism of Google 674:on October 8, 2014. 412:on October 23, 2014 380:Stanford Law Review 246:In May 2015, in an 1693:Symphony Orchestra 1678:Social in the City 1405:Most-viewed videos 1998:Google litigation 1970: 1969: 1813: 1812: 1629:KSI vs Logan Paul 1544:Apps and services 1445: 1444: 1432:Most-liked videos 1269:Original channels 1232: 1231: 1077: 1076: 754:Google litigation 705:Cases of Interest 87: 86: 16:(Redirected from 2010: 1946:Garcia v. Google 1840: 1833: 1826: 1817: 1803: 1802: 1474:Copyright strike 1464:Copyright issues 1425:Pakistani videos 1284: 1264:Official channel 1146: 1104: 1097: 1090: 1081: 1067: 1066: 747: 740: 733: 724: 712:Garcia v. Google 700:Garcia v. Google 688: 675: 648: 647: 645: 643: 631: 625: 624: 622: 620: 615:. March 25, 2014 605: 599: 591:Garcia v. Google 587: 581: 580: 578: 576: 561: 555: 554: 552: 550: 535: 529: 525:Garcia v. Google 521: 515: 514: 507: 501: 500: 490: 481: 475: 474: 472: 470: 459: 448: 447: 445: 443: 428: 422: 421: 419: 417: 408:. Archived from 397: 391: 390: 388: 386: 371: 358: 357: 355: 353: 342: 329: 325:Garcia v. Google 321: 44: 32: 21: 18:Garcia v. Google 2018: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2009: 2008: 2007: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1966: 1950: 1934: 1918: 1902: 1886: 1852: 1844: 1814: 1809: 1791: 1787:YouTube Theater 1777:YouTube Instant 1723: 1597: 1539: 1441: 1393: 1279: 1273: 1228: 1208:Susanne Daniels 1166: 1137: 1113: 1108: 1078: 1073: 1055: 1012: 939: 874: 825: 769: 756: 751: 695: 678: 662: 657: 652: 651: 641: 639: 633: 632: 628: 618: 616: 607: 606: 602: 588: 584: 574: 572: 563: 562: 558: 548: 546: 537: 536: 532: 522: 518: 509: 508: 504: 488: 483: 482: 478: 468: 466: 461: 460: 451: 441: 439: 430: 429: 425: 415: 413: 399: 398: 394: 384: 382: 373: 372: 361: 351: 349: 344: 343: 332: 322: 303: 298: 286: 284:Flynn v. Google 261: 256: 225: 213: 189: 184: 150: 131: 126: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2016: 2014: 2006: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1975: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1965: 1964: 1958: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1949: 1948: 1942: 1940: 1936: 1935: 1933: 1932: 1926: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1917: 1916: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1894: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1884: 1868: 1863: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1845: 1843: 1842: 1835: 1828: 1820: 1811: 1810: 1808: 1807: 1796: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1769: 1764: 1759: 1754: 1752:YouTube Select 1749: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1731: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1722: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1702: 1690: 1685: 1683:Streamy Awards 1680: 1675: 1670: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1643: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1626: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1596: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1547: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1537: 1530: 1525: 1517: 1512: 1505: 1500: 1495: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1471: 1461: 1455: 1453: 1447: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1440: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1412: 1401: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1367: 1359:YouTube Rewind 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1311:Creator Awards 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1274: 1272: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1251: 1246: 1240: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1210: 1205: 1199: 1196:Susan Wojcicki 1193: 1190:Salar Kamangar 1187: 1181: 1174: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1165: 1164: 1159: 1152: 