308:
voting on election day), the State sends these inactive voters a confirmation notice via mail. If the voter does not respond to that notice, re-register, or vote over the next four years, the voter is removed from the list of registered voters. A similar approach is used in eighteen other states to trim voter registration lists, though Ohio's approach holds a strong reliance on the two-year non-voting break to trigger the process, faster than most other states. In 2016, an estimated 144,000 people were removed from Ohio's voter registration list in the three largest counties in the state, containing the cities
31:
456:, as well as supporting similar approaches used in six other states. This approach made it harder for thousands of people to vote, especially minority and poor citizens as well as disabled voters and veterans, and it has been criticized by analysts because it has a greater effect on minorities or others that would normally vote as a Democrat, thus giving Republicans an edge in this upcoming election. Several other states have indicated that they would likely adopt similar language as Ohio's should the Court find in favor of the state.
412:, 138 S. Ct. 1833 (2018) that Section 8(d) "provides that a State may remove a registrant who "(i) has failed to respond to a notice" and "(ii) has not voted or appeared to vote ... during the period beginning on the date of the notice and ending on the day after the date of the second general election for Federal office that occurs after the date of the notice" (about four years). 52 U. S. C. §20507(d)(l)(B). Not only are States allowed to remove registrants who satisfy these requirements,
444:, argued against Alito's reading of Congress's intent with the two laws, and believed that Ohio's approach did violate this intent. Breyer wrote that this process presumes action on the absence of a response, since only few of those that are mailed voter cards reply back to them. Sotomayor opined in a separate dissent that Ohio's voter-list purging puts too much of an onus on registered voters, and weights against minority, low-income, disabled and veteran voters.
1087:"Undated settlement agreement between Judicial Watch, Inc. ("Judicial Watch"), Election Integrity Project California, Inc., Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), Dean C. Logan in his official capacity as the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of Los Angeles County ("Registrar Logan") and Alex Padilla, in his official capacity as the California Secretary of State ("Secretary Padilla"), at page 4"
1018:"Undated settlement agreement between Judicial Watch, Inc. ("Judicial Watch"), Election Integrity Project California, Inc., Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), Dean C. Logan in his official capacity as the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of Los Angeles County ("Registrar Logan") and Alex Padilla, in his official capacity as the California Secretary of State ("Secretary Padilla"), at page 3"
499:'s gerrymandering decision, the Court holds that past discrimination by states—even at its boldest and most naked—is not really a consideration in assessments of current policies. This part is crucial, because in an era where crafty state politicians have moved toward race-neutral language that clearly still seeks to disenfranchise people of color, a certain default suspicion by federal courts and the
401:(a) The registrant fails to respond to a notice (a "Section 8(d)(2) Notice") that includes a postage prepaid and preaddressed return card sent by forwardable mail, on which the registrant may state his or her current address, and which contains specific instructions and information consistent with the language set forth in 52 U.S.C. § 20507(d)(2), and
419:
Alito wrote that in interpreting
Congress's intention of the Failure-to-Vote clause, amended by the Help America Vote act and a point of contention raised by the respondents, was not in claimed conflict with previous language from the National Voter Registration Act. Alito wrote that Ohio's law "does
349:
On May 30, 2017, the
Supreme Court agreed to hear the case later that year. The Court was scheduled to hear oral arguments November 8, 2017, however the Court temporarily removed the case from its argument calendar due to one of the parties' attorneys being ill. The case was argued on January 10,
323:
The case originated from Larry Harmon, a resident of the state who had previously voted in the 2008 elections, but did not vote in either the 2012 main election or the 2010 and 2014 mid-term elections. Desiring to vote on an issue in 2015, Harmon found that his name had been struck from the voter
307:
Ohio law provides a process to remove an inactive voter from its list of registered voters. After a two-year break from certain voting activities specified by Ohio law (i.e., filing a change of address, filing a registration to vote, casting an absentee ballot, casting a provisional ballot, or
396:
found that the process Ohio used follows the specifications of both the
National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act. Under Section 8(d), 52 U.S.C. § 20507(d), a registration is subject to removal from the official list of eligible voters on grounds of a change of residence if:
340:
reversed. It concluded that, although federal law allows Ohio to remove voters who did not either respond to the confirmation notice or vote in two elections, the state’s process uses the failure to vote as the basis for initiating removal, which is not authorized by federal law.
