Generalized exchange

2127:

propose a strategy to solve the social dilemma aspect of generalized exchange, Yamagishi and Cook (1993) analyzed the effect of network structures on group members’ decisions. Relying on Ekeh’s (1974) approach, they distinguish two forms of generalized exchange as "group-generalized" and "network-generalized". In the first type, group members pool their resources and then receive benefits that are generated by pooling. In the second, each member provides resources to another member in the network who does not return benefits directly to the provider, but the provider receives benefits from some other member in the network. They basically claim that group-generalized exchange involves free rider problem as it is rational for any member to receive resources from pool without contributing. On the other hand, network-generalized exchange limits the occurrence of this problem as it is easier to detect free riding member and punish him/her by withholding resources until s/he starts to give. The laboratory experiments supported these predictions and they showed that network-generalized exchange promotes a higher level of participation (or cooperation) that group-generalized exchange structure. They also show that trust is an important factor for the survival of both systems and has a stronger effect on cooperation in the network-generalized structure than in the group-generalized structure.

1926:

same authors also show in their simulation study that strategy of rewarding reputation produces an evolutionary stable system of generalized reciprocity. Same idea is echoed by economic experiments where the rewarding of reputation is shown to yield generalized reciprocity. Individuals with reputations for helpfulness are more likely to get helped in contrast to those individuals without such reputation. Real-life examples show that in situations where reputations for helpfulness are rewarded, individuals are prone to engaging in helping others so that they will in return be rewarded and helped in the future. Incentive here is to be helped in the future – which is why individuals engage in building reputation. Experimental research on rewarding reputation also shows that reputations in organizations too are built with such incentives, and through consistent demonstration of "distinctive and salient behaviors on repeated occasions, or over time". Consequences for such actions are the following: good reputation results in more autonomy, power, and career success.

2186:

behaviors in a group of MBA students. Takahashi (2000) provided several places where generalized exchange can be observed in real life. Aiding a stranded driver alongside a road speaks to a societal-level feeling of duty to help others based on past experience or future expectation of needing help. Such a duty may also serve as the motivation for donating blood to unknown or indiscriminate receivers. Academically, the reviewers of journal articles also do so without payment in order to contribute to the system of publication and the knowledge that others will do so, or have already done so, for their papers. In addition to qualitative and ethnographic research, scholars have also studied generalized exchange through targeted lab experiments as well as programmed simulations. Generalized exchange has further studied through real life experiences, such as participation in public good conservation programs when one is recognized for doing so as opposed to when one’s name remains anonymous.

1905:. Individuals donate blood and organs at some personal cost with no direct benefits. When contributions are also rewarded, then contributing and cooperation becomes more attractive regardless of decisions of others. There are incentives to motivate sharing knowledge and helping others in organizations such as, formal participation quotas, making helping and giving an enforceable requirement with guaranteed rewards. Such incentives, do not specify who helps who – that is more discretionary. Individuals are free to choose who to help, and these choices can vary from helping only those that have helped an individual in the past (direct reciprocity), or to help those that have helped others and not helping those that have not helped. Incentives have been successful as an economic solution to free-riding, because they offer additional motivations that make cooperation rational. 2071:, believe the exchange is more of the solidarity in maintaining a well-functioned society than that for socially constrained individuals’ own needs. The society is believed to be an organism and all parts function together for the stability of the organism. Individuals work for the society and, reciprocally, they receive, say, philanthropic, materialistic, and social return from the society. It is similar to the modern society described by sociologists above, but the point here is that the solidarity is the cause of individual activities, which means individuals’ activities are dominated by the idea of solidarity, while sociologists’ modern society reaches solidarity as a result of individual’s self-oriented activities, where the solidarity is observed after selfish individuals focus on their own interests. 2143: 2160: 2055:

sociologically but meanwhile depend upon each other for their own well-being. The generalized exchange is hence more complicated as a result of longer chain in the cycle and perhaps temporal expansion. Different from a primitive society with a low level of role specialization, modern society is endowed with high specialization that emphasizes the searching process of the correct one when an exchange relation starts. When this searching fails finding a legitimate counterpart, this emerged exchange relation may die before birth. Therefore, the mechanism of organic solidarity is more complicated as the emergence, transmission, driving mechanism and the end point need careful reviews.

2046:, reciprocity may be accompanied by an enhanced status or reputation while the sole intentionality for such exchange is survival. Generalized exchange theory believes that there is a social consensus out of commonly shared value or lifestyle that exchange does not require an immediate reciprocity but promise another activity, which, after several iterations, closes the cycle. Another important presumption in mechanical solidarity is the low level of role specialization where an individual may ask a random one, not necessary an expert, for help and this random one is capable of providing expected service. 2173:

recipients whose behaviors satisfy their own criteria of fairness which would make pure-generalized exchange possible. He showed that this argument can hold in two evolutionary experiments, in particular, pure-generalized exchange can emerge even in a society in which members have different standards of fairness. Thus, altruism and a collective sense of fairness are no longer required in such a setting. Why self-interested actors give resources unilaterally has been interpreted with the possibility that this action increases profits by participation in exchange.

2139:

strategy on the possibility of cooperation reduces. In summary, these studies show that for a generalized exchange system to emerge and survive, a fixed form of network that consists of unidirectional paths is required. When this is available, adapting downward tit-for-tat strategy is profitable for all members and free riding is not possible. However, according to Takahashi (2000), the requirement of a fixed network structure is a major limitation since many of real world generalized exchange systems do not represent a simple closed chain of resource giving.

2131: 33: 1974:

reciprocate by cooperating as well. In addition, when contributions are observable, individuals can also signal their commitment by making small contributions without taking too much risk at once. Observing cooperative behavior also imposes obligation on an individual to also cooperate. Decisions to cooperate become more impersonal. Individuals can experience at least a minimal amount of satisfaction from being a cooperator because they feel like they are part of a larger group and organization.

1893:

the process forming a chain reaction. For generalized exchange to emerge, individuals must overcome the temptation to receive without contributing and instead in engage in sharing (cooperative) behavior. Once the sharing begins, the overall collective good can increase as more individuals contribute more goods (with high jointness of supply). As group size grows in an organization, individual information preferences are more likely to be met through diversity.

2042:

makes the solidarity mechanical as the exchange appears only when someone needs others, which may fall into exchange theory, with reciprocity in the form of status or reputation, as well as generalized exchange theory, where, out of expectation from the homogeneous group, reciprocity starts from the recipient helping a third and ends as the cycle is closed. That is to say, exchange theory argues that in a

2156:

where each actor gives resources to recipient(s) that s/he chooses unilaterally. However, this model also comes with a limitation; the necessity of a criterion that represents a collective sense of fairness among the members. By easing the limitations caused by the models described above, Takahashi (2000) proposed a more general solution to the free rider problem. This new model is summarized below.

829: 2105:

discussed ideas. However, these approaches do not guarantee the maintenance of exchange system, since compliance is facilitated by monitoring which does not exist in most cases. Subsequent social theorists proposed more feasible solutions that prevent free rider problem in generalized exchange systems. These solutions are described below by using the terminology adapted from Takahashi (2000).