1150: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1107: 1106: 1099: 1092: 1084: 1075: 1074: 1072: 1071: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1029: 1020: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1011: 1010: 1002: 994: 986: 978: 972: 964: 956: 947: 945: 941: 940: 938: 937: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 882: 880: 876: 875: 873: 872: 864: 856: 848: 840: 839:(2010–present) 837:European Union 833: 831: 827: 826: 824: 823: 818: 810: 802: 794: 786: 777: 775: 771: 770: 768: 767: 761: 758: 757: 752: 750: 749: 742: 735: 727: 721: 720: 708: 694: 693:External links 691: 690: 689: 676: 660: 656: 653: 650: 649: 626: 600: 582: 556: 530: 516: 502: 476: 449: 431:Hollie McKay. 423: 392: 359: 330: 300: 299: 297: 294: 285: 282: 260: 257: 255: 252: 224: 221: 212: 209: 188: 187:District Court 185: 183: 180: 154:Desert Warrior 149: 143: 139:Desert Warrior 130: 127: 125: 122: 85: 84: 81: 77: 76: 75:District Court 73: 69: 68: 64: 63: 60: 56: 55: 50: 46: 45: 37: 36: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2015: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1978: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1957: 1953: 1947: 1944: 1943: 1941: 1939:United States 1937: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1925: 1921: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1909: 1905: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1893: 1889: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1847:Reactions to 1841: 1836: 1834: 1829: 1827: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1806: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1782:YouTube Space 1780: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1770: 1768: 1765: 1763: 1760: 1758: 1755: 1753: 1750: 1748: 1745: 1741: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1730: 1726: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1668:Playlist Live 1666: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1627: 1625: 1624:Creator Clash 1622: 1620: 1617: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1604: 1600: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1524: 1523: 1520:Reactions to 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1504: 1501: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1452: 1448: 1438: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1420:Indian videos 1418: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1400: 1396: 1390: 1387: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1327:Me at the zoo 1324: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1276: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1173: 1169: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1134: 1133:Social impact 1131: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1105: 1100: 1098: 1093: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1070: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1019: 1015: 1008: 1007: 1006:Frank v. Gaos 1003: 1000: 999: 995: 992: 991: 987: 984: 983: 979: 976: 973: 970: 969: 965: 962: 961: 957: 954: 953: 949: 948: 946: 942: 936: 933: 930: 929: 925: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 888: 884: 883: 881: 877: 870: 869: 865: 862: 861: 857: 854: 853: 849: 846: 845: 841: 838: 835: 834: 832: 828: 822: 819: 816: 815: 811: 808: 807: 803: 800: 799: 795: 792: 791: 787: 784: 783: 779: 778: 776: 772: 766: 763: 762: 759: 755: 748: 743: 741: 736: 734: 729: 728: 725: 718: 714: 713: 709: 706: 702: 701: 697: 696: 692: 686: 682: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 659: 658: 655:Other sources 654: 637: 630: 627: 614: 610: 604: 601: 597: 593: 592: 586: 583: 571: 567: 560: 557: 545: 541: 534: 531: 527: 526: 520: 517: 512: 506: 503: 498: 494: 487: 480: 477: 464: 458: 456: 454: 450: 438: 434: 427: 424: 411: 407: 403: 400:Adrian Chen. 396: 393: 381: 377: 370: 368: 366: 364: 360: 347: 341: 