404:(b) The registrant then fails to vote or appear to vote or to correct the Registrar's record during the period ending on the day after the second federal general election subsequent to the Section 8(d)(2) notice being sent. 52 U.S.C. § 20507(d)(l)(B).
286:
regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a confirmation notice to that voter under the
1056:
420:
not strike any registrant solely by reason of the failure to vote" and "nstead, as expressly permitted by federal law, it removes registrants only when they have failed to vote and have failed to respond to a change-of-residence notice".
1247:
336:, which bars states from removing someone from the voter registration list for not voting and sets out a process for states to remove voters who have moved away. The state prevailed in federal district court. The
1185:
1216:
660:
1064:
1816:
503:
based on those state politicians' histories has been the main protective force for the minorities' voting rights. That suspicion is gone now, as are all vestiges of
Marshall's intended vigilance."
1335:
1274:
1251:
1086:
1017:
488:
731:
1411:
79:
620:
495:
no longer a valid justification for proactive restrictions on states, but the Court doesn't necessarily have a role in advancing the spirit of the franchise. Furthermore, with
337:
114:
1369:
1193:
534:
1224:
668:
1811:
1547:
696:
1806:
1669:
1479:
1154:
376:
The Court announced judgment in favor of the state on June 10, 2018, reversing the Sixth
Circuit by a vote of 5–4. Writing for the majority, Justice
1645:
1343:
1801:
333:
288:
132:
1307:
539:
362:
1284:
1097:
1028:
491:
and arbiters for
America's racial injustices." With the three cases together "the Court has established that not only are the legacies of
1502:
741:
500:
1488:
628:
569:
283:
265:
140:
35:
1057:"California and Los Angeles County to Remove 1.5 Million Inactive Voters from Voter Rolls – Settle Judicial Watch Federal Lawsuit"
884:
558:
1381:
907:
1472:
453:
136:
811:
325:
661:"Jurisprudence: Sonia Sotomayor's Dissent in the Big Voter-Purge Case Points to How the Law Might Still Be Struck Down"
1766:
1523:
1448:
328:, a labor and civil rights group, originally filed this lawsuit for Mr. Harmon against Ohio’s Secretary of State,
1734:
1592:
529:
518:
355:
147:, permit Ohio to have a list-maintenance process that removes people from the state's on the basis of inactivity.
1750:
1465:
1123:
858:
942:
1653:
1605:
1220:
1189:
513:
465:
1621:
1563:
1539:
1774:
1571:
1415:
292:
74:
1515:
1457:
967:
1186:"Politics: Supreme Court Deals a Blow to Voting Rights and Invites More States to Purge Their Rolls"
1217:"Politics: The Supreme Court Is About to Hear a Case That Could Unleash a New Wave of Voter Purges"
788:
433:
182:
1758:
1629:
992:
947:
736:
416:. Id. at 1841-42 (emphasis added), citing 52 U.S.C. § 20507(d)(3); 52 U.S.C. § 21083(a)(4)(A)."