2092:

powerful than restricted forms of exchange in generating morality, promoting mutual trust and solidarity among the participants. This view, however, was found to be too optimistic or problematic by later scholars, given that it ignores the social dilemmas created by the exchange structure. Because generalized exchange paves the way for exploitation by rational self-interested members, thus a

1990:, as direct exchanges that are not observed by others cannot possibly increase the standing of an individual to an entire group except through piecemeal methods such as gossip. Through observation, it becomes clearer to a group who gives or reciprocates and who does not; in this way good actions can be rewarded or encouraged, and bad actions can be sanctioned through refusal to give. 1700:(1922). In chain-generalized exchange, benefits flow in one direction in a circle of giving that eventually returns benefit to the giver. In direct exchange, actors instead engage in individual actions that benefit another. Reciprocal exchanges evolve gradually, as beneficial acts prompt reciprocal benefits, in a series of sequentially contingent, individual acts. 1812:

counterparties. Behaviors can be advice-giving, assistance, help, and are not subject to negotiation. Moreover, there is no knowledge whether or when or to what extent the other will reciprocate. Reciprocal transactions are distinct from pure economic exchanges and are typical in many interpersonal relationships where norms curtail the extent of explicit

893: 1739:

structure. According to Takahashi (2000), this is called "pure generalized" exchange. In this form, there is no fixed structure of giving. A might give to B on one occasion and to C on a different occasion. The structure of indirect reciprocity affects the solidarity in comparison with forms of exchange with direct reciprocity.

1914:

contributions. This makes giving and receiving social approval to have an influence on behavior. Individuals may cooperate (or share) because they care about receiving social approval and/or because they want to give social approval to others' contributions. Social approval is a combination of these two processes.

1892:

Structure of reciprocity can affect exchange in a more fundamental way, through its implications on actors’ incentives. Generalized reciprocity is a way of "organizing" an ongoing process of "interlocked behaviors" where one person’s behavior depends on another’s, whose is also depended on another’s,

1802:

In such exchange, actors together arrange and negotiate the terms of an agreement that benefits both parties, either equally or unequally. This is a joint decision process, an explicit bargaining. Both sides of the exchange are agreed upon at the same time, and the benefits for both exchange partners

2185:

These early studies have provoked the study of reciprocity and exchange in modern settings as well. For example, with technology comes exchange through information sharing in large, anonymous online communities of software developers. Even within academia, exchange has been studied through prosocial

2041:

is associated with pre-modern society, where individuals are homogeneous and the cohesion arises mainly from shared values, lifestyles and work. Kinship connects individuals inside the society hence the exchange exists solely for survival purpose because of the low level of role specialization. This

1925:

is regarded as an incentive in generalized reciprocity. Evolutionary theorists Nowak and Sigmund (1998) regard reputation a person’s image. This, in organizations, is named as "professional image", namely, others’ perceptions of individuals within organizations – but with a focus on helpfulness. The

1729:

requires information about the broader network (e.g., what has an actor A done for the others?). When collective organizations are large, this greater informational complexity of indirect reciprocity processes may moderate its effects. Experimental evidence shows that people respond strategically to

1720:

exchanges, we observe reduced emotional tension between the partners, a credit mentality, collective orientation and high levels of solidarity and trust. Indirect reciprocity occurs when an actor who provides benefits to another is subsequently helped by a third party. Indirect reciprocity is deeply

1653:

in which a desired outcome that is sought by an individual is not dependent on the resources provided by that individual. It is assumed to be a fundamental social mechanism that stabilizes relations in society by unilateral resource giving in which one's giving is not necessarily reciprocated by the

2138:

In another study, biologists Boyd and Richerson (1989) presented a model of evolution of indirect reciprocity and supported the idea that downward tit-for-tat strategy helps sustaining network-generalized exchange structures. They also claim that as the group size increases, positive effect of this

2091:

The unilateral character of generalized exchange that lacks one-to-one correspondence between what two parties directly give to and take from one another, distinguishes it from direct or restricted exchange. Ekeh (1974), a pioneer scholar in exchange theory, argues that generalized exchange is more

2011:

One hypothesized outcome of exchange processes is social solidarity. Through continued exchange between many different members of a group, and the continuous attempt to sanction and eliminate self-serving behavior, a group can become tightly-connected to the point that an individual identifies with

1691:

which provides guidance to both parties: takers are obliged to be givers. In direct dyadic exchange, the norm of reciprocity insists that takers give gifts to those who gave to them. Generalized exchange, also, insists that takers give, but to somebody else. The recipient is not defined and creates

1964:

Future-oriented behavior deals with the tendency for individuals to modify their behavior based on what they believe will happen in the future. Such behavior shares a similar logic to the game-theoretical approach to conditional cooperation. Individuals plan strategically their actions in terms of

1929:

Rewarding reputation is more time contingent. It is taxing for individuals to keep track of what everyone else does and monitor whose rate of helping is higher. This makes rewarding reputation tied to the recency of helpfulness. Individuals are found to make decisions based on recent reputation of

1738:

In generalized exchange, one actor gives benefits to another, and receives from another, but not from the same actor. We have a context of a chain-generalized system of exchange where A, B, and C are the connected parties. They may also be a part of a larger, more diffused network, with no defined

2181:

Exchange processes have been studied in a variety of empirical contexts. Much of the beginning of generalized exchange work revolved around tribal settings. For example, Malinowski’s Trobriand Island research serves as a foundational work for the study of exchange. The classic example of the Kula

2155:

Takahashi and Yamagishi proposed pure-generalized exchange as a situation where there is no fixed structure. It is regarded as more general, flexible and less restricted compared to previous models. In essence, pure-generalized exchange is network-generalized exchange with a choice of recipients,

1997:

process in the sense that it is not always carried out or perceived correctly. Individuals in groups can hold faulty perceptions of other actors which will lead them to take sanctioning action; this can also in turn lead to a lowering of the standing of that individual, if the group perceives the

1942:

Reputational concerns were found to be the driving force behind the effect of observability. Moreover, this effect was substantially stronger in settings where individuals were more likely to have future interactions with those who observed them and when participation was framed as a public good.

1839:

In theory, all three forms of exchange – indirect, direct negotiated, and direct reciprocal – differ from one another on a set of dimensions that potentially affect the development of social solidarity. These dimensions comprise the structure of reciprocity in social exchange. Theory argues

1811:

In such exchange, actors engage in actions that benefit one another. Actors' contributions to the exchange are not ex-ante negotiated. Actors initiate exchanges without knowing whether their actions will be reciprocated ex-post. Such contributions are performed separately and are not known to the

2172:

The new model proposed by Takahashi (2000), solved the free rider problem in generalized exchange by imposing particular social structures as little as possible. He adapted pure-generalized exchange situation with a novel strategy; fairness-based selective giving. In this strategy, actors select

1913:

Individuals may gain some intrinsic satisfaction from the popularity of their own contribution in the form of psychological efficacy, causing an individual to want to share more in the future. Additionally, individuals may participate in giving social approval by rating the popularity of other's

2126:

by promoting mutual cooperation between two actors. This strategy has been adapted to bilateral and network relations, and in both cases the strategy works only in restricted – rather than generalized – exchange, because it involves bilateral resource giving in either situation. In an effort to

2082:

exchange on some island and concludes that individuals participate in the ritual or ceremony out of their own needs, where they feel satisfied as a part of the society. This could also be interpreted religiously as individuals hold the society above their social roles hence they actively become

2054:

in modern society differs from the above-mentioned mechanical one. Modern society steps out of small and kinship-based town and integrates heterogeneous individuals that vary in their education, social class, religions, nations and races. Individuals stay distant from others psychologically and

1982:

Exchange, generalized or otherwise, is an inherently social construct. Social dynamics set the stage for an exchange to occur, between whom the exchange occurs, and what will happen after the exchange occurs. For example, exchange has been shown to have effects on an individual's reputation and