339: 337: 335: 331: 327: 326: 320: 318: 316: 314: 312: 310: 308: 306: 302: 295: 293: 291: 283: 281: 278: 276: 271: 269: 264: 258: 253: 251: 249: 244: 242: 237: 233: 231: 222: 220: 218: 210: 208: 204: 200: 198: 194: 186: 181: 179: 177: 173: 168: 165: 161: 160: 155: 148: 144: 142: 140: 136: 123: 121: 119: 115: 111: 107: 106: 101: 97: 93: 92: 82: 78: 74: 72:Appealed from 70: 65: 61: 57: 54: 51: 47: 43: 38: 33: 30: 19: 1881:Morris Sadek 1870: 1848: 1762:In education 1705: 1697: 1646:Music Awards 1551:BrandConnect 1532: 1521: 1507: 1491: 1490: 1357: 1353:YouTube poop 1316:Draw My Life 1213:Robert Kyncl 1047: 1039: 1031: 1024: 1023: 1004: 996: 988: 980: 966: 958: 950: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 885: 866: 858: 850: 842: 812: 804: 796: 788: 780: 716: 711: 704: 699: 684: 672:the original 668:The Guardian 667: 640:. Retrieved 629: 617:. Retrieved 612: 603: 595: 589: 585: 573:. Retrieved 569: 559: 547:. Retrieved 543: 533: 523: 519: 505: 496: 492: 479: 467:. Retrieved 440:. Retrieved 436: 426: 414:. Retrieved 410:the original 405: 395: 383:. Retrieved 379: 350:. Retrieved 324: 289: 287: 279: 272: 265: 262: 245: 238: 234: 226: 216: 214: 205: 201: 190: 175: 169: 163: 157: 153: 151: 146: 138: 132: 113: 103: 90: 89: 88: 67:Case history 62:786 F.3d 733 29: 1891:Afghanistan 1619:Comedy Week 1348:Viral video 1278:Culture and 1202:Jawed Karim 1184:Chad Hurley 774:Advertising 619:November 3, 469:November 3, 442:November 3, 416:November 3, 385:November 3, 352:November 3, 80:Appealed to 1977:Categories 1861:Chronology 1706:Mothership 1663:Open Sauce 1469:Content ID 1459:Censorship 1338:Reply girl 1321:Let's Play 1219:Udi Manber 1178:Steve Chen 1162:Lyor Cohen 1156:Neal Mohan 642:August 19, 296:References 124:Background 27:Legal case 1907:Australia 1688:Space Lab 1451:Criticism 1343:StudyTube 1306:BreadTube 1204:(founder) 1180:(founder) 830:Antitrust 821:Jedi Blue 638:. Reuters 259:Criticism 254:Reactions 197:copyright 1805:Category 1481:Elsagate 1377:YouTuber 1301:BookTube 1237:Channels 1124:(parent) 1069:Category 685:Timeline 437:Fox News 59:Citation 1740:Germany 1728:Related 1714:Tubecon 1634:rematch 1566:Premium 1515:Privacy 1291:Apology 1149:Current 1128:History 1111:YouTube 944:Privacy 717:en banc 596:en banc 575:May 18, 549:May 18, 248:en banc 241:en banc 182:Lawsuit 118:en banc 100:YouTube 1923:Israel 1719:VidCon 1609:Awards 1602:Events 1583:Studio 1578:Shorts 1389:VTuber 1296:Beauty 1280:videos 1224:Yu Pan 1171:Former 1142:People 1122:Google 1052:(2022) 1044:(2021) 1036:(2020) 1028:(2015) 1009:(2019) 1001:(2014) 993:(2013) 985:(2013) 977:(2013) 971:(2012) 963:(2010) 955:(2009) 931:(2021) 923:(2016) 915:(2015) 907:(2015) 899:(2010) 891:(2007) 871:(2023) 863:(2020) 855:(2019) 847:(2011) 817:(2017) 809:(2012) 801:(2009) 793:(2009) 785:(2007) 406:Gawker 96:Google 1955:Libya 1561:Music 1398:Lists 1215:(CBO) 1198:(CEO) 1192:(CEO) 1158:(CEO) 1017:Other 489:(PDF) 172:fatwa 49:Court 1767:Vevo 1656:2015 1651:2013 1641:Live 1556:Kids 1382:list 1370:2019 1365:2018 1258:list 707:page 644:2015 621:2014 577:2015 551:2015 471:2014 444:2014 418:2014 387:2014 354:2014 266:The 544:NPR 1979:: 1879:, 1593:VR 1588:TV 683:. 666:. 611:. 598:). 568:. 542:. 497:54 495:. 491:. 452:^ 435:. 404:. 378:. 362:^ 333:^ 304:^ 1883:) 1875:( 1839:e 1832:t 1825:v 1329:" 1325:" 1260:) 1256:( 1103:e 1096:t 1089:v 746:e 739:t 732:v 646:. 623:. 579:. 553:. 513:. 473:. 446:. 420:. 389:. 356:. 20:)

Index

Garcia v. Google

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Google
YouTube
Innocence of Muslims
preliminary injunction
en banc
Mark Basseley Youssef
Innocence of Muslims
fatwa
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
copyright
Copyright Act of 1976
en banc
en banc
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Brigham Young University








Garcia v. Google


Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