408:
With respect to the aforementioned described section the United States
Supreme Court stated in
1703:
1637:
1440:
984:
915:
484:
295:
of 2002. If the mail is not returned, the voter is stricken from the rolls, a practice called
833:
976:
664:
317:
962:
483:", because these cases "furthered Roberts's mandate to distance the federal judiciary from
1742:
1690:
1613:
1422:
524:
480:
475:
452:
The decision, issued in June, allows Ohio to continue pruning its voter list prior to the
437:
389:
385:
309:
202:
178:
170:
324:
lists, following Ohio's process, but he claims he never received the postal notice. The
1093:
1060:
1024:
701:
429:
365:
358:
313:
190:
63:
1795:
996:
589:
Supreme Court Rules Ohio Voter Roll Law
Comports with National Voter Registration Act
492:
460:
351:
329:
1555:
1531:
1377:
624:
573:
496:
393:
381:
377:
296:
269:
214:
194:
162:
144:
110:
299:. The Court ruled in a 5–4 decision that Ohio's law did not violate federal laws.
1155:"Supreme Court says states can remove voters who skip elections, ignore warnings"
763:
441:
206:
1336:"Law: Divided Supreme Court Upholds Nearly All Of Texas GOP Redistricting Plan"
1452:
118:
988:
919:
1308:"Supreme Court gives Ohio right to purge thousands of voters from its rolls"
1159:
1051:
1049:
587:
86:
1431:
1312:
1279:
1248:"Use it or lose it: Occasional Ohio voters may be shut out in November"
1124:"Supreme Court upholds Ohio method of removing names from voter rolls"
530:
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a core section of the Act
519:
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a core section of the Act
980:
834:"GRANTED & NOTED LIST CASES FOR ARGUMENT IN OCTOBER TERM 2017"
107:
1722:
1688:
1590:
1500:
1461:
1363:
1361:
30:
1339:
1128:
859:"Ohio voter case removed from November calendar - SCOTUSblog"
459:
Journalist Vann R. Newkirk II asserted in July 2018 that the
961:
Manheim, Lisa
Marshall; Porter, Elizabeth G. (May 1, 2019).
54:
Jon A. Husted et al. v. A. Philip
Randolph Institute et al.
1179:
1177:
963:"The Elephant in the Room: Intentional Voter Suppression"
614:
612:
610:
282:, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the
469:
decision along with the 2018 Supreme Court decisions in
887:. Supreme Court of the United States. November 17, 2017
1817:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
697:"U.S. Supreme Court Backs States' Voter-Purge Efforts"
487:'s vision of those bodies as active watchdogs for the
1275:"Trump Administration Stirs Alarm Over Voter Purges"
732:"Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Purge of Voting Rolls"
654:
652:
650:
648:
646:
338:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1122:de Vogue, Ariane; Vazquez, Maegan (June 11, 2018).
259:
251:
243:
235:
227:
222:
151:
125:
99:
94:
69:
59:
49:
42:
23:
621:"Politics: The Supreme Court Blesses Voter Purges"
231:Alito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Gorsuch
908:"Supreme Court Weighs Purge of Ohio Voting Rolls"
595:. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service
764:"16-980 HUSTED V. A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE"
432:wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices
1473:
8:
1148:
1146:
943:The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Leading Cases
414:but federal law makes this removal mandatory
247:Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
1246:Andy Sullivan; Grant Smith (June 6, 2016).
690:
688:
686:
1719:
1685:
1587:
1548:Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board
1497:
1480:
1466:
1458:
332:, alleging that this process violated the
20:
1670:Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
725:
723:
721:
719:
1646:Crawford v. Marion County Election Board
551:
334:National Voter Registration Act of 1993
289:National Voter Registration Act of 1993
133:National Voter Registration Act of 1993
1408:Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute
540:Voter suppression in the United States
363:Solicitor General of the United States
279:Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute
1368:Newkirk II, Vann R. (July 10, 2018).
448:Subsequent developments and criticism
18:2018 United States Supreme Court case
7:
839:. Supreme Court of the United States
586:Whitaker, L. Paige (July 24, 2018).
659:Hasen, Richard L. (June 11, 2018).
789:"Granted and Noted List Fall 2017"
410:Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst.
284:Supreme Court of the United States
121:. granted, 137 S. Ct. 2188 (2017).