1938:

for example, uses a peer-to-peer bonus system that empowers employees to express gratitude and reward helpful behavior with token payments. Additionally, they use paying it forward incentive – meaning, those individuals that receive such bonuses, are given additional funds that may only be paid

1933:

To encourage reciprocity and incentivize individuals to engage in such prosocial behavior, organizations are shown to enforce norms of asking for help, giving help, and reciprocating help by organizing meetings and informal practices. Supervisors are also encouraged to use symbolic or financial

1734:

and norm enforcement. But another explanation may lie in reputational concerns. In other words, because so much of human behavior is based on the reputational advantages and opportunities, evolutionary theorists posit that the foundations of human morality are rooted in indirect reciprocity and

1973:

In reactive behavior, individuals tend to orient themselves towards the average behavior of other group members. Such behavior is closely tied to the principle of reciprocity. When individuals can see the overall cooperation level of the participants, they can stimulate a normative response to

1712:, each actor is depended not on a single other, as in direct forms of exchange, but on all actors who contribute to maintaining the collective system. Generalized exchange according to this logic, is a common feature of business organizations, neighborhoods, and the vast and growing network of 1859:

Corresponds to the basic distinction between direct (restricted) and indirect (generalized) forms of exchange discussed above. Direct vs indirect reciprocity also implies two related structural differences: whether exchange is dyadic (2-party) or collective (3+), and whether or not actors are

1781:

forms of direct exchange. Along these lines, Yamagishi and Cook(1993) and Takahashi(2000) note that emphasis on collective aspects of generalized exchange neglects elements such as: the high risk of the structure, the potential for those who fail to give to disrupt the entire system, and the

2104:

Despite the risk of free riding, early exchange theorists proposed several explanations to why such exchange systems exist. Among others, altruistic motivation of members, existence of collective norms and incentives that regulates the behaviour of returning resources to any member, are most

1803:

are easily identified as paired contributions that form a discrete transaction. There agreements are strictly binding and produce the benefits agreed upon. Most economic exchanges (excluding fixed-price trades) as well as many other social exchanges fall under this category.

1670:

occur within structures of mutual dependence, that is, structures in which actors are mutually, or reciprocally dependent on one another for valued outcomes. A structure of mutual or reciprocal dependence is defining characteristic of all social relations based on exchange.

2002:

on taking a certain action and failing to do so either through human error (e.g. forgetfulness) or due to circumstances that prevent them from doing so. For these reasons, there will always be a certain degree of error in the way that exchange systems work.

1654:

recipient, but by a third party. Thus, in contrast to direct or restricted exchange or reciprocity, in which parties exchange resources with each other, generalized exchange naturally involves more than two parties. Examples of generalized exchange include;

2182:

ring showed a system of exchange formed cyclically, where a giver would receive after a product given had gone through a full circle of receivers. Similar tribal research includes the inhabitants of Groote Eylandt, and matrilineal cross-cousin marriages.

1730:

the presence of others, cooperating at much higher levels when reputational benefits and possibilities or indirect reciprocity exist. Individuals have a tendency to reward givers and penalize non-givers - which is often explained from the perspectives of

1876:

Unilateral – each actor’s outcomes are contingent solely on another’s individual actions, and actors can initiate exchanges that are not reciprocated (and vice versa). Timing of reciprocity can be delayed in both reciprocal and generalized

1930:

others rather than their long-term reputation. The reward system of reciprocity is based on "what have you don’t for us lately?!" and the less recent one’s deeds are, the less likely it is for these individuals to receive help in return.

1824:

Negotiated and reciprocal exchanges create different structural relations between actors' behaviors and between their outcomes. Both forms of transactions alter the risk inherent in relations of mutual dependence, but in different ways.

1692:

opportunities of exploitation if actors explicitly reject the guiding norm of reciprocity. The purest form of indirect, generalized exchange, is the chain-generalized form, first documented by the classical anthropologists:

1939:

forward to recognize a third employee. To encourage knowledge exchange, large organizations employ knowledge-sharing communities in which they post and respond to requests for help around work-related problems.

2634:

Yoeli, Erez, Moshe Hoffman, David G. Rand, and Martin A. Nowak. 2013. “Powering Up with Indirect Reciprocity in a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(Supplement

2888:

Cook, Karen S., Richard M. Emerson, Mary R. Gillmore, and Toshio Yamagishi. 1983. "The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results." American Journal of Sociology 89: 275-305

1772:

An American sociologist Richard Marc Emerson (1981) further distinguished between two forms of transactions in direct exchange relations: negotiated and reciprocal. There exists a clear distinction between

1955:

situation. From a game-theoretical perspective, there is no strategic advantage to matching one's cooperation level to the rest of the group when others are already cooperating at a relatively high level.

1880:

When exchanges are negotiated, we have joint action effects, meaning, flow of benefits are always bilateral and each transaction produces an agreement that provides benefits (equal or unequal) for both

1901:

Individuals should be encouraged to make altruistic contribution to a collective good for generalized exchange to emerge. Empirical studies show that altruistic behavior is a natural aspect of

3417:

Kurzban, R., K. McCabe, V L. Smith, and B. J. Wilson. 2001. "Incremental Commitment and Reciprocity in a Real-Time Public Goods Game." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27:1662-1673

2924:

Lawler, Edward J. 1986. "Bilateral Deterrence and conflict Spiral: A Theoretical Analysis." Pp. 107-30 in Advances in Group Processes. Vol. 3, edited by Edward J. Lawler. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

3215:

Zinko R, Ferris GR, Humphrey SE, Meyer CJ, Aime F (2012). "Personal reputation in organizations: Two-study constructive replication and extension of antecedents and consequences".

2083:

involved in the ceremony and reciprocally benefit psychologically and socially from being a part of the holiness, which, in a way, agrees with the idea of solidarity as the cause.

1747:

In forms of exchange with direct reciprocity, two actors exchange resources with one another. This means, A provides value to B, and B to A. B's reciprocation of A's giving is

2906:

Gillmore, Mary Rogers. 1987. "Implications of General- ized versus Restricted Exchange." Pp. 170-89 in Social Exchange Theory, edited by Karen S. Cook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

2625:

Baker, Wayne E., and Nathaniel Bulkley. 2014. “Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity.” Organization Science 25(5):1493–1510.

3387:

Fischbacher, Urs, Simon Gachter, and Ernst Fehr. 2001. "Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence From a Public Goods Experiment," Economics Letters 71:397-404.

3102:

Oliver, Pamela E. and Gerald Marwell. 1988. "The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II." American Sociological Review 53: 1-8

2228: 2012:

the group. This identification could then lead an individual to protect or aid the group even at one's own cost or without any promise of benefit in return.

412: 2644:

Fehr, Ernst, Urs Fischbacher, and Simon Gächter. 2002. “Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation, and the Enforcement of Social Norms.” Human Nature 13(1):1–25

1840:

that while all forms of exchange are characterized by some type of reciprocity, the structure of reciprocity varies on two key dimensions that affect the

3408:

Keser, C. and F. van Winden. 2000. "Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods." Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102,1:23-39

2142: 2719:

Turk H (September 1976). "Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. By Peter B. Ekeh. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974. 237 pp. $ 8.95".