104:A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Husted
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1812:United States Supreme Court cases
1418:___ (2018) is available from:
1334:Totenberg, Nina (June 25, 2018).
1063:. January 3, 2019. Archived from
1807:United States elections case law
1767:Munro v. Socialist Workers Party
1306:Williams, Pete (June 11, 2018).
29:
1153:Wolf, Richard (June 11, 2016).
619:Epps, Garrett (June 12, 2018).
1802:2018 in United States case law
730:Liptak, Adam (June 11, 2018).
1:
1273:Timm, Jane (August 7, 2017).
1215:Pema Levy (January 5, 2018).
695:Stohr, Greg (June 11, 2018).
137:Help America Vote Act of 2002
1662:Husted v. Randolph Institute
1441:Supreme Court (slip opinion)
740:. p. A1. Archived from
471:Husted v. Randolph Institute
326:A. Philip Randolph Institute
24:Husted v. Randolph Institute
1489:United States Supreme Court
1184:Pema Levy (June 11, 2018).
810:Ford, Matt (May 30, 2017).
528:(2018) A case dealing with
517:(2013) A case dealing with
481:a new era of white hegemony
1833:
1524:Burroughs v. United States
1432:Oyez (oral argument audio)
139:, as prescribed by law in
1735:Newberry v. United States
1729:
1718:
1698:
1684:
1600:
1586:
1510:
1496:
1250:. Reuters. Archived from
264:
156:
130:
28:
1751:United States v. Classic
941:
1654:Shelby County v. Holder
1606:Williams v. Mississippi
1372:Shelby County v. Holder
514:Shelby County v. Holder
479:has "set the stage for
466:Shelby County v. Holder
43:Argued January 10, 2018
1622:Guinn v. United States
1564:Chiafalo v. Washington
1540:Anderson v. Celebrezze
1491:election-related cases
356:Ohio Solicitor General
1775:Rucho v. Common Cause
1572:Texas v. Pennsylvania
1503:Presidential election
1340:National Public Radio
906:Liptak, Adam (2018).
501:Department of Justice
380:, joined by Justices
293:Help America Vote Act
85:138 S. Ct. 1833; 201
45:Decided June 11, 2018
1516:McPherson v. Blacker
1254:on February 23, 2021
1067:on December 24, 2020
968:Supreme Court Review
812:"Use It or Lose It?"
372:Opinion of the Court
1638:Purcell v. Gonzalez
1196:on February 8, 2021
454:2018 election cycle
434:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
183:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1759:Williams v. Rhodes
1630:Oregon v. Mitchell
1103:on January 5, 2021
1034:on January 5, 2021
912:The New York Times
865:. October 27, 2017
737:The New York Times
167:Associate Justices
1789:
1788:
1785:
1784:
1714:
1713:
1704:Taylor v. Beckham
1680:
1679:
1582:
1581:
485:Thurgood Marshall
350:2018 by attorney
275:
274:
1824:
1720:
1686:
1588:
1498:
1482:
1475:
1468:
1459:
1445:
1439:
1436:
1430:
1427:
1421:
1394:
1393:
1391:
1389:
1380:. Archived from
1365:
1356:
1355:
1353:
1351:
1342:. Archived from
1331:
1325:
1324:
1322:
1320:
1303:
1297:
1296:
1294:
1292:
1287:on March 1, 2021
1283:. Archived from
1270:
1264:
1263:
1261:
1259:
1243:
1237:
1236:
1234:
1232:
1227:on March 1, 2021
1223:. Archived from
1212:
1206:
1205:
1203:
1201:
1192:. Archived from
1181:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1167:
1150:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1136:
1119:
1113:
1112:
1110:
1108:
1102:
1096:. Archived from
1091:
1083:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1072:
1053:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1033:
1027:. Archived from
1022:
1014:
1008:
1007:
1005:
1003:
958:
952:
951:
945:
937:
931:
930:
928:
926:
903:
897:
896:
894:
892:
881:
875:
874:
872:
870:
855:
849:
848:
846:
844:
838:
830:
824:
823:
821:
819:
807:
801:
800:
798:
796:
785:
779:
778:
776:
774:
768:
760:
754:
753:
751:
749:
744:on June 26, 2020
727:
714:
713:
711:
709:
692:
681:
680:
678:
676:
667:. Archived from
656:
641:
640:
638:
636:
627:. Archived from
616:
605:
604:
602:
600:
594:
583:
577:
567:
561:
556:
152:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
1832:
1831:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1781:
1743:Nixon v. Condon
1725:
1710:
1694:
1691:Electoral fraud
1676:
1614:Giles v. Harris
1596:
1578:
1506:
1492:
1486:
1443:
1437:
1434:
1428:
1425:
1419:
1403:
1398:
1397:
1387:
1385:
1370:"Politics: How
1367:
1366:
1359:
1349:
1347:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1318:
1316:
1305:
1304:
1300:
1290:
1288:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1257:
1255:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1230:
1228:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1199:
1197:
1183:
1182:
1175:
1165:
1163:
1152:
1151:
1144:
1134:
1132:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1106:
1104:
1100:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1070:
1068:
1055:
1054:
1047:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1001:
999:
960:
959:
955:
950:437 (2018).
939:
938:
934:
924:
922:
905:
904:
900:
890:
888:
883:
882:
878:
868:
866:
857:
856:
852:
842:
840:
836:
832:
831:
827:
817:
815:
809:
808:
804:
794:
792:
787:
786:
782:
772:
770:
766:
762:
761:
757:
747:
745:
729:
728:
717:
707:
705:
694:
693:
684:
674:
672:
658:
657:
644:
634:
632:
618:
617:
608:
598:
596:
592:
585:
584:
580:
568:
564:
557:
553:
548:
535:Tenth Amendment
525:Abbott v. Perez
509:
476:Abbott v. Perez
450:
438:Sonia Sotomayor
426:
390:Clarence Thomas
386:Anthony Kennedy
374:
347:
305:
205:
203:Sonia Sotomayor
193:
181:
179:Clarence Thomas
171:Anthony Kennedy
90:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1830:
1828:
1820:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1794:
1793:
1787:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1780:
1779:
1771:
1763:
1755:
1747:
1739:
1730:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1716:
1715:
1712:
1711:
1709:
1708:
1699:
1696:
1695:
1689:
1682:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1675:
1674:
1666:
1658:
1650:
1642:
1634:
1626:
1618:
1610:
1601:
1598:
1597:
1591:
1584:
1583:
1580:
1579:
1577:
1576:
1568:
1560:
1552:
1544:
1536:
1528:
1520:
1511:
1508:
1507:
1501:
1494:
1493:
1487:
1485:
1484:
1477:
1470:
1462:
1456:
1455:
1446:
1402:
1401:External links
1399:
1396:
1395:
1384:on May 2, 2020
1374:Broke America"
1357:
1346:on May 2, 2020
1326:
1298:
1265:
1238:
1207:
1173:
1142:
1114:
1094:Judicial Watch
1078:
1061:Judicial Watch
1045:
1025:Judicial Watch
1009:
981:10.1086/702577
953:
932:
898:
876:
850:
825:
814:. The Atlantic
802:
780:
755:
715:
702:Bloomberg L.P.
682:
671:on May 2, 2020
642:
631:on May 2, 2020
606:
578:
570:52 U.S.C.
562:
550:
549:
547:
544:
543:
542:
537:
532:
521:
508:
505:
449:
446:
430:Stephen Breyer
425:
422:
406:
405:
402:
373:
370:
366:Noel Francisco
359:Eric E. Murphy
346:
343:
304:
301:
273:
272:
266:52 U.S.C.