1580: 1633: 437: 2159: 2223: 1799:, Richard M. Emerson, Toshio Yamagishi, Mary R. Gillmore, Samuel B. Bacharach, and Edward J. Lawler all study negotiated transactions. 1605: 1497: 859: 456: 3093:

Piliavin, Jane Allyn and Hong-Wen Charng. 1990. "Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research." Annual Review of Sociology 16:27-65

2193:, which is an effective method for characterizing the pattern of multiple type and asymmetric social interactions in complex networks. 2050: 2032: 1542: 1455: 1161: 798: 788: 492: 452: 3111:

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

1832:

Negotiated exchange - decisions are made jointly and are strictly binding, they cannot be violated; flow of benefits is bilateral.

247: 2823:

Yamagishi, Toshio, and Karen S. Cook. 1993. “Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas.” Social Psychological Quarterly 56:235–48

3333:

Snippe, Evelien; Jeronimus, Bertus F.; aan het Rot, Marije; Bos, Elisabeth H.; de Jonge, Peter; Wichers, Marieke (April 2018).

2233: 1709: 1688: 547: 332: 83: 3594: 3584: 1562: 1345: 2897:

Yamagishi, Toshio and Karen S. Cook. 1993. "Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas." Social Psychology Quarterly 56:235-48

3599: 1756: 1595: 1585: 813: 467: 3255:

Baker WE, Bulkley N (October 2014). "Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity".

2548:

Lazega E, Pattison PE (1999-01-01). "Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study".

1590: 1183: 132: 98: 3619: 2984:

Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR (2007). "Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity".

2015:

The idea of why society needs exchanges in the first place could date back both anthropologically and sociologically.

1445: 1360: 1273: 1136: 776: 102: 52: 2915:

Bacharach, Samuel B. and Edward J. Lawler. 1981. Bargaining: Power, Tactics, and Outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

3609: 1782:

difficulty of establishing a structure of stable giving without initial levels of high trust or established norms.

1626: 1600: 1243: 1223: 1151: 793: 291: 1055: 990: 783: 619: 352: 222: 88: 3396:

Sell, Jane. 1997. "Gender, Strategies, and Contributions to Public Goods." Social Psychology Quarterly 3:252-265

2130: 1482: 3604: 2064: 1796: 1527: 1517: 1507: 1403: 1233: 1075: 1050: 1000: 342: 177: 2067:. While sociologists view individuals engaged in exchange due to the social factors, anthropologists, such as 2832:

Takahashi, Nobuyuki. 2000. “The Emergence of Generalized Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 105:1105–34

3589: 3298:

Hargadon A, Sutton RI (December 1997). "Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm".

2238: 2075: 1952: 1697: 1552: 1418: 1350: 1266: 1146: 1038: 975: 940: 930: 908: 903: 852: 592: 582: 552: 432: 417: 382: 302: 297: 197: 1769:– self-interested actors who often engage in conflicts over fairness of exchanges and low levels of trust. 2529:

Lévi-Strauss, Claude . 1969 . The Elementary Structures of Kinship, Revised edition . Boston : Beacon

2203: 2068: 1693: 1667: 1492: 1293: 1278: 1218: 1126: 1065: 577: 507: 497: 477: 462: 392: 362: 282: 187: 2654:

Simpson, Brent; Harrell, Ashley; Melamed, David; Heiserman, Nicholas; Negraia, Daniela V. (2018-02-01).

2208: 1619: 1532: 1512: 1316: 1298: 1238: 1198: 1168: 1156: 1106: 1060: 1010: 935: 876: 808: 633: 562: 537: 442: 367: 327: 287: 272: 237: 210: 137: 2123: 3181: 3130: 2213: 1726: 1522: 1203: 1173: 1141: 1116: 1015: 1005: 980: 970: 803: 657: 605: 572: 542: 377: 347: 337: 267: 252: 47: 42: 32: 2218: 2096:. This social dilemma needs to be resolved for generalized exchange systems to emerge and survive. 1537: 1370: 1253: 1228: 1131: 1121: 1101: 945: 677: 422: 322: 160: 147: 3614: 3560: 3370: 3315: 3280: 3154: 3067: 3059: 3001: 2966: 2871: 2806: 2608: 2512: 2462: 2414: 2364: 2325: 2093: 1731: 1557: 1248: 1193: 965: 845: 487: 482: 402: 357: 307: 277: 257: 117: 94: 2583:

Uehara E (November 1990). "Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support".

1829:

Reciprocal exchange - decisions are made individually by actors; flow of benefits is unilateral.

753: 2538:

Malinowski, Bronislaw . 1922 . Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York : E. P. Dutton .

3529: 3494: 3459: 3362: 3354: 3272: 3232: 3197: 3146: 3051: 2958: 2863: 2798: 2736: 2687: 2600: 2565: 2504: 2406: 2317: 2243: 2028: 1841: 1365: 1355: 1333: 1080: 1070: 705: 669: 649: 629: 587: 567: 397: 387: 317: 167: 112: 3334: 3084:

Healy, Kieran. 2001. "Exchange in Blood and Organs." Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University

3521: 3486: 3449: 3439: 3346: 3307: 3264: 3224: 3189: 3138: 3043: 2993: 2950: 2855: 2790: 2763: 2728: 2677: 2667: 2592: 2557: 2496: 2454: 2398: 2356: 2309: 1986:

Some have conceived of indirect reciprocity as being a result of direct reciprocity that is

1713: 1303: 1283: 1020: 995: 757: 717: 661: 517: 472: 427: 372: 312: 227: 192: 142: 1951:

Individuals will conditionally cooperate based on what they believe others are doing in a

1902: 1650: 1547: 1487: 1464: 1213: 765: 761: 745: 725: 653: 641: 530: 502: 447: 407: 172: 122: 3185: 3134: 2767: 2265: 1860:

depended on the actions of a single other actor or multiple actors for valued resources.

3454: 3431: 3121:

Nowak MA, Sigmund K (June 1998). "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring".

2843: 2484: 2043: 1502: 1208: 1025: 985: 833: 749: 741: 737: 733: 685: 645: 232: 78: 2781:

Molm LD (1994). "Dependence and Risk: Transforming the Structure of Social Exchange".

2561: 3578: 3512:

Faraj S, Johnson SL (2010-12-29). "Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities".

3490: 3228: 3005: 2875: 2612: 2516: 2329: 1998:

receiving actor undeserving of sanction. In a similar way, sometimes individuals may

1380: 1375: 1323: 1045: 721: 709: 693: 689: 615: 127: 73: 3284: 3071: 2656:"The Roots of Reciprocity: Gratitude and Reputation in Generalized Exchange Systems" 1751:

and each actor's outcomes depend solely on the behavior of another actor or actors.

3374: 3158: 2970: 1765: 1655: 1288: 1178: 884: 713: 665: 3172:

Wedekind C, Milinski M (May 2000). "Cooperation through image scoring in humans".

2063:

Anthropologists, quite different from sociologists, study the solidarity from the

3193: 2936:"The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results" 2935: 2119: 2114: 1460: 1328: 1085: 958: 925: 729: 701: 673: 557: 512: 242: 217: 3436:

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

3047: 2704:

Alexander, Richard D. 1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: De Gruyter.

2190: 2024: 1922: 1813: 1759:

produce exchanges which have different consequences for trust and solidarity.

1722: 1440: 828: 262: 182: 107: 3533: 3498: 3358: 3276: 3236: 3055: 2962: 2867: 2802: 2740: 2691: 2672: 2655: 2604: 2569: 2508: 2410: 2321: 3477:

Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1989-09-01). "The evolution of indirect reciprocity".

3444: 2079: 1413: 1408: 1340: 681: 637: 24: 3525: 3463: 3366: 3268: 3201: 2844:"Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity" 3150: 2732: 1763:

exchanges are characterized by high emotional tension and lack of trust –

3432:"Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment" 3335:"The Reciprocity of Prosocial Behavior and Positive Affect in Daily Life" 2389:

Yamagishi T, Cook KS (1993). "Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas".

3564: 3548: 3063: 3031: 2682: 1658:

cross-cousin marriage and helping a stranded driver on a desolate road.

3350: 3319: 2810: 2466: 2418: 2368: 1450: 1430: 1398: 1188: 68: 2842:

Molm, Linda D.; Collett, Jessica L.; Schaefer, David R. (2007-07-01).

2344: 2146:

Downward Tit-for-Tat in Network Generalized Exchange (Takahashi, 2000)

1935: 1425: 3311: 2794: 2458: 2443:"Dependence and Risk: Transforming the Structure of Social Exchange" 2402: 2360: 2189:

Generalized exchange structures can be statistically represented by

3549:"Generalized Exchange in Social Networks: Statistics and Structure" 2997: 2954: 2859: 2596: 2500: 2313: 2300:

Takahashi N (2000-01-01). "The Emergence of Generalized Exchange".

3142: 2442: 2158: 2141: 2129: 2934:

Cook KS, Emerson RM, Gillmore MR, Yamagishi T (September 1983).

1435: 892: 2168:

Fairness-based selective giving in pure-generalized exchange

2134:

Generalized Exchange Structures in Yamagishi and Cook (1993)

3032:"Selective Incentives and Generalized Information Exchange" 3217:

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

1835:

Generalized exchange - flow of benefits is unilateral

2754:

Emerson RM (August 1976). "Social Exchange Theory".