262:
261:
257:
256:
253:
249:
248:
245:
241:
240:
237:
233:
232:
229:
225:
224:
220:
219:
218:
217:
191:Stephen Breyer
168:
165:
160:
154:
153:
149:
148:
141:52 U.S.C.
128:
127:
123:
122:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
84:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1829:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1740:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1721:
1717:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1683:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1594:
1593:Voting rights
1589:
1585:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1542:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1483:
1478:
1476:
1471:
1469:
1464:
1463:
1460:
1454:
1450:
1447:
1442:
1433:
1424:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1373:
1364:
1362:
1358:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1330:
1327:
1315:
1314:
1309:
1302:
1299:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1276:
1269:
1266:
1253:
1249:
1242:
1239:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1211:
1208:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1180:
1178:
1174:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1131:
1130:
1125:
1118:
1115:
1099:
1095:
1088:
1082:
1079:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1030:
1026:
1019:
1013:
1010:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
969:
964:
957:
954:
949:
948:Harv. L. Rev.
944:
936:
933:
921:
917:
913:
909:
902:
899:
886:
880:
877:
864:
860:
854:
851:
835:
829:
826:
813:
806:
803:
790:
784:
781:
765:
759:
756:
743:
739:
738:
733:
726:
724:
722:
720:
716:
704:
703:
698:
691:
689:
687:
683:
670:
666:
662:
655:
653:
651:
649:
647:
643:
630:
626:
622:
615:
613:
611:
607:
591:
590:
582:
579:
575:
571:
566:
563:
560:
555:
552:
545:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
527:
526:
522:
520:
516:
515:
511:
510:
506:
504:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
472:
468:
467:
462:
461:Roberts Court
457:
455:
447:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
423:
421:
417:
415:
411:
403:
400:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
371:
369:
367:
364:
360:
357:
353:
352:Paul M. Smith
345:Supreme Court
344:
342:
339:
335:
331:
330:Jon A. Husted
327:
321:
319:
315:
311:
302:
300:
298:
294:
290:
285:
281:
280:
271:
267:
263:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:Case opinions
221:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:Chief Justice
158:
157:
155:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
109:
105:
102:
98:
93:
88:
82:
81:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1773:
1765:
1757:
1749:
1741:
1733:
1702:
1668:
1661:
1660:
1652:
1644:
1636:
1628:
1620:
1612:
1604:
1570:
1562:
1556:Bush v. Gore
1554:
1546:
1538:
1532:Ray v. Blair
1530:
1522:
1514:
1407:
1386:. Retrieved
1382:the original
1378:The Atlantic
1371:
1348:. Retrieved
1344:the original
1329:
1317:. Retrieved
1311:
1301:
1289:. Retrieved
1285:the original
1278:
1268:
1256:. Retrieved
1252:the original
1241:
1229:. Retrieved
1225:the original
1221:Mother Jones
1210:
1198:. Retrieved
1194:the original
1190:Mother Jones
1164:. Retrieved
1158:
1133:. Retrieved
1127:
1117:
1105:. Retrieved
1098:the original
1081:
1069:. Retrieved
1065:the original
1036:. Retrieved
1029:the original
1012:
1000:. Retrieved
972:
966:
956:
935:
925:February 14,
923:. Retrieved
911:
901:
889:. Retrieved
879:
867:. Retrieved
862:
853:
841:. Retrieved
828:
816:. Retrieved
805:
793:. Retrieved
783:
771:. Retrieved
758:
746:. Retrieved
742:the original
735:
700:
673:. Retrieved
669:the original
633:. Retrieved
629:the original
625:The Atlantic
599:September 8,
597:. Retrieved
588:
581:
574:§ 20507
565:
554:
523:
512:
474:
470:
464:
458:
451:
427:
418:
413:
409:
407:
394:Neil Gorsuch
382:John Roberts
378:Samuel Alito
375:
348:
322:
306:
297:voter caging
278:
277:
276:
270:§ 20507
260:Laws applied
215:Neil Gorsuch
210:
198:
195:Samuel Alito
186:
174:
163:John Roberts
145:§ 20507
103:
95:Case history
78:
53:
15:
1724:Other cases
1107:January 10,
1071:January 10,
1038:January 10,
975:: 213–255.