3430:Yoeli E, Hoffman M, Rand DG, Nowak MA (June 2013). 2345:"The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement" 1844:or integrative bonds that develop between actors: 1674:The mutual or reciprocal dependence can be either 1856:two additional structural differences emerge: 3250: 3248: 3246: 2229:Reciprocity (social and political philosophy) 2163:Selective giving in pure generalized exchange 1627: 853: 8: 1634: 1620: 871: 860: 846: 31: 15: 3453: 3443: 2681: 2671: 1965:looking forward to future interactions. 3438:. 110 Suppl 2 (Supplement 2): 10424–9. 2256: 883: 23: 2118:strategy was originally introduced in 2035:according to the type of the society. 3425: 3423: 3404: 3402: 3025: 3023: 3021: 3019: 3017: 3015: 2714: 2712: 2710: 7: 2478: 2476: 2436: 2434: 2432: 2430: 2428: 2384: 2382: 2380: 2378: 2295: 2293: 2291: 2289: 2287: 2285: 2283: 2281: 2279: 2768:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 2224:Reciprocity (cultural anthropology) 1848:Whether benefits are reciprocated 14: 3553:L'Année Sociologique (1940/1948-) 2343:Gouldner, Alvin W. (April 1960). 2033:mechanical and organic solidarity 1687:. Both of them rest on a norm of 3300:Administrative Science Quarterly 3229:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02017.x 2122:in order to provide solution to 1934:rewards to incentivize helping. 1786:Variations in Direct Reciprocity 891: 827: 2234:Reciprocity (social psychology) 2031:differentiates solidarity into 1897:Social Psychological Incentives 1743:Direct (Restricted) reciprocity 413:Peace, war, and social conflict 1581:Anthropologists by nationality 1: 3547:Breiger R., Ennis J. (1997). 2986:American Journal of Sociology 2943:American Journal of Sociology 2848:American Journal of Sociology 2585:American Journal of Sociology 2562:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00002-7 2489:American Journal of Sociology 2483:Bearman, Peter (1997-03-01). 2302:American Journal of Sociology 2109:Downward Tit-for-tat strategy 2023:Sociologists use the term of 3491:10.1016/0378-8733(89)90003-8 3194:10.1126/science.288.5467.850 2660:American Sociological Review 2349:American Sociological Review 3036:Social Psychology Quarterly 2783:Social Psychology Quarterly 2447:Social Psychology Quarterly 2391:Social Psychology Quarterly 2059:Anthropological Perspective 3636: 3048:10.1177/019027250707000109 2756:Annual Review of Sociology 1888:Incentives and motivations 1865:Whether benefits can flow 1807:Direct Reciprocal Exchange 1791:Direct Negotiated Exchange 1708:In indirect structures of 1601:List of indigenous peoples 84:Human environmental impact 2151:Pure-generalized exchange 1947:Observational Cooperation 1346:Cross-cultural comparison 2673:10.1177/0003122417747290 2065:structural functionalism 2019:Sociological Perspective 1960:Future-oriented behavior 1735:reputational processes. 1518:Historical particularism 178:Structural functionalism 3445:10.1073/pnas.1301210110 3030:Cheshire, Coye (2007). 2270:Encyclopedia Britannica 2239:Reciprocity (evolution) 1795:American sociologists: 1351:Participant observation 198:Symbolic interactionism 93:Industrial revolutions 3526:10.1287/orsc.1100.0600 3339:Journal of Personality 3269:10.1287/orsc.2014.0920 2485:"Generalized Exchange" 2266:"Generalized exchange" 2204:Social exchange theory 2164: 2147: 2135: 2027:to explain exchanges. 1684:indirect (generalized) 1493:Cross-cultural studies 188:Social constructionism 3595:Sociological theories 3585:Cultural anthropology 2209:Mechanism (sociology) 2162: 2145: 2133: 2039:Mechanical solidarity 563:Conversation analysis 138:Social stratification 3600:Evolutionary biology 3514:Organization Science 3257:Organization Science 2441:Molm, Linda (1994). 2214:Analytical sociology 1918:Rewarding Reputation 1820:Structural Relations 1727:indirect reciprocity 1704:Indirect reciprocity 1647:Generalized exchange 1586:Anthropology by year 1523:Boasian anthropology 1498:Cultural materialism 1483:Actor–network theory 1081:Paleoanthropological 3186:2000Sci...288..850W 3135:1998Natur.393..573N 2733:10.1093/sf/55.1.199 2219:Reciprocal altruism 1993:Exchange is also a 1538:Performance studies 1431:Kinship and descent 1371:Cultural relativism 1021:Paleoethnobotanical 996:Ethnoarchaeological 148:Social cycle theory 19:Part of a series on 3620:Cultural economics 3351:10.1111/jopy.12299 2469:– via JSTOR. 2165: 2148: 2136: 2124:Prisoner’s dilemma 2100:Free rider problem 2094:free rider problem 2051:Organic solidarity 1903:social interaction 1732:prosocial behavior 1714:online communities 1558:Post-structuralism 1317:Research framework 834:Society portal 457:History of science 438:Race and ethnicity 118:Social environment 3610:Social psychology 2244:Social Solidarity 2044:primitive society 2007:Social solidarity 1969:Reactive Behavior 1842:social solidarity 1644: 1643: 1543:Political economy 1366:Thick description 1163:Political economy 1026:Zooarchaeological 986:Bioarchaeological 870: 869: 588:Social experiment 468:Social psychology 113:Social complexity 3627: 3569: 3568: 3544: 3538: 3537: 3520:(6): 1464–1480. 3509: 3503: 3502: 3474: 3468: 3467: 3457: 3447: 3427: 3418: 3415: 3409: 3406: 3397: 3394: 3388: 3385: 3379: 3378: 3330: 3324: 3323: 3295: 3289: 3288: 3263:(5): 1493–1510. 3252: 3241: 3240: 3212: 3206: 3205: 3169: 3163: 3162: 3118: 3112: 3109: 3103: 3100: 3094: 3091: 3085: 3082: 3076: 3075: 3027: 3010: 3009: 2981: 2975: 2974: 2940: 2931: 2925: 2922: 2916: 2913: 2907: 2904: 2898: 2895: 2889: 2886: 2880: 2879: 2839: 2833: 2830: 2824: 2821: 2815: 2814: 2778: 2772: 2771: 2751: 2745: 2744: 2716: 2705: 2702: 2696: 2695: 2685: 2675: 2651: 2645: 2642: 2636: 2632: 2626: 2623: 2617: 2616: 2580: 2574: 2573: 2545: 2539: 2536: 2530: 2527: 2521: 2520: 2495:(5): 1383–1415. 2480: 2471: 2470: 2438: 2423: 2422: 2386: 2373: 2372: 2340: 2334: 2333: 2308:(4): 1105–1134. 2297: 2274: 2273: 2261: 1978:Social mechanism 1662:Reciprocity Norm 1636: 1629: 1622: 1164: 1046:Anthrozoological 895: 872: 862: 855: 848: 832: 831: 583:Network analysis 473:Sociocybernetics 463:Social movements 193:Social darwinism 143:Social structure 35: 16: 3635: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3605:Social networks 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3546: 3545: 3541: 3511: 3510: 3506: 3479:Social Networks 3476: 3475: 3471: 3429: 3428: 3421: 3416: 3412: 3407: 3400: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3382: 3332: 3331: 3327: 3312:10.2307/2393655 3297: 3296: 3292: 3254: 3253: 3244: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3180:(5467): 850–2. 3171: 3170: 3166: 3129:(6685): 573–7. 3120: 3119: 3115: 3110: 3106: 3101: 3097: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3079: 3029: 3028: 3013: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2938: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2923: 2919: 2914: 2910: 2905: 2901: 2896: 2892: 2887: 2883: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2818: 2795:10.2307/2786874 2780: 2779: 2775: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2718: 2717: 2708: 2703: 2699: 2653: 2652: 2648: 2643: 2639: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2620: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2550:Social Networks 2547: 2546: 2542: 2537: 2533: 2528: 2524: 2482: 2481: 2474: 2459:10.2307/2786874 2440: 2439: 2426: 2403:10.2307/2786661 2388: 2387: 2376: 2361:10.2307/2092623 2342: 2341: 2337: 2299: 2298: 2277: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2253: 2248: 2199: 2179: 2170: 2153: 2111: 2102: 2089: 2087:Social dilemmas 2061: 2021: 2009: 1980: 1971: 1962: 1949: 1920: 1911: 1909:Social Approval 1899: 1890: 1822: 1809: 1793: 1788: 1745: 1725:processes. The 1706: 1668:social exchange 1664: 1651:social exchange 1640: 1611: 1610: 1576: 1568: 1567: 1548:Practice theory 1488:Alliance theory 1478: 1470: 1469: 1465:Postcolonialism 1394: 1386: 1385: 1319: 1309: 1308: 1274:Anthropological 1269: 1259: 1258: 1162: 1112: 1111: 1091: 1090: 1041: 1031: 1030: 961: 951: 950: 921: 913: 866: 826: 819: 818: 779: 769: 768: 696: 622: 608: 606:Major theorists 598: 597: 533: 523: 522: 213: 203: 202: 173:Critical theory 168:Conflict theory 163: 153: 152: 123:Social equality 64: 12: 11: 5: 3633: 3631: 3623: 3622: 3617: 3612: 3607: 3602: 3597: 3592: 3590:Value (ethics) 3587: 3577: 3576: 3571: 3570: 3539: 3504: 3485:(3): 213–236. 3469: 3419: 3410: 3398: 3389: 3380: 3345:(2): 139–146. 3325: 3306:(4): 716–749. 3290: 3242: 3223:(1): 156–180. 3207: 3164: 3113: 3104: 3095: 3086: 3077: 3011: 2998:10.1086/517900 2992:(1): 205–242. 