891:December 8,
869:November 6,
843:October 16,
442:Elena Kagan
236:Concurrence
207:Elena Kagan
1796:Categories
1453:SCOTUSblog
885:"Schedule"
863:SCOTUSblog
706:Retrieved
546:References
489:Fourteenth
318:Cincinnati
303:Background
60:Docket no.
1449:Case page
1160:USA Today
997:159123657
989:0081-9557
920:0362-4331
818:August 8,
795:August 8,
773:August 8,
463:with its
310:Cleveland
255:Sotomayor
131:Both the
87:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
1406:Text of
1319:June 11,
1313:NBC News
1291:June 11,
1280:NBC News
1258:March 6,
1231:March 6,
1200:March 6,
1166:June 11,
1135:June 11,
791:. SCOTUS
769:. SCOTUS
708:June 11,
507:See also
493:Jim Crow
428:Justice
314:Columbus
291:and the
228:Majority
135:and the
115:6th Cir.
1002:July 9,
748:July 9,
424:Dissent
252:Dissent
244:Dissent
126:Holding
117:2016);
1778:(2019)
1770:(1986)
1762:(1968)
1754:(1941)
1746:(1932)
1738:(1921)
1707:(1900)
1673:(2021)
1665:(2018)
1657:(2013)
1649:(2008)
1641:(2006)
1633:(1970)
1625:(1915)
1617:(1903)
1609:(1898)
1575:(2020)
1567:(2020)
1559:(2000)
1551:(2000)
1543:(1983)
1535:(1952)
1527:(1934)
1519:(1892)
1444:
1438:
1435:
1429:
1426:
1423:Justia
1420:
1388:May 2,
1350:May 2,
995:
987:
946:, 132
940:Note,
918:
675:May 2,
635:May 2,
572:
559:Docket
440:, and
392:, and
361:, and
316:, and
268:
239:Thomas
213:
211:·
209:
201:
199:·
197:
189:
187:·
185:
177:
175:·
173:
143:
106:, 838
64:16-980
1693:cases
1595:cases
1505:cases
1414:
1101:(PDF)
1090:(PDF)
1032:(PDF)
1021:(PDF)
993:S2CID
837:(PDF)
767:(PDF)
665:Slate
593:(PDF)
497:Alito
100:Prior
77:___ (
1416:U.S.
1390:2020
1352:2020
1321:2018
1293:2018
1260:2021
1233:2021
1202:2021
1168:2016
1137:2018
1109:2021
1073:2021
1040:2021
1004:2019
985:ISSN
973:2018
927:2018
916:ISSN
893:2017
871:2017
845:2017
820:2017
797:2017
775:2017
750:2019
710:2018
677:2020
637:2020
601:2018
473:and
119:cert
108:F.3d
80:more
75:U.S.
73:584
1451:at
1412:584
1129:CNN
977:doi
111:699
89:141
1798::
1410:,
1376:.
1360:^
1338:.
1310:.
1277:.
1219:.
1188:.
1176:^
1157:.
1145:^
1126:.
1092:.
1059:.
1048:^
1023:.
991:.
983:.
971:.
965:.
914:.
910:.
861:.
734:.
718:^
699:.
685:^
663:.
645:^
623:.
609:^
436:,
388:,
384:,
368:.
354:,
320:.
312:,
1481:e
1474:t
1467:v
1392:.
1354:.
1323:.
1295:.
1262:.
1235:.
1204:.
1170:.
1139:.
1111:.
1075:.
1042:.
1006:.
979::
929:.
895:.
873:.
847:.
822:.
799:.
777:.
752:.
712:.
679:.
639:.
603:.
576:.
113:(
83:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.