2976: 2955:10.1086/227866 2949:(2): 275–305. 2926: 2917: 2908: 2899: 2890: 2881: 2860:10.1086/517900 2854:(1): 205–242. 2834: 2825: 2816: 2789:(3): 163–176. 2773: 2762:(1): 335–362. 2746: 2727:(1): 199–200. 2706: 2697: 2646: 2637: 2627: 2618: 2597:10.1086/229571 2591:(3): 521–557. 2575: 2540: 2531: 2522: 2501:10.1086/231087 2472: 2453:(3): 163–176. 2424: 2397:(4): 235–248. 2374: 2355:(2): 161–178. 2335: 2314:10.1086/210400 2275: 2255: 2254: 2252: 2249: 2247: 2246: 2241: 2236: 2231: 2226: 2221: 2216: 2211: 2206: 2200: 2198: 2195: 2178: 2175: 2169: 2166: 2152: 2149: 2110: 2107: 2101: 2098: 2088: 2085: 2060: 2057: 2029:Emile Durkheim 2020: 2017: 2008: 2005: 1979: 1976: 1970: 1967: 1961: 1958: 1948: 1945: 1919: 1916: 1910: 1907: 1898: 1895: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1821: 1818: 1808: 1805: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1755:structures of 1744: 1741: 1705: 1702: 1663: 1660: 1642: 1641: 1639: 1638: 1631: 1624: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1563:Systems theory 1560: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1510: 1505: 1503:Culture theory 1500: 1495: 1490: 1485: 1479: 1476: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1458: 1453: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1326: 1320: 1315: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1270: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1104: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1086:Primatological 1083: 1078: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1058: 1053: 1048: 1042: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1008: 1003: 998: 993: 988: 983: 978: 973: 968: 962: 959:Archaeological 957: 956: 953: 952: 949: 948: 943: 938: 933: 928: 926:Archaeological 922: 919: 918: 915: 914: 912: 911: 906: 900: 897: 896: 888: 887: 881: 880: 868: 867: 865: 864: 857: 850: 842: 839: 838: 837: 836: 821: 820: 817: 816: 811: 806: 801: 796: 791: 786: 780: 775: 774: 771: 770: 624: 623: 609: 604: 603: 600: 599: 596: 595: 590: 585: 580: 575: 570: 565: 560: 555: 550: 545: 540: 534: 529: 528: 525: 524: 521: 520: 515: 510: 505: 500: 495: 490: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 460: 450: 445: 440: 435: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 405: 400: 395: 390: 385: 380: 375: 370: 365: 360: 355: 350: 345: 340: 335: 330: 325: 320: 315: 310: 305: 300: 295: 285: 280: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 250: 245: 240: 235: 233:Astrosociology 230: 225: 220: 214: 209: 208: 205: 204: 201: 200: 195: 190: 185: 180: 175: 170: 164: 159: 158: 155: 154: 151: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 115: 110: 105: 91: 86: 81: 79:Human behavior 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 58: 57: 56: 55: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 27: 21: 20: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3632: 3621: 3618: 3616: 3613: 3611: 3608: 3606: 3603: 3601: 3598: 3596: 3593: 3591: 3588: 3586: 3583: 3582: 3580: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3543: 3540: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3508: 3505: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3473: 3470: 3465: 3461: 3456: 3451: 3446: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3426: 3424: 3420: 3414: 3411: 3405: 3403: 3399: 3393: 3390: 3384: 3381: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3329: 3326: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3294: 3291: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3251: 3249: 3247: 3243: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3211: 3208: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3168: 3165: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3143:10.1038/31225 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3117: 3114: 3108: 3105: 3099: 3096: 3090: 3087: 3081: 3078: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3042:(1): 82–100. 3041: 3037: 3033: 3026: 3024: 3022: 3020: 3018: 3016: 3012: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2980: 2977: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2937: 2930: 2927: 2921: 2918: 2912: 2909: 2903: 2900: 2894: 2891: 2885: 2882: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2838: 2835: 2829: 2826: 2820: 2817: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2777: 2774: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721:Social Forces 2715: 2713: 2711: 2707: 2701: 2698: 2693: 2689: 2684: 2679: 2674: 2669: 2666:(1): 88–110. 2665: 2661: 2657: 2650: 2647: 2641: 2638: 2631: 2628: 2622: 2619: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2579: 2576: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2544: 2541: 2535: 2532: 2526: 2523: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2479: 2477: 2473: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2437: 2435: 2433: 2431: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2385: 2383: 2381: 2379: 2375: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2339: 2336: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2296: 2294: 2292: 2290: 2288: 2286: 2284: 2282: 2280: 2276: 2271: 2267: 2260: 2257: 2250: 2245: 2242: 2240: 2237: 2235: 2232: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2222: 2220: 2217: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2196: 2194: 2192: 2187: 2183: 2176: 2174: 2167: 2161: 2157: 2150: 2144: 2140: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2108: 2106: 2099: 2097: 2095: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2077: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2058: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2047: 2045: 2040: 2036: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2018: 2016: 2013: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1996: 1991: 1989: 1984: 1977: 1975: 1968: 1966: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1917: 1915: 1908: 1906: 1904: 1896: 1894: 1887: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1858: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1843: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1819: 1817: 1815: 1806: 1804: 1800: 1798: 1797:Karen S. Cook 1790: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1776: 1770: 1768: 1767: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1742: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1703: 1701: 1699: 1695: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1680: 1678: 1672: 1669: 1666:All forms of 1661: 1659: 1657: 1652: 1649:is a type of 1648: 1637: 1632: 1630: 1625: 1623: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1614: 1607: 1606:Organizations 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1572: 1571: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1553:Structuralism 1551: 1549: 1546: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1536: 1534: 1531: 1529: 1528:Functionalism 1526: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1504: 1501: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1466: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1419:sociocultural 1417: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1390: 1389: 1382: 1381:Emic and etic 1379: 1377: 1376:Ethnocentrism 1374: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1324:Anthropometry 1322: 1321: 1318: 1313: 1312: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1289:Ethnopoetical 1287: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1244:Transpersonal 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1224:Psychological 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1184:Institutional 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1152:Environmental 1150: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1035: 1034: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 997: 994: 992: 991:Environmental 989: 987: 984: 982: 979: 977: 974: 972: 969: 967: 964: 963: 960: 955: 954: 947: 944: 942: 939: 937: 934: 932: 929: 927: 924: 923: 917: 916: 910: 907: 905: 902: 901: 899: 898: 894: 890: 889: 886: 882: 878: 874: 873: 863: 858: 856: 851: 849: 844: 843: 841: 840: 835: 830: 825: 824: 823: 822: 815: 812: 810: 807: 805: 802: 800: 799:Organizations 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 781: 778: 773: 772: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 748: · 747: 744: · 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 704: · 703: 700: 697: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 636: · 635: 631: 628: 621: 617: 614: 611: 610: 607: 602: 601: 594: 591: 589: 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 553:Computational 551: 549: 546: 544: 541: 539: 536: 535: 532: 527: 526: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 458: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 431: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 404: 401: 399: 396: 394: 391: 389: 386: 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 324: 321: 319: 316: 314: 311: 309: 306: 304: 301: 299: 298:Environmental 296: 293: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 248:Consciousness 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224: 221: 219: 216: 215: 212: 207: 206: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 169: 166: 165: 162: 157: 156: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 131: 129: 128:Social equity 126: 124: 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109: 106: 104: 100: 96: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 74:Globalization 72: 70: 67: 66: 60: 59: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 39: 38: 34: 30: 29: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3559:(1): 73–88. 3556: 3552: 3542: 3517: 3513: 3507: 3482: 3478: 3472: 3435: 3413: 3392: 3383: 3342: 3338: 3328: 3303: 3299: 3293: 3260: 3256: 3220: 3216: 3210: 3177: 3173: 3167: 3126: 3122: 3116: 3107: 3098: 3089: 3080: 3039: 3035: 2989: 2985: 2979: 2946: 2942: 2929: 2920: 2911: 2902: 2893: 2884: 2851: 2847: 2837: 2828: 2819: 2786: 2782: 2776: 2759: 2755: 2749: 2724: 2720: 2700: 2683:11244/339841 2663: 2659: 2649: 2640: 2630: 2621: 2588: 2584: 2578: 2556:(1): 67–90. 2553: 2549: 2543: 2534: 2525: 2492: 2488: 2450: 2446: 2394: 2390: 2352: 2348: 2338: 2305: 2301: 2269: 2264:Cheshire C. 2259: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2171: 2154: 2137: 2113: 2112: 2103: 2090: 2078:studies the 2073: 2069:Levi-Strauss 2062: 2049: 2048: 2038: 2037: 2022: 2014: 2010: 1999: 1994: 1992: 1987: 1985: 1981: 1972: 1963: 1953:public goods 1950: 1941: 1932: 1928: 1921: 1912: 1900: 1891: 1870: 1867:unilaterally 1866: 1853: 1849: 1838: 1823: 1810: 1801: 1794: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1766:quid pro quo 1764: 1760: 1752: 1748: 1746: 1737: 1717: 1707: 1694:Lévi-Strauss 1683: 1682: 1679:(restricted) 1676: 1675: 1673: 1665: 1656:matrilateral 1646: 1645: 1591:Bibliography 1533:Interpretive 1508:Diffusionism 1477:Key theories 1463: / 1393:Key concepts 1304:Sociological 1284:Ethnological 1071:Neurological 1056:Evolutionary 1001:Experiential 885:Anthropology 784:Bibliography 698: 626: 625: 612: 578:Mathematical 558:Ethnographic 538:Quantitative 223:Architecture 161:Perspectives 133:Social power 2635:2):10424–29 2191:blockmodels 2120:game theory 2115:Tit-for-Tat 1871:bilaterally 1854:indirectly, 1757:reciprocity 1710:reciprocity 1696:(1969) and 1689:reciprocity 1461:Colonialism 1404:Development 1361:Reflexivity 1329:Ethnography 1279:Descriptive 1137:Development 1076:Nutritional 1051:Biocultural 976:Battlefield 789:Terminology 758:Baudrillard 634:Tocqueville 548:Comparative 543:Qualitative 513:Victimology 343:Immigration 328:Generations 243:Criminology 3579:Categories 2251:References 2076:Malinowski 2025:solidarity 1983:standing. 1923:Reputation 1814:bargaining 1779:reciprocal 1775:negotiated 1723:reputation 1721:rooted in 1698:Malinowski 1441:Prehistory 1294:Historical 1267:Linguistic 1179:Historical 1147:Ecological 1039:Biological 941:Linguistic 931:Biological 814:By country 568:Historical 493:Technology 433:Punishment 418:Philosophy 393:Mathematic 383:Literature 348:Industrial 338:Historical 263:Demography 183:Positivism 108:Popularity 63:Key themes 3615:Evolution 3534:1047-7039 3499:0378-8733 3359:0022-3506 3277:1047-7039 3237:2044-8325 3056:0190-2725 3006:145394073 2963:0002-9602 2876:145394073 2868:0002-9602 2803:0190-2725 2741:0037-7732 2692:0003-1224 2613:144517451 2605:0002-9602 2570:0378-8733 2517:222436096 2509:0002-9602 2411:0190-2725 2330:153964181 2322:0002-9602 2080:kula ring 2074:However, 1877:exchange. 1414:Evolution 1409:Ethnicity 1341:Ethnology 1219:Political 1127:Cognitive 1066:Molecular 630:Martineau 573:Interview 498:Terrorism 478:Sociology 423:Political 363:Knowledge 283:Education 25:Sociology 3565:27889501 3464:23754399 3367:28093772 3285:15509645 3202:10797005 3072:11037927 3064:20141769 2197:See also 2177:Contexts 1988:observed 1869:or only 1850:directly 1718:indirect 1596:Journals 1513:Feminism 1299:Semiotic 1239:Symbolic 1234:Religion 1169:Feminist 1157:Economic 1107:Cultural 1061:Forensic 1016:Maritime 1011:Forensic 1006:Feminist 981:Biblical 971:Aviation 936:Cultural 877:a series 875:Part of 809:Timeline 794:Journals 762:Bourdieu 754:Habermas 750:Luhmann 746:Foucault 690:Mannheim 670:Durkheim 443:Religion 403:Military 368:Language 353:Internet 308:Feminist 292:Jealousy 278:Economic 273:Disaster 268:Deviance 211:Branches 89:Identity 3455:3690615 3375:3737616 3320:2393655 3182:Bibcode 3174:Science 3159:4395576 3151:9634232 3131:Bibcode 2971:1063394 2811:2786874 2467:2786874 2419:2786661 2369:2092623 1881:actors. 1451:Society 1399:Culture 1214:Musical 1209:Museums 1204:Medical 1189:Kinship 1142:Digital 1117:Applied 909:History 904:Outline 766:Giddens 764:· 760:· 752:· 740:· 738:Goffman 734:Schoeck 720:· 712:· 688:· 686:Du Bois 684:· 676:· 672:· 664:· 658:Tönnies 656:· 642:Spencer 640:· 618:· 531:Methods 508:Utopian 453:Science 398:Medical 388:Marxist 378:Leisure 288:Emotion 253:Culture 69:Society 48:Outline 43:History 3563: 3532: 3497: 3462: 3452: 3373: 3365: 3357: 3318: 3283: 3275: 3235: 3200: 3157: 3149: 3123:Nature 3070: 3062: 3054: 3004: 2969: 2961: 2874: 2866: 2809: 2801: 2739: 2690: 2611: 2603: 2568: 2515: 2507: 2465: 2417: 2409: 2367: 2328: 2320: 2000:intend 1936:Google 1761:Direct 1753:Direct 1749:direct 1677:direct 1426:Gender 1356:Holism 1254:Visual 1229:Public 1132:Cyborg 1102:Social 966:Aerial 946:Social 804:People 742:Bauman 722:Nisbet 718:Merton 710:Gehlen 706:Adorno 699:1900s: 674:Addams 666:Simmel 662:Veblen 654:Pareto 646:Le Bon 627:1800s: 620:Sieyès 613:1700s: 593:Survey 518:Visual 428:Public 333:Health 323:Gender 313:Fiscal 303:Family 3561:JSTOR 3371:S2CID 3316:JSTOR 3281:S2CID 3155:S2CID 3068:S2CID 3060:JSTOR 3002:S2CID 2967:S2CID 2939:(PDF) 2872:S2CID 2807:JSTOR 2609:S2CID 2513:S2CID 2463:JSTOR 2415:JSTOR 2365:JSTOR 2326:S2CID 1995:human 1716:. In 1575:Lists 1456:Value 1334:cyber 1249:Urban 1199:Media 1194:Legal 920:Types 777:Lists 726:Mills 702:Fromm 694:Elias 682:Weber 616:Comte 503:Urban 488:Sport 483:Space 448:Rural 408:Music 358:Jewry 258:Death 218:Aging 53:Index 3530:ISSN 3495:ISSN 3460:PMID 3363:PMID 3355:ISSN 3273:ISSN 3233:ISSN 3198:PMID 3147:PMID 3052:ISSN 2959:ISSN 2864:ISSN 2799:ISSN 2737:ISSN 2688:ISSN 2601:ISSN 2566:ISSN 2505:ISSN 2407:ISSN 2318:ISSN 1777:and 1446:Race 1436:Meme 1174:Food 730:Bell 714:Aron 678:Mead 650:Ward 638:Marx 318:Food 238:Body 3522:doi 3487:doi 3450:PMC 3440:doi 3347:doi 3308:doi 3265:doi 3225:doi 3190:doi 3178:288 3139:doi 3127:393 3044:doi 2994:doi 2990:113 2951:doi 2856:doi 2852:113 2791:doi 2764:doi 2729:doi 2678:hdl 2668:doi 2593:doi 2558:doi 2497:doi 2493:102 2455:doi 2399:doi 2357:doi 2310:doi 2306:105 1852:or 1681:or 1122:Art 373:Law 228:Art 3581:: 3557:47 3555:. 3551:. 3528:. 3518:22 3516:. 3493:. 3483:11 3481:. 3458:. 3448:. 3434:. 3422:^ 3401:^ 3369:. 3361:. 3353:. 3343:86 3341:. 3337:. 3314:. 3304:42 3302:. 3279:. 3271:. 3261:25 3259:. 3245:^ 3231:. 3221:85 3219:. 3196:. 3188:. 3176:. 3153:. 3145:. 3137:. 3125:. 3066:. 3058:. 3050:. 3040:70 3038:. 3034:. 3014:^ 3000:. 2988:. 2965:. 2957:. 2947:89 2945:. 2941:. 2870:. 2862:. 2850:. 2846:. 2805:. 2797:. 2787:57 2785:. 2758:. 2735:. 2725:55 2723:. 2709:^ 2686:. 2676:. 2664:83 2662:. 2658:. 2607:. 2599:. 2589:96 2587:. 2564:. 2554:21 2552:. 2511:. 2503:. 2491:. 2487:. 2475:^ 2461:. 2451:57 2449:. 2445:. 2427:^ 2413:. 2405:. 2395:56 2393:. 2377:^ 2363:. 2353:25 2351:. 2347:. 2324:. 2316:. 2304:. 2278:^ 2268:. 1873:. 1816:. 879:on 756:· 736:· 732:· 728:· 724:· 716:· 708:· 692:· 680:· 668:· 660:· 652:· 648:· 644:· 632:· 101:/ 97:/ 3567:. 3536:. 3524:: 3501:. 3489:: 3466:. 3442:: 3377:. 3349:: 3322:. 3310:: 3287:. 3267:: 3239:. 3227:: 3204:. 3192:: 3184:: 3161:. 3141:: 3133:: 3074:. 3046:: 3008:. 2996:: 2973:. 2953:: 2878:. 2858:: 2813:. 2793:: 2770:. 2766:: 2760:2 2743:. 2731:: 2694:. 2680:: 2670:: 2615:. 2595:: 2572:. 2560:: 2519:. 2499:: 2457:: 2421:. 2401:: 2371:. 2359:: 2332:. 2312:: 2272:. 1635:e 1628:t 1621:v 861:e 854:t 847:v 459:) 455:( 294:) 290:( 103:5 99:4 95:3

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.